Deadly Pushbuttons

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on May 15, 2013

A simple and common misunderstanding in specifying pushbuttons can kill people trying to escape burning buildings. Furthermore, determining buttons that are 'safe' versus 'deadly' can be difficult to detect unless you check how they are implemented. We explain this issue and options to resolve inside.

RTE by the Books

**** ********** ****** ******* ******* **** ****** **** ********/ ************* code *****. ** ******* *** ******* ** *** "******* ** **** ********", * ******* ****** ** *** *******. ******* *** ******** authority ** *** *** (************* ******** ****) **** ****.*.*.* **** affirms:

"* ****** ********* ****** (**** ******) ***** ****** ** ****** interruption ** ***** ** *** **** – *********** ** *** access ******* ****** ***********. **** *** **** ****** ** ********, the ***** **** ****** ******** *** ** ******* *******. *** push ****** **** ******* ******* ******* “**** ** ****” *** must ** ******* **” ** **” ********** ***** *** ***** and ****** *’ ** *** *****. ***** ****** **** ** provided ** *** **** ******."

****** ***** *** *** ************ *** *** *** ********:

  • ****** ************:*** *** ********** ****** ** ***** ** ** ***** **** the **** **********, *** **** ***** ***** ** *** **** when ********* (********* ********).
  • ** *******:*** ****** ** **** ******** **** ** **** ** ** seconds.

******* ** ******* **** ***** *** ***** *** ****** ** trapping ****** ****** ** ****** ** * *********.

The ***** **********

** *** ******* **** *****, *** ****** ******* ********* ** using ******** ** ****** * **** ********* *******. *** ******** asked *** ********* ** *** **** ***** '**** ** ****' pushbuttons ******* ** ******** ** *** *** ******** *** ******* as **** ** *** ****** ******. *** ******* ** **** the **** **** ** *********** *********, *** ********* ****** ** use *** ****** ** ***** ** *** ***********, *** *********** the ****** ******** ** **** ***** ** **** ******** ** printed ** ***, *** ********* **** ********* ** *** ****** change.

*** ********* ***** *** ****** ** ********* ***** ** *** maglocks, *** ******* *** ****** ****** ** *** ** **** drop ***** ** *** ******** ** ******** ** ****.

*******, **** ************ ****** * *** ***** ** *** ****: the ******** *****, ** ***** ******** ** *** ******. *** is **** ******** ** ********?

Timing ** **********

** *** ******* *****, *** ******* ***** ***** ** **** as *** ****** ** ******. *******, ** **** ** *** button ** ********, ***** ** ******** ** *** *******, ********* the ****. ******** **** **** ** * ***** *********, ** would **** ******* ******* ******* ******* *** ****** *** ******** the ******** ****, *** **** '**-**', *** **** ***** ****** a **** ******* ** *** ******** *** ******** ** ******* as **** ********* **** * ****** ********* *******.

*** *** ******* **** ** ******* ** * ***** '****' feature ** *** ********. * ****** *** ********** ***** ******* a ********** ** ******** ***** **** ***** ******** ** **** power ** ******** *** * ******* ****** ** ****, ********* 30 *******. **** ****** ******** ****** **** ******* ******* *** button *** ******* ******* *** **** ** ** *********.

Not *** '*** *******' ******* *****

*** ******** ********* ***** ***** *** **** **** *** * variety ** *******; ********* *** **** **** ** *** ********** "door ****" ****** ****** ** *********** *** *** *********** ***** on ******** *** **********, ***** **** ********. ***** ******* *** used ** ******** ********* **** ******* *** ***** *** ***** be **** ** *********** **** ********* ***** ** ***** ****.

*******,******* ******* *** ********* ****** ** *** **** ******. ***** ******* *** ****** when ******** **** ******** ****** ** ***** ******** ********** ******* where * ********* ******* ** ******** ** ******* **** *****. Although ** ********** *********, ***** ******* **** *** **** ******* function ** *** *** **********, *** ***** **** ***** ******** additional ********* ** ***** *** ********** ** *** *** **** in ***** ** ** ****.

Two ***** ** ***** ******

*** ********** ****** *******, *** ******* **** ** ********** ***** typically ***** *** ** *** *****:

  • ********: **** **** ** ****** ******** * ***-******* ** ******* powered ********** ***** ***** **** ******* * ********** ****** ******* before ********* ***** ** *****.
  • *********:***** ****** ******* * ******* *** ** ***-******* ****** **** retracts ** * **** ********. *** *** ******* ******* ** outside ***** ****** ** *** ****** *** ********, *** ********* are ************ *** *** **** ******* ** *** ******** ********.

** ****** ****, *** ****** ** *** ******** ** ** wired ** ** ***** **** * **** ********** ** *** the ****** ******* ****** ** ***** ******* *** ** *******. The *** ******* **** ** ******** ********* ** *** ****, so **** * ************** ****** ****** *********** ***** ****. *** button **** ** ********* ** ** ** ****** ** ********** sever ***** ** *** **** ***** *** ************.

Murky *****, ******** ****

***** *** *** **** ** **** ***** ** *** ************ and ******** ** ***** *******, **** ***** ********** **** ******** the *** *** *** ** **** *******. ********, ***** **** exceptions *** ******** ** ******* *********** ************ (**: ******* ** green "**** ** ****", ******* **** ** ***, ***, *** bi-lingual "****/******" *******) *** **** **** ** ******* *** ******** timed ******* ** *** *** ***********.

*** ** ** ********* ************* ** **** ******* *** *** it ** ** *********, **** **** ***** *********** ****** ****-******* substitutes. ******* ***** ***** ***** ** *** ******** ******* **** enough, ** ** ********* ** ****** ******* ********* *** ********** to ******* * ******* ****** ** *******.

Comments (7)

An email from a member, with concerns about the post:

"It makes no mention of the correct wiring and installation of mag locks and how their power supplies must be attached to an ancillary fire alarm relay.

Secondly, what he also then should have told people is this is exactly why mag locks should NEVER be used.

There are electrified exit devices that can be installed, strikes in the vertical pins, the doors that he shows the picture of on his post, easily could have been retrofitted with Vonduprin Exit devices, a center mullion which could have had electric strikes added to it. This will always allow exit. Mag locks are a menace to this industry and are used by most integrators that do not understand door hardware! If that door is a single door they easily could have added a push paddle with an electric strike and installed a vertical pull handle on the secure side of the door as well.

Thirdly. The button he shows is a handicap door button. These require even more criticality to them. This button is wired to an assist opener. If they wired that button to a mag lock and an assist opener, they are in violation of multiple NFPA and UBC codes."

I think that this article does a good job of describing the code and safety implications of using RTE buttons with electromagnetic locks.

As anyone who has followed my postings or articles knows, I am not a big fan of mag locks, but they can be used safely and effectively when properly installed. I think its as much of a mistake to say to NEVER use them is it is to say to ALWAYS use them. System designers need to have a broad palette of tools to work with and the wisdom to select the right product for each application.

As an aside, door actuator buttons such as the one shown above are often wireless. A wireless transmitter is installed at the button and a wireless receiver at the door opener. This is especially common when the door opener has been added on a retrofit basis rather than as a part of new construction. The use of the surface mounted back box as shown in the photo above is a clue that this could be the case here.

Some security installers see a button and assume that they can use the conduit for the existing button to install cabling for their new card reader. They are disappointed when they take the button off the wall or pedestal and discover that the button is wireless.

In Australia you are required to have two fail safe mechanisms in place to ensure egress can be achieved through an access controlled door that blocks the path of a required exit. The first is that the power to the locking device must be removed on the event of a building fire alarm activation This must be a hardwired signal from the fire detection system which breaks power to the locking device via an interface relay. The second is a break glass release unit installed adjacent to the exit button. This will also break the power connection to the locking device for emergency egress. The locking device must be a fallsafe ( power to lock) device.

Hello, Reader:

Let me take a stab at responding to you point-by-point:

  • "It makes no mention of the correct wiring and installation of mag locks and how their power supplies must be attached to an ancillary fire alarm relay."

That's a good point, and while it isn't a topic covered the post, 2009 IBC Codes (1008.1.9.8.3) require that maglock power drops when the fire alarm system is activated.

  • "Secondly, what he also then should have told people is this is exactly why mag locks should NEVER be used. "

I don't agree that maglocks should never be used. When used/installed properly, maglocks are a reliable and safe method of securing doors. Sometimes the way the opening is constructed leaves no choice but to use maglocks, and unless the local jurisdiction outlaws their use (not uncommon due to the same concerns you have) maglocks could provide decades of trouble-free use in an EAC system.

  • "There are electrified exit devices that can be installed, strikes in the vertical pins, the doors that he shows the picture of on his post, easily could have been retrofitted with Vonduprin Exit devices, a center mullion which could have had electric strikes added to it. This will always allow exit."

I agree that a mechanical hardware egress solution is the best manner to guarantee egress. However, changing hardware for a door can quickly exceed a thousand dollars or more, and an integrator who is prone to improperly install a maglock is sure to botch up installing replacement hardware! In our EAC class, only 20% of the installers/integrators indicated they regularly work with locksmiths, and the skills to install and specify door hardware correctly are out of reach for many. There is no assurance that a Vonduprin exit device will fit every door (ie: Herculite/glass), and frequently other devices must be used by spec.

In general, there are a number of reasons why a mullion could not be installed (code, door modifaction costs, etc) but there are strikes designed to be used with vertical rod exit devices. Unfortunately, vertical rod latches are typically the worst-adjusted components in a door, and they may not guarantee the door is locked even if strikes are installed.

  • Mag locks are a menace to this industry and are used by most integrators that do not understand door hardware! If that door is a single door they easily could have added a push paddle with an electric strike and installed a vertical pull handle on the secure side of the door as well."

There are many AHJs that share your concerns! For example, NY Public Buildings, Houston Texas, and Chicago Schools agree with you and largely prohibit their use. However, extensively modifying door hardware can be very costly and create more life/safety risk than simply using a maglock correctly.

  • "Thirdly. The button he shows is a handicap door button. These require even more criticality to them. This button is wired to an assist opener. If they wired that button to a mag lock and an assist opener, they are in violation of multiple NFPA and UBC codes."

This point is noted in the post. You are very correct, using a handicap push-button is NOT the same as an RTE pushbutton, and interchanging them is illegal! In the theoretical application above, if an opener is used with the door, then maglocks are not likely being used. (In order to deploy maglocks with an opener, they must be sequenced and timed and are factory installed on the unit.) However, I have not found an IBC citation outlawing their use, so if you (or other reader) can help, please respond. Thanks!

Hai Brain,

Which is correct method incase fire alarm activation....

Method 1:

Fire alarm panel integrated with access control panel, incase of fire alarm condition Access control panel will unlock the all access controlled doors

Method 2:

Fire alarm output relay/fire relay module will interrupt the lock power to unlock the door incase of fire alarm. it's ok for one door, if we have many access doors then its required as many fire relay modules to interrupt each access doors....

It has to be method 2. It is not necessary to have a separate relay per door, a 10 amp relay which is wired to a fail safe output from the FIP (or voltage output in some cases) feeding a common power terminal strip which supplies power to each electric locking device is a good solution.

Obviously all electric locking devices must be of a type that require power to lock for this to work.

Thanks Robert.

Usually we mixup of fail safe& fail secure locks...

We are installing the Emergency Break Glass to unlock (power interrupt) the access door locks during emergency (from secure side), additionally this EBG will be monitored through Access control system.

Plus we do integrate with Fire Alarm panel & Access control panel, during fire alarm condition it will unlock the all access doors...

Any suggestion on the above method... or any recommended modification for better life safety...

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Bad: Dahua Villa Video Doorbell Tested on Jan 11, 2019
Doorbells are one of the hottest segments in the residential market but Dahua's Villa Video Doorbell is the worst we have tested.   We bought and...
Wavelynx Access Control Manufacturer Profile on Jan 10, 2019
Denver-based WaveLynx is not well known as an access reader manufacturer, but OEMs for big industry brands including Amag, Isonas (Allegion),...
Managed Video Services UL 827B Examined on Jan 09, 2019
Historically, UL listings for central stations have been important, with UL 827 having widespread support. However, few central stations have...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
DirectView Aims To Be A Video Surveillance Power Like Tyco on Jan 02, 2019
DirectView is a publicly traded US company that tells IPVM that it has ambitions to be the next ADI, Anixter, or even Tyco. In this note, we share...
Combating Vaping Epidemic - Halo Smart Sensor Profile on Dec 21, 2018
Youth vaping has become an epidemic, according to the US Surgeon General, while the market leader, Juul, just received a $12.8 billion investment...
ACRE-Acquired Open Options Access Company Profile on Dec 17, 2018
Who is the company ACRE is acquiring? In this note, we examine Open Options line for best customer fit, key features, pricing, and main...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
2019 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 14, 2019
The new IP Networking Book 2019 is a 285 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
Arecont Costar Layoffs on Jan 14, 2019
Arecont Vision, a Costar Company, has laid off more than 10% of their workforce in a move the company described to IPVM as a result of "important...
The False SCMP Story on Hikvision NYC AI on Jan 14, 2019
In the past week, one of Asia's largest publications, the South China Morning Post (SCMP), posted an article about "Chinese [facial recognition]...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
Bad: Dahua Villa Video Doorbell Tested on Jan 11, 2019
Doorbells are one of the hottest segments in the residential market but Dahua's Villa Video Doorbell is the worst we have tested.   We bought and...
Last Chance - Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact