Reducing Bandwidth Through Privacy Masks?

By: John Honovich, Published on Apr 23, 2012

Reducing your surveillance bandwidth means lower storage costs and better remote monitoring. As such, professionals are always looking for techniques to do so, including improved codecs (MPEG-4 to H.264, H.264 Baseline to High Profile), VBR vs CBR modes, etc.

Rarely though do people look at using privacy masks for reducing bandwidth. Instead, privacy masks are typically used to prevent operators from seeing inside other people's homes and offices. Guidelines for using privacy masks, like this one from the UK government [link no longer available], focus on blocking surveillance from looking where it should not. The image below demonstrates a typical use of privacy masks to block out windows:

[link no longer available]

However, what if those privacy masks could be used to reduce bandwidth? In this test report, we try out privacy masks from Axis, Bosch, Panasonic and Sony to see if they could deliver savings. We apply masks and track bandwidth utilization before and after plus review the masking capabilities of each manufacturer.

[UPDATED 4/26/12: Based on user requests, we've added in test results for Arecont]

Key Findings

Some manufacturers, but not all, can significantly reduce bandwidth by using privacy masks:

  • Axis reduced bandwidth significantly through the use of up to 3 mask zones
  • Bosch reduced bandwidth significantly through the use of up to 4 mask zones
  • Panasonic did NOT reduce bandwidth despite having 2 mask zones
  • Sony is CBR only and will not reduce banwidth regardless of masking
  • Arecont reduced bandwidth through fully customizable though combersome privacy mask zones

Using privacy masks is definitely a promising technique to significantly reduce bandwidth. However, you should do tests on each manufacturer you plan to use to see if it makes a difference. The tests can be done in a few minutes: (1) measure bandwidth with no mask, (2) apply masks, (3) re-measure bandwidth with the masks now activated. If you see a noticeable drop, you are good to do.

Axis: The comparison below shows that applying 3 masks dropped the bite rate by ~60%. Obviously, the amount of bandwidth reduction will depend on the size of the masks but clearly this has a positive impact.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Bosch: In the Bosch comparison below, we see a significant drop as well. Note, we adjuted the encoder / stream settings to allow the Bosch to act more like a VBR camera (see our explanation in the VBR vs CBR post). In general, we recommend this for Bosch cameras, with or without privacy masks.

Panasonic: Interestingly, Panasonic's privacy masks made no difference on bandwidth consumption. See below:

We tried Panasonic is a harder scene to see if that would deliver bandwidth savings. However, bandwidth remained about the same in this scene as well, as shown below:

Our assumption is that Panasonic first encodes the whole video, then overlays an image/mask, resulting in no bandwidth savings.

Note that we used Panasonic's recommended 'Frame Rate' mode which is a constrained VBR implementation. Panasonic says that this mode will allow "The bit rate [to] be controlled between +- 50% of selected Max bit rate." We used the default max bit rate of 4Mb/s for this camera. As the results above show, the bit rate did vary between the two scenes but not between the mask on vs mask off attempts.

Arecont Vision: Arecont Vision's privacy masking reduced bandwidth consumption:

Configuration

Each camera had important differences in configuring privacy masks.

The Axis supported a maximum of 3 masks. Each mask needed to be applied / controlled individually, making it moderately cumbersome to setup.

Bosch had the best configuration options of the cameras tested. Not only did they support 4 masks, it was simple to position the masks and activate them.

Panasonic had the worst and most limited setup of the cameras tested. It only supported two masks and it was very difficult to position them as the mask edges did not support dragging / adjustment.

While Sony's use of CBR streaming prevents privacy masks from having an impact on bandwidth, it did offer 8 privacy zones - the most of any camera we tested - as shown below:

Finally, Arecont's privacy mask setup was the most fascinating with the most flexible number of zones yet the most cumbersome means to set up. Each tiny grid could be set up as its own individual mask. However, selecting grids was extremely challenging as visual feedback of selection is delayed by a number of selections. As such, it is hard to know what was selected. See below for an overview:

1 report cite this report:

IP Camera Bandwidth Training on May 27, 2012
Understanding bandwidth is critical to using IP cameras. In this new training, we show how to measure bandwidth and how significantly bandwidth can...
Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Leica Launches LIDAR / Thermal / IP Camera on Mar 04, 2020
Swiss manufacturer Leica is launching what it calls a "real-time reality capture device" fusing LIDAR, thermal cameras, IP cameras and more. In...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new IPVM test results show cause major problems for facial recognition...
AI/Smart Camera Tutorial on Feb 20, 2020
Cameras with video analytics, sometimes called 'Smart' camera or 'AI' cameras, etc. are one of the most promising growth areas of video...
Glossary / Acronyms for Video Surveillance on Feb 10, 2020
This directory provides definitions and explanations for over 70 common video surveillance industry terms, including links to related IPVM...
Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
UK Facial Recognition Essex Errors Report on Jul 05, 2019
Facial recognition trials in the UK have generated significant controversy and debate over the past few years. This week, it flared again when Sky...
FLIR Saros Visible / Thermal Analytic Camera Tested on Jun 26, 2019
FLIR's Saros claims "accurate, actionable alerts" with a combination of 1080p visible and dual thermal sensors along with IR and white light...
Axis Live Privacy Shield Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2019
Privacy is becoming a bigger factor in video surveillance, driven both by increased public awareness and by GDPR. Now, Axis has released Live...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Genetec Drops Support for Dahua and Hikvision on Jun 01, 2020
Genetec has dropped support for Dahua and Hikvision, citing US blacklisting and ONVIF conformance blockage, the company informed partners in an...
Dotty "Hot Or Not" Elevated Body Temperature App Tested on Jun 01, 2020
What if you could take an existing phone or tablet and transform it into "fever camera"? That is what DottyAR is doing with their strangely named...
Optris "Fever Screening Systems" Examined on Jun 01, 2020
German manufacturer Optris has been building temperature measuring instruments for industrial manufacturing for over 15 years, and thermal cameras...
Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how much are integrators selling them? 220 integrators answered the...
"Fever Camera" Show Starts Tomorrow on May 31, 2020
IPVM is excited for the world's first "Fever Camera" show, to be held this Tuesday, June 2nd and Wednesday the 3rd from 11am to 3pm EDT, giving you...
Proxy Presents Mobile Credentials For BLE Devices and Access on May 29, 2020
Proxy presented Mobile Credentials For BLE Devices and Access at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...
ISC West 2020 Moves To The Basement on May 29, 2020
The twice cancelled/postponed show will now not only be held in a different month (October) but on a different floor, moving down to the...
Integrators Avoiding Coronavirus Air Travel on May 29, 2020
IPVM asked integrators if air travel is part of their 2020 plans to see how significantly Coronavirus will impact future...
Viakoo Presents Cyber Hygiene for Cameras on May 28, 2020
Viakoo presented its 'Cyber Hygiene' and 'Service Assurance' products at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A...
Seek Scan Thermal Temperature Screening System ReTested on May 28, 2020
Now that IPVM has tested Dahua, Hikvision, and Sunell, we are returning to Seek, the first blackbody system we tested and retested it with our...