BRS Labs Raises $18 Million

By: John Honovich, Published on May 14, 2015

Let the money flow.

After a few years of relative quiet, BRS Labs is back fund raising in a big way, with ~$18 million coming in.

We break down the raise and the impact in this note.

*** *** ***** ****.

***** * *** ***** of ******** *****, *** Labs ** **** **** raising ** * *** way, **** ~$** ******* coming **.

** ***** **** *** raise *** *** ****** in **** ****.

[***************]

*** **** *** ****** ~$18 *******,***** ******* * *** Filings, **** * ******* investment ** $*,*** **** 41, **, ** *** 79 ********* ****** ** the * ********** *******.

*** ******* *** **** promising ** ************* ***** surveillance / ********* *** 7 ***** (*** ******** ******** **** ****).

** *** *******, *** company *** ****** ******* **** $*** *******. *******, *********** ****** ******* *** financial ************** ****** ***** *** expectation. ** ****, *** company *** **** **** were***** ** ** ****** this ****(****) *** *******, ***** is **** **** ******* now.

*** **** ******* ** be ******** **** ** SCADA ******* *** ******** sold **** ** ********** ******** ******* ** Avigilon. ***** **** ****** VP ** *****, * security ******** *******,******** *** **** ** IDIS.

*** **** *** ***** really ********* *** ********** they ***** ** ***** surveillance *** **** **** fund *******, **** ****** to **** **** ** try **** ****** *** expand *******.

Comments (17)

I wonder what story is being told to support this next round of funding? What compelling products are investors hearing about to convince them that a decent payoff is just around the corner?

Personally, I think we're on the verge of a real breakthrough that's driven as much by price as technology.

About 5 years ago I recall some great marketing (3VR? BRS Labs? Panoptics?) showing visualizations of transparent facilities in which you could see people and dynamic objects moving around in real time. Since it never delivered, it seems that back then, this objective was a bridge too far. However, it made for a very compelling story. That very clear, integrated view was something people could identify with and want. Contrast that with today's product: largely unstructured video. Multiple unrelated views. A world view that is really incoherent and challenging for a human to visualize and comprehend. Just following one person through multiple views and perspectives is a very significant cognitive workload.

An intuitive integrated view could help people to understand what's happening right now and to quickly grasp situations as they unfold. The simplicity and clarity should sell itself.

The tools to make it happen already exist in one form or another. Video games and graphics have developed much of the background technologies, to where they are almost commodities today. Today we use standard processors to geo-register and display imagery as its collected. We can rapidly and efficiently texture map images onto 3D models. We can develop 3D models from multiple views of an object. Cell phone imagers are so inexpensive that it's difficult to purchase a cell phone without any camera. Microsoft's Windows-integrated Kinect sells for $150 with both RGB and Infrared cameras providing depth information per pixel, admittedly with only 0.3 megapixel per imager. With sensors providing depth data per pixel, unified 3D visualization becomes much more precise and efficient.

Still, it's quite another thing for 3D sensing with unified transparent visualization to become accessible and affordable.

It may still be too costly to deliver such a capability to most residential settings. Each area would need two or three overlapping 2D views with depth information in order to reconstruct a comprehensive 3D view with 360 degree texture mapped surfaces. Just for an outside residential yard, I'd think you would need 10 or 12 ranging imagers to enable such a view. Add the cost of processing and installation and it would still be quite a substantial price.

Software development costs needn't be huge if the system sold widely.

So, what do you think? Is cost the largest barrier? How long can it be before video surveillance loses its opacity and becomes transparent and intuitive enough for the rest of us?

(P.S. I'm not a salesman, just an enthusiast :)

Disclosure: I'm the president of Fortem.

Hi Horace, we are the developers of Omnipresence 3D, a 3D security management software that implements some of what you described (e.g. 3D video projection on a map, automatically bring up the most relevant cameras as you move within the map). If you're interested you can see demo videos on our web site: fortem.com. Like you, I think that 3D sensing will eventually become very helpful for security. Unfortunately, the Kinect and similar consumer devices still have important limitations that make them unsuitable for most security facilities:

- They have a range limited to a few meters at best

- their field of view cannot overlap with each others (the IR patterns interfere with each other... there are tricks to avoid the interference but they are severely limited)

- they work best indoor, when there is no infrared light source nearby, e.g. no direct sunlight.

To come back to the subject of BRS Labs... I'm in awe that they have been able to raise so much money. I assume there must have been some down-rounds and disatisfied investors.

"I assume there must have been some down-rounds and disatisfied investors."

Haters gonna hate :)

I am not sure what magic BRS Labs has to continue to raise such money but they have certainly turned it into an art form.

What compelling products are investors hearing about to convince them that a decent payoff is just around the corner?

Note: this is just my own speculation.

Take a look at the actual EDGAR filings. The sheer number of them for such a small company is...interesting.

Also look at the number of investors for a given round size. Like this $11.5M across 79 investors. Or this, $6M across 91 investors with a lowest amount of $60,000 invested.

Compare BRS filings to VideoIQ filings (another "analytics" company). For example, this filing, $6M across *8* investors.

BRS Labs has never, to my recollection, announced any name brand or strategic investors. You don't see Kleiner or even local Houston VC's investing in BRS. An older press release even mentions that they were raising money from "high net worth individuals" ($12m across 25 investors in that release).

What I am getting at is that I don't think the typical BRS investor is a "professional" investor. Their primary investor is more of the "friends and family" kind of tier. Lots of people who hear a compelling pitch, some fear mongering and talk of "the possibilities" (again, just my speculation).

I think it is very telling that despite all the hype of BRS labs, and all the money they have raised that no "professionals" seem to want a stake in this company. There is an administrative burden to having so many investors. By law, you have to send out board minutes and updates to all your share holders, their postage fees alone probably cost more than some similar sized companies spend on Christmas parties.

It's not uncommon for startups to pivot, which is what BRS did here. They've pivoted from video analytics, to "SCADA" (which is really a much more vague focus). This also gives them, IMO, a great opportunity to go out and raise even more money with a new pitch and a new round of hype.

Also, it's very common that investors get some form of preferred shares, with a caveat that they need to re-up in future rounds or else their shares convert to common stock. That means you can "influence" people into investing in additional rounds otherwise their initial investment essentially becomes diminished value.

I've seen some people that make very good CEO's in the sense that they have a knack for telling a good story and raising lots and lots of money over time. It becomes a lucrative job for them, they take a nice salary and look busy, get a few mentions in the press, and just keep the momentum going for a while. Nothing ever really pans out for the company, but the executives earn a pretty good living. I'm not sure what the future holds for BRS labs, but I would wager the majority of their investors will be lucky to break even on their investment over time.

"What I am getting at is that I don't think the typical BRS investor is a "professional" investor. Their primary investor is more of the "friends and family" kind of tier."

Yes, that has been my impression from talking to more than 10 people who reached out to us saying they are investors.

"I think it is very telling that despite all the hype of BRS labs, and all the money they have raised that no "professionals" seem to want a stake in this company."

I am not sure how many are professional. Minimally though there is a much higher number / concentration of 'normal rich people' than professional investors than what typically happens in a company fund raising. To that end, I do agree that is a concern.

As a long time investor in BRS I can say it's has not been an easy ride...with that

said I really like the direction they are heading...revenues in 2014 weren't great but they were GOOD...I believe the future looks much brighter.

As an invester, do you receive an *audited* financials report anually?

Yes

After $150 million in funding, what's good? $50 - $100 million in 2014 revenue? More?

all I can say is buy some stock if you have the opportunity

LMAO...now that's funny!

all I can say is buy some stock if you have the opportunity

I'm a little strapped right now, would you consider loaning me some for a short bit? Promise I'll get them back to you, with interest! ;)

You might find it interesting to invest in Fortem. I think that company has a much more modest valuation and has good growth potential. You should buy some stock if you have the opportunity.

Christian

Disclosure: I'm the president of Fortem. ;-)

No, no, no, Christian.

You are doing it all wrong. You need to throw out a crazy valuation and make wild impossible growth claims. Then raise money from mom and pop investors.

Hi John, thanks for your advice. ;-)

I try to avoid lawyers, I prefer the company of engineers and security guys, so I'll stick with trying to build a better product, hopefully that will work out ok.

Christian

Both ways work for raising money...crazy valuation and impossible growth claims just works BETTER.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Sales Turnover At Anyvision on Feb 13, 2019
Anyvision raised a $43 million Series A and according to their newest investor: what you need to do is push the gas pedal and build an...
OpenALPR Acquired By Mysterious Novume on Mar 13, 2019
Startup OpenALPR has been acquired by Novume, a company virtually unknown in the industry. While there are many LPR providers (see our directory),...
Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied on Apr 10, 2019
One of the most ambitious integrator rollups of the decade has reached its conclusion—selling to a mega guard company. Allied Universal has...
Verkada Gets Half Billion Dollar Valuation on Apr 26, 2019
Last week, when we profiled Verkada (The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada), we predicted they would raise $40...
OpenALPR Doubles Prices on Jun 06, 2019
There is no 'race to the bottom' in cloud / AI video surveillance. In May, Verkada increased their prices. Now, OpenALPR is doing the same with a...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Alarm.com Acquires OpenEye on Oct 21, 2019
Alarm.com is targeting commercial expansion and now they have a commercial cloud VMS with the acquisition of OpenEye. In this note, based on...
Struggling Arcules Changes Chief Revenue Officer on Oct 29, 2019
Canon / Milestone spinout Arcules has struggled, now changing their Chief Revenue Officer, just a year after he came on board. The issue is not...
ADT Stock Surges - "Leading The Commercial Space" on Nov 15, 2019
Don't call it comeback... but maybe call it a commercial provider. ADT, whose stock dropped by as much as 2/3rds since IPOing in 2018, has now...

Most Recent Industry Reports

"Hikvision Football Arena" Lithuania Causes Controversy on Jan 24, 2020
Controversy has arisen in Lithuania over Hikvision becoming a soccer team's top sponsor and gaining naming rights to their arena, with one local MP...
Axis and Genetec Drop IFSEC 2020 on Jan 23, 2020
Two of the best-known video surveillance manufacturers are dropping IFSEC International 2020, joining Milestone who dropped IFSEC in 2019. The...
Multipoint Door Lock Tutorial on Jan 23, 2020
Despite widespread use, locked doors are notoriously weak at stopping entry, and thousands can be misspent on locks that leave doors quite...
Avigilon Shifts Cloud Strategy - Merges Blue and ACC on Jan 23, 2020
Avigilon is shifting its cloud strategy, phasing out its Blue web-managed surveillance platform as a stand-alone brand and merging it with its ACC...
Verkada Paying $100 For Referrals Just To Demo on Jan 22, 2020
Some companies pay for referrals when the referral becomes a customer. Verkada is taking it to the next level - paying $100 referrals fees simply...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...
Intersec 2020 Final Show Report on Jan 21, 2020
IPVM spent all 3 days at the Intersec 2020 show interviewing various companies and finding key trends. We cover: Middle East Enterprise...
Vehicle & Long Range Access Reader Tutorial on Jan 21, 2020
One of the classic challenges for access control are parking lots and garages, where the user's credential is far from the reader. With modern...
Clearview AI Alarm - NY Times Report Says "Might End Privacy" on Jan 20, 2020
Over the weekend, the NY Times released a report titled "The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It" about a company named...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2020 on Jan 20, 2020
The past 2 years of US bans and sanctions have shaken the video surveillance industry but what impact would this have on integrators' favorite...