Design-Build - A Better RFP Process?

Author: Ben Wood, Published on Aug 28, 2013

Almost everybody in the security industry has a horror story of a "low bid" system installation that has gone terribly wrong. Many city, county and state government entities are avoiding those pitfalls with a "design-build RFP" approach to procuring video surveillance and access control systems. In this note, we examine the reasons why, take a look inside the design-build process, its potential and pitfalls.

Why Design-Build?

* ****** ** *** ******* *****:

  • *** ***********: ******* ***** ************ *** ****** ******* ******* ****** *********** **** ********** *********** ****** *** **** ************ ** paper *****. *********, *** **** **** ** *** ******* ******* *** ********* *** those **** **** ** ***, ******, *** ******** ****. **** design-build, ***** ** *** *** **** *********** ****** *** *****.
  • **'* ****: ** *********** **** ** ******** **** **** **-***** ******** *******, many ***** ********** *** ******* ************** ** **** ** ******** the *** ** *** ******* ******* ** *** ******. **** want ** ****** *** ******* *** ****** *** ******** **********, **** sure **** **** *** ******* ** ******* ****, *** ******** any ********* ******* ************ *** ******** ****** ****** **** *** happen.
  • ******** ******** **** * **** ****** **** *** **** **** can ********* ***** ********** *** ***** **** * ******* ****** of ***** **** (** *******) ** ******** ** **********.
  • *** *********** *** ******* *** ** * ******* ******. **** times * ****** ************ ****** **** *** ** ** ******** system ***** ****, * ****** ***** **** **** *** ****, an ******** ******* *****, ** ******/***** ***** **** **** ** encumbered ******* ****** **** *** ****.
  • ********* ** **************** *** ******** ******* ******** ****** ** * ********** ******** to ******** ******** ****** ******** *** ************** *** *** ******, ***** can ** * ************ ******* ** **** *** *****, ********** if *** ******* ** ******* ** ***.  ** *** ******** is *** ****-****** ** ***** *******, *** ********** **** *** up ****** ** ******** ****. **** ******-***** *** ******** *** a ********* ****, ********* ** ****** **** *********, ******* ******* ******* ******** as ******, ******* * ****** *********** *** * ***** ************* of *** ****** *** **********.

Developing *** ******-***** ***

*** ******* ****** ** ********** * **** **** ****** *** ************ that ******** * ************** **** **** ********** **** **** ** involved **** *********, *****, ******** *** *********** *** ******. * city **** ******* ******** ******* **********,  ********'* ******, **********, **, security/police, ********** *** ***********. ** ****** ********, **** **** ******* ******** a ********** ******** ** * ********* **** **** * *** project **** **************** ** ******* * ******* ******, ******* ******* project ******** ** ******, ****** **** ********** ****** ********** *** produce ***********-***** **************. *** ********** ******** **** ***** ** ********* **** in *** ******** ****** *******, *** ********* **** *** **** a **** ** *** ********* *******.  

*** **** ******* *** ********** ** *** ***, ******* ********, the **********'* ****************, *** **************** **** ********** *** ** *** project's **************, *** ******** ******* ******** *** **********. *** ********** ********** ******** this **** * ******** *********** ******-***** *** ********. *** *** is ******* ****** **** **** ******** ******* *** ********* ********. Usually, *** ******* *** ********* ******** ** *** ******** *** weighted *********** (**. **/**), *** *** **** *** ********* *** they **** ** **********, ****** *** ***** *** ********* *** the criteria *** ******** ** *** ***.**** ** * **** ******* ** * ******-***** *** **** *** City ** *****, **.

The **** ******* ** * ******-***** ***

*** ********* ******* ********* ** * ******-***** *** *** **** but ****** **** *********** **** ** *** ********* *** ****:

  • ****** **** ****** * ********** ******** ***** * **** ****** ****** as **** * ******* ***, * ******-***** *** **** ******* the ****** **********, *********** ***************, *** ******* ******** *** ***** the **** ** *** ****** ************** ** ** *** *********.
  • ********, ** ********, *** *** ****** ** ************ ***** ********, usually ********** ** ***** ***** ** **** *** ******* ****** and ********* **** ********* ** ** ******** ***** ***** *** to ******* ****** ******* *** ***** ******* ****** ****** ** located.
  • **************, ** ********, *** ********* ****-******** **** ** *********** *** documents, ******** **** ** *********** *************** *** ******* ****** ******* ***** numbers ** * **** ** ********** *************.

Responding ** * ******-***** ***

********** ** ******-***** **** ** **** **** ******** **** * standard *** ******* ***** ** ******* * ***** ***** *** a ****** ** ***** *****. **** ** *** ****, **** constitutes * ******* *** ******** ***** ** **** **** ** the ******* ******* ** * ******-***** ********. * ******* ******-***** RFP ******** *** * ***** ******* ** * ***** ***********, ********* submitting multiple ****** ** * ****** **** ** *********** ** ****** sections ** ******** ** *** ***. 

*** *** ******* ** *** *** ******** ** *** ********* *********, this ** ***** *** ********** *********** ********* ***** ******** ** *** project, ****** ***** *************** *** ******** *** ********, *** ******** ** detail *** *** ****** ** **** ******** *** *******.  **** is ***** *** ********* ********* **** ***** ***** *********.  *** technical ****** *** *** ****-*******, ****** **** **** **** ******* approval, *** **** ******* ****'* *** ***** ******** ******. 

RFP ******** ***********

**** *** **** *********** *** *********** ** ******** **** ********* a ******-***** *** ********.

  • *** ********** ********* ** *** ****** ** ******* ******** ** the ********. ********* ******** **** ********** *** ***** ** **** as *** ***** ** ********* ********. ****'* ** ******* **** the ***** ***:

       

  • ******* ** "********* *******" ** **** **** *** **** ** the ***** ** *** ********* ********* ******* *** *** ***-********* ********* members ** *** ** ********. *** ********* ***** **** *** to **** **** *.
  • ** **** ******** ******* ** *** ********* *********. *** ** and ********* ****** **** *******, ********** **** ** ***** ** *** network, *** **'* ********. ****'* ** ******* ** **** *** bad ********* **** **** ******** ** *** ***** *** ******* the ***** ** ****** **** ******:

         

Proposal ****** *** *****

**** ****** *** ****** *** *** ***** ** *** **** are ****** *** *** *** ********* *** *********. **** *** vary *******, *** **** ** ** ******* ** *** **** of **** ****. **** ***** *** ******** ********, * ***** public ******* ***** ***** ***** *** ********* *** ******* *** * list of ********** ** *********, ** ******* ** ***** ******* *** revealed ** *********. ***** **** ****** *******, *** ********** ********** *** city ******** **** ****** **** ******** ** ****** **** ** contains *** ** *** ******** *********** *** ***** ************** *** met ** ****** ** *** ***. ** * ******** **** not ******* *** ******** ***********, ** *** ** ******* ** unresponsive *** ** ********.

*** ******** ******* *** **** **** ** *** ********* **********, a ********* ********* *** * ********* *********. **** *****, *** pricing **** ** ******* **** *** ******* ***** ** ************ to *** ********* ********* ** ** **** *** ********* *** review. *** ********* *********, ******* ********** ** *** ********** ******** *** IT *****, **** ****** *** ********* ****** ** **** ******** as ******** ** *** *** ************ *** ***** **** ** "Does *** ****", "**********" ** "*******".  *** ********* ********* **** present ***** ******** ** *** ********* *********, ** * ****** meeting ** ******** ** ***.  

*** ********* ********* ********* ******* ** *** ***-********* ***** ** the ******** **** ** *** *********'* **********, **********, *********/*******,*&********, ******* ********** *** ****** ****. ********* *** ********** ******* can ** *** ******* ** ***** ********, ** ****** **** a ******* *** ******** *** *******. *** ********* ********* ***** ** score *** ******* ***** ** *** ******** ** *** ***, tabulate *** ****** *** ***** *** *********.  **** ******* ***** ***** place ***** ***** *** *** ******** *** ****.**** ** ** ******* ** * ******* *** ******** *** a ******* ** *** **** ** **********, **.

**** ***** *** ********* **** *** ******* * ****** ** **** review *** ******* *******. ***** *****, **** **** "*****-****" *** three *******-****** ********* *** ******** * ************ *** ********* ******* where *** ********* *** * ****** ** ******** ******* ***** proposal *** ******* * ******* ************* ** ********* *** *** committee *** * ****** ** ********* *** ********* *** *** questions. **** ******-********'******** **** *****-**** ******. ***** *** ********* *******, *** ********* will **** ***** ********* **** *** *****-****** **********.

Why ********* *********** ****** ******-*****

**** ********* *********** ****** *** ******-***** ******** ** ** ****** them ** ******* **** * **** ******* ******** ******** *** *** just ** *****. **** *** ********* *** *** ******* *** shy **** **** **** *** ********. ******-***** **** ****** **** to ****** ********* **** **** *** ******** ** ********* ** as **** ** ***** ****** ********** **** **** ********** **. The ******-***** ****** ****** **** ** *** ********* *** ********, technical *** ******* * *********** ****** ** ***-***** ** ********, which ** * ****** **** ******* ********* ** *** ****.

Risks ** ******-*****

**** **** ********, *** ***** ** ******-***** *** ***** **** with **** *********** *** ********. *******, ***** *** *** ***'* that *** ******** ********** **** **** ******** **** **:

  • *** ******** ******** *** *** ************:** **'* * ******* ****** *******, *** ***** ****** *** requirements ** *** *** ** **** **** ********* **** **** experience ***** *** **********. ** *** ************* ** ******* (*** a *** *** ** *******), **** ***** *** *** ********* with ****-***** ********* *** ******* **** ** ******* ** ************ from ********* *** *** **** ** *** ******** ******. 
  • **** ********* ******:** *** ********** ******** *** ********* ****** ********* *** *** familiar ** ********* **** **********, ** ***** ************ ** ****** control *******, *** ********* ****** ** ******** ******** ***** *** lead ** * **** ****** ************ ** ********** *****.
  • **** ******* ******:** **********, ******* ********** ** ******* ********** *** *** ********** vetted *** ****** ******** ** *** ****** *******, ** *** lead ** * ********** ************ ********* ************ ** ********** ** the ************.
  • ******* * ******:** **** *** ******* *******, *** ******* *** ** **********. A **** ******-***** *** **** ***** ****** **** * ***** or **** *********. **** ***-********* *********, * **** ***** *** come **** ** ********** *** ****** ****** **** *** *******. A ******** *** ** *********** *********, *** * ********** ************ ** other ***** *** **** ** ***** ******.
  • ************: ******** *** *** ******* ********* * *** ** ************, if *****-**** ********** *** ********, ** *** **** **** ** who **** *** ******** ************ *** ********* **** ** *** Q&A.

Comments (5)

From my past experience Deisgn Build bids are code word for "we already have a design with someone we like and they will be awarded." We didn't see a lot of these but found out after the fact that there was already strong ties between the company bidding and the awardee. I agree in a perfect world it would be best but honesty is not prevalent in our society anymore and there are too many closed door deals.

Jason, Good feedback. One question: If they already had a design they wanted, why wouldn't they hard spec that design in such a way that favored / set up the bid to make their preferred person win?

I've seen that too as I'm sure we all have. I don't have a good answer for you though. Maybe they thought the Design Build process would be more resilient to anyone questioning the award? And it was not all of them, just a majority of them seemed to be like that. It was a difficult choice as well for any Integrator. Do you take the many hours it takes to put a good design build together knowing that one integrator has a good foot in the door or do you fold and move onto the next opportunity?

Jason - Any system can be manipulated by politics. In my integrator days there were a few design-build RFP's that I passed on (or should have passed on) for just such a reason. Usually if it's "grooved" for someone you can tell pretty easy by looking at any specification requirements in the RFP.

The representative form the company at the initial walkthrough that does not take notes is my suspect. He is usually a shadow to the future customer or is in the shadows at the back of the room not listening and not asking questions.

In the case of fire systems we have too often found the RFP is not code and would not pass firemarshal's inspection. We now have a dilemma. Do we bid according to specs as all other companies are expected to do and kill them with change orders? Do we notify the possible future customer about the deficiencies and request a correction to be put forth to all bidders? Do we expend hundreds of hours correcting the RFP and not get the bid? Do we pass on the bid? What would you do?

Our policy is to not spend the time repairing someone's specifications if it hits a percentage we have established, was not an accidental omission but intentionally specified to "go the cheap route" and or the customer is not immediately responsive.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Camera Focusing Tutorial on Aug 09, 2018
A camera's focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can cause important problems. In this guide, we explain focus issues and proper...
RealNetworks Free School Facial Recognition on Aug 03, 2018
The company that created RealPlayer is moving beyond media delivery and into the security space with a new facial recognition platform they have...
Camera Cable Whip Guide on Aug 03, 2018
Cable whips are one of integrator's least favorite camera features but seem to be unavoidable, now commonplace on dome, turret, and bullet cameras...
Installing Surveillance Cameras Into Synthetic Stucco (EIFS) Tutorial on Jul 30, 2018
Mounting cameras into synthetic stucco, commonly known as EIFS finishes, can be problematic If not properly planned, EIFS/stucco can be downright...
Door Swing Tutorial on Jul 24, 2018
The direction a door swings might seem minor, but it can greatly impact door hardware selection. There are four basic ways a door can swing, and...
Improved Security And Surveillance Bidding - 2018 MasterFormat Divisions Examined) on Jul 19, 2018
Navigating the world of system specifications and bidding work can be complex and confusing, but a standard format exists, and understanding it...
Ladder Lockdown and Ladder Levelizer Tested on Jul 18, 2018
Ladders are a daily necessity for surveillance and security installers, but working on an unstable surface can be extremely dangerous. In addition...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration is closed. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals.  Lots of network training...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Cut Milestone Licensing Costs 80% By Using Hikvision and Dahua NVRs (Tested) on Aug 13, 2018
Enterprise VMS licensing can be quite expensive, with $200 or more per channel common, meaning a 100 camera system can cost $20,000 in VMS...
Nortek Sues SDS, Battle Over Unpaid Bill and Cancelled Lines on Aug 13, 2018
Nortek and SDS legal battle continues. As IPVM reported, SDS sued Nortek alleging bribery and antitrust violation. However, Wave fired back at SDS,...
Uniview Intrusion Analytics and VMD Tested on Aug 13, 2018
IPVM's IP Camera Analytics Shootout featuring Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision created some ill will with a Uniview distributor who...
ADT Employees Protest ADT CEO on Aug 10, 2018
So many ADT employees were so upset with ADT's CEO speech reported on by IPVM, that ADT's CEO was forced to send a mass email to employees to...
Axis / Avigilon Legal Battle Rises on Aug 09, 2018
In what is shaping up to be high-powered, will-not-back-down battle, Axis and Avigilon are squaring off in multiple legal contests. In 2017, IPVM...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Aug 09, 2018
A camera's focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can cause important problems. In this guide, we explain focus issues and proper...
Dahua Ban Response: NOT Chinese Government Owned on Aug 08, 2018
Dahua has responded to the US Congress passing a US government ban on Dahua and Hikvision's products. While Dahua offered the now standard...
Bad Move: ADT Markets Rival Amazon on Aug 08, 2018
Amazon may be lining up ADT as its next victim but ADT is happy to promote Amazon. Amazon has made major moves recently, including acquiring...
Hikvision PanoVu Mini Tested (Multi-imager + PTZ For ~$500) on Aug 07, 2018
Hikvision has released their first PanoVu Mini multi imager, the PanoVu DS-2PT3326IZ-DE3, with four 1080p imagers, including a PTZ and integrated...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact