Exacq vs Avigilon

By: John Honovich, Published on Jun 17, 2015

A member requested:

"I need to find some IPVM info on Exacq vs. Avigilon. I don't have time to read 500 articles. Is there a short cut comparison as to which product integrator prefer and why. HELP??"

He's literally right. We have 389 entries on Avigilon and 189 on Exacq.

This post provides a 'short cut comparison'. It pulls most directly from the following core IPVM research and testing:

Inside, we cover (1) overall integrator preference, (2) camera offerings, (3) VMS offerings, (4) analytics, (5) support and (6) channel structure.

* ****** *********:

"* **** ** **** some **** **** ** Exacq **. ********. * don't **** **** ** read *** ********. ** there * ***** *** comparison ** ** ***** product ********** ****** *** why. ****??"

**'* ********* *****. ** have*** ******* ** ************** ** *****.

**** **** ******** * 'short *** **********'. ** pulls **** ******** **** the ********* **** **** research *** *******:

******, ** ***** (*) overall ********** **********, (*) camera *********, (*) *** offerings, (*) *********, (*) support *** (*) ******* structure.

[***************]

Overall ********** **********

**** ***** *** ***** the **** ******* *** widely **** ********* ** IPVM ********** *******. *** example, ***** ****** *** favorite *** **** ***** Avigilon ****** ** *** top **** *** *******, VMS *** ********* - the **** ************* ** do **. *** **** news ** **** *** probably **** ** ********* with ****** ***. *** bad **** ** **** choosing ******* **** ** not **** ******.

**** *** ***-****** ******, with ****** ********. ******* are ***** *** ***** low ***, ***** **** sensitive ************ *** ******* are ** ************* ** the **** *** ** Axis ** *******.

Camera *********

**** ********* ***** ***** own ******* *** ******* third-party *******. *******, ***** are ********* ***********.

******** *** * **** mature *** ******* ****** portfolio **** *****. ***** has * ****** ***** camera **** ******* **** / ********. *********** ********** ************* *******. ********'* cameras *** ***** ******* with **** ******** ******** and *******, **** ******* their ****** ********** (*** - ****) *** *****-****** options. ****: ** *** want *** *** *** up ******** *******, *** are ******** ** *** Avigilon's *** ***.

*****'* ******* *** ***** in *****, ***** *****'* more ***** **** ******* and *****'* ********* /**** *** ********* **********. ** ********, ******** requires * ******* ****** VMS ******* *** **** IP ****** *********.

Third ***** ****** *******

** *** ***** ***** camera ****, ***** ****** significantly ************* *** ***** ****** *********** than ********. ******** ********* depends ** ***** ***** integration, ***** ** *** as ******** *** **** as ********* ***********. **** are ******* * **********, though ***** *** ********* deeper ***** ************, ********** camera **** *** ** many ************* (********** ********* ********'* *** cameras).

VMS *********

**** ********* ***** ******* VMS ******** **** *** widely **** ** *** mid-market. ** ******* **** Avigilon's *** ** **** polished / ****** ** use **** *****, ****** both *** ********** ****** to ***. ***** *** opinions *** **** ****** based ** ******** ***********, we ****** ********* *** videos ** *** ******** *** **** *** ***** *** ****.

**** ********* ***** ******** appliances ****** ***** ****** a **** ******* *****, including ****** ****** ****. On *** ****** *********** side, ******** ****** * channel ******** ***** **** require * ****** ******** VMS ******* (******** **. ****** *** Recorders).

*********

******** *** * *********** lead ** ********* ** they ***** ***** *** leading ********* (**** *** VideoIQ ***********) ***** *** been *** ******** ********* among **** ********** ******* for ***** (*** ******** ***** ********* ****). ********'* ********* *** ******** to ********* **** *** party ***** (*********** ******** ******* ******) ** ** **** ** critical, **** ** * key ***** *** ********.

***** **** ********* **** ****** ** ***** ******** options. *******, ***** ************ most ***** ******* ***** to ******** ****** ****** integrations *** ******. **** is **** ******* **** Avigilon's **** *** **** integration **** ***** *******, and **** ***** *** find ** *********.

*******

********'* ********* ******* ** very ******. *****'* *** historically **** **** *** not ** ************ ** Avigilon's. ******** ******** **** ***** support ******* *** **** answer ********* *** ******** from ****** (**** **** for **** ******** ********** has ********** ******** ********* from ********* ******** **). The **** ****** ** Exacq ******* *** (*) delays ** ******* * hold ** * **** operator *** (*) ******* in ***** **** * more ****** ******* ****** who *** ****** ****** questions.

Channel *********

******** *** * **** tightly ********** ******* *********. With ********, ******* **** to ** ******** *** the ****** ** ******** per ********* ** ********** limited. ***** *********** ******** are ******** ** ******* business / *******. *********** *** are ********* ** ******* with ******** *** ***** very *****, ******* *********** is *******, ******** ******** strong ******* *** ****** Avigilon ****** ** *** quantity ** ********* *********. On *** ***** ****, if *** *** *** that *********, **** ***** be * ******* *** Avigilon ** *** *** about ******** ********** ***********.

*****'* ******* ** **** more ****. **** ** Exacq's ******** ** *** require * ****** ********* and **** ** *****'* products *** ** ****** online. **** ***** ** a *** ****** *** an ********** ** ***** Exacq ** ******** *** also ***** ** ****** to **** *********** *** matching.

***** *** **** ******** on *** ***** ********** side, ***** *** **** acquisition,****** ****** *** ** their *** ** ******* ******** **** ** selling *****-**-*** ****/***** ********. *** **** ******* Exacq ******* ** ** seen, *** ** ** pretty ***** **** **** are ****** ** ** more '*************' **** ******* integration *** *****-******* ** cameras *** *********.

*********

*** ** **** ** you **** ********* ** want ** ** ** address ***** ******** ** the **********. ** **** tried ** **** **** relatively ***** ** **** it ***** ********** *** are ***** ** *********.

Comments (13)

As far as you know - does Exacq manufacture their own cameras or are they OEM?

As far as we know, at least some of the lower end Exacq / Tyco / AD Illustra cameras are from Dahua.

Illustra PRO cameras (the new 3 and 5Mpx cameras, fisheye and PTZ cameras) are developed and produced by Tyco factories (most of them in DSC in Canada).

Very interesting and good article! thank you, John.

I am deep in using Avigilon (more than 20 servers and more than 250 cameras(most of them are analog and third party) in large teritory). several years ago I found this VMS. It was great discovery after using different DVRs with dificult and complicated management.

It all is true, what Avigilon VMS is polished and easier to use (as example very simple and comfortable record time line), great online support (often I'm not in time to install new online update with fixed issue. One update for all sites and hardware), tightly controlled channel structure, not strong hardware appliance (exactly 4 ch encoders are not strong side, but not cameras (cameras are strong product, but fairly expensive)).

What about third party cameras and DVRs, I discovered to conect to them through web page in Avigilon ACC view.

Questions:

1. It is interesting to compare Avigilon patented HDSM (network load between cameras, server and client sides), load of hardware (servers with conected more than 10, 20 cameras and client machines (processors, RAM, graphic, HDD and etc.)) with other brands. I am not sure, but I guess, what Avigilon is leader in this side.

2. Specially for me, it would be very interesting to read Avigilon vs Bosch article :).

Donatas,

Relevant to HDSM and remote monitoring, see: VMS Remote Monitoring Tested. Exacq supports multistreaming and transcoding which works quite well.

As for Avigilon, it depends on the version of HDSM. V1 is JPEG2000 and now is basically dead. V2 is multistreaming, similar to Exacq and many others. V3 is for HD Pro cameras only.

Can you cite any sources on HDSM V3? Avigilon's website indicates the following:

"

High Definition Stream Management 2.0

Until now, HDSM was most effective with the JPEG2000 compression standard. This was primarily due to the dynamic adaptability of the JPEG2000 compression standard with high-resolution imaging. While JPEG2000 provides coding flexibility and high imaging performance, it also produces higher average bitrate streams and less overall compression than H.264, and is not a widely used standard within the video security surveillance industry.

As a result, HDSM 2.0 was developed to operate with the H.264 compression standard, simultaneously providing users with high-resolution imaging performance, further bitrate reduction of H.264 and the intelligence and flexibility of HDSM. This technology pairing provides a unique and superior network performance over systems solely utilizing H.264 compression."

What Avigilon refers to as 'HDSM 2.0' is their 3rd implementation of HDSM. HDSM '1.0' is either (1) JPEG2000 or (2) multi-streaming, depending on the camera.

Relevant to HDSM and remote monitoring, see: VMS Remote Monitoring Tested. Exacq supports multistreaming and transcoding which works quite well.

To be clear Avigilon also supports transcoding.

As for Avigilon, it depends on the version of HDSM. V1 is JPEG2000 and now is basically dead. V2 is multistreaming, similar to Exacq and many others. V3 is for HD Pro cameras only.

The big difference between Exacq and Avigilon when it comes to multi streaming is Avigilon is completely automatic unlike Exacq (from what I remember) is manually configured for each camera. This makes Avigilon easier to deploy and use but Exacq has more control of the streams.

"Both are mid-market brands, with strong products. Neither are great for super low end, super cost sensitive applications and neither are as sophisticated in the high end as Axis or Genetec."

Can you offer some more clarification on what some of the key feature distinctions are between the mid-market options discussed here and the high-end options? What do the high-end options offer that I wouldn't get with Exacq or Avigilon?

Mid-market sounds a lot like Tier 2.

Just to clarify, I wasn't saying that Avigilon or Exacq was Tier 2, or any Tier in particular for that matter.

Instead I was pointing out that the segmenting term 'mid-market' seemed similar to the "Tier 2" of the unpublished Tier system from the other thread.

This remains to be an unsubstantiated claim if we're going to use the criteria outlined in the link provided as High-end/Tier 1:

"

Longer answer: being 'tier 1', i.e., in your description, 1,000+ cameras, typically requires supporting the following features:

  • Enterprise management
  • Health management
  • Deep third-party system integration (access, intrusion)
  • Rules for triggering actions / responses
  • Alarm / event management
  • Network video wall
  • Server / recorder redundancy or failover
  • Video analytics and LPR integration
  • Edge storage support
  • Well documented API / SDK
  • Sophistication / completeness of each of the above
  • Actual track record of in-production large scale systems to verify that this all really works"

My understanding of both Exacq and Avigilon is that they are fully capable of all the items John has identified as Tier 1, so my question remains, what's the difference? Maybe it's having an IP Horn that puts companies like Axis in High-end.

Easy now, undisclosed Avigilon RSM.

Ethan is working on 2 full posts, comparing Avigilon to Genetec and another on Avigilon to Axis. They are in queue and they will be published in the next few weeks.

But really, if you think that the only thing that distinguishes Axis from Avigilon is the IP horn, you are a moron.

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing...
Avigilon Open Analytics Tested on Apr 16, 2020
After years of effectively closed analytics, Avigilon decided in late 2018 to...
Vape Detection Legal Battle: Soter Sues IPVideo Corp on Jul 22, 2020
The crosstown vape detection rivals are now in a legal battle. While IPVideo...
Euklis Presents AI Analytics on May 05, 2020
Euklis presented its AI facial recognition, LPR, and object recognition...
Vivotek Presents AI Analytics and LPR on May 19, 2020
Vivotek presented its AI Analytics and LPR at the April 2020 IPVM New...
YOLOv5 Released Amidst Controversy on Jul 27, 2020
YOLO has gained significant attention within video surveillance for its...
Video Surveillance 101 Book Released on Jul 07, 2020
IPVM's unique introduction to video surveillance series is now available as a...
Favorite VSaaS Providers 2020 on Apr 17, 2020
VSaaS is starting to become mainstream but who are integrator's...
Video Analytics 101 on Mar 16, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance...
Uniview Deep Learning Camera Tested on Jul 14, 2020
Uniview's intrusion analytics have performed poorly in our shootouts. Now,...
Density Presents Occupancy Monitoring For Coronavirus Protection on May 22, 2020
Density presented its cloud-based occupancy sensor to deal with Coronavirus...
FDA Defines Correct Operation of "Fever Cameras" on May 26, 2020
The US FDA has now defined the correct operation of "Thermal Imaging...
Seek Scan Thermal Temperature Screening System Tested on May 28, 2020
Now that IPVM has tested Dahua, Hikvision, and Sunell, we are returning to...
VMS 101 on Mar 03, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals about video management...
AndroVideo Presents Edge AI Face Recognition Cameras on Jun 26, 2020
AndroVideo presented its AI at the edge face recognition cameras at the May...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...