Camera Labor Estimate: Low Tile / Grid Ceiling

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Nov 13, 2014

IPVM is launching the first surveillance labor estimate standard.

This is the first entry in that series.

Here, we report on a common scenario "Mounting a Camera in a Low Tile/Grid Ceiling." The actual survey question asked is:

"The location has 1/2" thick fiber acoustic tile suspended from grid, with no existing backing material or needed plenum rating, located 8' - 10' above the floor.  Cabling has previously been run and terminated to the mounting spot. How many manhours would you estimate for mounting a camera in the following area?  Why?"

We purposely reduced the question scope to only mounting the camera, and disclaimed tasks like running cable, configuring cameras, and adjusting VMS as separate tasks addressed by followup questions.

Below, we share estimates, key issues and drivers for installing in this scenario.

**** ** ********* *** first ************ ***** ******** standard.

**** ** *** ***** entry ** **** ******.

****, ** ****** ** a ****** ******** "******** a ****** ** * Low ****/**** *******." *** ****** survey ******** ***** **:

"*** ******** *** */*" ***** fiber ******** **** ********* from ****, **** ** ******** backing ******** ** ****** plenum ******, ******* *' - **' ***** *** floor.  ******* *** ********** been *** *** ********** to *** ******** ****. How ************ ***** *** ******** *** mounting * ****** ** the ********* ****?  ***?"

** ********* ******* *** question ***** ** **** mounting *** ******, *** disclaimed ***** **** ******* cable, *********** *******, *** adjusting *** ** ******** tasks ********* ** ******** questions.

*****, ** ***** *********, *** issues *** ******* *** installing ** **** ********.

[***************]

*******

**** **% ** *** responses **** ******* *.* to *.*********. *** **** ****** is ***** *****:

*** ******* ** *** answers ** *.** ******** *** **** ********.

Color **********

*** ******** ** ********* fell ****** *.** ** each *****, *** ******* suggest **** **** ********** estimate *** **** ** one********* ****:

  • "* ** *.* *** hours, **** ******* **** little ****"
  • "* **** *** ****** mounting. ****** **** **** a **** ******."
  • "* **** ***. ** experienced ********* ****** ** 0.5 ** *.**. **** yourself ** *.**/** ******."
  • "*** *** **** ** sufficient. **** ** * ground ***** ******* ******* a ****** * ** ladder ** * ********** environment **** ** **** for **** *******.."
  • "* ***** *** **** ** 1 *** ****. ******** the ****** ***** *** be *** **** **** consuming ****, *** ***** need ** ***** **** to ******* ***** *** never **** *** *** it ** ***** *** these ********."

**** **** ********* ********* more ***** *****, ** was ********* *** ** including ********** ***** **** cable *********** ** ****** focusing **** **** ******* the ******** *****.  ***** results **** *** ******** in *** ************ *****.

**** *************: ******* **** Variable

*** ****** ** *** install *** ********* ** the ******** *** ******* or *** *** **** needed ** ** ********** first. ** ************ *** not ******* **** ******, as ** ***** ******* the ******* ** * specific ******** ******** (**: Not ********** *** ** grid ******, ** *********). In **** *****, ** installers ********* **** *************, ***** estimates **** ******. 

  • "***** ** ***.  * have ** ******* * backbox ****** *** ******, cut *** ****, ******* and ****** *** ****** and **** ***** **."
  • "* ***** ******** *** camera ******* ** **** 1.5 *****. **** ** due ** ******* * mounting ******* ** ** installed ****** *-***** *** ******** mounting."
  • "*** **** ***** * hour *** ** *** to ***** *** ****** since *** **** ** drill *** ***** *** cables *** ** **** to ******* *** **** of *** ****** ** be **** ** *** ceiling."
  • "*.* **** ** *****. This ** ******** *** mounting ** * **** that *** **** ***-********** with *** ******* ** address. ********** **** ****** tile, **** ***** ****, mount ****** ***** * wooden ****-*****."
  • "* **** *******, ********* on *** ****** *****. We **** ********* ******* a "***** ***" ******* that ***** *** ****, and **** ******** *** weight ** *** ******, which ** ******* ******* the ****."

******** *****

******* *********** ***** **** would *** ******** ***** a ******* *****, **** if *** **** ********** took **** ****:

  • " ** **** ****** ** increments ** **** *****. We'd ******** *.*/**.  ** the ******* ** ***** right ** *** **** this ****** ** ** install *** **** *** do ****** * **** hour ** **** ** there ** ******* ***** the **** ******** *** path."
  • "** ** **** ** do ******** ** **** than * ****. **'* estimate **** *** **** (example ******)."
  • "* ***** ******* **'* our ******* ******."
  • "** ***** ******** ******** under * *******, **** one ***** ******** ** 2."

*** ******** **** ** distintion ******* *** ******** being *** * *****/******* call, ** ** **** of * ****** *******. However, **** ********* ***** impact *** **** **** is ********* ****** ** the ********* ** ****** tools, ******* **, ** otherwise '****** * *** worthwhile'.

******* ******

******* ********* **** ******* estimated **** **** ** whether *** *** ** hanging * ****** ******, or ** ** ** one ** *******. ** every ****, *** '****** camera' ******** *** ****** than ** ** **** just *** ** * group:

  • "******** * **** - depends ** *** ****** of ******* ***** ****** like **** *******."
  • "*** (*) ****** ****, 3 *****. (******** ** site, ******* "********", ***.) If ***, (*) ******* on **** ******* ** hallways ***** **, * would *** * **** orientation *** **** * hour **** ******."
  • "** **** *** * single ****** ************, ***'** getting ****** *** * hours. *******, ** **** was * ******** ****** install, ***'* *** ** total ******* *** **** one. "
  • "* **** ** ** just * ****** ****** installation, ** **** **** 1 ****** *** ***** to ** ********* ** 0.45 *****/ ******."

*** ****** ****, *** estimate *** ****** *** fall ********* ** ********* of *****.

********?

** *** ********** * series ** ******* **** this *** *** ******. Do *** **** ********* or ******** ** ***** as ** ******* *******? We ***** ********** **** thoughts.  ****** ******* *****.

Comments (3)

Undisclosed Integrator #1

11/14/14 07:15pm

I don't think you were asking about billable times, travel times, setup time, cleanup time, or anything else except mounting the camera. Is that correct? If I were standing in that room you picture with a ladder, 4 lightweight dome cameras, and the mounting hardware ready to go I could install them in 1 hour no problem. I'm not counting walking to truck, clean up, or anything else just install. If you take into account setup, clean up, trips to the truck, lunch etc., then you want to bill for an hour/camera to make a profit even though realistically any half way competent installer worth his weight should be able to 15+ in a single day.

Undisclosed Integrator #2

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 11/14/14 07:26pm

I think this is something that is challenging for them to compile simply because of the way each person/company may handle estimation standards. Also, there is varying level of qualities from different technicians/company which impacts time frames.

For example: I worked at a company where our estimate was replicated at 2000 sites. Missing something that costs $10 would cause damages of $20k. The inverse was also true and could price us out of a project. We accounted for items as small as nuts and bolts in our estimates. Conversely, many conventional integrators I have worked within figure x hours per unit, throw some miscellaneous cost at it, and hope it all balances out in the end or beg for change orders.

Basically, each person will find loopholes in the methodology used to acquire and present the data. I think this is valiant effort and much like the NECA Estimation Guide it's to be used as a baseline, not a hard rule. NECA has had difficulty compiling their estimation book in a usable fashion for years, and it's still marginally useful. Unlike the NECA guides these IPVM time frames are actually applicable to our industry and not something like installing a distribution panel.

Roger Paine

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 12/04/14 07:40pm

It does seem that some are answering in billable time estimates and yet others using stopwatch time estimates.

This is indicated in general by this statement

Several integrators noted they would not estimate under a certain limit, even if the task ultimately took less time.

and in particular by things like

2 hours because it's our minimum charge.

If this was a single camera installation, you're getting billed for 4 hours. However, if this was a multiple camera install, you'd get 30 total minutes for this one.

We never estimate mounting under 1 manhour, this one would probably be 2.

This may be the cause of the valley in the sample, the .5s being more realtime estimates and the 1.0s being more minimum charges.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
Ranking Manufacturer Favorability 2019 on May 06, 2019
24 manufacturer's favorability was ranked based on 170+ integrators feedback. Voting plus in-depth comments revealed insights on which brands were...
Registration Closed - Spring 2019 IP Networking Course on May 02, 2019
Register now for the Spring 2019 IP Networking course here - Closed. Last chance now.   This is the only networking course designed specifically...
LenelS2 Launches VRx Video Platform on Apr 29, 2019
For years, S2's video management platform, the NetVR, was based on Exacq. Now, after years of internal development, S2 has launched its own...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...
Amazon Ring Public Subsidy Program Aims To Dominate Residential Security on May 20, 2019
Amazon dominates market after market. Quitely, but increasingly, they are doing so in residential security, through a combination of significant...
LifeSafety Power NetLink Vulnerabilities And Problematic Response on May 20, 2019
'Power supplies' are not devices that many think about when considering vulnerabilities but as more and more devices go 'online', the risks for...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact