** ******** **** ** *.*** ******* (********* Samsung *** *******), *.*** ******** **** *********** ***, both ****** ******* *.*** ******* ***, worse, ** ************* ******.*** *******.
***, ****** ** ******** ******** *.*** performance ******** **** ***** ******* ********** smart ***** ** ***** ******* * and * *****, ****** ** ****** bitrates ** *** ****.
** ****** * *** * ****** cameras ******* ***** ***** ******** *********** from ****, *********, *** *********, **** 1080p *** ** ***********, ** *** how **** *** ***** ***** ********* with *.***.
*******
** *** *****, *** ******* * and * *****' *********** ** *** and ********** ***** ***** ******** ********** lower ******** **** *********** *.*** ***** codec ******* ** **** ******, *** with **** ***** ***********:
- **** ** *.*** *******:*****, *** **** ** ********** *.*** VMS ******* ***** **** *** **** majority ** ***** **** *** *** the **** ******** *** * *** Q *****, **** ***** ***** ******* end-to-end *******. **** ** ******** ** change ** *** **** ****** ** few ***** ******* *.*** *** ****** drivers **** ** ******* ******* *.*** ******* ** *** ******* until ****.
- *.*** ***********:*.*** **** ********** *** *********** **** other *************' ******** ***** ***** ****** in *** *****, *** *** *********** higher ** *** *****. *******, ** was ********* ** *** ***** ****** (Avigilon, *******, *********, *****, *****) ** our *****.
- *** ****** *****:** *** *****, *********'* ** ****** with ***** ****** ******** ***** ******** than *** ******* * ***** *.***/********** in ******* ******, *** **** *** Hikvision *** **** ***** ****** **** produced ***** ******* ******** **** ********** * *****.
- ******** '****' ***** ******* ********: *** '****'******* ****** *********** *********** *** ******** of ********** *******, ****** **** ******* likely ******** *** **** *****..
*******, ** ** **** *****, *.*** alone ******** ****** ***** ** *******, 20-25%, **** ***** *** **% ************* have *******.
Technical ********
**** *** *** ********* ******** **** this ****:
- ********** "******" *** ********** ***** ******* impact, ****** ******* ** ***** ***** codecs, **** ** **** ********* (****), and ********* *.***+.
- ********** ****** ******* ******** ** **%+, with ********** **** **% **** ******* GOV *******.
- ******* *** ** *** *** *** not ****** *********, ********* ********** ** be ******* ** ********.
- ** *** ** ******* * ******, H.265 **** ********** ****** *** ******* GOV ******** ***** ******** **** **** and ********* *******, *** ****** **** the ********* ** ****** **** ***** Coding (****) ** ******* ***** *** high ****** ******.
- ** *** ***** ******* * ******, H.265 *** *** ****** ******** ***** competitive *.*** ***** ***** ****** (**** and *********).
- ******* * *** * *.*** ******* were *** ********* ** ***** ****, Milestone ******** *********, ** ******* ******** Center (*** ** ***** ******* *.*** generally).
- ********** *** ******* *** ***** *.*** were ******** ********* ** *** ***** tested, ********* ********, *****, *****, *******, and *********.
************
********** ** ********* ********* ** *** Wisenet * [**** ** ****** *********] and * ***** [**** ** ****** available] ****. ***** *** ****** ***** the **** **** *** ** *** Wisenet **** (**/**** *******, ***** **, etc.) ** **** ** *** *** end (***/*** *** **** ***** *****/*******).
*** *** **** ** ******** ******* * ****. ****** *** **** ** ******, including *** *** ******* * *** 4K ******* * ******.
*************
*.*** ** ******** ** * ****** type ** *** ******'* *** *********, next ** *.*** *** ***** *******. Configuration ******* *** *.*** *** ******* to *.*** (*** ** "***" – see **** *****, ***** ****, ******* cap, ***.).

**** ******* ** **** **** *** options *** ******* ***. ******* *** defaults ** * ******* ** **, but *** ** ********* ** ***.

*******, ********** (******* ***********) ** *** located ** *** ***** ******* ****, but ******* ***** ****** ********. ***** may ****** ***/***/******/****, ********* *****.

Wisestream ******* *******
** *** *****, ********** ***** ******* was ******* ** ****** ****** ** Wisestream (********** ****), ***** *** ** a ********* ******* ********* ** *** user's ***. *** ******* ***** ***** the **** *** ***** ******** **** Off ******* ****, **** ********** ******* on *** *** ******, *** ******* reductions ** ******* ** ****.

** *** **** ******, ** ***** Wisestream's "******" ******* ** ** ******* similar *** **** ********* "****" (**** below ** ***** ********) *** *********'* H.264+. ******* ** ****, "******" *** used ** *** ***** ** **** comparisons ** **** ******.

*** ****** ***********
***** ********** ****** *** **** ** the ** *** ***** ******* ** this ****, ** *** *** ***-*****, this ******* ******** ** ************* **** pixelation *** ***** ***********. *** *******, in *** ********* *****, ****** ******* of *** ******* ****** ********** ******* using ****** (*** ****), ***** *** not ** ***** ** ***** ******.

Wisestream ***********
** ******** ********* ***** ********** *** to ******, ** * ********** ******* image ******* ********* (********* *****) *** bitrate *********.
********** ****** ******* ******* ** ~**% using **** *.*** *** *.***, *** over **% **** ******* *** *******. However, ******* *** ** *** *** had ****** ******, **** ******** **** slightly ***** **** **** *** ******* disabled. **** ** ******* ** **** Zipstream ** ******* *********, ***** ******** dynamic *** **** ******* *********** ** disabled.

** *****, ********** *** **** ********* with *.***, ******** ******* ** ~**% without ******* *** *** ** **** 80% **** ** *******. *.*** ********** were *********** (**-**%), ****** *** ** great.

********** "****" ******* ******** ** ** to ** ********** **% ******** ** Wisestream ******, ****** **** *********** ***** quality **********, ** ***** *****.

Wisestream *.*** **. *.*** ***** ******
** ****** *.*** ***** ********** ** both *** **** *** ******* * line ** **** ** *** *** cost ******* *. *********** ***** **** taken ***** ********** ****** *** ******* GOV ***.
******* * / **
***** *.*** **** **********, *** ******* 4K ****** *** *********** **** ***** 4K ****** ** **** ***** ** daytime ******, ****** ******* ****** **** the ********* **** ** ******* **** motion. ** *****, *** *.*** ******* was ************* ***** **** ******, ~* Mb/s ***** *********, *** * **/* lower **** *********.

******* * / *****
** *** ***** ******* * ******, the***-***** (*** *** ****), *.*** ******** ******** ***** **% lower **** *.*** ** *** *****.
*******, **** *** **** *** ********* cameras' ******* ******** **** ***** **** the ******* *'* *.*** ******, ** about *** **/*. *******, ** *****, the ******* * (*.*** *** *.***) was ************* *****.

H.265 **. *.***, ** ***** *****
** ****** *** ***** ****** ** all ******* ** *** *** *.*** compared "***" ******* *.***. ** ******* scenes, *** ******* * ******'* *.*** bitrate *** *** ****** ** *** cameras ****** ** **%+. *******, *** H.264 ******* *** ************* (**-**%) ***** than ***********, ** ****.
** *****, **** *** ********* *** Panasonic *******' *.*** ******* *** ***** than **** *** ******* *'* *.*** and *.*** ******.
********* *.*** ** *.*** ** *** Wisenet *, *.*** *** ~**% ***** than *.*** ****** *** ***, *** ~25% ** *****, **** ***** **** the **% ********* ********* ******* ** manufacturers.

H.265 *** *******
*** ******* * ****** ******* ****** were *** ********** ********* ** *** VMSes ** *** **** ** *******. H.264 ********* *** ***** ***/** ****** drivers ****** ******** ** ********, *****, Genetec, *** *********. *.*** ********* *** not **** ** *** *** ********** H.265 (***** ****, *******, ********* ********* 2016 **).
********** *.*** ******** *** **** *** remains ****, **** ***** ******* *** expected ***** ****. ******* ****** *** our*** *** **** ***** **** ******* H.265****** *** **** *******.
Test **********
*** ********* ******** ******** **** ****:
- ******* ***-*****: *.*********
- **** *****-*: *.**.*
- ********* **-********-***: **.*.* ***** ******
- ********* **-*******: *.**
- ******* ***-*****: *.*********
- **** *****-*: *.**.*.*
- ********* **-**********-**: **.*.* ***** ******
Comments (9)
Undisclosed Manufacturer #1
Great summary and testing! I have a couple of questions as it pertains to the PC requirements for H.265 in general.
I have been hearing that H.265 requires more robust PC hardware to decode both live and recorded images and would cost the customer a sum of money to upgrade existing workstations or that the cost of the workstations and hardware required to decode H.265 would be higher than using standard hardware and just increasing the customers storage. Is this true or false or somewhere in between? Could you please speak to this aspect of H.265?
Could you also provide the specifications of the PC that you used to test?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #2
Thanks Ethan!
Is there a "Day/High Motion" in this test?
Create New Topic
Eddie Perry
I have seen similar results as well to bad the WV-781L cost does not come close enough to the Q series to justify it.
I have both side by side on my bench(QNO-7010R and WV-781L). its sad to see so much wasted money on the 781L. I really bracing myself for disappointment for the new Panasonic H265 extreme series. Its getting harder and harder to justify sending more than $200 on 720p and 1080p cameras even if they are going to be the most secure cameras on the market and come with free VMS licenses
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #2
That's true.
When smart codecs were on though, the difference between h.265 vs h.264 was more significant
being around 38% for Day/Still and 32% for Day/Motion and 70% for Night.
IMHO, someone interested in bandwidth savings would probably have smart codecs on to begin with, so I think this is an important metric for h.265 on vs h.264.
Create New Topic