Fingerprint Readers Examined

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on May 15, 2014

They all claim to do the same thing, but no two fingerprint readers are alike. How do you make sure you are choosing the correct model for your access system? 

In this note we cover the design differences between reader options, explain who the major player are and which types they offer, and simplify the process of choosing the right unit for your job.

Fingerprint ****** *****

****** ***** ****** *****, fingerprint ****** ******* *** not ******* ** ********* basic ********** ******* *** communication *********. * ****** survey ** *** ****** reveals ******** ** ************* offering ********* ** ******, but *** ****** *** be ******* ******* ********* a *** ***** **********:

  • ****** ****
  • ***** *********
  • **** ******
  • ******** ************** *******
  • ******** *******
  • ************* **********
  • ****

** *** ******* *****, we ********* ** **** point.

Specification *******

****** ****

*** **** ********* ** any *********** ****** ** the ****** ** **** to ******* *********** ***********. Mainstream ****** ******* *** designed ***** '*******' ** 'capacitive' ******* **** ******* the **** ******** ***********. Optical ***** ******* ****** of ************ *** ******* the ****** **** ********** capture ******, ***** ********** types ******* *** ********** resistance ** ***** ******** over *** ****** ****. 

**** ****** *****, *** even '******' ******* ********* both, *** **** ** mainstream ****** *************, ** this ****** ********* ******* demonstrates:

***** **********

*** **** ** '********', or ******* *** ****** is ********* *********** ** different *************. ****** ********** alone ** *** ************* enough ** ******* ****** prints **** ********** ******* users, ** ****** ****** add ********** '****-********' ****** to ***** *****.

****** ******** ******* '********* *********' ** '************ (*****) *********' **** ******** * finger ** **** *** attached ** * ***** body, ***** ***-****** ********** ******** **************** *** ************ *** depth ** ******, *** only *** ********* **** prints. *** ****** *** sophistication ** '****-********' ******* added ** * ****** range **** **** ** less ********* ****** ** five ** **** ** 'high-security' ****** ** *** expensive ***** ** *******.

**** ******

**** *** ******, ******* the ***** ******** ******* so ** ** **** the *******, *** ****** and ********* ****** *** production *** ** * challenge. ** * ******, mainstream ****** *** ******* in * ***** ** sizes *** ******* ****** to **** **** **** available **** ******. *** all **** ******* ***** the **** ****** ** features, ** ******/***** ******* mount ***** ******** * few ****** **** * compact ********* ******** ** full ***** **** ** stand-alone ********** **** *** weigh * ****** *** take ** ******** ****** **** ** mounting *****.

******** ************** *******

** * ******, **** openings ******* **** **** than *** ********** ** verify * ****. **** fingerprint ******* *********** ******* different ****** ********* *******, contactless **** ******* ** face *** *******.

******** *******

*** *** ******* ***** fingerprint ********* *******. **** readers *** ******** ** keep *** *********** ** a ******* ********, ***** others ** *** ***** the *********** ** ***, instead ********* ** ** be ****** ** * smartcard **** **** ***** be ********* ** **** a ******. *** ******* storage, ************ *****, *** level ** *********** **** central ********* 

************* **********

*** **** '***********' ****** applications, * ****** ** connected ** * ********** by ******* ********. *******, *** all *********** ******* *********** directly ** *** ********** and **** ******* *** other ******, ****** ******** USB, ** ******** ***********, with **** ****** ************ ************. *** **** ****** for * ***** *********** depends ** *** ***** of *********** **** ** access ********, *** ***** features ********* ** *** reader, *** *** **** of ********** *** ****** inputs *********** ***.

****

**** ***** ********** *******, fingerprint ******* *** ******* in * **** ***** of ***** ******; **** this ~$** ******* ** to $*** - $*** for * ***** ****** with ** ********** ********** readers. ** *******, ***** that ***** ****** *********** and '****-********' ******* **** more. 

*******, ** **** **** several ** ***** ***** and ****** ** *** results ** *** ******** 'Fingerprint ****** ********'.

Company ********

**** ** ***** ** reader ********** *** ******, the ****** ** ***** is *******. ** ******* some ** *** ********** access ****** ******* *****:

 

*** ******

 

*** ** *** ******* names ** *********** ** also ** * ***** of ****** ********* *** fingerprint ****** *********. *** offered******* *********, ******* ****** ***** '********' ******* *** * number ** *****, *** the ******* ********* ******* sensor ************ ******** *** plans ** ****** *** entire ****. 

 

  • ****** ****:**** **** ** ******* sensor
  • ***** *********:*****-******** *** ********* ************ measures *** ******** ** all ******.
  • **** ******:* ****** **** ***** sized *****
  • ******** ************** *******:***** **** ** ****** with * ****** *** card ******
  • ******** *******: ******** ******** *** **** ** store * *********** ******** onto * ********* *** present *** **** ****** reading ** ******* *** reader **** * *********** for **********. **** ******* simplifies *********** ** ****** card ******* *** ********* speeds ** *** ************ process ** ******* **** large ******* ** *****, but ****** ****** ** multi-factor ************* **** **** require **********.
  • ************* **********:******* ****
  • ****:~$*** ******* ******** ************ 

 

******

*** ** *** ******* 'high ********' ****** *** to * ******* ** multi-national ******* *** ************,***************** *****************-* ********/*********. *** ********* ******* offers * ***** ***** of ******* ******** ** stand-alone ****** *******, **** and ********** ********, ** fingerprint ******* ******** ** larger *******.

  • ****** ****:**** ****** *** ******* sensors, *** **** ** the ********* *** **********.
  • ***** *********:**** ******** ****** ******* several ****** ** '****-********'.
  • **** ******:**** ***** *** **** sized ** **** *****.
  • ******** ************** *******:* ***** ** ****** feature ********** ******* (*******/*** formats) *** *******
  • ******** *******:*********** *********** ** ****** on *** ******.
  • ************* **********:**** ****** *** ** connected, *** ****** *** Wiegand ******* *** *******.
  • ****:*** *******'* ********* **************-****,******* ********* ******* ******* **** **** $***, to*****-**********, ******* *****, ** connected*** '***** *********' **** security ********* ******* $**** or ****.

*******

****** ***** ******* ****** a ***** ** ******** target ****** *** ******'* high ***, *** ********* includes * ****** ** connectivity *******, **** ****** options, *** *****-************** ******* on ********** ****** ********. Suprema ***** ** *** US ****** **************** ********** *** ***** ******* to * ****** ** access *********, **************, ******** *****, ******* ******. 

  • ****** ****:****** '**** ********' ****** use * ***** ******, the **** *** ******* types.
  • ***** *********:**** ********* ****** ******* multi ******, *** *** include ********* '********' *********.
  • **** ******:* **** ***** ** models, **** ******* ***** to ********** *** *******, and **** ******* ****** support multi-factor ***********.
  • ******** ************** *******:*** ******** ** *** Suprema ***** ******* ******** factors, ********* * ****** with *** *********** ******* for ******* **** ***** at ****.
  • ******** *******:***** ***** ********* ****** the **** ** ** a ********* ******** ********* on *************.
  • ************* **********:**** ***** ******* ******** ********** busses, **** **, *****/***, and ******* ****** ** most ** *** ****. 
  • ****:***** *** *******'* ********* are****** ******* ******, *** connected ******* ******* **** **** $** to**** ******** '******' ******, dual-finger, '***** *********' *****-***** readers******* $****+.

******

******** *****, *** ******* under * ****** ** brands, *** ******** ************ offers ******-*****, *************, ** *********, optical*********** ****** *** **** than $**.  ***** *** company ***** ** '**** security' ****** ** ********** on ****-******** ********, *** low ***** ***** ******** attention. 

  • ****** ****:**** ***** ******* ******* sensor, ******** ****** ***** may ****** ***** ** component ************.
  • ***** *********:**** *******
  • **** ******:**** ******* ****
  • ******** ************** *******:******* *** ****** **** readers ******** ** *** models
  • ******** *******:******* ****
  • ************* **********:** *** ******* *** claimed, *** ******* ** evaluation.
  • ****:*** ******* *** *** of *** ****** ** covered ****, **** *** 'F7' ***** ******* **** $35 - $** ** Amazon. 

Shootout ******

** *** ******* ***** from **** ** *** above ******* ** *** upcoming "*********** ********', ***** we **** ***** *********** and ******* ******* ** see ***** *************** **** the ********** ** **** world *******.

Comments (13)

What about US company Innometriks which was just deployed in Manchester and Baltimore?

(note: I am not affliated or associated with them at all)

I know a few years ago, Innometriks was using Lumidigm sensors, so I think we'll have the overall performance covered. However, its a good suggestion for future tests.

Has anyone ever deployed fingerprint readers in a heavy industrial environment (power plants, chemical plants, etc.)? We're looking at a possible application but many of our employees hands are coated with grease residues from the shop floor part of which remains even after they wash. Does this increase the number of false negatives? Is there a technology to overcome this problem?

Thanks,

Tim Lawson

Hello Tim:

Part of our shootout will be testing read accuracy/sensor performance when fingers are 'subprime', ie: soiled, wet, oily, etc.

I've got a whole mess of grease and cutting oils, but it you have a specific chemical recommendation (no acids please), I'd love to hear it.

Thanks,

Maybe include the IEvo in the test. It claims to work under all conditions.

http://www.ievoreader.com/

Sonovation seems right up your alley. Though the fact the Brian didn't mention these guys himself makes me think either he doesn't believe their claims or that they will actually release a product anytime soon...

Startup: Fingerprint Reading through Gloves

"[Sonovation] ultrasonic fingerprint sensors read not just the surface fingerprint ridges and swirls, like conventional optical sensors. Instead, using ultrasound they extract a dynamic, deep tissue and vascular map of the fingertip that encompasses all seven layers of the epidermis, plus the underlying fat pad, fascia, microvascular and vascular, plus the arterial blood flow, bone structure, and nail bed."

Thanks for linking to that Rukmini.

Sonovation is 'not ready for the primetime' yet. They have an interesting tech, but it is years away from showing up as part of physical access reader design.

...but it is years away from showing up...

These days, years away is forever and day away. They act like they have started their beta program or are just about to. What do you think the biggest challange is? The innovation or integration?

Because if, and its a big if, there are no show-stoppers with this beta product, and it actually can come close to standard sensor performance in terms of accuracy, speed, reliability isn't that the hardest part? Even if it is not using any common protocol?

Can the FOB only recognize one print? Even if it could only do 100 you should be able to make it a residential reader, no?

Regarding the deployment of fingerprint readers for users in heavy industrial environments, you need to use a technology that can read beyond the dirt and surface of the finger and into the layer behind the skin. Most optical based technologies do not do too well with dirty or wet or too dry fingers.

Our experience with deploying fingerprint based time and attendance machines at a sugar plantation yielded a very large number of read failures. Workers with sugar cane sap on their fingers cannot be read (even though we were able to enroll these workers previously). So many people ended up having to use proximity cards instead.

Also note that people who work with their hands like bricklayers will likely have trouble with most optical based technologies since their fingerprints will be worn off the surface of the skin.

It would be interesting to see how the Lumidigm readers perform with multi-spectral scanning in such scenarios. Ultrasonic technology also seems promising since it can read beyond the surface.

I'm a green card holder and at my last renewal they were using a large Safran multi-finger biometric capture device. I asked the woman taking my fingerprints how often they run into a problem. Surprisingly she said that she was not-registerable herslef and that the number runs around 2%.

So biometrics are good, but it seems you need to be prepared to have an alternative in most environments.

This is a good article discussing those 'Born without Fingerprints' which contributes to that 2%.

Interesting, that must be what this woman had.

Personally, I am finding that the security-breach risks of any form of biometrics to be too great of a risk.

If my password is compromised, I can change it. If I use two-factor PIN, then it changes every minute. If my fingerprint, hand, iris, etc. is compromised, then what?

Given the prevalence of tamper-proof credit card readers that capture the data, capturing biometrics is coming.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott has officially signed a biometric ban in Florida prohibiting schools from collecting biometrics: palm scans, iris scans or fingerprints of its students.

I went to an amusement park this year with my new season pass. They asked me to put my finger on a sensor. I said "I'd rather not", and they simply asked for me to show ID.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Storage

Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...
Directory of 30+ VSaaS / Cloud Video Surveillance Providers on Jun 07, 2019
This directory provides a list of VSaaS / cloud video surveillance providers to help you see and research what options are available. 2019 State...
Startup Rhombus Systems Says Twice the Features, Half the Price of Verkada on Jun 04, 2019
Closed cloud systems may be the fastest growing segment of video surveillance with Meraki and Verkada. Now another California company is joining...
Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 03, 2019
Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate. In...
OWAL Startup Profile - Ex-Googler Cloud AI Video Platform on May 29, 2019
OWAL, a NYC-based startup developing AI video analytics, is aiming to "improve the quality of life" within high-rise apartments, and commercial...
Verkada Favorability Results 2019 on May 29, 2019
Verkada has taken the industry by storm with the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever and a half billion dollar valuation....
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
LenelS2 Launches VRx Video Platform on Apr 29, 2019
For years, S2's video management platform, the NetVR, was based on Exacq. Now, after years of internal development, S2 has launched its own...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hikvision Colorvu Camera Tested on Jun 24, 2019
Hikvision says their new ColorVu line captures "vivid chromatic images in darkness", with unconventional white light illuminations whereas most...
China Subway Facial Recognition System Examined on Jun 24, 2019
A China city of 6+ million people has installed facial recognition-enabled gates in subways, allowing commuters to enter stations by simply showing...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
Genetec Beats Milestone For IHS #1 on Jun 21, 2019
For years, Milestone has touted that they are the #1 VMS. Now, Genetec has beaten them in IHS rankings. But what is this? Even other manufacturers...
Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Exacq Remote Cloud Access Tested on Jun 20, 2019
Remote cloud access has been missing from most VMSes (including Exacq and Milestone). Now, Exacq, after releasing Cloud Drive Storage earlier in...
Briefcam Buys Frost Award* on Jun 20, 2019
Frost 'awards' are well-known and widely disrespected. Now Briefcam is touting their win. The way it has worked for many years is that Frost...
IFSEC 2019 Show Report on Jun 19, 2019
The UK's largest trade show, IFSEC, is underway and IPVM has been examining what is new and happening at the show. Inside, we cover: Huawei...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact