Guard Fired For Reporting Surveillance Sexual Harassment

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Jan 10, 2014

A guard is fired after reporting misconduct by another guard monitoring surveillance cameras. Now the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is suing on his behalf. Here is the full complaint.

Christopher Smith worked as a security guard for Guardsmark watching over a General Dynamics facility in Warren, Michigan, but was fired after he told a woman she was being sexually harassed via security camera.

“On a number of occasions, Smith observed a coworker using the security cameras to zoom in on women’s private parts,” according to the lawsuit. He complained to the coworker, but the coworker wouldn’t stop. Smith told one of the women what was going on, and she filed a sexual harassment complaint. Guardsmark fired him two days later.

Smith filed a complaint with the EEOC saying he was terminated because he opposed sexually inappropriate behavior in the workplace. The EEOC says this is a case of retaliation and that Smith was deprived of equal employment opportunities and filed the suit on Christmas Eve.

"Title VII protects employees from being retaliated against for opposing sexual harassment even if they complain to someone else, like a co-worker or client," said Nedra Campbell, trial attorney for the EEOC in a prepared statement. "Employees like Smith who oppose the illegal acts of a co-worker should be commended, not fired."

The agency is suing for past and future wages for Smith and punitive damages and asking for an injunction barring Guardsmark from “perpetuating a sexually hostile work environment, and retaliating against any individual who opposes sex discrimination and/or a sexually hostile work environment.”

It is not clear whether the guard who was controlling the surveillance system was disciplined or the disposition of the female employee's sexual harassment complaint. A security officer at the site said Smith was terminated before he started there, but he was not aware of any other firings since then.

Emails and calls to Guardsmark about the suit went unreturned.

Serious **** *** ************ *********

******** ***** ** ************ *******, ********** **** **** **** ************, to ***** *** **** ** *******, **** *** ************ ** male ************ *********, ***** ***** *** ********, *** **** ** this ** ****. ** ******* **** ** ****** ****** *******, though **** ** ****** ***** **** ****** ** ****** ******* what *** ************ ********* *** **********. ** *******, **** ***** standard ********* ********** ****** ** ********* *** ********* **-**********, ********** to *** ********* **** **** **** *** ** ********* ** all.

Comments (9)

"**** *** ************ ** **** ************ *********, ***** ***** *** immature"

* ** **** ** *** **** ***** ****** ** * that's * ****** ********* ******* *********.

****, ** *** ***** *** ***** ** *** *** *** a **** ** *** ******** *** ********** ** **** *** offending **-******. *** *** ***** *** *** *** ** ***** have **** ***** ** ************* ********** *** ***** ******** ** the ***** ******* ****** ********** * ****** ** ******* *** issue. ** (********* ** *** *********** *****, ***** *****'* *** he ***) *** *** **** ********** ** *********** ** *********** the ********* **********. ** ** ******, *** ** ******* **** Guardsmark ** **** *** ******** ***** **** ** ** **** discpline **** ******* **** **** *****, **** ***'* *** **** they *** ** **, ******* **** *****'* ***** *** ******.

** ***** ******** *** ***** ** *** *********, *** ******* was ****, **** ***** ** *** *****. *** ** ******** is *** ** *** ********* *********** ***** *** ** ******?

** (********* ** *** *********** *****, ***** *****'* *** ** did) *** *** **** ********** ** *********** ** *********** *** situation **********. ** ** ******, *** ** ******* **** ********** if **** *** ******** ***** **** ** ** **** ********* such ******* **** **** *****, **** ***'* *** **** **** did ** **, ******* **** *****'* ***** *** ******.

** ***** ******** *** ***** ** *** *********, *** ******* was ****, **** ***** ** *** *****. *** ** ******** is *** ** *** ********* *********** ***** *** ** ******?

**** ********* *** ***** *** **** **** ********* ********** *****, but **** *****'* ********* ***. *******, **** ** ****, ******** regulations ******* ** ******** **** *********** ** ****** *** **** report *** ***** **. **** ***'* *** *** ******* *** to ** ******** ** * ********** ** ***** ** ** a ****** ***** ** ******* (******** **** *** **** ******).

"**** *** ************ ** **** ************ *********, ***** ***** *** immature"

* ** **** ** *** **** ***** ****** ** * that's * ********************** *********.

* ***** **** **** **. ** ** * **** **** * predominance ** ************ ****************. ** ** ** *********** ******* ************* *** ***** *** ********.

****, ** **, ********* *** ****. **** ****** ****** / do *** **** *** *********** ******* ****** ******* ** ***** personal **** *** **** **** ** **** **** *** ** duty.

** *** ********* **'** *********** ** ***:

****** ********,******* ******** ********, *** ******** *** **** ****, *** ***** **.

********** ********,********* *********,**** **** ** *** *** ********* ********* **** ****** ******* cops.

*** ****** ***** *** **** **** **** *** ******* ******** have ***** ******* ******* ** ***** ****** ********* ***** ***** them. ** ***** *** ** ** ** **** ****** *** it ** ******* ********* **** **** ** **** **** *** see **** ******* *** ******* **** *** ******* ** ********** after *** ****.

** ******* **** ** ****** ****** *******, ****** **** ** detect ***** **** ****** ** ****** ******* **** *** ************ operators *** **********.

******** *** ***** ****** ** * ***************** ** ***** ** **** ****** ** ** **** *** motion ******, ******* ***********************. ******* ***** ****** ** ******** *** **** **** **** of ********, ***** ********* **** '*** **** *** **** *********' or '******* ***** ********'.

**** ** ** *** ****** ******* **** *** ** **** to * ******** *****, **** ***** ** * *********** **** of ***** *** ****** *** ******** ******* *** *** ******** video **** **** ******* *******!

*

**** ******* ** ** ** ******* **** **** ***** ******, yet ** ****** ** ***** ** *** ******** ******. * want ** ** **** ** ***** *** ******** ***********. **** the ******** **** ** *** **** ********* ***** ** ** broken.

** ***** **** / *** ******** **** ***** *******. **** was ******* ** ** **** ******** ********* *** ***** ** Carlton ** *** ******* ********.

****'* ************ **** ** *** **** *********.

*** ***** *** ******* ***** ******: **** *********, ***** ********? - *** ****** *** ******?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

Camio Natural Language Processing Tested on Sep 27, 2016
The ex-Googler led team from Camio has advanced its video monitoring offering to include natural language processing. Camio ingests video,...
Hacked Dahua Cameras Drive Massive Cyber Attack on Sep 27, 2016
Cyber attacks are accelerating and IP cameras are behind many of them. Worse, last week, a 'massive' attack was carried out using numerous Dahua...
Axis Secretly Paid Anixter Sales People To Push Axis NVRs on Sep 26, 2016
Internal Axis communication shows how Axis paid Anixter and Tri-Ed sales people with secret bonuses to push Axis NVRs. In this report, we examine...
VLANs for Video Surveillance on Sep 26, 2016
Many people confidently say to 'use VLANs' as an answer to IP video networking problems and as a way to signal expertise. But how should VLANs be...
Ambarella CEO Admits H.265 and 4K Not Popular on Sep 26, 2016
Ambarella is the main chip provider for high-end surveillance cameras driving higher resolution and new CODECs. While Ambarella has been pushing...
Nest Cam Outdoor Tested on Sep 23, 2016
After years of claiming an outdoor model was "coming", addressing their biggest user demand, Nest has finally released their Outdoor Camera, an...
ACTi Refuses Race To The Bottom, Shifts To Solutions on Sep 23, 2016
The original low cost IP camera disruptor was ACTi. Back in the 2008 - 2010 time frame, Taiwanese manufacturer ACTi challenged the Western and...
You Get Robbed, Canary Will Pay You Up To $1,000 on Sep 22, 2016
Canary is trying to break the status quo in DIY security, first by raising over $40 million, and now a revamp of their monthly services package...
Milestone Ends Development of "Enterprise" VMS on Sep 22, 2016
Milestone 'Enterprise' was one of the first enterprise video management software offerings, selected by many early adopters of IP video. However,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact