Default Passwords Outlawed in California, US To Follow

Author: Dan Gelinas, Published on Oct 09, 2018

A new California bill aimed at improving security for connected devices has been signed into law. The law takes aim especially at passwords on connected devices and will have a significant impact on camera manufacturers, many of whom are not currently compliant.

IPVM interviewed State Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, who sponsored the bill and she told IPVM the intent is to change requirements nationally:

We think that given our state’s economic importance, any product designed for the United States market is going to comply with these reasonable security requirements.

In this note, we:

  • Share detailed feedback from our interview with Senator Jackson
  • Examine the language of the law
  • Discuss the goals of the law
  • Look at what the impact on existing cameras deployed is
  • Examine why out of California sales are still liable
  • Discuss what penalties manufacturers face for non-compliance
  • Examine who is and is not compliant
  • Share feedback from companies that are not currently compliant including Arecont, Avigilon And DW
  • Look at the downsides of compliance
  • Examine potential penalties of non-compliance
  • Discuss the national effect this law will have
  • Analyze criticisms of the law

* *** ********** **** aimed ** ********* ******** for ********* ******* *** been ****** **** ***. The *** ***** *** especially ** ********* ** connected ******* *** **** have * *********** ****** on ****** *************, **** of **** *** *** currently *********.

**** **************** ******* ******-**** *******, *** ********* *** bill *** *** **** IPVM *** ****** ** to ****** ************ **********:

** ***** **** ***** our *****’* ******** **********, any ******* ******** *** the ****** ****** ****** is ***** ** ****** with ***** ********** ******** requirements.

** **** ****, **:

  • ***** ******** ******** **** our ********* **** ******* Jackson
  • ******* *** ******** ** the ***
  • ******* *** ***** ** the ***
  • **** ** **** *** impact ** ******** ******* deployed **
  • ******* *** *** ** California ***** *** ***** liable
  • ******* **** ********* ************* face *** ***-**********
  • ******* *** ** *** is *** *********
  • ***** ******** **** ********* that *** *** ********* compliant ********* *******, ******** And **
  • **** ** *** ********* of **********
  • ******* ********* ********* ** non-compliance
  • ******* *** ******** ****** this *** **** ****
  • ******* ********** ** *** law

[***************]

The ******** ** ** ***

****** **** ***, ******** ****** **** ******** **** **’* ********** Assembly ********* ****** ****, ** ******** ***** Brown ** ********* **, 2018, ********** *** ********* of “********** ******** ********” on ********* *******:

**** ****, ********* ** January *, ****, ************ * ************** * ********* ******, as ***** ***** *** defined,to ***** *** ****** **** * ********** ******** ******* ** ************ *** *********** ** the ****** *** ******** of *** ******, *********** to *** *********** ** may *******, *******, ** transmit, *** ******** ** protect *** ****** *** any *********** ********* ******* from ************ ******, ***********, use, ************, ** **********, as *********. (******** *****)

*** **** **** **** on ** *** **** if * ********* ****** can ** ******** ** a **** ********, **** the “********** ******** *******” requirement **** ** ********* by ******* ****** *** or *** ***** ** two ******** ************:

(*) ******* ** *** of *** ************ ** subdivision (*), ** * connected ****** ** ******** with * ***** ***authentication ******* * ***** **** *******, ** ***** ** deemed *reasonable ******** ******* ***** *********** (*) ** ******** *** ********* ************ are ***:
(*) *** ************* ******** isunique ** **** ****** ************.
(*) *** ****** ******** a ******** ******* ****requires * **** ** ******** * *** ***** ** ************** ****** ****** ** ********* *** ****** *** the ***** ****. (******** added)

**** *********** ***** **** problems *** **** ****** manufacturers *** ** *** require * ***** ** who *** ******-****** ******* logins **** *****/***** **** don’t **** ** ** changed.**** *** * ********* of ******* **************** **** *****.

Proposed ***** ** *** ***

**** *********** ******* ******-**** Jackson *** ********* ** 327. ** **** *****, the ****-********** ** ****** *********** ****. *******, **** it ***** ** ************* and *************** **** *** ***** Botnet ******, ********** ********* **** there *** ** ****** room *** ******* *** buyer ******. ********* ** the *******, *** **** was ** ***** ************** on ************* ** ********* devices:

* ***** ** **** to ***** ******** ***** security ** * *********** element **** ** ****** these ********* *******. *** bill ************ **** **'* the ************ *** *** the ************** ** ******. It's ****** *** ************ who ** ** *** hook.

***********, ******* ******* **** drafters ** *** **** were ******* **** ** came **** ** ******* the *********** ****:

**** **** ********** ***, unless ****** *********, ** becomes *********** *** ** effect ******* * ** the ********* ****, ** 2019. *** ******* ** recognize ****, *****, * lot ** ********* *****’* done ******** **** ********, we ******* **** **** until ******* *, ****, to ****** ***** ******** so **** **** ****** with *** ***.

Grandfathered ******** / ********** **** *******

******* ******* **** **** devices **** ****** *** implementation **** ** ******* 1, ****, ***** ** grandfathered. *******, **** ******* 1, **** ***** ****** anything ************ ****** **** date ***** *** ** sold ** ********** ** it *** ***** ** be ***-*********.

Out ** ********** ***** ***** ******

**** ** * ****** is ******* ** **********, any ****** **** ** offered (*.*., ******) ** sold ** ******* ** California, ***** ***** **** to ******, ********* ** Senator *******:

**'* ***** *** ** comply. ** **'* **** in ** ******* *** sale ** **********, **** it's ******* ** *** state **** *** ****** wouldn't ****** ***** ** was ************ ** ******** or ******* ****. ** would ***** **** **** California ****.

Penalties ** ******** *** *** - ************* ********

*********** ** *** *** itself ***** ********* **** ******* *********-***** attorneys ** ********** *** bring ***** ****** ** a ******** ******* *** non-compliance:

*** ******** *******, * city ********, * ****** counsel, ** * ******** attorney ***** **** *** exclusive ********* ** ******* this *****.

*** **** *** ****** up ** ****'* ********* with ******* ******* *** said **** *** ********* manufacturers *** ***-**********:

** ************* ***'* ******, there's *** ********* **** they're ** ********* ** California’s **** ********* *** and ******** **** **** deal **** ***** *** don't ****** **** *** laws *** ****** ** unfair *********** ***********. ** manufacturers ** **** *** put *** ******** ************** at **** ** ***** attack, * ***** ******* that ****'* ******* ** on *** ***** *** of ** *********** ****** from ****** *** ********** Attorney ******* ** *** other ********* ****** ***********.

******:

******* *******'* ****** ********* us ** *** ** know **** *** ******** of ********* *** ***-********** was * ********* *** since ** ****'* **** done ***. **** *** say **** ********* ***** run *** ***** ** anything *** ******** ******* has ** *** ********:

**’* **** ** ***. It ***** ** **** dependent ** **** *** circumstances ****. ** *** put *** ********* ** non-compliant ******* *** ** caused * ******* *******, then ** ***** ** a ****** ***** *******. Anything **** * **** to * ***************.

US ******** ******

******* **** *********** ***** this ***** *** ************* law ** *** ****** it ** ***** ** have ** *** **** of *** ****** ******. Senator ******* **** *** point ******* ***** ****** IPVM's *********:

**** **** ******* ** connected ******* **** *** sold ** **********, *** given *** ****** ****** share *** *** ********* in *** **** ******, we ***** *** ****** of **** **** **** likely ** **** ****** our *******. **** **** and *** ******** ** a ******* ** ******. Automobiles, *** *******. *** that’s **** **’* **** to ***. **’* **** to ***, ***** *** a ******** ********, *** we’d **** ** *** companies ***** ****** *** issue ** ******* *** security *********. *** **** really *****’* ** ** now. *** ******* ********** is **** * **** marketplace, ** ** ********** companies ****** ‘***’* ****** in **** ***** ******** item ********** ** ***** we **** *** *******.’ And * ***** ***** states ******** **** ****** suit ******. ****’* ********* we **** ***** * bit. ** ***** ** in ********** *** **** other ****** **** ** up *** **** ** becomes *** **** ... We ***** **** ***** our *****’* ******** **********, any ******* ******** *** the ****** ****** ****** is ***** ** ****** with ***** ********** ******** requirements.

**** ** ******* ********, California ** *** **** populous ***** ** *** U.S. **** *****, ** would *** **** ********* sense *** *** ************ to ******* * **********-**** compliant ******* ****. ***** that, *** *******'* ****** that *** ********* ******* sold ** *** *.*. will ***** ** **** the ******* ********* ********** in *** *** ********** law ***** *****.

******, ** ***** ****** many ************* ** **** this ******** ******** ******* the **** *** *********** of *********** ******** **** of ******** ******** ***** be *********.

Compliant ** ***-********* *************

**** ** *** ******* IP ****** ************* *** already *********, *.*., ****, Bosch, *****, ******, *********. However, ******'* ******* ******** ********* shows, **** ** *** smaller ************* *** ***. Three ** *** ****** ones *** ********* ******* Arecont, ******** *** **.

Non-Compliant *********, *******, ********, **, **** **********

***** ************* *** *** not ********* ********* **** us **** **** ** be ** ****** ****.

******** **** **** *** well ** ***** *** to **********:

** **** * ****** of ******* ***** **** either ***** * *** password ** ***** *** the ***** **** ** have * ****** ********. This ** ********* ******** is ********** ** ****** throughout *** *********.

******* ********, ***** **** used *** ******* "*****/*****" combination, ****** ********'* **********:

*********, *** ** ******* and ***** ***** ****** encourage ***** ** ****** the ******* ********* ** our *********, ******* *** other ********* ******* ** a ****** ********. ** a ********** ************, *** new *** ****** *** responsibility ** ***** **** best ******** ** ******* a ****** ******** **** the *** **** ** the ************. ** **** make ** ** **** as ******** *** * user ** ****** * unique ******** ** ******* setup (** **** ** it ** ** ****** a ******** ** *** time **** *** ********), and **** **** ********* security ******* ********* ****** the *********** ******** ** January *, ****.

*******, ******* ******, ***** cameras ** *** **** a *******-****** ******* ******** in *****, **** **** also **** ** ** compliant ** *** ********:

******* ****** ******* ** not ********* ****** **** this ***, ***** **** not **** **** ****** until ****. ********* *** cameras ****** *** **** to *** * ******** on *** ****** *** we ** *** ******* them ** ** **. We ** **** ** comply **** **** *** law ***** ** *** implementation ** **** **** a ******** ****** ** all ** *** ******* generation *******.

** ***** ****** *** companies **** **** ** authorized ** ************ ** become ********* ** ****. However, **** ********* **** only **** *** ****** or **** *** ***, as * **** ** US ******** ******** ***** minimize ***** ****, ****** such *********' ****** ****** are ***** ***.

Firmware ******** ** ****** *********

************, ** ****** ** straightforward *** **** ************* to ****** ********* **** on ******* ******* ***** as * ******** ******* can ******* *** ******* password *** ****** **********. However, ***** **** ** support **********.

The ******** ** ********** - *******

*** ** *** ******* of ******* ********* ** that ** ******* *** number ** ***** *** forget ***** ********* *****, even ** **** '******', they *** ****** *** the ******* ******** (***** many ***** ******) *** get **** **. ** course, **** ************** ********* the **** ** ******** breaches.

*******, **** * ************ customer ******* **********, *********** default ********* ************* ********* support ***** *** **********. One ******** ************* **** taken ** ****** ***** problems ** ** ********* effectively * **** **** that ****** *** ************ to ***** *** ***** password. **** *** *** own *****, *.*.,********* ******** ***** **** cracked * *** ***** ago.

Critics ********

**** ****** ***** ********** ***** **'* * good ***** ** ******** weak ** **** ** actually ******. *** *** Cybersecurity *** *** **** has *** *******.

******** ************* ******** ****** ************* ** *** **** on *** ********** ******* *********** *** ** backward—instead ** ******* ************* to *** ********, **** should ** ******* ************* to ****** ********:

****** ** ****** **** adding ***** ******** ******** is * ******* ******* manufacturers ****** ** ******** insecure ********, *******. *******, a ****** ****** ***** be ** ** ****. Absolutely ************* ****** ****** telnet *** *** *** other ****** ******* ******** if **** *** *** used ******* **** *** additional ********* **********. *** there ** ******* *** that ***** **** ** eliminating ******* ********* *** forcing ****** *********.

****** ******** **** **** law *** ***** **** that *** ****** *** reactionary *** ********* *********:

***********, ***** ******* ******** of *** *** ***** that *** ******** *****'* specify ******* ****** **** the ***** "********** ******** feature" *****. **** *** example*** ******* **** ********, ***** ********* ******* litigation:

** *** ********, ** least **** **** *********** ("requires * **** ** generate * *** ***** of ************** ****** ****** is *******") ** ***** clear.

************** **** ** *** Access ************* ********** ** *** punitive ******* *** **** the ****** ** *** punitive ******** ***'* ********* in *** ******** ** the ***:

** ****** **** **** and ** *** ***** attempting ** ********* **** the ******** ******* ******** of.

OEMs ********?

*******, ************** **** *** **** Arnold & ****** ****** there *** ** * loophole*** *****-******* *******:

*** ******** ********* ** this *********** ** ***** in ******* ****.**.**, ********** (c):

(*) “************” ***** *** person *** ************, ** contracts **** ******* ****** to *********** ** *** person’s ******, ********* ******* that *** **** ** offered *** **** ** California. *** *** ******** of **** ***********, * contract **** ******* ****** to *********** ** *** person’s ******does *** ******* * ************ ** ******** * connected ******, **only ** ******** *** ***** * ********* ******. (******** *****)

******:

**** *** ****** **** the *******'* ****** ***** this ********* ********. **** explained **** ** *** a ******** ***** *** original ********* ************ ** still ** *** **** to ****** ****** *** device ** ***** *******. The *****-******** ******* ***** not **** *********, *** the ******** ********* ************ would.

Poll / ****

Comments (26)

** ** * ***** that **** *** ** even ****** * ***. However, ******* * ******** to **** ***** ** long *******.

***** ** ** *** CA **** ** **** to ***** *** *** different ************* *** **** out *****. ** ***'* Camera **** ** ***** to ****** *** ** domes **** ******* **** default ********* *** **** sell **** ** *** residential ******, *** ** anyone ***** ** ***** that? **** ** **** person ** ********* ******* Joe's ****** ***** ******** or ********* ** ******* are ******* *********, **** is ****** ** ** about ******** ***** *******?

***** ** ******** (*** manufactured **** ***** *** local ********** *****) *** not ****** ****** ********* years ***, *** ** will ** **** *** them ** ****** **. However, ***** ** *** Arecont *** ***, ** will *** *** **** goes. **** ** **** enough ********* **** *** to ******* **** ** change, ** ** **'* sales ** *** ******* insignificant ******** ** ****** sales ** *** **** other ****?

** **** *** **** national, ** **** **** millions ** *** * committee ******** ** ***** and **** **********. ***** needs ** ** * standard ******* **** * logo, **** **, ****** on *** *****, ***. Then ***** ***** ** be *********** ** **** standard ** *** ******* knows **** ** *****.

***** ** ******** (*** manufactured **** ***** *** local ********** *****) *** not ****** ****** ********* years ***,

******** ***** ** *** with *** ***** ******** program *** ****** ********* like *********.

Image result for you got served gif

********* *** ******** ** that ** ******* $*********** to ***** *** ******** all **** **********, *********, and **** ******** ************. This **** ******* * licence *** ******* ** the ***** ** **********, and ***** ** **** start * ***-*********** *** each ************ ** **** can *** ** ** the ******. ;)

**** *** *** ******* puts *** ******** ** the **** ** ******* change **********, ****** **** focusing ** ******* *** constituency **** **** *******.

** * ******* ****, yes *** * ***** idea ** **** *** create *** ***** ******** as **** ** *** connect ** *** ****. Just **** **** ** blow **** *** ** data *** ************** ** reset ** **** *** end **** ** ******** tech **** **. (*.* by **** ****** **** is **** ** *** are ********** ** *** unit *** ********* *** hackers ********.)

**** ** ***** *** Government ***** ** **** out *** **** ***** own ********.

**** **** ****** ** their *** ******** ******** to **** ** ****** getting ******** ** ********.

********** ***** ** **** ***** *** ******** *** **** ***** hands ***. *** ***** ***** ***** ** ** *** *******/****** state (******, ****, & ******).

**** $$$ ** *** pockets ** ******** ******* companies. *** ****, "**** custodiet ***** ********"?

*'* ***** *** ******** California **** ** *** it ****** ** **** another **** ****** * socialists **********. ***** ** very ****** **** ***** does **** ***** *** sense.

** *** *** * Support ******* *** * company **** ************ ** cameras, *** *** ************** *** ********** ********* that **** ** ******** once **** *** ** implemented.

** ***'** **** ******** why ********* **** **** default ********* ** ******* when - **** **** - **** ** *** very ******.... *** ****** is ******** ***** ******:

****** *** ****.

*** ***** *** ***** of ********** ** ***-**-*** use **** ** ********** into*********, *** *** ****** a *********** **** ** support *****.

******** ** **** **** of *** ********, ** 'forgetting *********' *****, ** least ******, ******* ** what *** ** ********* with ********.

******* ** ******-******... "*** * ******* ********, ** ** ****."

*** **** ** **...

********** *** **** **** on **** *****. *******, but *** *** **** time ** **** *****....

********* ******** *****, *** billion+ *** ******* **** will ** ** *** Internet ** *** **** 5-10 ***** **** ***** for ************* ******* ** not ******. *********' ********* of ************* ** ***** home *******, ******** *** smart **** ******* ** infinitesimal. ***** ** * major ******* ******* *** I'm *** ****** ********** intervention ** *** **** way ** ******* ******** massive **** ** ****** and **** **** * cyber ****** ** * transportation\utility\or *** ******, *** something ***** ** ******.

**** ******** **** ** **** ** ****. **'* ****** *****.

[**** ****: *** ******** **** ** **** ** *********** ***,****** ****, *** ******* ********** *****]

********, ***** **** ** GDPR ************ ** ** in? **** ** *** first * ***** ** anyone ******** **** ** curious**** ******* ** ************* ****.

***'** **** ** ***** by *****/******* ****** ** this.

**** ** ***********.

**** ** ***** * boxes, *** ***** '********* Onvoldoende ***********', ** *******: Example ************ ********. ** this **** **'* ****** that *** ******** *** default ******** (*******************) ** regarded ** ************ ********.

**** ******** ** ***** back ** ******* ****, it *** ******* **** back ****.
** ** *** **** it **** **** ******. GDPR ** ********** **** AVG ** *****.
** **** ********* **** of *** ******** ** this *******:*** ** ****.

*** **** ****** *****'* mention ********* ********. *******, it **** ******* "**** protection ** ****** *** default" (******* **) ****** **** "*** controller ***** ********* *********** technical *** ************** ******** to ****** *** ** be **** ** *********** that ********** ** ********* in ********** **** **** Regulation." (******* **.)

*** "*********** ********* *** organisational ********" *** ***** actually ******* ** *** GDPR, ***** **** ******* references ** "**********" *** "****************." ***** specifics *** **** ** to *** ********-***** **** protection *********** (****) **** the *** ** *** Netherlands.

** ***** *** **** itself *** ** "******** rule," ******** ***'* ***** to ***** *** **** a ******** *** ** capable ** ************ *** GDPR ** ******* **** default ********* *** *** allowed.

***** *** *** ******** Charles. **** ** ****.

*********, **** **** *** completely ******** ****** ***********, but ******* ***** ******* that ****** *********** ** prohibited.

********, **** ******** **** minimalisation, *** * ** not **** * ****** of **** ** ***. In ***** ***** ***** is * *** ** 28 ****, *** **** incidents *** ** ****** longer, *** **** ** deleted **** *** ******** is ********.

*******:

****** ****, **'** ***** some ******* ****** ***** re: ********* ********* *** also *** ******** ******** for *****-******* *******.

*** **** ** *** don't **** ** ****** for **, **** *** the ******* **** *** story:

******:

******* *******'* ****** ********* us ** *** ** know **** *** ******** of ********* *** ***-********** was * ********* *** since ** ****'* **** done ***. **** *** say **** ********* ***** run *** ***** ** anything *** ******** ******* has ** *** ********:

**’* **** ** ***. It ***** ** **** dependent ** **** *** circumstances ****. ** *** put *** ********* ** non-compliant ******* *** ** caused * ******* *******, then ** ***** ** a ****** ***** *******. Anything **** * **** to * ***************.

******:

**** *** ****** **** the *******'* ****** ***** this ********* ********. **** explained **** ** *** a ******** ***** *** original ********* ************ ** still ** *** **** to ****** ****** *** device ** ***** *******. The *****-******** ******* ***** not **** *********, *** the ******** ********* ************ would.

******** **** * **** ** * ***************.

** ***** ***, ********* **** **********, ********* *********, ******** ** Anaheim.

*** ************ **** ** liable ** ** *** decides ** **** *** product ** **********, **** out **'* *********?
** **** **** ***** law, ** *** ************ does *** **** * physical ******** ** **********, there's *** **** ********** can **. ** ***** was, **** ****** ***** be ********** ***** *** from *** ** ***** sales.

**** ** ******* *****.

...*** ** ******, ********** of *** ********* ********** goals ** **** ******* from **********, ** *** will ** * **** mine *** ***** **** share *** ******** ****** of ******:other *******.

****'* *** ******** ******* **** ** **'* *** ** **** anyways? *** ***** ****** **** **?

* ***** ***. **** alarm ****** **** ********* have ******** ****** ***** they *** *** *** costumers. **** ***** ** easy *** *** *********** crew *** ** *** safe. ** *** ******** leaves ** ****** ****, a **** ******** ** installations ** ***********.

* ***** ** ***** regulation ** **** **** practise ******** ********.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
Spring 2019 50+ New Products Directory on Apr 08, 2019
We are compiling a list of new products for Spring 2019 and have over 50 already. Contrast to Fall 2018 New Products Directory and Spring 2018...
Huawei Sues US Government Over NDAA Ban on Mar 07, 2019
Chinese telecom giant Huawei is suing the US government over the NDAA ban, arguing that key provisions in it are unconstitutional.  NDAA Section...
Milestone Launches Marketplace Where Nothing Is For Sale on Feb 26, 2019
The central announcement at Milestone's annual conference MIPS is Marketplace, which Milestone compared to Uber and Match.com for its ability to...
No Genetec Major Releases In Over A Year on Feb 06, 2019
Annual VMS licenses are a controversial practice in the video surveillance industry, with many questioning their need or value. However, enterprise...
Austria’s First GDPR Fine Is For Video Surveillance on Jan 29, 2019
Should EU businesses be concerned if police see a business' surveillance cameras filming public areas? This is what happened with Austria’s first...
The Battle For The VSaaS Market Begins 2019 - Alarm.com, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Verkada, More on Jan 02, 2019
2019 will be the year that VSaaS finally becomes a real factor for professional video surveillance. While Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS)...
ASCMA / Moni Problems Deepen, Lenders Terminate Support Agreement on Dec 28, 2018
Ascent Capital Group, aka ASCMA, currently branded Brinks Home Security, formerly known as Moni and Monitronics faces a troubling end to a rocky...
Sublethal Camera Gun Examined on Dec 06, 2018
Sublethal is a South African company that manufactures a remotely-controlled, camera-enabled gun called the Boomslang, which is Afrikaans for tree...

Most Recent Industry Reports

19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
 Register for the Spring 2019 Access Control Course----Closed IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact