A routinely overlooked but key aspect to using video analytics is camera positioning. Not simply an implementation issue, camera positioning requirements can have a significant impact on the cost and design of video analytic systems. This is true whether you are analyzing license plates, people, faces or intruders.
[This is an excerpt from the premium Guide: "How to Select Video Analytics"]
In the Fine Print
In the user's manual of almost any video analytics systems are guidelines and requirements about how cameras need to be positioned. They almost always include points about avoiding direct exposure to sunlight and minimizing the angles of incident from the camera to the target. If you ignore these directions, performance can suffer dramatically.
Do This Before Buying
You need to factor this in during the design phase. If you wait until deployment, it can become a very significant problem. You may realize that you need to:
- Move an existing camera
- Add a new camera of the same type
- Add a new, more expensive, camera
At this point, the cost will go up, often dramatically. Worse, you may realize that logistical barriers exist (such as not being allowed to put cameras in places the video analytic system requires).
If you do this before the project, sometimes it will stop the project from being deployed. However, if you do this during the project and hit a problem, not only may the project fail but the end user can look bad and the integrator can lose a lot of money.
Why This is the Case
Handling a variety of lighting conditions or different angles can dramatically increase the computing resources needed to analyze video. Even if technically possible to perform such adjustments, it's often not feasible to implement them in commercial products because of the increased hardware cost this requires.
While cost of computing resources will certainly continue to fall and vendors will make improvements, these elements will continue to be an important constraint on video analytics for years to come.
Practical Examples of This
While different types of video analytics have specific requirements, you can certainly see the same general pattern of requirements for lighting and angles. Here are resources for 3 different video analytics:
Be careful about the accuracy of test data as the tests may be performed with camera positioning that is unrealistic for real world deployments. For instance, see this image example from i-LIDS
It's very unlikely that a camera could ever be deployed in this position. One, placing a camera on the exterior of a facility risks the theft or destruction of the camera. Two, placing a pole near a fence is a security risk. Three, often it's not even possible to place a camera in such a position because there's a road on the outside.
This position is misleading because it provides a perfect, unobstructed direct view of the target. This will result in better performance than the type of positioning that real world deployments require.
As such, test data or performance expectation needs to be evaluated in the context of the deployments that can be achieved.
See this image of an actual deployment at the Vatican (from ioimage):
The camera positioning is not theoretically ideal but given the layout probably the best that can be done.
Understanding camera positioning requirements up-front is key. Make sure the design reflects these constraints and that you can afford and are able to make any modifications that need to be done. By doing so, the probability of an optimally functioning system with minimal surprises will be maximized.
[For more information on selecting video analytics, see the premium Guide: "How to Select Video Analytics"]
Related Reports on Video Analytics
PureTech Video Analytics Examined
on Apr 21, 2017
PureTech's analytics were chosen for a US border protection system (see related post), which the company claims no other analytics vendor was able...
ObjectVideo Acquired by Alarm.com
on Mar 14, 2017
Once potentially the most recognized name in video analytics, ObjectVideo has effectively been sold for pieces.
Alarm.com has now acquired what...
Hikvision People Counting Tested
on Mar 09, 2017
People counting has historically been a difficult task, requiring specialized cameras, expensive software, and careful camera placement. But in the...
Most Recent Industry Reports
Security Robots Are Just Entertainment
on Jul 21, 2017
Great entertainment, no real security value.
That is the happy (or sad) state of security robots in 2017.
Knightscope robot's drowning, the...
Wireless Burglar Alarm Sensors Guide
on Jul 21, 2017
Wireless sensors for burglar alarm sensors are an increasingly common option for the historical labor intensive wired alarm systems.
Competing Against ADT
on Jul 20, 2017
ADT is one of the biggest players in the security industry, with ~$4 billion revenue. In 2017, they were acquired / merged with Protection...
Axis Door Station Tested (A8105-E)
on Jul 19, 2017
Axis continues their push into niche markets, especially audio, with network speakers, an IP horn, and video door stations.
We bought and tested...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide
on Jul 19, 2017
This 120 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members.
It includes our 20 manufacturer favorability rankings and 20 manufacturer...
Knightscope Laughs off Robot Drowning
on Jul 18, 2017
A day after a Knightscope robot drowned, Knightscope has issued an 'official statement' making fun of the issue:
The implied message is that...