France Declares School Facial Recognition Illegal Due to GDPR

By Charles Rollet, Published Oct 31, 2019, 07:23am EDT (Info+)

France is the latest European country to effectively prohibit facial recognition as a school access control solution, even with the consent of students, after Sweden did so in August.

The decision represents another blow to the companies marketing such solutions. In this post, we examine the news and its broader meaning, including:

  • Background
  • Solution Description
  • Feedback from Cisco, the provider of the solution
  • CNIL Response: Not GDPR Compliant
  • Sweden Comparison
  • What the GDPR Says
  • Immediate Impact
  • Privacy Activist Pledge
  • Local Response

**********

** ****, ****** ******** *********** ********* a **** ********** ****** ********** ** France's **** ********** ******, *******, ********** ******** *** * ****** recognition ****** ******* ******** ** *** high ******* (*** ** **** *** the ***** ** **********.)

Solution ***********

*** ******** *** ********* ** *****'* France ****** *** ******** ****** ****** ******** ********* ***** ******, **** *** ****** matching ******** ** *** ********* *********** on ***** *****:

**** *********** ***** ****** ***** **** project ***** ** *** ****'* ********, and **** **** ** *** ********* details:

  • ***** ***** **** ******* **** *** software *** ******** ********** *****, *** ****** *********** ******** **** here *** **** ******, ************ *******'* *++ ****** *********** *******.
  • ***** **** ****, "*** ***** ******* will ** ******* ******** ** *****" and ******** *** **** ** **** of ** "**********" ** ******* * new "************" ****** ******* ****** *** schools.
  • ***** ******* ******* *** *****, ****** would **** ***** ***** ******* ********** (red-banned, ******-*******, *****-**********) *** ** ******* by ******* ********** *** ********.
  • ******** *** ******* **** ***** ******* prior ** ***** ******* **** *** system.

CNIL ********: *** **** *********

** *******, *** ********** * ***** *********:

***** * ******** *********** ** **** project, *** **** ********* **** ** is ******** ** *** **** ********** of *************** *** **** ************ ****** in *** ****

*** ******** *** *********** ********** *** be ******** ** ******* **** *** far **** ********* ** ***** ** personal **** *** ********** *******, *** example * ***** *******

********* *********** *** ** ******** ********, ********* ********** ******** [****] **********

**** * ****** **** ****** ** legally *** ** *****

*** **** **** **** **** *** especially ******** *** ********, ********** ****** recognition ** "************ *********":

****** *********** ******* *** ************ ********* and ******* ***** ***** ** ******** data *** ********** *******, ************ **** applied ** ******

Sweden **********

*** ******* *** *** * ******* explanation ** ******,******* ****:

********** ****** *** ** **** ** other **** **** *** ******* ******* violation *** ********.

*******, ****** *** ****, *** ******* DPA **** ***** **** *** ******'* consent ***** *** ********** *** *******, as ******* ***** *** ** "****** given" (************ *** ****) *** ** *** unequal ******* ** ***** ******* ******** and ********. *** **** **** ** mention ** ******* ** *** *********.

What *** **** ****

*** **** **** *** ******* ****** recognition ********** *** ****************** ********** ** ******* ** ********. However, ******* **** *************** **** ******** **** ********** ** minimised *** ************:

********, ******** *** ******* ** **** is ********* ** ******** ** *** purposes *** ***** **** *** *********

********* *** *********, ******** *** ********** purposes *** *** ******* ********* ** a ****** **** ** ************ **** those ********

Non-Binding *** *** ********

***********, *** ****'* ******** ** ***-******* and **** *** ********** * ******* ban ** *** ****** ******* ********** facial *********** *******, ** *** ******* ********** ***** *********** *** ********* *** install ********** ******** ******* *** ***** approval. **** ***** ******'********* *********** ***** ********** *** *******.

*******, *** **** ***** *** *** authority ** ******** ******* ********** **** any ********** ********** ******* ******* ** its ********* **** ************ ******.

Privacy ******** *******

*** ****'* ******** **** *** * clear ******** ******, **** ******* ******** group ** ********** ** ************* ***** **** ******** ** ****'* attention "*** **** * ****** ** administration ******* ** ******* *** *** again".

Local ********

*** ********* ** ******'* ******** ******,****** ********, ******* "* ****** ****** **** the **** ****** *** ******** ** our ******** ***** *** ***** ********", adding **** ** ***** **** * new *********** "**** ****".

** ********** ** *** ****** *** decision** * "*******", *********** "*** ******** company *****" *** "********* **** *** law-and-order ******** ** *** ******* *********". (Cisco ****** **** **** ** *** doing **** ******* *** ****).

**********

**** ** ******* **** ** *** companies **** ******* ****** *********** *** educational ************, **** ** ****.

** ****** *********** ********** *******, **** European ********* **** ** ******* ***** own *************** ** ******* **** ********** use **** ** **** *********; ** far, *** ****** ** *****.

Comments (1)

This is good I think, i don''t think we need to be putting facial recognition on children. Let kids be kids not robots or numbers.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts reporting, tutorials and software funded by subscriber's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
Loading Related Reports