Axis Zipstream Claims Average 50% Savings

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Mar 25, 2015

Axis claims that its new Zipstream compression technology can "lower bandwidth and storage requirements by an average 50% or more."

That is quite an audacious claim for such a fundamental element of video surveillance systems.

In this note, we explain how Zipstream works and how it matches up against other bandwidth 'saving' technologies and rival products:

  • Dynamic Scene Compression - How It Works
  • Dynamic I Frame Interval - What It Does
  • Axis Best and Worst Case Zipstream Scenarios
  • Axis Availability Restrictions
  • Zipstream vs H.265
  • Zipstream vs Vivotek Smart Stream and Arecont Bandwidth Savings Mode
  • Zipstream vs Ambarella
  • Zipstream vs Dahua and Hikvision
  • Zipstream Marketing Impact

************** *** *** ********* *********** ********** *** "***** ********* *** storage ************ ** ** ******* **% ** ****."

**** ** ***** ** ********* ***** *** **** * *********** element ** ***** ************ *******.

** **** ****, ** ******* *** ********* ***** *** *** it ******* ** ******* ***** ********* '******' ************ *** ***** products:

  • ******* ***** *********** - *** ** *****
  • ******* * ***** ******** - **** ** ****
  • **** **** *** ***** **** ********* *********
  • **** ************ ************
  • ********* ** *.***
  • ********* ** ******* ***** ****** *** ******* ********* ******* ****
  • ********* ** *********
  • ********* ** ***** *** *********
  • ********* ********* ******

[***************]

**********: **** ********* ***** ******* *** **** ********* **********

Bandwidth ********** ****

********* **********, **** ****** ******* **** *** **** ************ **** the **** *****, **********, ***** **** *** *********** *** ** huge. **** ** ********* ** ********** *** ********** *** ********** or *** ********* **** **.

*** ***** ***** ***** *** **** *******, *** ***** *** M3004, **** *** ** ****, ** ***, ************ ** ~**, across * **' ********** ***. ******* ***** ******* ***** ************, the *****'* ******* *** *** **/* ***** *** ***** *** *.** Mb/s, ****** ** *** *********.

************, ******* **** ** *********, ********, *** ***********, ***., ****** differing ****** ** ******* ** ********* ******, ** ** **** in *********** ****** ********* **** *******. *** ** ***** **********, ********** *** **** ******* ********* will ******* ** *** ***** ********** ** **** **********.

Dynamic ***** *********** - *** ** *****

*** *.*** ** **********, *** *** ****** ** *********** ** controlled ** *** *********** / ************ *****. ** **** *******, this ** * ***** **** * (***** ***********) ** *** (most ***********). **** **** ** *.*** ************ ****** ** * to ** (*** **********, *** *** ***** ******* / *********** ********).

********, * ****** *********** ***** ** ******* ** ** ****** video ******. *** *******, * ******* **** ****** *** * compression ***** ** **. *** ***** ***** - ******* ** is * ***** **** ** * ******'* **** *** *** same *********** *****.

*** ***** ** *** *** *** ********* ********, ******* *** ******* compression / ************ ****** ***** **** ***** *******. ****** ******* such ** ****** ** ******** *** **** * ************ ***** of ** *******, ***** *** ********** ** *** ***** **** as ***** *** ******** *** **** **********, *.*., * ************ of **. 

*** ******* ** ***** ********* *********** ****** *** ********* ***** of * ****** ** **** '****' *** '******' ** ******* portions. *** *******, *** ********* **** *** *********** ** * face *** **** *********** ** * ***** ***** **** ** typically **** *** ***** ********* / *******.

*** *** ***** **** **** ********* ** *** ******** *** technology ** ** ******** **** ***** ** *** ***** *** be ******* * **** *********** ******* ****** ********** *******.

Dynamic I ***** Interval - **** ** ****

** ******** ** ********* *********** ***** ** ***** ********, ********* also ******* * ***** ********. *** *******, ** * ***** scene **** ** ******, ** * ***** *** **** ** **** every * ******* ** ****, ***** ** ***** ******* **** occurred ** *** *****. **** ******* ****** *** ***** *** walks *******, *******, *** ****** ******* *** ******** ** * shorter ********, ******* ** * ***** ** **** **** ******. 

**** ******* ** **** *** ********* * "*** *** ****** ************* **** ****** *** **** *** ******* GOP *** **." **** ******** * ***** ** ****** **** very **** * ***** ********* ** *** ***** ******** *** VMS ******* **** ****** ** ******* * ***** ********* *** search *** ********.

Axis **** *** ***** **** ********* *********

** ****' ********* **********, **** *** ***** ****** *** ******** across ********* ******:

*** ************** ** ****:

  • ******** ****, **** *** ****** ***** *****, *** **** ** compress **** **** ******* ******** ******* ****, ******* **** ******* lots ** ******* **** ** ******* *** ****** ******* *******.
  • ***** ****, **** *** ******* *** *****, *** ****** ** compress **** ******* *********** ******* ****, ******* *** ******* *** relatively ***** / **********.
  • ***** **** ********* ** *** **** ****** ** ***** ********* due ** *********** ***** *********, *** *********, ****** *** ******* savings *********. *******, ***: ******* ********* ** *** ***** *** ******: ******** ********* ** ***** ** ****.

Axis ************ ************

****** **** ** ****' ******** ******* **** ******* *********, ******** restraining *** ********* ** *** ***** ****.

********* ** ******* ** **** ******* *************-*, ***** ** ****' ****** ******** ****. *** **** ******** cameras **** *** ** ******** ** ********* *** **** *****, **** ***** *** *** **** *** ******. *******, Axis ** ********* * **** ** *** ** ***** ***, of ******, ********* ******** *** ******.

******** ** ******* ******** ******* **** *** ********* *********** ** scheduled *** ******* ** ***** *, ****. ** **** ** test *** ***** **** **** ** ****. 

Zipstream ** *.***

** *** **** ****** *** *.*** *** ** *** ****** Axis ** ***** ** **** ****. ** **** ***, ********* could *** ** ************ ******* ******* ****** ******* *** *.***, which ** ******* ********* *** **** ****** ********** ********** ****.

**** **** *.*** *** ********* ***** ** '** ** ** savings', **** ******* ** **** ***** **** *.***. ** **** end, ** ********** *** **** ******** *****, '*** ****** ** a *** ***** ***** ***** *** ******* *** ********** ***** of ****** ******** *** ***, **** *** *** **** **** the ***** *** ****/***** *** * ****** ***** - *.***.'

Zipstream ** ******* ***** ****** *** ******* ********* ******* ****

********* ****** **** ************ ***********'* ***** ******, ** **** *********** ****** *********** ** ******* ** *** scene ** ****** *********. ** *** **** ** ***** ******, reductions ** **-**% ** **** *** ****** *** ** ** 50% ** *** *****, **** ***** ** ****' **% *** 90% *********** ** ***** ******. ************, ** *** ******* ****** tested, ******* ********* *********** ******* ***** ****** *** *** ****** than *******, ** ***** ***** ********** **** ******, ********* ******** fairly ****.

*******'* ********* ******* ****, ******* ******* ********* *******, **** *** ****** *********** ** *** as ********* ****, *** ******* ******* **** ******* **** *** scene, ********* ********* *** ******** *** ****** ** ****** *********. We ***** ********* ******* **** **% ** **% ********* ** the *****, *** ******** ***** ******* ****** *** ** **** mode. 

Zipstream ** *********

********* ** *** ******* ******* **** ******** *** ****-*** ** ******* and ***** ***** (**** *** ** *** *********** ** *.***) ******* ***** ********* *********** / ******* *** ******* ***** them. *********’* ***** ******* ************* **** **** “********” **** ****** ****** bitrate ***** *********, **** **** ***** ** ** ** *** as *** - *** **** *** **** ** *****. ********* customers, ** ******, **** ********* ***** *** ***** ********.

*** ********* *********, ***** *** *******, *** **** **** ** our **** ** ****** ********* / ******* ********. ** **** ** **** **** ********* ******* **** *******.

Zipstream ** ***** *** *********

******* ***** ** ********* ****** *** ******* ********* *******. ** that ***, **** *** ** **** ** ******** ********* ** a ****** ** *** * ******* *** ***** *******, ********** the ***** *** / ******** ** **** ******** ** ***** biggest ******* ***********.

Zipstream ********* ******

*** **** ** **** *** ************ ************, ***** ***** **** and ******* *******, **** *** *** ******** ******* ** **** the ****** **** ***** *********** (*.*., ***** *** ***********). ** that ***, ** ***** **** ********* ***** **** ****** ** launch ***** *** *********** ************* / ********* *********. *** ** the *******, ** *********** *** *** *** ***** ** ****** after *******, ***** ******* **** * ********** *********** *********.

**********, ******, * *********** ******* ** *********'* ****** **** ** based ** *** **** ** *** ****** ******** ********* ******* sacrificing *******. ** ****** ** **** *** **** ***** **** new ******** ** ******** ** ***** ****.

Comments (22)

Hi Ethan, thank you for a very interesting report. I will be very interested in reading IPVM's test report of bandwidth savings and image quality when the Axis Zipstream feature is released.

I wonder what would happen if Axis used their Zipstream feature in combination with H.265 compression? I'm a little surprised they aren't implementing both technologies now rather than waiting another year to support H.265. It would have put Axis in a better competitive position with Dahua who have recently started to trickle out H.265 devices. It will be interesting to see how the technologies compare as these two companies roll out their new products.

Axis has already stated that Zipstream can be used with H.265. The real question is when Axis releases H.265? Is it next month? next year?

Btw, has Dahua formally announced any H.265 camera? I can believe it's coming, I just had not seen a camera one.

While giving some existing Axis camera owners a firmware update to add the Zipstream feature is a welcome idea, releasing new Zipstream cameras without H.265 suggests one or more of the following to me:
• H.265 chips could be too buggy and not ready to unleash on the world.
• short-sighted not to have added H.265.
• lack of engineering capacity and/or capability to implement both Zipstream and H.265.
• cynical upgrade cycle, i.e. if you buy a H.264 Zipstream camera now and want H.265, you'll have to buy another model of camera when it is released by Axis.

Without having seen any independent test results, it appears that Zipstream is a desirable development which should have helped Axis differentiate its cameras from competing offerings. However I suspect the emerging rollout of H.265 devices may significantly counter or crush the Zipstream advantage. As you say, the real question is when Axis will release H.265? Another question is how good will the new H.265 devices perform from other manufacturers? It's going to be an exciting year!

I saw a Dahua H.265 NVR last week following the announcement of two H.265 NVRs on their website. I haven't seen any Dahua H.265 cameras or heard of any formal announcements yet.

Yes, they also have some H.265 NVRs.

Normally, a single compression level is applied to an entire video stream.

Won't a camera set to CBR dynamically change the compression level?

The key difference is that, with CBR, the same level is applied to the whole scene.

For example, 1080p 30fps camera set to 1Mb/s CBR:

(a) white wall, no motion, quantization for the whole scene/stream might be set to 27

(b) white wall, face appears on half the FoV/camera, quantization for the whole scene/stream might go to 38, even if half of the scene is still a motionless white wall.

By contrast, what Zipstream and other dynamic region compression technologies are claiming is that they would set quantization of say 27 for the part with the face but 38 for the other part of the white wall.

Thanks, my bad.

So Zipstream is dynamically changing the q in the spatial dimension and CBR in the temporal.

When tested, would it be a good idea to compare it to what Panasonic can achieve with their VIQS ?

We tried VIQS a year or two ago, the bandwidth difference savings was in the range of 10 - 20%, which is fairly negligible. Ergo, we had not pursued or considered it since. If Panasonic believes it has improved significantly, we'd consider testing it again.

John, I'm struggling to find the test. Can you give me the link ?

We didn't publish it, again because it wasn't a very significant result and Panasonic has not marketed it that hard.

Another question would be how this and other compressions impact the recording server CPU. There are differences in CPU usage between Baseline, Main, and High profiles in H.264, so I would think it would be different on Zipstream also. How will this negatively impact a limit on maximum number of recorded cameras on an existing recorder? When designing a system, we now not only have to take into account bandwidth and storage, but compression and profile that will be used on each camera to make sure the recorder being spec'd can handle the load and if required, allow for an x factor of expansion. It keeps getting trickier.

We will test client / server side load. From what Axis claims and what we can see, most, if not all of the incremental load is on the camera side.

This is a great strategy and I’m glad Axis is commercializing it. We did quite a bit of work on something similar in our lab and I recall seeing another [VENDOR] demo that clearly showed object segmentation with the background at a different frame rate than the moving foreground objects. Using a different Q-value for background is a clear win since the static portions of the scene should compress quite well. And treating the background/foreground with different GOP structures is much like using a different frame rate—also very effective.

One drawback can be subtle artifacts surrounding the moving foreground objects that don’t quite mesh with the background in all frames. But I feel like that tends to be an acceptable tradeoff in our industry (in contrast to entertainment—which is what a lot of the compression technology is geared towards). To me that opens interesting philosophical doors regarding applications and use cases of surveillance video and the trade offs involved for what might be possible over very low bit rates and to optimize storage—constraints that the entertainment industry doesn’t tend to wrestle with as much.

Of course the math involved in object segmentation and background subtraction is computationally expensive and it happens right behind the imager. And a good implementation requires close coordination with the compression hardware. So a hardware based implementation makes sense.

The relationship of this to H264/H265 can be distinct. My impression is this strategy effectively filters noise out of the static background so you’re sending what is mostly the same picture to the compressor every frame. Thus the resulting bit rates are low. But the magic happens “before” the compression. So compatibility with H264/H265 is preserved in the output. To answer the question of why aren’t they doing this with H265 might be because H265 decoders are still not widely available in our market and simply aren’t ready yet. In other words, this can give big wins even within H264, and the industry isn’t ready for H265 anyway..

Axis has added a teaser 30 second Zipstream demo video:

Hi Ethan and John.

As I remember Hikvision also claims a sort of bandwith saving. They call it "Smart ROI" http://www.cips.az/2015/?p=news__read&t=exhibitors&q=5&l=en

This reminds me of something we did back in the day at Cernium, circa 2005. The I-frames were encoded at a lower resolution than the P-frames. If you looked closely, targets were moving within a "bubble" of higher resolution. It worked well but looked weird. Customers that noticed were troubled to learn that every video frame was not a complete picture. While this is normal to us, most of our customers don't understand that. Making it obvious to them was a huge mistake.

Does anyone still have "court admissability" issues with compressed video. I remember when MPEG4 or H.264 came out and some people claimed that it wouldn't be admissable in court because of the compression technology. Of course, those same people said that MJPEG was OK - which is also compressed, just not inter-frame referenced compression.

I would think that those that fought against H.264 would hate the fact that the camera is manipulating the video, possibly leading to court issues...

No, and I have never heard of anyone who actually did have _real_ court issues.

Mostly this was fear combined with vendor hype. Remember Avigilon before they dumped JPEG2000?

I did find this:

Grant Fredericks, a well-known, well-respected video evidence expert, in a response to my email on this topic, had the following comments:

"...cases concerning the issue of inadmissibility of MPEG video are based on myth, not reality. Although experts have a number of legitimate concerns about MPEG (either MPEG 1, 2, 4, and in all their levels and forms), no one can state that MPEG is an unreliable format" (Goldstein, 2009).

Reference

Goldstein, E. (2009, April 30). The admissibility of MPEG encoded video. Canadian Security.

The admissibility of MPEG encoded video.

Thanks John, prompt as usual.

See you in Vegas - I'm getting one of those lanyards ;-).

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
CES 2019 Show Report on Jan 10, 2019
IPVM was at CES 2019 for the second year (see our CES 2018 Show Final Report) and is reporting on announcements and interesting news from the show...
Managed Video Services UL 827B Examined on Jan 09, 2019
Historically, UL listings for central stations have been important, with UL 827 having widespread support. However, few central stations have...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
CyberExtruder Face Recognition Profile on Jan 04, 2019
CyberExtruder offers 3D modeling face recognition software that they say provides quicker and more accurate matches than other 2D face recognition...
Surveillance Codec Guide on Jan 03, 2019
Codecs are core to surveillance, with names like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG commonly cited. How do they work? Why should you use them? What issues may...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
2019 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 14, 2019
The new IP Networking Book 2019 is a 285 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
Arecont Costar Layoffs on Jan 14, 2019
Arecont Vision, a Costar Company, has laid off more than 10% of their workforce in a move the company described to IPVM as a result of "important...
The False SCMP Story on Hikvision NYC AI on Jan 14, 2019
In the past week, one of Asia's largest publications, the South China Morning Post (SCMP), posted an article about "Chinese [facial recognition]...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact