Hanwha / Samsung Wisestream H.265 Test

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Oct 26, 2016

In our first test of H.265 cameras (including Samsung and Vivotek), H.265 benefits were essentially nil, both versus leading H.264 cameras and, worse, to emerging smart codec H.264 cameras.

Now, Hanwha is claiming improved H.265 performance combined with their Samsung Wisestream smart codec in their Wisenet P and Q lines, aiming to reduce bitrates to new lows.

We tested P and Q series cameras against smart codec equipped competitors from Axis, Hikvision, and Panasonic, both 1080p and 4K resolutions, to see how this new smart codec performed with H.265.

** ******** **** ** *.*** ******* (********* ******* *** *******), *.*** ******** **** *********** ***, **** ****** ******* *.*** cameras ***, *****, ** ************* ******.*** *******.

***, ****** ** ******** ******** *.*** *********** ******** **** ***** Samsung ********** ***** ***** ** ***** ******* * *** * lines, ****** ** ****** ******** ** *** ****.

** ****** * *** * ****** ******* ******* ***** ***** equipped *********** **** ****, *********, *** *********, **** ***** *** 4K ***********, ** *** *** **** *** ***** ***** ********* with *.***.

[***************]

*******

** *** *****, *** ******* * *** * *****' *********** of *** *** ********** ***** ***** ******** ********** ***** ******** than *********** *.*** ***** ***** ******* ** **** ******, *** with **** ***** ***********:

  • **** ** *.*** *******:*****, *** **** ** ********** *.*** *** ******* ***** **** the **** ******** ** ***** **** *** *** *** **** benefits *** * *** * *****, **** ***** ***** ******* end-to-end *******. **** ** ******** ** ****** ** *** **** future ** *** ***** ******* *.*** *** ****** ******* **** be ******* ******* *.*** ******* ** *** ******* ***** ****.
  • *.*** ***********:*.*** **** ********** *** *********** **** ***** *************' ******** ***** smart ****** ** *** *****, *** *** *********** ****** ** any *****. *******, ** *** ********* ** *** ***** ****** (Avigilon, *******, *********, *****, *****) ** *** *****.
  • *** ****** *****:** *** *****, *********'* ** ****** **** ***** ****** ******** lower ******** **** *** ******* * ***** *.***/********** ** ******* scenes, *** **** *** ********* *** **** ***** ****** **** produced ***** ******* ******** **** ********** * *****.
  • ******** '****' ***** ******* ********: *** '****'******* ****** *********** *********** *** ******** ** ********** *******, ****** this ******* ****** ******** *** **** *****..

*******, ** ** **** *****, *.*** ***** ******** ****** ***** it *******, **-**%, **** ***** *** **% ************* **** *******.

Technical ********

**** *** *** ********* ******** **** **** ****:

  • ********** "******" *** ********** ***** ******* ******, ****** ******* ** other ***** ******, **** ** **** ********* (****), *** ********* H.264+.
  • ********** ****** ******* ******** ** **%+, **** ********** **** **% with ******* *** *******.
  • ******* *** ** *** *** *** *** ****** *********, ********* Wisestream ** ** ******* ** ********.
  • ** *** ** ******* * ******, *.*** **** ********** ****** and ******* *** ******** ***** ******** **** **** *** ********* cameras, *** ****** **** *** ********* ** ****** **** ***** Coding (****) ** ******* ***** *** **** ****** ******.
  • ** *** ***** ******* * ******, *.*** *** *** ****** bitrates ***** *********** *.*** ***** ***** ****** (**** *** *********).
  • ******* * *** * *.*** ******* **** *** ********* ** Axxon ****, ********* ******** *********, ** ******* ******** ****** (*** of ***** ******* *.*** *********).
  • ********** *** ******* *** ***** *.*** **** ******** ********* ** all ***** ******, ********* ********, *****, *****, *******, *** *********.

************

********** ** ********* ********* ** ********** ***** *********. ***** *** ****** ***** *** **** **** *** ** the ******* **** (**/**** *******, ***** **, ***.) ** **** as *** *** *** (***/*** *** **** ***** *****/*******).

*** *** **** ** ******** ******* * ****. ****** *** **** ** ******, ********* *** *** ******* Q *** ** ******* * ******.

*************

*.*** ** ******** ** * ****** **** ** *** ******'* web *********, **** ** *.*** *** ***** *******. ************* ******* for *.*** *** ******* ** *.*** (*** ** "***" – see **** *****, ***** ****, ******* ***, ***.).

**** ******* ** **** **** *** ******* *** ******* ***. Dynamic *** ******** ** * ******* ** **, *** *** be ********* ** ***.

*******, ********** (******* ***********) ** *** ******* ** *** ***** profile ****, *** ******* ***** ****** ********. ***** *** ****** off/low/medium/high, ********* *****.

Wisestream ******* *******

** *** *****, ********** ***** ******* *** ******* ** ****** levels ** ********** (********** ****), ***** *** ** * ********* problem ********* ** *** ****'* ***. *** ******* ***** ***** the **** *** ***** ******** **** *** ******* ****, **** noticeable ******* ** *** *** ******, *** ******* ********** ** quality ** ****.

** *** **** ******, ** ***** **********'* "******" ******* ** be ******* ******* *** **** ********* "****" (**** ***** ** 1080p ********) *** *********'* *.***+. ******* ** ****, "******" *** used ** *** ***** ** **** *********** ** **** ******.

*** ****** ***********

***** ********** ****** *** **** ** *** ** *** ***** cameras ** **** ****, ** *** *** ***-*****, **** ******* resulted ** ************* **** ********** *** ***** ***********. *** *******, in *** ********* *****, ****** ******* ** *** ******* ****** moderately ******* ***** ****** (*** ****), ***** *** *** ** issue ** ***** ******.

Wisestream ***********

** ******** ********* ***** ********** *** ** ******, ** * compromise ******* ***** ******* ********* (********* *****) *** ******* *********.

********** ****** ******* ******* ** ~**% ***** **** *.*** *** H.265, *** **** **% **** ******* *** *******. *******, ******* GOV ** *** *** *** ****** ******, **** ******** **** slightly ***** **** **** *** ******* ********. **** ** ******* to **** ********* ** ******* *********, ***** ******** ******* *** when ******* *********** ** ********.

** *****, ********** *** **** ********* **** *.***, ******** ******* by ~**% ******* ******* *** *** ** **** **% **** it *******. *.*** ********** **** *********** (**-**%), ****** *** ** great.

********** "****" ******* ******** ** ** ** ** ********** **% compared ** ********** ******, ****** **** *********** ***** ******* **********, as ***** *****.

Wisestream *.*** **. *.*** ***** ******

** ****** *.*** ***** ********** ** **** *** **** *** Wisenet * **** ** **** ** *** *** **** ******* Q. *********** ***** **** ***** ***** ********** ****** *** ******* GOV ***.

******* * / **

***** *.*** **** **********, *** ******* ** ****** *** *********** with ***** ** ****** ** **** ***** ** ******* ******, though ******* ****** **** *** ********* **** ** ******* **** motion. ** *****, *** *.*** ******* *** ************* ***** **** others, ~* **/* ***** *********, *** * **/* ***** **** Hikvision.

******* * / *****

** *** ***** ******* * ******, ******-***** (*** *** ****), *.*** ******** ******** ***** **% ***** **** *.*** ** the *****.

*******, **** *** **** *** ********* *******' ******* ******** **** lower **** *** ******* *'* *.*** ******, ** ***** *** Kb/s. *******, ** *****, *** ******* * (*.*** *** *.***) was ************* *****.

H.265 **. *.***, ** ***** *****

** ****** *** ***** ****** ** *** ******* ** *** how *.*** ******** "***" ******* *.***. ** ******* ******, *** Wisenet * ******'* *.*** ******* *** *** ****** ** *** cameras ****** ** **%+. *******, *** *.*** ******* *** ************* (40-50%) ***** **** ***********, ** ****.

** *****, **** *** ********* *** ********* *******' *.*** ******* was ***** **** **** *** ******* *'* *.*** *** *.*** stream.

********* *.*** ** *.*** ** *** ******* *, *.*** *** ~18% ***** **** *.*** ****** *** ***, *** ~**% ** night, **** ***** **** *** **% ********* ********* ******* ** manufacturers.

H.265 *** *******

*** ******* * ****** ******* ****** **** *** ********** ********* by *** ***** ** *** **** ** *******. *.*** ********* via ***** ***/** ****** ******* ****** ******** ** ********, *****, Genetec, *** *********. *.*** ********* *** *** **** ** *** VMS ********** *.*** (***** ****, *******, ********* ********* **** **).

********** *.*** ******** *** **** *** ******* ****, **** ***** support *** ******** ***** ****. ******* ****** *** ****** *** **** ***** **** ******* *.********* *** **** *******.

Test **********

*** ********* ******** ******** **** ****:

  • ******* ***-*****: *.*********
  • **** *****-*: *.**.*
  • ********* **-********-***: **.*.* ***** ******
  • ********* **-*******: *.**
  • ******* ***-*****: *.*********
  • **** *****-*: *.**.*.*
  • ********* **-**********-**: **.*.* ***** ******

Comments (9)

Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

10/26/16 05:55pm

Great summary and testing! I have a couple of questions as it pertains to the PC requirements for H.265 in general.

I have been hearing that H.265 requires more robust PC hardware to decode both live and recorded images and would cost the customer a sum of money to upgrade existing workstations or that the cost of the workstations and hardware required to decode H.265 would be higher than using standard hardware and just increasing the customers storage. Is this true or false or somewhere in between? Could you please speak to this aspect of H.265?

Could you also provide the specifications of the PC that you used to test?

Undisclosed #2

10/26/16 07:22pm

Thanks Ethan!

Comparing H.265 to H.264 in the Wisenet P, H.265 was ~18% lower than H.264 during the day, and ~25% at night, much lower than the 50% reduction typically claimed by manufacturers.

Is there a "Day/High Motion" in this test?

Thumbnail profile pic

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 10/26/16 09:46pm

Yes, I'll dig out those numbers this afternoon for you.

Thumbnail profile pic

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 10/27/16 02:01am

Actually, I just realized neither the Hikvision nor Panasonic increase in higher motion, because they both force 16 Mb/s caps. That's why I didn't include that in the report. Since they're both bumping the cap, we can go as far as testing how much they increase quantization in those scenes, but I did not for this test.

It is sort of interesting they both force caps that low, considering I've seen some of the 4K cameras spit out a 20-30 Mb/s stream at times.

I'll grab the Samsung numbers and reply back.

Undisclosed Manufacturer #3

In reply to Ethan Ace | 10/27/16 01:53pm

Ethan, are you sure they max out at 16 Mb/s?

It can be too low for comfort to handle peak events and could mean loss of detail, or even frames, in complex scenes or when panning and zooming.

There is probably a setting somewhere to remove this bitrate cap?

It would also be interesting if you can test the smart encoders in daylight with high motion (like moving the camera sideways), and compare the image quality and bitrate with non-smart encoders.

Eddie Perry

10/26/16 07:58pm

I have seen similar results as well to bad the WV-781L cost does not come close enough to the Q series to justify it.

I have both side by side on my bench(QNO-7010R and WV-781L). its sad to see so much wasted money on the 781L. I really bracing myself for disappointment for the new Panasonic H265 extreme series. Its getting harder and harder to justify sending more than $200 on 720p and 1080p cameras even if they are going to be the most secure cameras on the market and come with free VMS licenses

Michael Miller

In reply to Eddie Perry | 10/26/16 08:54pm

Are you saying the image on the 4MP QNO-7010R is better than the 4K WV-781L?

Undisclosed #2

11/01/16 08:37pm

We turned off smart codecs in all cameras to see how H.265 compared "raw" against H.264...

Comparing H.265 to H.264 in the Wisenet P, H.265 was ~18% lower than H.264 during the day, and ~25% at night, much lower than the 50% reduction typically claimed by manufacturers.

That's true.

When smart codecs were on though, the difference between h.265 vs h.264 was more significant

being around 38% for Day/Still and 32% for Day/Motion and 70% for Night.

IMHO, someone interested in bandwidth savings would probably have smart codecs on to begin with, so I think this is an important metric for h.265 on vs h.264.

Undisclosed Manufacturer #3

In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 11/01/16 09:44pm

It's expected that smart H.265 should outperform smart H.264 by a wider margin than non-smart/'raw'. This is partly due to that H.265 compresses I-frames more efficiently and in static scenes the I frames will dominate the streamed data (P and B frames will be small). H.265 further has more functions that 'smarts' can use.

So assuming that smart encoders is the default use case, H.265 performs quite well.

Still, a full H.265 encoder should have a 40-50% lower bitrate than H.264 in the 'raw' based on test of reference encoders, at least for more complex scenes. That Wisenet has a smaller difference may be due to the chipset or tuning immaturity. One expect that to improve.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever. In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Axis Supports HD Analog on Apr 15, 2019
In 2017, Axis declared 'Everything is IP': Now, in 2019, Axis has released support for HD analog, with their new encoders.  Why the change?...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...
Spring 2019 50+ New Products Directory on Apr 08, 2019
We are compiling a list of new products for Spring 2019 and have over 50 already. Contrast to Fall 2018 New Products Directory and Spring 2018...
Airship VMS Profile on Apr 03, 2019
Airship has been developing VMS software for over 10 years, however, with no outside investment, and minimal marketing, the company is not well...
Dahua Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 01, 2019
Dahua favorability declined, in IPVM's 2019 integrator favorability series, driven by their backdoors, resulting in mass hacking and US government...
Panasonic Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 27, 2019
Panasonic favorability declined, as the company struggled to find its way amidst a changing market and its ill-timed decision to become a Dahua...
Casino Security Consultant Carl Lindgren Interview on Mar 26, 2019
For more than 20 years, Carl Lindgren worked as a casino surveillance pro, while being active (and sometimes outspoken) on various online video...

Most Recent Industry Reports

H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
Register for the Spring Access Control Course. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike manufacturer...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...
Milestone Drops IFSEC on Apr 18, 2019
Milestone has dropped out of Europe's largest annual security trade show (IFSEC 2019), telling IPVM that they "have found that IFSEC in EMEA no...
The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever. In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact