Dahua Attacks Hikvision

Author: John Honovich, Published on Dec 26, 2014

Things are getting ugly between the two biggest surveillance manufacturers in the world.

Both companies have skyrocketed largely driven by monster domestic projects and are increasingly targeting the Western world.

*****, *** ******* ** *** *** ******, ** *** ******* up *** **** ******* *********.

** **** ****, ** ******* *** ****** ** ***** ******* and ********* ******* ***** ** ********.

Analog ** ***** *******

***** **** ***** ****** **,***, ** ********, ****** **** **** *** **** **** ** show *** ***** ** **** *******, ******* ********* ******** *** confirmation **** **** ***** **** ******.

** *** ****** ******* **** ***** *** ** ******* ******* for *** ** *** **. *******, ** ** ******* ***** are **** ** *****. *******, **** **** ******* ** ** unclear.

******: ***** ****** ** ******* ****** / ************

**** *** * ****** ******* ** ***** ** ***** ** Analog **. **** * ** **** ** *******, *** ***** 2 *** ***********:

****, **** ********'* ******* ** *** *****'* ******* / ************ ** *****.

****, ** *** *** ******* **** *********** **** ***** *** from * ***** *****.

******

***** ******** **** **** ******** ******** ******, ******** *** ****** of ***** ********* ** ***** ******** ** *** **** ********. Here ** ** ******* ** *** **** *****:

"** *** ********** ** ****** ******* ************ ** **** **********‘* similar ********** (*.*. ********* **-*** ) ***** ****** **** ** without *************.

** ** ***, *** ***** ******** *** *** ******* **-*** in *** ****** *** **** ** ** *** *******."

****, ** **** *****, **** ******* **** ********* *** ****** HDCVI, * ***** ****** ***** *** *******'* ****** ** ****** secret.

******* **** ***** ***** **** * ***** ***, ** **** no ********** **** *** ********** *** **** *****.

***** *** *************

**** *** ******** ******* **** ***** *********** (*** ******* ****** *****) *********** (*** ******* ****** ***):

**** ******* *** ********* ***** **** ** ******** ********* ** any ******** ****** **** **** *** ********* ** *** ***** that **** **** **** *** ********* *****'* *******.

********* *********** ******

*********, *** ********* ** ***** *** ******** ** ********* *** others, ************* ****** *****'* *******:

"*) *****'* ****** *** ******** *** **** *) ** **** continue ** ******* *** ********* *** ******** ** **** *** we *** **** ***** ******* ******* **** *** *******."

Espionage ***********

***** ****** *** ** *** **** ******* ***** ******** ****, titled, "** ********** ********* ******* ****** ** *****", **** *** *** *****:

"****** *** *************, *** ******* ********* **** ** ************* ** *****’* ***** ********** ** ******* ******* ************ ********** ** ***** **********." (******** *****)

*****'* ******** ******* **** *** '***' *** **** **** ********* (e.g., *****'* ***** ********** ** *****).

** ***** ***** *** *** ******** ********** *** ********* ****** (police ******, ***.). **** **** **** *** ** *** ***** not ***** **.

** ***** ***** ** ********* *** *** ******* *** '**********' this, *** **** ******* ** ******* ** **** ****, **** though **** **** **** ******** ****** ****** ** ** ********* because ** *** ***** ***** *** *******.

*******, **** **** *****'* *** *******, ** ** *** ***** if **** '***' *** ******** ******* ** ********* ** *** crime.

***********, ***** ******* ******* ** ****** ********* **** **** *********.

Dahua - ***********?

******* ** *** ***** ******** *** ********* ****** ***** ******* claims, **** **** ***** ******* *** *********. **** ** ***** whatsoever, * ****** ******* ***** *******, ***** ******* **** ***** and ******* ***** *******, **** ******* ** ** * ********* and ******* ******* ** ******** *********.

**** *** **** ***** *** ** **** **, **** ****** surely ******* **.

The ***** *****

**********, **** ** ****** *** ***** **** ** **** ***** and ********* **** ** ******* ******** ** **** **** ** win *** ****.

***** **** ***** ******** ******** ***** **** ** ********* ** developing *** **** ******** *** **** ** *** ******.

****** ** ** ***** **** **** **** ** ********** *** Western ****** *******. *** * ******* ******* ******* ***** *** Hikvision ** ****** **, **** ************ ********* *** ******* ** litigation, **** **** **** ****. ******* ************* **** ***** ********* both ** ********* *** ******* ***********, *** *** ***** *** those ** ********* ****** **, ******** ** *** **** ** standards *** *** **** ** ********.

* ***** ** **** ****** *** ** ***** *** ********* seriously *** ** ****, **** **** ** **** ******** *****.

Comments (20)

This subject is too funny. Dahua is acting like a petulant child with its wild and unsubstantiated accusations and threats. It's almost as if Todd has his hand in this.

Related, Todd Rockoff is cited in the Techpoint legal letter. Not sure why they brought him up.

For other's background, Todd Rockoff is the head of the HDcctv Alliance, a failed trade organization that Dahua is now the main sponsor of, holding 50% of the seats on the Board of Directors.

I doubt Dahua is taking advice on these matters from Rockoff. However, the same incompetence / naivete that lead to them taking over the worthless HDcctv Alliance shows in their efforts here.

Todd Rockoff is cited in the Techpoint legal letter.

Except they couldn't even spell his name correctly (Rochoff). It must be at least slightly annoying to Todd that his benefactors can't spell his name properly <chuckle>.

Except they couldn't even spell his name correctly (Rochoff).

Rockoff may be only a stage name; Traveling celebrities often use another to avoid stalkers and frenzied mobs. ;)

Spying? Who needs that when you can routinely buy source codes on either company's products on internet if you know some Chinese. Ex or current employees regularly sell the stuff on China's "underground" internet.

Although they did give fair warning...

Time will show that all competitors will demise against the east. Do you really think Hikvision or Dahua is here to play? Eventually they will distribute the technology in demand from all markets.

Goodbye UTC, Tyco...better change your strategy. Change is in the air.

And on that note, Merry Christmas Frank :(

I don't know about all but I think it's going to be extremely hard for OEMs, like Interlogix/UTC, to maintain competitiveness as big Chinese companies develop their own direct sales in the West.

Update: We have added in links to Dahua's patent / applications for Analog HD in China.

Plus, here is Google's listing of all Dahua's patents / applications in China.

This previously issued statement from Techpoint bears re-examination in light of recent events.

"We implemented TVI very differently from CVI specifically to work around the CVI patents and even improve the performances. For example, we implemented some special methods so that our 1080P30 transmission is the same as our 720P30 transmission and thus is superior to CVI's transmission at 1080P30. And yes, we are actually looking into several patents for TVI currently."

Assuming that the Rockoff arranged site visit(s) also occurred anywhere around or during this development time, it's only natural that Dahua's has some concern.

Developing 'new' technology to 'work around' an existing patented one is tricky business, as it's hard to tell how broadly a future court may interpret the original claim. The safest course is to work with the original holder see what they view as infringing. If this is not possible or desirable then one (in the U.S.) can ask the court to pre-emptively rule.

"Then one (in the U.S.) can ask the court to pre-emptively rule."

It's a Chinese only patent.

Right. Should have been "in the U.S. at least".

In the 'People's Court' they have similar remedies available:

... the conditions for acceptance of declaratory judgment actions are those set forth in Articles 108 and 111 of the Civil Procedure Law, i.e., "the plaintiff has a direct interest in the case; there is a definite defendant; there are specific claims and causes for the suit; and the suit is within the scope of acceptance for civil actions by the people's court and under the jurisdiction of the people's court where the suit is entertained".

Entertaining. Not Chinese-specific behavior IMO. Think door look conglomerates. Kinda interesting the stories aren't smoother or more well packaged, regardless of their validity.

Has anyone actually tried TVI with CVI equipment and vice versa yet?

i remember seeing that CVI and AHD are about as compatible as NTSC is with PAL, meaning not much, but I don't think IPVM has published any CVI/TVI crosswiring results.

Not looking for a comprehensive test or anything, just a simple, "Yeah, we tried it. It don't work at all." would be fine. :)

It does not work. Beyond that, neither side has never claimed that it would. Now, maybe someone builds a special TVI /CVI combo receiver / encoder but that does not exist today.

Thanks.

Minor point being if Techpoint had just copied CVI it might work.

Of course they could easily change a frequency or interval timing, but since these technologies are all QAM Analog variants and they are all gunning for the longest coax transmission possible, there are only so many feasible variations.* So it's not unthinkable that there would be some accidental interoperability, like seen between AHD and CVI. But it's easy to test if you have the equip, so thanks!

Other point, it seemed as though Dahua was going to play nice back in July, but maybe this 'free' offer was not actually free:

Dahua’s strategy is, therefore, aimed to maximize the return on our investment in HDCVI and in doing so make the technology readily available to other manufacturers – even our direct competitors... Dahua’s policy is as follows: semiconductor manufacturers implementing the HDcctv AT 2.0 standard independently are asked to pay a license fee on a RAND basis, while HDCVI licenses for implementing the HDcctv AT 2.0 standard are open free of charge to authorized equipment makers, per the HDcctv Alliance Members I.P. Agreement to which Dahua are a signatory.

*Unlike digital transmission of course where would only need flip a bit here or there to make the stream totally unreadable.

Dahua and Hikvision are both, in part, owned by the Zhejiang Provincial government and both company's HQ's are located in Hangzhou - dubbed "the Silicon Valley of China". As such, I'd be highly skeptical that any legal action would be taken regardless of the public threats. Not only because of the connected nature of the companies - but also the intentional complexity of IP (Intellectual Property) laws in China and the lack of due process in the legal system.

A bit off topic, but I wanted to share. A great article that explains how China's government promotes corruption for small to medium sized enterprises, and then leverages that against companies once they become large enough to impact the government.

From the article:

"The key to understanding why is something I came up with and call the catch;

1) In China, corruption is allowed where it can be monitored, controlled, and won’t interfere with business.

2) If a business grows to the point where it has the potential to negatively impact the interests of the state, then corruption is imposed, whether or not it will interfere with business."

The key take away with regards to this thread and to buying Chinese products is this: understand that any company like Hikvision or Dahua that have a significant scale are answering directly to the Chinese government.

Tony, couple of points, do you have any idea of the actual percent ownership by the P.R.O.C of Dahua in particular? Unlike HIK, where I was able to see that they were or were recently about 50% owned by the state, Dahua is not so easy to find for me.

Also, I would assume that by your logic, that the state will not let Hikua actually engage in any damaging litigation, instead telling both of them to drop it. Do you agree?

Finally, what does this bode for Uniview? Since they are owned by a U.S. Company, they might get the short end of the stick, no?

I don't have any idea - but in general when China began expanding economically State Owned Enterprises (SOE's) were abandoned in favor of Joint Ventures between the local governments of each province or city. So assuming that both Hikvision and Dahua received startup funding - either via tax incentives, build-to-lease land and factory structures, or just straight up cash - from the Zhejiang government I would assume their ownership structures would be similar.

With regards to Uniview - I honestly have very little knowledge about them. Never heard of them - and that's saying something as I previously worked with UTC Fire & Security (Lenel) in China for 4 years and we competed regularly with the stalworts of the security industry in China. Assuming they are a WFOE (Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise) - which may or may not be the case at it appears they were purchased by Bain Capital Asia Fund in December of 2012 - they would still fall under many of the legal restrictions imposed on local companies. WFOE's operate in the same way as local companies with China's joining of the WTO in 2001 - they just require a significantly higher level of investment upon founding. As this was an acquisition, my guess is that Bain Capital already had a WFOE or joint-venture founded in China - and so the acquisition probably did not materially change the legal structure of Uniview, which I assume was founded as a local enterprise.

So in short - being a WFOE doesn't necessarily mean you will get the short end of the stick. It all depends.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
The False SCMP Story on Hikvision NYC AI on Jan 14, 2019
In the past week, one of Asia's largest publications, the South China Morning Post (SCMP), posted an article about "Chinese [facial recognition]...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
Infinova Deletes Xinjiang References, Hiding Evidence on Jan 07, 2019
Infinova has deleted all posts about Xinjiang on its website due to IPVM’s investigation of its business ties there and successfully directed...
"At Hikvision, We Build Trust" on Jan 03, 2019
Hikvision has joined a growing number of video surveillance manufacturers marketing their trustworthiness. In a recent trade magazine full page...
ASCMA / Moni Problems Deepen, Lenders Terminate Support Agreement on Dec 28, 2018
Ascent Capital Group, aka ASCMA, currently branded Brinks Home Security, formerly known as Moni and Monitronics faces a troubling end to a rocky...
US Gov China Ban Rules Process, SIA Lobbies Against 'Blacklisting', For 'Risk-Based Protocol' on Dec 27, 2018
Details have emerged about when the rules implementing the federal ban on Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei and others will be made public for official...
Network Cable Shootout - Belden, Commscope, Hikvision, Honeywell, NavePoint CCA, Windy City Wire on Dec 17, 2018
Every IP camera install needs UTP cabling. But how much of a difference is there between dirt cheap generic cables found online and the bigger,...
Hikvision Government Parent Holds Communist Party Congress on Dec 17, 2018
The Communist Party committee of Hikvision’s government parent, CETHIK, held a Party Congress earlier this month where senior executives, including...
Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference 2018 Review - ADT, Resideo, Alarm.com, Arlo, Eagle Eye, ACRE, More on Dec 14, 2018
Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference is an event matching industry executives with financiers that frequently leads to future funding...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP reported that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact