Bosch Person / Car / Bike / Truck Analytics Tested

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Jun 05, 2015

Automatically identify what objects are persons vs cars vs bikes vs trucks. That is the new feature and claim from Bosch in their newest IVA analytics (6.10 version). 

We first tested Bosch IVA here. With this new feature, we wanted to see how accurately this worked.

This video shows the basic setup process we used before testing:

We tested these analytics on multiple cameras in a busy outdoor scene, to answer these questions: 

  • Are cars, trucks, people, and bikes reliably detected and classified?
  • What objects are missed most often?
  • How do busy scenes impact performance?
  • Are VMSes able to receive these events distinctly?

************* ******** **** ******* *** ******* ** **** ** ***** vs ******. **** ** *** *** ******* *** ***** **** Bosch ** ***** ****** *** ********* (*.** *******). 

** *********** ***** *** ****. **** **** *** *******, ** ****** ** *** *** accurately **** ******.

**** ***** ***** *** ***** ***** ******* ** **** ****** testing:

** ****** ***** ********* ** ******** ******* ** * **** outdoor *****, ** ****** ***** *********: 

  • *** ****, ******, ******, *** ***** ******** ******** *** **********?
  • **** ******* *** ****** **** *****?
  • *** ** **** ****** ****** ***********?
  • *** ***** **** ** ******* ***** ****** **********?

[***************]

Key ******** 

*****'* *** ****** ************** *** **** ******** **** **** *** people. ** *** ******** ******, ********* *** ******* ************** ** these ******* ****** * ~***' ***** ** **** *** ********, ******* *** objects.

********* ** ****** *** **** ********, **** ******** **** ******* together ********** ** * *****, *** **** ******* ****** ********** as ****.

******** **** ********** ***** ********, **** ****** ******* **** ********* **  and **** **** ******** ** *****. ****** ******** **** ************ missed ** ********** ** ******* **** ** ******.

*** ******** *********** *** ****** **************, ********* ***** ** ******* multiple **********/******** *****, ** **** ** *** ** **** ****** for ****** *********. *********** *** ****, ** ***** ************ *** known, *** ******* ******** ** *** ****/******** ***********.

***** *** ****** ********** **** ******* ******** ****** *** ********* XProtect, **** ******** ***** ******** ********** (*.*., ****** ********* **. vehicle *********, ***.).

***************/******

**** ***** ***** ***** ****** ************** *********, *****'* *** ********* take * **** ****** ** ******** ** ****** *** ******** providers **** ********/******* *** *******, ***** **** ******* ***** ************ for **** ****.

*******, ***** ****** ** ******* ** ***********, *** ***** ***** these ********* *** ********, **** **** ******** ****** ********** ******* objects ** ***** *** ** *************. ************, ** ********* ******** expectations ** ****** **. ******** (**** **** *** ******), ** proper ********* ** ******** ********* *****.

Firmware ************

***** ************ ** *** *** ********* ******** ** ******** *.**, available *** **** ******* ** ******* ** *** ***** ****. Firmware ** ********* *** ******** **** *** ***** ******** *******.

VMS ***********

*** ******* ****** ******** ****** ** ******* ******** ****** *** each *** **** ******* ** *** ******. **** ** ***** in *** ***** ****, ****, **** ****, ******, *** ******* "Detect *** ******" ***** ***** **********.

 

********* ******** ******** ** ** ** ******** ***** ********* ****** from ***** *** *******, ****** **** ***** *** *** ****** from *** ****** *** **** ** ********** **********.

******** ******* ****** *** ***** *** *** ******* ***** ******** events, **** ***** ****** *********.

Calibration *******

*********** ******** ***** ** **** ***** *********, *******, ***/** ****** in *** ******'* ***** ** ****. ** ********* *********** ***** Google **** ************ *** ***** ********* *** ***** ** ** be ****** ********, ****** * *** **** ** ****** ************.

**** ******* ** ******** ** *** ***** *****:

Detection ***********

**** ****** ******** ** *** *****, ****, ******, *** ****** are ********** ********* >**% ** *** ****. *** *******, ****** flags *** **** *** ****** *** ** **** ********* ******** to *** ********** ******* ** **** *****:

********* *** ******** *** ******, **** **** ******** ******* ** the *****.

**** *** ****** **** ********* ********** ** *** ******** ** cases, ****** ***** *** **** ******* **** ******, ********* ** size (*****):

*******, **** * **** (******** ** *********) *** *******, ** was ********* ********** ** *** *****, **** ** *** *** seen ****:

Misclassification ******

*******, ****************** **** ****** *** *****, *** ** * ****** extent, ******.

******* ******* ** "******"

**** ********, ****************** **** ****** ** ******** ******* ******* ******** when ***** *** **** ******** ** *** *****, ********* ** a ****** ****** ****** ** *** ******. **** *** **** often *** ** * ***** ** **** ********* ** * truck, **** ****:

** *** ************* *******, *** *********** ******* **** *** ****** is ****** **** *****. *********, ***** **** ** **** ******* a ******* ** *******, ********** ** *** ****. *******, ** some **** *********** ************ (*.*., ******* ** ******* ***** ****** are **********, ****-**** *********, ***.), ********* ** *** ******** ******* is *********.

***** ******* ********* ** *****

***** **** *** **** ****** *********** ****** ****, **** *********** every ***** ****** **** ********* ** * **** ** *** camera ** *** ***** ** *******. 

*** *******, * ***** ******* **** * ********:

** ******* * ******:

**** ** **** ** ***** *****, *** ****** ** *******, in * ******* ******* ** ******* ****** * ****, ****** the ****** *** *** *****************.

*******, ** *** ***** ****, *********, * *** *** ********** as * ******* ** ****:

 

Cameras **** 

*** ******* **** **** *** **** ****:

  • ***** ***-*****: *.**.****
  • ***** ***-****: *.**.****

******* ******** ****** *.* *** *** **** *** *********.

Comments (14)

I'm curious how it would work with a different FOV. Two things I notice:

1) The camera seems relatively low, it looks like maybe 8-9' high. I would expect improved results from a higher vantage point with a little more downward tilt of the camera

2) The FOV seems exceptionally wide and you appear to be getting barrel distortion from the lens. Looks like a ~3mm lens. I'd suggest trying something no less than 4mm to get a flatter image and to keep the overall horizon line and geometry more squared up.

What was the logic in using this FOV? Was it more or less random in the sense you picked a "typical" scene, or did it conform to some recommendations from Bosch?

Are the analytics included with the camera purchase similar to the way Samsung bundles them in with the WiseNetIII. Overall they appear to work fairly well. It will be interesting to see how they perform over a longer period of time. I have had issues with "in camera" analytics where they just stop sending alerts and the camera needs to be rebooted.

They're included on all 7000/8000 series cameras at no charge (5MP starlight, 1080p HDR, 4K, etc.), but not on the 5000 series.

I think that Bosch is trying to do too much.

Avigilon approach of people/cars is much more reliable as I don't see any tech today that can really detect a the difference between a person and a bicycle.

Its better to do less in a good way than to do more poorly.

Finally, when a bike (bicicyle or motorbike) was present, it was correctly classified in all cases...

However, misclassifications were common for bikes...

Meaning other types were commonly misclassified as bikes, since no bikes were actually misclassified?

Ethan could you post some video clips from the intersection shot showing objects being detected? Also could you show images/video of the calibration setup for the intersection?

Just following up with the request for some video clips from the street shots.

I would really like to know detection ranges in day and night scenarios, with the lens length or angle used. That to me are the most important numbers along with reliability. Getting an idea of reliable ranges gives you an idea of how many cameras are needed for coverage.

In this test we were trying to get an idea of how well classification worked, not intending this to be a redo of their IVA detection performance. We tested that here (and in the rain). That being said, in this scene, I'd say detection of humans was reliable out to about 150' using the Bosch 5MP, or about a 285' HFOV, something like this:

I know I asked already asked but could you please post some video so we can see the detection range.

The issue with video clips here is that Bosch doesn't embed bounding boxes in the video (like Avigilon no longer does), and to my knowledge, no one has integrated the bounding boxes via metadata other than their own VMS, which we don't use. So we can see them live using Configuration Manager, but Genetec (which fully integrates the separate rules, sans bounding boxes) doesn't display the box.

So I can show you clips and you can see what is in the scene, but it's not going to show you bounding boxes. It's not going to show you events as they happen, either. Video associated with each event can be exported, but multiple events can't be exported with one stretch of video.

I will look through what we have saved as far as config/screen captures of Configuration Manager, as that's the only thing that'll show bounding boxes and path.

The cameras tested here don't support The Bosch CPP6 platform on which this IVA version is supported, therefore tests are i"not really relevant. Re-test on the Starlight 8000 and would be interesting to see results.

1. We used a Starlight 8000, the NBN-80052, as we mentioned in the report. The images in the report are taken from that camera.

2. As per Bosch's documentation IVA 6.10 is supported on more than CPP6.

IP cameras from Bosch are grouped by their common
product platform (CPP) generation. IVA 6.10 is
available on CPP4 and CPP6 based IP cameras

The NBN-932 (now numbered NBN-71027) is CPP4, and supported.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Video Analytics

Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...
Axis Guard Suite Video Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2018
In 2015, we declared Axis' Guard Suite analytics "weak", with missed detections and false alerts common. But after nearly 3 years and a 2.0 version...
Huawei Software Defined Cameras on Jun 25, 2018
Huawei is aiming to break the reputation of Chinese companies not being good at software. The company is now leading their video surveillance...
IFSEC 2018 Final Show Report on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM attended the IFSEC show for the first time this year. The Chinese took over the show, centered on Hikvision, flanked by Dahua, Huawei and a...
ReconaSense - The AI / Access Control / Analytics / IoT / Video Company Profile on Jun 12, 2018
One company's ISC West booth stood out for displaying a light-up tower of buzzwords. The company, ReconaSense, pledged to be 'making sense of it...
Bosch IVA Video Analytics And Motion+ VMD Tested on Jun 06, 2018
Bosch's video analytics now ship on nearly every model, from indoor domes to high-end 5MP starlight cameras.  In this test, we evaluate Bosch's...
Hanwha Wisenet X Analytics and VMD Test on May 24, 2018
Continuing our updated testing of camera analytics, we tested Hanwha's Wisenet X analytics for over two weeks in multiple scenes, indoors and out,...
The Hikvision Smart Classroom Behavior Management System on May 22, 2018
Hikvision's rapidly growing offering of analytics, which we most recently examined with Hikvision's ethnic minority analytics, is now going into...
Dahua Intrusion Analytics And VMD Tested (Poorly) on May 21, 2018
Dahua ships basic analytics on practically all their cameras, ranging from low cost to high end. To see how these analytics work in real world...

Most Recent Industry Reports

AI Startup Anyvision Raises $28 Million Led By Bosch on Jul 20, 2018
Anyvision is the most ambitious heavy-spending video surveillance startup in many years. And, now, the startup has raised $28 million led by...
Fail: Dahua "Didn't Check The Lux Levels but It Was Dark" on Jul 20, 2018
Dahua UK has been promoting their camera quality on LinkedIn: I, and others, asked what the lux level of the scene was. (background: Lux Rating...
Free 100+ Manufacturer-Customized Camera Calculator Released on Jul 19, 2018
Now, any manufacturer has a customized IPVM Camera Calculator, free. The goal is to make it easier for companies to help their customers better...
Improved Security And Surveillance Bidding - 2018 MasterFormat Divisions Examined) on Jul 19, 2018
Navigating the world of system specifications and bidding work can be complex and confusing, but a standard format exists, and understanding it...
Last Chance - Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 19, 2018
Today is the last day to register. Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security...
Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Ladder Lockdown and Ladder Levelizer Tested on Jul 18, 2018
Ladders are a daily necessity for surveillance and security installers, but working on an unstable surface can be extremely dangerous. In addition...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact