Camera vs Server Side VMD 2012

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Apr 25, 2012

The question of whether to run motion detection at the camera or on the server is fundamental to IP surveillance systems, and occasionally hotly debated. This a complex topic without a clearcut "best". In order to clear some of this confusion, we asked respondents to our Spring 2012 integrator survey the following question, to find out what is being deployed in the field and why:

Responses were close to evenly split, with moderately more integrators preferring camera-side motion detection (57%) than server-side (43%). Much of this is due to the tradeoffs to both approaches, which we review below.

Benefits of Camera-Side Motion Detection

There are several potential benefits to using camera-side motion detection:

Reduction of Server Load

The most commonly-cited benefit of configuring motion detection on cameras is the reduction of server load. Since motion processing is moved to the edge, more processor is available for other functions. Depending on the VMS, this may allow more cameras to be run on a single server, or a smaller server to be used for the same number of cameras, reducing costs.

  • "There is unused processing power available on the camera end, and that increases the camera density on the server side. We can assign more cameras per server if we keep the motion detection on the camera."
  • "We pay a premium for these cameras because they have intelligence so why not use it. Also, when using the camera for motion detection the server requirements are really low. You can run a lot of cameras on a low powered PC when doing motion detection on the camera side."
  • "Reduced strain on VMS software and computer hardware. Camera motion detection in IP systems makes the VMS more reliable and reduces strain on the server."
  • "Instead of a large centralised server needing to work hard to process the motion of many cameras, they are done in the field. This adds to reliability and the removal of a single point of failure."

Bandwidth and Storage Reduction

Some cameras may be set up to send video frames only when motion is detected. This helps to reduce bandwidth and storage needs, as unnecessary data is not sent. This may cause issues, however, if motion detection zones and thresholds are not properly configured, as the camera may not trigger and send video during actual events. Some users prefer to use motion boost recording because of this, recording low frame rates or bitrate continuously, and increasing upon alarm. Note that motion boost recording is not strictly a camera-side function, but may be used with server-side motion detection, as well, dependent on the VMS.

  • "The camera can reduce the network traffic by streaming at a slower rate on no motion."
  • "When we use cameras that can handle motion alarms I prefer them for minimizing bandwidth use and server processor load when running H.264. Also since we use Milestone, the live disk don't have to work so hard."
  • "Much less load on the network"
  • "Whenever possible, I prefer the camera to send only those frames where motion has been detected. This tends to reduce overall network bandwidth requirements, still a hot commodity in certain circles."

Benefits of Server-Side Motion Detection

Consistency is the main advantage to server-side motion detection. Regardless of camera type or capabilities, when motion is performed by the VMS, all cameras are configured in the same way. Some VMSs allow motion settings to be copied from camera to camera, as well. Both of these serve to reduce installation time and complexity, since multiple user interfaces need not be learned and managed to set motion detection across multiple camera manufacturers.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

  • "It really depends on the bandwidth issues (if any) on the network. If bandwidth is not an issue i prefer server side VMD as it will be consistent across all of the cameras (if there happens to be more than one brand of camera in the system). It is also usually easier to set up as some generic settings can be copies across multiple channels.
  • "Server side for a consistent implementation."
  • "Easier to change on a mass scale. If using motion detection in the camera you have to change it per device which costs time and money."
  • "Server side VMD also get s equal treatment if you do updates. That is to say an update to the VMD in the server software will apply equally to all of the cameras on the system. If you do camera updates and there are different cameras in use you can end up with inconsistent results."
  • "It is easier to set up motion detection within the VMS as you can do it all form one location as opposed to having to remote into each camera individually to configure it."

Settings Retention

Proponents of both camera- and server-side motion detection may claim retention of settings as a benefit. When camera-side motion detection is used, settings are retained in the case of server failure, limiting the reconfiguration which must be performed. Conversely, should a camera fail, perhaps a more likely occurance, settings may be retained on the server when a new camera is installed.

  • Camera-side: "Camera always. you set it on all cameras, (most VMS's have the setting to set all at once, and fine tune each later), since if the server fries for some matter its just a matter of re-installing the VMS's and never need to recover settings on the cameras."
  • Server-side: "It alleviates having to reconfigure the motion detection settings if a camera is replaced."

While cameras fail far more frequently than servers, a server failure is more catastrophic than a camera failure since failing servers will wipe out settings from many cameras. As such, this is hard call that ultimately depends on personal preference.

Perceptions of Performance

VMSs and cameras support varying numbers and shapes of motion detection zones. Some will support motion boost recording only when motion detection is server-side, while others may allow this capability when using camera-side motion detection. For these reasons, VMS and camera selection will skew preferences for server- or camera-side detection.

For instance, proponents of both claim more flexibility in motion setup:

  • Camera-side: "With OnSSI the server motion detection is one window with one sensitivity. As we keep going up in Mega Pixels that we are installing one motion windows is not cutting it. We typically use three or four with different sensitivities on 3M cameras alone to minimize false trips."
  • Server-side: "I like running motion detection on the server side because it seems to have more options. Such as being able to do pre and post recording of segments and threshold of blocks off screen."

Taking these factors into account, users should be aware that motion detection performance is highly subjective. Due to the number of variables involved, users should test and understand the performance of the platforms they are deploying.

2 reports cite this report:

PTZ Camera Guide 2016 on Sep 15, 2016
Pan/Tilt/Zoom cameras remain critical parts of many surveillance systems, especially in large security operations. Because of this it is important...
Video Surveillance Commissioning / Install Checklist on Feb 08, 2016
This 60+ point checklist helps end users, integrators and consultants verify that video surveillance installation is complete. It covers the...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Why 3VR Failed on Feb 16, 2018
3VR destroyed transformed ~$65 million in VC funding into a $6.9 million exit. The reason they failed is simple. They bet on analytics. They...
Last Chance February 2018 Camera Course on Feb 15, 2018
This is the last chance to get into the Winter camera course, starts next Tuesday. Register now. IPVM provides the best education, live online...
Hanwha Wisenet X 5MP Camera Tested (XNV-8080R) on Feb 13, 2018
Wisenet X is Hanwha's high-end camera line. We tested their Wisenet X 1080p camera last year. Now Hanwha is offering 5MP cameras listing super low...
Favorite NVR / VMS Manufacturers 2018 on Feb 12, 2018
There is a new integrator favorite VMS. In 2016, 2 VMSes were effectively tied for top choice. One of those VMSes favorability was stable while...
Dahua 5MP Starlight Camera Tested (N52BM3Z) on Jan 30, 2018
Is 5MP the new 1080p? According to our recent statistics, average resolution continues to trend upwards. And now, manufacturers releasing new...
Shinobi: Moe Is Building His Own VMS on Jan 29, 2018
Building a new VMS may seem to be a thing of a bygone era. But one developer, Moinul "Moe" Alam, is doing just that and he has made his VMS,...
Worst NVR / VMS Manufacturers 2018 on Jan 29, 2018
These are the manufacturers who integrators reported the most significant problems with. 220+ integrators answered: In the past year, what...
Cold Weather Dome Test on Jan 25, 2018
Cameras frequently cite super low-temperature specs, with -30° or even -40° common. But to see how popular dome models actually handle real world...
Intel Meltdown / Spectre Patch Tested on Avigilon, Exacq and Milestone VMSes on Jan 23, 2018
Significant concern exists about the impact on VMS servers and video surveillance systems of patching the Meltdown and Spectre flaws. Generally,...
Hanwha Wave VMS Tested on Jan 22, 2018
Hanwha has released their first open platform VMS, Wisenet Wave, an Network Optix OEM (see test results) enhanced with integrations and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Why 3VR Failed on Feb 16, 2018
3VR destroyed transformed ~$65 million in VC funding into a $6.9 million exit. The reason they failed is simple. They bet on analytics. They...
"Fear Mongering": Hikvision USA Cybersecurity Director Dismisses Chinese Government Ownership Concerns on Feb 16, 2018
The facts are: The Chinese government created Hikvision and is Hikvision's controlling shareholder. Hikvision's Chairman, a Communist Party...
16:9 vs 4:3 Video Aspect Ratio Statistics on Feb 16, 2018
What aspect ratio do security integrators prefer? The 'standard' 4:3 or the 'wide' 16:9 one? 100+ integrators told us what they preferred, with...
Mercury Releases New Series 3 Redboard Access Panels on Feb 15, 2018
Mercury Security has their first major product release post-HID buyout, and things literally look different. The Series 3 SIO boards now are red...
Last Chance February 2018 Camera Course on Feb 15, 2018
This is the last chance to get into the Winter camera course, starts next Tuesday. Register now. IPVM provides the best education, live online...
Hikvision DeepInMind Tested Terribly on Feb 15, 2018
While Hikvision is heavily marketing deep learning and 'AI' as their next big thing, new IPVM test results of their DeepInMind NVR shows their deep...
Genetec CEO: You Cannot Buy Trust on Feb 14, 2018
Genetec's CEO, Pierre Racz, delivered a direct message at their channel partner conference: Racz has become a focal point in the industry debate...
Assa's Lowest Power Draw Maglock: Securitron M680E Examined on Feb 14, 2018
Securitron produces some of the most extreme maglocks on the market, including massively strong maglocks and even ones with integrated CCTV cams...
Hanwha Wisenet X 5MP Camera Tested (XNV-8080R) on Feb 13, 2018
Wisenet X is Hanwha's high-end camera line. We tested their Wisenet X 1080p camera last year. Now Hanwha is offering 5MP cameras listing super low...
Top Problems For Integrator Project Management on Feb 13, 2018
Security projects routinely encounter issues that jeopardize deadlines, create confusion, and shrink profits. Unfortunately, there are common...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact