US Gov China Commission (CECC) Cites IPVM on Hikvision

By: Charles Rollet, Published on Jan 09, 2020

The US Congress agency monitoring PRC human rights has cited IPVM's coverage of Hikvision's extensive Xinjiang activities in its flagship annual report.

The report, which mentions Hikvision almost two dozen times, urges further US government action on the Xinjiang human rights crisis, calling for even tougher sanctions on companies "directly complicit".

In this post, we examine the report's citing of IPVM along with its broader impact, including:

  • Report Background
  • IPVM Work On Hikvision Cited
  • IPVM Coverage Of Infinova Cited
  • Hikvision Mentioned Many Times
  • Tiandy Called Out As Well
  • CECC Recommendations: Magnitsky Sanctions, Export Controls
  • Hikvision Declines to Comment
  • Conclusion


Yesterday the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) released its 2019 report to the Congress and the President, which is the bipartisan agency's main purpose. While the report covers issues like Tibet and the Hong Kong protests, Xinjiang received heavy coverage as well - Uyghur activists even attended the report's release:

IPVM Work on Hikvision Cited

IPVM's article Evidence Of Hikvision's Involvement With Xinjiang IJOP And Re-Education Camps was cited by the CECC:

IPVM Infinova Coverage Mention

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

CECC cited IPVM's report on Infinova's Xinjiang activities as well:

Hikvision Called Out Many Times

In total, the CECC report mentioned Hikvision almost two dozen times, indicating the firm has become the one of the most visible symbols of Chinese government surveillance/rights abuses. In one passage, the CECC even used Hikvision as an example of businesses being complicit in "egregious human rights violations":

Tiandy Called Out As Well

The CECC mentioned Tiandy three times for selling "technology to Chinese authorities", stating "the government uses this technology to surveil rights advocates and others the government views as threats." The Tiandy mention is due to a Bloomberg report noting that Tiandy's founder is now a billionaire.

CECC Recommends Magnitsky Sanctions

Without mentioning Hikvision explicitly, the CECC recommended Global Magnitsky sanctions on companies "directly complicit" in Xinjiang:

Impose Global Magnitsky sanctions on both Chinese government officials carrying out severe human rights abuses in the XUAR as well as the companies directly complicit in those abuses.

Magnitsky sanctions are much tougher than the current sanctions in place against Hikvision; if passed, they would terminate Hikvision's USA presence altogether.

More Export Controls Urged

The CECC also recommends updating the ban on US firms selling China "crime control" equipment that was passed after the Tiananmen Square massacre. This would make it much harder for US companies to supply any Chinese surveillance firms, not just the ones sanctioned over Xinjiang like Hikvision/Dahua.

Hikvision Declines Comment

Hikvision told IPVM they decline to comment on the CECC report.


The CECC report is bad news for Hikvision, indicating that the company has become a prominent example of PRC government surveillance in Xinjiang; notably, Dahua was not even mentioned in the report although it also has extensive Xinjiang activities.

More broadly, if the report's recommendations are acted upon, even further restrictions on US business with Chinese security companies could very well be placed in the future. Considering these issues are anchored in human rights rather than technical/cybersecurity concerns, they are unlikely to go away anytime soon.

Comments (11)

Only IPVM PRO Members may comment. Login or Join.

I'm trying to understand the Magnitsky Sanction part (Wikipedia link). Here's what I'm getting:

  • The Magnitsky Sanctions ban the subject from entering the United States or using the U.S. banking systems, effectively freezing their assets.
  • Magnitsky Sanctions are usually applied to individuals (it has been likened to punishing the Nazi prison staff). However, when Dan Gertler was sanctioned, many of his affiliated entities were listed as well.
  • Senator Marco Rubio and several other senators called for Magnitsky Sanctions against Chinese officials involved in Xinjiang in August 2018.

If only Hikvision executives were sanctioned (and the company itself was not), I haven't a clue how that would affect things.

Hi, thanks for your comment. That's a good question. IPVM covered this last year and, as we mentioned, Magnitsky sanctions on the company are very serious and would effectively end Hikvision's USA operations and probably cause issues with their international operations too. Why? Magnitsky sanctions mean:

  • A freeze on all Hikvision assets – from property to cash – in the United States
  • A prohibition on Hikvision transactions with US persons/companies
  • Possible suspension of Hikvision executives’ right to obtain visas to the US

If only Hikvision executives were sanctioned, the impact wouldn't be nearly as severe, and would amount to more of a PR problem. However, that specific option has never been floated before. And the Magnitsky legislation is clear that companies as well as persons can be sanctioned.

(Source: Executive Order 13818 expanding 2016’s Global Magnitsky Act.)

"Surveillance research firm" > "small time blog"

I value the actual research John is doing, he puts a lot of effort into making this information available and I think that we need that today. We know the installers and end-users aren't finding this information on their own.

Next time you're at a business that has Hikvision cameras installed ask them what they know about it, in my experience it is next to nothing. One business in particular, Mike's Carwash to be precise, merely covered up the Hikvision logo after we asked them about it!

One business in particular, Mike's Carwash to be precise, merely covered up the Hikvision logo after we asked them about it!

OEMs should be pissed. The Car Wash is stealing their business model.

Any guess on the likelihood of the Magnitsky sanctions actually being imposed?

Good question, but the likelihood of Magnitsky sanctions on Hikvision is very difficult to predict. The President/Congress are under no obligation to act upon the CECC's suggestions. My (subjective) guess is that this unless we see a significant escalation in US-China tensions, or a substantial worsening of the (already very bad) Xinjiang situation, this option remains unlikely although still possible.

I think it's much more likely that Magnitsky sanctions are first imposed on Chen Quanguo, the PRC official in charge of Xinjiang, and his direct associates.

From various conversations I had last year, I think there was some moderate, if not significant, part of the day-to-day security industry population that felt Hikvision was going to avoid any long-term impacts from the sanctions and scrutiny. It seems there was an opinion that felt Hikvision was "too big to fail" in a way, and through lobbying/etc., would get through this, maybe weakened and chastised a bit, but more or less in tact.

The pressure not only seems to be not letting up on them, but is increasing, or at least maintaining strong momentum. By extension, I think we may start to see some increases in R&D spending and new product releases at other security industry companies that have clawed back some revenue and margin now that they do not need to compete so directly with Hikvision, et al.

Overall, I think that 2020 will be a potentially good year for any security industry product that is not built around Huawei components.

Anyone using the FAV button?

Honeywell/Resideo has/ had substantial sales into the PRC wonder what they are doing about this. Another spin off?

Validation such as being cited by a government report that addresses human suffering must be a very rewarding aspect of IPVM's effort. That's the kind of reward not even money, or Mastercard, can buy. Congratulations, John.

Most Recent Industry Reports

'Severe Impact' Mercury Security 2020 Leap Year Firmware Issue on Jan 17, 2020
One of the largest access controller manufacturers has a big problem: February 29th. Mercury Security, owned by HID, is alerting partners of the...
Apple Acquires, Loss For The Industry on Jan 16, 2020
Apple has acquired for $200 million, reports GeekWire. This is a loss for the video surveillance industry. stunned the industry...
Installation Course January 2020 - Last Chance on Jan 16, 2020
Thursday, January 16th is your last chance to register for the Winter 2020 Video Surveillance Installation Course. This is a unique installation...
Halo Smart Vape Detector Tested on Jan 16, 2020
The Halo Smart Sensor claims to detect vaping, including popular brand Juul and even THC vapes. But how well does it work in real world...
PRC Government Entity Now Controlling Shareholder of Infinova / March Networks on Jan 16, 2020
A PRC government entity is now the controlling shareholder of US security manufacturer Infinova as well as its wholly-owned subsidiary March...
Network Cabling for Video Surveillance on Jan 15, 2020
In this guide, we explain the fundamentals of network cabling for video surveillance networks, how they should be installed, and the differences in...
ONVIF [Un]Trashed Statement, Confirms Dahua and Hikvision Still Suspended on Jan 15, 2020
ONVIF has 'trashed' the suspension statement for Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, etc. but confirms to IPVM that those companies are all still...
Wyze Smart Door Lock Test on Jan 14, 2020
Wyze's inexpensive cameras have grabbed the attention of many in the consumer market, but can the company's new smart lock get similar...
Wesco Wins Anixter on Jan 13, 2020
Despite Anixter earlier arguing that Wesco's bid was inferior to CD&R's by nearly 10%, Anixter confirmed that they are taking Wesco's 3.1%...
Anixter Resisting Takeover From Competitor, Bidding War Emerges, Wesco Wins on Jan 13, 2020
Mega distributor Anixter is going to be acquired but by whom? Initially, Anixter planned to go private, being bought by a private equity firm....