IP Camera Bandwidth / Storage Shootout

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Mar 05, 2014

Bandwidth consumption can vary tremendously, even with the same resolution, frame rate, compression and scene, by 50% to 80% in our tests. This is because cameras process video differently (e.g., gain control applied, noise reduction technology, etc.).

The Test

We tested 16 cameras head to head to understand who is the best and worst at minimizing bandwidth consumption / storage costs.

In the 1MP category, we set these 6 cameras to 720p / 10fps:

In the 2MP category, we set these 4 cameras to 1080p / 10fps:

Additionally, we tested 6 integrated IR cameras to match up against these.

The Wrong Way

The simple, naive and wrong way is to put cameras side by side, measuring bandwidth at the same resolution and frame rate.

Why? The default compression settings of cameras vary widely by manufacturers. Though compression is often overlooked, every H.264 camera must choose a Q or quantization level (from 0 to 51). The lower number chosen, the higher the bandwidth, and the greater the compression (to learn more, see our IP Camera Manufacturer Compression Comparison). This does not make one camera 'better' or 'worse' and can be adjusted by the user.

Indeed, in IPVM testing, default compression variances routinely accounted for a massive 50%+ difference in bandwidth consumption.

Normalizing Compression

To truly and fairly measure bandwidth, compression levels must be normalized, that is, they must be set the same. Using a stream analyzer, IPVM determined the actual quantization levels and adjusted the appropriate scales so the quantization levels all would be the same for our tests (using Q=28).

Test Questions and Answers

This IPVM test help identified:

  • The 1 cameras that clearly had the lowest bandwidth consumption
  • The 1 camera that clearly had the highest bandwidth consumption
  • The 4 camera manufacturers whose default setting make them look far worse than they are
  • The tradeoff of non IR and IR cameras and how it varied by low light levels 
  • The impact of VMD
  • ********* *********** *** **** tremendously, **** **** *** same **********, ***** ****, compression *** *****, ** 50% ** **% ** our *****. **** ** because ******* ******* ***** differently (*.*., **** ******* applied, ***** ********* **********, etc.).

    The ****

    ** ****** ** ******* head ** **** ** understand *** ** *** best *** ***** ** minimizing ********* *********** / storage *****.

    ** *** *** ********, we *** ***** * cameras ** **** / 10fps:

    ** *** *** ********, we *** ***** * cameras ** ***** / 10fps:

    ************, ** ****** * integrated ** ******* ** match ** ******* *****.

    The ***** ***

    *** ******, ***** *** wrong *** ** ** put ******* **** ** side, ********* ********* ** the **** ********** *** frame ****.

    ***? *** ******* *********** settings ** ******* **** widely ** *************. ***************** ** ***** **********, every *.*** ****** **** choose * * ** quantization ***** (**** * to **). *** ***** number ******, *** ****** the *********, *** *** greater *** *********** (** learn ****, *** *** ** ****** ************ *********** Comparison). **** **** *** make *** ****** '******' or '*****' *** *** be ******** ** *** user.

    ******, ** **** *******, default *********** ********* ********* accounted *** * ******* 50%+ ********** ** ********* consumption.

    Normalizing ***********

    ** ***** *** ****** measure *********, *********** ****** must ** **********, **** is, **** **** ** set *** ****. ***** a ****** ********, **** determined *** ****** ************ levels *** ******** *** appropriate ****** ** *** quantization ****** *** ***** be *** **** *** our ***** (***** *=**).

    Test ********* *** *******

    **** **** **** **** identified:

    • *** * ******* **** clearly *** *** ****** bandwidth ***********
    • *** * ****** **** clearly *** *** ******* bandwidth ***********
    • *** * ****** ************* whose ******* ******* **** them **** *** ***** than **** ***
    • *** ******** ** *** IR *** ** ******* and *** ** ****** by *** ***** ****** 
    • *** ****** ** ***

    [***************]

    Key ********

    • ****** ********* ******* *******- ***** ********* **** model ***** ***, ********** in *** ****** *** low ***** ****** ***** savings *** **** **** 50% **** *** *****.
    • ******* ********* ****** *******- **** *** * models ***** ***, ********** in *** ****** *** low ***** ****** ***** consumption *** **** **** 50% **** *** *****.
    • ******* ******** ******- ********, *****, ******* and ****'* ******* *********** levels **** **** ***** than ****, ****** **** appear ** ** ********** worse **** ****, ***** normalization ********. ****** ***** bandwidth ***********.
    • ** ** ***-** ********: ** ~* *** (dim / ********** ****), the ***-** ******* ******** less ********* **** *** IR ****. *******, ** 0.1 *** (**** ****), the ** ******* ******** less ** *** ***-** ones ********* ****** ** with **** **** ******* levels.
    • ***** ****** **** **** 720p- ** *** *****, 1080p ********* *** **** volatile, **** ****** ****** than **** ** *** light *** **** ****** scenes.
    • *** ********* ***- **** ****.* (*** standard *** * **** add-on) *** ******* **************** where *** *** ********* VMDs ** ***.

    Technical ********

    **** *** *** *** points **** **** ****, with *** ******* ************ to ************ ** *** ************ averaging ******* ** *** 30:

    • **** ******* ******** ***** 500 **/* ** **** light, ~*** ***. *** Axis ***** *** **** SNC-VB600 **** **** **** higher **** *******, ** 700 **/* *** *** Kb/s, ************.
    • ***** ** **** ***** cameras ****** ******** ******* 1-1.5 **/*. **** *** Sony ***-***** *** ******* higher, **** * **/* 2-3x ******.
    • ** *** *****, ~* lux, ******* **** ********* was ***** *.* **/*, with ** ******* ****** high ** ***.
    • ***** ******* ** ~* lux ******* ************ *.*-*.* Mb/s, **** ** ************** ****.
    • ** *** ****, ~*.* lux, **** ******* ******* about *.* **/*. *** only **** ******* ** this **** *** *** Bosch ***-****, ***** *** at *-* **/* ***** bitrate **** *** ***** cameras.
    • ***** ******* ****** **** about *.*-** **/*. **** that ** **** ***** the******** ** *** ****** produced ** ****** ******, nearly *****, ********** *** its **** *** *******.
    • ** ** ******* ******* scene **** **** ********** of ******, **** ******* averaged ****** *.* **/*. No ******* **** ********* high ** *** ** this ****, **** * swing ** **** **** 1 **/*.
    • ***** ******* ******** ***** 4.3 **/* ** **** scene. *** ***** ***-**** and ******* ***-**** **** notably *****, ** *.* and *.* **/*, **** the ******** ** *** and **** ***** (*.* and *.* **/* ************).
    • **** ********** ** *******, with ** ** ** a **** (*.* ***) room ******** *.* **/*, with ********* *** *-*** running ***-*** **/* ****** than *** **** *****-*. Average ********* *** **** than **** *** ******* of ***/***** ******* ** t*** ********** (*.* **/*).
    • ******* ********* ** ***** integrated ** ******* *** about * **/*, ****** Avigilon's *.**-**-*** *** **** higher **** ***** *** Hikvision (*.* **/* **. 2.6-3). ******* ******** ~**% lower ******* **** ***** day/night ******* ** **** same *****. 

    Full ***** ***********

    *** ***** ***** *** our ******* ****** ********** room, ** ***** *** lux, **** * ***** of **** **** ** this *****:

    *** *********** ***** ***** image ******* ** *** cameras ** **** *****. All ******* **** ****** close ** ***** *******, with ***** ********** ** color, **********, *** *********, but ** ******* *********** in ***** *******.

    ******* ********* ** *** 720p ******* ** **** test *** ***** *** Kb/s (*.* **/*). *** Sony ***-***** *** ***** 80% ***** *******, ** 900 **/*. *** **** P3354 *** *****, ***** NBN-733V, *** ******* ***-****, all *** **/* ** below, **** ************ *** the ****** ********* ********* *********** ***** *****.

    *** *****:

    *** ******* ** *** four ***** ******* *** about *.* **/*, **** a ****** *******, ***** the ***** ********** ****, SNC-VB630, **** ******* **** 3 **/*.

    Low ***** ***********

    ** ******* *** ****** to ~* *** ** check *********** ** ********* as **** *** ***** increased, **** ****:

    ** **** ***** *****, bitrates **** ***** **********, ranging **** ******* *.* and *.* **/*, **** an ******* ** ***** 1.3.

     

    *** ***** ******* ****** were **** **** **** consistent ** * ***, with ** ******* ****** high ** ***, *** an ******* ****** *.*-*.* Mb/s. 

    Dark ***********

    ** *** ***** ****** shot, ** ******* ****** to ***** *.* *** to **** ********* *********** in * ***** **** scene:

    *** ********** ***** ***** all ******* ** **** light ***** ** ******* comparative ***********, ********** *** noise ** *** *****, first ****:

    **** ******* ** **** scene ******** ***** *.* Mb/s, **** *** **** true ******* ***** *** NBN-733V, ***** ******** *.* Mb/s, *-* **/* ***** than ***** *******. **** that *** **** ***** was ********** *** ** this *****, ****** ********* no ****** *****, ****** black.

     

    *** *****:

    ***** ******* ****** **** 7.8 ** ** **/* in **** *****. *** Avigilon *.**-**-** *** ****** black ** **** ***** level, ********** *** *** much ***** ******* **** other *******, ***** *** produced ****** ******.

    Outdoor ******* ***********

    ** ******* ********* ** a ****-****** *****, ** set ** *** ******* next ** * **** roadway, **** ** **** image:

    ****, **** ******* ******** about *.* **/*. ***** were ** ******* **** or **** ** **** case, **** * ***** of **** **** * Mb/s ******* **** (**** Q1604) *** *** (**** SNC-VB600).

     

    *** *****/*** ******* ****** averaged ***** *.* **/* in **** *****. *** Bosch ***-**** *** ******* SNB-6004 **** ******* ***** than ******** *** ****, using **-**% ** *** bandwidth.

     

    Integrated ** ***********

    ** ****** *** ********** IR ******* ** **** and ***** *********** ** see *** **** ******* bandwidth ****** ***** **** and ****** ***/***** ******* in *** **** *****. This ***** ***** *** FOV ** *** ****, with ** **:

    *** **** ***** ******** all **** *******, ******* the ******** ** ***** and ***** ****** ** each:

    ** ****, ********* ******** about *.* **/*. *** Axis *****-* *** ************* lower **** ***** *******, at *.* **/*, ****** 1.8-2 *** ********* *** Q-See. *******, **** ******* is **** ***** **** the ***/***** ******* ** our *****, ***** ******** over * **/*, **** only *** ***** ***-**** on *** **** ** lower **** **** ** counterparts.

    *** *** ***** *******:

    *** ******** *.**-**-***, ** 6.3 **/* *** ************* higher **** ***** *** Hikvision ***** ********** ** cameras ******, ********** *********** given ***** ******** ** ***********. ** **** ****, 1080p ********** ** ********* is ***** ** *** cases, **** *** ********* of *** ******** *.**-**-**. Its ******* *** **** 1.4 **/*, ****** ** delivered ** ****** ******.

    Default **. ************

    * *** ******* ********* to **** ********* ************ levels **** **** ** standardized ** ** **** test. *** ***** ***-**** and ******* ***-**** **** the ***** ******** ** this, **** ********** ** ~80% **** ******** **** default ******** ** *** standardized ************ ****** ** 28-29. The *********** *** ***** and ***** ******* *** shown ** *** ***** below.

    ***** ******* ******* ***** home *** ***** **** non-standardized ********* ******* ** likely *********. ******** ******* from ************* ***** *** immediately ******* ******* *************** will *********** **** *******, as ********* *** ******* needs **** ** **** greater **** **** ***********, such ** ****, *** default ** ****** ************ levels.

    ***** *** *** ******** used *** **** ****** in ***** ** ******* an ******* ************ ** 28:

    ******* *** ***** **** about *************' ******* ************ and ********* ****** ** our ** ****** *********** ******.

    Motion ********* *********** ******

    ***** *********** ** ************ ******* record **** ** ******, *** ***********, ************ false ******** *********, *** have * **** ****** on ******* *****. ** our *****, ** ***** that ******** ****** ********* ******* **** ******** **** ** Axis *** *.* *** Mobotix **************** ******* ***** positives **** ******** *******, as **** ** ***** caused ** ********* ****, in ****** *** ****** tested. 

    ***** ****** **** *** our ***** ** ******** VMD **** ***** ****** manufacturers *** **** *********** information. *********** ** **** manufacturer ****** ********* ** the *****, ** ***** reports ******* *** *************** for ****:

Comments (20)

We are happy to take questions on specific scenes or cameras, and consider other test scenarios. When discussing your own bandwidth experiences, keep in mind whether they have been normalized or not, and the variances this may cause.

Comprehensive! One question I have (also relating to the forerunner camera compression test by Derek) is for at least the Bosch, Derek seemed to indicate a seperate q setting for i vs p frames, does your test tool take this into account and how?

Bosch does include separate Q settings for I and P frames. Well technically it's one fixed setting plus a delta setting, so you don't directly set them with a Q value. AVInaptic measures an overall average of quantization, which we standardized to 28.

Excellent report. I hoped though that Arecont is included next as Arecont has a lot of claims that many people dont believe whole heartedly

Hello.

What do you mean by saying "Arecont has a lot of claims that many people dont believe whole heartedly". What "claims"?

The undisclosed maybe referring to something like this:

The higher-resolution panoramic view of the new 20 megapixel/180-degree H.264 camera can be used to replace up to 65 conventional cameras.

Taken from something like this.

I know this "great marketing" :-) . I thought that by "claims" Undisclosed A Integrator meant something related to the topic (bandwidth, storage). Is it only my observation that Arecont has problems with keeping CBR really constant?

How did Mobotix make it into the report for VMD, but you did not have one of their cameras in the shootout?

This report helped to solidify the "Q" rating bits of knowledge I had.

Thanks!

Because Mobotix is one of few manufacturers doing "advanced" VMD, so it was tested along with Axis months ago. That test ties into this one as far as storage reduction goes, a key factor.

can you remind me why Panasonic is not included?

A couple reasons. They haven't released much in the past year or so, so testing the two-year-old SP509 against other cameras which are new generation is unfair. Second, integrator interest has dropped, with only a few integrators citing them as a favorite in our last survey, down from being one of the most popular.

That being said, I just got an email talking about their new generation the other day, which is claiming better performance all around. We'll keep an eye on that at least.

Incredible report, thank you.

Thanks for the feedback everyone.

I wanted to make it clear that we will adopt this same methodology to future tests so as we test other cameras we can use this as a baseline and contrast their performance to this set. This will help determine true bandwidth savings / issues.

Would it be cheeky to ask if you could translate this into the amount of days each camera would have on a set amount of storage ?

I really like your testing procedure, but i have doubt about which camera brand and camera model you wish to make a test. Can you make a test for all top 10 world class IP surveillance manufacturer?, i saw a not famous IP Camera brand like GeoVision, Q-See, Dahua on the list, and you abandon some big name in the industry like VIVOTEK, Pelco, Panasonic and some Brand you take 2 cameras which is not quite fair for evaluation.

Please make sure that you are doing a fair pick up the camera for test from the well known manufacturer.

Sakchai,

Dahua is one of the 10 biggest manufacturers in the world so they may not be as 'famous' to you, but they are a very big player.

There are lots of camera manufacturers. We'll continue to test them (we have an upcoming test on Pelco, and will test the new Panasonics as they roll out). We've tested a few Vivotek cameras in the past year and will continue to test them.

John

Dear John,

I am a big fan of AXIS and VIVOTEK IP Camera, i thnk it is quite good quality camera. I looking forward to see the comparison between Top10 IP Camera Manufacturer.

Could you provide me an information of who is TOP10 Network Camera for the year 2014 ? (Sales Performance in 2013)

So we can make sure we are choosing the right product to implement in my project.

No, we strongly discourage people making decisions based on sales numbers, as they often do not reflect what is the best quality or best fit for specific applications.

You may want to check out Favorite IP Camera Manufacturers 2014 for color commentary on what others are choosing and why.

these vendors don't even call the settings by the same terminology in some cases. wish you had documented what settings you use (compare Axis to Bosch, for example.) It's very hard to do apples-to-apples.

Rodney, we have documented it here: IP Camera Manufacturer Compression Comparison. Here's the key table:

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Avigilon H4 Intercom Tested on Nov 20, 2019
Avigilon is well-known for video surveillance and access, but how well does the company's intercom work? We purchased and tested Avigilon's H4...
Hikvision Dual Lens Face Recognition Camera Tested on Nov 19, 2019
Hikvision's Dual Lens Facial Recognition camera, claims that it "adopts advanced deep learning algorithm and powerful GPU to realize instant face...
Color Low Light Mega Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Speco, Sony, Vivotek on Nov 12, 2019
This is the biggest color low light shootout ever, testing 20+ super low light models from 10 manufacturers: Increasingly, each manufacturer...
Biggest Low Light Problems 2019 on Nov 08, 2019
Over 150 integrators responded to our survey question: "What are the biggest problems you face getting good low-light images?" Inside, we share...
Rhombus Cameras, VMS and Analytics Tested on Nov 06, 2019
Rhombus boasts they have created "the new standard in Enterprise, cloud-managed video security" and told IPVM in January 2019 they offer twice the...
90+ Companies Profile Directory on Nov 06, 2019
While IPVM covers the largest companies in the industry regularly (like Axis, Dahua, Hikvision, etc.), IPVM strives to do a profile post on each...
Avigilon Appearance Search Tested on Oct 30, 2019
Avigilon Appearance Search claims that it "sorts through hours of video with ease, to quickly locate a specific person or vehicle of interest...
Illustra Pro Gen3 4K Camera Tested on Oct 23, 2019
Johnson Controls has released the latest generation in their Illustra Pro line, the Pro Mini-Dome Gen 3, a non-OEM model claiming to "optimize...
Integrated IR Camera Usage Statistics 2019 on Oct 21, 2019
Virtually every IP camera now comes with integrated IR but how many actually make use of IR or choose 'super' low light cameras without IR? In...
Pelco Sarix Pro3 Camera Tested on Oct 16, 2019
Pelco has released their Sarix Professional Series 3 cameras, claiming "more security detail in challenging scenes with excellent low light and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon H4 Intercom Tested on Nov 20, 2019
Avigilon is well-known for video surveillance and access, but how well does the company's intercom work? We purchased and tested Avigilon's H4...
The Cowardly, Greedy "Leaders" of Video Surveillance - SIA on Nov 19, 2019
The video surveillance industry suffers from cowardly, greedy 'leaders' focused on maximizing easy money while undermining public trust. The...
Hikvision Dual Lens Face Recognition Camera Tested on Nov 19, 2019
Hikvision's Dual Lens Facial Recognition camera, claims that it "adopts advanced deep learning algorithm and powerful GPU to realize instant face...
Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2019 on Nov 18, 2019
2019 has been an explosive year for video surveillance, with the world's two largest manufacturers, Dahua and Hikvision, being sanctioned for human...
Hidden Camera Detectors Tested on Nov 18, 2019
Hidden cameras are a growing problem as cameras become smaller, cheaper and easier to access. However, some companies claim to be able to detect...
Wyze Fires Back at JCI - Your Patents Are Invalid, Pay All Of Our Costs on Nov 18, 2019
Goliath JCI targeted startup Wyze this summer alleging the fast-growing consumer startup was violating a slew of JCI's patents. Now, Wyze has...
ADT Stock Surges - "Leading The Commercial Space" on Nov 15, 2019
Don't call it comeback... but maybe call it a commercial provider. ADT, whose stock dropped by as much as 2/3rds since IPOing in 2018, has now...
Gatekeeper Security Company Profile - Detecting Faces Inside Vehicles on Nov 14, 2019
Border security is a common discussion in mainstream US news and politics, as is the use of banned Chinese equipment by US Government agencies....
Hikvision CEO And Vice-Chair Under PRC Government Investigation on Nov 14, 2019
In a surprising and globally covered move, Hikvision CEO Hu Yangzhong and Vice-Chairman Gong Hongjia are being investigated by China's securities...
Camera Field of View (FoV) Guide on Nov 13, 2019
Field of View (FoV) and Angle of View (AoV), are deceptively complex. At their most basic, they simply describe what the camera can "see" and seem...