Free Wireless Surveillance for Cities?

Author: John Grocke, Published on Aug 14, 2013

Many IPVM end user members have reached out to us asking about a company offering wireless surveillance that sounds almost too good to be true. While most systems cost $10,000+ per camera, this company is offering it for more than 80% less, plus free infrastructure if the city can get a few businesses to buy cameras. How is this company doing that? Is it too good to be true? In this note, we examine the offerings of WildFire Connections.

WildFire's WPI Plan

*** ***** ** ***** *******, ******** ****** **** **** ***** "*** ****", ** *********** **** private ****** *******, * ******** ***** ************ ****** *** ** ******** at "********* ** **** ** *** **** ** ****** **********".  The **** ********** ** **** **** ******** ******** ******* *** purchased ** * **** ** $*,***-*,*** ****. ********'* ***** ****** that ** *** ******* ****** ********* *** ** *** *******, ***** is ** **** ** *** **** ** ******. ******** ******** *** wireless **************, ******* *** *** ******* ***** ***** ** *** network. *** * ***** **** ** * ****** ****** **** no ******, **** ** ** ******** ********. 

**** *******

**** ******** **** ********, *** ***** ***** ** *** ** that *** ***** ****** ****** ** *** ******* ************. **** confirmed **** * ******* *-****** **** ****** *** * ***** town ********* ***** ******* $**,*** *** $**,*** ***** *********. ** the ******* ****** ********* *** *******, **** ***** ***** ***** about $*,*** ** $**,*** ** ************ ***** ********, ***** ** not ******* "********* ** ****". *** **** ** ****** ***** **** to ****** **** **** ** **** ********** *******. ***** ***** not ******** ** **** ** *** **** ******* *****, ********, conditioned ***** *** ***, ******** ****** **** * ****** ** address, *** * ******** ****** ***** ******** **** ** * tall ******** ** ***** ***** *** * *** ******** *******'* main ***** *****. 

***** **** ****, ******** **** *** ********* *** ******* *****, VMS *** *** *** **** ********'* ********* *** ** ***** to *** *******. ************, ******** ******* ******** **** *** ***** police or *******'* ********** *** ****** ****** ** *** ****** ** order ** ******* *** **** ****, *** **** *********** *** be ******.    


******** ****** *** ******** **** ******* ** * **** ***** pole

System *******

*** ******** ****** ***************** ***** *** ********, ******* **** * *** **-***** ****** (included **** *** **** ****) ******** ** ****** * ******* for ** ****. **** ***** ***** *** ******* **-*****: * 2MP ******** ***** ****** *** $*,*** *** * ** ******** PTZ *** $*,***.

*** **** ****** ******** ******* *** ***** ***** ******** ** a ******* ***** *********** ***** ** * **** ******** ** a ***** ***** *********** *********** ***** ** *** ****** *********, **** **** * ****** **** of ***** **** ** *** ******* *****. *** ************* **** have **** ** ***** ** ******** ****** **** ******* ********* or ***** *********, ******** **** ****** * ******** ******* ******** using ***** ****** ** ******** ********* ** ******** ** *** well-suited *** ***** ************ *** ********** ***** *** ********.

**** *** ******* ***** ** ** ********, ******** **** *********** the ******* *** *** ********* ** ****** ** **** ** the ********* ******* *****, ** *** ******** **** *** ******** the *******. * "****** *******" *** ****** **** ** **** video ** ******* ******** **** *** **** ****. ******** ******** the ****** ** *** *** *** ******* *** ***** *** system ************* ******* ** ***** ******* ********** ******. **** ***** maintenance *****, *** *** *** ******** ** ** *********. ******** ******** a *** **** ******** ** *** *********.


******** ******* ***** ****** ******* ** * ***** *****

************

******* ** ***** ********, ******** ************ ***** ****** ************* ** local ******** ********* *** ***** * ********** **-**** *** ****** commissioning. ******** **** ******** * **-*** ******** ** ************ *****. Subcontracted ************* ****** *** *** **** ** *** ******* ****, especially **** *** ********** ** ******** ************. * **** ** county ********** * ******** ****** ***** ** **** ** ********* inspect *** ************ *** **** **** **** *** ************ *** ********* quickly ****** *** ***** ***** ******** *******.

Scale ***********

*****, ********* *** ***** *** ******* *** * **** **** surveillance ******, ******** **** ****** *****. **** '***' ** *** a ******** *** ****. *** **** *****, **** **** ********* mesh ******** ** ***** ***** ******* ***** ** ********.

******

*** ******* **** ** *** ****** ***'* "****" **** ************ and **** ** **** ******* ****** *** ******** **, *** it ***** *** ** **********. *******, ** ** ** ***** as * *-****** ******** ****** *** ** **** * ******** of *****, ********, *** *********** ******* ** ******* *******. *** ** agency **** * ******* ******, **** *** ** * ****** option *** ***** ** ***** ***** ****** ********** *** *******, *** ** ***** **** * **** ** ***** **** to * *********** ******. *** ********, **'* ** *********** ** get ***** **** ** *** **** **** * **** ** county *** ** ****-********** *** ****** ********* *** ********.

Comments (9)

Sounds like a great idea for small towns imho.

Why do I get the feeling there's a deeper "catch" to all this? I'm the last one to buy into conspiracy theories, but somehow I foresee some kind of trick "gotcha" scenario with all this... nothing SINISTER per se, but...

Ever see the movie "The Net"?

Margarita, The thing to me is that once the fine print is considered -- LoS only, Ubiquiti, installation paid separately, restrictions on adding other devices -- it's an approach that most local integrators could take for a similar price and functionality.

"Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications"

Why is this?

Because Ubiquiti is not designed to be a large scale city wide system for dozens or hundreds of cameras across a city.

Ganna have to agree on J-Hon's statement here. Ubiquiti may be alright for a couple of cams in a small residential, cost cutting project, however, in city deployments with public safety on the line, you gotta bring out the right stuff. By this I mean intelligent, wireless routers capable of the forwarding rates and bandwidth that the latest megapixel, multi-imager and PTZ cams require. You also want the ability to choose your camera make and model to suit the application. With this, you will find that each camera and VMS combination behave differently, and each combination have varying “levels” of sensitivity to latency in the network. Some combinations can tolerate moderate latency and packet retransmission while others are intolerant and will behave erratically – image artifacts, disconnections, etc. So it becomes necessary to have tight control over your wireless network, with high configurability and be able to adapt to changes in the RF environment to suit the project. Cannot stress enough the importance of proper engineering of these projects.

Bottom line, wireless deployments aren’t trivial, so align yourself with companies that understand this and can deliver results, not promises.

Side note: Starting at 00:39 in the video – I don’t see 30FPS in those images. Do you?

I'm actually going to step in on the opposite side of this argument. While I wouldn't ever run 100 cameras on Ubiquiti (I might not even run 10), I think for a small, and I mean small town (5000 people or so) who wants to run four cameras, why not Ubiquiti?

If these towns have the option of something (Ubiquiti and low cost cameras) for $200 per link plus $1600 per camera (plus install) versus nothing (because they can't afford $3000 links and cameras), why would the not take the low cost option? Especially if Wildfire is including maintenance on this gear.

The phrase "Ubiquiti is not well-suited for these applications" is in the context of large scale applications (see the original text). We are not objecting to Ubiquiti for a handful of cameras. The point is about end users being realistic and not thinking they can throw out dozens of Ubiquiti nodes and cover their whole city like it was no big deal.

Mike - the shots on the monitoring screens didn't look like 30fps to me either, although WildFire emphasized 30fps at least twice in the video.

Piping five 2MP cameras @ 30fps across five nanostations to a central point might create some network congestion/latency. The most I have ever done successfully with Ubiquiti is 6 but at much lower frame rate and resolution.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Outdoor Camera Mounting Hardware Guide on Feb 21, 2019
Mounting cameras outdoors can be challenging, requiring understanding different types of equipment and methods. In this guide, we teach this...
BluB0x Company Profile on Feb 20, 2019
BluB0x has doubled in revenue every year since its founding in 2013, according to CEO Patrick Barry. We originally reported on them in 2015. At the...
Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...
Designing Access Control Guide on Jan 30, 2019
Designing an access control solution requires decisions on 8 fundamental questions. This in-depth guide helps you understand the options and...
Access Control Turnstiles Guide on Jan 28, 2019
Turnstiles control pedestrian access to secured areas, essentially becoming moving portions of fences, walls, or barricades for physically stop...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Spring 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
You can register for the Spring 2019 IP Networking course here. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
Project Documentation Forms & Work Order Tutorial on Jan 07, 2019
This form may be one of the most important tools integrators ever have doing install and service work. Inside we provide a sample template form,...
European Startup Ajax Profile - They "Stand Against Evil" on Jan 03, 2019
European intrusion detection startup Ajax Systems proclaims: How are they standing against evil? And what are the differentiators and potential...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Outdoor Camera Mounting Hardware Guide on Feb 21, 2019
Mounting cameras outdoors can be challenging, requiring understanding different types of equipment and methods. In this guide, we teach this...
HID Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 21, 2019
HID favorability results were strong, in the 2019 IPVM integrator study of 200+ integrators, with a net +62% and low negativity as the table below...
First US State, Vermont, Bans Dahua and Hikvision on Feb 21, 2019
The first US state, Vermont, has issued a ban on a number of Chinese and Russian manufacturers including the world's 2 largest video surveillance...
ADI 'SAVE BIG' On FLIR And Hikvision Examined on Feb 20, 2019
One is a major US defense supplier. The other is owned by the Chinese government. But you can "SAVE BIG" on both at ADI. In this note, we...
BluB0x Company Profile on Feb 20, 2019
BluB0x has doubled in revenue every year since its founding in 2013, according to CEO Patrick Barry. We originally reported on them in 2015. At the...
Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Sales Cuts At Rasilient on Feb 19, 2019
Over the past 2 years, video surveillance storage specialist Rasilient has expanded its workforce significantly, aiming to build its own branded...
Exacq Raises VMS Software Pricing Twice in Less Than a Year on Feb 18, 2019
Most VMSes regularly release new features, but rarely increase their prices. For the 3rd time in 4 years, and 2nd time in 8 months, since being...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact