Favorite Access Control Credentials 2016

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Nov 07, 2016

When it comes to the most popular way to unlock an access controlled door, which credential type holds the favored spot among integrators?

The contenders:

  • 125 kHz
  • 13.56 Mhz
  • Biometrics
  • Others (e.g. pins)

Integrators answered:

"Which credential is your favorite? Why?"

We break down the results inside including fobs vs cards and HID vs NXP formats.

**** ** ***** ** the **** ******* *** to ****** ** ****** controlled ****, ***** ********** type ***** *** ******* spot ***** ***********?

*** **********:

  • *** ***
  • **.** ***
  • **********
  • ****** (*.*. ****)

*********** ********:

"***** ********** ** **** favorite? ***?"

** ***** **** *** results ****** ********* **** vs ***** *** *** vs *** *******.

[***************]

13.56 *** ******* *** ********

**** **** **% ** the ***** *****, **.** MHz "**********" **** *** top ****.

*** ***** ***** ********** the ****** *********:

***** **** *** ***** types, ** **** ****** open-ended **** ** '*****' option ** *****-** ***** not ********. *** ********** each ****** ******** ******* in *** **** *****:

  • *** *** *********** (** Prox, **** **):**%
  • **.** *** *********** (******, ******): **%
  • ********** (***********/**********/****/****): *%
  • ******: *%

Previous *******

**** ** ********* ******** ** ****, *** ********* *** similar. ****, ** ***, the ******* ********** *** 13.56 *** "**********", **** the **** **** ******-**** 125 *** *************** **********.

Contactless ** (*****) ****

*** ********* ******* ******** continues ** ** **** 'Contactless' **.** *** *** 125 *** (********** ****** *******) ***********, ******** ******* in **%+ ** *** vote. **** ********** ** bolstered ** *** **** these ***** *** ********* inexpensive ** *****, *******, and ***** ****** ** picture ** ******.

******* ** ******** ** biometric ** ********** ***** options ** *** ******, the ******* ********** ********** and *** ** *********** formats ****** **** *** top ******** ** *** changing ******* ****.

13.56 *** ** *** ***?

****** '***********' ***** *** two ***** *******: *** older, *********** *** *** type, *** *** ****** capacity, *********, *** ***** 13.56 *** ****. ***** the ******-********* ******* **** mentioned *** *****, *** older, ****-*******, *********** *** kHz ***** ***** ****** significant ***********:

  • "** ******* ****** *** **.***** I **** *** *** standards *** *** ** install *** ********** **** readers ** *********** * customer **********. ** **** many ****** ********* ***** using *** ******."
  • "**.*****. ****** ******** **** prox, ** **** ********** in *****"
  • "****** ****. **** ** carry. ***********. ***** ****** widely ********."
  • "***** ***** *** *** as ***** ** ****** prox *** **** **** secure *** *** ******* to ***** ****** ***** per ******** **** ** much ***** ****** ** duplicates."
  • "*** *** (***). ****** cost. *** ******* *** of **** **** ****** interest ** **** ******** options."
  • "[**.** ***]****** ** ** ****. Secure, ********, *** **** effective."
  • "*** ****. ******, *****'*' require ************ **** ***** and ************* ******."

Fobs **. *****

********** **** ******* **** often ***** ** ***************. While *********** ********* **** contactless ***** ** ******** forms, ******* ***** ******** for * ******** ****.

**** ******* * ******** preference, ******* (**** ******* dongles ******* **** ** keyrings) *** ***** (***** PVC ****** **** ***** credentials) **** ********* *********, while ****** *** ******** were ********* *** **** often. ***** ******** ********:

****

  • "*** ****, ** **** attach ** ********* *** seem ** ** **** likely ** *********."
  • "****, ** **** *** be *** **** *********. People **** *** ** lose/ ******** **** ** often."
  • "*'* * *** ** fobs ******* ** ***** durability. ***** ***** *** wear **** *** ******."
  • "******* *** **** ****** than ***** *** *** nicely ** * *** ring."

*****

  • "*'* * *** ** clam ***** *****, **** fit ** *** ****** as ******* ** **** Keys ** **** ***** I **** ** **** my **** ******."
  • "***** ***** **** * printed ***** ** ***. iClass **** ******** *** future."
  • "***** **** **** *******."
  • "***** *** *** ***** pictures *** ***** *** can ** ****** **** compared **** ****."

*** ********** ***** **** preference ***** ** ** differentiated ** ******:

  • "*** **** *** ***** and **** ***** *** men. ***** **** ** prefer ** *** **** on *** **** **** their *** **** ***** men **** ** ****** to *** *** **** in ***** ******."

HID ****** **. *** *******

*** ********** **** ************* dominate *** ***** **** in ******** ****** *******. As ******** ** ****** ** *** ***************, *** ******** ** the *****'* *********** *** formats ********* ** ***** vendors. ** *******, *** fee ******** *** ** their ******* *** *** 'Prox' *** **.** *** 'iClass' *******, ***** *** 'open ******** (**** ** low-cost)' ***** ****** *** DESFire *******.

********** ** ***** *******, HID ******* **** **** often *****:

  • "*** ******. ** ***** to ** *** **** popular, **** ** ********, and ******."
  • "*** ** *** ********* in *** ********** *****."
  • "* **** *** *** the ***** ******* ****'** widely ********** **** **% of **** ****** ******* platforms."
  • "****** **** ********* ****. Secure, **** **********, ************ with ********** ************."
  • "*** **********. ** **** always **** ***** ** they *** *** **** popular *** *** ** our ****** **** **** them."

*******, ** ****** *** other ***** ** *** world, *** ******* **** MIFARE *** ******* **** cited **** *****:

  • "*** *** ****** ******** are ****** ****. *** credentials *** ***** ******* and *** ******** ** a *** ****** **** the **-*** *****."
  • "****** ******* *** ****** demand *** **** ********"
  • "******* ** ** ** secure *** *** *** been *******."
  • "************* *** ** **** of ******** ****** *** programming."

******* *********** ********* ********** and ********** **** *** and *** **** *******, with *** ******** ******* generally *********** ***** **** is ****:

  • "* **** *** ****** iClass ** ** ****** EV1. ** ****** ****, the ******** ** ********* locked ** * ****** card *** ****** ************."

PINs *** **** ***

******* ***** *** ** the ******* ******** *********** in ***, ******* ********* that **** ** ***** are *********, ********* ******* they *** *** ** the ***** ********* ***** available:

  • "****- *** ***'* **** it, *** ** **** as **'* * ****** or **** ** ** fairly ******."
  • "**** ** *****, **** and **** ** ***. Usually ***** **** ** readers, *** ******* ** codes."
  • "*** ***. **'* **** wired *** ***** ** program."

*******, **** ** ***** in ******** ******* ****: ***********, ********** ******** *** code '*****' ******* ** worn ** ***** ******* themselves *** ********* ******** to ******. ** * result, **** ***** *** integrators ******** ***** **** at ***.

Mobile ******* **********

******** ** ****, *** credential **** ********* **** often **** ***** ****** on ****** ******* ** smartphones. ** ***** ****** format *** ******* ** leader ***, **** **** integrators ****** ***** ***** or ****** *** ***** in *******:

  • "*** ** *** ********* in *** ********** *****. We're ******* ***** *** continued *********** ** ***** newer ********* **********."
  • "******** ****** **** ** also ******** **** ******* among *********."
  • "******* *** ****** *** - ****** ** * gamechanger."
  • "***** ***** *** *** HID's ****** ****** **** credentials ** ****** **** too."

Comments (7)

Anyone have any guess when biometrics are going to make a big move up for physical access control? They have certainly become much more common over the past few years in phones.

Biometrics already very popular in Kuwait. Many new installations ask for fingerprint at least.

What does many new installs mean specifically? 25%? 50% of new installs? Just fingerprint only or multi-modal?

Depends on the size of the project. For large installations where you have at least 10s of doors, you will have mostly card reads or multi-model (Fingerprint and card reader), so maybe 10-30% have fingerprint of some kind. At the other extreme, small business which have 5 or less readers almost always ask for fingerprint or multi-model.

Interesting. What is the justification that smaller systems/customers use when choosing biometrics over cards?

In general, it is typically more expensive to employ biometrics. Even inexpensive fingerprint readers cost hundreds ($400+) per reader/per door, while card readers cost ~$50 - $200 and cards cost ~$5 (or far less) each. For smaller systems to use biometrics, it likely tilts cost even more, so what is it that makes biometricS popular here?

I guess because when you are talking about a few fingerprint readers for an SMB (typically 1-3) for an office of up to 200 people, the overall cost for fingerprint readers is not that big compared to other security system elements (such as the CCTV system and the fire alarm), especially since you also don't need to use proximity cards.

In addition, a lot of what works on the SMB side of the market in Kuwait are the relatively cost Asian brands such as ZKteco.

Moreover, a lot of the standalone fingerprint readers also come with time and attendance features which are nice for SMB

In our office for example (where we have around 150 employees), we have a fingerprint reader with time attendance features (for all our staff) at the main entrance and a proximity reader just for the stores (with only two cards). Both are standalone and based on IDteck.

NIST has all but banned 125khz for Federal facilities, but the transition is slow and extremely painful. Out of the 50 or so Federal sites we maintain only 5 have made the move to 13.56 and full HSPD-12 compliance, but even those 5 opted not to use FICAM due to cost and complexity.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Maglocks Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 01, 2019
Maglocks divide access control specifiers perhaps more than any other component. Many are concerned about life safety codes, but others cite...
Directory of 60 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...

Most Recent Industry Reports

History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact