Can Remote Video Monitoring be Crowdsourced?

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 06, 2009

Crowdsourcing - the process of outsourcing tasks to the general public using the Internet to distribute work - is a hot trend. However will it work and can it compete with traditional remote monitoring providers?

A new entrant is proposing this approach for remote video surveillance monitoring. The company, UK based InternetEyes, plans to have volunteers remotely monitor video surveillance cameras over the Internet. Key elements of the plan include:

  • Monitors will be motivated by monthly cash prizes for the person who catches the most criminals (currently planned for $1,600 USD).
  • When a monitor finds a suspicious activity, they flag it and that flag goes through their system to end users
  • To minimize privacy concerns, monitors will not be told the locations of the areas they are monitoring (though, of course, it is still possible that some monitors will recognize the locations)
  • To minimze inaccuracy or prejudiced alerts, monitors will be blocked if they submit more than 3 false alerts
  • Customers will be charged 20 GBP/$32 USD. This is presumably per camera though the online documentation I found is not clear on this point.

While this is not the first attempt to do remote monitoring of video surveillance using the public, this is far superior in design to the previous effort. Over the last few years, a group in Texas called BlueServo has run the Texas Border Watch - a set of cameras on the US/Mexico borders streamed over the Internet. In July 2009, it came under significant criticism for high costs and limited results.

Nonetheless, this service will obviously compete with the growing market of proprietary remote video providers from both traditional alarm monitoring companies and new entrants dedicated to video/video analytics.

The more specific and key question is then: Can crowdsourcing remote video monitoring compete with proprietary monitoring?

*************- *** ******* ** *********** ***** ** *** ******* ****** using *** ******** ** ********** **** - ** * *** trend. ******* **** ** **** *** *** ** ******* **** traditional ****** ********** *********?

* *** ******* ** ********* **** ******** *** ****** ***** surveillance **********. *** *******, ** *****************, ***** ** **** ********** ******** ******* ***** ************ ******* over *** ********. *** ******** ** *** **** *******:

  • ******** **** ** ********* ** ******* **** ****** *** *** person *** ******* *** **** ********* (********* ******* *** $*,*** USD).
  • **** * ******* ***** * ********** ********, **** **** ** and **** **** **** ******* ***** ****** ** *** *****
  • ** ******** ******* ********, ******** **** *** ** **** *** locations ** *** ***** **** *** ********** (******, ** ******, it ** ***** ******** **** **** ******** **** ********* *** locations)
  • ** ******* ********** ** ********** ******, ******** **** ** ******* if **** ****** **** **** * ***** ******
  • ********* **** ** ******* ** ***/$** ***. **** ** ********** per ****** ****** *** ****** ************* * ***** ** *** clear ** **** *****.

***** **** ** *** *** ***** ******* ** ** ****** monitoring ** ***** ************ ***** *** ******, **** ** *** superior ** ****** ** *** ******** ******. **** *** **** few *****, * ***** ** ***** ****** ********* *** *** the***** ****** *****- * *** ** ******* ** *** **/****** ******* ******** over *** ********. ** **** ****, ** **** ***** ******************** *** **** ***** *** ******* *******.

***********, **** ******* **** ********* ******* **** *** ******* ****** of *********** ****** ***** ********* **** **** *********** ***** ********** companies *** *** ******** ********* ** *****/***** *********.

*** **** ******** *** *** ******** ** ****: *** ************* remote ***** ********** ******* **** *********** **********?

[***************]

Advantages ** *************

************* *** ****. **** ** ****, ** ** ******* ** can ******* **** ** ********* *** **** ***** ****** ***** that *** ** ******* **** ***** ********.

*********, *** ****** ******* ****** ************ ** ********* * **** example ** *** ********** ** ******. *** **** ***** **** be ******* **** ******** ********, *********** ***** ****/*** ** ********** sections ** **** *******. *******, ** ********** ** ********* **, it ** ****** * **** ********** ** *** **** ******** in ***** ************.

* ****** ******* *************.***, ** ****** ******* **** ******* ******* ********** $** *** for * ****** ****** ** ** * *** ********* **** of ********. **** ** * *** ****, ***** *** *** companies ** ***** ** ********* ******** ***** **** ***** *******.

* *** ********** *** ** ********* **** *** ******* ** this *******:

  • Professionals **** **** ****: Getting true "UI" experts easily costs 10-100 times as much. While this is nowhere near the same quality level as an expert, hearing from an "average user" could still find the most significant issues.
  • Easy ** ******: The reviewer can easily and instantly access the website to review. There' no need for special access or physically mailing information, etc.
  • Privacy *** * *******: The client will likely not be concerned about the reviewer disclosing the website or the information on it. Generally, there's not much secret or private information on commercial sites.
  • Infrequent ******* ******: This only needs to be done once in a while. Having a few people do a review (for about $100) may be good enough for a year or two. If companies needed to do this continuously, they would be more attracted to screening and hiring specific contactors.
  • Cannot ** *********: There's no easy way to automate usability for a computer to perform. As such, this service cannot be easily replaced by technology.
********* ***** ********** ************* *** ****.

Key ******** ** ****** ***** **********

***** **** **********, ** *** *** *** ****** ***** ********** will **** ********** **** **** ** ***** *:
  • Labor **** ***** ****: The only crowdsourcing advantage that remote monitoring clearly meets, it is likely that crowdsourcing remote monitors can be significantly less than on-site guards. This could be accomplished by paying people from lower income countries or those that are retired or disabled.
  • Very ********* ** ******: Accessing video surveillance feeds will be extremely difficult. Those customers using remote video monitoring today frequently set up a VPN with a trusted, bonded service provider. This is technically complex and does not scale to support widespread Internet distribution. Unlike telling someone to go to a website, remotely accessing a company's surveillance video is almost impossible without technical changes.
  • Privacy ** * ******* *** **** *** ***** *********: Even if a clever scheme can be devised to hide or randomize which monitors see what video, lots of security managers will remain concerned. If the crowdsourced remote video monitoring implements background checks and sophisticated tracking of who is monitoring, they may be able to allay this somewhat.
  • Continuous ******* ******: Most security managers will want such service on an ongoing basis. As an ongoing service, this will increase value of proprietary service.
  • Video ********* **** ****** **********: The premise of crowdsourcing video surveillance depends on reducing high manual labor costs. However, as video analytics mature, its use will grow and that will significantly reduce the need for labor. A response infrastructure will still be needed, including reviewing false alerts, etc. However, that can be done for a large number of customers with a small in-house staff that ensures privacy. Even an error prone video analytic based system is likely to be far preferable to having crowds of people watch continuous video.
** ***** * **********, *** ********* ******* ** *********** ***** sourcing *** ****** ** ** (*) *** ********** ** ********* video *** (*) ***** ********* ********* ***** *********.

***** **** ** **** ***** *********** ***** *********, ** ** unlikely ** ** ************ *********** **** *********** ****** ***** ********** services ***** *********.
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Axis Partner Elder Care Video Analytics (Smartervision) on Dec 07, 2016
Can video analytics be used to improve the care of the elderly? Axis and a video analytics startup, Smartervision, are working together to do so....
Top Surprises in the Video Surveillance Industry 2016 on Nov 29, 2016
  The top 3 surprises of 2016 for integrators surveyed by IPVM were: The race to bottom, repeating 2015's Top Surprise Result New -...
Hikvision's ImageNet Win Analyzed on Nov 28, 2016
Hikvision is pushing hard to move up market and win at video analytics. One notable sign is Hikvision touting their #1 ranking for an ImageNet...
China Hot For Intelligent Video on Oct 27, 2016
The clear top theme at the 2016 Security China show has been intelligent video. This is a big shift from past years, and China's historical focus...
Hikvision Partners With Intel Movidius For Artificial intelligence Cameras on Oct 25, 2016
The world's largest camera manufacturer is partnering with the worlds largest semiconductor company to create a series of intelligent...
No Marketing Gimmick, Sharp Security Robot Targets Professional Market on Oct 17, 2016
Security robots are getting a lot of attention. Unfortunately, this is often for wrong reasons, most spectacularly highlighted by the Knightscope...
Camio Natural Language Processing Tested on Sep 27, 2016
The ex-Googler led team from Camio has advanced its video monitoring offering to include natural language processing. Camio ingests video,...
Nest Cam Outdoor Tested - Analytics Strong, Installation Weak on Sep 23, 2016
After years of claiming an outdoor model was "coming", addressing their biggest user demand, Nest has finally released their Outdoor Camera, an...
History of Video Surveillance on Sep 22, 2016
This is a concise history of video surveillance covering the past decade.  The goal is to help professionals newer to the industry understand...
Pelco Optera 270° Camera Tested on Sep 06, 2016
Multi-imager cameras are typically 180° or 360°. Pelco has released a fixed 270° versions of their Optera intended to cover exterior building...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The Russian SMP Security Robot on Dec 08, 2016
A Russian manufacturer, SMP, has a commercially available outdoor security robot, at a lower price and with much less marketing than their main...
How Hikvision Beats Its OEMs on Dec 08, 2016
Hikvision GM declared that they are not aggressive with their competitors. But some of their own OEM partners disagree. Inside, we reveal a key...
Dahua Discontinuing H.264 Only Products on Dec 08, 2016
Dahua has taken a stand for H.265 and is discontinuing its H.264 only products. We examine the shakeup inside this...
Last Day Save $50 IP Networking Course January 2017 on Dec 08, 2016
Today is the last day to save $50 on next month's IP networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
Hikvision vs Dahua Mobile Apps Tested on Dec 07, 2016
With smartphone use and low-cost video recorders surging, many user's main interface to their surveillance system is their phone. With mobile video...
Paxton Drops US Reps, Plans Major Expansion on Dec 07, 2016
Paxton is gearing up to make a big run at  US access control success. The first step they have made is to cut all US Rep Firms, in anticipation of...
Axis Partner Elder Care Video Analytics (Smartervision) on Dec 07, 2016
Can video analytics be used to improve the care of the elderly? Axis and a video analytics startup, Smartervision, are working together to do so....
Sony IP Camera Backdoor Uncovered on Dec 06, 2016
A backdoor has been uncovered in ~80 Sony IP camera models, attackers can remotely enable telnet on the camera, and then potentially login as root,...
Power Drill Selection Guide on Dec 06, 2016
Boring holes is a basic part of running cables for most security system projects. To do so, you will need to choose the right drills for various...
Milestone Favorability Results on Dec 06, 2016
In our second installment of manufacturer favorability results (first was Pelco), we turn to Milestone. 100+ integrators rated and explained what...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact