Sexual Assault at School, Faulty Cameras Cited

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Nov 27, 2013

After a female student was carried to an empty room and sexually assaulted, a local TV station reported that the cameras were not working [link no longer available] during the time of the incident. A Kansas City Public Schools spokesman later confirmed the cameras were broken and that they were not fixed until the day after the incident.

In this note, we share our findings from speaking with the school and the integrator about what happened with the cameras and how they impacted this case.

The System and Its Role

The system costed nearly $1 million and includes Panasonic cameras and SmartVue NVRs.

Contrary to what the news story implies, there were no cameras positioned in places that would have provided much information to the case, according to the integrator. However, we could not verify this.

Here is the video from the story [link no longer available]:

Problems with the System

The problems with the district’s camera systems were usually easy fixes, according to Robert Harper, president of 
ACS Electronic Systems, but sometimes took weeks to coordinate repairs. 

For example, a power outage knocked out 13 cameras at a one high school and they only needed to be reset. At another high school a construction project damaged a server and cabling. At another school a camera and server went missing after a construction project. 

“I don’t think any of these are necessarily unusual items for a dealer. The difference is that [Kansas City Public Schools] is hard to deal with,” Harper said.

The problem at Southwest Early College Campus, the school where the sexual assault happened, was caused by the district’s own IT department, according to the integrator.  

After a network switch went out, ACS reset the switch.

Emails between the school’s security staff and ACS show the school contacted the integrator on August 16th and again on August 19th when the cameras went out again. On the 22nd, ACS went to the school, but no one with a key to the server room was available to let them reset the switch or troubleshoot the problem (IT has a key to the room, but only security, who doesn’t have a key, is there after hours).

The school’s security director says he couldn’t get a hold of ACS again for days. ACS finally confirmed and appointment for August 30th. The following is an email sent to ACS one day before the sexual assault:

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

When ACS finally did get in to the closet, they found that IT department had changed the "port addresses." The cameras were functioning, but the data wasn’t going where it was supposed to be.

Bad Communication Between School and Integrator

ACS is under contract to be on call for any service requests in the district, but also works with 40 other school districts or campuses in the Kansas City area.

An initial look at the documents released by the school district seems to show the company was generally unresponsive. Emails released in response to a public records request from KSHB show ACS Electronic Systems, the company responsible for maintenance of the system sometimes would not respond to requests for weeks.

However, ACS says the emails don't necessarily show the whole story and that miscommunication came from lack of organization on the part of the district, which had 14 people in several different departments communicating with ACS about maintenance requests. 

The school doesn't deny that. With too many people who could send a request to ACS it was hard for the integrator to prioritize requests, and there were several people contacting him from several different schools, the district spokesman admitted.

“We had been having difficulties leading up to the assault and unfortunately that happened and it pushed us to act more quickly,” the district spokesman said. “We knew the cameras weren’t working a week or two ahead of time. We were working with ACS, we just couldn’t get it tidied up fast enough.” 

The integrator says they were calling the school back, but even with those returned calls they would make little progress. “We were originally told more than once that the security director had to approve any service requests. We would get an email from one of the 14 people and we would pick up the phone and call the person who was supposed to approve it, the security director,” he said. “The security director would pick up the phone and say ‘Let me check on that’ and we would wait. And then we would get another email from the person and we’d call again and the director would say ‘Oh, I’m still working on that.’ If we don’t get approved by the security director for the work, then we don’t get paid.”

Communication Plan Established

The school district and ACS had a meeting where both sides agreed to do more to facilitate communication. The district has designated three people who would be authorized contact ACS for maintenance requests. ACS designated a single person to be the point of contact for the school.

They also came up with a triage system to prioritize requests and mandate response times. A new agreement between Kansas City Public Schools says requests for critical repairs must be responded to within 24 hours, critical but non life-threatening repairs must have a response within three days and for non-critical repairs they will work out a mutually beneficial time to get them fixed.

The district plans to create an in-house position for someone who can take care of the surveillance systems too. And now ACS says it follows every verbal communication with an email. He said the school has repeatedly declined a $25 per month system health monitoring service. 

Contract Renewal

The district’s contract is up for renewal in December. The school declined to say what the new contract would look like because it is still being worked out, but said it would likely include some changes to maintenance procedures. 

IPVM Recommendations

While IPVM can not determine the specific issues in this case, some clear principles are illustrated:

Most importantly, larger end users should ensure they have a clear internal reporting structure with one, or at most a few central individuals, reporting and managing issues with an integrator. By contrast, having lots of people report problems individually can cause problems. 

A maintenance plan that covered all service in an annual fee rather than having to approve every issue piecemeal (as it occurred here) would have radically simplified the maintenance process as it eliminates the need of customer approval to ensure payment. See our Service / Maintenance Contracts Guide

Integrators need access to both user facilities and restricted resources (like rooms and networking equipment). This can be difficult to coordinate and is easy source of strife (e.g., each party blaming each other).

Members, what else would you recommend to do to minimize this type of problem?

1 report cite this report:

Bad Marketing Beware - Intransa is Back! on Mar 13, 2015
After burning $100+ million on a mythical 'secret sauce', quietly going out...
Comments (16) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

London Live Police Face Recognition Visited on Feb 13, 2020
London police have officially begun using live facial recognition in select...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020,...
ADI Branch Burglary on Apr 03, 2020
A security systems distributor branch is an odd target for burglary but that...
China Manufacturer Suffers Coronavirus Scare on Feb 20, 2020
Uniview suffered a significant health scare last week after one of its...
Resideo AlarmNet Has Major Outage on Mar 12, 2020
AlarmNet suffered a major outage yesterday, impacting Total Connect, Resideo,...
Sunell Panda Cam Body Temperature Measurement Camera Tested on May 14, 2020
Sunell is far less well known than its gargantuan domestic competitors Dahua...
Camio Presents Coronavirus Social Distancing Analytics on Apr 20, 2020
Camio presented its social distancing analytics for responding to coronavirus...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new...
Faked Coronavirus Fever Detection, Athena Used Hikvision; Responds - Selling NDAA Compliant Cameras, Pledging 50% Of Profits to Victims on Mar 24, 2020
US company, Athena Security, faked its coronavirus fever detection marketing,...
Clinton Public View Monitor (PVM) Mask Detection Tested on Jul 09, 2020
Face mask detection, or more specifically not wearing one, is expanding...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of...
IFSEC And The Security Event Both Postponed To September Due to Coronavirus on Mar 10, 2020
IFSEC, the UK's largest security show and held in London, has been delayed to...
Cisco Video Surveillance Is Dead, Long Live Cisco Meraki Video Surveillance on Feb 11, 2020
A dozen years ago much of the industry thought that Cisco was destined to...
Avigilon Face Mask Detection Tested on Jun 24, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically not wearing a face mask, is an...
Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London...

Recent Reports

SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 200 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...
US Startup Fever Inspect Examined on Aug 03, 2020
Undoubtedly late to fever cameras, this US company, Fever Inspect, led by a...
Motorola Solutions Acquires Pelco on Aug 03, 2020
Motorola Solutions has acquired Pelco, pledging to bring blue back and make...
False: Verkada: "If You Want To Remote View Your Cameras You Need To Punch Holes In Your Firewall" on Jul 31, 2020
Verkada falsely declared to “3,000+ customers”, “300 school districts”, and...
US GSA Explains NDAA 889 Part B Blacklisting on Jul 31, 2020
With the 'Blacklist Clause' going into effect August 13 that bans the US...
Access Control Online Show July 2020 - On-Demand Recording of 45+ Manufacturers Presentations on Jul 30, 2020
The show featured 48 Access Control presentations, all now recorded and...
Face Detection Shootout - Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jul 30, 2020
Face detection analytics are available from a number of manufactures...
Sunell is The First China Manufacturer to Market NDAA Compliance on Jul 30, 2020
Most China manufacturers are going to be impacted by the NDAA 'Blacklist...