IP Camera Bandwidth / Storage Shootout

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Mar 05, 2014

Bandwidth consumption can vary tremendously, even with the same resolution, frame rate, compression and scene, by 50% to 80% in our tests. This is because cameras process video differently (e.g., gain control applied, noise reduction technology, etc.).

The Test

We tested 16 cameras head to head to understand who is the best and worst at minimizing bandwidth consumption / storage costs.

In the 1MP category, we set these 6 cameras to 720p / 10fps:

In the 2MP category, we set these 4 cameras to 1080p / 10fps:

Additionally, we tested 6 integrated IR cameras to match up against these.

The Wrong Way

The simple, naive and wrong way is to put cameras side by side, measuring bandwidth at the same resolution and frame rate.

Why? The default compression settings of cameras vary widely by manufacturers. Though compression is often overlooked, every H.264 camera must choose a Q or quantization level (from 0 to 51). The lower number chosen, the higher the bandwidth, and the greater the compression (to learn more, see our IP Camera Manufacturer Compression Comparison). This does not make one camera 'better' or 'worse' and can be adjusted by the user.

Indeed, in IPVM testing, default compression variances routinely accounted for a massive 50%+ difference in bandwidth consumption.

Normalizing Compression

To truly and fairly measure bandwidth, compression levels must be normalized, that is, they must be set the same. Using a stream analyzer, IPVM determined the actual quantization levels and adjusted the appropriate scales so the quantization levels all would be the same for our tests (using Q=28).

Test Questions and Answers

This IPVM test help identified:

  • The 1 cameras that clearly had the lowest bandwidth consumption
  • The 1 camera that clearly had the highest bandwidth consumption
  • The 4 camera manufacturers whose default setting make them look far worse than they are
  • The tradeoff of non IR and IR cameras and how it varied by low light levels 
  • The impact of VMD
  • ********* *********** *** **** tremendously, **** **** *** same **********, ***** ****, compression *** *****, ** 50% ** **% ** our *****. **** ** because ******* ******* ***** differently (*.*., **** ******* applied, ***** ********* **********, etc.).

    The ****

    ** ****** ** ******* head ** **** ** understand *** ** *** best *** ***** ** minimizing ********* *********** / storage *****.

    ** *** *** ********, we *** ***** * cameras ** **** / 10fps:

    ** *** *** ********, we *** ***** * cameras ** ***** / 10fps:

    ************, ** ****** * integrated ** ******* ** match ** ******* *****.

    The ***** ***

    *** ******, ***** *** wrong *** ** ** put ******* **** ** side, ********* ********* ** the **** ********** *** frame ****.

    ***? *** ******* *********** settings ** ******* **** widely ** *************. ***************** ** ***** **********, every *.*** ****** **** choose * * ** quantization ***** (**** * to **). *** ***** number ******, *** ****** the *********, *** *** greater *** *********** (** learn ****, *** *** ** ****** ************ *********** Comparison). **** **** *** make *** ****** '******' or '*****' *** *** be ******** ** *** user.

    ******, ** **** *******, default *********** ********* ********* accounted *** * ******* 50%+ ********** ** ********* consumption.

    Normalizing ***********

    ** ***** *** ****** measure *********, *********** ****** must ** **********, **** is, **** **** ** set *** ****. ***** a ****** ********, **** determined *** ****** ************ levels *** ******** *** appropriate ****** ** *** quantization ****** *** ***** be *** **** *** our ***** (***** *=**).

    Test ********* *** *******

    **** **** **** **** identified:

    • *** * ******* **** clearly *** *** ****** bandwidth ***********
    • *** * ****** **** clearly *** *** ******* bandwidth ***********
    • *** * ****** ************* whose ******* ******* **** them **** *** ***** than **** ***
    • *** ******** ** *** IR *** ** ******* and *** ** ****** by *** ***** ****** 
    • *** ****** ** ***

    [***************]

    Key ********

    • ****** ********* ******* *******- ***** ********* **** model ***** ***, ********** in *** ****** *** low ***** ****** ***** savings *** **** **** 50% **** *** *****.
    • ******* ********* ****** *******- **** *** * models ***** ***, ********** in *** ****** *** low ***** ****** ***** consumption *** **** **** 50% **** *** *****.
    • ******* ******** ******- ********, *****, ******* and ****'* ******* *********** levels **** **** ***** than ****, ****** **** appear ** ** ********** worse **** ****, ***** normalization ********. ****** ***** bandwidth ***********.
    • ** ** ***-** ********: ** ~* *** (dim / ********** ****), the ***-** ******* ******** less ********* **** *** IR ****. *******, ** 0.1 *** (**** ****), the ** ******* ******** less ** *** ***-** ones ********* ****** ** with **** **** ******* levels.
    • ***** ****** **** **** 720p- ** *** *****, 1080p ********* *** **** volatile, **** ****** ****** than **** ** *** light *** **** ****** scenes.
    • *** ********* ***- **** ****.* (*** standard *** * **** add-on) *** ******* **************** where *** *** ********* VMDs ** ***.

    Technical ********

    **** *** *** *** points **** **** ****, with *** ******* ************ to ************ ** *** ************ averaging ******* ** *** 30:

    • **** ******* ******** ***** 500 **/* ** **** light, ~*** ***. *** Axis ***** *** **** SNC-VB600 **** **** **** higher **** *******, ** 700 **/* *** *** Kb/s, ************.
    • ***** ** **** ***** cameras ****** ******** ******* 1-1.5 **/*. **** *** Sony ***-***** *** ******* higher, **** * **/* 2-3x ******.
    • ** *** *****, ~* lux, ******* **** ********* was ***** *.* **/*, with ** ******* ****** high ** ***.
    • ***** ******* ** ~* lux ******* ************ *.*-*.* Mb/s, **** ** ************** ****.
    • ** *** ****, ~*.* lux, **** ******* ******* about *.* **/*. *** only **** ******* ** this **** *** *** Bosch ***-****, ***** *** at *-* **/* ***** bitrate **** *** ***** cameras.
    • ***** ******* ****** **** about *.*-** **/*. **** that ** **** ***** the******** ** *** ****** produced ** ****** ******, nearly *****, ********** *** its **** *** *******.
    • ** ** ******* ******* scene **** **** ********** of ******, **** ******* averaged ****** *.* **/*. No ******* **** ********* high ** *** ** this ****, **** * swing ** **** **** 1 **/*.
    • ***** ******* ******** ***** 4.3 **/* ** **** scene. *** ***** ***-**** and ******* ***-**** **** notably *****, ** *.* and *.* **/*, **** the ******** ** *** and **** ***** (*.* and *.* **/* ************).
    • **** ********** ** *******, with ** ** ** a **** (*.* ***) room ******** *.* **/*, with ********* *** *-*** running ***-*** **/* ****** than *** **** *****-*. Average ********* *** **** than **** *** ******* of ***/***** ******* ** t*** ********** (*.* **/*).
    • ******* ********* ** ***** integrated ** ******* *** about * **/*, ****** Avigilon's *.**-**-*** *** **** higher **** ***** *** Hikvision (*.* **/* **. 2.6-3). ******* ******** ~**% lower ******* **** ***** day/night ******* ** **** same *****. 

    Full ***** ***********

    *** ***** ***** *** our ******* ****** ********** room, ** ***** *** lux, **** * ***** of **** **** ** this *****:

    *** *********** ***** ***** image ******* ** *** cameras ** **** *****. All ******* **** ****** close ** ***** *******, with ***** ********** ** color, **********, *** *********, but ** ******* *********** in ***** *******.

    ******* ********* ** *** 720p ******* ** **** test *** ***** *** Kb/s (*.* **/*). *** Sony ***-***** *** ***** 80% ***** *******, ** 900 **/*. *** **** P3354 *** *****, ***** NBN-733V, *** ******* ***-****, all *** **/* ** below, **** ************ *** the ****** ********* ********* *********** ***** *****.

    *** *****:

    *** ******* ** *** four ***** ******* *** about *.* **/*, **** a ****** *******, ***** the ***** ********** ****, SNC-VB630, **** ******* **** 3 **/*.

    Low ***** ***********

    ** ******* *** ****** to ~* *** ** check *********** ** ********* as **** *** ***** increased, **** ****:

    ** **** ***** *****, bitrates **** ***** **********, ranging **** ******* *.* and *.* **/*, **** an ******* ** ***** 1.3.

     

    *** ***** ******* ****** were **** **** **** consistent ** * ***, with ** ******* ****** high ** ***, *** an ******* ****** *.*-*.* Mb/s. 

    Dark ***********

    ** *** ***** ****** shot, ** ******* ****** to ***** *.* *** to **** ********* *********** in * ***** **** scene:

    *** ********** ***** ***** all ******* ** **** light ***** ** ******* comparative ***********, ********** *** noise ** *** *****, first ****:

    **** ******* ** **** scene ******** ***** *.* Mb/s, **** *** **** true ******* ***** *** NBN-733V, ***** ******** *.* Mb/s, *-* **/* ***** than ***** *******. **** that *** **** ***** was ********** *** ** this *****, ****** ********* no ****** *****, ****** black.

     

    *** *****:

    ***** ******* ****** **** 7.8 ** ** **/* in **** *****. *** Avigilon *.**-**-** *** ****** black ** **** ***** level, ********** *** *** much ***** ******* **** other *******, ***** *** produced ****** ******.

    Outdoor ******* ***********

    ** ******* ********* ** a ****-****** *****, ** set ** *** ******* next ** * **** roadway, **** ** **** image:

    ****, **** ******* ******** about *.* **/*. ***** were ** ******* **** or **** ** **** case, **** * ***** of **** **** * Mb/s ******* **** (**** Q1604) *** *** (**** SNC-VB600).

     

    *** *****/*** ******* ****** averaged ***** *.* **/* in **** *****. *** Bosch ***-**** *** ******* SNB-6004 **** ******* ***** than ******** *** ****, using **-**% ** *** bandwidth.

     

    Integrated ** ***********

    ** ****** *** ********** IR ******* ** **** and ***** *********** ** see *** **** ******* bandwidth ****** ***** **** and ****** ***/***** ******* in *** **** *****. This ***** ***** *** FOV ** *** ****, with ** **:

    *** **** ***** ******** all **** *******, ******* the ******** ** ***** and ***** ****** ** each:

    ** ****, ********* ******** about *.* **/*. *** Axis *****-* *** ************* lower **** ***** *******, at *.* **/*, ****** 1.8-2 *** ********* *** Q-See. *******, **** ******* is **** ***** **** the ***/***** ******* ** our *****, ***** ******** over * **/*, **** only *** ***** ***-**** on *** **** ** lower **** **** ** counterparts.

    *** *** ***** *******:

    *** ******** *.**-**-***, ** 6.3 **/* *** ************* higher **** ***** *** Hikvision ***** ********** ** cameras ******, ********** *********** given ***** ******** ** ***********. ** **** ****, 1080p ********** ** ********* is ***** ** *** cases, **** *** ********* of *** ******** *.**-**-**. Its ******* *** **** 1.4 **/*, ****** ** delivered ** ****** ******.

    Default **. ************

    * *** ******* ********* to **** ********* ************ levels **** **** ** standardized ** ** **** test. *** ***** ***-**** and ******* ***-**** **** the ***** ******** ** this, **** ********** ** ~80% **** ******** **** default ******** ** *** standardized ************ ****** ** 28-29. The *********** *** ***** and ***** ******* *** shown ** *** ***** below.

    ***** ******* ******* ***** home *** ***** **** non-standardized ********* ******* ** likely *********. ******** ******* from ************* ***** *** immediately ******* ******* *************** will *********** **** *******, as ********* *** ******* needs **** ** **** greater **** **** ***********, such ** ****, *** default ** ****** ************ levels.

    ***** *** *** ******** used *** **** ****** in ***** ** ******* an ******* ************ ** 28:

    ******* *** ***** **** about *************' ******* ************ and ********* ****** ** our ** ****** *********** ******.

    Motion ********* *********** ******

    ***** *********** ** ************ ******* record **** ** ******, *** ***********, ************ false ******** *********, *** have * **** ****** on ******* *****. ** our *****, ** ***** that ******** ****** ********* ******* **** ******** **** ** Axis *** *.* *** Mobotix **************** ******* ***** positives **** ******** *******, as **** ** ***** caused ** ********* ****, in ****** *** ****** tested. 

    ***** ****** **** *** our ***** ** ******** VMD **** ***** ****** manufacturers *** **** *********** information. *********** ** **** manufacturer ****** ********* ** the *****, ** ***** reports ******* *** *************** for ****:

Comments (20)

We are happy to take questions on specific scenes or cameras, and consider other test scenarios. When discussing your own bandwidth experiences, keep in mind whether they have been normalized or not, and the variances this may cause.

Comprehensive! One question I have (also relating to the forerunner camera compression test by Derek) is for at least the Bosch, Derek seemed to indicate a seperate q setting for i vs p frames, does your test tool take this into account and how?

Bosch does include separate Q settings for I and P frames. Well technically it's one fixed setting plus a delta setting, so you don't directly set them with a Q value. AVInaptic measures an overall average of quantization, which we standardized to 28.

Excellent report. I hoped though that Arecont is included next as Arecont has a lot of claims that many people dont believe whole heartedly

Hello.

What do you mean by saying "Arecont has a lot of claims that many people dont believe whole heartedly". What "claims"?

The undisclosed maybe referring to something like this:

The higher-resolution panoramic view of the new 20 megapixel/180-degree H.264 camera can be used to replace up to 65 conventional cameras.

Taken from something like this.

I know this "great marketing" :-) . I thought that by "claims" Undisclosed A Integrator meant something related to the topic (bandwidth, storage). Is it only my observation that Arecont has problems with keeping CBR really constant?

How did Mobotix make it into the report for VMD, but you did not have one of their cameras in the shootout?

This report helped to solidify the "Q" rating bits of knowledge I had.

Thanks!

Because Mobotix is one of few manufacturers doing "advanced" VMD, so it was tested along with Axis months ago. That test ties into this one as far as storage reduction goes, a key factor.

can you remind me why Panasonic is not included?

A couple reasons. They haven't released much in the past year or so, so testing the two-year-old SP509 against other cameras which are new generation is unfair. Second, integrator interest has dropped, with only a few integrators citing them as a favorite in our last survey, down from being one of the most popular.

That being said, I just got an email talking about their new generation the other day, which is claiming better performance all around. We'll keep an eye on that at least.

Incredible report, thank you.

Thanks for the feedback everyone.

I wanted to make it clear that we will adopt this same methodology to future tests so as we test other cameras we can use this as a baseline and contrast their performance to this set. This will help determine true bandwidth savings / issues.

Would it be cheeky to ask if you could translate this into the amount of days each camera would have on a set amount of storage ?

I really like your testing procedure, but i have doubt about which camera brand and camera model you wish to make a test. Can you make a test for all top 10 world class IP surveillance manufacturer?, i saw a not famous IP Camera brand like GeoVision, Q-See, Dahua on the list, and you abandon some big name in the industry like VIVOTEK, Pelco, Panasonic and some Brand you take 2 cameras which is not quite fair for evaluation.

Please make sure that you are doing a fair pick up the camera for test from the well known manufacturer.

Sakchai,

Dahua is one of the 10 biggest manufacturers in the world so they may not be as 'famous' to you, but they are a very big player.

There are lots of camera manufacturers. We'll continue to test them (we have an upcoming test on Pelco, and will test the new Panasonics as they roll out). We've tested a few Vivotek cameras in the past year and will continue to test them.

John

Dear John,

I am a big fan of AXIS and VIVOTEK IP Camera, i thnk it is quite good quality camera. I looking forward to see the comparison between Top10 IP Camera Manufacturer.

Could you provide me an information of who is TOP10 Network Camera for the year 2014 ? (Sales Performance in 2013)

So we can make sure we are choosing the right product to implement in my project.

No, we strongly discourage people making decisions based on sales numbers, as they often do not reflect what is the best quality or best fit for specific applications.

You may want to check out Favorite IP Camera Manufacturers 2014 for color commentary on what others are choosing and why.

these vendors don't even call the settings by the same terminology in some cases. wish you had documented what settings you use (compare Axis to Bosch, for example.) It's very hard to do apples-to-apples.

Rodney, we have documented it here: IP Camera Manufacturer Compression Comparison. Here's the key table:

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Hikvision DeepinView Camera Analytics Tested on May 08, 2019
Hikvision is expanding its 'deep learning' offerings with a new camera series called 'DeepinView' claiming false alarm reduction and improved...
Dahua ePoE Long Distance UTP / Coax Tested on May 03, 2019
Dahua's Enhanced PoE (ePoE) line is claiming extended video and power transmission over 600m without repeaters, with devices interchangeable via...
Registration Closed - Spring 2019 IP Networking Course on May 02, 2019
Register now for the Spring 2019 IP Networking course here - Closed. Last chance now.   This is the only networking course designed specifically...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
LenelS2 Launches VRx Video Platform on Apr 29, 2019
For years, S2's video management platform, the NetVR, was based on Exacq. Now, after years of internal development, S2 has launched its own...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...
Amazon Ring Public Subsidy Program Aims To Dominate Residential Security on May 20, 2019
Amazon dominates market after market. Quitely, but increasingly, they are doing so in residential security, through a combination of significant...
LifeSafety Power NetLink Vulnerabilities And Problematic Response on May 20, 2019
'Power supplies' are not devices that many think about when considering vulnerabilities but as more and more devices go 'online', the risks for...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Inside Look Into Scam Market Research on May 17, 2019
Scam market research has exploded over the last few years becoming the most commonly cited 'statistics' for most industries, despite there clearly...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Trump Signs 'Huawei Ban' - Executive Order Targeting Foreign Adversary Technology on May 16, 2019
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order targeting technology provided by 'foreign adversaries', in what is widely being called a...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact