Design-Build - A Better RFP Process?

Author: Ben Wood, Published on Aug 28, 2013

Almost everybody in the security industry has a horror story of a "low bid" system installation that has gone terribly wrong. Many city, county and state government entities are avoiding those pitfalls with a "design-build RFP" approach to procuring video surveillance and access control systems. In this note, we examine the reasons why, take a look inside the design-build process, its potential and pitfalls.

Why Design-Build?

* ****** ** *** ******* *****:

  • *** ***********: ******* ***** ************ *** ****** ******* ******* ****** *********** **** ********** *********** ****** *** **** ************ ** paper *****. *********, *** **** **** ** *** ******* ******* *** ********* *** those **** **** ** ***, ******, *** ******** ****. **** design-build, ***** ** *** *** **** *********** ****** *** *****.
  • **'* ****: ** *********** **** ** ******** **** **** **-***** ******** *******, many ***** ********** *** ******* ************** ** **** ** ******** the *** ** *** ******* ******* ** *** ******. **** want ** ****** *** ******* *** ****** *** ******** **********, **** sure **** **** *** ******* ** ******* ****, *** ******** any ********* ******* ************ *** ******** ****** ****** **** *** happen.
  • ******** ******** **** * **** ****** **** *** **** **** can ********* ***** ********** *** ***** **** * ******* ****** of ***** **** (** *******) ** ******** ** **********.
  • *** *********** *** ******* *** ** * ******* ******. **** times * ****** ************ ****** **** *** ** ** ******** system ***** ****, * ****** ***** **** **** *** ****, an ******** ******* *****, ** ******/***** ***** **** **** ** encumbered ******* ****** **** *** ****.
  • ********* ** **************** *** ******** ******* ******** ****** ** * ********** ******** to ******** ******** ****** ******** *** ************** *** *** ******, ***** can ** * ************ ******* ** **** *** *****, ********** if *** ******* ** ******* ** ***.  ** *** ******** is *** ****-****** ** ***** *******, *** ********** **** *** up ****** ** ******** ****. **** ******-***** *** ******** *** a ********* ****, ********* ** ****** **** *********, ******* ******* ******* ******** as ******, ******* * ****** *********** *** * ***** ************* of *** ****** *** **********.

Developing *** ******-***** ***

*** ******* ****** ** ********** * **** **** ****** *** ************ that ******** * ************** **** **** ********** **** **** ** involved **** *********, *****, ******** *** *********** *** ******. * city **** ******* ******** ******* **********,  ********'* ******, **********, **, security/police, ********** *** ***********. ** ****** ********, **** **** ******* ******** a ********** ******** ** * ********* **** **** * *** project **** **************** ** ******* * ******* ******, ******* ******* project ******** ** ******, ****** **** ********** ****** ********** *** produce ***********-***** **************. *** ********** ******** **** ***** ** ********* **** in *** ******** ****** *******, *** ********* **** *** **** a **** ** *** ********* *******.  

*** **** ******* *** ********** ** *** ***, ******* ********, the **********'* ****************, *** **************** **** ********** *** ** *** project's **************, *** ******** ******* ******** *** **********. *** ********** ********** ******** this **** * ******** *********** ******-***** *** ********. *** *** is ******* ****** **** **** ******** ******* *** ********* ********. Usually, *** ******* *** ********* ******** ** *** ******** *** weighted *********** (**. **/**), *** *** **** *** ********* *** they **** ** **********, ****** *** ***** *** ********* *** the criteria *** ******** ** *** ***.**** ** * **** ******* ** * ******-***** *** **** *** City ** *****, **.

The **** ******* ** * ******-***** ***

*** ********* ******* ********* ** * ******-***** *** *** **** but ****** **** *********** **** ** *** ********* *** ****:

  • ****** **** ****** * ********** ******** ***** * **** ****** ****** as **** * ******* ***, * ******-***** *** **** ******* the ****** **********, *********** ***************, *** ******* ******** *** ***** the **** ** *** ****** ************** ** ** *** *********.
  • ********, ** ********, *** *** ****** ** ************ ***** ********, usually ********** ** ***** ***** ** **** *** ******* ****** and ********* **** ********* ** ** ******** ***** ***** *** to ******* ****** ******* *** ***** ******* ****** ****** ** located.
  • **************, ** ********, *** ********* ****-******** **** ** *********** *** documents, ******** **** ** *********** *************** *** ******* ****** ******* ***** numbers ** * **** ** ********** *************.

Responding ** * ******-***** ***

********** ** ******-***** **** ** **** **** ******** **** * standard *** ******* ***** ** ******* * ***** ***** *** a ****** ** ***** *****. **** ** *** ****, **** constitutes * ******* *** ******** ***** ** **** **** ** the ******* ******* ** * ******-***** ********. * ******* ******-***** RFP ******** *** * ***** ******* ** * ***** ***********, ********* submitting multiple ****** ** * ****** **** ** *********** ** ****** sections ** ******** ** *** ***. 

*** *** ******* ** *** *** ******** ** *** ********* *********, this ** ***** *** ********** *********** ********* ***** ******** ** *** project, ****** ***** *************** *** ******** *** ********, *** ******** ** detail *** *** ****** ** **** ******** *** *******.  **** is ***** *** ********* ********* **** ***** ***** *********.  *** technical ****** *** *** ****-*******, ****** **** **** **** ******* approval, *** **** ******* ****'* *** ***** ******** ******. 

RFP ******** ***********

**** *** **** *********** *** *********** ** ******** **** ********* a ******-***** *** ********.

  • *** ********** ********* ** *** ****** ** ******* ******** ** the ********. ********* ******** **** ********** *** ***** ** **** as *** ***** ** ********* ********. ****'* ** ******* **** the ***** ***:

       

  • ******* ** "********* *******" ** **** **** *** **** ** the ***** ** *** ********* ********* ******* *** *** ***-********* ********* members ** *** ** ********. *** ********* ***** **** *** to **** **** *.
  • ** **** ******** ******* ** *** ********* *********. *** ** and ********* ****** **** *******, ********** **** ** ***** ** *** network, *** **'* ********. ****'* ** ******* ** **** *** bad ********* **** **** ******** ** *** ***** *** ******* the ***** ** ****** **** ******:

         

Proposal ****** *** *****

**** ****** *** ****** *** *** ***** ** *** **** are ****** *** *** *** ********* *** *********. **** *** vary *******, *** **** ** ** ******* ** *** **** of **** ****. **** ***** *** ******** ********, * ***** public ******* ***** ***** ***** *** ********* *** ******* *** * list of ********** ** *********, ** ******* ** ***** ******* *** revealed ** *********. ***** **** ****** *******, *** ********** ********** *** city ******** **** ****** **** ******** ** ****** **** ** contains *** ** *** ******** *********** *** ***** ************** *** met ** ****** ** *** ***. ** * ******** **** not ******* *** ******** ***********, ** *** ** ******* ** unresponsive *** ** ********.

*** ******** ******* *** **** **** ** *** ********* **********, a ********* ********* *** * ********* *********. **** *****, *** pricing **** ** ******* **** *** ******* ***** ** ************ to *** ********* ********* ** ** **** *** ********* *** review. *** ********* *********, ******* ********** ** *** ********** ******** *** IT *****, **** ****** *** ********* ****** ** **** ******** as ******** ** *** *** ************ *** ***** **** ** "Does *** ****", "**********" ** "*******".  *** ********* ********* **** present ***** ******** ** *** ********* *********, ** * ****** meeting ** ******** ** ***.  

*** ********* ********* ********* ******* ** *** ***-********* ***** ** the ******** **** ** *** *********'* **********, **********, *********/*******,*&********, ******* ********** *** ****** ****. ********* *** ********** ******* can ** *** ******* ** ***** ********, ** ****** **** a ******* *** ******** *** *******. *** ********* ********* ***** ** score *** ******* ***** ** *** ******** ** *** ***, tabulate *** ****** *** ***** *** *********.  **** ******* ***** ***** place ***** ***** *** *** ******** *** ****.**** ** ** ******* ** * ******* *** ******** *** a ******* ** *** **** ** **********, **.

**** ***** *** ********* **** *** ******* * ****** ** **** review *** ******* *******. ***** *****, **** **** "*****-****" *** three *******-****** ********* *** ******** * ************ *** ********* ******* where *** ********* *** * ****** ** ******** ******* ***** proposal *** ******* * ******* ************* ** ********* *** *** committee *** * ****** ** ********* *** ********* *** *** questions. **** ******-********'******** **** *****-**** ******. ***** *** ********* *******, *** ********* will **** ***** ********* **** *** *****-****** **********.

Why ********* *********** ****** ******-*****

**** ********* *********** ****** *** ******-***** ******** ** ** ****** them ** ******* **** * **** ******* ******** ******** *** *** just ** *****. **** *** ********* *** *** ******* *** shy **** **** **** *** ********. ******-***** **** ****** **** to ****** ********* **** **** *** ******** ** ********* ** as **** ** ***** ****** ********** **** **** ********** **. The ******-***** ****** ****** **** ** *** ********* *** ********, technical *** ******* * *********** ****** ** ***-***** ** ********, which ** * ****** **** ******* ********* ** *** ****.

Risks ** ******-*****

**** **** ********, *** ***** ** ******-***** *** ***** **** with **** *********** *** ********. *******, ***** *** *** ***'* that *** ******** ********** **** **** ******** **** **:

  • *** ******** ******** *** *** ************:** **'* * ******* ****** *******, *** ***** ****** *** requirements ** *** *** ** **** **** ********* **** **** experience ***** *** **********. ** *** ************* ** ******* (*** a *** *** ** *******), **** ***** *** *** ********* with ****-***** ********* *** ******* **** ** ******* ** ************ from ********* *** *** **** ** *** ******** ******. 
  • **** ********* ******:** *** ********** ******** *** ********* ****** ********* *** *** familiar ** ********* **** **********, ** ***** ************ ** ****** control *******, *** ********* ****** ** ******** ******** ***** *** lead ** * **** ****** ************ ** ********** *****.
  • **** ******* ******:** **********, ******* ********** ** ******* ********** *** *** ********** vetted *** ****** ******** ** *** ****** *******, ** *** lead ** * ********** ************ ********* ************ ** ********** ** the ************.
  • ******* * ******:** **** *** ******* *******, *** ******* *** ** **********. A **** ******-***** *** **** ***** ****** **** * ***** or **** *********. **** ***-********* *********, * **** ***** *** come **** ** ********** *** ****** ****** **** *** *******. A ******** *** ** *********** *********, *** * ********** ************ ** other ***** *** **** ** ***** ******.
  • ************: ******** *** *** ******* ********* * *** ** ************, if *****-**** ********** *** ********, ** *** **** **** ** who **** *** ******** ************ *** ********* **** ** *** Q&A.

Comments (5)

From my past experience Deisgn Build bids are code word for "we already have a design with someone we like and they will be awarded." We didn't see a lot of these but found out after the fact that there was already strong ties between the company bidding and the awardee. I agree in a perfect world it would be best but honesty is not prevalent in our society anymore and there are too many closed door deals.

Jason, Good feedback. One question: If they already had a design they wanted, why wouldn't they hard spec that design in such a way that favored / set up the bid to make their preferred person win?

I've seen that too as I'm sure we all have. I don't have a good answer for you though. Maybe they thought the Design Build process would be more resilient to anyone questioning the award? And it was not all of them, just a majority of them seemed to be like that. It was a difficult choice as well for any Integrator. Do you take the many hours it takes to put a good design build together knowing that one integrator has a good foot in the door or do you fold and move onto the next opportunity?

Jason - Any system can be manipulated by politics. In my integrator days there were a few design-build RFP's that I passed on (or should have passed on) for just such a reason. Usually if it's "grooved" for someone you can tell pretty easy by looking at any specification requirements in the RFP.

The representative form the company at the initial walkthrough that does not take notes is my suspect. He is usually a shadow to the future customer or is in the shadows at the back of the room not listening and not asking questions.

In the case of fire systems we have too often found the RFP is not code and would not pass firemarshal's inspection. We now have a dilemma. Do we bid according to specs as all other companies are expected to do and kill them with change orders? Do we notify the possible future customer about the deficiencies and request a correction to be put forth to all bidders? Do we expend hundreds of hours correcting the RFP and not get the bid? Do we pass on the bid? What would you do?

Our policy is to not spend the time repairing someone's specifications if it hits a percentage we have established, was not an accidental omission but intentionally specified to "go the cheap route" and or the customer is not immediately responsive.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...
Uniview / UNV Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 12, 2019
Uniview / UNV, the self-proclaimed #3 China manufacturer, while starting late, has been working to make inroads internationally. In IPVM's 2019...
Nortek Mobile Access Reader BluePass Examined on Feb 12, 2019
Nortek's Linear access control division claims to make mobile credentials "more secure and easier to use than ever before" with their BluePass...
Barnes Buchanan 2019: Despite 'Strange Narrative' Great Time To Be In Security on Feb 11, 2019
A "strange narrative" is being spun, said Michael Barnes at the 2019 Barnes Buchanan Conference. However, despite that narrative, it is a "great...
FLIR Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 08, 2019
FLIR has had a challenging past few years including FLIR Security business struggling, FLIR restructuring their security division and FLIR selling...
Sony Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 06, 2019
Sony Favorability amongst integrators improved moderately compared to their 2017 favorability results, with a modest net positive...
HID Launches Origo To Fix Mobile Credential Problems on Feb 05, 2019
HID is releasing Origo, an overhaul of its mobile credential platform, this time drastically restructuring the way it is priced and packaged. HID's...
Hanwha Techwin Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 31, 2019
Hanwha Techwin's favorability results surged, in IPVM's 2019 study, going from barely neutral in 2016 to strongly net positive, as the results...
Designing Access Control Guide on Jan 30, 2019
Designing an access control solution requires decisions on 8 fundamental questions. This in-depth guide helps you understand the options and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Sales Cuts At Rasilient on Feb 19, 2019
Over the past 2 years, video surveillance storage specialist Rasilient has expanded its workforce significantly, aiming to build its own branded...
Exacq Raises VMS Software Pricing Twice in Less Than a Year on Feb 18, 2019
Most VMSes regularly release new features, but rarely increase their prices. For the 3rd time in 4 years, and 2nd time in 8 months, since being...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...
Casino Surveillance Pro Interview: James Lathrop on Feb 15, 2019
James Lathrop has been working in casinos for almost 25 years. During that time, he says he has held "just about every job you can do in the...
Hikvision 2018 Revenue Tops $7 Billion USD But Growth Slows To Low on Feb 15, 2019
Hikvision's annual revenue topped $7 billion for the first time in 2018, although growth slowed sharply. In this post, we analyze the latest...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
ADT And 'The Defenders' Silent About Massive Complaints on Feb 14, 2019
ADT's largest dealer, "The Defenders" has been the subject of a massive number of complaints over many years and many forums, most recently a CBS...
Hikvision Chairman Praises United Front on Feb 14, 2019
Hikvision’s controlling shareholder held a meeting last month praising the United Front, a Communist Party organization known for its secretive...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact