Camera Labor Estimate: Low Tile / Grid Ceiling

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Nov 13, 2014

IPVM is launching the first surveillance labor estimate standard.

This is the first entry in that series.

Here, we report on a common scenario "Mounting a Camera in a Low Tile/Grid Ceiling." The actual survey question asked is:

"The location has 1/2" thick fiber acoustic tile suspended from grid, with no existing backing material or needed plenum rating, located 8' - 10' above the floor.  Cabling has previously been run and terminated to the mounting spot. How many manhours would you estimate for mounting a camera in the following area?  Why?"

We purposely reduced the question scope to only mounting the camera, and disclaimed tasks like running cable, configuring cameras, and adjusting VMS as separate tasks addressed by followup questions.

Below, we share estimates, key issues and drivers for installing in this scenario.

**** ** ********* *** ***** ************ ***** ******** ********.

**** ** *** ***** ***** ** **** ******.

****, ** ****** ** * ****** ******** "******** * ****** in * *** ****/**** *******." *** ****** ****** ******** ***** **:

"*** ******** *** */*" ***** ***** ******** **** ********* **** ****, **** ** ******** ******* ******** ** ****** ****** ******, located *' - **' ***** *** *****.  ******* *** ********** been *** *** ********** ** *** ******** ****. *** ************ ***** *** ******** *** ******** * ****** ** *** ********* area?  ***?"

** ********* ******* *** ******** ***** ** **** ******** *** camera, *** ********** ***** **** ******* *****, *********** *******, *** adjusting *** ** ******** ***** ********* ** ******** *********.

*****, ** ***** *********, *** ****** *** ******* *** ********** ** this ********.

[***************]

*******

**** **% ** *** ********* **** ******* *.* ** *.*********. *** **** ****** ** ***** *****:

*** ******* ** *** ******* ** *.** ******** *** **** ********.

Color **********

*** ******** ** ********* **** ****** *.** ** **** *****, and ******* ******* **** **** ********** ******** *** **** ** one********* ****:

  • "* ** *.* *** *****, **** ******* **** ****** ****"
  • "* **** *** ****** ********. ****** **** **** * **** ladder."
  • "* **** ***. ** *********** ********* ****** ** *.* ** 0.75. **** ******** ** *.**/** ******."
  • "*** *** **** ** **********. **** ** * ****** ***** install ******* * ****** * ** ****** ** * ********** environment **** ** **** *** **** *******.."
  • "* ***** *** **** ** * *** ****. ******** *** ****** would *** ** *** **** **** ********* ****, *** ***** need ** ***** **** ** ******* ***** *** ***** **** how *** ** ** ***** *** ***** ********."

**** **** ********* ********* **** ***** *****, ** *** ********* due ** ********* ********** ***** **** ***** *********** ** ****** focusing **** **** ******* *** ******** *****.  ***** ******* **** not ******** ** *** ************ *****.

**** *************: ******* **** ********

*** ****** ** *** ******* *** ********* ** *** ******** was ******* ** *** *** **** ****** ** ** ********** first. ** ************ *** *** ******* **** ******, ** ** avoid ******* *** ******* ** * ******** ******** ******** (**: Not ********** *** ** **** ******, ** *********). ** **** cases, ** ********** ********* **** *************, ***** ********* **** ******. 

  • "***** ** ***.  * **** ** ******* * ******* ****** the ******, *** *** ****, ******* *** ****** *** ****** and **** ***** **."
  • "* ***** ******** *** ****** ******* ** **** *.* *****. This ** *** ** ******* * ******** ******* ** ** installed ****** *-***** *** ******** ********."
  • "*** **** ***** * **** *** ** *** ** ***** the ****** ***** *** **** ** ***** *** ***** *** cables *** ** **** ** ******* *** **** ** *** camera ** ** **** ** *** *******."
  • "*.* **** ** *****. **** ** ******** *** ******** ** a **** **** *** **** ***-********** **** *** ******* ** address. ********** **** ****** ****, **** ***** ****, ***** ****** using * ****** ****-*****."
  • "* **** *******, ********* ** *** ****** *****. ** **** typically ******* * "***** ***" ******* **** ***** *** ****, and **** ******** *** ****** ** *** ******, ***** ** mounted ******* *** ****."

******** *****

******* *********** ***** **** ***** *** ******** ***** * ******* limit, **** ** *** **** ********** **** **** ****:

  • " ** **** ****** ** ********** ** **** *****. **'* ******** 0.5/hr.  ** *** ******* ** ***** ***** ** *** **** this ****** ** ** ******* *** **** *** ** ****** a **** **** ** **** ** ***** ** ******* ***** the **** ******** *** ****."
  • "** ** **** ** ** ******** ** **** **** * hour. **'* ******** **** *** **** (******* ******)."
  • "* ***** ******* **'* *** ******* ******."
  • "** ***** ******** ******** ***** * *******, **** *** ***** probably ** *."

*** ******** **** ** ********** ******* *** ******** ***** *** a *****/******* ****, ** ** **** ** * ****** *******. However, **** ********* ***** ****** *** **** **** ** ********* purely ** *** ********* ** ****** *****, ******* **, ** otherwise '****** * *** **********'.

******* ******

******* ********* **** ******* ********* **** **** ** ******* *** job ** ******* * ****** ******, ** ** ** ** one ** *******. ** ***** ****, *** '****** ******' ******** was ****** **** ** ** **** **** *** ** * group:

  • "******** * **** - ******* ** *** ****** ** ******* being ****** **** **** *******."
  • "*** (*) ****** ****, * *****. (******** ** ****, ******* "oriented", ***.) ** ***, (*) ******* ** **** ******* ** hallways ***** **, * ***** *** * **** *********** *** then * **** **** ******."
  • "** **** *** * ****** ****** ************, ***'** ******* ****** for * *****. *******, ** **** *** * ******** ****** install, ***'* *** ** ***** ******* *** **** ***. "
  • "* **** ** ** **** * ****** ****** ************, ** more **** * ****** *** ***** ** ** ********* ** 0.45 *****/ ******."

*** ****** ****, *** ******** *** ****** *** **** ********* to ********* ** *****.

********?

** *** ********** * ****** ** ******* **** **** *** our ******. ** *** **** ********* ** ******** ** ***** as ** ******* *******? ** ***** ********** **** ********.  ****** comment *****.

Comments (3)

Undisclosed Integrator #1

11/14/14 07:15pm

I don't think you were asking about billable times, travel times, setup time, cleanup time, or anything else except mounting the camera. Is that correct? If I were standing in that room you picture with a ladder, 4 lightweight dome cameras, and the mounting hardware ready to go I could install them in 1 hour no problem. I'm not counting walking to truck, clean up, or anything else just install. If you take into account setup, clean up, trips to the truck, lunch etc., then you want to bill for an hour/camera to make a profit even though realistically any half way competent installer worth his weight should be able to 15+ in a single day.

Undisclosed Integrator #2

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 11/14/14 07:26pm

I think this is something that is challenging for them to compile simply because of the way each person/company may handle estimation standards. Also, there is varying level of qualities from different technicians/company which impacts time frames.

For example: I worked at a company where our estimate was replicated at 2000 sites. Missing something that costs $10 would cause damages of $20k. The inverse was also true and could price us out of a project. We accounted for items as small as nuts and bolts in our estimates. Conversely, many conventional integrators I have worked within figure x hours per unit, throw some miscellaneous cost at it, and hope it all balances out in the end or beg for change orders.

Basically, each person will find loopholes in the methodology used to acquire and present the data. I think this is valiant effort and much like the NECA Estimation Guide it's to be used as a baseline, not a hard rule. NECA has had difficulty compiling their estimation book in a usable fashion for years, and it's still marginally useful. Unlike the NECA guides these IPVM time frames are actually applicable to our industry and not something like installing a distribution panel.

Roger Paine

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 12/04/14 07:40pm

It does seem that some are answering in billable time estimates and yet others using stopwatch time estimates.

This is indicated in general by this statement

Several integrators noted they would not estimate under a certain limit, even if the task ultimately took less time.

and in particular by things like

2 hours because it's our minimum charge.

If this was a single camera installation, you're getting billed for 4 hours. However, if this was a multiple camera install, you'd get 30 total minutes for this one.

We never estimate mounting under 1 manhour, this one would probably be 2.

This may be the cause of the valley in the sample, the .5s being more realtime estimates and the 1.0s being more minimum charges.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Eagle Eye Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 21, 2019
Eagle Eye has been the biggest spender in the cloud VMS market including (via their owner) acquiring Brivo for $50 million and CameraManager from...
Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...
Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Insurance Startup Coalition Profile on Mar 20, 2019
Many industry people believe cybersecurity insurance is not worth it, as the voting and debate in our Cybersecurity Insurance For Security...
Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Top Metrics For Ensuring Integrator Profitability - Statistics on Mar 20, 2019
How do integrators ensure the profitability of their projects? As part of our profitability study, 100+ integrators answered the following...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...
Installation Course - Last Chance on Mar 14, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the March Installation course. This is a unique installation course in a market where little practical...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Eagle Eye Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 21, 2019
Eagle Eye has been the biggest spender in the cloud VMS market including (via their owner) acquiring Brivo for $50 million and CameraManager from...
Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...
Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Insurance Startup Coalition Profile on Mar 20, 2019
Many industry people believe cybersecurity insurance is not worth it, as the voting and debate in our Cybersecurity Insurance For Security...
Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Top Metrics For Ensuring Integrator Profitability - Statistics on Mar 20, 2019
How do integrators ensure the profitability of their projects? As part of our profitability study, 100+ integrators answered the following...
Avigilon Launches 'Renewed Products Program' on Mar 19, 2019
There are lots of 'pre-owned' cars but pre-owned IP cameras? While such programs are common in other industries, in video surveillance, they are...
Hanwha Tax Evasion Probe, Camera Division Implicated on Mar 19, 2019
A Hanwha group subsidiary was raided as part of a tax evasion probe. While a Korean news media report listed the raided entity as 'Hanwha...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact