US Gov China Commission (CECC) Cites IPVM on Hikvision

By: Charles Rollet, Published on Jan 09, 2020

The US Congress agency monitoring PRC human rights has cited IPVM's coverage of Hikvision's extensive Xinjiang activities in its flagship annual report.

The report, which mentions Hikvision almost two dozen times, urges further US government action on the Xinjiang human rights crisis, calling for even tougher sanctions on companies "directly complicit".

In this post, we examine the report's citing of IPVM along with its broader impact, including:

  • Report Background
  • IPVM Work On Hikvision Cited
  • IPVM Coverage Of Infinova Cited
  • Hikvision Mentioned Many Times
  • Tiandy Called Out As Well
  • CECC Recommendations: Magnitsky Sanctions, Export Controls
  • Hikvision Declines to Comment
  • Conclusion


Yesterday the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) released its 2019 report to the Congress and the President, which is the bipartisan agency's main purpose. While the report covers issues like Tibet and the Hong Kong protests, Xinjiang received heavy coverage as well - Uyghur activists even attended the report's release:

IPVM Work on Hikvision Cited

IPVM's article Evidence Of Hikvision's Involvement With Xinjiang IJOP And Re-Education Camps was cited by the CECC:

IPVM Infinova Coverage Mention

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

CECC cited IPVM's report on Infinova's Xinjiang activities as well:

Hikvision Called Out Many Times

In total, the CECC report mentioned Hikvision almost two dozen times, indicating the firm has become the one of the most visible symbols of Chinese government surveillance/rights abuses. In one passage, the CECC even used Hikvision as an example of businesses being complicit in "egregious human rights violations":

Tiandy Called Out As Well

The CECC mentioned Tiandy three times for selling "technology to Chinese authorities", stating "the government uses this technology to surveil rights advocates and others the government views as threats." The Tiandy mention is due to a Bloomberg report noting that Tiandy's founder is now a billionaire.

CECC Recommends Magnitsky Sanctions

Without mentioning Hikvision explicitly, the CECC recommended Global Magnitsky sanctions on companies "directly complicit" in Xinjiang:

Impose Global Magnitsky sanctions on both Chinese government officials carrying out severe human rights abuses in the XUAR as well as the companies directly complicit in those abuses.

Magnitsky sanctions are much tougher than the current sanctions in place against Hikvision; if passed, they would terminate Hikvision's USA presence altogether.

More Export Controls Urged

The CECC also recommends updating the ban on US firms selling China "crime control" equipment that was passed after the Tiananmen Square massacre. This would make it much harder for US companies to supply any Chinese surveillance firms, not just the ones sanctioned over Xinjiang like Hikvision/Dahua.

Hikvision Declines Comment

Hikvision told IPVM they decline to comment on the CECC report.


The CECC report is bad news for Hikvision, indicating that the company has become a prominent example of PRC government surveillance in Xinjiang; notably, Dahua was not even mentioned in the report although it also has extensive Xinjiang activities.

More broadly, if the report's recommendations are acted upon, even further restrictions on US business with Chinese security companies could very well be placed in the future. Considering these issues are anchored in human rights rather than technical/cybersecurity concerns, they are unlikely to go away anytime soon.

Comments (11)

Only IPVM Members may comment. Login or Join.

I'm trying to understand the Magnitsky Sanction part (Wikipedia link). Here's what I'm getting:

  • The Magnitsky Sanctions ban the subject from entering the United States or using the U.S. banking systems, effectively freezing their assets.
  • Magnitsky Sanctions are usually applied to individuals (it has been likened to punishing the Nazi prison staff). However, when Dan Gertler was sanctioned, many of his affiliated entities were listed as well.
  • Senator Marco Rubio and several other senators called for Magnitsky Sanctions against Chinese officials involved in Xinjiang in August 2018.

If only Hikvision executives were sanctioned (and the company itself was not), I haven't a clue how that would affect things.

Hi, thanks for your comment. That's a good question. IPVM covered this last year and, as we mentioned, Magnitsky sanctions on the company are very serious and would effectively end Hikvision's USA operations and probably cause issues with their international operations too. Why? Magnitsky sanctions mean:

  • A freeze on all Hikvision assets – from property to cash – in the United States
  • A prohibition on Hikvision transactions with US persons/companies
  • Possible suspension of Hikvision executives’ right to obtain visas to the US

If only Hikvision executives were sanctioned, the impact wouldn't be nearly as severe, and would amount to more of a PR problem. However, that specific option has never been floated before. And the Magnitsky legislation is clear that companies as well as persons can be sanctioned.

(Source: Executive Order 13818 expanding 2016’s Global Magnitsky Act.)

"Surveillance research firm" > "small time blog"

I value the actual research John is doing, he puts a lot of effort into making this information available and I think that we need that today. We know the installers and end-users aren't finding this information on their own.

Next time you're at a business that has Hikvision cameras installed ask them what they know about it, in my experience it is next to nothing. One business in particular, Mike's Carwash to be precise, merely covered up the Hikvision logo after we asked them about it!

One business in particular, Mike's Carwash to be precise, merely covered up the Hikvision logo after we asked them about it!

OEMs should be pissed. The Car Wash is stealing their business model.

Any guess on the likelihood of the Magnitsky sanctions actually being imposed?

Good question, but the likelihood of Magnitsky sanctions on Hikvision is very difficult to predict. The President/Congress are under no obligation to act upon the CECC's suggestions. My (subjective) guess is that this unless we see a significant escalation in US-China tensions, or a substantial worsening of the (already very bad) Xinjiang situation, this option remains unlikely although still possible.

I think it's much more likely that Magnitsky sanctions are first imposed on Chen Quanguo, the PRC official in charge of Xinjiang, and his direct associates.

From various conversations I had last year, I think there was some moderate, if not significant, part of the day-to-day security industry population that felt Hikvision was going to avoid any long-term impacts from the sanctions and scrutiny. It seems there was an opinion that felt Hikvision was "too big to fail" in a way, and through lobbying/etc., would get through this, maybe weakened and chastised a bit, but more or less in tact.

The pressure not only seems to be not letting up on them, but is increasing, or at least maintaining strong momentum. By extension, I think we may start to see some increases in R&D spending and new product releases at other security industry companies that have clawed back some revenue and margin now that they do not need to compete so directly with Hikvision, et al.

Overall, I think that 2020 will be a potentially good year for any security industry product that is not built around Huawei components.

Anyone using the FAV button?

Honeywell/Resideo has/ had substantial sales into the PRC wonder what they are doing about this. Another spin off?

Validation such as being cited by a government report that addresses human suffering must be a very rewarding aspect of IPVM's effort. That's the kind of reward not even money, or Mastercard, can buy. Congratulations, John.

Related Reports

Dahua Co-Founder Says Human Rights Sanctions Shows Strong Dahua Technology on Oct 29, 2019
Despite Dahua doing nearly a billion dollars of projects in Xinjiang, including building and operating police stations, Dahua not only denies 'any...
Government-Owned Hikvision Wants To Keep Politics Out Of Security on Oct 21, 2019
'Politics' made Hikvision the goliath it is today. It was PRC China 'politics' that created Hikvision, funded it, and blocked its foreign...
Dahua Celebrates PRC 70th Wearing Communist Party Hammer and Sickle on Oct 11, 2019
Dahua celebrated the PRC's 70th anniversary with a video of various Dahua employees wearing China Communist Party hammer and sickle pins as shown...
Hikvision And Dahua Sanctioned For Human Rights Abuses on Oct 07, 2019
In a groundbreaking move that will have drastic consequences across the video surveillance market, Dahua and Hikvision have been sanctioned by the...
Dahua And Hikvision Accept PRC Government Officials on Sep 26, 2019
Hikvision and Dahua are among the 100 companies accepting PRC government officials as part of a new initiative to boost manufacturing that has...
US State Department: "Chinese Tech Giants" "Tools of the Chinese Communist Party" on Sep 12, 2019
The US State Department has called out "Chinese tech giants" for being "tools of the Chinese Communist Party" in a blunt new speech that makes...
Hikvision Scrutinized In The Netherlands on Aug 15, 2019
Hikvision is facing unprecedented scrutiny in the Netherlands, at the same time the US government ban has taken effect. This week, a Dutch...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Hikvision VP On Muslim Oppression on May 14, 2019
Hikvision has won tens of millions of dollars, at least, in direct contracts with the Chinese government that oppresses Muslims, including a forced...
9 UK MPs Call Out Hikvision Over Human Rights Violations on Mar 26, 2019
A group of nine MPs in the UK has released a letter calling out Hikvision for its surveillance deals in Xinjiang and Tibet, alleging Hikvision...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Athena CEO Criticizes 'Deplorable' 'Nitpicking', IPVM Refutes on Mar 27, 2020
Athena Security's CEO Lisa Falzone has strongly objected to IPVM's reporting on Athena, calling it 'deplorable' and repeatedly criticizing IPVM's...
Hikvision Admits Sanctions Harming Its Financial Performance on Mar 27, 2020
While Hikvision initially downplayed being sanctioned for human rights abuses, the company is now admitting a significant impact in a new PRC...
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30 series cameras, claiming to deliver "sharp video quality even in poor...
Coronavirus Shuts Down ADT Door Knockers on Mar 26, 2020
Coronavirus has another victim - this time, alarm giant ADT has stopped all door to door sales. Door knockers are a critical but controversial...
Access Control Course Spring 2020 - Save $50 Last Day on Mar 26, 2020
Register Now - Spring 2020 Access Control Course. Today, March 26th is the last day to save $50. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access...
Convergint Coronavirus Cuts on Mar 25, 2020
One of the world's largest security integrators, Convergint, has made a major move to handle the impact of coronavirus, with cuts across the...
VSaaS 101 on Mar 25, 2020
Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS) is the common industry term for cloud video. But what does it mean? How does it all work? Inside this...
TVT / InVid Facial Recognition Tested on Mar 25, 2020
Facial recognition is frequently sold for thousands of dollars per channel but some China manufacturers are offering full facial recognition...
IPVM Launches On-Demand Courses on Mar 24, 2020
For nearly a decade, IPVM has been a leader in online live courses. Now, we have added on-demand versions for all courses. The same course...