Dahua Attacks Hikvision

By John Honovich, Published Dec 26, 2014, 12:00am EST (Info+)

Things are getting ugly between the two biggest surveillance manufacturers in the world.

Both companies have skyrocketed largely driven by monster domestic projects and are increasingly targeting the Western world.

*****, *** ******* ** *** *** giants, ** *** ******* ** *** heat ******* *********.

** **** ****, ** ******* *** analog ** ***** ******* *** ********* charges ***** ** ********.

Analog ** ***** *******

***** **** ***** ****** **,***, ** ********, ****** **** **** not **** **** ** **** *** proof ** **** *******, ******* ********* requests *** ************ **** **** ***** send ******.

** *** ****** ******* **** ***** are ** ******* ******* *** *** in *** **. *******, ** ** believe ***** *** **** ** *****. However, **** **** ******* ** ** unclear.

******: ***** ****** ** ******* ****** / ************

**** *** * ****** ******* ** Dahua ** ***** ** ****** **. Only * ** **** ** *******, the ***** * *** ***********:

****, **** ********'* ******* ** *** *****'* ******* / ************ ** *****.

****, ** *** *** ******* **** information **** ***** *** **** * third *****.

******

***** ******** **** **** ******** ******** people, ******** *** ****** ** ***** Hikvision ** ***** ******** ** *** over ********. **** ** ** ******* of *** **** *****:

"** *** ********** ** ****** ******* infringement ** **** **********‘* ******* ********** (I.e. ********* **-*** ) ***** ****** from ** ******* *************.** ** ***, *** ***** ******** who *** ******* **-*** ** *** market *** **** ** ** *** trouble."

****, ** **** *****, **** ******* that ********* *** ****** *****, * weird ****** ***** *** *******'* ****** to ****** ******.

******* **** ***** ***** **** * month ***, ** **** ** ********** that *** ********** *** **** *****.

***** *** *************

**** *** ******** ******* **** ***** to********* (*** ******* ****** *****) *********** (*** ******* ****** ***):

**** ******* *** ********* ***** **** no ******** ********* ** *** ******** patent **** **** *** ********* ** any ***** **** **** **** **** are ********* *****'* *******.

********* *********** ******

*********, *** ********* ** ***** *** supplier ** ********* *** ******, ************* denied *****'* *******:

"*) *****'* ****** *** ******** *** that *) ** **** ******** ** disturb *** ********* *** ******** ** this *** ** *** **** ***** actions ******* **** *** *******."

Espionage ***********

***** ****** *** ** *** **** unusual ***** ******** ****, ******, "** Commercial ********* ******* ****** ** ***** [link ** ****** *********]", **** *** key *****:

"****** *** *************, *** ******* ********* that ** ************* ** *****’* ***** ********** ** China** ******* ************ ********** ** ***** Technology." (******** *****)

*****'* ******** ******* **** *** '***' was **** **** ********* (*.*., *****'* major ********** ** *****).

** ***** ***** *** *** ******** supporting *** ********* ****** (****** ******, etc.). **** **** **** *** ** but ***** *** ***** **.

** ***** ***** ** ********* *** the ******* *** '**********' ****, *** they ******* ** ******* ** **** this, **** ****** **** **** **** industry ****** ****** ** ** ********* because ** *** ***** ***** *** release.

*******, **** **** *****'* *** *******, it ** *** ***** ** **** 'spy' *** ******** ******* ** ********* of *** *****.

***********, ***** ******* ******* ** ****** Hikvision **** **** *********.

Dahua - ***********?

******* ** *** ***** ******** *** substance ****** ***** ******* ******, **** have ***** ******* *** *********. **** no ***** **********, * ****** ******* press *******, ***** ******* **** ***** and ******* ***** *******, **** ******* to ** * ********* *** ******* attempt ** ******** *********.

**** *** **** ***** *** ** they **, **** ****** ****** ******* it.

The ***** *****

**********, **** ** ****** *** ***** this ** **** ***** *** ********* need ** ******* ******** ** **** want ** *** *** ****.

***** **** ***** ******** ******** ***** them ** ********* ** ********** *** cost ******** *** **** ** *** enough.

****** ** ** ***** **** **** shot ** ********** *** ******* ****** leaders. *** * ******* ******* ******* Dahua *** ********* ** ****** **, with ************ ********* *** ******* ** litigation, **** **** **** ****. ******* manufacturers **** ***** ********* **** ** marketing *** ******* ***********, *** *** cause *** ***** ** ********* ****** HD, ******** ** *** **** ** standards *** *** **** ** ********.

* ***** ** **** ****** *** if ***** *** ********* ********* *** to ****, **** **** ** **** together *****.

Comments (20)

This subject is too funny. Dahua is acting like a petulant child with its wild and unsubstantiated accusations and threats. It's almost as if Todd has his hand in this.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

Related, Todd Rockoff is cited in the Techpoint legal letter. Not sure why they brought him up.

For other's background, Todd Rockoff is the head of the HDcctv Alliance, a failed trade organization that Dahua is now the main sponsor of, holding 50% of the seats on the Board of Directors.

I doubt Dahua is taking advice on these matters from Rockoff. However, the same incompetence / naivete that lead to them taking over the worthless HDcctv Alliance shows in their efforts here.

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

Todd Rockoff is cited in the Techpoint legal letter.

Except they couldn't even spell his name correctly (Rochoff). It must be at least slightly annoying to Todd that his benefactors can't spell his name properly <chuckle>.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 3

Except they couldn't even spell his name correctly (Rochoff).

Rockoff may be only a stage name; Traveling celebrities often use another to avoid stalkers and frenzied mobs. ;)

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Spying? Who needs that when you can routinely buy source codes on either company's products on internet if you know some Chinese. Ex or current employees regularly sell the stuff on China's "underground" internet.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Although they did give fair warning...

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Time will show that all competitors will demise against the east. Do you really think Hikvision or Dahua is here to play? Eventually they will distribute the technology in demand from all markets.

Goodbye UTC, Tyco...better change your strategy. Change is in the air.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

And on that note, Merry Christmas Frank :(

I don't know about all but I think it's going to be extremely hard for OEMs, like Interlogix/UTC, to maintain competitiveness as big Chinese companies develop their own direct sales in the West.

Agree: 3
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Update: We have added in links to Dahua's patent / applications for Analog HD in China.

Plus, here is Google's listing of all Dahua's patents / applications in China.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

This previously issued statement from Techpoint bears re-examination in light of recent events.

"We implemented TVI very differently from CVI specifically to work around the CVI patents and even improve the performances. For example, we implemented some special methods so that our 1080P30 transmission is the same as our 720P30 transmission and thus is superior to CVI's transmission at 1080P30. And yes, we are actually looking into several patents for TVI currently."

Assuming that the Rockoff arranged site visit(s) also occurred anywhere around or during this development time, it's only natural that Dahua's has some concern.

Developing 'new' technology to 'work around' an existing patented one is tricky business, as it's hard to tell how broadly a future court may interpret the original claim. The safest course is to work with the original holder see what they view as infringing. If this is not possible or desirable then one (in the U.S.) can ask the court to pre-emptively rule.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

"Then one (in the U.S.) can ask the court to pre-emptively rule."

It's a Chinese only patent.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Right. Should have been "in the U.S. at least".

In the 'People's Court' they have similar remedies available:

... the conditions for acceptance of declaratory judgment actions are those set forth in Articles 108 and 111 of the Civil Procedure Law, i.e., "the plaintiff has a direct interest in the case; there is a definite defendant; there are specific claims and causes for the suit; and the suit is within the scope of acceptance for civil actions by the people's court and under the jurisdiction of the people's court where the suit is entertained".

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Entertaining. Not Chinese-specific behavior IMO. Think door look conglomerates. Kinda interesting the stories aren't smoother or more well packaged, regardless of their validity.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Has anyone actually tried TVI with CVI equipment and vice versa yet?

i remember seeing that CVI and AHD are about as compatible as NTSC is with PAL, meaning not much, but I don't think IPVM has published any CVI/TVI crosswiring results.

Not looking for a comprehensive test or anything, just a simple, "Yeah, we tried it. It don't work at all." would be fine. :)

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

It does not work. Beyond that, neither side has never claimed that it would. Now, maybe someone builds a special TVI /CVI combo receiver / encoder but that does not exist today.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Thanks.

Minor point being if Techpoint had just copied CVI it might work.

Of course they could easily change a frequency or interval timing, but since these technologies are all QAM Analog variants and they are all gunning for the longest coax transmission possible, there are only so many feasible variations.* So it's not unthinkable that there would be some accidental interoperability, like seen between AHD and CVI. But it's easy to test if you have the equip, so thanks!

Other point, it seemed as though Dahua was going to play nice back in July, but maybe this 'free' offer was not actually free:

Dahua’s strategy is, therefore, aimed to maximize the return on our investment in HDCVI and in doing so make the technology readily available to other manufacturers – even our direct competitors... Dahua’s policy is as follows: semiconductor manufacturers implementing the HDcctv AT 2.0 standard independently are asked to pay a license fee on a RAND basis, while HDCVI licenses for implementing the HDcctv AT 2.0 standard are open free of charge to authorized equipment makers, per the HDcctv Alliance Members I.P. Agreement to which Dahua are a signatory.

*Unlike digital transmission of course where would only need flip a bit here or there to make the stream totally unreadable.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Dahua and Hikvision are both, in part, owned by the Zhejiang Provincial government and both company's HQ's are located in Hangzhou - dubbed "the Silicon Valley of China". As such, I'd be highly skeptical that any legal action would be taken regardless of the public threats. Not only because of the connected nature of the companies - but also the intentional complexity of IP (Intellectual Property) laws in China and the lack of due process in the legal system.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

A bit off topic, but I wanted to share. A great article that explains how China's government promotes corruption for small to medium sized enterprises, and then leverages that against companies once they become large enough to impact the government.

From the article:

"The key to understanding why is something I came up with and call the catch;

1) In China, corruption is allowed where it can be monitored, controlled, and won’t interfere with business.

2) If a business grows to the point where it has the potential to negatively impact the interests of the state, then corruption is imposed, whether or not it will interfere with business."

The key take away with regards to this thread and to buying Chinese products is this: understand that any company like Hikvision or Dahua that have a significant scale are answering directly to the Chinese government.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

Tony, couple of points, do you have any idea of the actual percent ownership by the P.R.O.C of Dahua in particular? Unlike HIK, where I was able to see that they were or were recently about 50% owned by the state, Dahua is not so easy to find for me.

Also, I would assume that by your logic, that the state will not let Hikua actually engage in any damaging litigation, instead telling both of them to drop it. Do you agree?

Finally, what does this bode for Uniview? Since they are owned by a U.S. Company, they might get the short end of the stick, no?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

I don't have any idea - but in general when China began expanding economically State Owned Enterprises (SOE's) were abandoned in favor of Joint Ventures between the local governments of each province or city. So assuming that both Hikvision and Dahua received startup funding - either via tax incentives, build-to-lease land and factory structures, or just straight up cash - from the Zhejiang government I would assume their ownership structures would be similar.

With regards to Uniview - I honestly have very little knowledge about them. Never heard of them - and that's saying something as I previously worked with UTC Fire & Security (Lenel) in China for 4 years and we competed regularly with the stalworts of the security industry in China. Assuming they are a WFOE (Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise) - which may or may not be the case at it appears they were purchased by Bain Capital Asia Fund in December of 2012 - they would still fall under many of the legal restrictions imposed on local companies. WFOE's operate in the same way as local companies with China's joining of the WTO in 2001 - they just require a significantly higher level of investment upon founding. As this was an acquisition, my guess is that Bain Capital already had a WFOE or joint-venture founded in China - and so the acquisition probably did not materially change the legal structure of Uniview, which I assume was founded as a local enterprise.

So in short - being a WFOE doesn't necessarily mean you will get the short end of the stick. It all depends.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts reporting, tutorials and software funded by subscriber's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
Loading Related Reports