Can Remote Video Monitoring be Crowdsourced?

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 06, 2009

Crowdsourcing - the process of outsourcing tasks to the general public using the Internet to distribute work - is a hot trend. However will it work and can it compete with traditional remote monitoring providers?

A new entrant is proposing this approach for remote video surveillance monitoring. The company, UK based InternetEyes, plans to have volunteers remotely monitor video surveillance cameras over the Internet. Key elements of the plan include:

  • Monitors will be motivated by monthly cash prizes for the person who catches the most criminals (currently planned for $1,600 USD).
  • When a monitor finds a suspicious activity, they flag it and that flag goes through their system to end users
  • To minimize privacy concerns, monitors will not be told the locations of the areas they are monitoring (though, of course, it is still possible that some monitors will recognize the locations)
  • To minimze inaccuracy or prejudiced alerts, monitors will be blocked if they submit more than 3 false alerts
  • Customers will be charged 20 GBP/$32 USD. This is presumably per camera though the online documentation I found is not clear on this point.

While this is not the first attempt to do remote monitoring of video surveillance using the public, this is far superior in design to the previous effort. Over the last few years, a group in Texas called BlueServo has run the Texas Border Watch - a set of cameras on the US/Mexico borders streamed over the Internet. In July 2009, it came under significant criticism for high costs and limited results.

Nonetheless, this service will obviously compete with the growing market of proprietary remote video providers from both traditional alarm monitoring companies and new entrants dedicated to video/video analytics.

The more specific and key question is then: Can crowdsourcing remote video monitoring compete with proprietary monitoring?

*************- *** ******* ** *********** ***** ** *** ******* ****** using *** ******** ** ********** **** - ** * *** trend. ******* **** ** **** *** *** ** ******* **** traditional ****** ********** *********?

* *** ******* ** ********* **** ******** *** ****** ***** surveillance **********. *** *******, ** ***** ************, ***** ** **** ********** ******** ******* ***** ************ ******* **** *** Internet. *** ******** ** *** **** *******:

  • ******** **** ** ********* ** ******* **** ****** *** *** person *** ******* *** **** ********* (********* ******* *** $*,*** USD).
  • **** * ******* ***** * ********** ********, **** **** ** and **** **** **** ******* ***** ****** ** *** *****
  • ** ******** ******* ********, ******** **** *** ** **** *** locations ** *** ***** **** *** ********** (******, ** ******, it ** ***** ******** **** **** ******** **** ********* *** locations)
  • ** ******* ********** ** ********** ******, ******** **** ** ******* if **** ****** **** **** * ***** ******
  • ********* **** ** ******* ** ***/$** ***. **** ** ********** per ****** ****** *** ****** ************* * ***** ** *** clear ** **** *****.

***** **** ** *** *** ***** ******* ** ** ****** monitoring ** ***** ************ ***** *** ******, **** ** *** superior ** ****** ** *** ******** ******. **** *** **** few *****, * ***** ** ***** ****** ********* *** *** the***** ****** ***** - * *** ** ******* ** *** **/****** ******* ******** over *** ********. ** **** ****, ** **** ***** ******************** *** **** ***** *** ******* *******.

***********, **** ******* **** ********* ******* **** *** ******* ****** of *********** ****** ***** ********* **** **** *********** ***** ********** companies *** *** ******** ********* ** *****/***** *********.

*** **** ******** *** *** ******** ** ****: *** ************* remote ***** ********** ******* **** *********** **********?

[***************]

Advantages ** *************

************* *** ****. **** ** ****, ** ** ******* ** can ******* **** ** ********* *** **** ***** ****** ***** that *** ** ******* **** ***** ********.

*********, *** ****** ******* ****** ************ ** ********* * **** example ** *** ********** ** ******. *** **** ***** **** be ******* **** ******** ********, *********** ***** ****/*** ** ********** sections ** **** *******. *******, ** ********** ** ********* **, it ** ****** * **** ********** ** *** **** ******** ** ***** surveillance.

* ****** ******* *************.***, ** ****** ******* **** ******* ******* ********** $** *** for * ****** ****** ** ** * *** ********* **** of ********. **** ** * *** ****, ***** *** *** companies ** ***** ** ********* ******** ***** **** ***** *******.

* *** ********** *** ** ********* **** *** ******* ** this *******:

  • Professionals **** **** ****: Getting true "UI" experts easily costs 10-100 times as much. While this is nowhere near the same quality level as an expert, hearing from an "average user" could still find the most significant issues.
  • Easy ** ******: The reviewer can easily and instantly access the website to review. There' no need for special access or physically mailing information, etc.
  • Privacy *** * *******: The client will likely not be concerned about the reviewer disclosing the website or the information on it. Generally, there's not much secret or private information on commercial sites.
  • Infrequent ******* ******: This only needs to be done once in a while. Having a few people do a review (for about $100) may be good enough for a year or two. If companies needed to do this continuously, they would be more attracted to screening and hiring specific contactors.
  • Cannot ** *********: There's no easy way to automate usability for a computer to perform. As such, this service cannot be easily replaced by technology.
********* ***** ********** ************* *** ****.

Key ******** ** ****** ***** **********

***** **** **********, ** *** *** *** ****** ***** ********** will **** ********** **** **** ** ***** *:
  • Labor **** ***** ****: The only crowdsourcing advantage that remote monitoring clearly meets, it is likely that crowdsourcing remote monitors can be significantly less than on-site guards. This could be accomplished by paying people from lower income countries or those that are retired or disabled.
  • Very ********* ** ******: Accessing video surveillance feeds will be extremely difficult. Those customers using remote video monitoring today frequently set up a VPN with a trusted, bonded service provider. This is technically complex and does not scale to support widespread Internet distribution. Unlike telling someone to go to a website, remotely accessing a company's surveillance video is almost impossible without technical changes.
  • Privacy ** * ******* *** **** *** ***** *********: Even if a clever scheme can be devised to hide or randomize which monitors see what video, lots of security managers will remain concerned. If the crowdsourced remote video monitoring implements background checks and sophisticated tracking of who is monitoring, they may be able to allay this somewhat.
  • Continuous ******* ******: Most security managers will want such service on an ongoing basis. As an ongoing service, this will increase value of proprietary service.
  • Video ********* **** ****** **********: The premise of crowdsourcing video surveillance depends on reducing high manual labor costs. However, as video analytics mature, its use will grow and that will significantly reduce the need for labor. A response infrastructure will still be needed, including reviewing false alerts, etc. However, that can be done for a large number of customers with a small in-house staff that ensures privacy. Even an error prone video analytic based system is likely to be far preferable to having crowds of people watch continuous video.
** ***** * **********, *** ********* ******* ** *********** ***** sourcing *** ****** ** ** (*) *** ********** ** ********* video *** (*) ***** ********* ********* ***** *********.

***** **** ** **** ***** *********** ***** *********, ** ** unlikely ** ** ************ *********** **** *********** ****** ***** ********** services ***** *********.
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

2018 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Dec 11, 2017
This report concisely explains the developments for surveillance cameras offered in 2017 and the state of offerings going into 2018, including...
Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference Review on Dec 08, 2017
Investment bank Imperial Capital holds an annual Security Investor Conference where 60+ companies present, including this year: IPVM bought a...
'Catastrophic Problem' For Videofied App on Dec 06, 2017
Less than 2 months after closing their DIY division DragonFly, Videofied has been hit with a problem the company calls 'catastrophic'. Now the...
Favorite Surveillance Monitors Statistics on Nov 29, 2017
What monitors are most commonly used for video surveillance? Are they more typically consumer or professional? Are there specific brands that...
Nest Secure Alarm System Tested on Nov 16, 2017
Google's expansion continues, this time into home security with their Nest subsidiary's move into alarm systems. They paid more than a...
Milestone XProtect Essential+ Free VMS Tested on Nov 09, 2017
Milestone continues to expand its aggressive free and low-cost offerings, with this year, Milestone releasing XProtect Essential+, part of their...
Top 2017 Trends - Cyber and Analytics on Nov 09, 2017
The 2 clear top 2017 trends, according to IPVM integrator statistics are: Cyber Security Video Analytics This is a change from 2016...
Honeywell Indiegogo-Funded DIY Intrusion System Examined on Nov 02, 2017
Honeywell did $39 Billion dollars in revenue last year, but they are asking the public for $50,000 (.0001% of revenue) to fund their Indiegogo...
Search More Important Than Live Monitoring - Statistics on Oct 18, 2017
Search is overall more important than live monitoring to integrators, according to new IPVM statistics.  The key themes found in integrator...
Deep Learning Tutorial For Video Surveillance on Oct 17, 2017
Deep learning is a growing buzzword within physical security and video surveillance. But what is 'deep learning'? In this tutorial, we explain...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Robot Vandalism on Dec 11, 2017
Vandalism of security systems is a common concern. It is so common that camera vandalism statistics show that designers routinely sacrifice camera...
Access Controller Software Guide on Dec 11, 2017
Properly configuring access controllers software is key to a professional access system. These devices have fundamental settings that must be...
2018 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Dec 11, 2017
This report concisely explains the developments for surveillance cameras offered in 2017 and the state of offerings going into 2018, including...
Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference Review on Dec 08, 2017
Investment bank Imperial Capital holds an annual Security Investor Conference where 60+ companies present, including this year: IPVM bought a...
Integrator GPS Vehicle Tracking Statistics and Success Examined on Dec 08, 2017
GPS vehicle tracking is a growing but somewhat controversial topic. On the plus side, tracking may increases productivity by providing greater...
Hikvision NA Biggest Sale of 2017 on Dec 07, 2017
Hikvision North America has been relatively disciplined the past 5 months, reducing the number of sales and the breadth of what is on sale. No...
Security Integrator IT Expertise Statistics on Dec 07, 2017
20 years ago, putting physical security systems on IP networks was just emerging. Today, almost every system is networked in some way, IP cameras...
Lighthouse Deep Learning Camera Tested on Dec 07, 2017
A Silicon Valley startup, Lighthouse, with a Stanford PhD CTO, has released a deep learning AI camera with 3D sensors for just $300. The company...
Access Control Course Winter 2018 on Dec 07, 2017
Learn more below about the Winter 2018 IPVM Access Control Course. Register here. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in...
Broken Hikvision App Exposes Hypocrisy on Dec 06, 2017
While Hikvision talks about a commitment to cybersecurity, their broken app and their insecure 'solution' exposes not only their engineering...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact