Beware Imager vs Stream Resolution

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Sep 10, 2015

Typically, a camera's sensor resolution and stream resolution are the same. So a camera with a 3MP imager supports a 3MP stream max.

However, sometimes the actual stream resolution supported is significantly less than the imager resolution. Worse, some manufacturers try to obscure this to make their cameras look higher resolution, causing confusion and disappointment for users.

Panoramic cameras are the most common example of this problem. In this note, we explain the differences and the risks involved.

*********, * ******'* ****** resolution *** ****** ********** are *** ****. ** a ****** **** * 3MP ****** ******** * 3MP ****** ***.

*******, ********* *** ****** stream ********** ********* ** significantly **** **** *** imager **********. *****, **** manufacturers *** ** ******* this ** **** ***** cameras **** ****** **********, causing ********* *** ************** for *****.

********* ******* *** *** most ****** ******* ** this *******. ** **** note, ** ******* *** differences *** *** ***** involved.

[***************]

Imager ********** ** ********* **********

***** ******* ******* ******* round (** **********) ****** of ****, *** ****** image ******* *** ***********, ***** is *********** ***** ** the ***** ***** ******, ****** black. **** ** ********* on *** **** *** right, ***** *****, *** sometimes *** *** ****** as ****.

***** *** ***** ** view **** *** ***** the ****** ***** ** the ******, *** ********* PPF **** ** ********** based **** ** *** actual ***** ** *** FOV, *** *** *** resolution. [**** ***************'* *********** ************* ** ********** ***** of ****, ***** ***** more ** *** *********** imager, *** ***** ** still ***** ***** **** to *** ***** ** the ***.]

**** ************* **** *** camera's ***** ** * square ****** ***** ** eliminate *** ****** ***** space **** *****. *** example, * *** ****** (2592x1920) *** ** ******* to *********, ** ** the ***** *****:

Manufacturer ********

***** *** ******* ******** of ************* ********* ******* using ***** ****** **********, instead ** ********* **********:

*** ***** *** **** *** do ** *****, ** well.

**********, ******* ** ***** issues, *** ******* ** may ** ********* ** determine *** ********** * given ****** ** *********, best ******** ** ** test **** ****** ********* camera ** *****. ** this ** *** ********, those **** ******, ***-******** aspect ****** *** ********* more *********** **** ***** specifying *** **** ****** resolution. 

Comments (10)

Thank you Ethan for pointing this topic!

Question: are there panoramic cameras with, for example, 5MP sensor (quite typicall now), but with only 2MP stream (panoramic or de-warped soft PTZ)?

The Axis M3007 comes to mind. It uses a 5MP sensor, but aside from the fisheye overview stream (5MP) it outputs much lower resolutions. For example, the dual panorama and PTZ view areas are both 1920x1440 max resolution, about 2.7MP. There are other examples but that one I know off the top of my head.

The main argument for this is that these streams are removing unnecessary regions from the image (like the black around the spherical view) or looking at only a portion of it, and that's why they are lower resolution. But it is still often deceptive and can be difficult to calculate.

There are other examples...

Same deal noted here after the test of Panasonic panoramic, yes?

  • This size of the camera's sensor is 12 MP.
  • The fisheye lens forms an image circle of 9 MP.
  • The images in the test are 5 MP.

Camera from your example is fair - it is still delivering sensor pixel-2-pixel. And other streams really do not need full resolution.

Any ideas about cameras where original imager(s) is/are completely obscured? Scallop maybe?

I have a mix of the geovision FE and Vivotek FE cameras, and have verified the above statement. I battled this on install but gave up on it...so I have to wonder if these 5mp FE cams are only putting out 3mp, if you buy the 3mp fe, will the image be scaled again or will it be 3mp.

Heres a snapshot of Geovision software stating the actual size of 1920*1920, the camera is a vivotek being ran on the geovision platform.

Some manufacturers crop the camera's image to a square aspect ratio to eliminate the wasted black space seen above. For example, a 5MP camera (2592x1920) may be cropped to 1920x1920.

1920x1920 = 3.7MP

And even that number is deceiving, the effective pixels are actually more like 2.9MP.

Ethan, do any of these new panoramics have lens options that might change the image circle, and therefore the amount of wasted pixels? I think I have a Mobotix that does, but it's old.

Off-topic, but I have to ask, what is all the debris and downed signage in the middle of the street? Was there an accident or a wind storm?

The intersection where we were shooting is pretty infamous here. The road to the right leads to what was supposed to be a shopping center but it was never built. There are parking lots and much of the site is paved, but no buildings. The debris is the road closed sign which was already on the ground when we got there, and broken sandbags which were holding it. Fun fact: this was the only site I was ever asked to leave by the police. The site is private property but we were on the sidewalk which is public. He asked me to go anyway.

The site is private property but we were on the sidewalk which is public. He asked me to go anyway.

The trunk being open gives the impression you were ready to high tail it out of there if necessary. ;)

I think this may be one of the worst offenders, the Dahua "12MP" fisheye.

Not only is it marketed as 12MP, the spec sheet lists the resolution as 4000x3000. Effective pixels.

The other ones don't seem to actually state a bogus stream resolution as well.

I don't know how many it does use, but it's not possible to have a fisheye with a resolution as high as the sensor unless the sensor is round, or you are including dark pixels, right?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Panoramic

Budget Covert Cameras Tested on Nov 26, 2019
Covert cameras under $100 are widely available online but are they any good? To see how these models really work in the real world, we bought...
Avigilon 32MP and 12MP H4 Multisensor Cameras Tested on Jun 11, 2019
Avigilon has released their H4 Multi-Sensor line of cameras claiming "broad scene coverage and high image detail" We bought and tested the...
Vivotek 20MP Multi-Imager Tested on May 30, 2019
Vivotek has released their latest repositionable multi-imager camera, the MA9321-EHTV, a 20 MP model claiming "Supreme Night Visibility", "Optimal...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...
Axis Bad Marketing - Panoramic Commercial on Nov 23, 2018
Axis is bad at marketing. Recall last month - Axis: "No One Wants To Buy A Camera" and, more generally their 2018 production introductions. But...
Hikvision PanoVu Mini Tested (Multi-imager + PTZ For ~$500) on Aug 07, 2018
Hikvision has released their first PanoVu Mini multi imager, the PanoVu DS-2PT3326IZ-DE3, with four 1080p imagers, including a PTZ and integrated...
Panasonic 9MP Panoramic Fisheye Tested (WV-X4571L) on Aug 02, 2018
Panasonic has released their latest fisheye camera, the WV-X4571L, with 12MP sensor and 9MP resolution, claiming "extreme image quality" under...
Panoramic Fisheye Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek on Jun 27, 2018
IPVM tested Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek 12MP panoramic fisheye cameras head to head, as shown in the test setup...
Dahua 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (NK8BR4) on May 16, 2018
Continuing our coverage of 12MP sensor fisheye cameras, we bought and tested the Dahua NK8BR4, examining: Default vs. Optimized...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Disruptor Wyze Releases Undisruptive Smartlock on Dec 06, 2019
While Wyze has disrupted the consumer IP camera market with ~$20 cameras, its entrance into smart locks is entirely undisruptive. We have...
Bosch Budget 3000i Cameras Tested on Dec 05, 2019
Bosch has long had a hole in its lineup for, as it describes, "competitively-priced cameras". Now, Bosch has released its 3000i series cameras...
Anixter Resisting Takeover From Competitor on Dec 05, 2019
Mega distributor Anixter is going to be acquired but by whom? Initially, Anixter planned to go private, being bought by a private equity firm....
Security Sales Course 2020 - Last Chance Save $50 on Dec 05, 2019
This sales course is customized for the current needs and challenges specific to professionals selling video surveillance and access control...
Ireland National Children's Hospital Chooses Hikvision End-to-End With Facial Recognition on Dec 05, 2019
The world's most expensive hospital project ever, the New Children's Hospital in Ireland, has chosen an all-Hikvision surveillance system including...
AVTech ~$70 IP Cameras Tested Vs Dahua and Hikvision on Dec 04, 2019
Taiwanese manufacturer Avtech is taking direct aim at low cost leaders Dahua and Hikvision with ~$70 starlight and white light illuminator...
Ultinous European Analytics Startup Company Profile on Dec 04, 2019
European analytics-startup Ultinous pitches customers to "Have your own video analysis service!" We spoke to Ultinous to better understand their...
Access Startup Multi-Mount Aims To Streamline Reader Installs on Dec 03, 2019
Startup Multi-Mount claims it makes installing access readers 'Fast', 'Secure,' and fit 'any size frame.' The company states its bracket 'fits most...
Resideo CEO To Step Down on Dec 03, 2019
Resideo's CEO, Mike Nefkins, is stepping down, just 18 months after being brought in to lead the now plagued spin-out. Inside this note, we...
Arcules CEO Retracts False GDPR Claim + Dahua and Milestone Claims Examined on Dec 03, 2019
Arcules CEO has retracted a false claim about his organization being a "fully compliant GDPR company" after IPVM reporting (Arcules CEO Threatens...