Camera Labor Estimate: Low Tile / Grid Ceiling

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Nov 13, 2014

IPVM is launching the first surveillance labor estimate standard.

This is the first entry in that series.

Here, we report on a common scenario "Mounting a Camera in a Low Tile/Grid Ceiling." The actual survey question asked is:

"The location has 1/2" thick fiber acoustic tile suspended from grid, with no existing backing material or needed plenum rating, located 8' - 10' above the floor.  Cabling has previously been run and terminated to the mounting spot. How many manhours would you estimate for mounting a camera in the following area?  Why?"

We purposely reduced the question scope to only mounting the camera, and disclaimed tasks like running cable, configuring cameras, and adjusting VMS as separate tasks addressed by followup questions.

Below, we share estimates, key issues and drivers for installing in this scenario.

**** ** ********* *** ***** ************ ***** ******** ********.

**** ** *** ***** ***** ** **** ******.

****, ** ****** ** * ****** ******** "******** * ****** in * *** ****/**** *******." *** ****** ****** ******** ***** **:

"*** ******** *** */*" ***** ***** ******** **** ********* **** ****, **** ** ******** ******* ******** ** ****** ****** ******, located *' - **' ***** *** *****.  ******* *** ********** been *** *** ********** ** *** ******** ****. *** ************ ***** *** ******** *** ******** * ****** ** *** ********* area?  ***?"

** ********* ******* *** ******** ***** ** **** ******** *** camera, *** ********** ***** **** ******* *****, *********** *******, *** adjusting *** ** ******** ***** ********* ** ******** *********.

*****, ** ***** *********, *** ****** *** ******* *** ********** ** this ********.

[***************]

*******

**** **% ** *** ********* **** ******* *.* ** *.*********. *** **** ****** ** ***** *****:

*** ******* ** *** ******* ** *.** ******** *** **** ********.

Color **********

*** ******** ** ********* **** ****** *.** ** **** *****, and ******* ******* **** **** ********** ******** *** **** ** one********* ****:

  • "* ** *.* *** *****, **** ******* **** ****** ****"
  • "* **** *** ****** ********. ****** **** **** * **** ladder."
  • "* **** ***. ** *********** ********* ****** ** *.* ** 0.75. **** ******** ** *.**/** ******."
  • "*** *** **** ** **********. **** ** * ****** ***** install ******* * ****** * ** ****** ** * ********** environment **** ** **** *** **** *******.."
  • "* ***** *** **** ** * *** ****. ******** *** ****** would *** ** *** **** **** ********* ****, *** ***** need ** ***** **** ** ******* ***** *** ***** **** how *** ** ** ***** *** ***** ********."

**** **** ********* ********* **** ***** *****, ** *** ********* due ** ********* ********** ***** **** ***** *********** ** ****** focusing **** **** ******* *** ******** *****.  ***** ******* **** not ******** ** *** ************ *****.

**** *************: ******* **** ********

*** ****** ** *** ******* *** ********* ** *** ******** was ******* ** *** *** **** ****** ** ** ********** first. ** ************ *** *** ******* **** ******, ** ** avoid ******* *** ******* ** * ******** ******** ******** (**: Not ********** *** ** **** ******, ** *********). ** **** cases, ** ********** ********* **** *************, ***** ********* **** ******. 

  • "***** ** ***.  * **** ** ******* * ******* ****** the ******, *** *** ****, ******* *** ****** *** ****** and **** ***** **."
  • "* ***** ******** *** ****** ******* ** **** *.* *****. This ** *** ** ******* * ******** ******* ** ** installed ****** *-***** *** ******** ********."
  • "*** **** ***** * **** *** ** *** ** ***** the ****** ***** *** **** ** ***** *** ***** *** cables *** ** **** ** ******* *** **** ** *** camera ** ** **** ** *** *******."
  • "*.* **** ** *****. **** ** ******** *** ******** ** a **** **** *** **** ***-********** **** *** ******* ** address. ********** **** ****** ****, **** ***** ****, ***** ****** using * ****** ****-*****."
  • "* **** *******, ********* ** *** ****** *****. ** **** typically ******* * "***** ***" ******* **** ***** *** ****, and **** ******** *** ****** ** *** ******, ***** ** mounted ******* *** ****."

******** *****

******* *********** ***** **** ***** *** ******** ***** * ******* limit, **** ** *** **** ********** **** **** ****:

  • " ** **** ****** ** ********** ** **** *****. **'* ******** 0.5/hr.  ** *** ******* ** ***** ***** ** *** **** this ****** ** ** ******* *** **** *** ** ****** a **** **** ** **** ** ***** ** ******* ***** the **** ******** *** ****."
  • "** ** **** ** ** ******** ** **** **** * hour. **'* ******** **** *** **** (******* ******)."
  • "* ***** ******* **'* *** ******* ******."
  • "** ***** ******** ******** ***** * *******, **** *** ***** probably ** *."

*** ******** **** ** ********** ******* *** ******** ***** *** a *****/******* ****, ** ** **** ** * ****** *******. However, **** ********* ***** ****** *** **** **** ** ********* purely ** *** ********* ** ****** *****, ******* **, ** otherwise '****** * *** **********'.

******* ******

******* ********* **** ******* ********* **** **** ** ******* *** job ** ******* * ****** ******, ** ** ** ** one ** *******. ** ***** ****, *** '****** ******' ******** was ****** **** ** ** **** **** *** ** * group:

  • "******** * **** - ******* ** *** ****** ** ******* being ****** **** **** *******."
  • "*** (*) ****** ****, * *****. (******** ** ****, ******* "oriented", ***.) ** ***, (*) ******* ** **** ******* ** hallways ***** **, * ***** *** * **** *********** *** then * **** **** ******."
  • "** **** *** * ****** ****** ************, ***'** ******* ****** for * *****. *******, ** **** *** * ******** ****** install, ***'* *** ** ***** ******* *** **** ***. "
  • "* **** ** ** **** * ****** ****** ************, ** more **** * ****** *** ***** ** ** ********* ** 0.45 *****/ ******."

*** ****** ****, *** ******** *** ****** *** **** ********* to ********* ** *****.

********?

** *** ********** * ****** ** ******* **** **** *** our ******. ** *** **** ********* ** ******** ** ***** as ** ******* *******? ** ***** ********** **** ********.  ****** comment *****.

Comments (3)

Undisclosed Integrator #1

11/14/14 07:15pm

I don't think you were asking about billable times, travel times, setup time, cleanup time, or anything else except mounting the camera. Is that correct? If I were standing in that room you picture with a ladder, 4 lightweight dome cameras, and the mounting hardware ready to go I could install them in 1 hour no problem. I'm not counting walking to truck, clean up, or anything else just install. If you take into account setup, clean up, trips to the truck, lunch etc., then you want to bill for an hour/camera to make a profit even though realistically any half way competent installer worth his weight should be able to 15+ in a single day.

Undisclosed Integrator #2

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 11/14/14 07:26pm

I think this is something that is challenging for them to compile simply because of the way each person/company may handle estimation standards. Also, there is varying level of qualities from different technicians/company which impacts time frames.

For example: I worked at a company where our estimate was replicated at 2000 sites. Missing something that costs $10 would cause damages of $20k. The inverse was also true and could price us out of a project. We accounted for items as small as nuts and bolts in our estimates. Conversely, many conventional integrators I have worked within figure x hours per unit, throw some miscellaneous cost at it, and hope it all balances out in the end or beg for change orders.

Basically, each person will find loopholes in the methodology used to acquire and present the data. I think this is valiant effort and much like the NECA Estimation Guide it's to be used as a baseline, not a hard rule. NECA has had difficulty compiling their estimation book in a usable fashion for years, and it's still marginally useful. Unlike the NECA guides these IPVM time frames are actually applicable to our industry and not something like installing a distribution panel.

Roger Paine

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 12/04/14 07:40pm

It does seem that some are answering in billable time estimates and yet others using stopwatch time estimates.

This is indicated in general by this statement

Several integrators noted they would not estimate under a certain limit, even if the task ultimately took less time.

and in particular by things like

2 hours because it's our minimum charge.

If this was a single camera installation, you're getting billed for 4 hours. However, if this was a multiple camera install, you'd get 30 total minutes for this one.

We never estimate mounting under 1 manhour, this one would probably be 2.

This may be the cause of the valley in the sample, the .5s being more realtime estimates and the 1.0s being more minimum charges.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
Project Documentation Forms & Work Order Tutorial on Jan 07, 2019
This form may be one of the most important tools integrators ever have doing install and service work. Inside we provide a sample template form,...
The Battle For The VSaaS Market Begins 2019 - Alarm.com, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Verkada, More on Jan 02, 2019
2019 will be the year that VSaaS finally becomes a real factor for professional video surveillance. While Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS)...
US Gov China Ban Rules Process, SIA Lobbies Against 'Blacklisting', For 'Risk-Based Protocol' on Dec 27, 2018
Details have emerged about when the rules implementing the federal ban on Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei and others will be made public for official...
Startup Sunflower Labs' Autonomous Drone Security System on Dec 11, 2018
Startup Sunflower Labs is claiming a unique design on a home security system, combining autonomous drones and 'Sunflower' sensors. Imagine an...
Top 2019 Trend - AI Video Analytics on Dec 10, 2018
160+ Integrators answered: What do you think the top industry trend will be in 2019? Why? AI / video analytics was the run-away winner with...
Ubiquiti $79 Flex IP Camera Tested on Dec 07, 2018
U.S. Manufacturer Ubiquiti has released a 1080p, integrated IR IP camera, selling it directly for $79, making this one of the least expensive IP...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact