Dahua Attacks Hikvision

By: John Honovich, Published on Dec 26, 2014

Things are getting ugly between the two biggest surveillance manufacturers in the world.

Both companies have skyrocketed largely driven by monster domestic projects and are increasingly targeting the Western world.

*****, *** ******* ** the *** ******, ** now ******* ** *** heat ******* *********.

** **** ****, ** examine *** ****** ** legal ******* *** ********* charges ***** ** ********.

Analog ** ***** *******

***** **** ***** ****** HD,***, ** ********, ****** they **** *** **** able ** **** *** proof ** **** *******, despite ********* ******** *** confirmation **** **** ***** send ******.

** *** ****** ******* that ***** *** ** granted ******* *** *** in *** **. *******, we ** ******* ***** are **** ** *****. However, **** **** ******* of ** *******.

******: ***** ****** ** Chinese ****** / ************

**** *** * ****** filings ** ***** ** China ** ****** **. Only * ** **** is *******, *** ***** 2 *** ***********:

****, **** ********'* ******* ** *** Dahua's ******* / ************ in *****.

****, ** *** *** receive **** *********** **** Dahua *** **** * third *****.

******

***** ******** **** **** emailing ******** ******, ******** the ****** ** ***** Hikvision ** ***** ******** to *** **** ********. Here ** ** ******* of *** **** *****:

"** *** ********** ** action ******* ************ ** some **********‘* ******* ********** (I.e. ********* **-*** ) which ****** **** ** without *************.** ** ***, *** their ******** *** *** selling **-*** ** *** market *** **** ** in *** *******."

****, ** **** *****, they ******* **** ********* had ****** *****, * weird ****** ***** *** partner's ****** ** ****** secret.

******* **** ***** ***** from * ***** ***, we **** ** ********** that *** ********** *** been *****.

***** *** *************

**** *** ******** ******* from ***** *********** (*** ******* ****** HDTVI) *********** (*** ******* ****** AHD):

**** ******* *** ********* vague **** ** ******** reference ** *** ******** patent **** **** *** violating ** *** ***** that **** **** **** are ********* *****'* *******.

********* *********** ******

*********, *** ********* ** HDTVI *** ******** ** Hikvision *** ******, ************* denied *****'* *******:

"*) *****'* ****** *** baseless *** **** *) If **** ******** ** disturb *** ********* *** channels ** **** *** we *** **** ***** actions ******* **** *** damages."

Espionage ***********

***** ****** *** ** the **** ******* ***** releases ****, ******, "** Commercial ********* ******* ****** in ***** [**** ** longer *********]", **** *** key *****:

"****** *** *************, *** suspect ********* **** ** was********** ** *****’* ***** competitor ** ******* ******* ************ ********** of ***** **********." (******** added)

*****'* ******** ******* **** the '***' *** **** from ********* (*.*., *****'* major ********** ** *****).

** ***** ***** *** any ******** ********** *** espionage ****** (****** ******, etc.). **** **** **** had ** *** ***** not ***** **.

** ***** ***** ** Hikvision *** *** ******* who '**********' ****, *** they ******* ** ******* or **** ****, **** though **** **** **** industry ****** ****** ** is ********* ******* ** how ***** ***** *** release.

*******, **** **** *****'* own *******, ** ** not ***** ** **** 'spy' *** ******** ******* or ********* ** *** crime.

***********, ***** ******* ******* to ****** ********* **** this *********.

Dahua - ***********?

******* ** *** ***** actually *** ********* ****** their ******* ******, **** have ***** ******* *** execution. **** ** ***** whatsoever, * ****** ******* press *******, ***** ******* over ***** *** ******* legal *******, **** ******* to ** * ********* and ******* ******* ** defaming *********.

**** *** **** ***** and ** **** **, they ****** ****** ******* it.

The ***** *****

**********, **** ** ****** sad ***** **** ** that ***** *** ********* need ** ******* ******** if **** **** ** win *** ****.

***** **** ***** ******** presence ***** **** ** advantage ** ********** *** cost ******** *** **** is *** ******.

****** ** ** ***** very **** **** ** overcoming *** ******* ****** leaders. *** * ******* rivalry ******* ***** *** Hikvision ** ****** **, with ************ ********* *** threats ** **********, **** hurt **** ****. ******* manufacturers **** ***** ********* both ** ********* *** channel ***********, *** *** cause *** ***** ** discredit ****** **, ******** on *** **** ** standards *** *** **** of ********.

* ***** ** **** happen *** ** ***** and ********* ********* *** to ****, **** **** to **** ******** *****.

Comments (20)

This subject is too funny. Dahua is acting like a petulant child with its wild and unsubstantiated accusations and threats. It's almost as if Todd has his hand in this.

Related, Todd Rockoff is cited in the Techpoint legal letter. Not sure why they brought him up.

For other's background, Todd Rockoff is the head of the HDcctv Alliance, a failed trade organization that Dahua is now the main sponsor of, holding 50% of the seats on the Board of Directors.

I doubt Dahua is taking advice on these matters from Rockoff. However, the same incompetence / naivete that lead to them taking over the worthless HDcctv Alliance shows in their efforts here.

Todd Rockoff is cited in the Techpoint legal letter.

Except they couldn't even spell his name correctly (Rochoff). It must be at least slightly annoying to Todd that his benefactors can't spell his name properly <chuckle>.

Except they couldn't even spell his name correctly (Rochoff).

Rockoff may be only a stage name; Traveling celebrities often use another to avoid stalkers and frenzied mobs. ;)

Spying? Who needs that when you can routinely buy source codes on either company's products on internet if you know some Chinese. Ex or current employees regularly sell the stuff on China's "underground" internet.

Although they did give fair warning...

Time will show that all competitors will demise against the east. Do you really think Hikvision or Dahua is here to play? Eventually they will distribute the technology in demand from all markets.

Goodbye UTC, Tyco...better change your strategy. Change is in the air.

And on that note, Merry Christmas Frank :(

I don't know about all but I think it's going to be extremely hard for OEMs, like Interlogix/UTC, to maintain competitiveness as big Chinese companies develop their own direct sales in the West.

Update: We have added in links to Dahua's patent / applications for Analog HD in China.

Plus, here is Google's listing of all Dahua's patents / applications in China.

This previously issued statement from Techpoint bears re-examination in light of recent events.

"We implemented TVI very differently from CVI specifically to work around the CVI patents and even improve the performances. For example, we implemented some special methods so that our 1080P30 transmission is the same as our 720P30 transmission and thus is superior to CVI's transmission at 1080P30. And yes, we are actually looking into several patents for TVI currently."

Assuming that the Rockoff arranged site visit(s) also occurred anywhere around or during this development time, it's only natural that Dahua's has some concern.

Developing 'new' technology to 'work around' an existing patented one is tricky business, as it's hard to tell how broadly a future court may interpret the original claim. The safest course is to work with the original holder see what they view as infringing. If this is not possible or desirable then one (in the U.S.) can ask the court to pre-emptively rule.

"Then one (in the U.S.) can ask the court to pre-emptively rule."

It's a Chinese only patent.

Right. Should have been "in the U.S. at least".

In the 'People's Court' they have similar remedies available:

... the conditions for acceptance of declaratory judgment actions are those set forth in Articles 108 and 111 of the Civil Procedure Law, i.e., "the plaintiff has a direct interest in the case; there is a definite defendant; there are specific claims and causes for the suit; and the suit is within the scope of acceptance for civil actions by the people's court and under the jurisdiction of the people's court where the suit is entertained".

Entertaining. Not Chinese-specific behavior IMO. Think door look conglomerates. Kinda interesting the stories aren't smoother or more well packaged, regardless of their validity.

Has anyone actually tried TVI with CVI equipment and vice versa yet?

i remember seeing that CVI and AHD are about as compatible as NTSC is with PAL, meaning not much, but I don't think IPVM has published any CVI/TVI crosswiring results.

Not looking for a comprehensive test or anything, just a simple, "Yeah, we tried it. It don't work at all." would be fine. :)

It does not work. Beyond that, neither side has never claimed that it would. Now, maybe someone builds a special TVI /CVI combo receiver / encoder but that does not exist today.

Thanks.

Minor point being if Techpoint had just copied CVI it might work.

Of course they could easily change a frequency or interval timing, but since these technologies are all QAM Analog variants and they are all gunning for the longest coax transmission possible, there are only so many feasible variations.* So it's not unthinkable that there would be some accidental interoperability, like seen between AHD and CVI. But it's easy to test if you have the equip, so thanks!

Other point, it seemed as though Dahua was going to play nice back in July, but maybe this 'free' offer was not actually free:

Dahua’s strategy is, therefore, aimed to maximize the return on our investment in HDCVI and in doing so make the technology readily available to other manufacturers – even our direct competitors... Dahua’s policy is as follows: semiconductor manufacturers implementing the HDcctv AT 2.0 standard independently are asked to pay a license fee on a RAND basis, while HDCVI licenses for implementing the HDcctv AT 2.0 standard are open free of charge to authorized equipment makers, per the HDcctv Alliance Members I.P. Agreement to which Dahua are a signatory.

*Unlike digital transmission of course where would only need flip a bit here or there to make the stream totally unreadable.

Dahua and Hikvision are both, in part, owned by the Zhejiang Provincial government and both company's HQ's are located in Hangzhou - dubbed "the Silicon Valley of China". As such, I'd be highly skeptical that any legal action would be taken regardless of the public threats. Not only because of the connected nature of the companies - but also the intentional complexity of IP (Intellectual Property) laws in China and the lack of due process in the legal system.

A bit off topic, but I wanted to share. A great article that explains how China's government promotes corruption for small to medium sized enterprises, and then leverages that against companies once they become large enough to impact the government.

From the article:

"The key to understanding why is something I came up with and call the catch;

1) In China, corruption is allowed where it can be monitored, controlled, and won’t interfere with business.

2) If a business grows to the point where it has the potential to negatively impact the interests of the state, then corruption is imposed, whether or not it will interfere with business."

The key take away with regards to this thread and to buying Chinese products is this: understand that any company like Hikvision or Dahua that have a significant scale are answering directly to the Chinese government.

Tony, couple of points, do you have any idea of the actual percent ownership by the P.R.O.C of Dahua in particular? Unlike HIK, where I was able to see that they were or were recently about 50% owned by the state, Dahua is not so easy to find for me.

Also, I would assume that by your logic, that the state will not let Hikua actually engage in any damaging litigation, instead telling both of them to drop it. Do you agree?

Finally, what does this bode for Uniview? Since they are owned by a U.S. Company, they might get the short end of the stick, no?

I don't have any idea - but in general when China began expanding economically State Owned Enterprises (SOE's) were abandoned in favor of Joint Ventures between the local governments of each province or city. So assuming that both Hikvision and Dahua received startup funding - either via tax incentives, build-to-lease land and factory structures, or just straight up cash - from the Zhejiang government I would assume their ownership structures would be similar.

With regards to Uniview - I honestly have very little knowledge about them. Never heard of them - and that's saying something as I previously worked with UTC Fire & Security (Lenel) in China for 4 years and we competed regularly with the stalworts of the security industry in China. Assuming they are a WFOE (Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise) - which may or may not be the case at it appears they were purchased by Bain Capital Asia Fund in December of 2012 - they would still fall under many of the legal restrictions imposed on local companies. WFOE's operate in the same way as local companies with China's joining of the WTO in 2001 - they just require a significantly higher level of investment upon founding. As this was an acquisition, my guess is that Bain Capital already had a WFOE or joint-venture founded in China - and so the acquisition probably did not materially change the legal structure of Uniview, which I assume was founded as a local enterprise.

So in short - being a WFOE doesn't necessarily mean you will get the short end of the stick. It all depends.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,380 reports, 860 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Hikvision USA Refuses [Now In], Dahua USA Drives Forward With "Coronavirus Cameras" on Apr 07, 2020
Both have been federally banned, both sanctioned for human rights abuses but only one - Dahua - is taking aim at the booming "coronavirus cameras"...
Faked Coronavirus Fever Detection, Athena Used Hikvision; Responds - Selling NDAA Compliant Cameras, Pledging 50% Of Profits to Victims on Mar 24, 2020
US company, Athena Security, faked its coronavirus fever detection marketing, faked a customer, faked comments, and is now using Hikvision, IPVM...
ADT: 'Fever' Cameras Are Medical Devices on Jun 15, 2020
While many manufacturers are avoiding admitting their 'fever' cameras are medical devices, ADT has taken a strong and clear position. ADT has...
Sunell Panda Cam Body Temperature Measurement Camera Tested on May 14, 2020
Sunell is far less well known than its gargantuan domestic competitors Dahua and Hikvision but the company's 'Panda Cam' is going head to head...
Dahua Faked Coronavirus Camera Marketing on Apr 01, 2020
Dahua has conducted a coronavirus camera global marketing campaign centered around a faked detection. Now, Dahua has expanded this to the USA,...
Dahua, Hikvision, ZKTeco Face Mask Detection Shootout on Jun 19, 2020
Temperature tablets with face mask detection are one of the hottest trends in the current coronavirus driven market. But how well does face mask...
Intersec 2020 Final Show Report on Jan 21, 2020
IPVM spent all 3 days at the Intersec 2020 show interviewing various companies and finding key trends. We cover: Middle East Enterprise...
US Passes Uyghur Human Rights Law Condemning Mass Surveillance on Jun 18, 2020
The US government has passed the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020, prominently criticizing the PRC government's "gross violations of human...
Hikvision And Dahua Now Blocked From Conforming ONVIF Products on Apr 03, 2020
Dahua and Hikvision, sanctioned for human rights abuses, are now blocked from submitting products for ONVIF conformance, a blow to the mega China...
Pivot3 Mass Layoffs on Mar 27, 2020
Pivot3 has conducted mass layoffs, the culmination of grand hopes, a quarter of a billion dollars in VC funding, and multiple failures to gain...

Most Recent Industry Reports

ZeroEyes Presents Firearm Detection Video Analytics on Jul 09, 2020
ZeroEyes presented its Firearm detection Video Analytics system at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from ZeroEyes...
Directory of 162 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Jul 09, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers to help you see and research what options are available. There are...
Clinton Public View Monitor (PVM) Mask Detection Tested on Jul 09, 2020
Face mask detection, or more specifically not wearing one, is expanding amidst the pandemic. Clinton Electronics has added this capability to their...
These Florida Real Estate Agents Are Now Selling "SafeCheck USA" Temperature Detectors on Jul 09, 2020
The "Kakon Brothers", William and Nathan, are self-described "south Florida Power Agents specializing in Luxury Real Estate" who "have closed over...
Avigilon ACC Cloud Tested on Jul 08, 2020
Avigilon merged Blue and ACC, adding VSaaS features to its on-premise VMS, offering remote video and health monitoring that was previously limited...
Hikvision's India Dominance Faces Threat on Jul 08, 2020
While Hikvision has become a dominant video surveillance provider in India, recent tension between the governments of India and the PRC is...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020, with Congress members and activists speaking out against it while video...
Sperry West / Alibaba Tablet Temperature Measurement Tested on Jul 07, 2020
In April, we ordered a ~$500 temperature tablet from Alibaba. We set it to the side while doing 18 other temperature screening tests but, after...
Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators on Jul 07, 2020
While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of security systems integrators shows weak sales, opposition to...