France **********
******, ****** *** **, imposes ****** *********** ** video ************. *** *******:
*** * ****** ********* scandal ******* ***** ******** are *** ******** ** paper **** ** *******.
Scandal – **** ********
********* ******** ****** ******* ***** **** ***** July**** ** *** ******** in *********** ********* *** *********, ********* Benalla, ********* **** ******-***** equipment *** **** ********** during * ******* ** Paris ** ***.
** *** ******* ****, it*********** ******* ******** ******** footage ** *** ******** filmed ** * ***** police ******** ******. *** footage *** **** ********* to ******* **** *** smartphone ***** ***** ********* sparked *** ******* ******** ** ** *** hands *****-****** *********, *** ****** it ** ***** ****** media ********. ******* ***** accounts **** **** ********* or ******* *****, ********* ******** *** ***** ** question ****** ********* ****** like *** *** ***** below:
****************** *** ************ ******* of ************ *******, ********* video ************ *******, ******* and ******** ********** ** 1 ** * ***** of **** *** ** to ***,*** ***** ** fines.
***** *** **** ********* controversy ******* *** ******** camera *******,***** ****** ***, **** ****** ********** footage *** *** ******* filming ****** ***** ** be **** *** * month, ***** ***** ** must ** ********* ****** an ****** ******** ************* is ****** *****. *******, Benalla ******** *** ******* over * ****** ***** the ******** **** ***** with ** ******** ************* occuring ** **** ****.
French ***** ********* ***** ************ ***********
** ********, ** *****, France’s ******* *********,***** ** ******* ************* *** ******* “**** light ** *** *********** of ************ ********** ***** surveillance.” (** *** ****************** *** ******** ****** how “***** ************ ******** the ******** *** ****** than ******** ********.”)
** ***** ******** ****:
- “****** **********” *** ***** surveillance *** ** ** major ****** ****** *** effectively ***** *** ***** of ****** *** **** no ******** ******.
- *** *********** **** *** punish ********* ** ******’* data ********** ******, *******. *******, ** ** overwhelmed ** ** **** regulates *** ***** ******* matters *** *** * relatively ***** ****** ** 17 ******* *****.
- *** ******** ******** *** up ** *********-******** “******** Video ************ **********” ** 2012 *** ** *** been ********** ******** *****. Its ***************** ********-*********.
IPVM ********
****** ***** ************ *** expert**** ********, * *********** ** the ********** ** *********, told **** **** *** French **********’* *********** ** video ************ *********** ** lacking.
******** ********* **** *** detailed ************ ******** ** authorities ** ******* ***** surveillance ******* *** **** like “************” ***** **** 2-3% *** **** ********. Furthermore, **** ** **** are ******* ** **-**** visits ** *** ********.
“[*** ***********’] **** **** is ** ****** ************, there *** **** *** rejections,” ******** ****.
******** **** ********** ** is **** ******’* **** protection *********, *** ****, which *** ******* *********** powers. *** **** ********* are ****** **** *** even **** **** ***, it ** **** ********** ****** *** **** installed *** ******* ***** some **** ** ***** scandal.
*** **** ****** *************** ** **** ** “controls” ** **** ********** the ***** ********** ** video ************ *********.******** ************* ******** ** ******’* ******** records; ***** ***, *** CNIL *** ****** **** technical *************** ** **** the ***** ******* ******** sanctions.
CNIL ********
*** **** **** **** that ***** ******* ** its ******* ************* ******** show “**** ** *** doing *** **** *********** the ***** ** *** disposal.”
“*** **** **** ** place ********** ** ********** its ******* *** *** dedicated * ******* ** its ********** ** ********* video ************ *******”, * spokesperson **** ** *****.
*** **** ***** **** it *** ******* *** Paris ***********’ ***** ************ system ***** ** *** Benalla ********, *** ******* by ******* “*********” ******* ** ************** and **** ** *** investigating *** ************* ** the ******* ******** ** Benalla ** ****.
GDPR ************
*** **** ** ************* enforcement ** ***** ************ regulations ** ****** ***** the **** ** ** integrators *** *** *****, not ***********, ** **** sure ******* *** *********. As ********* ** ********* Heilman, **** *********** ******* well ***** ************ ***** place.
**** ** ********** ********* due ** *** ****. The ***, ***** **** effect ** *** **,******* **** ******* ********* – ** to *% ** ********* revenues ** ** ******* euros.
** ***** ** ****’***** *****, **** ** *** law’s *********** ***** ******** to ***** ************ – for *******, * *** on **** ******* ********** use **** ****** *********** and ****** *********** *** notifying ***********, *********, ** end ***** ** **** of * ****.
*** **** ** ******* capable ** ******** **** fines ** *** ********* and **** ** ** IPVM. ** **** **** it *** ******* ** making **** ********* ***** public ** * ****-**-**** basis *** *** **** so ******, *** ******* in *** **** ** a ******* ******* ***** was [**** ** ****** available]***** *,*** ***** [**** no ****** *********]*** ********* ************ ********** [link ** ****** *********] after * ********* **** an ******** **** * camera *** ********* ** permanently ******* ***** *********.
Integrators ******
** ******** ** ***** surveillance *********** *** ** the **** *** ************ sophisticated ***** ********* **********, integrators ****** ** ******* to ****** **** ****, even ** **** **** been ******-******** ***** ***.
** ** **** **** video ************ ** *** the ******* ****** ** GDPR, ***** *** ******* mostly ** ******** ** large **** ********* **** Google *** ********. *******, ** ****** ** a *******, ***** ** no ***** **** *** penalties *** ** ******.
************, *** **** ** also ******** ********* ***** surveillance – *** *******,******* *** **** ********* *** ** ********** technology *** ******* ********* due ** *** ****.
******** *********** ****** ** aware ** *** ***** developments *** **** *********** if *********.
Comments (1)
Undisclosed Manufacturer #1
"Private homeowners are exempt from most regulations but still cannot install cameras that film public areas like streets (this even applies to outdoor garage cameras.)"
This is just so crazy. The nanny state mindset that generates policies such as this is terrifying.
Create New Topic