Camera Labor Estimate: Low Tile / Grid Ceiling

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Nov 13, 2014

IPVM is launching the first surveillance labor estimate standard.

This is the first entry in that series.

Here, we report on a common scenario "Mounting a Camera in a Low Tile/Grid Ceiling." The actual survey question asked is:

"The location has 1/2" thick fiber acoustic tile suspended from grid, with no existing backing material or needed plenum rating, located 8' - 10' above the floor.  Cabling has previously been run and terminated to the mounting spot. How many manhours would you estimate for mounting a camera in the following area?  Why?"

We purposely reduced the question scope to only mounting the camera, and disclaimed tasks like running cable, configuring cameras, and adjusting VMS as separate tasks addressed by followup questions.

Below, we share estimates, key issues and drivers for installing in this scenario.

**** ** ********* *** first ************ ***** ******** standard.

**** ** *** ***** entry ** **** ******.

****, ** ****** ** a ****** ******** "******** a ****** ** * Low ****/**** *******." *** ****** survey ******** ***** **:

"*** ******** *** */*" ***** fiber ******** **** ********* from ****, **** ** ******** backing ******** ** ****** plenum ******, ******* *' - **' ***** *** floor.  ******* *** ********** been *** *** ********** to *** ******** ****. How ************ ***** *** ******** *** mounting * ****** ** the ********* ****?  ***?"

** ********* ******* *** question ***** ** **** mounting *** ******, *** disclaimed ***** **** ******* cable, *********** *******, *** adjusting *** ** ******** tasks ********* ** ******** questions.

*****, ** ***** *********, *** issues *** ******* *** installing ** **** ********.

[***************]

*******

**** **% ** *** responses **** ******* *.* to *.*********. *** **** ****** is ***** *****:

*** ******* ** *** answers ** *.** ******** *** **** ********.

Color **********

*** ******** ** ********* fell ****** *.** ** each *****, *** ******* suggest **** **** ********** estimate *** **** ** one********* ****:

  • "* ** *.* *** hours, **** ******* **** little ****"
  • "* **** *** ****** mounting. ****** **** **** a **** ******."
  • "* **** ***. ** experienced ********* ****** ** 0.5 ** *.**. **** yourself ** *.**/** ******."
  • "*** *** **** ** sufficient. **** ** * ground ***** ******* ******* a ****** * ** ladder ** * ********** environment **** ** **** for **** *******.."
  • "* ***** *** **** ** 1 *** ****. ******** the ****** ***** *** be *** **** **** consuming ****, *** ***** need ** ***** **** to ******* ***** *** never **** *** *** it ** ***** *** these ********."

**** **** ********* ********* more ***** *****, ** was ********* *** ** including ********** ***** **** cable *********** ** ****** focusing **** **** ******* the ******** *****.  ***** results **** *** ******** in *** ************ *****.

**** *************: ******* **** Variable

*** ****** ** *** install *** ********* ** the ******** *** ******* or *** *** **** needed ** ** ********** first. ** ************ *** not ******* **** ******, as ** ***** ******* the ******* ** * specific ******** ******** (**: Not ********** *** ** grid ******, ** *********). In **** *****, ** installers ********* **** *************, ***** estimates **** ******. 

  • "***** ** ***.  * have ** ******* * backbox ****** *** ******, cut *** ****, ******* and ****** *** ****** and **** ***** **."
  • "* ***** ******** *** camera ******* ** **** 1.5 *****. **** ** due ** ******* * mounting ******* ** ** installed ****** *-***** *** ******** mounting."
  • "*** **** ***** * hour *** ** *** to ***** *** ****** since *** **** ** drill *** ***** *** cables *** ** **** to ******* *** **** of *** ****** ** be **** ** *** ceiling."
  • "*.* **** ** *****. This ** ******** *** mounting ** * **** that *** **** ***-********** with *** ******* ** address. ********** **** ****** tile, **** ***** ****, mount ****** ***** * wooden ****-*****."
  • "* **** *******, ********* on *** ****** *****. We **** ********* ******* a "***** ***" ******* that ***** *** ****, and **** ******** *** weight ** *** ******, which ** ******* ******* the ****."

******** *****

******* *********** ***** **** would *** ******** ***** a ******* *****, **** if *** **** ********** took **** ****:

  • " ** **** ****** ** increments ** **** *****. We'd ******** *.*/**.  ** the ******* ** ***** right ** *** **** this ****** ** ** install *** **** *** do ****** * **** hour ** **** ** there ** ******* ***** the **** ******** *** path."
  • "** ** **** ** do ******** ** **** than * ****. **'* estimate **** *** **** (example ******)."
  • "* ***** ******* **'* our ******* ******."
  • "** ***** ******** ******** under * *******, **** one ***** ******** ** 2."

*** ******** **** ** distintion ******* *** ******** being *** * *****/******* call, ** ** **** of * ****** *******. However, **** ********* ***** impact *** **** **** is ********* ****** ** the ********* ** ****** tools, ******* **, ** otherwise '****** * *** worthwhile'.

******* ******

******* ********* **** ******* estimated **** **** ** whether *** *** ** hanging * ****** ******, or ** ** ** one ** *******. ** every ****, *** '****** camera' ******** *** ****** than ** ** **** just *** ** * group:

  • "******** * **** - depends ** *** ****** of ******* ***** ****** like **** *******."
  • "*** (*) ****** ****, 3 *****. (******** ** site, ******* "********", ***.) If ***, (*) ******* on **** ******* ** hallways ***** **, * would *** * **** orientation *** **** * hour **** ******."
  • "** **** *** * single ****** ************, ***'** getting ****** *** * hours. *******, ** **** was * ******** ****** install, ***'* *** ** total ******* *** **** one. "
  • "* **** ** ** just * ****** ****** installation, ** **** **** 1 ****** *** ***** to ** ********* ** 0.45 *****/ ******."

*** ****** ****, *** estimate *** ****** *** fall ********* ** ********* of *****.

********?

** *** ********** * series ** ******* **** this *** *** ******. Do *** **** ********* or ******** ** ***** as ** ******* *******? We ***** ********** **** thoughts.  ****** ******* *****.

Comments (3)

I don't think you were asking about billable times, travel times, setup time, cleanup time, or anything else except mounting the camera. Is that correct? If I were standing in that room you picture with a ladder, 4 lightweight dome cameras, and the mounting hardware ready to go I could install them in 1 hour no problem. I'm not counting walking to truck, clean up, or anything else just install. If you take into account setup, clean up, trips to the truck, lunch etc., then you want to bill for an hour/camera to make a profit even though realistically any half way competent installer worth his weight should be able to 15+ in a single day.

I think this is something that is challenging for them to compile simply because of the way each person/company may handle estimation standards. Also, there is varying level of qualities from different technicians/company which impacts time frames.

For example: I worked at a company where our estimate was replicated at 2000 sites. Missing something that costs $10 would cause damages of $20k. The inverse was also true and could price us out of a project. We accounted for items as small as nuts and bolts in our estimates. Conversely, many conventional integrators I have worked within figure x hours per unit, throw some miscellaneous cost at it, and hope it all balances out in the end or beg for change orders.

Basically, each person will find loopholes in the methodology used to acquire and present the data. I think this is valiant effort and much like the NECA Estimation Guide it's to be used as a baseline, not a hard rule. NECA has had difficulty compiling their estimation book in a usable fashion for years, and it's still marginally useful. Unlike the NECA guides these IPVM time frames are actually applicable to our industry and not something like installing a distribution panel.

It does seem that some are answering in billable time estimates and yet others using stopwatch time estimates.

This is indicated in general by this statement

Several integrators noted they would not estimate under a certain limit, even if the task ultimately took less time.

and in particular by things like

2 hours because it's our minimum charge.

If this was a single camera installation, you're getting billed for 4 hours. However, if this was a multiple camera install, you'd get 30 total minutes for this one.

We never estimate mounting under 1 manhour, this one would probably be 2.

This may be the cause of the valley in the sample, the .5s being more realtime estimates and the 1.0s being more minimum charges.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Axis Will Not Block Resellers on Jun 10, 2019
While Axis generally has strong favorability amongst integrators, the biggest complaint is their channel model, which results in smaller integrator...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
Startup Rhombus Systems Says Twice the Features, Half the Price of Verkada on Jun 04, 2019
Closed cloud systems may be the fastest growing segment of video surveillance with Meraki and Verkada. Now another California company is joining...
China / US Trade War Impact Splits Industry on Jun 04, 2019
As the trade war continues to heat up, 170+ integrators told us "What impact will the US / PRC China conflict have on the industry?" Respondents...
Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 03, 2019
Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate. In...

Most Recent Industry Reports

HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Beware African 50,000 IP Camera Contract Scam on Jul 12, 2019
A “Nigerian Prince” scam for the video surveillance market is going around. You, or at least we, could be lucky enough to be the single bidder for...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact