Japanese Stores Facial Recognition Sharing

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Apr 21, 2014

A controversy is brewing in Japan after a newspaper was tipped off about a practice stores use to combat shoplifting. A network of stores uses facial recognition technology to tag customers as shoplifters and relay that information other stores. In this post we examine the practice and compare it to similar U.S. efforts.

* *********** ** ******* ** ***** ***** * ********* *** tipped *** ***** * ******** ****** *** ** ****** ***********. A ******* ** ****** **** ****** *********** ********** ** *** customers ** *********** *** ***** **** *********** ***** ******. ** this **** ** ******* *** ******** *** ******* ** ** similar *.*. *******.

[***************]

**********

***** ******** ************ ******* ************ ****** ** *** ***** ************ **** **** ********* ****** recognition ******* ** ******* ****** ** *********** ** ********* ***** for **********. ***** ****** *** ******** **** * ******** *** all ****** ** *** ******* *** **** **** ****** *********** systems. *** ****** ***** ***** ******** ****** **** * ********** or ******* ******** ***** **** *** *****.

*** ******* ******* ***** **** **** ***** ** * *****, but **** **** *** ***** ****** ** ******** ** *** database. **** *** *** ******** ****** ** “*******” ** ****** in *** *******.

Japan ******* ********

*** ***** **** *** ******** ********* **** **** ***** *** Personal *********** ********** ********* ******** ** ******** *** ********** ******** *********** ***** ** not ** ** ********** ***** *******. ******* *** ****** ***** ****** *** ** a ********* ** **** ***.

* ****** *** ********* ***** ** **** *** ******** ** concerning ******* ** ***** ***** ******** ** *** ******* ******** or ** ********** **** ******** ****** **** **** ***** **** to *** ** ******* ** *********** ***** ** *** ******** there ** ** *** *** **** ** ******.

***** *** **** ********* ****** **** ********. **** **** *** story ****, ***** ******** *** ***** ***** **** ************ ******* and ******** ** ***** ****** ***** **** ************ ******* -- not ************ ****** ****** ***** ******** ** ****-** ****** **** driver's ******** ** ******** ****** *** *******.

Sharing ********** ****** ** *** *.*.

** ********, *** ******** ** ******* ****** ***** ****** ****** is ****** ** *** ****** ******. **’* *** ** *** form ** ****** *********** **********, *** ***** ** ** *********** sharing ****** *** *** ***** ********* ***** **** *** ***** video, ****** *** ************ ** *********** **** *** ******* ** help ****** ********* ****** *****.

* **** *************** ******** **** ** **** *** **** ****** in *** *.*. *** * *****: ****** ************ ********* ** images ** *********** ** ***** ********* ** *** ****.

******* ********** ** **** ** *** *.*., **** ******* **** caught *********** ****** ****** **** **** * ***** ** **** when ****'** ****** *** *** **** ** * *******-**** **** database ** ***** **** ** ******** ******. ** *** **** of *** ******** *******, ****** ***'* **** ***** ****** *** being *********.

Hard ** **** **** ****** *** ***** *** **********

** *** **** ********* ** **** *** ***** ****** *** *** technology. *** ***** **** *** *** **** ******* ***** *** technology ** **** *** ** *** ****** ***** ** ** IPVM ********* ******* ************ (**** *** *** *****) ** *****. None ** **** **** **** **** ***** **** ******** ** declined ** ******. *** *** ***** **** *** ****** ***** 50 ********* ********* *** ***** *** **********.

******** **** ********** ***** ** **** ** *** ************ ****** in *** *****, ** *** ***** ** ** ********* ******* to ***** ***** ****** *** ** *********** *** ****** ** shoplifters?

Comments (5)

Suppose that magically (1) only shoplifters and no others were identified as risks and included in the database, and (2) erroneous matches never occurred. If this were the case, then it seems not unreasonable that high risk individuals should be closely monitored to mitigate losses.

On the other hand, suppose that (1) innocents are often erroneously or even maliciously identified as shoplifters and included in the database, and/or (2) erroneous database matches often mis-identify unrelated shoppers as risks. If this were the case, then the approach seems unreasonable and also counter-productive in terms of allocation of scarce retailer resources.

If the truth lies somewhere in between, at a minimum, the inability of databased suspects to understand or address systemic errors seems problematic. What indignities is an innocent likely to be subjected to, beyond closer scrutiny while shopping? Will these databases make it difficult for wrongly accused to get a job or a clearance because security investigations and pre-employment screenings use information from these databases? At a minimum, isn't it likely that job seekers at those retail facilities will walk through a monitored area and that management will be notified if they are flagged as a high shoplifting risk?

Also, I might be more sanguine if we didn't have the example of the do not fly list. I expect that in many cases it performed as intended, but the press indicated that some innocents were inconvenienced while growing pains were addressed, though I haven't heard of any issues in a while now. By its very nature, it seems the affected parties learned about and consequently had at least some form of recourse, although (for example) losing non-refundable tickets and non-refundable accommodation down-payments and then, three months later, having one's name removed from the list does not seem at all equitable. In the case of this retail shoplifters list, one could be even more powerfully negatively affected yet have no idea of the source of negative information. For example, an innocent person wrongly flagged as a suspect might never be called back after every employment interview, yet never understand the problem that needed to be addressed. Even if the source were discovered and even if the list were eventually corrected, would the reputation ever be rehabilitated? Would the losses suffered during the erroneous blacklisting ever be compensated? But more vigorous loss recovery options could increase resistance to ever acknowledging and correcting an error in the first place.

For a somewhat related issue, you might take a look at Spiceworks' recent discussions on issues associated with the way IP blacklisting is currently managed.

P.S. This was a fun article with interesting implications. Keep up the great work, IPVM!

I blieve that if a shopper is prepared to enter someones premises with the intention of helping him/herself to thier property, he forfeits the right to maintain the privacy of his personal identityl, period.

It doesn't say that the suspected thieves are subjected to any sort of mistreatment, right? It just alerts LP that a suspicious person is in your store and they should keep a close eye on them. If that's the case, no harm, no foul.

Now, if these suspected individuals are harrased or intercepted at the door, then you might have something to gripe about.

Most Privacy laws require the holder of personal information to advise the person that the holder has the information and how it is being used. But, if a facial image has been provided to the police as evidence of a crime, it would be inappropriate. and possibly unlawful, to advise the person in the photo that the holder or the police have the evidence.

Prviacy laws allow Personal information to be collected so long as there is a 'necessity' for the information. It is appropriate for a person or a company to protect themselves from crime by circulating the photo to staff, as well as warn other potential victims, otehr shops, of the threat. Best to use the term 'alleged' before the description of the criminal activity.

"Most Privacy laws require the holder of personal information to advise the person that the holder has the information and how it is being used."

This depends on the country. In the US, there's really no law regulating / stoping use of such information. In Europe and Commonwealth countries, the opposite tends to be true.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Facial Recognition

Akuvox Intercom Profile on Dec 06, 2018
Akuvox, a Chinese manufacturer of VoIP products, is expanding heavily into Video Intercom products with disruptive pricing targeted for commercial...
No GDPR Penalties For UK Swann 'Spying Hack' on Nov 20, 2018
The UK’s data protection agency has closed its investigation into Infinova-owned Swann Security UK, the ICO confirmed to IPVM, deciding to take “no...
ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Final Report on Nov 16, 2018
This is our second (updated) and final show report from ISC East. ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed...
Facial Detection Tested on Nov 16, 2018
Facial detection and recognition are increasingly offered by video surveillance manufacturers. Facial detection detects faces in an image/video...
Huawei To Be “Top Three Global Position” in Video Surveillance on Oct 29, 2018
Huawei - China’s biggest networking gear and smartphone maker - plans to become one of the top three global video surveillance manufacturers in...
Axxon Face Search Tested on Oct 26, 2018
AxxonSoft has brought facial recognition to their Axxon Next VMS for free with the simply named Face Search, claiming to allow users to find...
When Your Salesperson Creates An International Incident (Amazon / ICE) on Oct 23, 2018
Having your salespeople be aggressive and go after big accounts is a virtue, mostly. On occasions, it can cause problems. A new case involves...
Dahua Face Recognition Camera Tested on Oct 15, 2018
Dahua has been one of the industry's most vocal proponents of the value that AI creates: As part of this, Dahua has released a facial...
Evidence Of Hikvision's Involvement With Xinjiang IJOP And Re-Education Camps on Oct 02, 2018
IPVM reveals as-yet unreported details about Hikvision’s activities in Xinjiang - a region of China where massive human rights abuses are being...
ASIS GSX 2018 Show Report on Sep 25, 2018
In the first major US show since the US government ban of Dahua and Hikvision was passed into law, the mega Chinese companies were in retreat and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

2019 Access Control Book Released on Dec 12, 2018
This is the best, most comprehensive access control book in the world, based on our unprecedented research and testing has been significantly...
Huawei Hisilicon Quietly Powering Tens of Millions of Western IoT Devices on Dec 12, 2018
Huawei Hisilicon chips are powering, at least, tens of millions of Western IoT devices, such as IP cameras and surveillance recorders, a fact that...
FLIR Launches Body Cameras Unified With VMS (TruWitness) on Dec 11, 2018
While FLIR is best known for their thermal cameras, now they have expanded into body cameras, launching TruWITNESS, a public safety focused body...
Startup Sunflower Labs' Autonomous Drone Security System on Dec 11, 2018
Startup Sunflower Labs is claiming a unique design on a home security system, combining autonomous drones and 'Sunflower' sensors. Imagine an...
The 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide on Dec 10, 2018
The 300 page, 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide, covers the key events and the future of the video surveillance market, is now available,...
Multi-Factor Access Control Authentication Guide on Dec 10, 2018
Can a stranger use your credentials? One of the oldest problems facing access control is making credentials as easy to use as keys, but restricting...
Top 2019 Trend - AI Video Analytics on Dec 10, 2018
160+ Integrators answered: What do you think the top industry trend will be in 2019? Why? AI / video analytics was the run-away winner with...
AV Tech Company Profile on Dec 07, 2018
Taiwanese manufacturer AV Tech's revenue declined ~70% since 2012. Planning a comeback, AV Tech spoke to IPVM about their opportunities and...
Ubiquiti $79 Flex IP Camera Tested on Dec 07, 2018
U.S. Manufacturer Ubiquiti has released a 1080p, integrated IR IP camera, selling it directly for $79, making this one of the least expensive IP...
Infinova's Xinjiang Business Examined on Dec 07, 2018
As pressure mounts for companies to stop doing business in China’s Xinjiang region amid a severe human rights crisis, IPVM has found Infinova sold...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact