H.265 IP Cameras Tested vs H.264

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Jan 18, 2016

For more than 2 years, anticipation has been building for H.265 IP cameras. Finally, H.265 cameras are starting to ship from multiple manufacturers in North America.

The promise is ~50% bandwidth reduction which, if true, would be a huge saver for storage costs as well as making remote monitoring easier and large scale VSaaS more feasible. In the mean time, 'smart codecs' for H.264, have come out, which also offer significant bandwidth savings (e.g., see our Axis Zipstream test).

We tested H.265 cameras from Samsung and Vivotek to understand:

  • Bandwidth tradeoff / savings compared to current H.264 camera models widely used (e.g., IP Camera Bandwidth / Storage Shootout).
  • CPU Load tradeoffs vs H.264 for viewing
  • VMS support for H.265
  • Finally, H.265 vs Smart Codecs such as Axis Zipstream

We performed both technical stream analysis and image quality comparisons to understand quality and bandwidth tradeoffs.

******* **** * *****, ************ *** **** ******** *** *.*** ** *******. *******, H.265 ******* *** ******** ** **** **** ******** ************* ** North *******.

*** ******* ** ~**% ********* ********* *****, ** ****, ***** be * **** ***** *** ******* ***** ** **** ** making ****** ********** ****** *** ***** ***** ***** **** ********. In *** **** ****, '***** ******' *** *.***, **** **** out, ***** **** ***** *********** ********* ******* (*.*.,*** *** **** ********* ****).

** ****** *.*** ******* **** ******* *** ******* ** **********:

  • ********* ******** / ******* ******** ** ******* *.*** ****** ****** widely **** (*.*.,** ****** ********* / ******* ********).
  • *** **** ********* ** *.*** *** *******
  • *** ******* *** *.***
  • *******, *.*** ** ***** ****** **** ** **** *********

** ********* **** ********* ****** ******** *** ***** ******* *********** to ********** ******* *** ********* *********.

[***************]

Key ********

*** / ***, ***** *** *.*** ******* ******* ******* ** no ********* ******* ******** ** ****** / ******* *.*** *******. Worse, **** ********* (* ***** ***** *.*** **************) ********* ************* better **** *.***. ******* *********, *** ******* ***** *** ** very ******* *** ** *** **** * ***-******* ***** ** increase ** *** **** **** ***** *.***.

** ** *** *** ******* *** * ******** ** * tech **** *********, ***** *.*** ******* **** **** **** ** they *** **** ** ******* ******* *******. *******, **** ***** no **** ******** **** ******* ************ *.*** ** ******* *** have ******* ********** ** *** ******* *** *** ****.

Warning: *.*** **** *******

**** **** *.*** *********** ********** / ************* *** ****** **** the ***** (*.*., **** *.*** ******* ** *****'* *.*** *******), we ****** *** **** *** *.***. ** ** ***** **** early ** *** ********* *** *.*** ****, *** *******, *** of *** ******* **** / *********** *********, ********* ***** *** shipping ***** *.*** *** (*** ************* ** **** **** ****** tested **** *** ***** *********). ******* *** ************* ******** **** these *******, ** ** ******** / ****** **** ** *** next *** *****, *.*** **** ***** *********** ************ **** *** current ****** *********.

**** **** ******: *** ******* ****** ** ****** ** ***** 'original' *.*** ********. ******* ** *** ********* *** *.*** ******* that *** ******* ***** ****** (***** ********* ****: ***********) ***** they ***** ************* ******* *********. ** **** ** **** **** and **** **** ****** **** ******.

H.265 ****** ******** **********

** ******* *** *.*** ******* **** ***** *******, ** *********** *********. ******* ***********, **** ******** ******** ******** ************ *********** *** ******* (****** AVInaptic **** *** ******* *.***/****), **** * ********* ******* ** I/B/P ***** *********, ** **** ** *** ******* ** **** detailed ******** *********** *** **** *****. ***** **** **** ** were **** ** ******* *** ************ ****** ** *.*** *** H.264 ******* **** *** *** *******, ***** ** *** ******* below.

** ****** *** ****** ** ******* *** ** **** *****:


Samsung *.*** ***** / *******

*******'* ***-*****'* *** ********* ** ****** ********* **** ******** *.*** models, **** *** *** *******:

  • *****, **** *********, *** ******* ** ****** ** *.*** ******** profile ** *******, **** ******* **** *** **** ** *.***. However, **** **** *.*** *** *** ** *** ** *******, viewed ******** ** *** *** *********, **** **** ******* *******, nor *** ** ** **** *** ********* ** **. ** may ** ****** *** ******* ********* ** *******'* *********** ******.
  • ******, **** ****** ******** ** ****** ** *** *********** ** a ******** ***** **** ***** ***. **** ******* ****** ******** a *-** ***** ** *********** ******. ******* **** ******, ***** is ** *** ** ******** ******* ******* ******* *.*** *** H.264 ** * ******** ************.

** ******* ****** ******* ************* ** **** *****:

Vivotek *.*** ***** / *******

******* ** *******, *** **** ** *** ******* ******-**'* *** interface ** ********* **** ******** ******, ***** **** *** ******* for *.*** (****** ******* ******* *.*** *** ***** ** ***** settings) *** ***** ****** **. ******* ****** *********, ***** ****** ** ****** * ***** ******** *** *********** adjusts *********** ** ****** ******* ***/** ***** ****. ** **** cover ***** ****** ** *********** ** **** ****** ** * separate ******.

**** **** ******* ******** ******* *** *** (**** ***** *********** level *** * ***) *** ***, ****** *******, ***** ******* direct ********** ** *.***/*.*** ** ******** ********.

** ******* ****** *** ******* *** ********* ** **** *****:

Compared ** *.*** ********** *******

** *** *****, *.*** ******** **** ******* ** ****** **** compared ** ******* *.*** ******. *** *******, *** ***** ***** shows *******'* *** ******-** (**** *.*** *** *.***) ******** ** Hikvision *** ****, **** *** ******* *** ** ~** ************. Vivotek's *.*** ****** *** ***** **** ********* *.*** **** ****** the ***, *** ****** **** **** **** *** ********* ** night.

************ *** ******* ******* **** ***** ***** ~** *, ** this ** **** ***** *** ********* **, **** ** *** to ******. *****, *.*** ******** *** ****** **** *********** *.*** bitrates. **** **** **** *** ***** ********* *** ** ~*.*** vs. *******'* ***, *** ***** ***** *******, ********** ** *****.

Compared ** **** *********

*.*** *** *** **** ******* ********** **** ***** ***** ****** II ***** *****, ***** ****** * ***** ******** **** *-** seconds ********* ** ******, *** *********** ****** ************ ** ****** objects. **** **** ****** **, *** ******* ******'* ******* ******* was ***** **** **** *** **** ***** **** ********* *** to *** ******** (******* *** ***, ********* "****"). *******, ******* still ****** ************* ** *****, **** * **/*, ***** ********* remained ***, ***** *.* **/*.

**** **** **** ********* ******* ***** *** ************ **** ***** measurements, ***** ** *** **** ****** **** ********* *** *********.

**** **** ** **** ** **** *******'* ***** ****** ** performance ** **** ****** ** * ****** ******.

CPU **** *********

*** *** ******* ******* (~* **/* *** *****), *.*** ******** was ******** **** ********* ********* **** *.***, **** ** *** and **** *** ***. **** *** **** **** ******* **** a ****** ****** ** **** ** ******** ************ *******. ***** measurements **** ***** ******* ******* *****, ****** ****** ********* ****** ******* ******:

*******, **** ******** ****** ** ***** ** ****** ** *** H.265 *******, *** ***** ****** *************, **** *.*** **** **** doubling *.*** ********* ***** ** * **** *** ** **** dedicated ***** ****. ***** ****** ****** ** ***** ********** ** performance, ** ****** ******** ***** **** **** *** *.*** *** no ****** **** *.*** ********.

***** ** *** ****:

  • *** *** **:*** **** **** *.* ***, * ** ***, ********** ****** Graphics
  • **** *** **: ***** **** **** **** ** *.* ***, 16 ** ***, *** ******* ** **** ********

VMS *******

** ** ***********, *.*** ******* **** *****-***** ***** ** ****. We **** **** ** ********* *.*** **** ******* *** **** the ******* *****. ****** *** ******* ***** ** *** *** provides **** *.***/***** *******. ******* ***** *** ****** *** *.*** for ****, *********, ******, ***., **** ** ***** *******, **** below.

********* *** ***** **** ****** ** **** *** ******* ** adding *******, *** ** ***** **** *****.

*******'* *** ***, ****, ******* *.*** ******* *** ********* ** their *** *******. *******'* *********/*** ******** ** *** ******* *.*** currently, *** ***** *********** ****** ******** **** ******* *** ***** clip *********.

Visual ***********

** ***** ***, ** *** ******* *********** ******* *.*** *** H.264 ***** ******* ************ ******. *** *******, **** ***** ***** the *** ****** **** ** **** (***** ***** *** **** size *******):

*.*** ** ** *** *****, *.*** ** *** ****, **** ~Q28 ** **** **********. ****** *********** *** *******, *** **** visible **** **** **********, ******* *.*** ******** ***** **% ***** than *.*** ** **** *****.

** **** *****, ** ***** *** *.*** ***** ******** (**** below) *** ******** ********* **** *.***, ****** *** ********* ******* are *****.

Future *******

** ****** *.*** *********** *** ****** ** ******* **** *** next *** *****, ****** ** ******* ** ** **** *** fast ** ********. ** *** ********, *.***, ********** **** *** broad ******* *** ***** *** ***********, ********* ** ** *** easy *** ***** ****** *** ****** ***********. ******, ** *** as***** *.***********, *.*** *** *** **** **** ***** *** **** ***** to **** (** **** ****).

Comments (16)

Yes, finally some real data. Thanks!

Question, although I understand the use in comparing h.265 to competitive h.264, the report doesn't mention the fact that in all cases h.265 had a lower bitrate than for h.264 cameras of the same brand.

For instance, the Daytime Vivotek h.265 bitrate was 33% less than its h.264 bitrate.

While no one should switch brands thinking that h.265 must be better, when choosing a model within a brand it certainly might be better, looking at the data.

"the report doesn't mention the fact that in all cases h.265 had a lower bitrate than for h.264 cameras of the same brand."

It's shown in all the charts. That noted, we do not emphasize it because it does not really impact the general question of whether H.265 is 'better' than H.264.

"when choosing a model within a brand it certainly might be better, looking at the data."

Yes, if you are locked in to using, e.g., the SNV-8081R, then yes H.265 saves on bandwidth, presuming you are using a VMS that supports H.265, the CPU load increase is not a practical issue, etc. Of course, you'd still probably do just as well selecting a 'regular' H.264 camera.

Outstanding write-up Ethan!

The Elecard video segment was a great presentation of the functional deltas (between codecs) for an average scene.

Thank you Ethan for answering the questions I've been wondering about the current performance of H.265 vs H.264 cameras.

On a side note, whereas the free AVInaptic is only available on Windows, I see that Elecard StreamEye is available for Mac OS X as well as Windows which is great. Elecard StreamEye isn't free but it looks like a great tool. Thank you for finding and sharing information about this new and useful tool.

Thanks! Much needed info and looking forward to the Vivotek Smart Stream II report.

Great information, thanks Ethan. Job well done

Has anyone looked at VP9 encoding? Heard some stuff mentioned over at Hacker News, not sure if the encoding has hit any commercial use, but I have read the encoding us supposed to be better than H.265

Write up on VP9 vs. H.265 vs. H.264

I have not heard any IP camera manufacturer talk about adopting VP9 so, whether it is good or bad, does not look like it will have any impact at least in our industry for the foreseeable future.

I PM'ed you as I think this conversation will be off topic from the main article. In any case, your findings seem to contradict another piece I had seen on BBC. I am not sure what criteria they had used to measure their findings, but it does seem to differ than the findings of your article.

Really good article, thanks Ethan!

hope they pull their finger out, I know the 12mp Dahua we're playing with really heats up, so hopefully some smarter encoding chips really make this work like it should

If a camera heats up now, the current HiSilcon H.265 Solution gets even hotter. Faster powerful processing tends to take more Power thus higher clocking SoC and so a bit more heat. Heat kills a product life time.

We all look forward to seeing neon glowing water cooled cameras with transparent cases showing the world we are being looked at! Maybe throw a few LEDs in for good measure. :-)

or, they'll move to a smaller process both saving on heat generated and energy used for the same workload...

However, when bitrates spiked at night in either of the H.265 cameras, CPU usage jumped significantly, with H.265 more than doubling H.264 processor usage in a high end PC with dedicated video card.

Were you using hardware based h.264 decoding, but software based h.265 decoding?

That could have something to do with it. There are some cards already that can do hardware based h.265, notably the GTX-960, and more coming everyday.

It would be interesting to see if that would narrow the gap much. Although, since most systems today don't have hardware based hevc decoding, I think that the real-world test should still be the software based decoding ones.

If you are wondering about how man enough you PC is for H.265 decoding, there is a tool that's been around to give some ideas on decode of 720p 1080p & 2160p. it's a reference benchmark using the open source ffmpeg library.

http://murobbs.muropaketti.com/threads/hevc-decode-benchmark.1188750/page-11

Sitr id in Finish language, a copy of the software is here on dropbox for you.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wu729gaysij2idj/HDBC-x64-V1.4_2.zip?dl=0

Now for die hard want to know more here is a few useful links:

4K playback for little cost nice posting.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/55784335

LAV Filters needed as shown above, allows windows media player for playback using hardware of your GFX card. ( stops that stutter! even in H.264 of course)
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=156191
https://github.com/Nevcairiel/LAVFilters/releases

Samples of 4K High bitrate H.265 Content. For testing your PC decoding abilities.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2014/11/19/samsung-nx1-4k-video-samples-and-new-full-res-frame-grabs-available-for-do

Free Video player for PC uses hardware of Graphics Card ( GPU )
https://mpv.srsfckn.biz/

Shows you technical details about your PC graphics decoding.
http://www.videohelp.com/software/DXVA-Checker

You can assume at time goes by older hardware is replaced, even as of 2015 GPUs from Intel Nvidia and I suspect AMD have both Encode / Decode of H.265 decoding naturally is where the CCTV CMS platforms will help.

Update: The Samsung camera we tested is their 'original' H.265 offering. Samsung is now releasing new H.265 cameras that now include smart codecs (their marketing term: SmartStream) which they claim significantly reduces bandwidth. We plan to test them and then will update this report.

Yes, i was just thinking what is the difference between H.264 and H.265 . Good article

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Cisco Meraki New Cameras and AI Analytics on Dec 14, 2018
Meraki has released their second generation of video surveillance with 3 new cameras, AI-based video analytics, and 2 cloud-based storage...
FLIR Launches Body Cameras Unified With VMS (TruWitness) on Dec 11, 2018
While FLIR is best known for their thermal cameras, now they have expanded into body cameras, launching TruWITNESS, a public safety focused body...
Ubiquiti $79 Flex IP Camera Tested on Dec 07, 2018
U.S. Manufacturer Ubiquiti has released a 1080p, integrated IR IP camera, selling it directly for $79, making this one of the least expensive IP...
Infinova's Xinjiang Business Examined on Dec 07, 2018
As pressure mounts for companies to stop doing business in China’s Xinjiang region amid a severe human rights crisis, IPVM has found Infinova sold...
VMS Live Monitoring Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone, Network Optix on Dec 05, 2018
Viewing live video is the first interaction and most common task most users have with a VMS. Who does it best and worst? Who offers the most...
Fullerton Returns, Joins OpenEye on Dec 04, 2018
Eric Fullerton became one of the most famous people in the industry as the Chief Sales and Marketing Officer of Milestone as Milestone became the...
Hanwha L Series Lowest-Cost Camera Tested on Dec 04, 2018
Hanwha has released their lowest-priced IP camera line ever, the L series, that competes on price with low cost competitors Dahua and...
Startup Qumulex Aims For Unified Platform, Adds Infinias Access Founder on Nov 29, 2018
The startup founded by former Exacq executives, Qumulex has hired Wayne Jared, founder of access control manufacturer Infinias and most recently a...
Vintra "AI-Powered" Video Analytics Startup Profile on Nov 27, 2018
Vintra is a Silicon Valley startup focused on AI-based video analytics. They had booths at IACP and ISC West demonstrating their hosted or...
Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2018 on Nov 26, 2018
This is the 5th year IPVM has tracked manufacturers gaining and losing: Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2014 Top Manufacturers Gaining and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference 2018 Review - ADT, Resideo, Alarm.com, Arlo, Eagle Eye, ACRE, More on Dec 14, 2018
Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference is an event matching industry executives with financiers that frequently leads to future funding...
Cisco Meraki New Cameras and AI Analytics on Dec 14, 2018
Meraki has released their second generation of video surveillance with 3 new cameras, AI-based video analytics, and 2 cloud-based storage...
Foolish Strategy: OEMing Facial Recognition on Dec 13, 2018
Almost as 'hot' as face recognition marketing right now is OEMing facial recognition. Last year, they were a who's who of company's with...
DVR Examiner - Video Recovery from Recorder Hard Drives on Dec 13, 2018
Bypassing passwords and long download times on-site, DVR Examiner collects and organizes video evidence directly from a hard drive extracted from...
2019 Access Control Book Released on Dec 12, 2018
This is the best, most comprehensive access control book in the world, based on our unprecedented research and testing has been significantly...
Huawei Hisilicon Quietly Powering Tens of Millions of Western IoT Devices on Dec 12, 2018
Huawei Hisilicon chips are powering, at least, tens of millions of Western IoT devices, such as IP cameras and surveillance recorders, a fact that...
FLIR Launches Body Cameras Unified With VMS (TruWitness) on Dec 11, 2018
While FLIR is best known for their thermal cameras, now they have expanded into body cameras, launching TruWITNESS, a public safety focused body...
Startup Sunflower Labs' Autonomous Drone Security System on Dec 11, 2018
Startup Sunflower Labs is claiming a unique design on a home security system, combining autonomous drones and 'Sunflower' sensors. Imagine an...
The 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide on Dec 10, 2018
The 300 page, 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide, covers the key events and the future of the video surveillance market, is now available,...
Multi-Factor Access Control Authentication Guide on Dec 10, 2018
Can a stranger use your credentials? One of the oldest problems facing access control is making credentials as easy to use as keys, but restricting...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact