Cisco Surrenders Access Control

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Apr 11, 2016

After a history of errors, Cisco has finally raised the white flag in access.

But in a smart move, they have partnered with a veteran access brand, Identiv, to take things over.

In this note, we examine how Cisco has changed things up, look at the new Identiv replacement, see what options existing Cisco users have, and evaluate potential market impact.

***** * ******* ** ******, ***** *** ******* ****** *** white **** ** ******.

*** ** * ***** ****, **** **** ********* **** * veteran ****** *****, *******, ** **** ****** ****.

** **** ****, ** ******* *** ***** *** ******* ****** up, **** ** *** *** ******* ***********, *** **** ******* existing ***** ***** ****, *** ******** ********* ****** ******.

[***************]

Cisco's ****** ******

***** ********* * ***** ********* ******** ****** ******** ** ****, there **** **** ** ***** ******* ** ***** ******** ****** Manager (****).  ******** ** * ******** ******** ********* ** * Cisco *********,  **** *** **** ** ********* *** ******* * line ** *****-*********** ** ***** ********** '********' *** *******, *** a ********** ********** ***** ****** ****** ********** **** ***** ***** branded *******.

*** ******* ********* ** *** ****** *** *** *********** *** a *********** *** *******, ** **** *** ****** **** ****************** hindered ** **** ** ********** ******* *******, *********** **** ********** security *******, *** ******** ****** ******** **** *********. *** ***** VARs, *** ************ ***** *****, *** **** ********* ** **** was ******* *** ************ **********, *******, *** ***********.

*********** ***** ******, **** *** ***** ******* ******** ****** ****** success ** ********** *********** ** *****, *** *** ******** *** largely ********** ** ** ************ *** **** ** * ********* perpetual ****** ** ************* ******** *********** ********.

New *********** **** *******

** ******* ****, ***** *** ********* * ****** '******** ***********' ***********, **** ***** ** *** ********** ****** ****** *** *** holder ******** ******, ************* * ********* ******** ** ********** *** ****-******** ****** *******.

** * *** ******** ************ ******** *** ****** ** ***** only, ******* *** ******** ********* ***** *****, **** * *** **** ************ ******** ***** ***** **** *** ********.  ***** ***** ** *** ***********, ******* ***** *** ******** the ****** *********** ******* ***** *** ***** *** *******.  ******** Identiv ******* *** *** ********* ** ******* ** ****** ***** unless ******** * ***** ***.

**** *** ***********, ***** ****** *********** ** ***** ***** *********, like *****'* ***** ********** ***, *** **** ******* **** '*** ********' ********* **** ***** VoIP/Telephony ********* *** ******** ***. ****** *** *****-*******, *** ******** integration ***, ******** **** *********, ******** ****** *******, *** *** powered *********** *** *** *********.

****** ***** ******* ******** *********** *** ******* **** *****'* *** (Internet ** **********) ******** **** ************ ******* ********* *******, *** no **** ******* **** ******* ****** '******* *******' *******.

******* ********* ******* ***** ****, ***** ****** ******* ** ****** dependent *** ********* ** *** ***** *** ** ****** ******* for ****** *******, ********* ~$*** - $**** *** ****.

Existing ******* ********* ** *******

*** *** ******** **** ********* ********* ******** ** *** ******** software *** ******** ** *** ***** ******, ******* **** ** the ****** ** *******. ***** *** ***** ** *** ***** partnership, ******* *** ****** ** ****** ************** ** *** *** all ******** *******, **** ** ******* ** *** ******* ** long ** ***** ******* ********** **** *** ***** *** ** effect. 

* ********* ******* ********* ** **** ******** **** ** ***** systems ** ***** ****** ***, *** *** *** ** ** formally *********.

Market ******

***** ***** ***** **** ** ****** ************* *** ********** *** nuance ** ******** ********, *** ******* *** ********* ******-***** ** commercial *** ****-*** ** ******** *** ********.  

********* *** *********** ********* **** ******** *** *** *****-******* *** poorly ******* ******* ** **** ********** ******* *** * *** step.  ******* * ******* **** ********** *** * *****-****** ** the ******** ******** ***** ** ******* *** ****, *** **** Identiv ******* ******* *********** *** *******, *** ****** ***** ***** very ********** *** *****'* ******** ** *** ******** ****** ******.

Cisco *****'* *** *****

******* ************: *** ******* **** *** ****** ******* ********* ** ** *****'* limitation ** ********* ******** ****** ** **** ***** ***** *********,****** ***.  ***** *** ****** ******* *** ******* ****** *****-****** ** that ***** ********** ********, **** ***** **** ********* ** **** purchase **** ***** ***.  ***** **** *****'* **** ***** ******* found ** ***, *** ******** ** ***** **** **** **** 'open' ****** ************ *** ********* ** ****.

**** ** ******* *********: ******* *** **** ** ******* ** *** ***** ****, especially ***** *** *** *** ** ******* ********** ******** ****** line, **** ******* *** ******* ** * ******** ****** ****** hesitant ** *** *** ******** ********, **** **** *** ******** the ***** **** * ********** ****** **********.  ********, ********** *** ****** *** ****** ** ** * great ** ******** ******** ** ** ********* ** ******** ****** success, ** *** ******* ****** *** ********* ****** *** * niche *** ***** ***, * **** ** ******* ** *** ***** *********** ****** **** **** ****** ******* ****.

Comments (9)

"While Cisco seems bent to always underestimate the complexity and nuance of physical security"

From speaking with them at this show and on previous occasions, it is actually worse than that. The typical Cisco thought process is that bad cameras or controllers are not a problem, because the value is in their integration with the network, other Cisco products, etc.

The problem, of course, is this is like a chef who thinks they can cook a great meal with spam and rotten eggs. You might be a great chef but the ingredients play a critical role in the final meal.

Hey don't pick on SPAM. Rotten eggs, maybe.

Still the Lindsay Lohan of the physical security industry.

I was going to quote the same line... "While Cisco seems bent to always underestimate the complexity and nuance of physical security"

It seems like you have two opposing forces within Cisco, which is not unbelievable when you have a behemoth sized company. At the very least, most Cisco management seems only interested in Physical Security as a segue to sell their IT network line products, with one side saying, "It's just security stuff, we know how to do this because we're Cisco" and the other side trying to say back, "No, this is a different animal, and it's not the same thing and we need to try something better."

I wondered if they were ever going to do something with that.

It's not like Cisco has to go cold calling; they have existing customers who know them, like them, trust them -- and are already in the habit of giving them money. And since Cisco also gains from the infrastructure *around* the physical security sale -- switches, routers, storage (TONS of storage!) -- their margins on the PhySec stuff don't have to be all that ginormous. Regardless, it's not like Cisco customers are the type to shop around for the lowest price. All Cisco has to do is offer a quality product! Unfortunately, they insist upon developing/owning it themselves instead of assembling a best-of-breed lineup of what this industry already has to offer. It's the Cisco ego that gets in their way.

However, it is unlikely they would ever hire a product director from outside their industry that would dare tell them that.

And if they can't figure out access control, they'd best stay away from IP video anyway -- it's a lot more 1s and 0s.

Has this arrangement now ended too?

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/physical-security/physical-access-manager/eos-eol-notice-c51-738080.html

Hello Graham:

We've reached out to Identiv and Cisco for comment, I'll post feedback when they respond.

Identiv responded:

"We did make some changes to how the system components were bundled and ordered through the Cisco internal system, which required that new internal Cisco part numbers be created.

The only way Cisco could do that was to discontinue the existing part numbers, and create new ones.

What you saw was the announcement for the discontinuation of the part numbers that were changing. Their EOL does not reflect the new Cisco part numbers that were created to replace those that were discontinued."

and went on to affirm the partnership in the near future:

"ICPAM is and will remain a product sold only through Cisco and their channel partners. The current offering from Identiv includes the ICPAM software, our edge controllers, Identiv TS readers and cards. By end of January be announcing an expansion to that line."

In summary, Identiv says this EOL is a part-number administrative change only.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Access Control

Axis Releases First New Access Controller In 5 Years (A1601) on Jun 15, 2018
It has been 5 years since Axis 2013 entry in the physical access control market, with the A1001 (IPVM test). Now, Axis has released its second...
Access Control - Time & Attendance, Mustering and Mantraps Guide on Jun 13, 2018
Electronic access offers features that traditional mechanical locks cannot. While these features may not be as fundamental as keeping doors secure,...
ReconaSense - The AI / Access Control / Analytics / IoT / Video Company Profile on Jun 12, 2018
One company's ISC West booth stood out for displaying a light-up tower of buzzwords. The company, ReconaSense, pledged to be 'making sense of it...
The Benefits of An Access Control Test Door on Jun 08, 2018
Security system dealers can benefit from having their own access control test door both for demonstrations and training. Inside, we explain the...
Princeton Identity Access 200 Iris Scanners Examined on Jun 05, 2018
Iris recently registered a big jump as a preferred biometric in our Favorite Biometrics survey, but access-ready options can be difficult to...
Keypads For Access Control Tutorial on May 31, 2018
Keypad readers present huge risks to even the best access systems. If deployed improperly, keypads let people through locked doors almost as if...
Ambitious Mobile Access Startup: Openpath on May 24, 2018
This team sold their last startup for hundreds of millions of dollars, now they have started Openpath to become a rare access control small...
Cybersecurity for IP Video Surveillance Guide on May 18, 2018
Keeping surveillance networks secure can be a daunting task, but there are several methods that can greatly reduce risk, especially when used in...
Forced Entry / Duress Access Tutorial on May 17, 2018
Even though access control normally keeps people safe, tragedies have revealed a significant issue. If users are forced to unlock doors for...
Worst Manufacturer Technical Support 2018 on May 16, 2018
5 manufacturers stood out as providing the worst technical support to 190+ integrators in new IPVM results. These integrators answered: In the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

IPVM Vulnerability Scanner Released on Jun 18, 2018
IPVM is proud to announce video surveillance's first and only cybersecurity vulnerability scanner. This tool allows quickly and simply...
Hikvision Corrects False Cybersecurity Announcement on Jun 18, 2018
Hikvision has corrected a false cybersecurity announcement that claimed a British government-sponsored program endorsed the cybersecurity of...
July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 16, 2018
The last chance to save $50 on registration is this Thursday, June 21st. Register now and save. This is the only networking course designed...
The Dumb Ones: PSA's Bozeman On Cybersecurity on Jun 15, 2018
The smart ones are the hundred people who flew to Denver and spent $500+ on a 1.5-day conference featuring Dahua as a 'cyber responsible partner',...
Amazon Ring Launches $10 Monthly Professional Alarm Monitoring on Jun 15, 2018
Amazon's Ring has announced an alarm system with 24/7 professional alarm monitoring for $10 per month, a fraction of the $30+ per month traditional...
Axis Releases First New Access Controller In 5 Years (A1601) on Jun 15, 2018
It has been 5 years since Axis 2013 entry in the physical access control market, with the A1001 (IPVM test). Now, Axis has released its second...
Hikvision 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (DS-2CD63C2F-IV) on Jun 14, 2018
Hikvision's DS-2CD63C2F-IV is their flagship panoramic camera, with a 12MP imager, 15m integrated IR, smart codec, and more. We tested the 63C2 in...
Four Major Outdoor Camera Install Problems on Jun 14, 2018
Over 140 integrators told us the top four camera installation mistakes that lead to unexpected problems and failures. Their comments often...
Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jun 14, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer...
China Public Video Surveillance Guide: From Skynet to Sharp Eyes on Jun 14, 2018
China is expanding its video surveillance network to achieve “100%” nationwide coverage by 2020, including facial recognition capabilities and a...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact