Free Wireless Surveillance for Cities?

Author: John Grocke, Published on Aug 14, 2013

Many IPVM end user members have reached out to us asking about a company offering wireless surveillance that sounds almost too good to be true. While most systems cost $10,000+ per camera, this company is offering it for more than 80% less, plus free infrastructure if the city can get a few businesses to buy cameras. How is this company doing that? Is it too good to be true? In this note, we examine the offerings of WildFire Connections.

WildFire's WPI Plan

*** ***** ** ***** *******, ******** ****** **** **** ***** "*** ****", ** *********** **** private ****** *******, * ******** ***** ************ ****** *** ** ******** at "********* ** **** ** *** **** ** ****** **********".  The **** ********** ** **** **** ******** ******** ******* *** purchased ** * **** ** $*,***-*,*** ****. ********'* ***** ****** that ** *** ******* ****** ********* *** ** *** *******, ***** is ** **** ** *** **** ** ******. ******** ******** *** wireless **************, ******* *** *** ******* ***** ***** ** *** network. *** * ***** **** ** * ****** ****** **** no ******, **** ** ** ******** ********. 

**** *******

**** ******** **** ********, *** ***** ***** ** *** ** that *** ***** ****** ****** ** *** ******* ************. **** confirmed **** * ******* *-****** **** ****** *** * ***** town ********* ***** ******* $**,*** *** $**,*** ***** *********. ** the ******* ****** ********* *** *******, **** ***** ***** ***** about $*,*** ** $**,*** ** ************ ***** ********, ***** ** not ******* "********* ** ****". *** **** ** ****** ***** **** to ****** **** **** ** **** ********** *******. ***** ***** not ******** ** **** ** *** **** ******* *****, ********, conditioned ***** *** ***, ******** ****** **** * ****** ** address, *** * ******** ****** ***** ******** **** ** * tall ******** ** ***** ***** *** * *** ******** *******'* main ***** *****. 

***** **** ****, ******** **** *** ********* *** ******* *****, VMS *** *** *** **** ********'* ********* *** ** ***** to *** *******. ************, ******** ******* ******** **** *** ***** police or *******'* ********** *** ****** ****** ** *** ****** ** order ** ******* *** **** ****, *** **** *********** *** be ******.    


******** ****** *** ******** **** ******* ** * **** ***** pole

System *******

*** ******** ****** ***************** ***** *** ********, ******* **** * *** **-***** ****** (included **** *** **** ****) ******** ** ****** * ******* for ** ****. **** ***** ***** *** ******* **-*****: * 2MP ******** ***** ****** *** $*,*** *** * ** ******** PTZ *** $*,***.

*** **** ****** ******** ******* *** ***** ***** ******** ** a ******* ***** *********** ***** ** * **** ******** ** a ***** ***** *********** *********** ***** ** *** ****** *********, **** **** * ****** **** of ***** **** ** *** ******* *****. *** ************* **** have **** ** ***** ** ******** ****** **** ******* ********* or ***** *********, ******** **** ****** * ******** ******* ******** using ***** ****** ** ******** ********* ** ******** ** *** well-suited *** ***** ************ *** ********** ***** *** ********.

**** *** ******* ***** ** ** ********, ******** **** *********** the ******* *** *** ********* ** ****** ** **** ** the ********* ******* *****, ** *** ******** **** *** ******** the *******. * "****** *******" *** ****** **** ** **** video ** ******* ******** **** *** **** ****. ******** ******** the ****** ** *** *** *** ******* *** ***** *** system ************* ******* ** ***** ******* ********** ******. **** ***** maintenance *****, *** *** *** ******** ** ** *********. ******** ******** a *** **** ******** ** *** *********.


******** ******* ***** ****** ******* ** * ***** *****

************

******* ** ***** ********, ******** ************ ***** ****** ************* ** local ******** ********* *** ***** * ********** **-**** *** ****** commissioning. ******** **** ******** * **-*** ******** ** ************ *****. Subcontracted ************* ****** *** *** **** ** *** ******* ****, especially **** *** ********** ** ******** ************. * **** ** county ********** * ******** ****** ***** ** **** ** ********* inspect *** ************ *** **** **** **** *** ************ *** ********* quickly ****** *** ***** ***** ******** *******.

Scale ***********

*****, ********* *** ***** *** ******* *** * **** **** surveillance ******, ******** **** ****** *****. **** '***' ** *** a ******** *** ****. *** **** *****, **** **** ********* mesh ******** ** ***** ***** ******* ***** ** ********.

******

*** ******* **** ** *** ****** ***'* "****" **** ************ and **** ** **** ******* ****** *** ******** **, *** it ***** *** ** **********. *******, ** ** ** ***** as * *-****** ******** ****** *** ** **** * ******** of *****, ********, *** *********** ******* ** ******* *******. *** ** agency **** * ******* ******, **** *** ** * ****** option *** ***** ** ***** ***** ****** ********** *** *******, *** ** ***** **** * **** ** ***** **** to * *********** ******. *** ********, **'* ** *********** ** get ***** **** ** *** **** **** * **** ** county *** ** ****-********** *** ****** ********* *** ********.

Comments (9)

Sounds like a great idea for small towns imho.

Why do I get the feeling there's a deeper "catch" to all this? I'm the last one to buy into conspiracy theories, but somehow I foresee some kind of trick "gotcha" scenario with all this... nothing SINISTER per se, but...

Ever see the movie "The Net"?

Margarita, The thing to me is that once the fine print is considered -- LoS only, Ubiquiti, installation paid separately, restrictions on adding other devices -- it's an approach that most local integrators could take for a similar price and functionality.

"Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications"

Why is this?

Because Ubiquiti is not designed to be a large scale city wide system for dozens or hundreds of cameras across a city.

Ganna have to agree on J-Hon's statement here. Ubiquiti may be alright for a couple of cams in a small residential, cost cutting project, however, in city deployments with public safety on the line, you gotta bring out the right stuff. By this I mean intelligent, wireless routers capable of the forwarding rates and bandwidth that the latest megapixel, multi-imager and PTZ cams require. You also want the ability to choose your camera make and model to suit the application. With this, you will find that each camera and VMS combination behave differently, and each combination have varying “levels” of sensitivity to latency in the network. Some combinations can tolerate moderate latency and packet retransmission while others are intolerant and will behave erratically – image artifacts, disconnections, etc. So it becomes necessary to have tight control over your wireless network, with high configurability and be able to adapt to changes in the RF environment to suit the project. Cannot stress enough the importance of proper engineering of these projects.

Bottom line, wireless deployments aren’t trivial, so align yourself with companies that understand this and can deliver results, not promises.

Side note: Starting at 00:39 in the video – I don’t see 30FPS in those images. Do you?

I'm actually going to step in on the opposite side of this argument. While I wouldn't ever run 100 cameras on Ubiquiti (I might not even run 10), I think for a small, and I mean small town (5000 people or so) who wants to run four cameras, why not Ubiquiti?

If these towns have the option of something (Ubiquiti and low cost cameras) for $200 per link plus $1600 per camera (plus install) versus nothing (because they can't afford $3000 links and cameras), why would the not take the low cost option? Especially if Wildfire is including maintenance on this gear.

The phrase "Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications" is in the context of large scale applications (see the original text). We are not objecting to Ubiquiti for a handful of cameras. The point is about end users being realistic and not thinking they can throw out dozens of Ubiquiti nodes and cover their whole city like it was no big deal.

Mike - the shots on the monitoring screens didn't look like 30fps to me either, although WildFire emphasized 30fps at least twice in the video.

Piping five 2MP cameras @ 30fps across five nanostations to a central point might create some network congestion/latency. The most I have ever done successfully with Ubiquiti is 6 but at much lower frame rate and resolution.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Backboxes for Video Surveillance Tutorial on Aug 15, 2018
Backboxes are a necessity in surveillance, whether for managing cable whips, recessing cameras, adding wireless radios. But it can be confusing to...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Aug 09, 2018
A camera's focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can cause important problems. In this guide, we explain focus issues and proper...
Camera Cable Whip Guide on Aug 03, 2018
Cable whips are one of integrator's least favorite camera features but seem to be unavoidable, now commonplace on dome, turret, and bullet cameras...
Installing Surveillance Cameras Into Synthetic Stucco (EIFS) Tutorial on Jul 30, 2018
Mounting cameras into synthetic stucco, commonly known as EIFS finishes, can be problematic If not properly planned, EIFS/stucco can be downright...
Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Ladder Lockdown and Ladder Levelizer Tested on Jul 18, 2018
Ladders are a daily necessity for surveillance and security installers, but working on an unstable surface can be extremely dangerous. In addition...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration is closed. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals.  Lots of network training...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...

Most Recent Industry Reports

2Gig Gun Lock / Motion Detector Tested on Aug 17, 2018
Safer guns for families and an opportunity for security dealers to sell more services? That is the aim of Nortek's 2GIG 'Gun Motion Detector'...
Video Analytics Integration Guide on Aug 16, 2018
Video analytics is hot again (at least conceptually) but integrating video analytics with VMSes can be challenging. This is especially significant...
Hikvision IP Camera Critical Vulnerability 2018 Disclosed on Aug 16, 2018
The same day that the US government passed a prohibition on Hikvision cameras, Hikvision disclosed a critical vulnerability for its IP...
ISS VMS / Video Analytics Company Profile on Aug 16, 2018
Who is ISS? In the past few months, they had one of the craziest ISC West promo items in years. Then, they hired industry veteran and ex-Dahua...
Chinese OEM Avycon Gets ADI Push on Aug 15, 2018
Who is Avycon? An American company? A Korean company? A couple of guys relabelling Chinese products? The latter is the best explanation. While...
Backboxes for Video Surveillance Tutorial on Aug 15, 2018
Backboxes are a necessity in surveillance, whether for managing cable whips, recessing cameras, adding wireless radios. But it can be confusing to...
Genetec Stratocast / Comcast 'Motion Insights' Examined on Aug 15, 2018
Comcast recently announced "SmartOffice Motion Insights", an extension to their Genetec OEMed cloud video service (covered by IPVM here). This...
SimpliSafe Violating California, Florida, and Texas Licensing Laws on Aug 14, 2018
IPVM has verified that DIY security system provider SimpliSafe, founded in 2006 and acquired in June of 2018 at a billion dollar valuation, is...
Ban of Dahua and Hikvision Is Now US Gov Law on Aug 13, 2018
The US President has signed the 2019 NDAA into law, banning the use of Dahua and Hikvision (and their OEMs) for the US government, for US...
Cut Milestone Licensing Costs 80% By Using Hikvision and Dahua NVRs (Tested) on Aug 13, 2018
Enterprise VMS licensing can be quite expensive, with $200 or more per channel common, meaning a 100 camera system can cost $20,000 in VMS...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact