Can Remote Video Monitoring be Crowdsourced?

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 06, 2009

Crowdsourcing - the process of outsourcing tasks to the general public using the Internet to distribute work - is a hot trend. However will it work and can it compete with traditional remote monitoring providers?

A new entrant is proposing this approach for remote video surveillance monitoring. The company, UK based InternetEyes, plans to have volunteers remotely monitor video surveillance cameras over the Internet. Key elements of the plan include:

  • Monitors will be motivated by monthly cash prizes for the person who catches the most criminals (currently planned for $1,600 USD).
  • When a monitor finds a suspicious activity, they flag it and that flag goes through their system to end users
  • To minimize privacy concerns, monitors will not be told the locations of the areas they are monitoring (though, of course, it is still possible that some monitors will recognize the locations)
  • To minimze inaccuracy or prejudiced alerts, monitors will be blocked if they submit more than 3 false alerts
  • Customers will be charged 20 GBP/$32 USD. This is presumably per camera though the online documentation I found is not clear on this point.

While this is not the first attempt to do remote monitoring of video surveillance using the public, this is far superior in design to the previous effort. Over the last few years, a group in Texas called BlueServo has run the Texas Border Watch - a set of cameras on the US/Mexico borders streamed over the Internet. In July 2009, it came under significant criticism for high costs and limited results.

Nonetheless, this service will obviously compete with the growing market of proprietary remote video providers from both traditional alarm monitoring companies and new entrants dedicated to video/video analytics.

The more specific and key question is then: Can crowdsourcing remote video monitoring compete with proprietary monitoring?

*************- *** ******* ** *********** ***** ** *** ******* ****** using *** ******** ** ********** **** - ** * *** trend. ******* **** ** **** *** *** ** ******* **** traditional ****** ********** *********?

* *** ******* ** ********* **** ******** *** ****** ***** surveillance **********. *** *******, ** ***** ************, ***** ** **** ********** ******** ******* ***** ************ ******* **** *** Internet. *** ******** ** *** **** *******:

  • ******** **** ** ********* ** ******* **** ****** *** *** person *** ******* *** **** ********* (********* ******* *** $*,*** USD).
  • **** * ******* ***** * ********** ********, **** **** ** and **** **** **** ******* ***** ****** ** *** *****
  • ** ******** ******* ********, ******** **** *** ** **** *** locations ** *** ***** **** *** ********** (******, ** ******, it ** ***** ******** **** **** ******** **** ********* *** locations)
  • ** ******* ********** ** ********** ******, ******** **** ** ******* if **** ****** **** **** * ***** ******
  • ********* **** ** ******* ** ***/$** ***. **** ** ********** per ****** ****** *** ****** ************* * ***** ** *** clear ** **** *****.

***** **** ** *** *** ***** ******* ** ** ****** monitoring ** ***** ************ ***** *** ******, **** ** *** superior ** ****** ** *** ******** ******. **** *** **** few *****, * ***** ** ***** ****** ********* *** *** the***** ****** ***** - * *** ** ******* ** *** **/****** ******* ******** over *** ********. ** **** ****, ** **** ***** ******************** *** **** ***** *** ******* *******.

***********, **** ******* **** ********* ******* **** *** ******* ****** of *********** ****** ***** ********* **** **** *********** ***** ********** companies *** *** ******** ********* ** *****/***** *********.

*** **** ******** *** *** ******** ** ****: *** ************* remote ***** ********** ******* **** *********** **********?

[***************]

Advantages ** *************

************* *** ****. **** ** ****, ** ** ******* ** can ******* **** ** ********* *** **** ***** ****** ***** that *** ** ******* **** ***** ********.

*********, *** ****** ******* ****** ************ ** ********* * **** example ** *** ********** ** ******. *** **** ***** **** be ******* **** ******** ********, *********** ***** ****/*** ** ********** sections ** **** *******. *******, ** ********** ** ********* **, it ** ****** * **** ********** ** *** **** ******** ** ***** surveillance.

* ****** ******* *************.***, ** ****** ******* **** ******* ******* ********** $** *** for * ****** ****** ** ** * *** ********* **** of ********. **** ** * *** ****, ***** *** *** companies ** ***** ** ********* ******** ***** **** ***** *******.

* *** ********** *** ** ********* **** *** ******* ** this *******:

  • Professionals **** **** ****: Getting true "UI" experts easily costs 10-100 times as much. While this is nowhere near the same quality level as an expert, hearing from an "average user" could still find the most significant issues.
  • Easy ** ******: The reviewer can easily and instantly access the website to review. There' no need for special access or physically mailing information, etc.
  • Privacy *** * *******: The client will likely not be concerned about the reviewer disclosing the website or the information on it. Generally, there's not much secret or private information on commercial sites.
  • Infrequent ******* ******: This only needs to be done once in a while. Having a few people do a review (for about $100) may be good enough for a year or two. If companies needed to do this continuously, they would be more attracted to screening and hiring specific contactors.
  • Cannot ** *********: There's no easy way to automate usability for a computer to perform. As such, this service cannot be easily replaced by technology.
********* ***** ********** ************* *** ****.

Key ******** ** ****** ***** **********

***** **** **********, ** *** *** *** ****** ***** ********** will **** ********** **** **** ** ***** *:
  • Labor **** ***** ****: The only crowdsourcing advantage that remote monitoring clearly meets, it is likely that crowdsourcing remote monitors can be significantly less than on-site guards. This could be accomplished by paying people from lower income countries or those that are retired or disabled.
  • Very ********* ** ******: Accessing video surveillance feeds will be extremely difficult. Those customers using remote video monitoring today frequently set up a VPN with a trusted, bonded service provider. This is technically complex and does not scale to support widespread Internet distribution. Unlike telling someone to go to a website, remotely accessing a company's surveillance video is almost impossible without technical changes.
  • Privacy ** * ******* *** **** *** ***** *********: Even if a clever scheme can be devised to hide or randomize which monitors see what video, lots of security managers will remain concerned. If the crowdsourced remote video monitoring implements background checks and sophisticated tracking of who is monitoring, they may be able to allay this somewhat.
  • Continuous ******* ******: Most security managers will want such service on an ongoing basis. As an ongoing service, this will increase value of proprietary service.
  • Video ********* **** ****** **********: The premise of crowdsourcing video surveillance depends on reducing high manual labor costs. However, as video analytics mature, its use will grow and that will significantly reduce the need for labor. A response infrastructure will still be needed, including reviewing false alerts, etc. However, that can be done for a large number of customers with a small in-house staff that ensures privacy. Even an error prone video analytic based system is likely to be far preferable to having crowds of people watch continuous video.
** ***** * **********, *** ********* ******* ** *********** ***** sourcing *** ****** ** ** (*) *** ********** ** ********* video *** (*) ***** ********* ********* ***** *********.

***** **** ** **** ***** *********** ***** *********, ** ** unlikely ** ** ************ *********** **** *********** ****** ***** ********** services ***** *********.
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Nest Secure Alarm System Tested on Nov 16, 2017
Google's expansion continues, this time into home security with their Nest subsidiary's move into alarm systems. They paid more than a...
Milestone XProtect Essential+ Free VMS Tested on Nov 09, 2017
Milestone continues to expand its aggressive free and low-cost offerings, with this year, Milestone releasing XProtect Essential+, part of their...
Top 2017 Trends - Cyber and Analytics on Nov 09, 2017
The 2 clear top 2017 trends, according to IPVM integrator statistics are: Cyber Security Video Analytics This is a change from 2016...
Honeywell Indiegogo-Funded DIY Intrusion System Examined on Nov 02, 2017
Honeywell did $39 Billion dollars in revenue last year, but they are asking the public for $50,000 (.0001% of revenue) to fund their Indiegogo...
Search More Important Than Live Monitoring - Statistics on Oct 18, 2017
Search is overall more important than live monitoring to integrators, according to new IPVM statistics.  The key themes found in integrator...
Deep Learning Tutorial For Video Surveillance on Oct 17, 2017
Deep learning is a growing buzzword within physical security and video surveillance. But what is 'deep learning'? In this tutorial, we explain...
Exacq M Series Low Cost NVR Tested on Oct 12, 2017
With recent cyber security issues hitting NVRs and cameras from low cost leaders Dahua and Hikvision, users are increasingly seeking alternatives...
Surveillance Systems Remote Access Usage Statistics on Oct 11, 2017
Remote access is a major benefit and risk for video surveillance. It is a benefit because it allows users to manage security or review...
Honeywell Discontinuing DragonFly on Oct 05, 2017
DIY is a big trend in the intrusion market and threat to incumbents. However, Honeywell is discontinuing their DragonFly DIY video-verified...
Startup Turing Video Segway-Based Security Robot Profile on Sep 13, 2017
If security robots can not replace guards, perhaps the next best thing is a robot the guard can actually ride.  Turing Video has raised $5...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Panasonic Unified Surveillance Strategy Analyzed on Nov 17, 2017
Panasonic is now a "Unified Surveillance" offering, as their ASIS 2017 booth proclaimed: Looking to make a comeback in the security industry,...
Amazon Cloud Cam Is Poor (Tested) on Nov 17, 2017
Retail behemoth Amazon has entered the surveillance market with the Amazon Cloud Cam, the eyes of its just-announced Amazon Key delivery...
Nest Secure Alarm System Tested on Nov 16, 2017
Google's expansion continues, this time into home security with their Nest subsidiary's move into alarm systems. They paid more than a...
Dahua Forbes 'Next Web Crisis' Vulnerability Dispute on Nov 16, 2017
The buffer overflow vulnerability in Dahua products is not in dispute, in fact we covered it when it was first published. What is in dispute is...
Isonas Cofounders Split, Launch Partner/Competitor on Nov 16, 2017
Breaking up is hard to do, especially when door access security is at stake. But that is exactly what has happened at Isonas. Senior employees...
Hikvision China Criticizes The WSJ on Nov 15, 2017
Hikvision, through the Chinese government's authoritative news service, has criticized the WSJ investigation into Hikvision. In this...
PoE UPS Tested (Energy Reconnect) on Nov 15, 2017
In security, backup power is important, but most often requires UPS systems or extra cabling to devices for low voltage power. Now, some have...
Axis Commits To Long-Term Firmware Support on Nov 15, 2017
With the rise of cyber security awareness, and a general increase in hardware reliability, "software warranties" may prove more valuable than...
Hikvision NVR 4.0 Improvements Tested on Nov 14, 2017
Hikvision has released firmware version 4.0 for select NVRs, touting two years of research and development, and claiming "the new generation GUI...
Vivotek Remote Stack Overflow Vulnerability on Nov 14, 2017
A stack overflow vulnerability in Vivotek cameras has been discovered by bashis, the security researcher who has also found vulnerabilities in...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact