Free Wireless Surveillance for Cities?

By: John Grocke, Published on Aug 14, 2013

Many IPVM end user members have reached out to us asking about a company offering wireless surveillance that sounds almost too good to be true. While most systems cost $10,000+ per camera, this company is offering it for more than 80% less, plus free infrastructure if the city can get a few businesses to buy cameras. How is this company doing that? Is it too good to be true? In this note, we examine the offerings of WildFire Connections.

WildFire's WPI Plan

*** ***** ** ***** website, ******** ****** **** **** their "*** ****", ** conjunction **** ******* ****** funding, * ******** ***** ************ system *** ** ******** at "********* ** **** to *** **** ** county **********".  *** **** commitment ** **** **** WildFire ******** ******* *** purchased ** * **** of $*,***-*,*** ****. ********'* video ****** **** ** the ******* ****** ********* *** of *** *******, ***** is ** **** ** the **** ** ******. WildFire provides *** ******** **************, central *** *** ******* relay ***** ** *** network. *** * ***** city ** * ****** agency **** ** ******, this ** ** ******** prospect. 

**** *******

**** ******** **** ********, the ***** ***** ** see ** **** *** above ****** ****** ** not ******* ************. **** confirmed **** * ******* 5-camera **** ****** *** a ***** **** ********* costs ******* $**,*** *** $18,000 ***** *********. ** the ******* ****** ********* the *******, **** ***** still ***** ***** $*,*** to $**,*** ** ************ costs ********, ***** ** not ******* "********* ** ****". The **** ** ****** would **** ** ****** this **** ** **** additional *******. ***** ***** not ******** ** **** of *** **** ******* poles, ********, *********** ***** for ***, ******** ****** with * ****** ** address, *** * ******** access ***** ******** **** as * **** ******** or ***** ***** *** a *** ******** *******'* main ***** *****. 

***** **** ****, ******** owns *** ********* *** network *****, *** *** NVR *** **** ********'* equipment *** ** ***** to *** *******. ************, WildFire ******* ******** **** the ***** ****** ** *******'* department *** ****** ****** to *** ****** ** order ** ******* *** this ****, *** **** requirement *** ** ******.    


******** ****** *** ******** node ******* ** * city ***** ****

System *******

*** ******** ****** ***************** ***** *** ********, coupled **** * *** PC-based ****** (******** **** the **** ****) ******** to ****** * ******* for ** ****. **** build ***** *** ******* in-house: * *** ******** fixed ****** *** $*,*** and * ** ******** PTZ *** $*,***.

*** **** ****** ******** network *** ***** ***** consists ** * ******* relay *********** ***** ** a **** ******** ** a ***** ***** *********** *********** ***** ** *** ****** locations, **** **** * direct **** ** ***** back ** *** ******* relay. *** ************* **** have **** ** ***** or ******** ****** **** require ********* ** ***** equipment, ******** **** ****** a ******** ******* ******** using ***** ****** ** wireless ********* ** ******** is *** ****-****** *** these ************ *** ********** ***** are ********.

**** *** ******* ***** to ** ********, ******** will *********** *** ******* and *** ********* ** needed ** **** ** the ********* ******* *****, as *** ******** **** not ******** *** *******. A "****** *******" *** patrol **** ** **** video ** ******* ******** with *** **** ****. WildFire ******** *** ****** of *** *** *** network *** ***** *** system ************* ******* ** their ******* ********** ******. They ***** *********** *****, but *** *** ******** ** be *********. ******** ******** a *** **** ******** on *** *********.


******** ******* ***** ****** mounted ** * ***** tower

************

******* ** ***** ********, WildFire ************ ***** ****** installations ** ***** ******** companies *** ***** * technician **-**** *** ****** commissioning. ******** **** ******** a **-*** ******** ** installation *****. ************* ************* always *** *** **** of *** ******* ****, especially **** *** ********** of ******** ************. * city ** ****** ********** a ******** ****** ***** be **** ** ********* inspect *** ************ *** make **** **** *** deficiencies are ********* ******* ****** the ***** ***** ******** expires.

Scale ***********

*****, ********* *** ***** are ******* *** * city **** ************ ******, covering **** ****** *****. This '***' ** *** a ******** *** ****. For **** *****, **** more ********* **** ******** or ***** ***** ******* would ** ********.

******

*** ******* **** ** the ****** ***'* "****" when ************ *** **** of **** ******* ****** are ******** **, *** it ***** *** ** economical. *******, ** ** as ***** ** * 5-camera ******** ****** *** be **** * ******** of *****, ********, *** proprietary ******* ** ******* *******. For ** ****** **** a ******* ******, **** may ** * ****** option *** ***** ** least ***** ****** ********** *** *******, *** ** ***** with * **** ** being **** ** * proprietary ******. *** ********, it's ** *********** ** get ***** **** ** the **** **** * city ** ****** *** be ****-********** *** ****** additions *** ********.

Comments (9)

Sounds like a great idea for small towns imho.

Why do I get the feeling there's a deeper "catch" to all this? I'm the last one to buy into conspiracy theories, but somehow I foresee some kind of trick "gotcha" scenario with all this... nothing SINISTER per se, but...

Ever see the movie "The Net"?

Margarita, The thing to me is that once the fine print is considered -- LoS only, Ubiquiti, installation paid separately, restrictions on adding other devices -- it's an approach that most local integrators could take for a similar price and functionality.

"Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications"

Why is this?

Because Ubiquiti is not designed to be a large scale city wide system for dozens or hundreds of cameras across a city.

Ganna have to agree on J-Hon's statement here. Ubiquiti may be alright for a couple of cams in a small residential, cost cutting project, however, in city deployments with public safety on the line, you gotta bring out the right stuff. By this I mean intelligent, wireless routers capable of the forwarding rates and bandwidth that the latest megapixel, multi-imager and PTZ cams require. You also want the ability to choose your camera make and model to suit the application. With this, you will find that each camera and VMS combination behave differently, and each combination have varying “levels” of sensitivity to latency in the network. Some combinations can tolerate moderate latency and packet retransmission while others are intolerant and will behave erratically – image artifacts, disconnections, etc. So it becomes necessary to have tight control over your wireless network, with high configurability and be able to adapt to changes in the RF environment to suit the project. Cannot stress enough the importance of proper engineering of these projects.

Bottom line, wireless deployments aren’t trivial, so align yourself with companies that understand this and can deliver results, not promises.

Side note: Starting at 00:39 in the video – I don’t see 30FPS in those images. Do you?

I'm actually going to step in on the opposite side of this argument. While I wouldn't ever run 100 cameras on Ubiquiti (I might not even run 10), I think for a small, and I mean small town (5000 people or so) who wants to run four cameras, why not Ubiquiti?

If these towns have the option of something (Ubiquiti and low cost cameras) for $200 per link plus $1600 per camera (plus install) versus nothing (because they can't afford $3000 links and cameras), why would the not take the low cost option? Especially if Wildfire is including maintenance on this gear.

The phrase "Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications" is in the context of large scale applications (see the original text). We are not objecting to Ubiquiti for a handful of cameras. The point is about end users being realistic and not thinking they can throw out dozens of Ubiquiti nodes and cover their whole city like it was no big deal.

Mike - the shots on the monitoring screens didn't look like 30fps to me either, although WildFire emphasized 30fps at least twice in the video.

Piping five 2MP cameras @ 30fps across five nanostations to a central point might create some network congestion/latency. The most I have ever done successfully with Ubiquiti is 6 but at much lower frame rate and resolution.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
Directory of 30+ VSaaS / Cloud Video Surveillance Providers on Jun 07, 2019
This directory provides a list of VSaaS / cloud video surveillance providers to help you see and research what options are available. 2019 State...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
IndigoVision Control Center VMS Tested on May 30, 2019
IPVM's last test of IndigoVision's VMS was in 2010, which found enterprise VMS features and a simple client interface. but no 3rd party camera...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs on Jun 17, 2019
Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still...
Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider Profile on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
NSA Director Keynoting Dahua and Hikvision Sponsored Cybersecurity Conference [Canceled] on Jun 13, 2019
The technical director for the NSA’s Cybersecurity Threat Operations Center will be keynoting a physical security cybersecurity conference that is...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact