San Francisco admits it asked and received a link for remote, real-time access but denies it ever clicked the link. However, an SFPD email suggests otherwise. Is San Francisco telling the truth or not?
However, the city ordinance allows using video surveillance under "exigent" circumstances. Would San Francisco, in the midst of rising crime, qualify for that?
In this report, IPVM examines the complaint, SFPD's response, and contradiction between the SFPD's position and email evidence.