Design-Build - A Better RFP Process?

Author: Ben Wood, Published on Aug 28, 2013

Almost everybody in the security industry has a horror story of a "low bid" system installation that has gone terribly wrong. Many city, county and state government entities are avoiding those pitfalls with a "design-build RFP" approach to procuring video surveillance and access control systems. In this note, we examine the reasons why, take a look inside the design-build process, its potential and pitfalls.

Why Design-Build?

* ****** ** *** ******* *****:

  • *** ***********: ******* ***** ************ *** ****** ******* ******* ****** *********** **** ********** *********** ****** *** **** ************ ** paper *****. *********, *** **** **** ** *** ******* ******* *** ********* *** those **** **** ** ***, ******, *** ******** ****. **** design-build, ***** ** *** *** **** *********** ****** *** *****.
  • **'* ****: ** *********** **** ** ******** **** **** **-***** ******** *******, many ***** ********** *** ******* ************** ** **** ** ******** the *** ** *** ******* ******* ** *** ******. **** want ** ****** *** ******* *** ****** *** ******** **********, **** sure **** **** *** ******* ** ******* ****, *** ******** any ********* ******* ************ *** ******** ****** ****** **** *** happen.
  • ******** ******** **** * **** ****** **** *** **** **** can ********* ***** ********** *** ***** **** * ******* ****** of ***** **** (** *******) ** ******** ** **********.
  • *** *********** *** ******* *** ** * ******* ******. **** times * ****** ************ ****** **** *** ** ** ******** system ***** ****, * ****** ***** **** **** *** ****, an ******** ******* *****, ** ******/***** ***** **** **** ** encumbered ******* ****** **** *** ****.
  • ********* ** **************** *** ******** ******* ******** ****** ** * ********** ******** to ******** ******** ****** ******** *** ************** *** *** ******, ***** can ** * ************ ******* ** **** *** *****, ********** if *** ******* ** ******* ** ***.  ** *** ******** is *** ****-****** ** ***** *******, *** ********** **** *** up ****** ** ******** ****. **** ******-***** *** ******** *** a ********* ****, ********* ** ****** **** *********, ******* ******* ******* ******** as ******, ******* * ****** *********** *** * ***** ************* of *** ****** *** **********.

Developing *** ******-***** ***

*** ******* ****** ** ********** * **** **** ****** *** ************ that ******** * ************** **** **** ********** **** **** ** involved **** *********, *****, ******** *** *********** *** ******. * city **** ******* ******** ******* **********,  ********'* ******, **********, **, security/police, ********** *** ***********. ** ****** ********, **** **** ******* ******** a ********** ******** ** * ********* **** **** * *** project **** **************** ** ******* * ******* ******, ******* ******* project ******** ** ******, ****** **** ********** ****** ********** *** produce ***********-***** **************. *** ********** ******** **** ***** ** ********* **** in *** ******** ****** *******, *** ********* **** *** **** a **** ** *** ********* *******.  

*** **** ******* *** ********** ** *** ***, ******* ********, the **********'* ****************, *** **************** **** ********** *** ** *** project's **************, *** ******** ******* ******** *** **********. *** ********** ********** ******** this **** * ******** *********** ******-***** *** ********. *** *** is ******* ****** **** **** ******** ******* *** ********* ********. Usually, *** ******* *** ********* ******** ** *** ******** *** weighted *********** (**. **/**), *** *** **** *** ********* *** they **** ** **********, ****** *** ***** *** ********* *** the criteria *** ******** ** *** ***.**** ** * **** ******* ** * ******-***** *** **** *** City ** *****, **.

The **** ******* ** * ******-***** ***

*** ********* ******* ********* ** * ******-***** *** *** **** but ****** **** *********** **** ** *** ********* *** ****:

  • ****** **** ****** * ********** ******** ***** * **** ****** ****** as **** * ******* ***, * ******-***** *** **** ******* the ****** **********, *********** ***************, *** ******* ******** *** ***** the **** ** *** ****** ************** ** ** *** *********.
  • ********, ** ********, *** *** ****** ** ************ ***** ********, usually ********** ** ***** ***** ** **** *** ******* ****** and ********* **** ********* ** ** ******** ***** ***** *** to ******* ****** ******* *** ***** ******* ****** ****** ** located.
  • **************, ** ********, *** ********* ****-******** **** ** *********** *** documents, ******** **** ** *********** *************** *** ******* ****** ******* ***** numbers ** * **** ** ********** *************.

Responding ** * ******-***** ***

********** ** ******-***** **** ** **** **** ******** **** * standard *** ******* ***** ** ******* * ***** ***** *** a ****** ** ***** *****. **** ** *** ****, **** constitutes * ******* *** ******** ***** ** **** **** ** the ******* ******* ** * ******-***** ********. * ******* ******-***** RFP ******** *** * ***** ******* ** * ***** ***********, ********* submitting multiple ****** ** * ****** **** ** *********** ** ****** sections ** ******** ** *** ***. 

*** *** ******* ** *** *** ******** ** *** ********* *********, this ** ***** *** ********** *********** ********* ***** ******** ** *** project, ****** ***** *************** *** ******** *** ********, *** ******** ** detail *** *** ****** ** **** ******** *** *******.  **** is ***** *** ********* ********* **** ***** ***** *********.  *** technical ****** *** *** ****-*******, ****** **** **** **** ******* approval, *** **** ******* ****'* *** ***** ******** ******. 

RFP ******** ***********

**** *** **** *********** *** *********** ** ******** **** ********* a ******-***** *** ********.

  • *** ********** ********* ** *** ****** ** ******* ******** ** the ********. ********* ******** **** ********** *** ***** ** **** as *** ***** ** ********* ********. ****'* ** ******* **** the ***** ***:

       

  • ******* ** "********* *******" ** **** **** *** **** ** the ***** ** *** ********* ********* ******* *** *** ***-********* ********* members ** *** ** ********. *** ********* ***** **** *** to **** **** *.
  • ** **** ******** ******* ** *** ********* *********. *** ** and ********* ****** **** *******, ********** **** ** ***** ** *** network, *** **'* ********. ****'* ** ******* ** **** *** bad ********* **** **** ******** ** *** ***** *** ******* the ***** ** ****** **** ******:

         

Proposal ****** *** *****

**** ****** *** ****** *** *** ***** ** *** **** are ****** *** *** *** ********* *** *********. **** *** vary *******, *** **** ** ** ******* ** *** **** of **** ****. **** ***** *** ******** ********, * ***** public ******* ***** ***** ***** *** ********* *** ******* *** * list of ********** ** *********, ** ******* ** ***** ******* *** revealed ** *********. ***** **** ****** *******, *** ********** ********** *** city ******** **** ****** **** ******** ** ****** **** ** contains *** ** *** ******** *********** *** ***** ************** *** met ** ****** ** *** ***. ** * ******** **** not ******* *** ******** ***********, ** *** ** ******* ** unresponsive *** ** ********.

*** ******** ******* *** **** **** ** *** ********* **********, a ********* ********* *** * ********* *********. **** *****, *** pricing **** ** ******* **** *** ******* ***** ** ************ to *** ********* ********* ** ** **** *** ********* *** review. *** ********* *********, ******* ********** ** *** ********** ******** *** IT *****, **** ****** *** ********* ****** ** **** ******** as ******** ** *** *** ************ *** ***** **** ** "Does *** ****", "**********" ** "*******".  *** ********* ********* **** present ***** ******** ** *** ********* *********, ** * ****** meeting ** ******** ** ***.  

*** ********* ********* ********* ******* ** *** ***-********* ***** ** the ******** **** ** *** *********'* **********, **********, *********/*******,*&********, ******* ********** *** ****** ****. ********* *** ********** ******* can ** *** ******* ** ***** ********, ** ****** **** a ******* *** ******** *** *******. *** ********* ********* ***** ** score *** ******* ***** ** *** ******** ** *** ***, tabulate *** ****** *** ***** *** *********.  **** ******* ***** ***** place ***** ***** *** *** ******** *** ****.**** ** ** ******* ** * ******* *** ******** *** a ******* ** *** **** ** **********, **.

**** ***** *** ********* **** *** ******* * ****** ** **** review *** ******* *******. ***** *****, **** **** "*****-****" *** three *******-****** ********* *** ******** * ************ *** ********* ******* where *** ********* *** * ****** ** ******** ******* ***** proposal *** ******* * ******* ************* ** ********* *** *** committee *** * ****** ** ********* *** ********* *** *** questions. **** ******-********'******** **** *****-**** ******. ***** *** ********* *******, *** ********* will **** ***** ********* **** *** *****-****** **********.

Why ********* *********** ****** ******-*****

**** ********* *********** ****** *** ******-***** ******** ** ** ****** them ** ******* **** * **** ******* ******** ******** *** *** just ** *****. **** *** ********* *** *** ******* *** shy **** **** **** *** ********. ******-***** **** ****** **** to ****** ********* **** **** *** ******** ** ********* ** as **** ** ***** ****** ********** **** **** ********** **. The ******-***** ****** ****** **** ** *** ********* *** ********, technical *** ******* * *********** ****** ** ***-***** ** ********, which ** * ****** **** ******* ********* ** *** ****.

Risks ** ******-*****

**** **** ********, *** ***** ** ******-***** *** ***** **** with **** *********** *** ********. *******, ***** *** *** ***'* that *** ******** ********** **** **** ******** **** **:

  • *** ******** ******** *** *** ************:** **'* * ******* ****** *******, *** ***** ****** *** requirements ** *** *** ** **** **** ********* **** **** experience ***** *** **********. ** *** ************* ** ******* (*** a *** *** ** *******), **** ***** *** *** ********* with ****-***** ********* *** ******* **** ** ******* ** ************ from ********* *** *** **** ** *** ******** ******. 
  • **** ********* ******:** *** ********** ******** *** ********* ****** ********* *** *** familiar ** ********* **** **********, ** ***** ************ ** ****** control *******, *** ********* ****** ** ******** ******** ***** *** lead ** * **** ****** ************ ** ********** *****.
  • **** ******* ******:** **********, ******* ********** ** ******* ********** *** *** ********** vetted *** ****** ******** ** *** ****** *******, ** *** lead ** * ********** ************ ********* ************ ** ********** ** the ************.
  • ******* * ******:** **** *** ******* *******, *** ******* *** ** **********. A **** ******-***** *** **** ***** ****** **** * ***** or **** *********. **** ***-********* *********, * **** ***** *** come **** ** ********** *** ****** ****** **** *** *******. A ******** *** ** *********** *********, *** * ********** ************ ** other ***** *** **** ** ***** ******.
  • ************: ******** *** *** ******* ********* * *** ** ************, if *****-**** ********** *** ********, ** *** **** **** ** who **** *** ******** ************ *** ********* **** ** *** Q&A.

Comments (5)

From my past experience Deisgn Build bids are code word for "we already have a design with someone we like and they will be awarded." We didn't see a lot of these but found out after the fact that there was already strong ties between the company bidding and the awardee. I agree in a perfect world it would be best but honesty is not prevalent in our society anymore and there are too many closed door deals.

Jason, Good feedback. One question: If they already had a design they wanted, why wouldn't they hard spec that design in such a way that favored / set up the bid to make their preferred person win?

I've seen that too as I'm sure we all have. I don't have a good answer for you though. Maybe they thought the Design Build process would be more resilient to anyone questioning the award? And it was not all of them, just a majority of them seemed to be like that. It was a difficult choice as well for any Integrator. Do you take the many hours it takes to put a good design build together knowing that one integrator has a good foot in the door or do you fold and move onto the next opportunity?

Jason - Any system can be manipulated by politics. In my integrator days there were a few design-build RFP's that I passed on (or should have passed on) for just such a reason. Usually if it's "grooved" for someone you can tell pretty easy by looking at any specification requirements in the RFP.

The representative form the company at the initial walkthrough that does not take notes is my suspect. He is usually a shadow to the future customer or is in the shadows at the back of the room not listening and not asking questions.

In the case of fire systems we have too often found the RFP is not code and would not pass firemarshal's inspection. We now have a dilemma. Do we bid according to specs as all other companies are expected to do and kill them with change orders? Do we notify the possible future customer about the deficiencies and request a correction to be put forth to all bidders? Do we expend hundreds of hours correcting the RFP and not get the bid? Do we pass on the bid? What would you do?

Our policy is to not spend the time repairing someone's specifications if it hits a percentage we have established, was not an accidental omission but intentionally specified to "go the cheap route" and or the customer is not immediately responsive.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 19, 2018
The last chance to save $50 on registration is this Thursday, June 21st. Register now and save. This is the only networking course designed...
The Dumb Ones: PSA's Bozeman On Cybersecurity on Jun 15, 2018
The smart ones are the hundred people who flew to Denver and spent $500+ on a 1.5-day conference featuring Dahua as a 'cyber responsible partner',...
Axis Releases First New Access Controller In 5 Years (A1601) on Jun 15, 2018
It has been 5 years since Axis 2013 entry in the physical access control market, with the A1001 (IPVM test). Now, Axis has released its second...
Four Major Outdoor Camera Install Problems on Jun 14, 2018
Over 140 integrators told us the top four camera installation mistakes that lead to unexpected problems and failures. Their comments often...
Access Control - Time & Attendance, Mustering and Mantraps Guide on Jun 13, 2018
Electronic access offers features that traditional mechanical locks cannot. While these features may not be as fundamental as keeping doors secure,...
ReconaSense - The AI / Access Control / Analytics / IoT / Video Company Profile on Jun 12, 2018
One company's ISC West booth stood out for displaying a light-up tower of buzzwords. The company, ReconaSense, pledged to be 'making sense of it...
The Benefits of An Access Control Test Door on Jun 08, 2018
Security system dealers can benefit from having their own access control test door both for demonstrations and training. Inside, we explain the...
Worst Features for Camera Installation (Statistics) on Jun 07, 2018
4 clear worst features for installing were identified by 140+ integrator respondents to: What feature(s) make a camera hard to install? The...
Princeton Identity Access 200 Iris Scanners Examined on Jun 05, 2018
Iris recently registered a big jump as a preferred biometric in our Favorite Biometrics survey, but access-ready options can be difficult to...
Top Features For Easy Camera Installation (Statistics) on Jun 05, 2018
Camera installation is the most fundamental and common task for video security technicians. Because of this, camera manufacturers market their...

Most Recent Industry Reports

IFSEC Show Report Day 2 Report on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM is live from London reporting on the IFSEC show. The Chinese have taken over the UK, centered on Hikvision, flanked by Dahua, Huawei and a...
Mobotix Releases 'Move' Into 21st Century on Jun 20, 2018
For years, Mobotix stood resolutely against, well, every other manufacturer, selling it as a virtue: MOBOTIX equipment is designed with no...
Cybersecurity Startup VDOO Disclosing 10 Manufacturer Vulnerabilities Starting With Axis And Foscam on Jun 20, 2018
Cybersecurity startup VDOO has uncovered significant vulnerabilities in Axis cameras along with many others not yet disclosed. In this report, we...
July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 19, 2018
The last chance to save $50 on registration is this Thursday, June 21st. Register now and save. This is the only networking course designed...
Axis Guardian - Cloud VMS And Alarm Monitoring - Released on Jun 19, 2018
Axis has struggled to deliver a cloud-based managed service video platform. Video service providers have utilized AVHS for over a decade, and have...
IPVM Vulnerability Scanner Released on Jun 18, 2018
IPVM is proud to announce video surveillance's first and only cybersecurity vulnerability scanner. This tool allows quickly and simply...
Hikvision Corrects False Cybersecurity Announcement on Jun 18, 2018
Hikvision has corrected a false cybersecurity announcement that claimed a British government-sponsored program endorsed the cybersecurity of...
The Dumb Ones: PSA's Bozeman On Cybersecurity on Jun 15, 2018
The smart ones are the hundred people who flew to Denver and spent $500+ on a 1.5-day conference featuring Dahua as a 'cyber responsible partner',...
Amazon Ring Launches $10 Monthly Professional Alarm Monitoring on Jun 15, 2018
Amazon's Ring has announced an alarm system with 24/7 professional alarm monitoring for $10 per month, a fraction of the $30+ per month traditional...
Axis Releases First New Access Controller In 5 Years (A1601) on Jun 15, 2018
It has been 5 years since Axis 2013 entry in the physical access control market, with the A1001 (IPVM test). Now, Axis has released its second...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact