Cisco Admits Failure, Partners with Pelco (v2)

By: John Honovich, Published on Sep 20, 2009

Less than 3 years ago, Cisco threatened the physical security industry with disruption and innovation. Spending more than $100 Million USD, Cisco bought companies manufacturing video management systems and encoders as well as developing their own IP/HD camera line. Pundits predicted Cisco would crush the dumb security dinosarours.

Today, Cisco announces a partnership [link no longer available] with incumbent CCTV leader Pelco. The Press Release frames it as a "co-branding" of Pelco's Sarix cameras with future potential for incorporating Cisco's "networking functionality" which seems to be basically an OEM of Pelco's Sarix line. This follows Cisco's partnership with behemoth security integrator/installer ADT earlier this year.

Here's the video of the announcement at ASIS:

Of course, Cisco did not admit failure - this is only my interpretation. Giant conglomerates do not admit failure but when you start off with plans to dominate an 'antiquated' industry and then a few years later decide to partner with the leaders of that industry, well then, you failed.

Earlier this year, we examined Cisco's struggles. Since then, Cisco has undergone an internal reorganization plus the CEO of 1 of their 2 video surveillance acquisitions, Pete Jankowski [link no longer available], left Cisco and has started a new video surveillance company.

While Pelco's partnering is a part of a coherent long term strategy of broad base partnering, Cisco's recent tactics are harder to understand. They obviously have a lot of money but they still seem to be trying to figure out how to be successful in video surveillance.

Update #1: IT analyst claims Cisco may buy Pelco (premium)

Update #2: Official response from Cisco below in the comments

This is further proof of Cisco's struggles - both on a technical and marketing level. If Cisco had the product or the sales strength to grow quickly in video surveillance, there's no way they would have resorted to co-branding with a legacy incumbent. Indeed, when they first entered the market, they obviously rejected this approach pushing ahead with their own VMS and cameras.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

3 months ago, I conducted a partial test of the Cisco 4300 which revealed 2 problems that put the test of an indefinite hold:

  • The camera had significant problems dealing with anything but perfect bandwidth availability. Rather than dynamically adjusting the quality or frame of the stream (like every major IP camera manufacture), Cisco's camera would immediately display green film overlay rendering the image unusable. This was confirmed as a design issue with Cisco's camera.
  • Secondly, the camera was only supported by Cisco's VMS. We discussed setting up Cisco's VMS but I abandoned that when I learned that Cisco's VMS only runs on one distribution of Linux (SUSE). This is certainly in stark comparison to mainstream VMSes that almost all run on Windows. Even the ones that run on Linux generally are supported on a variety of distributions.

These types of problems were part of fundamental issues Cisco faced. While adopting Sarix's cameras should help rectify these issues, it does so at a significant cost in Cisco's overall competitiveness and value proposition. Secondly, the Sarix line is fairly limited, only consisting of a fixed and dome series up to 3 MP. Pelco's IP camera portfolio is still far behind Axis.

Such a partnership also implies that Cisco is unwilling to acquire an IP camera provider, which would be a much cleaner and stronger way to compete directly in the market. If Cisco truly wants to win in video surveillance, they need to buy an IP camera manufacturer.

Additionally, Cisco continues to have challenges with their VMS product which has difficulty competing with the breadth of features offered by direct competitors like Milestone and Genetec (who of course keep on releasing new advances - e.g., ASIS announcements of SecurityCenter by Genetec and release 7.0 by Milestone). 

Meaning for IT/Security Convergence

Since Cisco is the standard bearer for IT convergence, such actions speak negatively to the force of IT convergence. However, this is likely more of a result of Cisco's approach rather than the failings of IT convergence.

It now should be clear that pushing inferior products at higher prices does not work even if you 'own' the IT department. By contrast, companies like Milestone and Genetec, with much more mature products and sensible approaches to the market, continue to grow.

Impact on Pelco

For Pelco, this is likely to have some upside and little downside. First, Pelco essentially gains an OEM re-seller who should be able to sell cameras into a channel where they do not traditionally focus. Secondly, it provides some validation to IT organizations for Pelco sales in general. If Cisco can eventually add some additional network functionality, that may be a bonus. However, it's unlikely that Cisco can add dramatically better networking capabilities. The most realistic option is that Cisco incorporates their MediaNet protocol into Sarix cameras. This would help drive Cisco-centric solutions.

Impact on Axis

Axis is the big winner here. First, many saw Cisco as this powerful threat to Axis. Clearly this confirms they have not been. Plus, it is going to take a year or so for the Cisco/Pelco partnership to ramp up. In the meantime, Axis has a big head start and continues to release more IP cameras and innovative offerings, increasing the gap with Cisco/Pelco. Furthermore, "strategic technology "partnerships that require co-development of products between two huge companies face major organizational risks.

Cisco/Pelco needs to win the high end/premium market/sophisticated buyer segment of the market. Even with them coming together, unless and until they develop substantially more and better products, they remain at a clear technical disadvantage to Axis.

Impact on Genetec / Milestone/ Large Scale VMS

Genetec and Milestone also benefit these actions. Cisco is struggling just as much with their VMS system as their cameras. With Cisco distracted with this partnership, it is hard to see how they are going to advance their VMS system. Perhaps Cisco will eventually complete a similar agreement with one of the mainstream VMS companies. However, this essentially reduces Cisco to a very large systems integrator, adding questionable value beyond brand.

 

When Cisco pulled out of ISC West, Steve Hunt hoped [link no longer available] that "Cisco is buckling down and coming up with some excellent innovations for us and will unveil them later this year." It's painfully obvious this has not happened.

Good news for everyone else in the industry - bad news for Cisco.

6 reports cite this report:

Cisco Surveillance Strategy Shift on Sep 19, 2011
Where is Cisco going in the physical security market? In this note, we...
Cisco MediaNet for IP Video Surveillance Examined on Nov 14, 2010
Now more than 4 years from Cisco's first foray into the video surveillance...
Surveillance Manufacturer Trends 2010 on Oct 24, 2010
Trends and strategies in the video surveillance market are shifting. In this...
Sales Progress Report on Dec 01, 2009
In an interview with Security Sales and Integration, Cisco commented on sales...
What Video Surveillance Company Should Cisco Buy? on Oct 14, 2009
Buying companies is at the core of Cisco's growth strategy. While Cisco has...
New Producs Directory ASIS 2009 Finalized on Sep 24, 2009
This report examines 37 new products announced for ASIS 2009. It includes...

Related Reports

ISC West 2020 Finally Cancelled on Jun 25, 2020
ISC West has now been cancelled for the third time, now for all of...
Cisco Video Surveillance Is Dead, Long Live Cisco Meraki Video Surveillance on Feb 11, 2020
A dozen years ago much of the industry thought that Cisco was destined to...
USA's Feevr Thermal Temperature System Examined on Mar 31, 2020
This US company has burst on to the scene, brashly naming itself 'feevr' and...
Cisco Acquiring Fluidmesh on Apr 09, 2020
Cisco announced it is acquiring niche wireless manufacturer...
Verkada Raises $80 Million, Triples Valuation To $1.6 Billion on Jan 30, 2020
Verkada's rocketing valuation continues. 9 months ago, they got a...
Cobalt Robots Respond To Coronavirus on Apr 20, 2020
Startup Cobalt Robotics is responding to coronavirus with new features...
SenseB4 Presents Cloud Network Device Monitoring on Jun 09, 2020
SenseB4 presented its cybersecurity and network health monitoring products at...
Cast Presents PoE Perimeter Lighting on Apr 28, 2020
Cast Lighting presented its PoE powered Perimeter fence system during the...
Hikvision Fever Screening Thermal Solutions Examined on Apr 13, 2020
Hikvision is marketing "safer, faster, smarter" with their Fever Screening...
Startup Videoloft Presents Cloud Storage on May 27, 2020
Videoloft presented offsite cloud storage at the May 2020 IPVM Startups...
Anyvision Layoffs on Mar 19, 2020
Anyvision has conducted a layoff, citing the impact of coronavirus, joining a...
PRC Warns Against China Video Surveillance Hacks, Hikvision Targeted on Feb 14, 2020
Hackers are targeting China video surveillance manufacturers and systems,...
JCI "Fever Camera" Partners With China TVT on May 19, 2020
Johnson Controls (JCI) is the next big player to get into the 'fever camera'...
NetApp Presents Hybrid Cloud Video Archive on May 11, 2020
NetApp presented its hybrid S3 cloud video archive at the April 2020 IPVM New...
Openpath Presents Two Door PoE Controller on May 21, 2020
Openpath presented its new PoE controller at the May 2020 IPVM Startups...

Recent Reports

SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 200 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...
US Startup Fever Inspect Examined on Aug 03, 2020
Undoubtedly late to fever cameras, this US company, Fever Inspect, led by a...
Motorola Solutions Acquires Pelco on Aug 03, 2020
Motorola Solutions has acquired Pelco, pledging to bring blue back and make...
False: Verkada: "If You Want To Remote View Your Cameras You Need To Punch Holes In Your Firewall" on Jul 31, 2020
Verkada falsely declared to “3,000+ customers”, “300 school districts”, and...
US GSA Explains NDAA 889 Part B Blacklisting on Jul 31, 2020
With the 'Blacklist Clause' going into effect August 13 that bans the US...
Access Control Online Show July 2020 - On-Demand Recording of 45+ Manufacturers Presentations on Jul 30, 2020
The show featured 48 Access Control presentations, all now recorded and...
Face Detection Shootout - Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jul 30, 2020
Face detection analytics are available from a number of manufactures...
Sunell is The First China Manufacturer to Market NDAA Compliance on Jul 30, 2020
Most China manufacturers are going to be impacted by the NDAA 'Blacklist...