Can Remote Video Monitoring be Crowdsourced?

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 06, 2009

Crowdsourcing - the process of outsourcing tasks to the general public using the Internet to distribute work - is a hot trend. However will it work and can it compete with traditional remote monitoring providers?

A new entrant is proposing this approach for remote video surveillance monitoring. The company, UK based InternetEyes, plans to have volunteers remotely monitor video surveillance cameras over the Internet. Key elements of the plan include:

  • Monitors will be motivated by monthly cash prizes for the person who catches the most criminals (currently planned for $1,600 USD).
  • When a monitor finds a suspicious activity, they flag it and that flag goes through their system to end users
  • To minimize privacy concerns, monitors will not be told the locations of the areas they are monitoring (though, of course, it is still possible that some monitors will recognize the locations)
  • To minimze inaccuracy or prejudiced alerts, monitors will be blocked if they submit more than 3 false alerts
  • Customers will be charged 20 GBP/$32 USD. This is presumably per camera though the online documentation I found is not clear on this point.

While this is not the first attempt to do remote monitoring of video surveillance using the public, this is far superior in design to the previous effort. Over the last few years, a group in Texas called BlueServo has run the Texas Border Watch - a set of cameras on the US/Mexico borders streamed over the Internet. In July 2009, it came under significant criticism for high costs and limited results.

Nonetheless, this service will obviously compete with the growing market of proprietary remote video providers from both traditional alarm monitoring companies and new entrants dedicated to video/video analytics.

The more specific and key question is then: Can crowdsourcing remote video monitoring compete with proprietary monitoring?

*************- *** ******* ** *********** ***** ** *** ******* ****** using *** ******** ** ********** **** - ** * *** trend. ******* **** ** **** *** *** ** ******* **** traditional ****** ********** *********?

* *** ******* ** ********* **** ******** *** ****** ***** surveillance **********. *** *******, ** ***** ************, ***** ** **** ********** ******** ******* ***** ************ ******* **** *** Internet. *** ******** ** *** **** *******:

  • ******** **** ** ********* ** ******* **** ****** *** *** person *** ******* *** **** ********* (********* ******* *** $*,*** USD).
  • **** * ******* ***** * ********** ********, **** **** ** and **** **** **** ******* ***** ****** ** *** *****
  • ** ******** ******* ********, ******** **** *** ** **** *** locations ** *** ***** **** *** ********** (******, ** ******, it ** ***** ******** **** **** ******** **** ********* *** locations)
  • ** ******* ********** ** ********** ******, ******** **** ** ******* if **** ****** **** **** * ***** ******
  • ********* **** ** ******* ** ***/$** ***. **** ** ********** per ****** ****** *** ****** ************* * ***** ** *** clear ** **** *****.

***** **** ** *** *** ***** ******* ** ** ****** monitoring ** ***** ************ ***** *** ******, **** ** *** superior ** ****** ** *** ******** ******. **** *** **** few *****, * ***** ** ***** ****** ********* *** *** the***** ****** ***** - * *** ** ******* ** *** **/****** ******* ******** over *** ********. ** **** ****, ** **** ***** ******************** *** **** ***** *** ******* *******.

***********, **** ******* **** ********* ******* **** *** ******* ****** of *********** ****** ***** ********* **** **** *********** ***** ********** companies *** *** ******** ********* ** *****/***** *********.

*** **** ******** *** *** ******** ** ****: *** ************* remote ***** ********** ******* **** *********** **********?

[***************]

Advantages ** *************

************* *** ****. **** ** ****, ** ** ******* ** can ******* **** ** ********* *** **** ***** ****** ***** that *** ** ******* **** ***** ********.

*********, *** ****** ******* ****** ************ ** ********* * **** example ** *** ********** ** ******. *** **** ***** **** be ******* **** ******** ********, *********** ***** ****/*** ** ********** sections ** **** *******. *******, ** ********** ** ********* **, it ** ****** * **** ********** ** *** **** ******** ** ***** surveillance.

* ****** ******* *************.***, ** ****** ******* **** ******* ******* ********** $** *** for * ****** ****** ** ** * *** ********* **** of ********. **** ** * *** ****, ***** *** *** companies ** ***** ** ********* ******** ***** **** ***** *******.

* *** ********** *** ** ********* **** *** ******* ** this *******:

  • Professionals **** **** ****: Getting true "UI" experts easily costs 10-100 times as much. While this is nowhere near the same quality level as an expert, hearing from an "average user" could still find the most significant issues.
  • Easy ** ******: The reviewer can easily and instantly access the website to review. There' no need for special access or physically mailing information, etc.
  • Privacy *** * *******: The client will likely not be concerned about the reviewer disclosing the website or the information on it. Generally, there's not much secret or private information on commercial sites.
  • Infrequent ******* ******: This only needs to be done once in a while. Having a few people do a review (for about $100) may be good enough for a year or two. If companies needed to do this continuously, they would be more attracted to screening and hiring specific contactors.
  • Cannot ** *********: There's no easy way to automate usability for a computer to perform. As such, this service cannot be easily replaced by technology.
********* ***** ********** ************* *** ****.

Key ******** ** ****** ***** **********

***** **** **********, ** *** *** *** ****** ***** ********** will **** ********** **** **** ** ***** *:
  • Labor **** ***** ****: The only crowdsourcing advantage that remote monitoring clearly meets, it is likely that crowdsourcing remote monitors can be significantly less than on-site guards. This could be accomplished by paying people from lower income countries or those that are retired or disabled.
  • Very ********* ** ******: Accessing video surveillance feeds will be extremely difficult. Those customers using remote video monitoring today frequently set up a VPN with a trusted, bonded service provider. This is technically complex and does not scale to support widespread Internet distribution. Unlike telling someone to go to a website, remotely accessing a company's surveillance video is almost impossible without technical changes.
  • Privacy ** * ******* *** **** *** ***** *********: Even if a clever scheme can be devised to hide or randomize which monitors see what video, lots of security managers will remain concerned. If the crowdsourced remote video monitoring implements background checks and sophisticated tracking of who is monitoring, they may be able to allay this somewhat.
  • Continuous ******* ******: Most security managers will want such service on an ongoing basis. As an ongoing service, this will increase value of proprietary service.
  • Video ********* **** ****** **********: The premise of crowdsourcing video surveillance depends on reducing high manual labor costs. However, as video analytics mature, its use will grow and that will significantly reduce the need for labor. A response infrastructure will still be needed, including reviewing false alerts, etc. However, that can be done for a large number of customers with a small in-house staff that ensures privacy. Even an error prone video analytic based system is likely to be far preferable to having crowds of people watch continuous video.
** ***** * **********, *** ********* ******* ** *********** ***** sourcing *** ****** ** ** (*) *** ********** ** ********* video *** (*) ***** ********* ********* ***** *********.

***** **** ** **** ***** *********** ***** *********, ** ** unlikely ** ** ************ *********** **** *********** ****** ***** ********** services ***** *********.
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Simplisafe Warns Customers About Alarm Fines on Mar 17, 2017
Simplisafe markets themselves as a 'better way' than traditional professional alarm companies. However, in one key way, Simplisafe hides the...
Alarm Panic Switches Tutorial on Mar 16, 2017
Panic switches allow silently triggering an alarm system when it is otherwise disarmed. In this tutorial we explain and contrast the 7 most common...
Environmental Sensors For Burglar Alarm Tutorials on Mar 15, 2017
Intrusion detection systems can be used to alert users to environmental issues. By connecting sensors that monitor the heat, humidity, and...
ObjectVideo Acquired by Alarm.com on Mar 14, 2017
Once potentially the most recognized name in video analytics, ObjectVideo has effectively been sold for pieces. Alarm.com has now acquired what...
DMP Intrusion Tested (XR Series) on Mar 09, 2017
DMP is a major provider of intrusion systems, but lacks the global brand recognition of some of its rivals (such as Bosch, Honeywell, DSC, or...
Hikvision People Counting Tested on Mar 09, 2017
People counting has historically been a difficult task, requiring specialized cameras, expensive software, and careful camera placement. But in the...
SimpliSafe Camera Tested on Mar 07, 2017
SimpliSafe ia one of the most controversial companies in the industry, as they have become the symbol of the DIY threat to traditional alarm...
Positive Video Surveillance Outlook - 2017 Statistics on Mar 07, 2017
376 manufacturers and integrators revealed their outlook on the future of the video surveillance industry in a recent IPVM survey. Both groups are...
Directory of DIY Alarm Systems on Mar 03, 2017
The fastest growing segment of the alarm market is Do It Yourself (DIY) systems. This directory covers DIY products for central station, push...
Simplisafe Has Lower False Alarm Rates Than Professional Systems on Mar 01, 2017
'Everybody' 'knows' that DIY alarm systems, like Simplisafe, generate more false alarms than traditional, professionally installed ones. But it is...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Everbridge Mass Notification Service Examined on Mar 24, 2017
Everbridge is expanding in the security space. In January 2017 Everbridge acquired PSIM platform IDV, and have also begun integrating with other...
Hikvision Removing Auto 'Phone Home' on Mar 24, 2017
Facing pressure over their cameras auto phoning home and their Chinese government ownership, Hikvision has begun quietly removing automatic...
Axis Camera Vulnerabilities From Google Researcher Analyzed on Mar 23, 2017
A Google security researcher has reported 6 vulnerabilities for Axis cameras, affecting multiple models and firmware versions. In this report, we...
OpenEye Takes Aim At Exacq on Mar 23, 2017
First Milestone targeted Exacq with a takeover offer, and now OpenEye is gunning for them with an offer to swap out Exacq for their cloud-managed...
Lock Keyways For Access Control Guide on Mar 23, 2017
Lock keyways can be the difference between a lock working or not. Understanding keyways is important for access control. Indeed, a member recently...
Broken Browser Support for Video Surveillance on Mar 22, 2017
Modern web browsers have left the security industry behind. Current Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge browsers do not support NPAPI plugins,...
ADI Favorability Results on Mar 22, 2017
150 North American integrators provided feedback on 6 distributors, and why they do (or do not do) business with ADI. ADI is clearly a big name in...
1 Million Dahua Devices Exposed To Backdoor on Mar 22, 2017
Statistics show that 1 million Dahua devices are publicly exposed and vulnerable to the Dahua backdoor. Despite this, Dahua has downplayed the...
Hikvision Hires Crisis Communication Writer on Mar 21, 2017
Hikvision has hired a crisis communication writer as the company ramps up its efforts to deal with the 'crisis' it feels it is facing. 'Crisis...
Glass Break Sensor Tutorial on Mar 21, 2017
Burglars often break glass windows to get into a house. Using glass break detectors in conjunction with alarm contacts is a good way to protect the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact