H.265 IP Cameras Tested vs H.264

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jan 18, 2016

For more than 2 years, anticipation has been building for H.265 IP cameras. Finally, H.265 cameras are starting to ship from multiple manufacturers in North America.

The promise is ~50% bandwidth reduction which, if true, would be a huge saver for storage costs as well as making remote monitoring easier and large scale VSaaS more feasible. In the mean time, 'smart codecs' for H.264, have come out, which also offer significant bandwidth savings (e.g., see our Axis Zipstream test).

We tested H.265 cameras from Samsung and Vivotek to understand:

  • Bandwidth tradeoff / savings compared to current H.264 camera models widely used (e.g., IP Camera Bandwidth / Storage Shootout).
  • CPU Load tradeoffs vs H.264 for viewing
  • VMS support for H.265
  • Finally, H.265 vs Smart Codecs such as Axis Zipstream

We performed both technical stream analysis and image quality comparisons to understand quality and bandwidth tradeoffs.

******* **** * *****, ************ *** **** building *** *.*** ** cameras. *******, *.*** ******* are ******** ** **** from ******** ************* ** North *******.

*** ******* ** ~**% bandwidth ********* *****, ** true, ***** ** * huge ***** *** ******* costs ** **** ** making ****** ********** ****** and ***** ***** ***** more ********. ** *** mean ****, '***** ******' for *.***, **** **** out, ***** **** ***** significant ********* ******* (*.*.,*** *** **** ********* test).

** ****** *.*** ******* from ******* *** ******* to **********:

  • ********* ******** / ******* compared ** ******* *.*** camera ****** ****** **** (e.g., ** ****** ********* / Storage ********).
  • *** **** ********* ** H.264 *** *******
  • *** ******* *** *.***
  • *******, *.*** ** ***** Codecs **** ** **** Zipstream

** ********* **** ********* stream ******** *** ***** quality *********** ** ********** quality *** ********* *********.

[***************]

Key ********

*** / ***, ***** two *.*** ******* ******* minimal ** ** ********* savings ******** ** ****** / ******* *.*** *******. Worse, **** ********* (* smart ***** *.*** **************) performed ************* ****** **** H.265. ******* *********, *** support ***** *** ** very ******* *** ** did **** * ***-******* level ** ******** ** CPU **** **** ***** H.265.

** ** *** *** looking *** * ******** or * **** **** advantage, ***** *.*** ******* will **** **** ** they *** **** ** general ******* *******. *******, they ***** ** **** benefits **** ******* ************ H.264 ** ******* *** have ******* ********** ** *** ******* and *** ****.

Warning: *.*** **** *******

**** **** *.*** *********** efficiency / ************* *** better **** *** ***** (e.g., **** *.*** ******* vs *****'* *.*** *******), we ****** *** **** for *.***. ** ** still **** ***** ** the ********* *** *.*** with, *** *******, *** of *** ******* **** / *********** *********, ********* still *** ******** ***** H.265 *** (*** ************* is **** **** ****** tested **** *** ***** HiSilicon). ******* *** ************* findings **** ***** *******, it ** ******** / likely **** ** *** next *** *****, *.*** will ***** *********** ************ over *** ******* ****** offerings.

**** **** ******: *** Samsung ****** ** ****** is ***** '********' *.*** offering. ******* ** *** releasing *** *.*** ******* that *** ******* ***** codecs (***** ********* ****: SmartStream) ***** **** ***** significantly ******* *********. ** plan ** **** **** and **** **** ****** this ******.

H.265 ****** ******** **********

** ******* *** *.*** streams **** ***** *******, we *********** *********. ******* ***********, **** ******** ******** detailed ************ *********** *** streams (****** ********* **** not ******* *.***/****), **** a ********* ******* ** I/B/P ***** *********, ** well ** *** ******* to **** ******** ******** information *** **** *****. Using **** **** ** were **** ** ******* the ************ ****** ** H.265 *** *.*** ******* from *** *** *******, shown ** *** ******* below.

** ****** *** ****** of ******* *** ** this *****:


Samsung *.*** ***** / *******

*******'* ***-*****'* *** ********* is ****** ********* **** previous *.*** ******, **** two *** *******:

  • *****, **** *********, *** ability ** ****** ** H.265 ******** ******* ** present, **** ******* **** the **** ** *.***. However, **** **** *.*** may *** ** *** as *******, ****** ******** in *** *** *********, even **** ******* *******, nor *** ** ** used *** ********* ** SD. ** *** ** viewed *** ******* ********* in *******'* *********** ******.
  • ******, **** ****** ******** no ****** ** *** compression ** * ******** level **** ***** ***. Past ******* ****** ******** a *-** ***** ** compression ******. ******* **** option, ***** ** ** way ** ******** ******* quality ******* *.*** *** H.264 ** * ******** quantization.

** ******* ****** ******* configuration ** **** *****:

Vivotek *.*** ***** / *******

******* ** *******, *** bulk ** *** ******* IP9171-HP's *** ********* ** unchanged **** ******** ******, aside **** *** ******* for *.*** (****** ******* beneath *.*** *** ***** in ***** ********) *** Smart ****** **. ******* to **** *********, ***** ****** ** varies * ***** ******** and *********** ******* *********** on ****** ******* ***/** fixed ****. ** **** cover ***** ****** ** performance ** **** ****** in * ******** ******.

**** **** ******* ******** options *** *** (**** fixed *********** ***** *** a ***) *** ***, unlike *******, ***** ******* direct ********** ** *.***/*.*** at ******** ********.

** ******* ****** *** Vivotek *** ********* ** this *****:

Compared ** *.*** ********** *******

** *** *****, *.*** bitrates **** ******* ** higher **** ******** ** typical *.*** ******. *** example, *** ***** ***** shows *******'* *** ******-** (both *.*** *** *.***) compared ** ********* *** Axis, **** *** ******* set ** ~** ************. Vivotek's *.*** ****** *** lower **** ********* *.*** only ****** *** ***, but ****** **** **** Axis *** ********* ** night. 

************ *** ******* ******* were ***** ***** ~** Q, ** **** ** what ***** *** ********* to, **** ** *** to ******. *****, *.*** bitrates *** ****** **** competitive *.*** ********. **** also **** *** ***** starlight *** ** ~*.*** vs. *******'* ***, *** still ***** *******, ********** at *****.

Compared ** **** *********

*.*** *** *** **** bitrate ********** **** ***** Smart ****** ** ***** CODEC, ***** ****** * frame ******** **** *-** seconds ********* ** ******, and *********** ****** ************ on ****** *******. **** this ****** **, *** Vivotek ******'* ******* ******* was ***** **** **** the **** ***** **** Zipstream *** ** *** settings (******* *** ***, Zipstream "****"). *******, ******* still ****** ************* ** night, **** * **/*, where ********* ******** ***, about *.* **/*. 

**** **** **** ********* numbers ***** *** ************ from ***** ************, ***** no *** **** ****** with ********* *** *********. 

**** **** ** **** to **** *******'* ***** Stream ** *********** ** more ****** ** * future ******.

CPU **** *********

*** *** ******* ******* (~4 **/* *** *****), H.265 ******** *** ******** more ********* ********* **** H.264, **** ** *** and **** *** ***. This *** **** **** viewing **** * ****** stream ** **** ** multiple ************ *******. ***** measurements **** ***** ******* streams *****, ****** ****** ********* showed ******* ******:

*******, **** ******** ****** at ***** ** ****** of *** *.*** *******, CPU ***** ****** *************, with *.*** **** **** ******** H.264 ********* ***** ** a **** *** ** with ********* ***** ****. ***** should ****** ** ***** difference ** ***********, ** client ******** ***** **** fine *** *.*** *** no ****** **** *.*** properly.

***** ** *** ****:

  • *** *** **: *** **** **** *.* GHz, * ** ***, Integrated ****** ********
  • **** *** **: ***** Dual **** **** ** 2.4 ***, ** ** RAM, *** ******* ** 650M ********

VMS *******

** ** ***********, *.*** support **** *****-***** ***** is ****. ** **** able ** ********* *.*** with ******* *** **** *** Vivotek *****. ****** *** Samsung ***** ** *** VMS ******** **** *.***/***** options. ******* ***** *** select *** *.*** *** live, *********, ******, ***., just ** ***** *******, seen *****. 

********* *** ***** **** inform ** **** *** working ** ****** *******, but ** ***** **** given.

*******'* *** ***, ****, support *.*** ******* *** recording ** ***** *** cameras. *******'* *********/*** ******** do *** ******* *.*** currently, *** ***** *********** client ******** **** ******* and ***** **** *********.

Visual ***********

** ***** ***, ** any ******* *********** ******* H.265 *** *.*** ***** similar ************ ******. *** example, **** ***** ***** the *** ****** **** by **** (***** ***** for **** **** *******):

*.*** ** ** *** right, *.*** ** *** left, **** ~*** ** this **********. ****** *********** are *******, *** **** visible **** **** **********, despite *.*** ******** ***** 30% ***** **** *.*** in **** *****.

** **** *****, ** found *** *.*** ***** contrast (**** *****) *** slightly ********* **** *.***, though *** ********* ******* are *****.

Future *******

** ****** *.*** *********** and ****** ** ******* over *** **** *** years, ****** ** ******* to ** **** *** fast ** ********. ** the ********, *.***, ********** with *** ***** ******* and ***** *** ***********, continues ** ** *** easy *** ***** ****** for ****** ***********. ******, if *** ******* *.***********, *.*** *** *** make **** ***** *** many ***** ** **** (or **** ****).

Comments (16)

Yes, finally some real data. Thanks!

Question, although I understand the use in comparing h.265 to competitive h.264, the report doesn't mention the fact that in all cases h.265 had a lower bitrate than for h.264 cameras of the same brand.

For instance, the Daytime Vivotek h.265 bitrate was 33% less than its h.264 bitrate.

While no one should switch brands thinking that h.265 must be better, when choosing a model within a brand it certainly might be better, looking at the data.

"the report doesn't mention the fact that in all cases h.265 had a lower bitrate than for h.264 cameras of the same brand."

It's shown in all the charts. That noted, we do not emphasize it because it does not really impact the general question of whether H.265 is 'better' than H.264.

"when choosing a model within a brand it certainly might be better, looking at the data."

Yes, if you are locked in to using, e.g., the SNV-8081R, then yes H.265 saves on bandwidth, presuming you are using a VMS that supports H.265, the CPU load increase is not a practical issue, etc. Of course, you'd still probably do just as well selecting a 'regular' H.264 camera.

Outstanding write-up Ethan!

The Elecard video segment was a great presentation of the functional deltas (between codecs) for an average scene.

Thank you Ethan for answering the questions I've been wondering about the current performance of H.265 vs H.264 cameras.

On a side note, whereas the free AVInaptic is only available on Windows, I see that Elecard StreamEye is available for Mac OS X as well as Windows which is great. Elecard StreamEye isn't free but it looks like a great tool. Thank you for finding and sharing information about this new and useful tool.

Thanks! Much needed info and looking forward to the Vivotek Smart Stream II report.

Great information, thanks Ethan. Job well done

Has anyone looked at VP9 encoding? Heard some stuff mentioned over at Hacker News, not sure if the encoding has hit any commercial use, but I have read the encoding us supposed to be better than H.265

Write up on VP9 vs. H.265 vs. H.264

I have not heard any IP camera manufacturer talk about adopting VP9 so, whether it is good or bad, does not look like it will have any impact at least in our industry for the foreseeable future.

I PM'ed you as I think this conversation will be off topic from the main article. In any case, your findings seem to contradict another piece I had seen on BBC. I am not sure what criteria they had used to measure their findings, but it does seem to differ than the findings of your article.

Really good article, thanks Ethan!

hope they pull their finger out, I know the 12mp Dahua we're playing with really heats up, so hopefully some smarter encoding chips really make this work like it should

If a camera heats up now, the current HiSilcon H.265 Solution gets even hotter. Faster powerful processing tends to take more Power thus higher clocking SoC and so a bit more heat. Heat kills a product life time.

We all look forward to seeing neon glowing water cooled cameras with transparent cases showing the world we are being looked at! Maybe throw a few LEDs in for good measure. :-)

or, they'll move to a smaller process both saving on heat generated and energy used for the same workload...

However, when bitrates spiked at night in either of the H.265 cameras, CPU usage jumped significantly, with H.265 more than doubling H.264 processor usage in a high end PC with dedicated video card.

Were you using hardware based h.264 decoding, but software based h.265 decoding?

That could have something to do with it. There are some cards already that can do hardware based h.265, notably the GTX-960, and more coming everyday.

It would be interesting to see if that would narrow the gap much. Although, since most systems today don't have hardware based hevc decoding, I think that the real-world test should still be the software based decoding ones.

If you are wondering about how man enough you PC is for H.265 decoding, there is a tool that's been around to give some ideas on decode of 720p 1080p & 2160p. it's a reference benchmark using the open source ffmpeg library.

http://murobbs.muropaketti.com/threads/hevc-decode-benchmark.1188750/page-11

Sitr id in Finish language, a copy of the software is here on dropbox for you.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wu729gaysij2idj/HDBC-x64-V1.4_2.zip?dl=0

Now for die hard want to know more here is a few useful links:

4K playback for little cost nice posting.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/55784335

LAV Filters needed as shown above, allows windows media player for playback using hardware of your GFX card. ( stops that stutter! even in H.264 of course)
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=156191
https://github.com/Nevcairiel/LAVFilters/releases

Samples of 4K High bitrate H.265 Content. For testing your PC decoding abilities.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2014/11/19/samsung-nx1-4k-video-samples-and-new-full-res-frame-grabs-available-for-do

Free Video player for PC uses hardware of Graphics Card ( GPU )
https://mpv.srsfckn.biz/

Shows you technical details about your PC graphics decoding.
http://www.videohelp.com/software/DXVA-Checker

You can assume at time goes by older hardware is replaced, even as of 2015 GPUs from Intel Nvidia and I suspect AMD have both Encode / Decode of H.265 decoding naturally is where the CCTV CMS platforms will help.

Update: The Samsung camera we tested is their 'original' H.265 offering. Samsung is now releasing new H.265 cameras that now include smart codecs (their marketing term: SmartStream) which they claim significantly reduces bandwidth. We plan to test them and then will update this report.

Yes, i was just thinking what is the difference between H.264 and H.265 . Good article

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Milestone "GDPR-ready" Certification Claim Critiqued on Aug 12, 2019
Milestone is touting that its latest XProtect VMS is "GDPR-ready" with a 'European Privacy Seal'. However, our investigation raises significant...
Axis Door Station A8207-VE Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Axis newest door station, the A8207-VE, claims to deliver "video surveillance, two-way communication, and access control" in a single device. But...
Razberi Technologies Company Profile on Aug 06, 2019
Razberi says they have doubled their revenue in the first half of 2019, citing their proprietary camera hardening and cybersecurity capabilities...
Avigilon Blue VSaaS Tested on Aug 05, 2019
Avigilon says Blue is a "powerful integrator cloud service platform", easy to set up and configure, quickly scale business, by leveraging cloud...
Hikvision 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 02, 2019
With their latest Smart Series 5 cameras, Hikvision is claiming cameras "fully loaded" with "state-of-the-art technology for high performance and...
Cisco Settles False Claims Act Suit For Video Surveillance Vulnerabilities on Aug 01, 2019
Cisco entered the video surveillance market in 2007 and suffered for many years through a variety of its own errors and arrogance. The conclusion...
Ionodes Company Profile on Jul 31, 2019
What happened to Ionodes? With seasoned leadership from Jean-Paul Saindon founder of SmartSight and Dr. Michael Gilge, founder of VCS, back in...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...
Verkada People And Face Analytics Tested on Aug 16, 2019
This week, Verkada released "People Analytics", including face analytics that they describe is a "game-changing feature" that "pushes the...
Dahua OEM Directory 2019 on Aug 16, 2019
US Government banned Dahua OEMs for dozens of companies. The following directory includes 40+ of those companies with a graphic and links to...
Installation Course - Register Now on Aug 15, 2019
Register Now for the September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. This is a unique installation course in a market where little practical...
Axis Suffers Outage, Provides Postmortem on Aug 15, 2019
This week, Axis suffered an outage impacting their website and cloud services. Inside this note, we examined what happened, what was impacted...
Hikvision Scrutinized In The Netherlands on Aug 15, 2019
Hikvision is facing unprecedented scrutiny in the Netherlands, at the same time the US government ban has taken effect. This week, a Dutch...
Axis 4K Camera Shootout 2019 on Aug 14, 2019
Axis' 4K Q3518-LVE claims the "best video quality possible", with Lightfinder super low light performance, Axis' high end Forensic WDR, and...
CheckMySystems Company Profile on Aug 14, 2019
CheckMySystems says that too many users respond, "I get an email when something is wrong" when talking about their video system maintenance plan,...
Hikvision OEM Directory on Aug 13, 2019
The Chinese government-owned and US-government banned Hikvision has become the world's largest video surveillance manufacturer and generally hidden...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact