Dealing with Gaps in Surveillance Coverage

By: John Honovich, Published on Feb 14, 2011

Gaps, or holes, in one's surveillance coverage is a fact of life for most organizations. Unfortunately, it can become a painful fact when incidents occur in areas where surveillance coverage is inadequate or missing. Often, users, management and outside observers cannot understand why this 'mistake' happened. In this note, we examine the key tradeoffs and options involved in dealing and minimizing gaps in surveillance coverage. We conclude with a video screencast to show these principles in action.

A February 2010 article criticizing surveillance in Mumbai rail stations is a good example of the frustration and concern gaps create:

  • "Close-circuit cameras at most stations are fitted at improper angles and do not cover the entire area though the police often bank on CCTV images to solve crimes."
  • "The CCTVs do not move 360 degrees and we get blurry images of offenders. The cameras should move at least 180 degrees. We have complained to the railways many times"

While each site is different and we do not know the details of this case, we can easily examine some general principles that impact surveillance usability:

  • Very Narrow Areas For Clear Face Shots: If you want to capture a clear image of someone's face that can be used to identify a person, even with a 1080p HD camera, the maximum width of your cameras' FoV can be no more than about 30 feet or 10 meters. Unless you are in a very small confined environment everywhere (e.g., a bank branch), delivering such clarity/detail is extremely difficult / expensive. Inevitability, there are going to be areas captured by the camera but too blurry to be capable of identifying an unknown suspect.
  • Restrictions on Camera Placements: Often, you know a certain area needs surveillance but have major logistical barriers placing a camera. This frequently happens when ceilings are very high or there are no walls or poles close by to mount the camera. In those cases, cameras are frequently mounted in areas where it is cheaper / less complex. Additionally, sometimes there are ideal places for mounting cameras but other stakeholders block camera placement for aesthetic reasons.
  • Use of Choke Points: Because it is difficult to capture high quality video everywhere, most organizations focus their coverage on choke points (typically doorways/entranceways) that are relatively narrow and funnel people. Choke points are always a good tool. However, there are 2 common issues:
  • Open Area Challenges: Some facilities, by design, are open areas. Common examples include parks, city centers and smaller rail stations. In these scenarios, there are vey few 'natural' choke points and a high probability that people will enter from many directions. 
  • Tracking Suspect Back to Choke Point: Even if you have a choke point, incidents often occur outside of those choke points. An example is a person entering a stadium and then causing a fight near their seats. While the camera may capture a detailed image of the suspect entering, the video of the fight may be blurry. Tracking that person with a blurry image back to their entrance can be quite difficult.

For all of those reasons, depending on fixed surveillance cameras to saturate your grounds is a difficult proposition. Indeed, this explains the motivation and the frequent use of PTZ (controllable) cameras.

On the one hand, someone could argue that a PTZ has no gaps because when controlled it can capture in any direction over great distances (see our note on how far a PTZ can see). On the other hand, the PTZ is essentially blind in whatever direction it is not currently pointed. This can lead to a false sense of surveillance/security.  See our Should You Use PTZ Cameras? review for an in-depth analysis of PTZ tradeoffs.

In Action

In the video below, we examine a public park camera layout demonstrating the tradeoffs and gaps a surveillance designer faces:

In the video, we referred to our pixels reference chart and used the Pelco camera design tool [link no longer available].

Recommendations on Reducing and Dealing with Gaps

  • Increased resolution is the most powerful new tool to reduce gaps. However, as we demonstrated in the above video, even multi-megapixel video will struggle to eliminate blurry or unclear video over larger areas.
  • Since gaps in coverage are essentially inevitable, this must be communicated up front to key stakeholders so they have appropriate expectations
  • Making clear the risks of potential gaps up front may also help the user to justify spending more money or getting approvals to place cameras in more advantageous locations
Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Terrible Convergint Coronavirus Thermal Camera Recommendation on Apr 01, 2020
A week after Convergint disclosed falling revenue, pay and job cuts,...
Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators on Jul 07, 2020
While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020,...
Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM...
The Problem With Fever Detecting Thermal Sunglasses on Apr 15, 2020
While the media has promoted using thermal sunglasses to detect fevers, this...
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in...
Integrators Hard Hit By Coronavirus on Mar 18, 2020
Integrators are already being hard hit by Coronavirus as brand new IPVM...
Dynamic vs Static IP Addresses Tutorial on Apr 16, 2020
While many cameras default to DHCP out of the box, that does not mean you...
FLIR Markets Windows Temperature Screening, Violates IEC And Causes Performance Problems on Jul 17, 2020
FLIR, one of the largest thermal screening manufacturers, is marketing...
Video Analytics 101 on Mar 16, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
Coronavirus Hits Manufacturers, Standing Now, Worse To Come on Apr 06, 2020
Coronavirus is hitting security manufacturers, though overall modestly for...
Convergint Outlook Turns Negative on Apr 16, 2020
Convergint's outlook has turned negative, according to bond rater Moody's,...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
FDA Gives Guidance on 'Coronavirus' Thermal Fever Detection Systems on Mar 30, 2020
The US FDA has given IPVM guidance on the use of thermal fever detection...

Recent Reports

SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 200 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...
US Startup Fever Inspect Examined on Aug 03, 2020
Undoubtedly late to fever cameras, this US company, Fever Inspect, led by a...
Motorola Solutions Acquires Pelco on Aug 03, 2020
Motorola Solutions has acquired Pelco, pledging to bring blue back and make...
False: Verkada: "If You Want To Remote View Your Cameras You Need To Punch Holes In Your Firewall" on Jul 31, 2020
Verkada falsely declared to “3,000+ customers”, “300 school districts”, and...
US GSA Explains NDAA 889 Part B Blacklisting on Jul 31, 2020
With the 'Blacklist Clause' going into effect August 13 that bans the US...
Access Control Online Show July 2020 - On-Demand Recording of 45+ Manufacturers Presentations on Jul 30, 2020
The show featured 48 Access Control presentations, all now recorded and...
Face Detection Shootout - Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jul 30, 2020
Face detection analytics are available from a number of manufactures...
Sunell is The First China Manufacturer to Market NDAA Compliance on Jul 30, 2020
Most China manufacturers are going to be impacted by the NDAA 'Blacklist...