Free Wireless Surveillance for Cities?

Author: John Grocke, Published on Aug 14, 2013

Many IPVM end user members have reached out to us asking about a company offering wireless surveillance that sounds almost too good to be true. While most systems cost $10,000+ per camera, this company is offering it for more than 80% less, plus free infrastructure if the city can get a few businesses to buy cameras. How is this company doing that? Is it too good to be true? In this note, we examine the offerings of WildFire Connections.

WildFire's WPI Plan

*** ***** ** ***** *******, ******** ****** **** **** ***** "*** ****", ** *********** **** private ****** *******, * ******** ***** ************ ****** *** ** ******** at "********* ** **** ** *** **** ** ****** **********".  The **** ********** ** **** **** ******** ******** ******* *** purchased ** * **** ** $*,***-*,*** ****. ********'* ***** ****** that ** *** ******* ****** ********* *** ** *** *******, ***** is ** **** ** *** **** ** ******. ******** ******** *** wireless **************, ******* *** *** ******* ***** ***** ** *** network. *** * ***** **** ** * ****** ****** **** no ******, **** ** ** ******** ********. 

**** *******

**** ******** **** ********, *** ***** ***** ** *** ** that *** ***** ****** ****** ** *** ******* ************. **** confirmed **** * ******* *-****** **** ****** *** * ***** town ********* ***** ******* $**,*** *** $**,*** ***** *********. ** the ******* ****** ********* *** *******, **** ***** ***** ***** about $*,*** ** $**,*** ** ************ ***** ********, ***** ** not ******* "********* ** ****". *** **** ** ****** ***** **** to ****** **** **** ** **** ********** *******. ***** ***** not ******** ** **** ** *** **** ******* *****, ********, conditioned ***** *** ***, ******** ****** **** * ****** ** address, *** * ******** ****** ***** ******** **** ** * tall ******** ** ***** ***** *** * *** ******** *******'* main ***** *****. 

***** **** ****, ******** **** *** ********* *** ******* *****, VMS *** *** *** **** ********'* ********* *** ** ***** to *** *******. ************, ******** ******* ******** **** *** ***** police or *******'* ********** *** ****** ****** ** *** ****** ** order ** ******* *** **** ****, *** **** *********** *** be ******.    


******** ****** *** ******** **** ******* ** * **** ***** pole

System *******

*** ******** ****** ***************** ***** *** ********, ******* **** * *** **-***** ****** (included **** *** **** ****) ******** ** ****** * ******* for ** ****. **** ***** ***** *** ******* **-*****: * 2MP ******** ***** ****** *** $*,*** *** * ** ******** PTZ *** $*,***.

*** **** ****** ******** ******* *** ***** ***** ******** ** a ******* ***** *********** ***** ** * **** ******** ** a ***** ***** *********** *********** ***** ** *** ****** *********, **** **** * ****** **** of ***** **** ** *** ******* *****. *** ************* **** have **** ** ***** ** ******** ****** **** ******* ********* or ***** *********, ******** **** ****** * ******** ******* ******** using ***** ****** ** ******** ********* ** ******** ** *** well-suited *** ***** ************ *** ********** ***** *** ********.

**** *** ******* ***** ** ** ********, ******** **** *********** the ******* *** *** ********* ** ****** ** **** ** the ********* ******* *****, ** *** ******** **** *** ******** the *******. * "****** *******" *** ****** **** ** **** video ** ******* ******** **** *** **** ****. ******** ******** the ****** ** *** *** *** ******* *** ***** *** system ************* ******* ** ***** ******* ********** ******. **** ***** maintenance *****, *** *** *** ******** ** ** *********. ******** ******** a *** **** ******** ** *** *********.


******** ******* ***** ****** ******* ** * ***** *****

************

******* ** ***** ********, ******** ************ ***** ****** ************* ** local ******** ********* *** ***** * ********** **-**** *** ****** commissioning. ******** **** ******** * **-*** ******** ** ************ *****. Subcontracted ************* ****** *** *** **** ** *** ******* ****, especially **** *** ********** ** ******** ************. * **** ** county ********** * ******** ****** ***** ** **** ** ********* inspect *** ************ *** **** **** **** *** ************ *** ********* quickly ****** *** ***** ***** ******** *******.

Scale ***********

*****, ********* *** ***** *** ******* *** * **** **** surveillance ******, ******** **** ****** *****. **** '***' ** *** a ******** *** ****. *** **** *****, **** **** ********* mesh ******** ** ***** ***** ******* ***** ** ********.

******

*** ******* **** ** *** ****** ***'* "****" **** ************ and **** ** **** ******* ****** *** ******** **, *** it ***** *** ** **********. *******, ** ** ** ***** as * *-****** ******** ****** *** ** **** * ******** of *****, ********, *** *********** ******* ** ******* *******. *** ** agency **** * ******* ******, **** *** ** * ****** option *** ***** ** ***** ***** ****** ********** *** *******, *** ** ***** **** * **** ** ***** **** to * *********** ******. *** ********, **'* ** *********** ** get ***** **** ** *** **** **** * **** ** county *** ** ****-********** *** ****** ********* *** ********.

Comments (9)

Sounds like a great idea for small towns imho.

Why do I get the feeling there's a deeper "catch" to all this? I'm the last one to buy into conspiracy theories, but somehow I foresee some kind of trick "gotcha" scenario with all this... nothing SINISTER per se, but...

Ever see the movie "The Net"?

Margarita, The thing to me is that once the fine print is considered -- LoS only, Ubiquiti, installation paid separately, restrictions on adding other devices -- it's an approach that most local integrators could take for a similar price and functionality.

"Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications"

Why is this?

Because Ubiquiti is not designed to be a large scale city wide system for dozens or hundreds of cameras across a city.

Ganna have to agree on J-Hon's statement here. Ubiquiti may be alright for a couple of cams in a small residential, cost cutting project, however, in city deployments with public safety on the line, you gotta bring out the right stuff. By this I mean intelligent, wireless routers capable of the forwarding rates and bandwidth that the latest megapixel, multi-imager and PTZ cams require. You also want the ability to choose your camera make and model to suit the application. With this, you will find that each camera and VMS combination behave differently, and each combination have varying “levels” of sensitivity to latency in the network. Some combinations can tolerate moderate latency and packet retransmission while others are intolerant and will behave erratically – image artifacts, disconnections, etc. So it becomes necessary to have tight control over your wireless network, with high configurability and be able to adapt to changes in the RF environment to suit the project. Cannot stress enough the importance of proper engineering of these projects.

Bottom line, wireless deployments aren’t trivial, so align yourself with companies that understand this and can deliver results, not promises.

Side note: Starting at 00:39 in the video – I don’t see 30FPS in those images. Do you?

I'm actually going to step in on the opposite side of this argument. While I wouldn't ever run 100 cameras on Ubiquiti (I might not even run 10), I think for a small, and I mean small town (5000 people or so) who wants to run four cameras, why not Ubiquiti?

If these towns have the option of something (Ubiquiti and low cost cameras) for $200 per link plus $1600 per camera (plus install) versus nothing (because they can't afford $3000 links and cameras), why would the not take the low cost option? Especially if Wildfire is including maintenance on this gear.

The phrase "Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications" is in the context of large scale applications (see the original text). We are not objecting to Ubiquiti for a handful of cameras. The point is about end users being realistic and not thinking they can throw out dozens of Ubiquiti nodes and cover their whole city like it was no big deal.

Mike - the shots on the monitoring screens didn't look like 30fps to me either, although WildFire emphasized 30fps at least twice in the video.

Piping five 2MP cameras @ 30fps across five nanostations to a central point might create some network congestion/latency. The most I have ever done successfully with Ubiquiti is 6 but at much lower frame rate and resolution.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Pole Mount Camera Installation Guide on Apr 11, 2019
Poles are a popular but challenging choice for deploying surveillance cameras outdoors. Poles are indispensable for putting cameras at the right...
UK Installer CCTV Aware - Flat Pricing, No Salespeople on Apr 10, 2019
This is a different kind of company. They do flat pricing, they do not have any salespeople and 50% of their sales are sold and booked...
Spring 2019 IP Networking Course- Register Now on Apr 04, 2019
Register now for the Spring 2019 IP Networking course here. Just $299 for the course. This is the only networking course designed specifically...
Bezos-Funded Deep Sentinel Tested on Mar 28, 2019
Backed by Jeff Bezos, the Silicon Valley startup, Deep Sentinel, has declared: No One Does Home Security Like We Do Our Surveillance Team has...
Cambium Wireless Video Surveillance Profile on Mar 27, 2019
Cambium Networks, spun out of Motorola Solutions in 2011, says "outdoor durable radios are in their DNA" and they are targeting video surveillance...
Casino Security Consultant Carl Lindgren Interview on Mar 26, 2019
For more than 20 years, Carl Lindgren worked as a casino surveillance pro, while being active (and sometimes outspoken) on various online video...
Outdoor Camera Installation Guide on Mar 25, 2019
Outdoor camera installation can be fraught with problems. Creating a sturdy and weather tight mount is key for camera performance and longevity,...
Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...
Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Top Metrics For Ensuring Integrator Profitability - Statistics on Mar 20, 2019
How do integrators ensure the profitability of their projects? As part of our profitability study, 100+ integrators answered the following...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever. In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Strong ISC West 2019 For Manufacturers But Concerns For 2020 March Move on Apr 16, 2019
ISC West 2019 was strong for manufacturers, according to new IPVM survey results of 100+ manufacturers, consistent with 2018 results. However,...
Axis Supports HD Analog on Apr 15, 2019
In 2017, Axis declared 'Everything is IP': Now, in 2019, Axis has released support for HD analog, with their new encoders.  Why the change?...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...
Pole Mount Camera Installation Guide on Apr 11, 2019
Poles are a popular but challenging choice for deploying surveillance cameras outdoors. Poles are indispensable for putting cameras at the right...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact