Camera Labor Estimate: Low Tile / Grid Ceiling

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Nov 13, 2014

IPVM is launching the first surveillance labor estimate standard.

This is the first entry in that series.

Here, we report on a common scenario "Mounting a Camera in a Low Tile/Grid Ceiling." The actual survey question asked is:

"The location has 1/2" thick fiber acoustic tile suspended from grid, with no existing backing material or needed plenum rating, located 8' - 10' above the floor.  Cabling has previously been run and terminated to the mounting spot. How many manhours would you estimate for mounting a camera in the following area?  Why?"

We purposely reduced the question scope to only mounting the camera, and disclaimed tasks like running cable, configuring cameras, and adjusting VMS as separate tasks addressed by followup questions.

Below, we share estimates, key issues and drivers for installing in this scenario.

**** ** ********* *** first ************ ***** ******** standard.

**** ** *** ***** entry ** **** ******.

****, ** ****** ** a ****** ******** "******** a ****** ** * Low ****/**** *******." *** ****** survey ******** ***** **:

"*** ******** *** */*" ***** fiber ******** **** ********* from ****, **** ** ******** backing ******** ** ****** plenum ******, ******* *' - **' ***** *** floor.  ******* *** ********** been *** *** ********** to *** ******** ****. How ************ ***** *** ******** *** mounting * ****** ** the ********* ****?  ***?"

** ********* ******* *** question ***** ** **** mounting *** ******, *** disclaimed ***** **** ******* cable, *********** *******, *** adjusting *** ** ******** tasks ********* ** ******** questions.

*****, ** ***** *********, *** issues *** ******* *** installing ** **** ********.

[***************]

*******

**** **% ** *** responses **** ******* *.* to *.*********. *** **** ****** is ***** *****:

*** ******* ** *** answers ** *.** ******** *** **** ********.

Color **********

*** ******** ** ********* fell ****** *.** ** each *****, *** ******* suggest **** **** ********** estimate *** **** ** one********* ****:

  • "* ** *.* *** hours, **** ******* **** little ****"
  • "* **** *** ****** mounting. ****** **** **** a **** ******."
  • "* **** ***. ** experienced ********* ****** ** 0.5 ** *.**. **** yourself ** *.**/** ******."
  • "*** *** **** ** sufficient. **** ** * ground ***** ******* ******* a ****** * ** ladder ** * ********** environment **** ** **** for **** *******.."
  • "* ***** *** **** ** 1 *** ****. ******** the ****** ***** *** be *** **** **** consuming ****, *** ***** need ** ***** **** to ******* ***** *** never **** *** *** it ** ***** *** these ********."

**** **** ********* ********* more ***** *****, ** was ********* *** ** including ********** ***** **** cable *********** ** ****** focusing **** **** ******* the ******** *****.  ***** results **** *** ******** in *** ************ *****.

**** *************: ******* **** Variable

*** ****** ** *** install *** ********* ** the ******** *** ******* or *** *** **** needed ** ** ********** first. ** ************ *** not ******* **** ******, as ** ***** ******* the ******* ** * specific ******** ******** (**: Not ********** *** ** grid ******, ** *********). In **** *****, ** installers ********* **** *************, ***** estimates **** ******. 

  • "***** ** ***.  * have ** ******* * backbox ****** *** ******, cut *** ****, ******* and ****** *** ****** and **** ***** **."
  • "* ***** ******** *** camera ******* ** **** 1.5 *****. **** ** due ** ******* * mounting ******* ** ** installed ****** *-***** *** ******** mounting."
  • "*** **** ***** * hour *** ** *** to ***** *** ****** since *** **** ** drill *** ***** *** cables *** ** **** to ******* *** **** of *** ****** ** be **** ** *** ceiling."
  • "*.* **** ** *****. This ** ******** *** mounting ** * **** that *** **** ***-********** with *** ******* ** address. ********** **** ****** tile, **** ***** ****, mount ****** ***** * wooden ****-*****."
  • "* **** *******, ********* on *** ****** *****. We **** ********* ******* a "***** ***" ******* that ***** *** ****, and **** ******** *** weight ** *** ******, which ** ******* ******* the ****."

******** *****

******* *********** ***** **** would *** ******** ***** a ******* *****, **** if *** **** ********** took **** ****:

  • " ** **** ****** ** increments ** **** *****. We'd ******** *.*/**.  ** the ******* ** ***** right ** *** **** this ****** ** ** install *** **** *** do ****** * **** hour ** **** ** there ** ******* ***** the **** ******** *** path."
  • "** ** **** ** do ******** ** **** than * ****. **'* estimate **** *** **** (example ******)."
  • "* ***** ******* **'* our ******* ******."
  • "** ***** ******** ******** under * *******, **** one ***** ******** ** 2."

*** ******** **** ** distintion ******* *** ******** being *** * *****/******* call, ** ** **** of * ****** *******. However, **** ********* ***** impact *** **** **** is ********* ****** ** the ********* ** ****** tools, ******* **, ** otherwise '****** * *** worthwhile'.

******* ******

******* ********* **** ******* estimated **** **** ** whether *** *** ** hanging * ****** ******, or ** ** ** one ** *******. ** every ****, *** '****** camera' ******** *** ****** than ** ** **** just *** ** * group:

  • "******** * **** - depends ** *** ****** of ******* ***** ****** like **** *******."
  • "*** (*) ****** ****, 3 *****. (******** ** site, ******* "********", ***.) If ***, (*) ******* on **** ******* ** hallways ***** **, * would *** * **** orientation *** **** * hour **** ******."
  • "** **** *** * single ****** ************, ***'** getting ****** *** * hours. *******, ** **** was * ******** ****** install, ***'* *** ** total ******* *** **** one. "
  • "* **** ** ** just * ****** ****** installation, ** **** **** 1 ****** *** ***** to ** ********* ** 0.45 *****/ ******."

*** ****** ****, *** estimate *** ****** *** fall ********* ** ********* of *****.

********?

** *** ********** * series ** ******* **** this *** *** ******. Do *** **** ********* or ******** ** ***** as ** ******* *******? We ***** ********** **** thoughts.  ****** ******* *****.

Comments (3)

I don't think you were asking about billable times, travel times, setup time, cleanup time, or anything else except mounting the camera. Is that correct? If I were standing in that room you picture with a ladder, 4 lightweight dome cameras, and the mounting hardware ready to go I could install them in 1 hour no problem. I'm not counting walking to truck, clean up, or anything else just install. If you take into account setup, clean up, trips to the truck, lunch etc., then you want to bill for an hour/camera to make a profit even though realistically any half way competent installer worth his weight should be able to 15+ in a single day.

I think this is something that is challenging for them to compile simply because of the way each person/company may handle estimation standards. Also, there is varying level of qualities from different technicians/company which impacts time frames.

For example: I worked at a company where our estimate was replicated at 2000 sites. Missing something that costs $10 would cause damages of $20k. The inverse was also true and could price us out of a project. We accounted for items as small as nuts and bolts in our estimates. Conversely, many conventional integrators I have worked within figure x hours per unit, throw some miscellaneous cost at it, and hope it all balances out in the end or beg for change orders.

Basically, each person will find loopholes in the methodology used to acquire and present the data. I think this is valiant effort and much like the NECA Estimation Guide it's to be used as a baseline, not a hard rule. NECA has had difficulty compiling their estimation book in a usable fashion for years, and it's still marginally useful. Unlike the NECA guides these IPVM time frames are actually applicable to our industry and not something like installing a distribution panel.

It does seem that some are answering in billable time estimates and yet others using stopwatch time estimates.

This is indicated in general by this statement

Several integrators noted they would not estimate under a certain limit, even if the task ultimately took less time.

and in particular by things like

2 hours because it's our minimum charge.

If this was a single camera installation, you're getting billed for 4 hours. However, if this was a multiple camera install, you'd get 30 total minutes for this one.

We never estimate mounting under 1 manhour, this one would probably be 2.

This may be the cause of the valley in the sample, the .5s being more realtime estimates and the 1.0s being more minimum charges.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,363 reports, 854 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming the "modular design allows for easy installation". We bought and...
Axis HD Analog Encoder Tested on Oct 11, 2019
Two years after declaring "Everything is IP", Axis has released their first HD analog encoder, the P7304, with support for AHD, CVI, TVI, and SD...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
Uniview Pro 4K Camera Tested (IPC3238ER3-DVZ) on Aug 29, 2019
In our 8MP / 4K Fixed Lens Camera Shootout, Uniview's low end 8MP was firmly in the middle of the pack. Does their higher end Pro Series 4K camera...
Bosch Starlight 8000i Cameras Tested on Jul 23, 2019
Bosch has released their new Flexidome IP Starlight 8000i cameras, claiming "exceptional detail even in extreme low-light situations." To see...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Pelco GFC 4K Dome Camera Tested (IMP831-1ERS) on Mar 12, 2019
Pelco has finally released their first 4K IP camera, after years of competitors' releases. Is this move too late? Or is their new GFC Professional...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...