Cybersecurity Insurance For Security Integrators

By: Dan Gelinas, Published on Nov 29, 2018

Most security industry professionals carry insurance to cover themselves in the event of a general loss. However, most are not carrying cyber insurance.

Insurers and industry groups IPVM spoke to say it is a 'no-brainer,' however, for integrators that are concerned about the bottom line and may feel that they will not have an issue, this may look like a poor investment.

cybersecurity insurance

In this note, based on our research and interviews we look at:

  • Why have it
  • What are the different types
  • Who offers it
  • How much does it cost
  • Who is endorsing it
  • What reasons against it

**** ******** ******** ************* carry ********* ** ***** themselves ** *** ***** of * ******* ****. However, **** *** *** carrying ***** *********.

******** *** ******** ****** IPVM ***** ** *** it ** * '**-*******,' however, *** *********** **** are ********* ***** *** bottom **** *** *** feel **** **** **** not **** ** *****, this *** **** **** a **** **********.

cybersecurity insurance

** **** ****, ***** on *** ******** *** interviews ** **** **:

  • *** **** **
  • **** *** *** ********* types
  • *** ****** **
  • *** **** **** ** cost
  • *** ** ********* **
  • **** ******* ******* **

[***************]

Why **** ** - ******** **** ***** ****

**** ******** ************* **** to ***** ** ***** general ********* (**) ******** to ******* ***** ******** in *** ***** ** a **** ** ** the ***** **** **** a ******* ** * system *******. *** *******, it ** ****** ** commercial **** ** ******* proof ** *********.

*******, ***** ********* ** not ******* ********* **** security *********** ***** **, though********* *********, ***., *** ** *** insurers **** ***** ****, said **** "***** ** one ** *** ******* growth ***** *** *** of *** ******* ****** areas *** *** ********* industry, *******."

[**** ** ****** *********]

********* ** ****** ********** [link ** ****** *********], Professional ***** ****** *************, * ********* ****** of ***** ******** ** insurance *********, *** ******** a ***** ****** *** get ********* **** *******:

*** ******* ****** **** for ********* ** *** $25-$50 ******* ******* ***** without * ****** ** $650,000. *** ******* **** for * ******* ******** is $***/****. *** ******* cost *** * ******** forensics ****** ** *********** your ****** ** $***/****.

********* ********* ******* ** ************** ***** **** ****** respondents **** * ***** breach ** **** ***** was **********, **** **** not ******** *** *** eventuality.

*******, *********** **** ***** coverage ************ *** ******** to ****** ** ********* of ****** *********:

** ***** *********** **** bigger *******, ***** ******* are ***** ** **** bigger ***** ***** *** they'll ** ******* ***** coverages **** ***** ************.

***** **** [**** ** longer *********] ********* ************* **** **** **** with *** **** ** department *** *** **** stringent ************* **** ********* adherence, *** ******** ******** clicking ** * **** in ** ***** *** undermine * ******* *** open **** ** * breach.

What *** *** ********* *****

*********** **** **** ** is ****** * ******** to ***** ** *** different ***** ** ******** as ****** "*****":

***** ** * *** name *** **. ** matter ***** *** **** is—on ***** ** ** the *****—***’** ***** ****** for **. ********’* ******* on *** ******, *** we **** ****** ****** coming ** **** ****’* about ********.

***** *** ******** * types ** ******** **** fall ***** *** ******* catch-all ******* "*****," ********* to ***********

  • *******
  • *****
  • *******

********** ****:

*** ******* ******* ** media *** **** * teacher ****** * ***** guide ****** *** ** was ** $**,*** ***** because ****** **** *** an ******** ******* *** people ********** ******* *******. A ***** ** ****** had ********** **** ***** guide, ** *** ******* grew.

********* ** *** ******** IPVM ***** **** * good ***** ****** ****** also ***** ****** **** slander, *****, *****************, ********* infringement, *** ****** **** infringement.

Who ****** **

*** ********* ***** ******, INSUREtrust, **** ***** **** probably ***** **** * dozen ******** *** **** offering ***** ******** *** doing ** ****:

**** * *****-***** ***********, there *** ******** **-** and ****** **** *****’* probably * ** * who *** ***** * real **** *** ** writing ******** *** **********-***** companies.

***** ******** **** *** confirmed ***** ******** ********** ********, ******* ****** [**** no ****** *********],********* ********,********* *********, ***., *** ******. **** is *** ** ********** list. **** **** ******* out ** *** *********, State ****, ********, *** Farmers' ********* *** *** not ***** **** ***.

*********** **** *** *** insurance ********* *** ****** integrators *** ******** ** the *****/******** ***** ************* ***,******,***, *********.

**** ******* [**** ** longer *********], *********, *** CEO ***** ******** ********** * *******, *******, stating **** **** *********** will ** ** ***** existing ******* ********* ***** who **** **** ****, probably ***********, **** *** provide *** ***** ********:

** ********* ********* ***** contacting **** ******** *****. Because *** **** ******** of **** ******** ****** are ***** ** *** that **** **** **** type ** ******** **** in **** **** ** not *** ****.

How **** **** ** ****

*** ******** ** ***** with **** *** **** will **** ********* ** a ****** ** *******, including *** ******** ** the ******* ** ********, the ***** ** ************ they **** ****, *** values ** ***** ********* and *** ********* **** want ***** ******** ** be. ** *********** **** cyber **** ********, ******** will ** **** **** a **** ****** ******** privacy, *****, *** *******. For ******** ** *** three ***** *** * $10 ******* ** ******** company:

  • $* ******* ** ******** is ~$*,***/****
  • $* ******* ** ******** is ~$*,*** - $*,***/****
  • $* ******* ** ******** is ~$**,***/****

********** **** *** **** for * $** ******* in ******** ******* *** $1 ******* ** ******** for ***** **** ** ~$600/year.

*********** ******** **** ***** are **** ** ******** out ***** *** **** create ** *********** ***** that ****** *****'* ******* proper **********:

*** *** ** ****, they **** **** *** offer ***** $** ***-*** and ****’** **** ***** from ** ******* **** risk. * **** ****** will ******* **** ******* these ****** ***-*** ***'* provide.

Who ** ********* **

***'* *******, ** ***** above, **** **** ********* their ******* *********** ******* coverage **** ** ******* who *** ***** ******* on ***** ** ****** the ******. ** **** that ** *****'* ***** it *** *** **** sense ** *** **** the ******** ***** ** believed ** *** ********** and *** ******* *** not ***** ** ****:

******** *********** ******* **** it’s ***** ** ** really *********, *** ** isn’t. ** ****************. **’** *** * number ** ******, ***** 20 ** *** *** the ****** *** ** the ******** ****.

********, ******* **** ** felt **** ******** *** becoming **** *** **** than *** *********, **** more **** **** ** PSA ******* ******** ***** coverage:

** ******** **** ******* of **% ** *** members **** * **** cyber ******** ****** ** effect ***. ****’** *** that *********. ****’* ****** no ****** *** ** have *** ***** ****.

*** ********** ******** *************** ******** ***** ********* coverage ******* ************* ******* **** ********** Group [*****]:

** ****** ********* ***** coverage ** *** ******** and *******. *** ******** is **** *** **** a ***** *******, *** need ******* ** **** you ******* **. *** program ** ***************.

*** ******** ******** ***********(***) **** ********** *********** research ********* *** ******* themselves ** ******:

*** ********** ***** ** research ***** ********* ******** providers *** ** ********* if * ***** ********* policy ***** ***** *****. All ******** ****** ** closely ********, *** *******, SIA ******** ***** ********* can ** * ****** tool.

What *** *** ******* ******* **

**** *********** ****** ******* that * ****** ** unlikely ** ****** ****. And, *************, ***** *** low ***** ******* ** insurers, **** ******* **** they *** ***** (*.*., if * $* ******* policy ***** $***, **** implies *** ******* ****** the **** ** ** occurrence ** * **** are **** **** * in *,***).

**** *********** **** ****** they *** **** ** their *** *** **** not **** *** ***** of ******** **** **** to **** ********. *** example, **** **** ***** the ****** ************* ***** to ******* ****, **** down ******, ****** ******** and ******* *** ****** from *********.

**** **** ******** **** at *** **** ********** with ****** ******** *** weigh **** ******* *** chance **** **** **** suffer * ****** *** say *** **** ** not ********* ** *** risk. ***** *********** **** rightly ****** **** ********* companies ***** *** ***** if ***** ******** *** actually ****** *** **** often. ********* ********* ******** to ****** *** **** because **** ******* **** in ****** ******** **** they *** *** ** claims.

**** ** ***** ** evolving **** ** ********* with *** ******* **** spoke **** ******* ** the "****, **** ****." The ***** ** ********* available ***** ****** ** might ** **********. * wait *** *** ******** may ** **** ** this ****.

Vote / ****

Comments (16)

** * **********, *** of ** ******** *** require * ******* ** $1M ** ***** ********* insurance. 

****** *** *** ******** U#1. *** ** *** you, *** ***** ******** ***** or ***** *** **** for *** ***** ******?

**** ** *** ******* language *** *** ******* project:

***** ********* *********: ******* and ******* ******** (“*****”) insurance ******** **** ******* out ** ** ** connection **** **** ** disclosure ** ******** ***********, PHI, ** ************ ***********, in * ******* ****** of $*,***,*** *** ********** and ** *** ****** aggregate.

*** ********** ** ******* to ****** ***** *********** of ********* **** ***** bid. 

*** *** ***** *** contractor **** *** ***** ******** Information, ***, ** ************ Information?  ** ** **** rare *** ***** ********* to **** * **** to ** **.  *** how ** *** ****** at *** $*,***,*** ******? Are *** ******** **** client **** ******* ** entitled ** * ***** of **** *****?      

*** *** ***** *** contractor **** *** ***** Personal ***********, ***, ** Confidential ***********?

** ** *** ** is ********** ** *******. The ***** ****** ******** the ***** ********* ********** should ** ***** *****.  The $** ****** ** a ******** ***** *** a ******** ***** **** a **** **** ******* a ******* *** ***** write ** *** ****.  We ***** ******** **** amount *** ****** ** more ********* ******* *** the ****** ***** ** determined ** ******* **** the ******* ********* *******. 

*** *** ******** **** client **** ******* ** entitled ** * ***** of **** *****?

**** ** *** ** assumption. ** * *********** network ** ******** *** exposes * ******* *********** their ********* ******* ********** will ** ********* ********* compensation ** *** ******. 

*** **** **** ** a *** ***** *** I ** **** **** insurance ****** **** **** be ****** * ******* by ******* **** *** integrator *** ********. *** NEED **** *** *******!!!!

******* *** ********* ***** should ** ******** ** manufacturer ****. ******* ********* on * ******* ****** a ********** *****. ** course * ** **** joking, ******* ******* ********* for *** **** ** technical ********* ** ************. People, *** **** ** know *** ** ****** and ******** **** ********* infrastructures ** * ******* life ***** *** *** that ******* **** ** your ******** ** ***** the *** ********* *****.

** *** *** ******* because **** *** ** will ** *** ********* adjuster *** ******** ******* attached ** *** ********. Systems *** ** ********** based ** *** ** the **** **** ****** by ** **** ****** increased ***** *** ********* for **** *********** ** said *******. **** ***** stem *** *** *** to *** ******* **** refrigerator ******** ******* *** letting *** ** *** internet **** * ****** apple ******** ** *** ground. ******* ******* *** soon ***** ** **-** bot ******* **** ********* all ** **** ****** compliances *** ******** *** a ***-*** ******* ************. (owned).

** ** *** *** banking ******, **** ***** for **** ***** **** is ******! *** *** see *** *** ******* 1 *****? **** **** guy, **** *** **** food ***** ** **** our ******* ******! (******* Tin **** *** ********).

* ** **** **** insurance ****** **** **** be ****** * *******

** **** ** * commercial ********* ***** *** deals **** ***** ******** a ***.  ***** ******** are ********* ***-*** ** the ******* ********* ******** and *** **** ******.  For *******, ** ******* sized ********** (********* ** her) **** *** ***** $1,000 * **** *** a $** ****** ******.  The ****** **** **** 10% *** *** ***** will *** ********* ******* 35%-50% ** **** ** you *** ******* $**-$**. Needless ** *** *** has *** **** ** rich *** *** * am ***** ******** ** go ** **** ********. 

****** *** *** **** UD#1, *** ***** ** good *****. ******* * should **** ******** *** "killing" ******* *** ******** themselves, **% **** *** a *** ****** ******** hacks, **** ***** ** still ********* ************ ******* to *** ****** **.

********** * **** **** flip **** *********, ** when ** **** **** breaks * ***'* **** to *** ** *** grocery ***** ** *** a *** **** *** $1 ****** ***** **** being ******* ** ***** another $** ******* ** other ****. ******** ** should ** "********* *** those **** *** ***** stuff".

***** ** ******** ** insurance ******* *** **** called *****'* ** ******. They **** ********* ****** anything... *** * *****.

*********** *** ********* ******** is ***** ** ****-*********, I'll ******** **** **** mongering. 

********** ** ** *********** last ****. 

** * ******* ****... This ***** ** ******** covered ** **** *'* and *'* ** *** fine ***** ** **** quotes.  ** * ********** this ** * ******* just ** ****. ** have **, *** **'* something ** ********* ***'* have ** *** ******* we ***** *** ***** a ****** ***** ******** spec ******* ** **** protect *** ********* **** irresponsible ***********.

**** ***** ** ********** and ***** *******.

***'* ** ******** ** someone ********* ** **********'* enterprise ******* ** ******* breaching * ****** ** device ** ********** ********.  One ** ******* ** cyber ******** *********, *** is ***.  

*** **** ****** ** end-user ****** ******* ***** security ********* ** ** integrator ** ** *** integrator **** ***** ***-**** confidential **** ** ***** networks. **** ** ****** among ****** ********* *** completely ********** ** *********** system *****.  *******, *** end-user *** ********** ****** make ** ***** ** the ******** **** ** no ***** ***** *** integrator ***** ***-**** ************ data ** ***** ********** network.

*** ** ***-**** **** an ****** ******* ****** and *** ****** ***** installation ******* ***** *** the ********** ****, ********* SSNs, **** *** ******.  That ** *** ********* by ***** ******** *********.  It ** ****** *** covered ** ******** ****** perhaps ************ ********* ********* (errors *** *********) ** the ****** *** * result ** **********. 

****** ****: **'* **** practice ** **** ***** security ********* ** *************** - *** **** not ******* *** ** force ******* **** ** protect*********.

 

 

**** *******, ******. * wanted ** ***** *** for *** ***********. *'** reached **** *** ** my ******* *** *** story ** **** ** a *** ******* ** the ********* *********** ********* to *** ** * can **** **** **** information. *'** ****** ** with **** *********** ** it ******* *********.

***** ******. * ***** back **** ****** ** INSUREtrust *** **** **** Lynne ** *** ********* Information *********. **** ** what ****** *** ** say *** *****'* ******** follow:

*’* *** **** ***** this ********** *** **** information *** ** ** inaccurate. **** ***** **** a **** **** “***-**” cyber-extension ** ***** ** they *** ***** *** impression **** ******** ** this *******. **** ***** also *** **** ********** that *** *********** * spoke ** *** ***** to ******* **** *** Cyber *** **** *&* exposures ** * ******** basis. ***** *** *** policies ** *** ******* and ************ ** ****** integrator **********. 

 

“*** ** ***-**** **** an ****** ******* ****** and *** ****** ***** installation ******* ***** *** the ********** ****, ********* SSNs, **** *** ******. That ** *** ********* by ***** ******** *********.”

 

  • ** **** ****** ******* insurance **** *****’* ***** this ********, **** *** under-insured *** ***** ******** and ********* *** ****** much *** ***** ********. This ******** ** ***% available ** * **** Cyber/Tech ******. **** ** also *** ******* ******** to ********** *** **** to **** * **** E&O/Cyber ****** ** * combined ****. *** ******** I ********* * **** most ***** *** ***** combined-form ******** **** ******’* leave * *** **** this ** *** ********. I **** ******* ******** you ****** ******** ** the *****-***** **** ** the ****** ** **** own ******* – *** that ***’* *** **** thing ** *********** ****** needs ** ***** ** what *** ***** ****-**** should **.
  • **’** *** * ***** where ** *****/****** **** integrator ****’* ***** ********* code **** *** ** some ** *** ********/******** that *** ***** ********* and ** * ****** of ***** ********, ******** clients ***** *** ***** attack ** ***** ******* that ******** *-** ****** after *** ******** **** performed. ***** ** **** area ** ** ******* or *** *** **** E&O ** *** ***** should ******* ** **** of ***** *********, ***** the ******* ** ******* them ** * ********, sophisticated **** **** ***** anything **** ******* ******* the ******. *** ***** have ** ***** ******* this ******* ** *** have * *****-** *&* add ** ** **** GL *** * *****-** Cyber *********, ***** ** precisely *** ** ********* against **** ******** . In **** ****, ** did *** ** ******* via * ******** **** E&O/Cyber ****. ** *** both ******* ******** ********** because **** ** *** the ********* **** ***** its *** ******* ** these ******* ** *** first ***** – *** also *****-************ ********** ** it ** **** ** their ******** ** **** to ****** ***** ******** won’t ****** ** *********** data. *** **** *** had **** ** * sophisticated, ******** **** ** place, ***** ***** **** been **** ****** ******** between ******** *** **** actual ****** ********. **** could **** ******* ** even ********** *** ****** payment **** ***** ********.
  • ****, *** ********** ** a ***** ** **** combined ****** ****** ******* a ******* *** ****** of ********. **** ****** cover *** ****** ** warranties ******** ** *** confidentiality ** ****** **** AND *** ****** **** against *** *** ************* breach ** ******** ******** to **** ************/**** ********. Adequately ******** *** ***** scenarios **** ***** *****-**** into ***** *** *&*, but **** ********* ***** coverage ***** **** ** policies ******** ******* ****** of ******** **** **** they ** *** *** throw ** ***** *** tech *&*.
  • **** ********* ** ** integrator/installer *****’* ********* **** the ************ ** ******** ** ******* ****** your ********. ** ********* activity *** ***** ** a ******’* ****** ** result ** **** ********** to **** ******/**** *** you ****** **** ******* as * ******, *** are ****** *** ******** is ********* *** ****. Many *****/**** ****** ** handle ******** ***** *** service *** *******. ** a *** ** *****, the ******* ***** **** some **** ** ********** connection ** ********** ** remote-in *** ******* *******/*********** of ******* *** *******. If * *******/******** ***** was ****** ** *********** with **** *** ********** from *** ********** ** the ********* ******* (** any ***** ****** *** policy ******) **** ****** have ********. ************, **** of ***** ****** ****** purely ******* ***** ************* (cyber ********** ******** ** funds ********/******** ********/*********** ** viruses, ***.)

 

“*** **** ****** ** end-user ****** ******* ***** security ********* ** ** integrator ** ** *** integrator **** ***** ***-**** confidential **** ** ***** networks.”

 

  • **** ********* ***** **** are *********** * ********* of ******** ********* *** efficiency ********. *** ******** being ***** ******* ************. What ** *** ********** isn’t ******* *** ********* client **** ** ***** own ******* *** ****** outsourcing **** ** * cloud ******** ***** **** store ** ***? **** is ***** ******* ***** responsibility ** *******, ********** if * ****** ******* from *** ***** ********. That ***** ** *** insurance’s *** ** ******/********* on *** *********** ****** on *** ****-***. *** integrator ***** ***** **** to ****** ** ***** clients ** *** ***** end – **** *** current ***** ****** ** privacy **********. **** ** why ***** ***** ***** coverage ** *********. 
  • *** ********** *** ******** more *** **** ********** based ********* *** ******** to ******* **** ********* with * “*******-****” ********. This ** **** **** predominant ** **** ******** that, ** ******, ***** with ************* ******** *** inter-connected **** ********/*********. ** many *********** *** ********/***** providers *** **** *** remote-connect ** ************ ******* systems ** ***** ** provide ******* *** ********** services, *** *** **** developing **** *** ********-********* user ********* ** **** their ******** **** **** convenient ** ***-*****. **’* not ** ****** ** “are *** ******* ****** data ** ***” ** I ******** **** *****. This ***** ** * lot ** ******** *** our ******** *** ******* alike ********* ***** *** technology *****. **** *** a ***** ** ******* and ********* ** *** is *******/************ ** ********/********* to **** **** ** any ***** ** ****, there ***** ** **** parties *********** ****** ** the *********. ***** **** exposures ****** ** ***** and ********** *** (**** property ****** *** **** bodily ******, ******** ***** manipulated *** ***** ****, etc.) **** ** **** to ** ********** *** just ******** **** ** coverage. ** *********, **** is *** **** **** someone ******** * ******** exposure ******. ** ** continue **** **** **** of ************* *********, ** regulatory ************ ****** **** complex, *** ** *** own ******** ****** ************* and ******* **** ******* out ** ******** *** data – ** **** to **** **** *** businesses *** ******** *** the ******** ***** *** expenses ** ***** ********.

*** **** ** **** Lynne ** *** ********* Information ********* *** ** say:

** *** **** ******* else ******** **** ****, you **** ** **** your ****** ******** ***** them ****** *** **** breaches – *** **** must **** ***** *********.

 

***, *’* ***** **** that ********* *****. ***, you **** **** *********** review *** ******* ** your ****** ********* ** see **** **** ****** breach *********.

 

***** ********* **** ***** data ********. ** ******:

  • ***** **** *** ********
  • ********* ********* ***** * data ******
  • ********* ******** ********** ** affected *********
  • ********** *********** ****
  • ********* ******* ******** *******

****** *** *** ****** up, **** ****** **** everyone.

******'* ********* ***** ** a ******** *****/*&* ****** which ****** ***'* ********** which ****** ****** ****.  If * ****** ****** the ***** ** *** policy ** *** ***** will ******, **** ***** appears ** ** ****** "**** *** **** ******** from ** *** ****** you **** ** ******* in *** *****."  ** **** *** two ******** ******** **** they ***** ********* ****** right?  * ***** ********* each ******* *** ******* on **** **** ***** own ********* ********.

******** * ** ***** with ***** ** ** what ***** ********* ****** for * **** ******.

  • ***** **** *** ********
  • ********* ********* ***** * data ******
  • ********* ******** ********** ** affected *********
  • ********** *********** ****
  • ********* ******* ******** *******

**** * ** *********** is **** *** **********'* insurance ******* ***** ******* payout $*,***,*** ** *** end-user ** **** **** of ******** ******* *****.  They ***** **** ***** the ***** ** *** above ****** ******** *** only ** ********* **** was ******** ** **** of *** ******.  **** the **** ** **** these ******** ******* ***** it ** ******** **** bill ***** *** ******* of $**.  

****, *** ****** *** for *** ******* ** to *** **** *** integrator ***** *** ********* company *********** ** *** systems **** ****** ***** the ********* ** *** system ** *********** ** the *** ****.  ****** that **** ** **** contracts!  ** **#*, ** SSNs, ** ****, ** sensitive ********, ***.  *** that ***** *** ** added ** **** ** which ***** *** ***-***** Cyber ********* ****** ***** data ******** ****** ******* as ** **** ** part ** ***** ********** IT *********** *** *******.  (understanding *** ** **** changes **** ****** ****.)

 

***** ******,

*****, ****** *** ******** some ******* *********** ** response ** **** **** comment:

“******'* ********* ***** ** a ******** *****/*&* ****** which ****** ***'* ********** which ****** ****** ****.

  • **** ** ******* ** point. ***** ** *** a ***** **** ******* which ******** ***** **** when **** *** ********* separately – ***** ** gray **** *** ** long ** ***** ** gray **** **** **** will ****** ** *********** circumstances *** *** ******* when * ***** **** go ****, **** *** example * **** ** my ******** ********. ********* the ********* ** *********** filling ** *** **** and *********** *** ******-******** game **** *** ***** happens.

“**** ***** ******* ** be ****** "**** *** **** ******** from ** *** ****** you **** ** ******* in *** *****." ** **** *** two ******** ******** **** they ***** ********* ****** right?”

  • **** ** *** *******. I ** ************ **** purchase *** ****** **** is * ******** ****** form **** ******** *** both *** ***** *** Tech *&* ******** ** one. ** ***** ******** we *** **** ** craft **** **** ***** coverage ***** *** **** technology ******* *******, ****** of ********, ****** ** hardware ************/******, ** **** as ****** **** ***** monitoring ********. * ** recommending ******* ********** *** ******** ******** for *** ***** *** E&O. ** **** *** separate, ********* *** ******* is ******* ******* ******** and ********* ** * more ********* ****. ************, both ***** ******** ******** have ** “***** ********* clause” ***** ** *** I ********** *** ******* causing ******* ****** *** to ***** *******. ******* wants ** *** ***. Also, **** ***** *** separate ******** ** ******* see **** **** ***** the *&* ** ***** package ****** (***** ** very ******* ******** ******** to * ******** *****/*&* form */ * ********* market **’* *********) *** they **** * ***** cyber ***-** ** **** cyber ********** ******* **** doesn’t **** **** **** they **** *** ***** also *** *********** **** in *** ***** ** error ** ***** ******** or ******* **** *** to ** **** ******* or ******* ******** **********, which ** ******** * more *** **** ****** occurrence. *** *************, **** people ** ******* **** those *** ***** ***** listed *** ** ******** cyber ******** **** **** merely ********* *** ******* of **** * ****-******* cyber ******** ****** **** like.

 

****, *** ** *** below *** **** ***** Cyber ********* *** ***** is * *** ******* here.

  • ***** **** *** ********
  • ********* ********* ***** * data ******
  • ********* ******** ********** ** affected *********
  • ********** *********** ****
  • ********* ******* ******** *******

 

***** ********* **** **** to ** ********* *** looked ** ********** **** business ************ ***** (***** can ** **** ***** losses), **** ** ****** customers *** ** *** hacking *****, ****** ********* expenses ** **** ********** communicate ****** ****** ***********, cyber ***** ******** *** to ********** ****** ****** for ******* ******** ** wire *********, ******** ****** expenses ** ********* *** scope ** ******** ****** recovering/repairing ****, ******** *** cyber *********/********** ******* *** recovery, ***.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,362 reports, 854 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

LifeSafety Power NetLink Vulnerabilities And Problematic Response on May 20, 2019
'Power supplies' are not devices that many think about when considering vulnerabilities but as more and more devices go 'online', the risks for...
Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Insurance Startup Coalition Profile on Mar 20, 2019
Many industry people believe cybersecurity insurance is not worth it, as the voting and debate in our Cybersecurity Insurance For Security...
What Is the Importance of Revenue vs Profitability for Integrators? Statistics on Mar 01, 2019
A company can be highly profitable but if it is small, they will still not make much money. By contrast, a company can generate lots revenue, but...
Uniview Intrusion Analytics and VMD Tested on Aug 13, 2018
IPVM's IP Camera Analytics Shootout featuring Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision created some ill will with a Uniview distributor who...
Integrators Divided On Website Importance to Business (Statistics) on May 04, 2018
Are websites important? Still quite a number of integrators have no websites.  New IPVM statistics show that nearly half of all integrators find a...
Health Care Insurance Integrator Benefits Statistics on Feb 20, 2018
How common and how much healthcare coverage is typically provided by security companies? 150+ integrators explained how their companies provide the...
If You Have 4 Cameras, You Can Throw Them Away, If You Have 400, They Throw You Away on Jan 19, 2018
Do users care about anything but price? Do user care about cybersecurity? Do users care about trusting their supplier? These have become...
Improving Project Registration Guide on Sep 29, 2017
Manufacturers want integrators to register large projects. Integrators want the discounts that come with registration, but not some of the other...
Wrongly Accused Critical Vulnerability for Vivotek on Jul 13, 2017
Vulnerabilities are an increasing branding and business problem for video surveillance manufacturers. However, sometimes vulnerabilities reported...
Importance of Sales To Integrators - Statistics on Jun 23, 2017
One of the top trends in the industry over the past few years has been the rise of across-the-board sales (e.g.: Hikvision Sales, Dahua Sale,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...