Existing ******** ********* **** ******* *** *** ****** *** ****** ****** ** ** ***** ****** **, ****. That means no leeway or loopholes for existing contracts.
*********** ******** *****, ** accordance **** *** *.***(*), modify— ******** ********** ******** contracts ** ******* *** FAR ****** *** ****** issued ** ** ***** August **, ****, ***** to ******* *** **** orders; *** ******** *********, task ******, *** ******** orders ** ******* *** FAR ****** ** ********* a ************ ** ****** the ****** ** ***********, including ********** ** ******, on ** ***** ****** 13, ****
For ********* *********, No details on how much time that actually means, and "should" is only a recommendation (as opposed to "shall").
**** ********* * ************ to ****** *** ****** of ***********, ********* ********** an ******, ** ** after ****** **, ****, contracting ******** ***** ****** the ************** *** ****** provide * ********** ****** of **** ** **** provide ****** *** ********** the ****** *** ** provide *********** **** ******** time ** ****** **** the ****** *** ******* the **************.
If * *********** ******* ****** * ********** ** ***** ****** ** ***** **************, *** ******* ***** "******* **** *** ******* ******" *** "***** *******". Not many details beyond this, but it's an indication that the DoD is preparing for some contractors that file dishhonest representations in order to keep their government business.
** ** ******* *** represented “**** ***” ** the ************** ** ********* (d)(2) ** *** ********* at *** **.***-**, *** contracting ******* *** **** on *** **************, ****** the *********** ******* *** an *********** ****** ** question *** **************. ** the *********** ******* *** an *********** ****** ** question **** **************, *** contracting ******* ***** ******* with *** ******* ****** or ********* ******** *** legal ******* ** *** to *******
System *** ***** ********** ***** *** *******. The SAM update should provide more details to the many questions contractors still have about the blacklist clause. However, this update is still in the works and DoD did not provide a specific timeline.
*** *** ******* ** working ** ****** *** to ******* * ************** for *** *********** ** 889(a)(1)(B)
This article is part of IPVM's 6,649 reports, 895 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.
Comments (10)
John Honovich
*** *** ** **** you **** ** *** headquarters:
** *** ***********, ** problem **** *** ** al's ******** ** **** this *** **** ****** and ***** *** * years ***.************************ **** ****** **** they ****** ** **** steps ** ****** *** they ***.
*** **** ***** ****** does *** ****? ***'* be ******. *****'* * lot ** ****** ** the ******** *** **** aimed *** ** ****** with **** ********* *** because **** **** **** the **** ***** ** roll.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #1
****** ***,
* **** ***** **** the *******'* **********. ***** the ********* ** *********, and ********** ********* *** letter ** *** ***, the ******* ** ******** quite *********.
*** **** **** ** enforced?
**** * ******* ********** employee **** ** ** office ** ***** *** Dahua *******?
**** ** ******* ******* get * ****** ** the **** **** *** government ******* **** *** cameras **** ** *******? Will **** **** *** to **** ** *********** responsible *** *** ******* and ***********?
***** ** ***, *** can *** ** **** responsible *** ******** * law **** *** *** exist ** *** **** of *** ******** **********. So ** ******* **** I ***** *** ** held *********** *** *** removal ** ******* **** I ********* ****** *** ban.
*** ** ******** ** pay *** *** ******* and *********** ** **** banned *********?
**** * **** *** of ** ******* ********* clients (*** ******) ***** some ****** ********* **** was **** ******** ********* by *** ** ** competitors, *** ******** ******* rather ******: "** **** about *** ***, *** we *** *** ********** any **** ** *** equipment, *** ** **** replace *** ******* ********* cameras **** *** ******* Government ***** ** *** money ** ** **."
* ******* **** **** will ********** *** * line ** **** ******* form, **** *** ********** must ****, ******** **** they ***'* *** ****** equipment. *** ** ****** with ** ********* *** enforcement, **** **** **** lie.
*** **** ***** **** of ************ ** ****** on *** **** ******* it ** ********** **-********. It ** ** ************ leftover **** *** *** of ********. *** ****** who ***** ****** *********** will ***, *** **** likely *******.
**** *** ******* ***** loop **** ** ****. Go ***** *** ********* Bob's *******, *** ** will **** ******** *** corporation *** ************ *** business ** *** ****'* name. ***.
** *** ********** ***** these ******* **** **** fine. *** *** *** responsibility ** *** ******* agencies **********, ** *** federally ****** *************, *** on *** ***********.
***** ** * *** difference ******* ******* ******* cameras (******* * **** idea), *** ************ *** paying ******** ***** **********. (definitely * *** **** and ******** ********** ** do)
****** *** ******* **** far.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #2
**’* ***** ****’** ******* a *******.
**’* **** ***** **** the ******* **.
*** *******, *** *** says
*** ** **** ****** want * ********** ** immediately ****** ******* ********* from ********** **********?
** **** *** ** keep ** ****? ***** it ****? *** ******** it, *** ** ***** cost?
* ***** **** **** thing *** ***** **** would **** ****** ***** questions ****.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #1
******** ****** ******** ******** on ***** **** *** -- ***
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Manufacturer #4
** *** * ******* with *** ***** *** outside ******* ** ****. The ******** ** **** law ** *** ** clear ** ** ***** hope *** *** **** does *** ******** **. We **** ********* **** additional ********.
Create New Topic