Camera Test: PPF Needed For IDs, Text, Money

By: Derek Ward, Published on Feb 19, 2014

Need to see the fine print of a dollar bill, euro, driver's license or text on a document?

We tested 3 different types of print.

Currency, both the US dollar and the Euro:

Identification card, a US state driver's license

And text, with point size ranging from 8 to 40, like so:

The tests were done with an overhead shot (like for cash counting):

And an angled shot (like at a bank teller):

This test answers the questions of:

  • What resolution do I need?
  • How wide of a FoV can I cover?
  • What impact do angles have on capturing this?
  • How many PPF do I ned for text, money and IDs?
  • **** ** *** *** fine ***** ** * dollar ****, ****, ******'* license ** **** ** a ********?

    ** ****** * ********* types ** *****.

    ********, **** *** ** dollar *** *** ****:

    ************** ****, * ** state ******'* *******

    *** ****, **** ***** size ******* **** * to **, **** **:

    *** ***** **** **** with ** ******** **** (like *** **** ********):

    *** ** ****** **** (like ** * **** teller):

    **** **** ******* *** questions **:

    • **** ********** ** * need?
    • *** **** ** * FoV *** * *****?
    • **** ****** ** ****** have ** ********* ****?
    • *** **** *** ** I *** *** ****, money *** ***?

    [***************]

    ***************

    ***** ******* **** ****** of ******, ********, ***, or ***** ******* *** best ****** ** ******* the ******, ******* ** looking ******** **** **** above. ***** **** ** not ******** (*** ** obstructions ** ******** ***** pathways, ***.) ****** ****** be ** ******* ** possible ** ****** *********** issues. *******, *** ******* may ****** **** ***** handling ******, ********** ************ problems.

    *** ***** ***** ******** our *** *************** *** capturing ********, ***, *** other ******* ** **** test:

    Notable ********

    **** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

    • ******* ******* ******** ***** the ****** (**** ** cash *********) *** ****** in **** ***** ********** directly **** *** ******, overexposing *** *****.
    • ***** ** ****** **** of ~**° ******* *********** issues ***** ***** ********* similar ******* ** **** cases. **** *** ******'* license ** *** **** was **** ********* ** read **** *** ******* were ******, *** ** its ************. 
    • ****** **** ******* *** especially ********* ** ******* at *** ********** *** FOV, ***** **** ****** credit ***** *** ***** colors *** **** ******* and ********** ** ******* card ****** ***********. **** at ****+ ***, ******* are **** ********* *******.
    • *** ****** ** ****** for ******* ***** ** a ***** ** ******* are **** ****** **** expected ******** ** ******** elsewhere ** *** ****, since **** ******** ***** is ********* **** ***** objects. *** *******, ******** in *** **** *********** are ********* *********** ** ~160 *** ** ******, while ******* ****** ** read ***+.

    Overhead ***** ***********

    *** ***** *********** ******************** ***** **** *** cameras ******* ******** ***** the ******, ******* *** horizontal ***** ** **** at *', *', *** 9'. ** **** * look ** ******* **** sizes, * ************ ******* license, €* ****, *** $20 *** ****** ****.

    **** ***** ***** ** overview ** *** ***** at ***** ****:

    ******* **** *****

    ** ***** **** * 3' **** ***** ** view. ** **** ****, 720p *** **** **** to ******** ******* ** pt. **** *** *****, while ** **. *** legible ** *** ***** camera. * *** ** MP ******* **** **** to ******* ** *** 9 **. *****, ************.

    ******** *** *** ** 5', *** **** ****** is **** **** ** make *** *** ******* font, ** **, *** 1080p ** ****** **** to ******* ** **. At **** *** *** light *****, ***** ******** begins ** ****** ** issue *** *** * and ** ** *******, with **** ******* **** 20 **. ********** ** read *** ** ************ of *** ***** ****.

    *******, ** * *' HFOV, **** **** *** 1080p *** **** ** discern **** ** **. font, ***** *** * and ** ** ******* are ** ****** *** no **** ** ************.

    ******* *******

    ** * *' ****, 720p *** ***** *********** are ****** ** **** out *** ** *** text ******* ** *** driver's *******, *** **** detail ** *** *******'* photo. **** *** * and ** ********* ******* are **** ** **** address, ******* ******, *** some ******** ******* (****** out *****), *** ******* better ****** ** *** subject *****.

    ****** ** *' ***, none ** *** ************** ** **** **** on *** *******, **** overexposure ******** ** ***** due ** *** ***************** *** ******* *******.

    *******, ** *', ******* are ******** *******.

    ****

    ******* ** * €* note, ** *** *********** the ************ ** *** resolutions, *** ****** ****** (seen *** ******) ** not ******** ** ****.

     

    ** *' ***, *** €5 ************ ** ***** easy ** **** *** on *** *******.

    *******, ******** ** *', denomination ** ***** *******, though **** ********** ** the **** ******. *** 5 *** **** ******* become *********** ****, *** €5 ** ***** *******.

    $** ****** ****

    ******* * ** $** bill, *** ******* *** able ** ******* **** value *** ****** ****** at * *' ****.

    ****** ** *' ****, the **** *** ***** cameras ** ****** *** make *** *** ****** number *** ** ******* resolution. *** * *** 10MP ******* ******* ****** PPF *** **********, *** exposure ******** ***** ** arise.

    *******, ** * *' HFOV, *** ****** ****** is ******** ** *** cameras. *** **** ****** is ** *********** ** this ***** **** **** the $** **** ** difficult ** ****.

    45° ******* ***** ***** ***********

    ** ***** *** ******* back **** *** ***** and ****** **** ** about °45 ** *** **** effects **** *** ** text ********** *** ******** issues **** ** *** overhead *****. *****, ** **** a **** ** ******* font *****, * ************ driver's *******, €* ****, and $** *** ****** bill, **** ** **** FOV:

    **** *****

    ** *', ******* *** essentially *** **** ** the ******** ****, **** 720p *** ***** ********** 12 *** ** **. font, ************. *** *** camera ** **** ** read **** ** * pt., *** **** **** to ** **. 

    ******** *** *** ** 5', **** ** **. font ** ******* ** 720p, **** ** **. visible ** *** ***** camera. ************ ** *** 10MP ***** ** ******** reduced ****, **** ** pt. **** ********** ******* (previously ** **. *** the ******** *******).

    *******, ** * *' HFOV, ************ ** **** again * ******* *** the * *** ** MP *******, **** ***** smaller **** ** **. illegible.

    ******* *******

    *** ******'* ******* ******* more ********* ** **** when ************* ******. ** * 3' ****, **** * and ** ** **** difficulty ********** *** ******* letters ** **** **.

    ******** *** *** ** 5', ******* *** **** completely ****.

    *******, ******** *** *** to *', ** ******* are ***********, **** *** state ****** ******* ** even *** **** ******.

    ****

    ** * *' ****, the €* **** ** still ****** ******* ** all *******.

    ******** ****** *** ********** reduced ** *** ****, seen ** **** **********. All ******* *** ***** able ** **** *** the ************ ******* *****.

    *******, ***** *** **** was ********** ** *********** the ** ** ****** had ********** ********** *** €5 ****, ******* *** cameras ******* ****, ****** details ** *** **** fully *******.

    $** ****** ****

    ***** * *' ****, bill ************ *** ****** number ** ******* ** all ******* **** ** issues.

    ** * *' **** HFOV, *** ****** ****** is ********* ******* ** only *** ** ** camera, **** ****** ****** to **** ** ***. Bill ***** ** ******* visible ** *** *******.

    *******, ** *' ****, serial ****** ** ********** to *******. *******, ******** issues *** ******* *** to ****** *****, ****** the **** ************ ******* in *** *******.

Comments (13)

Fantastic test, this great information!

Thanks for this test guys. This is very helpful!

Jason, Chris, thanks for the feedback!

Everyone else, especially those who complain about IPVM being controversial, this has 80% less reads than our 'controversial' / business trends pieces. If you want more hard core tests, read them and show that you appreciate them.

I read'em all no matter how juicy or how dry...

Reason is: I ain't missin' no questions on the next pop quiz like I did on the last one...

Which imma guessin is any day now...

Sorry, I had edited this before I saw your reply. I had asked if my prior comment was available for display. There was a posting error that presented an incomplete report, which I had commented on. Beyond completeness issues, I had basically expressed appreciation of the effort and asked about the possibility of OCRing the text images.

After I loaded the 3ft_Font_Sizes.jpg text image into Acrobat to OCR, I read...

"Acrobat could not perform recognition (OCR) on this page because:

The resolution of this page is below the minimum 144 dpi.

OK"

I was surprised that the image carried sufficient metadata for Acrobat to have any sense of its true dimensions, and would not even attempt to OCR it.

For example, when I tried to OCR images of ships with 12' high letters across the stern, Acrobat at least attempted to OCR the images (without success).

It was deleted because your comment was on a non published, non complete report.

Thank you. Definitely a well rounded series of tests.

Clearly the 1080p is the overall winner here when it comes to VFM. The 10mp is not 5 times better than the 1080p or is the 5MP 2.5 times better than the 1080p.

What is interesting is the color reproduction between the two HD and the MP images.

Could you please confirm if the screen shots were all the same compression format i.e. MJPEG or H.264 and if it was done through the cameras native web interface or through a VMS.

Ryan, we always test with H.264, unless otherwise noticed, given that is the overwhelming codec of choice in the industry. I'll let Ethan answer the other questions.

Ethan, Could you please advise the method of capturing each image. Was it through a specific VMS or through the cameras native web browser. Were they the same 4 cameras for all of the tests. What was the image quality settings and H.264 profile used.

I appreciate this report as much as any of the others IPVM provides; without comparison tests like these, we'd be performing these tests on our Customers....not the best scenario.

Thanks for the information.

I thought this was a good test showing how the different "documents" were influenced by the overhead light at the two different angles utilized. Good food for thought if one is faced with trying to get a "best" of both worlds for overhead/casino type images of a variety of "documents" which may come across a counter or desk.

Two Questions Please, John:

If I missed it, I'm sorry, but do you have a recommendation on the range of PPF for reading license plates?

Do you know if the PPF numbers would vary with H.265?  I saw some chatter at IPVM on this topic last year, but it is more of a valid question now than it was in 2016.

Thank you!

Don,

Good questions.

License plate PPF requirements are similar to human face ones - 50ppf+ in general. You can see that / experiment with that in our Calculator example.

The big issues with license plate are (1) dealing with lighting (headlights + nighttime, etc.) and (2) dealing with speed (i.e., how fast is the car moving). This is why LPC generally requires integrated IR + fast shutter speeds, something we review in this license plate capture test. Regardless of your PPF, if lightning issues and speed are not properly handled, the license plate won't be properly captured.

Do you know if the PPF numbers would vary with H.265?

Nothing fundamentally makes H.265 better or worse than H.264 for capturing license plates. How much one compresses the image does, irregardless of the codec (e.g., see our Video Quality / Compression Tutorial).

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on PPF

Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
Uniview Pro 4K Camera Tested (IPC3238ER3-DVZ) on Aug 29, 2019
In our 8MP / 4K Fixed Lens Camera Shootout, Uniview's low end 8MP was firmly in the middle of the pack. Does their higher end Pro Series 4K camera...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
Verkada People And Face Analytics Tested on Aug 16, 2019
This week, Verkada released "People Analytics", including face analytics that they describe is a "game-changing feature" that "pushes the...
Axis 4K Camera Shootout 2019 on Aug 14, 2019
Axis' 4K Q3518-LVE claims the "best video quality possible", with Lightfinder super low light performance, Axis' high end Forensic WDR, and...
Dahua Analytics+ Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Dahua's analytics have performed poorly in past shootouts. But now, they claim their new Analytics+ "algorithms significantly improve accuracy and...
Bosch Starlight 8000i Cameras Tested on Jul 23, 2019
Bosch has released their new Flexidome IP Starlight 8000i cameras, claiming "exceptional detail even in extreme low-light situations." To see...

Most Recent Industry Reports

ONVIF Suspends Huawei on Sep 20, 2019
Huawei has been 'suspended', and effectively expelled, from ONVIF so long as US sanctions remain on the mega Chinese manufacturer. Inside this...
Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Uniview Prime Series 4K Camera Tested on Sep 18, 2019
Is the new Uniview 'Prime' better than the more expensive existing Uniview 'Pro'? In August, IPVM tested Uniview 4K 'Pro' but members advocated...
US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Manufacturers Unhappy With Weak ASIS GSX 2019 And 2020 Shift on Sep 16, 2019
Manufacturers were generally unhappy with ASIS GSX, both for weak 2019 booth traffic and a scheduling shift for the 2020 show, according to a new...