Can Remote Video Monitoring be Crowdsourced?

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 06, 2009

Crowdsourcing - the process of outsourcing tasks to the general public using the Internet to distribute work - is a hot trend. However will it work and can it compete with traditional remote monitoring providers?

A new entrant is proposing this approach for remote video surveillance monitoring. The company, UK based InternetEyes, plans to have volunteers remotely monitor video surveillance cameras over the Internet. Key elements of the plan include:

  • Monitors will be motivated by monthly cash prizes for the person who catches the most criminals (currently planned for $1,600 USD).
  • When a monitor finds a suspicious activity, they flag it and that flag goes through their system to end users
  • To minimize privacy concerns, monitors will not be told the locations of the areas they are monitoring (though, of course, it is still possible that some monitors will recognize the locations)
  • To minimze inaccuracy or prejudiced alerts, monitors will be blocked if they submit more than 3 false alerts
  • Customers will be charged 20 GBP/$32 USD. This is presumably per camera though the online documentation I found is not clear on this point.

While this is not the first attempt to do remote monitoring of video surveillance using the public, this is far superior in design to the previous effort. Over the last few years, a group in Texas called BlueServo has run the Texas Border Watch - a set of cameras on the US/Mexico borders streamed over the Internet. In July 2009, it came under significant criticism for high costs and limited results.

Nonetheless, this service will obviously compete with the growing market of proprietary remote video providers from both traditional alarm monitoring companies and new entrants dedicated to video/video analytics.

The more specific and key question is then: Can crowdsourcing remote video monitoring compete with proprietary monitoring?

*************- *** ******* ** *********** ***** ** *** ******* ****** using *** ******** ** ********** **** - ** * *** trend. ******* **** ** **** *** *** ** ******* **** traditional ****** ********** *********?

* *** ******* ** ********* **** ******** *** ****** ***** surveillance **********. *** *******, ** ***** ************, ***** ** **** ********** ******** ******* ***** ************ ******* **** *** Internet. *** ******** ** *** **** *******:

  • ******** **** ** ********* ** ******* **** ****** *** *** person *** ******* *** **** ********* (********* ******* *** $*,*** USD).
  • **** * ******* ***** * ********** ********, **** **** ** and **** **** **** ******* ***** ****** ** *** *****
  • ** ******** ******* ********, ******** **** *** ** **** *** locations ** *** ***** **** *** ********** (******, ** ******, it ** ***** ******** **** **** ******** **** ********* *** locations)
  • ** ******* ********** ** ********** ******, ******** **** ** ******* if **** ****** **** **** * ***** ******
  • ********* **** ** ******* ** ***/$** ***. **** ** ********** per ****** ****** *** ****** ************* * ***** ** *** clear ** **** *****.

***** **** ** *** *** ***** ******* ** ** ****** monitoring ** ***** ************ ***** *** ******, **** ** *** superior ** ****** ** *** ******** ******. **** *** **** few *****, * ***** ** ***** ****** ********* *** *** the***** ****** ***** - * *** ** ******* ** *** **/****** ******* ******** over *** ********. ** **** ****, ** **** ***** ******************** *** **** ***** *** ******* *******.

***********, **** ******* **** ********* ******* **** *** ******* ****** of *********** ****** ***** ********* **** **** *********** ***** ********** companies *** *** ******** ********* ** *****/***** *********.

*** **** ******** *** *** ******** ** ****: *** ************* remote ***** ********** ******* **** *********** **********?

[***************]

Advantages ** *************

************* *** ****. **** ** ****, ** ** ******* ** can ******* **** ** ********* *** **** ***** ****** ***** that *** ** ******* **** ***** ********.

*********, *** ****** ******* ****** ************ ** ********* * **** example ** *** ********** ** ******. *** **** ***** **** be ******* **** ******** ********, *********** ***** ****/*** ** ********** sections ** **** *******. *******, ** ********** ** ********* **, it ** ****** * **** ********** ** *** **** ******** ** ***** surveillance.

* ****** ******* *************.***, ** ****** ******* **** ******* ******* ********** $** *** for * ****** ****** ** ** * *** ********* **** of ********. **** ** * *** ****, ***** *** *** companies ** ***** ** ********* ******** ***** **** ***** *******.

* *** ********** *** ** ********* **** *** ******* ** this *******:

  • Professionals **** **** ****: Getting true "UI" experts easily costs 10-100 times as much. While this is nowhere near the same quality level as an expert, hearing from an "average user" could still find the most significant issues.
  • Easy ** ******: The reviewer can easily and instantly access the website to review. There' no need for special access or physically mailing information, etc.
  • Privacy *** * *******: The client will likely not be concerned about the reviewer disclosing the website or the information on it. Generally, there's not much secret or private information on commercial sites.
  • Infrequent ******* ******: This only needs to be done once in a while. Having a few people do a review (for about $100) may be good enough for a year or two. If companies needed to do this continuously, they would be more attracted to screening and hiring specific contactors.
  • Cannot ** *********: There's no easy way to automate usability for a computer to perform. As such, this service cannot be easily replaced by technology.
********* ***** ********** ************* *** ****.

Key ******** ** ****** ***** **********

***** **** **********, ** *** *** *** ****** ***** ********** will **** ********** **** **** ** ***** *:
  • Labor **** ***** ****: The only crowdsourcing advantage that remote monitoring clearly meets, it is likely that crowdsourcing remote monitors can be significantly less than on-site guards. This could be accomplished by paying people from lower income countries or those that are retired or disabled.
  • Very ********* ** ******: Accessing video surveillance feeds will be extremely difficult. Those customers using remote video monitoring today frequently set up a VPN with a trusted, bonded service provider. This is technically complex and does not scale to support widespread Internet distribution. Unlike telling someone to go to a website, remotely accessing a company's surveillance video is almost impossible without technical changes.
  • Privacy ** * ******* *** **** *** ***** *********: Even if a clever scheme can be devised to hide or randomize which monitors see what video, lots of security managers will remain concerned. If the crowdsourced remote video monitoring implements background checks and sophisticated tracking of who is monitoring, they may be able to allay this somewhat.
  • Continuous ******* ******: Most security managers will want such service on an ongoing basis. As an ongoing service, this will increase value of proprietary service.
  • Video ********* **** ****** **********: The premise of crowdsourcing video surveillance depends on reducing high manual labor costs. However, as video analytics mature, its use will grow and that will significantly reduce the need for labor. A response infrastructure will still be needed, including reviewing false alerts, etc. However, that can be done for a large number of customers with a small in-house staff that ensures privacy. Even an error prone video analytic based system is likely to be far preferable to having crowds of people watch continuous video.
** ***** * **********, *** ********* ******* ** *********** ***** sourcing *** ****** ** ** (*) *** ********** ** ********* video *** (*) ***** ********* ********* ***** *********.

***** **** ** **** ***** *********** ***** *********, ** ** unlikely ** ** ************ *********** **** *********** ****** ***** ********** services ***** *********.
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Remote Video Monitoring Providers Directory on May 22, 2017
Remote video monitoring can help integrators generate RMR plus end users lower their security costs and/or improve response to critical...
Shark Tank Startup Guard Llama Mobile Panic Tested on May 16, 2017
A Shark Tank TV show appearance has attracted big attention for Guard Llama, a security startup touting a 'panic button' paired with mobile app...
Burglar Alarm Partitions Guide on May 10, 2017
Many burglar alarm systems have a single designated level of access for users. A user can arm or disarm the entire alarm by entering a single code....
Arming States For Burglar Alarms on May 04, 2017
Burglar alarms give the user the ability to choose how much of their alarm is active at any time. Activating alarm sensors on windows and...
Duress Codes For Alarms Systems on May 02, 2017
An alarm system can call for help in the event of an attempted break in, but only if it is armed. If an adversary forces an authorized user to...
Burglar Alarm Zoning Guide on Apr 28, 2017
The function of an alarm panel is to gather information from sensors and respond to this information by triggering actions. While it is possible to...
PureTech Video Analytics Examined on Apr 21, 2017
PureTech's analytics were chosen for a US border protection system (see related post), which the company claims no other analytics vendor was able...
US Border RVSS / Video Analytics System Examined on Apr 21, 2017
US Customs and Border Protection has been rolling out a video analytics-based detection system along the US/Mexico border, with detection ranges...
Bosch B-Series Intrusion Tested on Apr 10, 2017
Bosch is one of the biggest names in intrusion but their B-Series panels, targeted at smaller site installs and available through distribution, are...
Best and Worst - ISC West 2017 Show Report on Apr 10, 2017
IPVM went to Las Vegas, examining what vendors are showcasing and what is new. Attendance was up, according to the show, and was certainly well...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Anti-Hack Access Card Shields Tested on May 26, 2017
Keeping your access control card information secure is becoming a big priority, especially since cheaper copiers can hack details easily. Multiple...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial 2017 on May 25, 2017
Since 2013, video surveillance professionals have talked about the potential for H.265. Now, in 2017, H.265 is starting to gain mainstream...
Camera Course Summer 2017 on May 25, 2017
Learn video surveillance and get certified. IPVM provides live online classes, recorded videos, personal help, cutting edge education and...
Most Respected Manufacturer Competitors on May 25, 2017
Manufacturers told IPVM what competitor they most respected. In terms of total revenue, Hikvision, Dahua and Axis are certainly tops but would...
CyPhy 'Unlimited' Flight Time Security Drone Examined on May 25, 2017
Drones face several issues as commercial security platforms - legal restrictions (e.g., in the US, the FAA), costs, and limited flight durations...
Milestone Entry Level Mobile Password Vulnerability Disclosed on May 24, 2017
While many manufacturers have only addressed cybersecurity vulnerabilities after public disclosures were made (or threatened), Milestone has...
How Integrators Use IPVM on May 24, 2017
150 integrators explained how they use IPVM and how it helps them stay informed and improve their business.  The 4 main uses integrators cited for...
Alarm Supervision Guide on May 24, 2017
Burglar alarms can constantly monitor the health of attached circuits, sensors, and devices to ensure that they remain operational. This is known...
Arlo Go Cellular Cloud Camera Tested on May 23, 2017
Totally wireless surveillance cameras are growing but almost all typically depend on a hub and local Internet access. However, many outdoor...
Avigilon New COO James Henderson Profile on May 23, 2017
It has been nearly 2 years since the infamous Bryan Schmode 'resigned' as Avigilon COO. Now, Avigilon once again has a COO, promoting James...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact