"Future-Proofing" Access Control Guide

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jul 30, 2015

Its one of the most misused phrases around: "Future-proof". However, even without the crystal ball and wizards, designing access control to be "future proof" is much more pratical that the concept implies.

The features we tag as 'future proof' are:

OSDP
Smartcard Frequencies
Door Controllers
Third Party Controllers

While we explain why these products or features should be avoided:

ONVIF C
125 kHz Cards
Combo Readers and Controllers
Mobile Credentials

Inside, we explain the pros or cons of each technology and how following these guidelines can save you thousands or more.

*** *** ** *** most ******* ******* ******: "Future-proof". *******, **** ******* the ******* **** *** wizards, ********* ****** ******* to ** "****** *****" is **** **** ******** that *** ******* *******.

*** ******** ** *** as '****** *****' ***:

****
********* ***********
**** ***********
***** ***** ***********

***** ** ******* *** these ******** ** ******** should ** *******:

***** *
*** *** *****
***** ******* *** ***********
****** ***********

******, ** ******* *** pros ** **** ** each ********** *** *** following ***** ********** *** save *** ********* ** more.

[***************]

** *** ******** *****, we ******** *** ****** technologies ** ***** *** avoid *** *** **** results *** ***** ** come.

*****

*****, **** *** *** technologies ** *** ** your ****** ******, *** why *** ******:

****: * *** ******** **** resolves ************ ******** *************** between *********** *** ******* is ****. *** ******** is ****** ** * replacement *** ******* ** offering ********** **** **********, two-way *************, *** *********** more ********** ****, ******. (For **** ******, *** our ******* ** **** ****) ********, ***** *** protocol ** ***** ***, adoption ** ******** ****** has **** ********** **** leading ********* ** **** the ****** *** *********** side ******* ******** **.
**.** *** ***********: ***** *** ***, the ****** *** **** slow ** ******* ** the ****** *********, **** secure '*********' ********* ******. However, ** **** **********, the ************ ** ***** formats ******* **** ********* *** expensive [**** ** ****** available], ******** ***** *****. With ********** ******* ******* ******** *** *********** ********* *** **.** MHz *******, ******** ****** changeovers **** ******** *** format ***.
************* ***********: ** *** ****, the **** ****** ************ for ****** *** ** use *** ***** ** control **** ** **** doors, ********* ** **** as** ** *** ********* ** **** *********** **** controllers ******** (*** *** *********** ******* ******? ******** ****** *** *** *******). However, **** *** ******** and ************ ** ** networks ****** ****** **********, adding * '***** **********' at *** **** ** not * ********* *** offers ******* ** ******** in ******** ***** *** installation ***** ** * few **** ****** **** homerun ** ******* *******.
*** ***** ********: ***** '***********' ****** be ********** ******** **** access, ************ *** ** lessened ** ******** ******** controllers **** *** ** used ** ******** *******. Options *** ************* ******* are ******* ** *** three ***** ********* *** controllers ** **** ** our **** ** *** ** Mercury ****** *********** ****. ** ******* **** hardware **** *** ** these ********* ********* *** multiple ********** ******** ******* to ***** **** ** the ******* ****** ** failing ** *** *** job **** ** **** out ** ********.

*****

*** **** *** *** technologies ** ***** ***** of *** *** ******* why:

***** ******* *: ******* ******** ********* early, *****'* ****** **************** guideline *** ******* **** no *********** ********* ***** **** released ***** ***** *** years ***. *** ******* outlook *** ***** *** other **************** ********* ** grim **** ****** ****** traction, ******** ** *** ****** ****************: ***** ******* ****.
*** *** ***********: ***** ***** ** older, **** *********, *********** contactless *********** ***** *** 125 *** *********. ******* YouTube ***** **** ** videos ********* *** ** use $** ******* **** widely ********* ******, **** endusers *** *********** ***** are ******** ** ** the *** ** ***** systems. ** *** **** ************** ****** ******* *********** ******, * ******** **% still **** *** **** their ********* ******. *******, with ***** *** *** kHz ***** *** ******* typically ***** ** **** **** **.** MHz ********, ***** ** little ****** ** ******** using ****.
***** ***********: ***** ************* *********** make **** *****, *** idea *** ** ***** too ***, ** ** frequently *** **** ** combining *** ********** **** the ******. *** ***** weakness ** *** ******** is *** ************* **** hanging *** ***** ** the ********* **** ** the **** ******* *** opening - *** ********** area ******** - ** great **** ** ********* threats. ** ****** *** risk ** ********* *******: ***** ****** / *********** ******** ****.
****** ***** ***********: *** ****** ************ have ****** *** **** of ********** ***********. *** slick ******* ** ****** users ****** ***** *********** in ***** ** * reader ******* ** * stale, ****** ** **** may **** *** ***** tradeshow ****, *** ******** to ****** ** ********* and ****** *** *********** problems, **** *** ******* smartphone ***** **** ** letting ********* ****** ****** settings, *** *********** *** provisioned, *** ******* ** not ***** **** ** carry ***** ****** *** picture ***. ** ******* these ***** ***** ** our ***: *** ***** *** Primetime ****, *** **** **** apply ** *** (********* *** ******) for ****** ** ****.

Cost *******

*** ***** ****** ****** ****** of ***** ********* ** sunstantial, *** ***** ********* and *** ***** *** save ********* ** '****** right' *******.

*** *******, * '******** upgrade' ** *********** *********** instead ** ******* ******** 3rd ***** ******** *** amount ** **** $**** per **** **** ******* *** additional *********** *** ************ labor. *** **** ** upgrading * ****** ** work **** **.** *** smartcards *** ** $*** per ****** *** $** per **** *** **** user **** ******** *** kHz ******* *** ************ by *** ****** [**** no ****** *********].

Comments (3)

sundar Subramanian

08/05/15 09:45am

Brian,

as you mentioned OSDP is future of Standard Access Control Protocol [like, Currently Wiegand]. I wish it will, as Biometric reader needs two way data transfer and it is not possible through existing wiegand protocol.

But, still I have not seen/heard installations of different reader with third party panel over OSDP due to it's lower acceptance in access control manufacturer.

Like ONVIF, is there any specific group of manufacturer or organization which is promoting OSDP ?

On which basis we can predict, other manufacturers will include OSDP in their future products ?

Brian Rhodes

IPVMU Certified | In reply to sundar Subramanian | 08/05/15 02:02pm

Hello Sundar:

Good question. OSDP is promoted by SIA.

Unlinke ONVIF C, their efforts have added access manufacturers with considerable marketshare, including Mercury Security and HID Global (who co-authored the protocol). The member list also includes Axis, Siemens, Identive, Nedap, and Brivo.

It's not comprehensively adopted like Weigand, but the list of OSDP supported devices is growing with each new product release cycle.

In terms of current, real support, controllers like the Mercury EP1501/02, Axis A1001 and readers like HID's iClass SE series provide the option to connect with OSDP. Again, not comprehensive, but those components are widely adopted by a large number of systems today.

Jonathan Lawry

Trecerdo, LLC | In reply to Brian Rhodes | 08/07/15 02:11pm

It's important to point out here and say that OSDP and ONVIF C are apples & oranges. ONVIF C is a controller protocol. OSDP is a reader device protocol. While I know this is obvious, it is essentially the reason why OSDP is getting traction and ONVIF C is not.

People lament that ONVIF C hasn't caught on for access, as other ONVIF profiles have for video. I think the reason for this is that a controller is more analogous to a VMS than a camera. Does anyone use ONVIF above the VMS? Didn't think so.

So OSDP is catching on more than ONVIF C because of the role of readers is fairly well defined, as is that of cameras. In contrast, any value-add or differentiator at the controller level will have to be added to ONVIF C. Think of all the different ways you have seen controllers do access levels, triggers and procedures, etc. I think it has a tough road ahead.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,379 reports, 860 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Related Reports

Door Position Switches (DPS) For Access Control Tutorial on Mar 05, 2018

Door position switches do not get enough respect. They solve a major problem of access control systems yet are frequently ignored or...

Fail Safe vs. Fail Secure Tutorial on Oct 02, 2019

Few terms carry greater importance in access control than 'fail safe' and 'fail secure'. Access control professionals must know how these...

Contactless Access Credentials Guide on Oct 29, 2018

Contactless credentials are the most common component used in an access control system and while many look alike externally, important differences...

Assa Aperio Wireless Access Reader R100 Tested on Aug 23, 2018

Wireless access control is frequently promoted by manufacturers as a way to cut installation costs. Perhaps the biggest proponent of this is mega...

Cybersecurity for IP Video Surveillance Guide on May 18, 2018

Keeping surveillance networks secure can be a daunting task, but there are several methods that can greatly reduce risk, especially when used in...

Exacq M Series Low Cost NVR Tested on Oct 12, 2017

With recent cyber security issues hitting NVRs and cameras from low cost leaders Dahua and Hikvision, users are increasingly seeking alternatives...

Biometrics Pros and Cons For Electronic Access Control on Jun 26, 2017

Biometrics has been long sought as an alternative to the security risks of cards, pins and passwords. While biometrics has improved somewhat over...

Smart Codec Guide on Feb 01, 2018

"Smart Codec" was once seemingly a marketing buzzword, but in 2020, nearly all new camera models include this tehcnology. These marketing names...

Breaking Into A Facility Using Canned Air Tested on Jan 28, 2020

Access control is supposed to make doors more secure, but a $5 can of compressed air may defeat it. With no special training, intruders can...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon ACC Cloud Tested on Jul 08, 2020

Avigilon merged Blue and ACC, adding VSaaS features to its on-premise VMS, offering remote video and health monitoring that was previously limited...

The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020

The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020, with Congress members and activists speaking out against it while video...

Sperry West / Alibaba Tablet Temperature Measurement Tested on Jul 07, 2020

In April, we ordered a ~$500 temperature tablet from Alibaba. We set it to the side while doing 18 other temperature screening tests but, after...

Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators on Jul 07, 2020

While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of security systems integrators shows weak sales, opposition to...

Video Surveillance 101 Book Released on Jul 07, 2020

IPVM's unique introduction to video surveillance series is now available as a 145-page eBook. Designed for managers, salespeople, and engineers new...

Startup Duranc Presents AI VSaaS on Jul 06, 2020

Duranc presented its system at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from Duranc including IPVM Q&A Background on the...

Low Voltage Nation Wants to "Help You Carve Out A Fulfilling Career" Interviewed on Jul 06, 2020

It is difficult to make your way in this industry as there is little formal schooling. However, one person, Blake Urmos, the Founder of Low Voltage...