Default Passwords Outlawed in California, US To Follow

By: Dan Gelinas, Published on Oct 09, 2018

A new California bill aimed at improving security for connected devices has been signed into law. The law takes aim especially at passwords on connected devices and will have a significant impact on camera manufacturers, many of whom are not currently compliant.

IPVM interviewed State Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, who sponsored the bill and she told IPVM the intent is to change requirements nationally:

We think that given our state’s economic importance, any product designed for the United States market is going to comply with these reasonable security requirements.

In this note, we:

  • Share detailed feedback from our interview with Senator Jackson
  • Examine the language of the law
  • Discuss the goals of the law
  • Look at what the impact on existing cameras deployed is
  • Examine why out of California sales are still liable
  • Discuss what penalties manufacturers face for non-compliance
  • Examine who is and is not compliant
  • Share feedback from companies that are not currently compliant including Arecont, Avigilon And DW 
  • Look at the downsides of compliance
  • Examine potential penalties of non-compliance
  • Discuss the national effect this law will have
  • Analyze criticisms of the law

* *** ********** **** aimed ** ********* ******** for ********* ******* *** been ****** **** ***. The *** ***** *** especially ** ********* ** connected ******* *** **** have * *********** ****** on ****** *************, **** of **** *** *** currently *********.

**** **************** ******* ******-**** *******, *** ********* *** bill *** *** **** **** the ****** ** ** change ************ **********:

** ***** **** ***** our *****’* ******** **********, any ******* ******** *** the ****** ****** ****** is ***** ** ****** with ***** ********** ******** requirements.

** **** ****, **:

  • ***** ******** ******** **** our ********* **** ******* Jackson
  • ******* *** ******** ** the ***
  • ******* *** ***** ** the ***
  • **** ** **** *** impact ** ******** ******* deployed **
  • ******* *** *** ** California ***** *** ***** liable
  • ******* **** ********* ************* face *** ***-**********
  • ******* *** ** *** is *** *********
  • ***** ******** **** ********* that *** *** ********* compliant ********* *******, ******** And ** 
  • **** ** *** ********* of **********
  • ******* ********* ********* ** non-compliance
  • ******* *** ******** ****** this *** **** ****
  • ******* ********** ** *** law

[***************]

The ******** ** ** ***

****** **** ***, ******** ****** **** ******** **** **’* ********** Assembly ********* ****** ****, ** ******** ***** Brown ** ********* **, 2018, ********** *** ********* of “********** ******** ********” on ********* *******:

**** ****, ********* ** January *, ****, ************ * ************** * ********* ******, as ***** ***** *** defined,to ***** *** ****** **** * ********** ******** ******* ** ************ *** *********** ** the ****** *** ******** of *** ******, *********** to *** *********** ** may *******, *******, ** transmit, *** ******** ** protect *** ****** *** any *********** ********* ******* from ************ ******, ***********, use, ************, ** **********, as *********. (******** *****)

*** **** **** **** on ** *** **** if * ********* ****** can ** ******** ** a **** ********, **** the “********** ******** *******” requirement **** ** ********* by ******* ****** *** or *** ***** ** two ******** ************:

(*) ******* ** *** ** the ************ ** *********** (a), ** * ********* device ** ******** **** a ***** ***authentication ******* * ***** **** *******, ** ***** ** deemed *reasonable ******** ******* ***** *********** (*) ** ******** *** ********* ************ are ***:
(*) *** ************* ******** **unique ** **** ****** ************.
(*) *** ****** ******** * security ******* ****requires * **** ** ******** * *** ***** ** ************** ****** ****** ** ********* *** ****** *** the ***** ****. (******** added)

**** *********** ***** **** problems *** **** ****** manufacturers *** ** *** require * ***** ** who *** ******-****** ******* logins **** *****/***** **** don’t **** ** ** changed.**** *** * ********* of ******* **************** **** *****.

Proposed ***** ** *** ***

**** *********** ******* ******-**** Jackson *** ********* ** 327. ** **** *****, the ****-****** **** ** ****** *********** ****. *******, **** it ***** ** ************* and *************** **** *** ***** Botnet ******, ********** ********* **** there *** ** ****** room *** ******* *** buyer ******. ********* ** the *******, *** **** was ** ***** ************** on ************* ** ********* devices:

* ***** ** **** to ***** ******** ***** security ** * *********** element **** ** ****** these ********* *******. *** bill ************ **** **'* the ************ *** *** the ************** ** ******. It's ****** *** ************ who ** ** *** hook.

***********, ******* ******* **** drafters ** *** **** were ******* **** ** came **** ** ******* the *********** ****:

**** **** ********** ***, unless ****** *********, ** becomes *********** *** ** effect ******* * ** the ********* ****, ** 2019. *** ******* ** recognize ****, *****, * lot ** ********* *****’* done ******** **** ********, we ******* **** **** until ******* *, ****, to ****** ***** ******** so **** **** ****** with *** ***.

Grandfathered ******** / ********** **** *******

******* ******* **** **** devices **** ****** *** implementation **** ** ******* 1, ****, ***** ** grandfathered. *******, **** ******* 1, **** ***** ****** anything ************ ****** **** date ***** *** ** sold ** ********** ** it *** ***** ** be ***-*********.

Out ** ********** ***** ***** ******

**** ** * ****** is ******* ** **********, any ****** **** ** offered (*.*., ******) ** sold ** ******* ** California, ***** ***** **** to ******, ********* ** Senator *******:

**'* ***** *** ** comply. ** **'* **** in ** ******* *** sale ** **********, **** it's ******* ** *** state **** *** ****** wouldn't ****** ***** ** was ************ ** ******** or ******* ****. ** would ***** **** **** California ****.

Penalties ** ******** *** *** - ************* ********

*********** ** *** *** itself ***** ********* **** ******* *********-***** attorneys ** ********** *** bring ***** ****** ** a ******** ******* *** non-compliance:

*** ******** *******, * city ********, * ****** counsel, ** * ******** attorney ***** **** *** exclusive ********* ** ******* this *****.

*** **** *** ****** up ** ****'* ********* with ******* ******* *** said **** *** ********* manufacturers *** ***-**********:

** ************* ***'* ******, there's *** ********* **** they're ** ********* ** California’s **** ********* *** and ******** **** **** deal **** ***** *** don't ****** **** *** laws *** ****** ** unfair *********** ***********. ** manufacturers ** **** *** put *** ******** ************** at **** ** ***** attack, * ***** ******* that ****'* ******* ** on *** ***** *** of ** *********** ****** from ****** *** ********** Attorney ******* ** *** other ********* ****** ***********.

******:

******* *******'* ****** ********* us ** *** ** know **** *** ******** of ********* *** ***-********** was * ********* *** since ** ****'* **** done ***. **** *** say **** ********* ***** run *** ***** ** anything *** ******** ******* has ** *** ********:

**’* **** ** ***. It ***** ** **** dependent ** **** *** circumstances ****. ** *** put *** ********* ** non-compliant ******* *** ** caused * ******* *******, then ** ***** ** a ****** ***** *******. Anything **** * **** to * ***************.

US ******** ******

******* **** *********** ***** this ***** *** ************* law ** *** ****** it ** ***** ** have ** *** **** of *** ****** ******. Senator ******* **** *** point ******* ***** ****** IPVM's *********:

**** **** ******* ** connected ******* **** *** sold ** **********, *** given *** ****** ****** share *** *** ********* in *** **** ******, we ***** *** ****** of **** **** **** likely ** **** ****** our *******. **** **** and *** ******** ** a ******* ** ******. Automobiles, *** *******. *** that’s **** **’* **** to ***. **’* **** to ***, ***** *** a ******** ********, *** we’d **** ** *** companies ***** ****** *** issue ** ******* *** security *********. *** **** really *****’* ** ** now. *** ******* ********** is **** * **** marketplace, ** ** ********** companies ****** ‘***’* ****** in **** ***** ******** item ********** ** ***** we **** *** *******.’ And * ***** ***** states ******** **** ****** suit ******. ****’* ********* we **** ***** * bit. ** ***** ** in ********** *** **** other ****** **** ** up *** **** ** becomes *** **** ... ** think **** ***** *** state’s ******** **********, *** product ******** *** *** United ****** ****** ** going ** ****** **** these ********** ******** ************.

**** ** ******* ********, California ** *** **** populous ***** ** *** U.S. **** *****, ** would *** **** ********* sense *** *** ************ to ******* * **********-**** compliant ******* ****. ***** that, *** *******'* ****** that *** ********* ******* sold ** *** *.*. will ***** ** **** the ******* ********* ********** in *** *** ********** law ***** *****.

******, ** ***** ****** many ************* ** **** this ******** ******** ******* the **** *** *********** of *********** ******** **** of ******** ******** ***** be *********.

Compliant ** ***-********* *************

**** ** *** ******* IP ****** ************* *** already *********, *.*., ****, Bosch, *****, ******, *********. However, ******'* ******* ******** ********* shows, **** ** *** smaller ************* *** ***. Three ** *** ****** ones *** ********* ******* Arecont, ******** *** **.

Non-Compliant *********, *******, ********, **, **** **********

***** ************* *** *** not ********* ********* **** us **** **** ** be ** ****** ****.

******** **** **** *** well ** ***** *** to **********:

** **** * ****** of ******* ***** **** either ***** * *** password ** ***** *** the ***** **** ** have * ****** ********. This ** ********* ******** is ********** ** ****** throughout *** *********.

******* ********, ***** **** used *** ******* "*****/*****" combination, ****** ********'* **********:

*********, *** ** ******* and ***** ***** ****** encourage ***** ** ****** the ******* ********* ** our *********, ******* *** other ********* ******* ** a ****** ********. ** a ********** ************, *** new *** ****** *** responsibility ** ***** **** best ******** ** ******* a ****** ******** **** the *** **** ** the ************. ** **** make ** ** **** as ******** *** * user ** ****** * unique ******** ** ******* setup (** **** ** it ** ** ****** a ******** ** *** time **** *** ********), and **** **** ********* security ******* ********* ****** the *********** ******** ** January *, ****.

*******, ******* ******, ***** cameras ** *** **** a *******-****** ******* ******** in *****, **** **** also **** ** ** compliant ** *** ********:

******* ****** ******* ** not ********* ****** **** this ***, ***** **** not **** **** ****** until ****. ********* *** cameras ****** *** **** to *** * ******** on *** ****** *** we ** *** ******* them ** ** **. We ** **** ** comply **** **** *** law ***** ** *** implementation ** **** **** a ******** ****** ** all ** *** ******* generation *******.

** ***** ****** *** companies **** **** ** authorized ** ************ ** become ********* ** ****. However, **** ********* **** only **** *** ****** or **** *** ***, as * **** ** US ******** ******** ***** minimize ***** ****, ****** such *********' ****** ****** *** quite ***.

Firmware ******** ** ****** *********

************, ** ****** ** straightforward *** **** ************* to ****** ********* **** on ******* ******* ***** as * ******** ******* can ******* *** ******* password *** ****** **********. However, ***** **** ** support **********.

The ******** ** ********** - *******

*** ** *** ******* of ******* ********* ** that ** ******* *** number ** ***** *** forget ***** ********* *****, even ** **** '******', they *** ****** *** the ******* ******** (***** many ***** ******) *** get **** **. ** course, **** ************** ********* the **** ** ******** breaches.

*******, **** * ************ customer ******* **********, *********** default ********* ************* ********* support ***** *** **********. One ******** ************* **** taken ** ****** ***** problems ** ** ********* effectively * **** **** that ****** *** ************ to ***** *** ***** password. **** *** *** own *****, *.*.,********* ******** ***** **** cracked * *** ***** ago.

Critics ********

**** ****** ***** ******* *** ***** **'* * good ***** ** ******** weak ** **** ** actually ******. *** *** Cybersecurity *** *** **** has *** *******.

******** ******* ****** ****** ** ****** ************* ** *** **** on *** ********** *** **** *********** *** ** backward—instead ** ******* ************* to *** ********, **** should ** ******* ************* ** remove ********:

****** ** ****** **** ****** these ******** ******** ** a ******* ******* ************* should ** ******** ******** features, *******. *******, * better ****** ***** ** to ** ****. ********** manufacturers ****** ****** ****** and *** *** ***** unused ******* ******** ** they *** *** **** because **** *** ********** potential **********. *** ***** is ******* *** **** could **** ** *********** default ********* *** ******* strong *********.

****** ******** **** **** law *** ***** **** that *** ****** *** reactionary *** ********* *********:

***********, ***** ******* ******** of *** *** ***** that *** ******** *****'* specify ******* ****** **** the ***** "********** ******** feature" *****. **** *** example*** ******* **** ********, ***** ********* ******* litigation:

** *** ********, ** least **** **** *********** ("requires * **** ** generate * *** ***** of ************** ****** ****** is *******") ** ***** clear.

************** **** ** *** Access ************* ********** ** *** punitive ******* *** **** the ****** ** *** punitive ******** ***'* ********* in *** ******** ** the ***:

** ****** **** **** and ** *** ***** attempting ** ********* **** the ******** ******* ******** of.

OEMs ********?

*******, ************** **** *** **** Arnold & ****** ****** there *** ** * loophole*** *****-******* *******:

*** ******** ********* ** this *********** ** ***** in ******* ****.**.**, ********** (*):

(*) “************” ***** *** ****** who ************, ** ********* with ******* ****** ** manufacture ** *** ******’* behalf, ********* ******* **** are **** ** ******* for **** ** **********. For *** ******** ** this ***********, * ******** with ******* ****** ** manufacture ** *** ******’* behalfdoes *** ******* * ************ ** ******** * connected ******, **only ** ******** *** ***** * ********* ******. (******** *****)

******:

**** *** ****** **** the *******'* ****** ***** this ********* ********. **** explained **** ** *** a ******** ***** *** original ********* ************ ** still ** *** **** to ****** ****** *** device ** ***** *******. The *****-******** ******* ***** not **** *********, *** the ******** ********* ************ would.

Poll / ****

Comments (26)

** ** * ***** that **** *** ** even ****** * ***.  However, ******* * ******** to **** ***** ** long *******.

***** ** ** *** CA **** ** **** to ***** *** *** different ************* *** **** out *****. ** ***'* Camera **** ** ***** to ****** *** ** domes from ******* **** ******* passwords *** **** **** them ** *** *********** market, *** ** ****** going ** ***** ****? Even ** **** ****** or ********* ******* ***'* ****** after ******** ** ********* of ******* *** ******* installed, **** ** ****** to ** ***** ******** those *******?

***** ** ******** (*** manufactured **** ***** *** local ********** *****) *** not ****** ****** ********* years ***, *** ** will ** **** *** them ** ****** **. However, ***** ** *** Arecont *** ***, ** will *** *** **** goes. **** ** **** enough ********* **** *** to ******* **** ** change, ** ** **'* sales ** *** ******* insignificant ******** ** ****** sales ** *** **** other ****? 

** **** *** **** ********, it **** **** ******** to *** * ********* together ** ***** *** test **********. ***** ***** to ** * ******** created **** * ****, like **, ****** ** all *****, ***. **** there ***** ** ** advertising ** **** ******** so *** ******* ***** what ** *****.

***** ** ******** (*** manufactured **** ***** *** local ********** *****) *** not ****** ****** ********* years ***,

******** ***** ** *** with *** ***** ******** program *** ****** ********* like *********.

Image result for you got served gif

********* *** ******** ** that ** ******* $*********** to ***** *** ******** all **** **********, *********, and **** ******** ************.  This **** ******* * licence *** ******* ** the ***** ** **********, and ***** ** **** start * ***-*********** *** each ************ ** **** can *** ** ** the ******. ;)

**** *** *** ******* puts *** ******** ** the **** ** ******* change **********, ****** **** focusing ** ******* *** constituency **** **** *******.

 

** * ******* ****, yes *** * ***** idea ** **** *** create *** ***** ******** as **** ** *** connect ** *** ****. Just **** **** ** blow **** *** ** data *** ************** ** reset ** **** *** end **** ** ******** tech **** **. (*.* by **** ****** **** is **** ** *** are ********** ** *** unit *** ********* *** hackers ********.)

**** ** ***** *** Government ***** ** **** out *** **** ***** own ********.

**** **** ****** ** their *** ******** ******** to **** ** ****** getting ******** ** ********.

********** ***** ** **** their *** ******** *** keep ***** ***** ***. NOT ***** ***** ***** to ** *** *******/****** state (******, ****, & Flakes).

**** $$$ ** *** pockets ** ******** ******* companies. *** ****, "**** custodiet ***** ********"?

*'* ***** *** ******** California **** ** *** it ****** ** **** another **** ****** * socialists **********. ***** ** very ****** **** ***** does **** ***** *** sense.

** *** *** * Support ******* *** * company **** ************ ** cameras, *** *** ************** *** ********** ********* that **** ** ******** once **** *** ** implemented.

** ***'** **** ******** why ********* **** **** default ********* ** ******* when - **** **** - **** ** *** very ******.... *** ****** is ******** ***** ******:

****** *** ****.

*** ***** *** ***** of ********** ** ***-**-*** use **** ** ********** into*********, *** *** ****** a *********** **** ** support *****.

******** ** **** **** of *** ********, ** 'forgetting *********' *****, ** least ******, ******* ** what *** ** ********* with ********. 

 

******* ** ******-******... "*** a ******* ********, ** to ****."

*** **** ** **...

********** *** **** **** on **** *****.  *******, but *** *** **** time ** **** *****....

********* ******** *****, *** billion+ *** ******* **** will ** ** *** Internet ** *** **** 5-10 ***** **** ***** for ************* ******* ** not ******.  *********' ********* of ************* ** ***** home *******, ******** *** smart **** ******* ** infinitesimal. ***** ** * major ******* ******* *** I'm *** ****** ********** intervention ** *** **** way ** ******* ******** massive **** ** ****** and **** **** * cyber ****** ** * transportation\utility\or *** ******, *** something ***** ** ******.

**** ******** **** ** part ** ****. **'* common *****.

[**** ****: *** ******** rule ** **** ** Netherlands ***,****** ****, *** ******* discussion *****]

********, ***** **** ** GDPR ************ ** ** in? **** ** *** first * ***** ** anyone ******** **** ** curious**** ******* ** ************* ****.

***'** **** ** ***** by *****/******* ****** ** this.

**** ** ***********.

**** ** ***** * boxes, *** ***** '********* Onvoldoende ***********', ** *******: Example ************ ********. ** this **** **'* ****** that *** ******** *** default ******** (*******************) ** regarded ** ************ ********.

**** ******** ** ***** back ** ******* ****, it *** ******* **** back ****.
** ** *** **** it **** **** ******. GDPR ** ********** **** AVG ** *****.
** **** ********* **** of *** ******** ** this *******:*** ** ****.

 

*** **** ****** *****'* mention ********* ********. *******, it **** ******* "**** protection ** ****** *** default" (******* **) ****** **** "*** controller ***** ********* *********** technical *** ************** ******** to ****** *** ** be **** ** *********** that ********** ** ********* in ********** **** **** Regulation." (******* **.)

*** "*********** ********* *** organisational ********" *** ***** actually ******* ** *** GDPR, ***** **** ******* references ** "**********" *** "****************." ***** specifics *** **** ** to *** ********-***** **** protection *********** (****) **** the *** ** *** Netherlands.

** ***** *** **** itself *** ** "******** rule," ******** ***'* ***** to ***** *** **** a ******** *** ** capable ** ************ *** GDPR ** ******* **** default ********* *** *** allowed.

***** *** *** ******** Charles. **** ** ****.

*********, **** **** *** completely ******** ****** ***********, but ******* ***** ******* that ****** *********** ** prohibited.

********, **** ******** **** minimalisation, *** * ** not **** * ****** of **** ** ***. In ***** ***** ***** is * *** ** 28 ****, *** **** incidents *** ** ****** longer, *** **** ** deleted **** *** ******** is ********.

 

 

*******:

****** ****, **'** ***** some ******* ****** ***** re: ********* ********* *** also *** ******** ******** for *****-******* *******.

*** **** ** *** don't **** ** ****** for **, **** *** the ******* **** *** story:

******:

******* *******'* ****** ********* us ** *** ** know **** *** ******** of ********* *** ***-********** was * ********* *** since ** ****'* **** done ***. **** *** say **** ********* ***** run *** ***** ** anything *** ******** ******* has ** *** ********:

**’* **** ** ***. It ***** ** **** dependent ** **** *** circumstances ****. ** *** put *** ********* ** non-compliant ******* *** ** caused * ******* *******, then ** ***** ** a ****** ***** *******. Anything **** * **** to * ***** **********.

******:

**** *** ****** **** the *******'* ****** ***** this ********* ********. **** explained **** ** *** a ******** ***** *** original ********* ************ ** still ** *** **** to ****** ****** *** device ** ***** *******. The *****-******** ******* ***** not **** *********, *** the ******** ********* ************ would.

******** **** * **** to * ***************.

 ** ***** ***, ********* ASIS **********, ********* *********, whenever ** *******.

*** ************ **** ** liable ** ** *** decides ** **** *** product ** **********, **** out **'* *********?  
** **** **** ***** law, ** *** ************ does *** **** * physical ******** ** **********, there's *** **** ********** can **.  ** ***** was, **** ****** ***** be ********** ***** *** from *** ** ***** sales.

**** ** ******* *****.

...*** ** ******, ********** of *** ********* ********** goals ** **** ******* from **********, ** *** will ** * **** mine *** ***** **** share *** ******** ****** of ******: other *******.

****'* *** ******** ******* well ** **'* *** to **** *******? *** would ****** **** **?

* ***** ***. **** alarm ****** **** ********* have ******** ****** ***** they *** *** *** costumers. **** ***** ** easy *** *** *********** crew *** ** *** safe. ** *** ******** leaves ** ****** ****, a **** ******** ** installations ** ***********.

* ***** ** ***** regulation ** **** **** practise ******** ********.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Uniview OEM Directory on Sep 11, 2019
This directory lists 20+ companies that OEM products from Uniview, with a graphic and links to company websites below. It does not cover all...
Genetec Stratocast VSaaS Tested on Sep 05, 2019
The VSaaS market is rapidly expanding in 2019, with Verkada, Meraki, Eagle Eye, Avigilon and numerous startups growing their market share. When we...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
Dahua OEM Directory on Aug 16, 2019
US Government banned Dahua OEMs for dozens of companies. The following directory includes 40+ of those companies with a graphic and links to...
Hikvision OEM Directory on Aug 13, 2019
The Chinese government-owned and US-government banned Hikvision has become the world's largest video surveillance manufacturer and generally hidden...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Aug 11, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to ab emerging AI cloud era.  The goal of this history is to...
RaySharp Revealed - Major China OEM For Western Consumer Video Surveillance on Jul 02, 2019
RaySharp is mostly unknown, even among people in the video surveillance industry, though it is a major supplier of OEM surveillance equipment such...
Directory of 60 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs on Jun 17, 2019
Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still...

Most Recent Industry Reports

How Cobalt Robotics May Disrupt Security on Sep 13, 2019
While security robots have largely become a joke over the last few years, one organization, Cobalt Robotics, has raised $50+ million from top US...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
ASIS GSX 2019 Show Report Final on Sep 12, 2019
IPVM went to Chicago for ASIS GSX 2019, with many exhibitors disappointed about traffic and the exhibitor schedule changing next year. Inside we...
Installation Course - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 12, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. Thursday, September 12th is your last chance to register for the...
Commend ID5 Intercom Tested on Sep 12, 2019
Commend touts the new ID5 intercom as 'timelessly elegant' and the slim body, glass front touchscreen indeed looks better than common, but ugly,...
US State Department: "Chinese Tech Giants" "Tools of the Chinese Communist Party" on Sep 12, 2019
The US State Department has called out "Chinese tech giants" for being "tools of the Chinese Communist Party" in a blunt new speech that makes...
Uniview OEM Directory on Sep 11, 2019
This directory lists 20+ companies that OEM products from Uniview, with a graphic and links to company websites below. It does not cover all...
Yi Home Camera 3 AI Analytics Tested on Sep 10, 2019
Yi Technology is claiming "new AI features" in its $50 Home Camera 3 "eliminates 'false positives' caused by flying insects, small pets, or light...
Hanwha Announces 32MP Camera + AI Line on Sep 10, 2019
In the first rise in maximum megapixel resolution in 5 years, Hanwha has announced a 32MP / 8K camera directly competing with Avigilon's H4 30MP /...
Fingerprints for Access Control Guide on Sep 09, 2019
Users can lose badges, but they never misplace a finger, right? The most common biometric used in access are fingerprints, and it has become one...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact