New Product: Free Flow Turnstile (dFlow)

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on May 05, 2016

A new turnstile uses a totally different approach for access control than anything else on the market. Instead of unlocking to let people through, it slams closed on unauthorized users.

However, the developer says this approach is fundamentally better than traditional units and claims security is just as good, if not better. And it uses high-tech sensors to support those claims.

In this note, we look at Digicon's dFlow Turnstile, examine how it differs from typical units, and see if it really is the game-changer it claims to be.

* *** ********* **** * ******* ********* ******** *** ****** control **** ******** **** ** *** ******. ******* ** ********* to *** ****** *******, ** ***** ****** ** ************ *****.

*******, *** ********* **** **** ******** ** ************* ****** **** traditional ***** *** ****** ******** ** **** ** ****, ** not ******. *** ** **** ****-**** ******* ** ******* ***** claims.

** **** ****, ** **** *********'* ***** *********, ******* *** ** ******* **** ******* *****, *** *** if ** ****** ** *** ****-******* ** ****** ** **.

[***************]

The '**** ****' **********

*** **** ******* *********** ********** *** *** ***** ******* ********* is **** *** ******** *** ******** **** *** **** ***** when ** ************ ****** ******** ** **** ****:

*** ******* ***** ** **** ******** ** ******, ******* "*** vast ******** ** ***** **** ***** ****** ***********" *** ******* of ******* *** ******** ** ***** ***** ** ***** **** unlocking * *********, *** ********* ******* **** ***** ****** ** stop *** ******* ********.

**** ******** *** *** ********* **** ***** * **** ****** throughput, *** ******* ******* ** "******* ************ **** ** ** the **-** ***** *** ******, ************* ****** **** ******* ****/****** control *******" **** ******* **-** ***** *** ******.

Product ********

*** ************'* **** ***** ***** ***** *** ********* *** ******* performance ** *** ******, **** ***** ******* ********* **************** ********:

Key **********

***** ** ***** ** ** ********** **** ********** ******** **** traditional ***************** **********:

**** ******: ***** ** ********* ** ***** ***** **** *******. *** a **” **** ****, *** ******* ***** ***** ** ******* 0.4 *** *.* ***.

******** *****: ******* **** ******* ***** ** * ******** ** *** location, ***** *** ************ ** *** ************ **** ** *** gate. *** ******* ********* **** ** **:

** ** ************ **** ****** *** **** ******, *** ***** close ******. ** **** ***** *******, *** ***** ***** ******. By *** **** *****, ** **** **** ********* ******* *** gate ********, *** ***** **** **** ****** ** ****** ** they *****.

*********** ********: *** ***** *** **** ** * *********** *******, ******* the ****** ** ****** ** ***. *** ***** *** ******** with * ****** ****** ***** ****** *** ****** *****.

**** ***********: ***** **** ** ********* ***** ** ********* ** ******** access ******* *******, ***** ********** ** *******, ******, ****, ** Code *** ******. *** ********* *** ********* *** **-***, **** and ******** (***** ****), ** */* ******** *** ******* ***********.

**** ***** ********: *** **** ******** ****** *** *********** **** **** ***** systems, ** ******** *** **** **** *** **** ****** ****** emergencies.

*****

*** **** ***** ** ***** ** *** ** ****** ** $20,000. ******* ******* ** ******* ************* *** *** **** ***** a ****** **** ** ******** ** ***********. **** **** * single **** **** ****** ** * ****** *****.

Time ** ****** *****

** ***** ** ** ********** ** ******* *** ****** *** position *** ***** ** ***** ****** ******* *****, **** ******** adjacent ** **** *****, ***** **** * ***** **** ** detection ******: **** ** ******, ** ***.

**** ****** ** ******* ******** ******** ** *** *********, ** it *** ****** *** **** *********** ****** *** *********. ** asked ******* ** ********* ** **** ******** ******* ** *********** PIR ***** *******:

**** ** ******* ******* ** *** ******* ** **** **** (normally **** *****) ** ******** **** *** ******* ******** ********, point-to-point ** ******* *** *** **** *** ********* ********** ******** for ********* ******* **** ********. ** ** ******* ******* ** overhead ******* *** ******* ** * ** ******. *** ** part ** **** ****** ** *******. ***** *** ***** ******** users (********** ** ***) ****** *** ***** **** **** **** high *********.

***** *** ** *** ******* ** ***** ********** *** ** security, *** ********** *** **** ******* ** ******** *********. **** this****-********** ****** **** ***************'* ** **** ** ****** ******. ***** ******* ******** ** **** ********** ** ***** *** and ******* ********* ******** ** ***** ******/********* *******, *** ***** that *** ** * ****** ********** *** ********* ******** ********* is *******.

Company *******

********* * ********* ********* *** ********** **** ************ **** *** expanding **** ********* *******. *** *******'* ******* **** ******** ***** arm ********** (*******-********** *** *********) ** * ******* ** ******, full ****** ********** (****** *** ******) *** ********* *****. ***** dFlow ** *** ****** ********, *** ******* ******* ** ******** offering *********** ********* ********.

*** ******* ********* ***** ******* * ****** ******* ** *** users, ***** ** ** ******* ** ****** ****** ***** *******.

**************Access ******* ************

*****'* ************ ********* ******** ** **** ****** **** *** ** a *** ********** **********, **** ***** ******* **********, *** ******** used. ** ***** ** ******** ********, *** ***-****** ************ *** lightweight ******* ****** **** **** * ********** ************ **** *** simply *** **** ** ***** **** *** ******.

******, ***** *** ******** *** ******* ***** ** ****, ** high ******** ****** ***** ******* ** ********, * ************ ****-****** turnstile ** ******** **** **** ** ********.

*******, *** ***** ***** ***** *** *** *** *** **** population ** ********* ****-********* **** ****** *******, ***** ***** ***** a **** ********** ******* **********-***** *********** ** * *** **** few ***** ******** *** *******.

Comments (21)

Konstantin Avramenko

05/05/16 02:11pm

Since 1961 this type of turnstile has been used at the USSR subway stations

I posted the first video I found. This one is broken but it shows how it works.

This type of turnstiles worked well but it was dangerous and a bit scary )

Thumbnail pp 5

Brian Rhodes

IPVMU Certified | In reply to Konstantin Avramenko | 05/05/16 02:28pm

Holy cow, that thing looks like it could break legs.

I am curious how/why the turnbuckles close? A bad card/token read? Motion detectors?

Konstantin Avramenko

In reply to Brian Rhodes | 05/05/16 02:44pm

It was painful but usually it closed before you reached the point when it could hit you.

It worked with coins, then tokens, then cards. You can see holes from each side these are sensors. And this retro video shows the process.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Brian Rhodes | 05/05/16 09:43pm

Ask dFlow if their fancy Terahertz scanner can put a stop to such low-tech exploits such as the one at the 2 minute mark in the retro video, one that is clearly vulnerable to mixed-pair figure skaters.

Konstantin Avramenko

In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 05/05/16 10:58pm

I would try it how it handles these situations:

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Konstantin Avramenko | 05/06/16 01:27am

One of the Soviet innovations that came from the Space Race no doubt.

We got Tang, they got state-of-the-art access control.

And this is technology that wouldn't be duplicated for another 50 years.

Konstantin, can you explain how this was supposed to be an improvement, at least in theory, on just opening on authentication?

With the dFlow it makes sense, since you can have multiple people going thru with little gap between them, but here since everyone has to present auth of some sort, and the gap between the "reader" and the gate is large enough and the gate closes quick enough, there seems ample time to open for each person.

Plus, the time saved from the reauth runaround process would make it even faster, no?

Sure, it might save energy, but was that the main objective?

Konstantin Avramenko

In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 05/06/16 01:51am

Konstantin, can you explain how this was supposed to be an improvement, at least in theory, on just opening on authentication?

Did I say somewhere that it is an improvement? Personally I see no serious difference between them. In theory dFlow can have higher throughput but I doubt that in real life there will be significant difference.

From a user point of view I think that scheme: "stop - present credential - see gates opening - start moving" is better than "present credentials on the go - be stopped by gates -try to reach the reader through the people stacked behind you".

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Konstantin Avramenko | 05/06/16 03:49am

Did I say somewhere that it is an improvement?

Did I say somewhere you did? :)

But, I am actually wondering what the Soviets had in mind when they rolled this thing out. Was it intended to speed things up, save power, or just whack people in the crotch at random to keep 'em guessing?

Konstantin Avramenko

In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 05/06/16 04:09am

It was chosen from 32 projects in 1957 and I believe this choice was based on the level of technology at that time.

Now it depends on a country and city. This photo is from the Moscow subway.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Konstantin Avramenko | 05/06/16 04:38am

Why are they closed?

Konstantin Avramenko

In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 05/06/16 04:59am

Because it is a different type.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Konstantin Avramenko | 05/06/16 08:00am

Although looking vaguely Egyptian, this is yet another Russian turnstile innovation, though a bit lower-tech.

Apparently most fare jumpers are male...

Thumbnail scottpic

Scott Gerrels

IPVMU Certified | 05/05/16 05:42pm

I like this approach where life safety codes make it difficult to put in a traditional turnstile

Thumbnail image

Jon Dillabaugh

Pro Focus LLC | 05/05/16 10:45pm

As a man, I'm not comfortable with anything flying towards my nether regions.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Jon Dillabaugh | 05/06/16 12:51am

As a man, I'm not comfortable with anything flying towards my nether regions.

As Konstantin says above, it's only painful when it hits you.

As for the dFlow, it's an adaptive response based on real-time data from 3d sensors, so you should be fine. Anyway, if I'm not mistaken that board is sourced from the leader in the field, Johnson Controls, whose name speaks for itself.

Horace Lasell

05/06/16 12:32am

Eagerly looking forward to their Yosemite Sam trapdoor variant!

Thumbnail scottpic

Scott Gerrels

IPVMU Certified | 05/06/16 01:11am

Am I the only one who likes the potential in this approach? I have run into projects that life safety codes prohibited anything other than an optical approach rather than physical - this would probably work in that application.

Konstantin Avramenko

In reply to Scott Gerrels | 05/06/16 02:12am

Can you please clarify what difference from the point of life safety codes you see between this product and other turnstiles?

If it is Card In/Out then there has to be an emergency door (or alternative) because even dFlow wings are not closed they will close in front of a person without the right credential. If it is Card In only then again there is no difference between turnstiles because all of them will allow free egress.

Am I missing something?

Thumbnail pp 5

Brian Rhodes

IPVMU Certified | In reply to Konstantin Avramenko | 05/06/16 02:17am

dFlow has a fire-alarm override contact and can be used in 'card-in' configurations only.

Thumbnail scottpic

Scott Gerrels

IPVMU Certified | 05/06/16 03:38am

The turnstiles in the dflow videos I saw look like they are meant to keep people from entering unauthorized and allow free egress - they aren't even deployed until approached without authorization- wonder if you even need to deal with an override in this setup.

Konstantin Avramenko

In reply to Scott Gerrels | 05/06/16 03:47am

If your customer does not want "physical" then you can propose them something like this

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Access Control

19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
 Register for the Spring 2019 Access Control Course----Closed IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...
Spring 2019 50+ New Products Directory on Apr 08, 2019
We are compiling a list of new products for Spring 2019 and have over 50 already. Contrast to Fall 2018 New Products Directory and Spring 2018...
Startup GateKeeper Aims For Unified Physical / Logical Access Token on Apr 04, 2019
This startup's product claims to 'Kill the Password' you use to keep your computers safe.  They have already released their Gatekeeper Halberd...
Airship VMS Profile on Apr 03, 2019
Airship has been developing VMS software for over 10 years, however, with no outside investment, and minimal marketing, the company is not well...
Silicon Valley Access Startup Proxy Raises $13.6 Million on Mar 28, 2019
This mobile-credential based access startup just raised $13.6 million in funding.  Further, they claim that their technology can free businesses...

Most Recent Industry Reports

19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
 Register for the Spring 2019 Access Control Course----Closed IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact