Camera Labor Estimate: Low Tile / Grid Ceiling

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Nov 13, 2014

IPVM is launching the first surveillance labor estimate standard.

This is the first entry in that series.

Here, we report on a common scenario "Mounting a Camera in a Low Tile/Grid Ceiling." The actual survey question asked is:

"The location has 1/2" thick fiber acoustic tile suspended from grid, with no existing backing material or needed plenum rating, located 8' - 10' above the floor.  Cabling has previously been run and terminated to the mounting spot. How many manhours would you estimate for mounting a camera in the following area?  Why?"

We purposely reduced the question scope to only mounting the camera, and disclaimed tasks like running cable, configuring cameras, and adjusting VMS as separate tasks addressed by followup questions.

Below, we share estimates, key issues and drivers for installing in this scenario.

**** ** ********* *** first ************ ***** ******** standard.

**** ** *** ***** entry ** **** ******.

****, ** ****** ** a ****** ******** "******** a ****** ** * Low ****/**** *******." *** ****** survey ******** ***** **:

"*** ******** *** */*" ***** fiber ******** **** ********* from ****, **** ** ******** backing ******** ** ****** plenum ******, ******* *' - **' ***** *** floor.  ******* *** ********** been *** *** ********** to *** ******** ****. How ************ ***** *** ******** *** mounting * ****** ** the ********* ****?  ***?"

** ********* ******* *** question ***** ** **** mounting *** ******, *** disclaimed ***** **** ******* cable, *********** *******, *** adjusting *** ** ******** tasks ********* ** ******** questions.

*****, ** ***** *********, *** issues *** ******* *** installing ** **** ********.

[***************]

*******

**** **% ** *** responses **** ******* *.* to *.*********. *** **** ****** is ***** *****:

*** ******* ** *** answers ** *.** ******** *** **** ********.

Color **********

*** ******** ** ********* fell ****** *.** ** each *****, *** ******* suggest **** **** ********** estimate *** **** ** one********* ****:

  • "* ** *.* *** hours, **** ******* **** little ****"
  • "* **** *** ****** mounting. ****** **** **** a **** ******."
  • "* **** ***. ** experienced ********* ****** ** 0.5 ** *.**. **** yourself ** *.**/** ******."
  • "*** *** **** ** sufficient. **** ** * ground ***** ******* ******* a ****** * ** ladder ** * ********** environment **** ** **** for **** *******.."
  • "* ***** *** **** ** 1 *** ****. ******** the ****** ***** *** be *** **** **** consuming ****, *** ***** need ** ***** **** to ******* ***** *** never **** *** *** it ** ***** *** these ********."

**** **** ********* ********* more ***** *****, ** was ********* *** ** including ********** ***** **** cable *********** ** ****** focusing **** **** ******* the ******** *****.  ***** results **** *** ******** in *** ************ *****.

**** *************: ******* **** Variable

*** ****** ** *** install *** ********* ** the ******** *** ******* or *** *** **** needed ** ** ********** first. ** ************ *** not ******* **** ******, as ** ***** ******* the ******* ** * specific ******** ******** (**: Not ********** *** ** grid ******, ** *********). In **** *****, ** installers ********* **** *************, ***** estimates **** ******. 

  • "***** ** ***.  * have ** ******* * backbox ****** *** ******, cut *** ****, ******* and ****** *** ****** and **** ***** **."
  • "* ***** ******** *** camera ******* ** **** 1.5 *****. **** ** due ** ******* * mounting ******* ** ** installed ****** *-***** *** ******** mounting."
  • "*** **** ***** * hour *** ** *** to ***** *** ****** since *** **** ** drill *** ***** *** cables *** ** **** to ******* *** **** of *** ****** ** be **** ** *** ceiling."
  • "*.* **** ** *****. This ** ******** *** mounting ** * **** that *** **** ***-********** with *** ******* ** address. ********** **** ****** tile, **** ***** ****, mount ****** ***** * wooden ****-*****."
  • "* **** *******, ********* on *** ****** *****. We **** ********* ******* a "***** ***" ******* that ***** *** ****, and **** ******** *** weight ** *** ******, which ** ******* ******* the ****."

******** *****

******* *********** ***** **** would *** ******** ***** a ******* *****, **** if *** **** ********** took **** ****:

  • " ** **** ****** ** increments ** **** *****. We'd ******** *.*/**.  ** the ******* ** ***** right ** *** **** this ****** ** ** install *** **** *** do ****** * **** hour ** **** ** there ** ******* ***** the **** ******** *** path."
  • "** ** **** ** do ******** ** **** than * ****. **'* estimate **** *** **** (example ******)."
  • "* ***** ******* **'* our ******* ******."
  • "** ***** ******** ******** under * *******, **** one ***** ******** ** 2."

*** ******** **** ** distintion ******* *** ******** being *** * *****/******* call, ** ** **** of * ****** *******. However, **** ********* ***** impact *** **** **** is ********* ****** ** the ********* ** ****** tools, ******* **, ** otherwise '****** * *** worthwhile'.

******* ******

******* ********* **** ******* estimated **** **** ** whether *** *** ** hanging * ****** ******, or ** ** ** one ** *******. ** every ****, *** '****** camera' ******** *** ****** than ** ** **** just *** ** * group:

  • "******** * **** - depends ** *** ****** of ******* ***** ****** like **** *******."
  • "*** (*) ****** ****, 3 *****. (******** ** site, ******* "********", ***.) If ***, (*) ******* on **** ******* ** hallways ***** **, * would *** * **** orientation *** **** * hour **** ******."
  • "** **** *** * single ****** ************, ***'** getting ****** *** * hours. *******, ** **** was * ******** ****** install, ***'* *** ** total ******* *** **** one. "
  • "* **** ** ** just * ****** ****** installation, ** **** **** 1 ****** *** ***** to ** ********* ** 0.45 *****/ ******."

*** ****** ****, *** estimate *** ****** *** fall ********* ** ********* of *****.

********?

** *** ********** * series ** ******* **** this *** *** ******. Do *** **** ********* or ******** ** ***** as ** ******* *******? We ***** ********** **** thoughts.  ****** ******* *****.

Comments (3)

Undisclosed Integrator #1

11/14/14 07:15pm

I don't think you were asking about billable times, travel times, setup time, cleanup time, or anything else except mounting the camera. Is that correct? If I were standing in that room you picture with a ladder, 4 lightweight dome cameras, and the mounting hardware ready to go I could install them in 1 hour no problem. I'm not counting walking to truck, clean up, or anything else just install. If you take into account setup, clean up, trips to the truck, lunch etc., then you want to bill for an hour/camera to make a profit even though realistically any half way competent installer worth his weight should be able to 15+ in a single day.

Undisclosed Integrator #2

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 11/14/14 07:26pm

I think this is something that is challenging for them to compile simply because of the way each person/company may handle estimation standards. Also, there is varying level of qualities from different technicians/company which impacts time frames.

For example: I worked at a company where our estimate was replicated at 2000 sites. Missing something that costs $10 would cause damages of $20k. The inverse was also true and could price us out of a project. We accounted for items as small as nuts and bolts in our estimates. Conversely, many conventional integrators I have worked within figure x hours per unit, throw some miscellaneous cost at it, and hope it all balances out in the end or beg for change orders.

Basically, each person will find loopholes in the methodology used to acquire and present the data. I think this is valiant effort and much like the NECA Estimation Guide it's to be used as a baseline, not a hard rule. NECA has had difficulty compiling their estimation book in a usable fashion for years, and it's still marginally useful. Unlike the NECA guides these IPVM time frames are actually applicable to our industry and not something like installing a distribution panel.

Roger Paine

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1 | 12/04/14 07:40pm

It does seem that some are answering in billable time estimates and yet others using stopwatch time estimates.

This is indicated in general by this statement

Several integrators noted they would not estimate under a certain limit, even if the task ultimately took less time.

and in particular by things like

2 hours because it's our minimum charge.

If this was a single camera installation, you're getting billed for 4 hours. However, if this was a multiple camera install, you'd get 30 total minutes for this one.

We never estimate mounting under 1 manhour, this one would probably be 2.

This may be the cause of the valley in the sample, the .5s being more realtime estimates and the 1.0s being more minimum charges.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Installation Course - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 12, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. Thursday, September 12th is your last chance to register for the...
Genetec Stratocast VSaaS Tested on Sep 05, 2019
The VSaaS market is rapidly expanding in 2019, with Verkada, Meraki, Eagle Eye, Avigilon and numerous startups growing their market share. When we...
Top Ways Security Integrators Improve Their Careers on Sep 03, 2019
With DIY products expanding and the future of integration debated, how do integrators stay sharp so they are not left behind? 180+ integrators...
Register Now - October 2019 IP Networking Course on Aug 28, 2019
Register now for the Fall 2019 IP Networking Course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
US Government Ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei Takes Effect Now on Aug 13, 2019
The 'prohibition on use or procurement' of Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei products and 'essential components' take effect today, August 13, 2019, one...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Milestone "GDPR-ready" Certification Claim Critiqued on Aug 12, 2019
Milestone is touting that its latest XProtect VMS is "GDPR-ready" with a 'European Privacy Seal'. However, our investigation raises significant...

Most Recent Industry Reports

How Cobalt Robotics May Disrupt Security on Sep 13, 2019
While security robots have largely become a joke over the last few years, one organization, Cobalt Robotics, has raised $50+ million from top US...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
ASIS GSX 2019 Show Report Final on Sep 12, 2019
IPVM went to Chicago for ASIS GSX 2019, with many exhibitors disappointed about traffic and the exhibitor schedule changing next year. Inside we...
Installation Course - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 12, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. Thursday, September 12th is your last chance to register for the...
Commend ID5 Intercom Tested on Sep 12, 2019
Commend touts the new ID5 intercom as 'timelessly elegant' and the slim body, glass front touchscreen indeed looks better than common, but ugly,...
US State Department: "Chinese Tech Giants" "Tools of the Chinese Communist Party" on Sep 12, 2019
The US State Department has called out "Chinese tech giants" for being "tools of the Chinese Communist Party" in a blunt new speech that makes...
Uniview OEM Directory on Sep 11, 2019
This directory lists 20+ companies that OEM products from Uniview, with a graphic and links to company websites below. It does not cover all...
Yi Home Camera 3 AI Analytics Tested on Sep 10, 2019
Yi Technology is claiming "new AI features" in its $50 Home Camera 3 "eliminates 'false positives' caused by flying insects, small pets, or light...
Hanwha Announces 32MP Camera + AI Line on Sep 10, 2019
In the first rise in maximum megapixel resolution in 5 years, Hanwha has announced a 32MP / 8K camera directly competing with Avigilon's H4 30MP /...
Fingerprints for Access Control Guide on Sep 09, 2019
Users can lose badges, but they never misplace a finger, right? The most common biometric used in access are fingerprints, and it has become one...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact