Cybersecurity Insurance For Security Integrators

By: Dan Gelinas, Published on Nov 29, 2018

Most security industry professionals carry insurance to cover themselves in the event of a general loss. However, most are not carrying cyber insurance.

Insurers and industry groups IPVM spoke to say it is a 'no-brainer,' however, for integrators that are concerned about the bottom line and may feel that they will not have an issue, this may look like a poor investment.

cybersecurity insurance

In this note, based on our research and interviews we look at:

  • Why have it
  • What are the different types
  • Who offers it
  • How much does it cost
  • Who is endorsing it
  • What reasons against it

**** ******** ******** ************* carry ********* ** ***** themselves ** *** ***** of * ******* ****. However, **** *** *** carrying ***** *********.

******** *** ******** ****** IPVM ***** ** *** it ** * '**-*******,' however, *** *********** **** are ********* ***** *** bottom **** *** *** feel **** **** **** not **** ** *****, this *** **** **** a **** **********.

cybersecurity insurance

** **** ****, ***** on *** ******** *** interviews ** **** **:

  • *** **** **
  • **** *** *** ********* types
  • *** ****** **
  • *** **** **** ** cost
  • *** ** ********* **
  • **** ******* ******* **

[***************]

Why **** ** - ******** **** ***** ****

**** ******** ************* **** to ***** ** ***** general ********* (**) ******** to ******* ***** ******** in *** ***** ** a **** ** ** the ***** **** **** a ******* ** * system *******. *** *******, it ** ****** ** commercial **** ** ******* proof ** *********.

*******, ***** ********* ** not ******* ********* **** security *********** ***** **, though********* *********, ***., *** ** *** insurers **** ***** ****, said **** "***** ** one ** *** ******* growth ***** *** *** of *** ******* ****** areas *** *** ********* industry, *******."

[**** ** ****** *********]

********* ** ****** ********** [link ** ****** *********], Professional ***** ****** ** ***********, * ********* ****** of ***** ******** ** insurance *********, *** ******** a ***** ****** *** get ********* **** *******:

*** ******* ****** **** for ********* ** *** $25-$50 ******* ******* ***** without * ****** ** $650,000. *** ******* **** for * ******* ******** is $***/****. *** ******* cost *** * ******** forensics ****** ** *********** your ****** ** $***/****.

********* ********* ******* ** ************** ***** **** ****** respondents **** * ***** breach ** **** ***** was **********, **** **** not ******** *** *** eventuality.

*******, *********** **** ***** coverage ************ *** ******** to ****** ** ********* of ****** *********:

** ***** *********** **** bigger *******, ***** ******* are ***** ** **** bigger ***** ***** *** they'll ** ******* ***** coverages **** ***** ************.

***** **** [**** ** longer *********] ********* ************* **** **** **** with *** **** ** department *** *** **** stringent ************* **** ********* adherence, *** ******** ******** clicking ** * **** in ** ***** *** undermine * ******* *** open **** ** * breach.

What *** *** ********* *****

*********** **** **** ** is ****** * ******** to ***** ** *** different ***** ** ******** as ****** "*****":

***** ** * *** name *** **. ** matter ***** *** **** is—on ***** ** ** the *****—***’** ***** ****** for **. ********’* ******* on *** ******, *** we **** ****** ****** coming ** **** ****’* about ********.

***** *** ******** * types ** ******** **** fall ***** *** ******* catch-all ******* "*****," ********* to ***********

  • *******
  • *****
  • *******

********** ****:

*** ******* ******* ** media *** **** * teacher ****** * ***** guide ****** *** ** was ** $**,*** ***** because ****** **** *** an ******** ******* *** people ********** ******* *******. A ***** ** ****** had ********** **** ***** guide, ** *** ******* grew.

********* ** *** ******** IPVM ***** **** * good ***** ****** ****** also ***** ****** **** slander, *****, *****************, ********* infringement, *** ****** **** infringement.

Who ****** **

*** ********* ***** ******, INSUREtrust, **** ***** **** probably ***** **** * dozen ******** *** **** offering ***** ******** *** doing ** ****:

**** * *****-***** ***********, there *** ******** **-** and ****** **** *****’* probably * ** * who *** ***** * real **** *** ** writing ******** *** **********-***** companies.

***** ******** **** *** confirmed ***** ******** ********** ********, ******* ****** [**** no ****** *********],********* ********,********* *********, ***., *** ******. **** is *** ** ********** list. **** **** ******* out ** *** *********, State ****, ********, *** Farmers' ********* *** *** not ***** **** ***.

*********** **** *** *** insurance ********* *** ****** integrators *** ******** ** the *****/******** ***** ************* ***,******,***, *********.

**** ******* [**** ** longer *********], *********, *** CEO ***** ******** ********** * *******, *******, stating **** **** *********** will ** ** ***** existing ******* ********* ***** who **** **** ****, probably ***********, **** *** provide *** ***** ********:

** ********* ********* ***** contacting **** ******** *****. Because *** **** ******** of **** ******** ****** are ***** ** *** that **** **** **** type ** ******** **** in **** **** ** not *** ****.

How **** **** ** ****

*** ******** ** ***** with **** *** **** will **** ********* ** a ****** ** *******, including *** ******** ** the ******* ** ********, the ***** ** ************ they **** ****, *** values ** ***** ********* and *** ********* **** want ***** ******** ** be. ** *********** **** cyber **** ********, ******** will ** **** **** a **** ****** ******** privacy, *****, *** *******. For ******** ** *** three ***** *** * $10 ******* ** ******** company:

  • $* ******* ** ******** is ~$*,***/****
  • $* ******* ** ******** is ~$*,*** - $*,***/****
  • $* ******* ** ******** is ~$**,***/****

********** **** *** **** for * $** ******* in ******** ******* *** $1 ******* ** ******** for ***** **** ** ~$600/year.

*********** ******** **** ***** are **** ** ******** out ***** *** **** create ** *********** ***** that ****** *****'* ******* proper **********:

*** *** ** ****, they **** **** *** offer ***** $** ***-*** and ****’** **** ***** from ** ******* **** risk. * **** ****** will ******* **** ******* these ****** ***-*** ***'* provide.

Who ** ********* **

***'* *******, ** ***** above, **** **** ********* their members *********** ******* ******** from ** ******* *** has ***** ******* ** staff ** ****** *** policy. ** **** **** in *****'* ***** ** did *** **** ***** to *** **** *** coverage ***** ** ******** it *** ********** *** the ******* *** *** going ** ****:

******** *********** ******* **** it’s ***** ** ** really *********, *** ** isn’t. ** ********* *******. **’** *** * ****** of ******, ***** ** so *** *** *** claims *** ** *** millions ****.

********, ******* **** ** felt **** ******** *** becoming **** *** **** than *** *********, **** more **** **** ** PSA ******* ******** ***** coverage:

** ******** **** ******* of **% ** *** members **** * **** cyber ******** ****** ** effect ***. ****’** *** that *********. ****’* ****** no ****** *** ** have *** ***** ****.

*** ********** ******** *************** ******** ***** ********* coverage ******* ************* ******* **** ********** Group [*****]:

** ****** ********* ***** coverage ** *** ******** and *******. *** ******** is **** *** **** a ***** *******, *** need ******* ** **** you ******* **. *** program ** ***************. 

*** ******** ******** ***********(***) **** ********** *********** research ********* *** ******* themselves ** ******:

*** ********** ***** ** research ***** ********* ******** providers *** ** ********* if * ***** ********* policy ***** ***** *****. All ******** ****** ** closely ********, *** *******, SIA ******** ***** ********* can ** * ****** tool.

What *** *** ******* ******* **

**** *********** ****** ******* that * ****** ** unlikely ** ****** ****. And, *************, ***** *** low ***** ******* ** insurers, **** ******* **** they *** ***** (*.*., if * $* ******* policy ***** $***, **** implies *** ******* ****** the **** ** ** occurrence ** * **** are **** **** * in *,***).

**** *********** **** ****** they *** **** ** their *** *** **** not **** *** ***** of ******** **** **** to **** ********. *** example, **** **** ***** the ****** ************* ***** to ******* ****, **** down ******, ****** ******** and ******* *** ****** from *********.

**** **** ******** **** at *** **** ********** with ****** ******** *** weigh **** ******* *** chance **** **** **** suffer * ****** *** say *** **** ** not ********* ** *** risk. ***** *********** **** rightly ****** **** ********* companies ***** *** ***** if ***** ******** *** actually ****** *** **** often. ********* ********* ******** to ****** *** **** because **** ******* **** in ****** ******** **** they *** *** ** claims.

**** ** ***** ** evolving **** ** ********* with *** ******* **** spoke **** ******* ** the "****, **** ****." The ***** ** ********* available ***** ****** ** might ** **********. * wait *** *** ******** may ** **** ** this ****. 

Vote / ****

Comments (16)

** * **********, *** of ** ******** *** require * ******* ** $1M ** ***** ********* insurance. 

****** *** *** ******** U#1. *** ** *** you, *** ***** ******** ***** or ***** *** **** for *** ***** ******?

**** ** *** ******* language *** *** ******* project:

***** ********* *********: ******* and ******* ******** (“*****”) insurance ******** **** ******* out ** ** ** connection **** **** ** disclosure ** ******** ***********, PHI, ** ************ ***********, in * ******* ****** of $*,***,*** *** ********** and ** *** ****** aggregate.

*** ********** ** ******* to ****** ***** *********** of ********* **** ***** bid. 

*** *** ***** *** contractor **** *** ***** ******** Information, ***, ** ************ Information?  ** ** **** rare *** ***** ********* to **** * **** to ** **.  *** how ** *** ****** at *** $*,***,*** ******? Are *** ******** **** client **** ******* ** entitled ** * ***** of **** *****?      

*** *** ***** *** contractor **** *** ***** Personal ***********, ***, ** Confidential ***********?

** ** *** ** is ********** ** *******. The ***** ****** ******** the ***** ********* ********** should ** ***** *****.  The $** ****** ** a ******** ***** *** a ******** ***** **** a **** **** ******* a ******* *** ***** write ** *** ****.  We ***** ******** **** amount *** ****** ** more ********* ******* *** the ****** ***** ** determined ** ******* **** the ******* ********* *******. 

*** *** ******** **** client **** ******* ** entitled ** * ***** of **** *****?

**** ** *** ** assumption. ** * *********** network ** ******** *** exposes * ******* *********** their ********* ******* ********** will ** ********* ********* compensation ** *** ******. 

*** **** **** ** a *** ***** *** I ** **** **** insurance ****** **** **** be ****** * ******* by ******* **** *** integrator *** ********. *** NEED **** *** *******!!!!

******* *** ********* ***** should ** ******** ** manufacturer ****. ******* ********* on * ******* ****** a ********** *****. ** course * ** **** joking, ******* ******* ********* for *** **** ** technical ********* ** ************. People, *** **** ** know *** ** ****** and ******** **** ********* infrastructures ** * ******* life ***** *** *** that ******* **** ** your ******** ** ***** the *** ********* *****.

** *** *** ******* because **** *** ** will ** *** ********* adjuster *** ******** ******* attached ** *** ********. Systems *** ** ********** based ** *** ** the **** **** ****** by ** **** ****** increased ***** *** ********* for **** *********** ** said *******. **** ***** stem *** *** *** to *** ******* **** refrigerator ******** ******* *** letting *** ** *** internet **** * ****** apple ******** ** *** ground. ******* ******* *** soon ***** ** **-** bot ******* **** ********* all ** **** ****** compliances *** ******** *** a ***-*** ******* ************. (owned).

** ** *** *** banking ******, **** ***** for **** ***** **** is ******! *** *** see *** *** ******* 1 *****? **** **** guy, **** *** **** food ***** ** **** our ******* ******! (******* Tin **** *** ********).

* ** **** **** insurance ****** **** **** be ****** * *******

** **** ** * commercial ********* ***** *** deals **** ***** ******** a ***.  ***** ******** are ********* ***-*** ** the ******* ********* ******** and *** **** ******.  For *******, ** ******* sized ********** (********* ** her) **** *** ***** $1,000 * **** *** a $** ****** ******.  The ****** **** **** 10% *** *** ***** will *** ********* ******* 35%-50% ** **** ** you *** ******* $**-$**. Needless ** *** *** has *** **** ** rich *** *** * am ***** ******** ** go ** **** ********. 

****** *** *** **** UD#1, *** ***** ** good *****. ******* * should **** ******** *** "killing" ******* *** ******** themselves, **% **** *** a *** ****** ******** hacks, **** ***** ** still ********* ************ ******* to *** ****** **.

********** * **** **** flip **** *********, ** when ** **** **** breaks * ***'* **** to *** ** *** grocery ***** ** *** a *** **** *** $1 ****** ***** **** being ******* ** ***** another $** ******* ** other ****. ******** ** should ** "********* *** those **** *** ***** stuff".

***** ** ******** ** insurance ******* *** **** called *****'* ** ******. They **** ********* ****** anything... *** * *****.

*********** *** ********* ******** is ***** ** ****-*********, I'll ******** **** **** mongering. 

********** ** ** *********** last ****. 

** * ******* ****... This ***** ** ******** covered ** **** *'* and *'* ** *** fine ***** ** **** quotes.  ** * ********** this ** * ******* just ** ****. ** have **, *** **'* something ** ********* ***'* have ** *** ******* we ***** *** ***** a ****** ***** ******** spec ******* ** **** protect *** ********* **** irresponsible ***********.

**** ***** ** ********** and ***** *******.

***'* ** ******** ** someone ********* ** **********'* enterprise ******* ** ******* breaching * ****** ** device ** ********** ********.  One ** ******* ** cyber ******** *********, *** is ***.  

*** **** ****** ** end-user ****** ******* ***** security ********* ** ** integrator ** ** *** integrator **** ***** ***-**** confidential **** ** ***** networks. **** ** ****** among ****** ********* *** completely ********** ** *********** system *****.  *******, *** end-user *** ********** ****** make ** ***** ** the ******** **** ** no ***** ***** *** integrator ***** ***-**** ************ data ** ***** ********** network.

*** ** ***-**** **** an ****** ******* ****** and *** ****** ***** installation ******* ***** *** the ********** ****, ********* SSNs, **** *** ******.  That ** *** ********* by ***** ******** *********.  It ** ****** *** covered ** ******** ****** perhaps ************ ********* ********* (errors *** *********) ** the ****** *** * result ** **********. 

****** ****: **'* **** practice ** **** ***** security ********* ** *************** - *** **** not ******* *** ** force ******* **** ** protect*********.

 

 

**** *******, ******. * wanted ** ***** *** for *** ***********. *'** reached **** *** ** my ******* *** *** story ** **** ** a *** ******* ** the ********* *********** ********* to *** ** * can **** **** **** information. *'** ****** ** with **** *********** ** it ******* *********.

***** ******. * ***** back **** ****** ** INSUREtrust *** **** **** Lynne ** *** ********* Information *********. **** ** what ****** *** ** say *** *****'* ******** follow:

*’* *** **** ***** this ********** *** **** information *** ** ** inaccurate. **** ***** **** a **** **** “***-**” cyber-extension ** ***** ** they *** ***** *** impression **** ******** ** this *******. **** ***** also *** **** ********** that *** *********** * spoke ** *** ***** to ******* **** *** Cyber *** **** *&* exposures ** * ******** basis. ***** *** *** policies ** *** ******* and ************ ** ****** integrator **********. 

 

“*** ** ***-**** **** an ****** ******* ****** and *** ****** ***** installation ******* ***** *** the ********** ****, ********* SSNs, **** *** ******. That ** *** ********* by ***** ******** *********.”

 

  • ** **** ****** ******* insurance **** *****’* ***** this ********, **** *** under-insured *** ***** ******** and ********* *** ****** much *** ***** ********. This ******** ** ***% available ** * **** Cyber/Tech ******. **** ** also *** ******* ******** to ********** *** **** to **** * **** E&O/Cyber ****** ** * combined ****. *** ******** I ********* * **** most ***** *** ***** combined-form ******** **** ******’* leave * *** **** this ** *** ********. I **** ******* ******** you ****** ******** ** the *****-***** **** ** the ****** ** **** own ******* – *** that ***’* *** **** thing ** *********** ****** needs ** ***** ** what *** ***** ****-**** should **.
  • **’** *** * ***** where ** *****/****** **** integrator ****’* ***** ********* code **** *** ** some ** *** ********/******** that *** ***** ********* and ** * ****** of ***** ********, ******** clients ***** *** ***** attack ** ***** ******* that ******** *-** ****** after *** ******** **** performed. ***** ** **** area ** ** ******* or *** *** **** E&O ** *** ***** should ******* ** **** of ***** *********, ***** the ******* ** ******* them ** * ********, sophisticated **** **** ***** anything **** ******* ******* the ******. *** ***** have ** ***** ******* this ******* ** *** have * *****-** *&* add ** ** **** GL *** * *****-** Cyber *********, ***** ** precisely *** ** ********* against **** ******** . In **** ****, ** did *** ** ******* via * ******** **** E&O/Cyber ****. ** *** both ******* ******** ********** because **** ** *** the ********* **** ***** its *** ******* ** these ******* ** *** first ***** – *** also *****-************ ********** ** it ** **** ** their ******** ** **** to ****** ***** ******** won’t ****** ** *********** data. *** **** *** had **** ** * sophisticated, ******** **** ** place, ***** ***** **** been **** ****** ******** between ******** *** **** actual ****** ********. **** could **** ******* ** even ********** *** ****** payment **** ***** ********.
  • ****, *** ********** ** a ***** ** **** combined ****** ****** ******* a ******* *** ****** of ********. **** ****** cover *** ****** ** warranties ******** ** *** confidentiality ** ****** **** AND *** ****** **** against *** *** ************* breach ** ******** ******** to **** ************/**** ********. Adequately ******** *** ***** scenarios **** ***** *****-**** into ***** *** *&*, but **** ********* ***** coverage ***** **** ** policies ******** ******* ****** of ******** **** **** they ** *** *** throw ** ***** *** tech *&*.
  • **** ********* ** ** integrator/installer *****’* ********* **** the ************ ** ******** ** ******* ****** your ********. ** ********* activity *** ***** ** a ******’* ****** ** result ** **** ********** to **** ******/**** *** you ****** **** ******* as * ******, *** are ****** *** ******** is ********* *** ****. Many *****/**** ****** ** handle ******** ***** *** service *** *******. ** a *** ** *****, the ******* ***** **** some **** ** ********** connection ** ********** ** remote-in *** ******* *******/*********** of ******* *** *******. If * *******/******** ***** was ****** ** *********** with **** *** ********** from *** ********** ** the ********* ******* (** any ***** ****** *** policy ******) **** ****** have ********. ************, **** of ***** ****** ****** purely ******* ***** ************* (cyber ********** ******** ** funds ********/******** ********/*********** ** viruses, ***.)

 

“*** **** ****** ** end-user ****** ******* ***** security ********* ** ** integrator ** ** *** integrator **** ***** ***-**** confidential **** ** ***** networks.”

 

  • **** ********* ***** **** are *********** * ********* of ******** ********* *** efficiency ********. *** ******** being ***** ******* ************. What ** *** ********** isn’t ******* *** ********* client **** ** ***** own ******* *** ****** outsourcing **** ** * cloud ******** ***** **** store ** ***? **** is ***** ******* ***** responsibility ** *******, ********** if * ****** ******* from *** ***** ********. That ***** ** *** insurance’s *** ** ******/********* on *** *********** ****** on *** ****-***. *** integrator ***** ***** **** to ****** ** ***** clients ** *** ***** end – **** *** current ***** ****** ** privacy **********. **** ** why ***** ***** ***** coverage ** *********. 
  • *** ********** *** ******** more *** **** ********** based ********* *** ******** to ******* **** ********* with * “*******-****” ********. This ** **** **** predominant ** **** ******** that, ** ******, ***** with ************* ******** *** inter-connected **** ********/*********. ** many *********** *** ********/***** providers *** **** *** remote-connect ** ************ ******* systems ** ***** ** provide ******* *** ********** services, *** *** **** developing **** *** ********-********* user ********* ** **** their ******** **** **** convenient ** ***-*****. **’* not ** ****** ** “are *** ******* ****** data ** ***” ** I ******** **** *****. This ***** ** * lot ** ******** *** our ******** *** ******* alike ********* ***** *** technology *****. **** *** a ***** ** ******* and ********* ** *** is *******/************ ** ********/********* to **** **** ** any ***** ** ****, there ***** ** **** parties *********** ****** ** the *********. ***** **** exposures ****** ** ***** and ********** *** (**** property ****** *** **** bodily ******, ******** ***** manipulated *** ***** ****, etc.) **** ** **** to ** ********** *** just ******** **** ** coverage. ** *********, **** is *** **** **** someone ******** * ******** exposure ******. ** ** continue **** **** **** of ************* *********, ** regulatory ************ ****** **** complex, *** ** *** own ******** ****** ************* and ******* **** ******* out ** ******** *** data – ** **** to **** **** *** businesses *** ******** *** the ******** ***** *** expenses ** ***** ********.

*** **** ** **** Lynne ** *** ********* Information ********* *** ** say:

** *** **** ******* else ******** **** ****, you **** ** **** your ****** ******** ***** them ****** *** **** breaches – *** **** must **** ***** *********.

 

***, *’* ***** **** that ********* *****. ***, you **** **** *********** review *** ******* ** your ****** ********* ** see **** **** ****** breach *********.

 

***** ********* **** ***** data ********. ** ******:

  • ***** **** *** ********
  • ********* ********* ***** * data ******
  • ********* ******** ********** ** affected *********
  • ********** *********** ****
  • ********* ******* ******** *******

****** *** *** ****** up, **** ****** **** everyone.

******'* ********* ***** ** a ******** *****/*&* ****** which ****** ***'* ********** which ****** ****** ****.  If * ****** ****** the ***** ** *** policy ** *** ***** will ******, **** ***** appears ** ** ****** "**** *** **** ******** from ** *** ****** you **** ** ******* in *** *****."  ** **** *** two ******** ******** **** they ***** ********* ****** right?  * ***** ********* each ******* *** ******* on **** **** ***** own ********* ********.

******** * ** ***** with ***** ** ** what ***** ********* ****** for * **** ******.

  • ***** **** *** ********
  • ********* ********* ***** * data ******
  • ********* ******** ********** ** affected *********
  • ********** *********** ****
  • ********* ******* ******** *******

**** * ** *********** is **** *** **********'* insurance ******* ***** ******* payout $*,***,*** ** *** end-user ** **** **** of ******** ******* *****.  They ***** **** ***** the ***** ** *** above ****** ******** *** only ** ********* **** was ******** ** **** of *** ******.  **** the **** ** **** these ******** ******* ***** it ** ******** **** bill ***** *** ******* of $**.  

****, *** ****** *** for *** ******* ** to *** **** *** integrator ***** *** ********* company *********** ** *** systems **** ****** ***** the ********* ** *** system ** *********** ** the *** ****.  ****** that **** ** **** contracts!  ** **#*, ** SSNs, ** ****, ** sensitive ********, ***.  *** that ***** *** ** added ** **** ** which ***** *** ***-***** Cyber ********* ****** ***** data ******** ****** ******* as ** **** ** part ** ***** ********** IT *********** *** *******.  (understanding *** ** **** changes **** ****** ****.)

 

***** ******,

*****, ****** *** ******** some ******* *********** ** response ** **** **** comment:

“******'* ********* ***** ** a ******** *****/*&* ****** which ****** ***'* ********** which ****** ****** ****.

  • **** ** ******* ** point. ***** ** *** a ***** **** ******* which ******** ***** **** when **** *** ********* separately – ***** ** gray **** *** ** long ** ***** ** gray **** **** **** will ****** ** *********** circumstances *** *** ******* when * ***** **** go ****, **** *** example * **** ** my ******** ********. ********* the ********* ** *********** filling ** *** **** and *********** *** ******-******** game **** *** ***** happens.

“**** ***** ******* ** be ****** "**** *** **** ******** from ** *** ****** you **** ** ******* in *** *****." ** **** *** two ******** ******** **** they ***** ********* ****** right?”

  • **** ** *** *******. I ** ************ **** purchase *** ****** **** is * ******** ****** form **** ******** *** both *** ***** *** Tech *&* ******** ** one. ** ***** ******** we *** **** ** craft **** **** ***** coverage ***** *** **** technology ******* *******, ****** of ********, ****** ** hardware ************/******, ** **** as ****** **** ***** monitoring ********. * ** recommending ******* ********** *** ******** ******** for *** ***** *** E&O. ** **** *** separate, ********* *** ******* is ******* ******* ******** and ********* ** * more ********* ****. ************, both ***** ******** ******** have ** “***** ********* clause” ***** ** *** I ********** *** ******* causing ******* ****** *** to ***** *******. ******* wants ** *** ***. Also, **** ***** *** separate ******** ** ******* see **** **** ***** the *&* ** ***** package ****** (***** ** very ******* ******** ******** to * ******** *****/*&* form */ * ********* market **’* *********) *** they **** * ***** cyber ***-** ** **** cyber ********** ******* **** doesn’t **** **** **** they **** *** ***** also *** *********** **** in *** ***** ** error ** ***** ******** or ******* **** *** to ** **** ******* or ******* ******** **********, which ** ******** * more *** **** ****** occurrence. *** *************, **** people ** ******* **** those *** ***** ***** listed *** ** ******** cyber ******** **** **** merely ********* *** ******* of **** * ****-******* cyber ******** ****** **** like.

 

****, *** ** *** below *** **** ***** Cyber ********* *** ***** is * *** ******* here.

  • ***** **** *** ********
  • ********* ********* ***** * data ******
  • ********* ******** ********** ** affected *********
  • ********** *********** ****
  • ********* ******* ******** *******

 

***** ********* **** **** to ** ********* *** looked ** ********** **** business ************ ***** (***** can ** **** ***** losses), **** ** ****** customers *** ** *** hacking *****, ****** ********* expenses ** **** ********** communicate ****** ****** ***********, cyber ***** ******** *** to ********** ****** ****** for ******* ******** ** wire *********, ******** ****** expenses ** ********* *** scope ** ******** ****** recovering/repairing ****, ******** *** cyber *********/********** ******* *** recovery, ***.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

ADT And 'The Defenders' Silent About Massive Complaints on Feb 14, 2019
ADT's largest dealer, "The Defenders" has been the subject of a massive number of complaints over many years and many forums, most recently a CBS...
Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Insurance Startup Coalition Profile on Mar 20, 2019
Many industry people believe cybersecurity insurance is not worth it, as the voting and debate in our Cybersecurity Insurance For Security...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
UK Installer CCTV Aware - Flat Pricing, No Salespeople on Apr 10, 2019
This is a different kind of company. They do flat pricing, they do not have any salespeople and 50% of their sales are sold and booked...
NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
'Independent' Security Consultant Organization Sells Off Speaking Slots To Manufacturers on May 10, 2019
The International Association of Professional Security Consultants (IAPSC) have sold numerous speaking slots to manufacturers. This is part of...
Inside Look Into Scam Market Research on May 17, 2019
Scam market research has exploded over the last few years becoming the most commonly cited 'statistics' for most industries, despite there clearly...
Security Dealer 'Social Media Contractor' Program on Jun 25, 2019
A $20,000 video surveillance system can be yours for free if you are willing to post on social media about the security dealer. Good deal, bad...
Alarm Veteran "Demands A Criminal Investigation" Of UL on Oct 18, 2019
The Interceptor's Project pressure against UL continues to rise. Following Keith Jentoft's allegation that "UL Has Blood On Their Hands", Jentoft...
ADT Acquires Much Maligned "Defenders" on Jan 07, 2020
"The Defenders" has the dubious distinction of being ADT's largest partner and a long history of customer and employee complaints and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hazardous & Explosion Proof Access Control Tutorial on Feb 27, 2020
Controlling access to hazardous environments requires equipment meeting specific ratings that certify they will not start fires or will not...
Motorola / Avigilon Drops ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
Motorola Solutions has pulled out of ISC West 2020 effective immediately, because of coronavirus concerns, IPVM has learned. This is done amidst...
Cancel or Not? Industry Split Over ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
The industry is split, polarized, over whether ISC West 2020 should run or be canceled. New IPVM survey results of 400+ respondents show heated...
Coronavirus Hits Sony, Bosch Says Switch on Feb 26, 2020
Sony's fall in video surveillance has been severe over the past decade. Now, they may be done. In this note, we examine Bosch's new...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing deep learning offers. But what are actually integrator's...
Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London police, but this time the system was thwarted by technical problems and...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new IPVM test results show cause major problems for facial recognition...
Every VMS Will Become a VSaaS on Feb 21, 2020
VMS is ending. Soon every VMS will be a VSaaS. Competitive dynamics will be redrawn. What does this mean? VMS Historically...
Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance on Feb 20, 2020
This is the last chance to join IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the...