Dahua Attacks Hikvision

By: John Honovich, Published on Dec 26, 2014

Things are getting ugly between the two biggest surveillance manufacturers in the world.

Both companies have skyrocketed largely driven by monster domestic projects and are increasingly targeting the Western world.

*****, *** ******* ** the *** ******, ** now ******* ** *** heat ******* *********.

** **** ****, ** examine *** ****** ** legal ******* *** ********* charges ***** ** ********.

Analog ** ***** *******

***** **** ***** ****** HD,***, ** ********, ****** they **** *** **** able ** **** *** proof ** **** *******, despite ********* ******** *** confirmation **** **** ***** send ******.

** *** ****** ******* that ***** *** ** granted ******* *** *** in *** **. *******, we ** ******* ***** are **** ** *****. However, **** **** ******* of ** *******.

******: ***** ****** ** Chinese ****** / ************

**** *** * ****** filings ** ***** ** China ** ****** **. Only * ** **** is *******, *** ***** 2 *** ***********:

****, **** ********'* ******* ** *** Dahua's ******* / ************ in *****.

****, ** *** *** receive **** *********** **** Dahua *** **** * third *****.

******

***** ******** **** **** emailing ******** ******, ******** the ****** ** ***** Hikvision ** ***** ******** to *** **** ********. Here ** ** ******* of *** **** *****:

"** *** ********** ** action ******* ************ ** some **********‘* ******* ********** (I.e. ********* **-*** ) which ****** **** ** without *************.

** ** ***, *** their ******** *** *** selling **-*** ** *** market *** **** ** in *** *******."

****, ** **** *****, they ******* **** ********* had ****** *****, * weird ****** ***** *** partner's ****** ** ****** secret.

******* **** ***** ***** from * ***** ***, we **** ** ********** that *** ********** *** been *****.

***** *** *************

**** *** ******** ******* from ***** *********** (*** ******* ****** HDTVI) *********** (*** ******* ****** AHD):

**** ******* *** ********* vague **** ** ******** reference ** *** ******** patent **** **** *** violating ** *** ***** that **** **** **** are ********* *****'* *******.

********* *********** ******

*********, *** ********* ** HDTVI *** ******** ** Hikvision *** ******, ************* denied *****'* *******:

"*) *****'* ****** *** baseless *** **** *) If **** ******** ** disturb *** ********* *** channels ** **** *** we *** **** ***** actions ******* **** *** damages."

Espionage ***********

***** ****** *** ** the **** ******* ***** releases ****, ******, "** ********** ********* ******* Caught ** *****", **** *** *** claim:

"****** *** *************, *** suspect ********* **** ** was********** ** *****’* ***** competitor ** ******* ******* ************ ********** of ***** **********." (******** added)

*****'* ******** ******* **** the '***' *** **** from ********* (*.*., *****'* major ********** ** *****).

** ***** ***** *** any ******** ********** *** espionage ****** (****** ******, etc.). **** **** **** had ** *** ***** not ***** **.

** ***** ***** ** Hikvision *** *** ******* who '**********' ****, *** they ******* ** ******* or **** ****, **** though **** **** **** industry ****** ****** ** is ********* ******* ** how ***** ***** *** release.

*******, **** **** *****'* own *******, ** ** not ***** ** **** 'spy' *** ******** ******* or ********* ** *** crime.

***********, ***** ******* ******* to ****** ********* **** this *********.

Dahua - ***********?

******* ** *** ***** actually *** ********* ****** their ******* ******, **** have ***** ******* *** execution. **** ** ***** whatsoever, * ****** ******* press *******, ***** ******* over ***** *** ******* legal *******, **** ******* to ** * ********* and ******* ******* ** defaming *********.

**** *** **** ***** and ** **** **, they ****** ****** ******* it.

The ***** *****

**********, **** ** ****** sad ***** **** ** that ***** *** ********* need ** ******* ******** if **** **** ** win *** ****.

***** **** ***** ******** presence ***** **** ** advantage ** ********** *** cost ******** *** **** is *** ******.

****** ** ** ***** very **** **** ** overcoming *** ******* ****** leaders. *** * ******* rivalry ******* ***** *** Hikvision ** ****** **, with ************ ********* *** threats ** **********, **** hurt **** ****. ******* manufacturers **** ***** ********* both ** ********* *** channel ***********, *** *** cause *** ***** ** discredit ****** **, ******** on *** **** ** standards *** *** **** of ********.

* ***** ** **** happen *** ** ***** and ********* ********* *** to ****, **** **** to **** ******** *****.

Comments (20)

This subject is too funny. Dahua is acting like a petulant child with its wild and unsubstantiated accusations and threats. It's almost as if Todd has his hand in this.

Related, Todd Rockoff is cited in the Techpoint legal letter. Not sure why they brought him up.

For other's background, Todd Rockoff is the head of the HDcctv Alliance, a failed trade organization that Dahua is now the main sponsor of, holding 50% of the seats on the Board of Directors.

I doubt Dahua is taking advice on these matters from Rockoff. However, the same incompetence / naivete that lead to them taking over the worthless HDcctv Alliance shows in their efforts here.

Todd Rockoff is cited in the Techpoint legal letter.

Except they couldn't even spell his name correctly (Rochoff). It must be at least slightly annoying to Todd that his benefactors can't spell his name properly <chuckle>.

Except they couldn't even spell his name correctly (Rochoff).

Rockoff may be only a stage name; Traveling celebrities often use another to avoid stalkers and frenzied mobs. ;)

Spying? Who needs that when you can routinely buy source codes on either company's products on internet if you know some Chinese. Ex or current employees regularly sell the stuff on China's "underground" internet.

Although they did give fair warning...

Time will show that all competitors will demise against the east. Do you really think Hikvision or Dahua is here to play? Eventually they will distribute the technology in demand from all markets.

Goodbye UTC, Tyco...better change your strategy. Change is in the air.

And on that note, Merry Christmas Frank :(

I don't know about all but I think it's going to be extremely hard for OEMs, like Interlogix/UTC, to maintain competitiveness as big Chinese companies develop their own direct sales in the West.

Update: We have added in links to Dahua's patent / applications for Analog HD in China.

Plus, here is Google's listing of all Dahua's patents / applications in China.

This previously issued statement from Techpoint bears re-examination in light of recent events.

"We implemented TVI very differently from CVI specifically to work around the CVI patents and even improve the performances. For example, we implemented some special methods so that our 1080P30 transmission is the same as our 720P30 transmission and thus is superior to CVI's transmission at 1080P30. And yes, we are actually looking into several patents for TVI currently."

Assuming that the Rockoff arranged site visit(s) also occurred anywhere around or during this development time, it's only natural that Dahua's has some concern.

Developing 'new' technology to 'work around' an existing patented one is tricky business, as it's hard to tell how broadly a future court may interpret the original claim. The safest course is to work with the original holder see what they view as infringing. If this is not possible or desirable then one (in the U.S.) can ask the court to pre-emptively rule.

"Then one (in the U.S.) can ask the court to pre-emptively rule."

It's a Chinese only patent.

Right. Should have been "in the U.S. at least".

In the 'People's Court' they have similar remedies available:

... the conditions for acceptance of declaratory judgment actions are those set forth in Articles 108 and 111 of the Civil Procedure Law, i.e., "the plaintiff has a direct interest in the case; there is a definite defendant; there are specific claims and causes for the suit; and the suit is within the scope of acceptance for civil actions by the people's court and under the jurisdiction of the people's court where the suit is entertained".

Entertaining. Not Chinese-specific behavior IMO. Think door look conglomerates. Kinda interesting the stories aren't smoother or more well packaged, regardless of their validity.

Has anyone actually tried TVI with CVI equipment and vice versa yet?

i remember seeing that CVI and AHD are about as compatible as NTSC is with PAL, meaning not much, but I don't think IPVM has published any CVI/TVI crosswiring results.

Not looking for a comprehensive test or anything, just a simple, "Yeah, we tried it. It don't work at all." would be fine. :)

It does not work. Beyond that, neither side has never claimed that it would. Now, maybe someone builds a special TVI /CVI combo receiver / encoder but that does not exist today.

Thanks.

Minor point being if Techpoint had just copied CVI it might work.

Of course they could easily change a frequency or interval timing, but since these technologies are all QAM Analog variants and they are all gunning for the longest coax transmission possible, there are only so many feasible variations.* So it's not unthinkable that there would be some accidental interoperability, like seen between AHD and CVI. But it's easy to test if you have the equip, so thanks!

Other point, it seemed as though Dahua was going to play nice back in July, but maybe this 'free' offer was not actually free:

Dahua’s strategy is, therefore, aimed to maximize the return on our investment in HDCVI and in doing so make the technology readily available to other manufacturers – even our direct competitors... Dahua’s policy is as follows: semiconductor manufacturers implementing the HDcctv AT 2.0 standard independently are asked to pay a license fee on a RAND basis, while HDCVI licenses for implementing the HDcctv AT 2.0 standard are open free of charge to authorized equipment makers, per the HDcctv Alliance Members I.P. Agreement to which Dahua are a signatory.

*Unlike digital transmission of course where would only need flip a bit here or there to make the stream totally unreadable.

Dahua and Hikvision are both, in part, owned by the Zhejiang Provincial government and both company's HQ's are located in Hangzhou - dubbed "the Silicon Valley of China". As such, I'd be highly skeptical that any legal action would be taken regardless of the public threats. Not only because of the connected nature of the companies - but also the intentional complexity of IP (Intellectual Property) laws in China and the lack of due process in the legal system.

A bit off topic, but I wanted to share. A great article that explains how China's government promotes corruption for small to medium sized enterprises, and then leverages that against companies once they become large enough to impact the government.

From the article:

"The key to understanding why is something I came up with and call the catch;

1) In China, corruption is allowed where it can be monitored, controlled, and won’t interfere with business.

2) If a business grows to the point where it has the potential to negatively impact the interests of the state, then corruption is imposed, whether or not it will interfere with business."

The key take away with regards to this thread and to buying Chinese products is this: understand that any company like Hikvision or Dahua that have a significant scale are answering directly to the Chinese government.

Tony, couple of points, do you have any idea of the actual percent ownership by the P.R.O.C of Dahua in particular? Unlike HIK, where I was able to see that they were or were recently about 50% owned by the state, Dahua is not so easy to find for me.

Also, I would assume that by your logic, that the state will not let Hikua actually engage in any damaging litigation, instead telling both of them to drop it. Do you agree?

Finally, what does this bode for Uniview? Since they are owned by a U.S. Company, they might get the short end of the stick, no?

I don't have any idea - but in general when China began expanding economically State Owned Enterprises (SOE's) were abandoned in favor of Joint Ventures between the local governments of each province or city. So assuming that both Hikvision and Dahua received startup funding - either via tax incentives, build-to-lease land and factory structures, or just straight up cash - from the Zhejiang government I would assume their ownership structures would be similar.

With regards to Uniview - I honestly have very little knowledge about them. Never heard of them - and that's saying something as I previously worked with UTC Fire & Security (Lenel) in China for 4 years and we competed regularly with the stalworts of the security industry in China. Assuming they are a WFOE (Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise) - which may or may not be the case at it appears they were purchased by Bain Capital Asia Fund in December of 2012 - they would still fall under many of the legal restrictions imposed on local companies. WFOE's operate in the same way as local companies with China's joining of the WTO in 2001 - they just require a significantly higher level of investment upon founding. As this was an acquisition, my guess is that Bain Capital already had a WFOE or joint-venture founded in China - and so the acquisition probably did not materially change the legal structure of Uniview, which I assume was founded as a local enterprise.

So in short - being a WFOE doesn't necessarily mean you will get the short end of the stick. It all depends.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Trump Signs 'Huawei Ban' - Executive Order Targeting Foreign Adversary Technology on May 16, 2019
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order targeting technology provided by 'foreign adversaries', in what is widely being called a...
China PRC Government New National Video Surveillance Standards on May 14, 2019
The People's Republic of China (PRC) government has released a new set of overarching standards for authorities to follow when they install video...
Vivotek Talks About Taiwan, China, Bans, AI And Business Development on May 10, 2019
Vivotek, Taiwan's biggest manufacturer by revenue, did not have a booth at Taiwan's Secutech 2019 (which we are covering). However,...
10 Facial Recognition Providers Review (Secutech) on May 09, 2019
Adding to our 19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled report from ISC West, IPVM focused on facial recognition technology for our Day 2 coverage...
Secutech Taipei 2019 Show Report, Impacted By Expected Hikua Ban on May 08, 2019
IPVM is in Taipei attending SecuTech 2019: The most significant new development at the show is Dahua and Hikvision pulling out after many years...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
Dahua and Hikvision Products Illegally Sold To US Government GSA on May 06, 2019
Dahua and Hikvision products are being widely and illegally sold to the US government GSA. The sellers are falsely claiming these China products to...
Hikvision Global News Report Directory on Apr 30, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...
Amazon Ring Public Subsidy Program Aims To Dominate Residential Security on May 20, 2019
Amazon dominates market after market. Quitely, but increasingly, they are doing so in residential security, through a combination of significant...
LifeSafety Power NetLink Vulnerabilities And Problematic Response on May 20, 2019
'Power supplies' are not devices that many think about when considering vulnerabilities but as more and more devices go 'online', the risks for...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact