Free Wireless Surveillance for Cities?

Author: John Grocke, Published on Aug 14, 2013

Many IPVM end user members have reached out to us asking about a company offering wireless surveillance that sounds almost too good to be true. While most systems cost $10,000+ per camera, this company is offering it for more than 80% less, plus free infrastructure if the city can get a few businesses to buy cameras. How is this company doing that? Is it too good to be true? In this note, we examine the offerings of WildFire Connections.

WildFire's WPI Plan

*** ***** ** ***** *******, ******** ****** **** **** ***** "*** ****", ** *********** **** private ****** *******, * ******** ***** ************ ****** *** ** ******** at "********* ** **** ** *** **** ** ****** **********".  The **** ********** ** **** **** ******** ******** ******* *** purchased ** * **** ** $*,***-*,*** ****. ********'* ***** ****** that ** *** ******* ****** ********* *** ** *** *******, ***** is ** **** ** *** **** ** ******. ******** ******** *** wireless **************, ******* *** *** ******* ***** ***** ** *** network. *** * ***** **** ** * ****** ****** **** no ******, **** ** ** ******** ********. 

**** *******

**** ******** **** ********, *** ***** ***** ** *** ** that *** ***** ****** ****** ** *** ******* ************. **** confirmed **** * ******* *-****** **** ****** *** * ***** town ********* ***** ******* $**,*** *** $**,*** ***** *********. ** the ******* ****** ********* *** *******, **** ***** ***** ***** about $*,*** ** $**,*** ** ************ ***** ********, ***** ** not ******* "********* ** ****". *** **** ** ****** ***** **** to ****** **** **** ** **** ********** *******. ***** ***** not ******** ** **** ** *** **** ******* *****, ********, conditioned ***** *** ***, ******** ****** **** * ****** ** address, *** * ******** ****** ***** ******** **** ** * tall ******** ** ***** ***** *** * *** ******** *******'* main ***** *****. 

***** **** ****, ******** **** *** ********* *** ******* *****, VMS *** *** *** **** ********'* ********* *** ** ***** to *** *******. ************, ******** ******* ******** **** *** ***** police or *******'* ********** *** ****** ****** ** *** ****** ** order ** ******* *** **** ****, *** **** *********** *** be ******.    


******** ****** *** ******** **** ******* ** * **** ***** pole

System *******

*** ******** ****** ***************** ***** *** ********, ******* **** * *** **-***** ****** (included **** *** **** ****) ******** ** ****** * ******* for ** ****. **** ***** ***** *** ******* **-*****: * 2MP ******** ***** ****** *** $*,*** *** * ** ******** PTZ *** $*,***.

*** **** ****** ******** ******* *** ***** ***** ******** ** a ******* ***** *********** ***** ** * **** ******** ** a ***** ***** *********** *********** ***** ** *** ****** *********, **** **** * ****** **** of ***** **** ** *** ******* *****. *** ************* **** have **** ** ***** ** ******** ****** **** ******* ********* or ***** *********, ******** **** ****** * ******** ******* ******** using ***** ****** ** ******** ********* ** ******** ** *** well-suited *** ***** ************ *** ********** ***** *** ********.

**** *** ******* ***** ** ** ********, ******** **** *********** the ******* *** *** ********* ** ****** ** **** ** the ********* ******* *****, ** *** ******** **** *** ******** the *******. * "****** *******" *** ****** **** ** **** video ** ******* ******** **** *** **** ****. ******** ******** the ****** ** *** *** *** ******* *** ***** *** system ************* ******* ** ***** ******* ********** ******. **** ***** maintenance *****, *** *** *** ******** ** ** *********. ******** ******** a *** **** ******** ** *** *********.


******** ******* ***** ****** ******* ** * ***** *****

************

******* ** ***** ********, ******** ************ ***** ****** ************* ** local ******** ********* *** ***** * ********** **-**** *** ****** commissioning. ******** **** ******** * **-*** ******** ** ************ *****. Subcontracted ************* ****** *** *** **** ** *** ******* ****, especially **** *** ********** ** ******** ************. * **** ** county ********** * ******** ****** ***** ** **** ** ********* inspect *** ************ *** **** **** **** *** ************ *** ********* quickly ****** *** ***** ***** ******** *******.

Scale ***********

*****, ********* *** ***** *** ******* *** * **** **** surveillance ******, ******** **** ****** *****. **** '***' ** *** a ******** *** ****. *** **** *****, **** **** ********* mesh ******** ** ***** ***** ******* ***** ** ********.

******

*** ******* **** ** *** ****** ***'* "****" **** ************ and **** ** **** ******* ****** *** ******** **, *** it ***** *** ** **********. *******, ** ** ** ***** as * *-****** ******** ****** *** ** **** * ******** of *****, ********, *** *********** ******* ** ******* *******. *** ** agency **** * ******* ******, **** *** ** * ****** option *** ***** ** ***** ***** ****** ********** *** *******, *** ** ***** **** * **** ** ***** **** to * *********** ******. *** ********, **'* ** *********** ** get ***** **** ** *** **** **** * **** ** county *** ** ****-********** *** ****** ********* *** ********.

Comments (9)

Sounds like a great idea for small towns imho.

Why do I get the feeling there's a deeper "catch" to all this? I'm the last one to buy into conspiracy theories, but somehow I foresee some kind of trick "gotcha" scenario with all this... nothing SINISTER per se, but...

Ever see the movie "The Net"?

Margarita, The thing to me is that once the fine print is considered -- LoS only, Ubiquiti, installation paid separately, restrictions on adding other devices -- it's an approach that most local integrators could take for a similar price and functionality.

"Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications"

Why is this?

Because Ubiquiti is not designed to be a large scale city wide system for dozens or hundreds of cameras across a city.

Ganna have to agree on J-Hon's statement here. Ubiquiti may be alright for a couple of cams in a small residential, cost cutting project, however, in city deployments with public safety on the line, you gotta bring out the right stuff. By this I mean intelligent, wireless routers capable of the forwarding rates and bandwidth that the latest megapixel, multi-imager and PTZ cams require. You also want the ability to choose your camera make and model to suit the application. With this, you will find that each camera and VMS combination behave differently, and each combination have varying “levels” of sensitivity to latency in the network. Some combinations can tolerate moderate latency and packet retransmission while others are intolerant and will behave erratically – image artifacts, disconnections, etc. So it becomes necessary to have tight control over your wireless network, with high configurability and be able to adapt to changes in the RF environment to suit the project. Cannot stress enough the importance of proper engineering of these projects.

Bottom line, wireless deployments aren’t trivial, so align yourself with companies that understand this and can deliver results, not promises.

Side note: Starting at 00:39 in the video – I don’t see 30FPS in those images. Do you?

I'm actually going to step in on the opposite side of this argument. While I wouldn't ever run 100 cameras on Ubiquiti (I might not even run 10), I think for a small, and I mean small town (5000 people or so) who wants to run four cameras, why not Ubiquiti?

If these towns have the option of something (Ubiquiti and low cost cameras) for $200 per link plus $1600 per camera (plus install) versus nothing (because they can't afford $3000 links and cameras), why would the not take the low cost option? Especially if Wildfire is including maintenance on this gear.

The phrase "Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications" is in the context of large scale applications (see the original text). We are not objecting to Ubiquiti for a handful of cameras. The point is about end users being realistic and not thinking they can throw out dozens of Ubiquiti nodes and cover their whole city like it was no big deal.

Mike - the shots on the monitoring screens didn't look like 30fps to me either, although WildFire emphasized 30fps at least twice in the video.

Piping five 2MP cameras @ 30fps across five nanostations to a central point might create some network congestion/latency. The most I have ever done successfully with Ubiquiti is 6 but at much lower frame rate and resolution.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Installation Hardware for Video Surveillance - Indoor Fasteners on Jun 22, 2018
As part of our Installation for Video Surveillance series, in this note, we cover drywall anchors. A key part of installing security hardware is...
Last Chance - Save $50 - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 21, 2018
Today, Thursday the 21st is the last chance to save $50 on registration. Register now and save. This is the only networking course designed...
Four Major Outdoor Camera Install Problems on Jun 14, 2018
Over 140 integrators told us the top four camera installation mistakes that lead to unexpected problems and failures. Their comments often...
Worst Features for Camera Installation (Statistics) on Jun 07, 2018
4 clear worst features for installing were identified by 140+ integrator respondents to: What feature(s) make a camera hard to install? The...
Top Features For Easy Camera Installation (Statistics) on Jun 05, 2018
Camera installation is the most fundamental and common task for video security technicians. Because of this, camera manufacturers market their...
Installing Box Cameras Indoors Tutorial on May 22, 2018
This tutorial starts our physical installation for video surveillance series, starting with Box Cameras, one of the oldest and most basic types....
Installing Cameras in Plenums Tutorial on May 15, 2018
There is often confusion about plenum ceilings, with misinformation about what is required when running cables through them and mounting cameras...
S2 Access Control / 'Unified Security Management' Profile on May 08, 2018
In our 13th access control company profile, we examine S2 Security's Netbox platform: Unified Security Management Platform positioning Core...
Measuring For Security Installation Guide on May 07, 2018
Accurate measurement is a fundamental skill, yet many installers do not know how to do it. Using these tools are a key skill needed for security...
IP Network Hardware for Surveillance Guide on May 02, 2018
Video surveillance systems depend on IP networking equipment. In this guide, we explain the key pieces of equipment and features, explaining where...

Most Recent Industry Reports

'Secure Channel' OSDP Access Control Examined on Jun 21, 2018
Despite claiming to be better than Wiegand, OSDP's initial releases did not address the lack of encryption between reader and controller, leaving...
Most Wanted Improvements In Manufacturer Technical Support (Statistics) on Jun 21, 2018
5 key areas of improvement and 1 clear wanted support feature were voiced by 140+ integrator responses to: What improvement in manufacturer...
Last Chance - Save $50 - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 20, 2018
Today, Thursday the 21st is the last chance to save $50 on registration. Register now and save. This is the only networking course designed...
GDPR / ICO Complaint Filed Against IFSEC Show Facial Recognition on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM has filed a complaint against IFSEC’s parent company UBM based on our concern that the conference violates core GDPR principles on...
IFSEC Final Show Report on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM is live from London reporting on the IFSEC show. The Chinese have taken over the UK, centered on Hikvision, flanked by Dahua, Huawei and a...
Mobotix Releases 'Move' Into 21st Century on Jun 20, 2018
For years, Mobotix stood resolutely against, well, every other manufacturer, selling it as a virtue: MOBOTIX equipment is designed with no...
Cybersecurity Startup VDOO Disclosing 10 Manufacturer Vulnerabilities Starting With Axis And Foscam on Jun 20, 2018
Cybersecurity startup VDOO has uncovered significant vulnerabilities in Axis cameras along with many others not yet disclosed. In this report, we...
Axis Guardian - Cloud VMS And Alarm Monitoring - Released on Jun 19, 2018
Axis has struggled to deliver a cloud-based managed service video platform. Video service providers have utilized AVHS for over a decade, and have...
IPVM Vulnerability Scanner Released on Jun 18, 2018
IPVM is proud to announce video surveillance's first and only cybersecurity vulnerability scanner. This tool allows quickly and simply...
Hikvision Corrects False Cybersecurity Announcement on Jun 18, 2018
Hikvision has corrected a false cybersecurity announcement that claimed a British government-sponsored program endorsed the cybersecurity of...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact