Dahua Products Are Not GDPR Compliant, No Products Can Be

*** ****** ** **** no ******** *** **, as *** ** **** not '*******' *** ******* products ** '*********'.

** **** ****, ***** on *****+ **** **** *** Video ************ *****, ** ******* **** Dahua ** ***** ****, why ** ** ********** and *** ***** *** other ************* *** ****** support ****.

Announcement *** *****

*** *** ****** *** GDPR’s ******** ************** **** on *** **,***** ************* *** ** ******* and ***** ******** **** DVRs **** “*********” ** “comply **** *** ****” by*Ü**********.***** ******* **** ********* who *** ***** “********* ** ********” ***** now “**** **** ******** [sic]."

Who ** ‘**********’ *****?

*Ü*** * *******, ***-****** company ** ******* **** provides *****-***** ************** *** inspections ** ***** **********. It ** *** **** of *** ** ********** or *** **** *********** mechanism.*Ü**** ************ ****** ** China ** ******* *** revenues (**** ***** ***** media:*** ********* ***** ****** at ***** ******.)

***** ***** ******* ** was *** “***** ** global ***** ************ ********” to ******* **** ************* from*Ü*, ****** ******* ************ manufacturer ******* **** ******* ***** * *** before ********* *** **** ******* TÜV.

'Derived ****' ****, *** ****

*Ü* ********* ********** *** ******* ************* schemes “*** ******* **** *** EU ****,” ****** **** claiming **** ******* ****** proof ** **********, ** they ******.

GDPR *** *************

***** *** **** ********** certification** *** ******* **, ** **** *** include *** ************ **** products ** ********* *** establish *** ****** ********** mechanisms.************, ************* ** ***** for **** *********** *** processors ** **** "******* and *********** ***********" ********* "appropriate **********" - ** is *** ***** *** products.

******* **’* ******* * states **** *** ************* schemes **** ** “********* *** ********* *** a ******* **** ** transparent”. *******, *****’****** ********* ******* ***** ** any ******* ***** ******* how ** ******** ************* plus ** *** **** minimal ******* **** *Ü* itself ** *** ******* and *Ü* *** *** responded ** *** ******** requests *** ******* ** date.

No ****** ** ***** **************

******** *Ü*'************** *** ******* ********* carry ** ***** ****** and ** *** ****** a ****’* ********* ** case ********* **** ***** as******* **’* ******* *********:

False ***** ** ********

** ********* *** ******** GDPR *********, ***** ***** mislead ******* **** ******** they *** ********* ******* the ****’* *********** **** fines.

*** **** ********* ***** ** ** to *% ** ****** revenue*** ********** ***** ** ***** to **** ******** *** rules. ** ********* ** IPVM’s**** *****, ***** ***** *** not ********* ********* *** broader ********** **** ********* authorities **** *****’* * breach ** ********* ****** with ***** ******** **** if *********.

*** ***** *******, **’* not ******** *** * camera ** ** ‘****-*********.’ There *** ****** ** criteria ** ******** ****** to ********* ****. **** is ****** *** ***** reveals ****** ** ******* on ******* *** ***** products *** ****-********* ** the ***** *****.

Other ************ ******

***** ***’* *** **** firm ******* *****-***** **************. For *******,******* ********* **** **** that *** ***** ******* software** “*********” ** “****-*****” b** ******* *** **** cautious ** *** ******, limiting ** ** * specific **** ******* ******* while ******** *** ******* *** ********, ****** *****,**** *** ******** **** “certified ** ****** **** the ****”.

***, ** ********* *****, Uniview ******** *********** *** same ***** ******* **** the **** ******* * day ******.

*******, ***** ** * reason ************* *** ** keen ** ******* ***** certifications. **’* ***** ********* and ********** *******, *** actual ********** **** *** GDPR ******.

What ** **** *** ** ******** ***** ****

******* ** ******** ** ‘certifying’ ******* *****, ** best *** ** ****** you *** ********* **** the **** ** ** ask * *** ***** questions **** **:

• **** *** ******* ******* cybersecurity **** ********* *** encryption ******** ** ****** personal **** ******** *** avoided? (*** **** ********** ******* ****** ******’* ******** data ***’* ***********. ***** has * ******* ******* *****, ********* *** ** recently ****** *********, ***** * ******** allowing ****** ************ ***** access *** *********** *** ****** *******.)
• ** *** ******* **** be ********* ***** ******* of ****** ***************, **** it **** **** ********/******* technology ************? (*** **** ********** “****************”** ***** ********** ** best ****** *******’ *******. This ********** ** *** a ****** ******* ** Dahua *******.)
• ** **** ** * personal **** ******, ** there * ****** ** inform *********** *** ******* as **** ** ******** informed? (**** ********** **** inform ******* “******* ***** *****” ***** ******** ***** of * ******** **** breach. ***** ********** ************* ************ ******** *****.)
• ** ***** * ********** public ******** **** ****** recognition ** ***** ********* techniques *** ***** ****? (Biometric ************* ********** **** * few ********* **********.***** ** **** ******* ** ****** recognition*** ************* **** * *** reporter ******* ******* * Chinese **** ** * minutes ** * *************.)

*********** *** *** ***** should ****** ********* **** they ******* **** ******* to *** ********* *****. It **** *** ****** if ***** *** “****-*********” by *******.

Update, *** **:***** **** **** *** published, **** ***** *** following **** ** ********* that ***** *** ****, certification ** ******** *** data *********** *** ********** rather **** ****** ********:

"************, ************* ** ***** for **** *********** *** processors ** **** '******* and *********** ***********' ********* 'appropriate **********' - ** is *** ***** *** products."

******, *** **:*********** *** ** ***** blast ** *********** ******** ** ***** the "*****" ** ** certified ** *Ü* ** its *****.