FDA Defines Correct Operation of "Fever Cameras"

By: Charles Rollet, Published on May 26, 2020

The US FDA has now defined the correct operation of "Thermal Imaging Systems", colloquially known as "fever cameras".

IPVM Image

Many in video surveillance have interpreted the FDA's decision to temporarily lift 510(k) clearance requirements for fever cameras to mean that 'anything goes', ignoring well-established global standards.

However, this latest FDA guidance show that even amid a fever camera Gold Rush, the agency believes such systems need to be set up and operated "correctly".

In this we post, we examine this new FDA document, including:

  • Background: FDA Studies Show Fever Cam Operation Importance
  • FDA Statement to IPVM
  • Fever Cameras "Only Effective" Under These Conditions
  • "Careful" Setup Needed
  • What Is A Right Environment?
  • Secondary Confirmation A Must
  • Remove Hats, Glasses, Hair Obstructions/ Wait 15 Minutes
  • Process People One At A Time, No "Mass Fever Screening"
  • Locations Recommended: Airports, Offices, Supermarkets, Concerts, Hospital ERs
  • No Distance Recommendation, But Clearly Close
  • Blackbody Only Required If Manufacturer Recommends

Fever Cameras "Work Effectively Only" Under These Conditions

In its new recommendations (issued May 13) the FDA says fever cameras only work effectively when all 4 elements below are true:

IPVM Image

The most fundamental issue is that vendors are overwhelmingly marketing passive screening of anyone walking by wearing whatever while the FDA, consistent with global standards, is making clear that people must follow instructions.

Remove Hats, Glasses, Hair Obstructions/ Wait 15 Minutes

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

In particular, the FDA says a person's "whole face" should be measured without face obstructions (e.g., masks, glasses, hats, scarves, hair):

IPVM Image

The FDA even recommends people wait "at least 15 minutes" in the "measurement room" to make sure their face skin temperature is not affected by outdoor weather.

In real life, the 15 minutes recommendation is certain to be difficult to implement, with people likely unwilling to wait around in a room to be processed. However, the opposite is frequently happening with people being screened outdoors or immediately upon walking into a facility with the fever camera commonly pointed at the front door.

Process People One At A Time, No "Mass Fever Screening"

The FDA explicitly says "only one person" should be measured at a time:

IPVM Image

The agency states that fever cams which read several people at once "have not been shown to be accurate":

IPVM Image

Finally, the FDA recommends against "mass fever screening" of people":

IPVM Image

As IPVM has noted before, this goes counter to some manufacturers, such as Sunell which showcased its Panda Cam measuring over 40 people at once:

IPVM Image

Update: IPVM asked the FDA on what evidence (e.g. tests or data) they based their determination that screening multiple people is not accurate. They told us that there was no scientific literature that indicates success for mass screening with a fever camera, and that there were technical issues (like not having enough pixels, bad angles) when measuring multiple people.

Proper Setup Example

The FDA supplies this illustration showing a good fever cam setup:

IPVM Image

It's worth noting that the fever cam (Infrared Thermograph or "IRT") should be positioned parallel to the target's face, not higher up/angled as some manufacturers have shown, e.g. this Dahua video:

IPVM Image

What Is A Right Environment?

A good environment must have stable room temperature, low humidity, and avoid harsh lighting, air conditioning drafts, and direct sunlight:

IPVM Image

Locations Recommended: Airports, Offices, Supermarkets, Concerts, Hospital ERs

The FDA says fever cams may not be a good option for nursing homes as a single missed fever could spread disease, so a more accurate/thorough solution should be implemented.

However, for "airports, workplaces, grocery stores, concert venues" and "other areas where you are trying to screen large groups", fever cameras "could be considered" as "part of a larger approach to risk management."

The FDA also recommends fever cams for hospital emergency rooms in order to "quickly assess temperature and triage patients":

IPVM Image

Secondary Confirmation A Must

Fever cams cannot be solely relied upon to determine if someone has a fever, requiring confirmation "by another method":

IPVM Image

While this policy does not elaborate what secondary method should be used to confirm a fever, in previous guidance, the FDA recommended thermometers, specifically "non-contact infrared thermometer (NCIT) or clinical grade contact thermometer".

Blackbody Only Required If Manufacturer Recommends

The FDA states that "some devices do not require" a blackbody and they should only be used if the manufacturer recommends it. If so, it should be turned on 30 minutes prior to heat up:

IPVM Image

Indeed, not all fever cam solutions require blackbodies. Hikvision salespeople have recommended not using blackbodies (unlike Dahua) and FLIR does not recommend them with their specific EST lines. However, in our testing of Hikvision without a blackbody we found significantly increased accuracy problems and do not recommend such an approach. Our testing of FLIR is ongoing currently and we plan to release that report in early June.

No Distance Recommendation, But Clearly Close

The FDA doesn't give a specific distance recommendation, however, its examples all show people positioned close to the camera:

IPVM Image

The FDA says "follow the manufacturers instructions" when it comes to a specific distance.

Background: FDA Studies Show the Importance of Proper Operation

FDA scientists have published two studies on fever cam operation (one last year and another just this month) showing the importance of correct implementation, e.g. all face obstructions were removed while subjects were screened one-at-a-time and even made to wait 15 minutes prior to being processed.

The most recent study found, conclusively, that sticking to International Fever Cam Standards (which are detailed and strict) increases fever cam accuracy:

adherence to international consensus guidelines regarding IRT [infrared thermograph] system specifications and implementation contributes to optimization of measurement accuracy and detection of febrile individuals

FDA Statement to IPVM

IPVM asked the FDA why it issued this document and how it contrasts with its decision to temporarily relax the 510(k) clearance requirement last month.

The FDA told us that this guidance help "explain how to correctly use these devices" and that it may review anyone "marketing thermography devices in ways that pose risks to public health". Below is their full statement:

The FDA recognizes the increased interest in telethermographic systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. We provided an update to our website to help users and the public understand the benefits and limitations of these devices, and their role during the public health emergency. The update helps explain how to correctly use these devices to accurately measure someone’s temperature and clarifies questions around different environments in which these devices could be used. This information should be used in conjunction with the guidance issued in April.

This guidance does not change existing regulations or requirements; instead, it announces that the FDA does not intend to object, under the circumstances described in the guidance and where such use does not create undue risk, to the distribution and use of certain devices without compliance with certain regulations and requirements, in order to help protect public health during this emergency.

As the agency always does, if the FDA receives information that a manufacturer is marketing a medical device in violation of regulations, the FDA prioritizes review of such action based on risk to public health and available resources. If the FDA receives information that indicates manufacturers are marketing thermography devices in ways that pose risks to public health, the same principles would apply to the review of that information.

Conclusion

Now that the FDA has publicly announced correct operation steps, US sellers have little excuse to ignore them, and may risk legal action if the FDA determines their setups "pose risks to public health".

11 reports cite this report:

Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Temperature Screening From The Protection Bureau and ZKTeco Violate IEC Standards and FDA Correct Operation on Jun 22, 2020
ZKTeco and integrator The Protection Bureau are marketing an installation that violates IEC febrile screening standards, FDA correct operation, and...
Convergint Refuses To Fix Faked Fever Marketing, FTC Complaint Filed on Jun 19, 2020
Since Convergint has refused to fix their faked fever camera marketing, IPVM has filed a complaint with the US Federal Trade Commission which...
ZKTeco SpeedFace+ Are Medical Devices, Per FDA Definition, Contrary Claims Are False on Jun 12, 2020
ZKTeco SpeedFace+ series products are medical devices as defined by the US FDA. Contrary claims made by ZKTeco are false. In May, IPVM...
Dahua and Hikvision Fever Cameras Endanger French and Scottish Nursing Homes on Jun 09, 2020
Dahua and Hikvision fever cameras are being used at, respectively, French and Scottish nursing homes, violating international fever scanning...
Bleenco "Under The Tongue" Temperature Detection Examined on Jun 05, 2020
"Say aah", says Bleenco, a PPE detection video analytics company, offering a different method for measuring body temperature with a thermal...
"Fever Camera" Online Show June 2020 - On-Demand Recordings on Jun 03, 2020
IPVM has successfully completed the world's first "Fever Camera" show. Recordings from both days are posted at the end of this report for on-demand...
Optris "Fever Screening Systems" Examined on Jun 01, 2020
German manufacturer Optris has been building temperature measuring instruments for industrial manufacturing for over 15 years, and thermal cameras...
Fever Cameras Are Medical Devices, Per The FDA, Dahua, Feevr, Hikvision, InVid Contrary Claims Are False on May 28, 2020
Fever cameras are medical devices, despite what euphemisms various sellers use. The US FDA clearly categorizes them as medical devices and...
Comments (29) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

FDA Gives Guidance on 'Coronavirus' Thermal Fever Detection Systems on Mar 30, 2020
The US FDA has given IPVM guidance on the use of thermal fever detection systems being marketed for coronavirus, as an explosion of such devices...
FLIR A Series Temperature Screening Cameras Tested on Jun 04, 2020
FLIR is one of the biggest names in thermal and one of the most conservative. While rivals have marketed fever detection, FLIR has stuck to EST...
ONVIF Wire Free Camera Tested (Netgear FlexPower) on Oct 31, 2017
Totally wire-free cameras are a hot growth market. But they have had one major problem: Proprietary. IPVM has tested Netgear's Arlo and Arlo Go,...
World IEC Fever Screening Standards Explained on May 04, 2020
While 'fever detection' is new to most people, the technology has been practiced for many years and has a series of international standards that we...
Access Control Commissioning / Install Checklist on Aug 03, 2017
This 80+ point checklist helps end users, integrators and consultants verify that access control installation is complete. It covers the following...
Vivotek 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (FE9391-EV) on May 08, 2018
Next in our 12MP fisheye camera evaluation, we bought and tested Vivotek's latest generation FE9391-EV, a new model claiming improved smart IR...
The Access Control Codes Guide: IBC, NFPA 72, 80 & 101 on Nov 07, 2019
For access, there is one basic maxim: Life safety above all else. But how do you know if all applicable codes are being followed? While the...
Hikvision Fever Screening Thermal Solutions Examined on Apr 13, 2020
Hikvision is marketing "safer, faster, smarter" with their Fever Screening Thermal Solutions, (renamed last week to Temperature Screening Series),...
Detecting Coronavirus Fevers With Thermal Cameras on Mar 15, 2020
MAY 2020 Update: This post was our early examination of these systems being used in the pandemic. For more up to date coverage, see The Booming...
FDA "Does Not Intend to Object" To Unapproved Fever Detection Cameras If No 'Undue Risk' on Apr 17, 2020
The US FDA has declared it will not go after the many companies marketing unapproved fever detection cameras during the coronavirus public health...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Startup Duranc Presents AI VSaaS on Jul 06, 2020
Duranc presented its system at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from Duranc including IPVM Q&A Background on the...
Low Voltage Nation Wants to "Help You Carve Out A Fulfilling Career" Interviewed on Jul 06, 2020
It is difficult to make your way in this industry as there is little formal schooling. However, one person, Blake Urmos, the Founder of Low Voltage...
The Next Hot Fever Detection Trend - $100 Wall-Mounted Units on Jul 06, 2020
The first wave of the booming fever detecting market was $10,000+ cameras, now interest for ~$2,000 tablets is high and the next big thing may be...
Cisco Meraki Unlocks IP Cameras With RTSP Tested on Jul 06, 2020
Meraki opened up its cameras to 3rd party NVRs/VMSes by offering RTSP streaming because of "the need to solve a business problem". We tested...
Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM is 'not a good look' and that 'IPVM should never be your source of...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI Face Recognition on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI face recognition and mask detection offering at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Uniview Wrist Temperature Reader Tested on Jul 02, 2020
Uniview is promoting measuring wrist temperatures whereas most others are just offering forehead or inner canthus measurements. But how well does...
Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...