Axis Zipstream Claims Average 50% Savings

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Mar 25, 2015

Axis claims that its new Zipstream compression technology can "lower bandwidth and storage requirements by an average 50% or more."

That is quite an audacious claim for such a fundamental element of video surveillance systems.

In this note, we explain how Zipstream works and how it matches up against other bandwidth 'saving' technologies and rival products:

  • Dynamic Scene Compression - How It Works
  • Dynamic I Frame Interval - What It Does
  • Axis Best and Worst Case Zipstream Scenarios
  • Axis Availability Restrictions
  • Zipstream vs H.265
  • Zipstream vs Vivotek Smart Stream and Arecont Bandwidth Savings Mode
  • Zipstream vs Ambarella
  • Zipstream vs Dahua and Hikvision
  • Zipstream Marketing Impact

************** *** *** ********* *********** ********** *** "***** ********* *** storage ************ ** ** ******* **% ** ****."

**** ** ***** ** ********* ***** *** **** * *********** element ** ***** ************ *******.

** **** ****, ** ******* *** ********* ***** *** *** it ******* ** ******* ***** ********* '******' ************ *** ***** products:

  • ******* ***** *********** - *** ** *****
  • ******* * ***** ******** - **** ** ****
  • **** **** *** ***** **** ********* *********
  • **** ************ ************
  • ********* ** *.***
  • ********* ** ******* ***** ****** *** ******* ********* ******* ****
  • ********* ** *********
  • ********* ** ***** *** *********
  • ********* ********* ******

[***************]

**********: **** ********* ***** ******* *** **** ********* **********

Bandwidth ********** ****

********* **********, **** ****** ******* **** *** **** ************ **** the **** *****, **********, ***** **** *** *********** *** ** huge. **** ** ********* ** ********** *** ********** *** ********** or *** ********* **** **.

*** ***** ***** ***** *** **** *******, *** ***** *** M3004, **** *** ** ****, ** ***, ************ ** ~**, across * **' ********** ***. ******* ***** ******* ***** ************, the *****'* ******* *** *** **/* ***** *** ***** *** *.** Mb/s, ****** ** *** *********.

************, ******* **** ** *********, ********, *** ***********, ***., ****** differing ****** ** ******* ** ********* ******, ** ** **** in *********** ****** ********* **** *******. *** ** ***** **********, ********** *** **** ******* ********* will ******* ** *** ***** ********** ** **** **********.

Dynamic ***** *********** - *** ** *****

*** *.*** ** **********, *** *** ****** ** *********** ** controlled ** *** *********** / ************ *****. ** **** *******, this ** * ***** **** * (***** ***********) ** *** (most ***********). **** **** ** *.*** ************ ****** ** * to ** (*** **********, *** *** ***** ******* / *********** ********).

********, * ****** *********** ***** ** ******* ** ** ****** video ******. *** *******, * ******* **** ****** *** * compression ***** ** **. *** ***** ***** - ******* ** is * ***** **** ** * ******'* **** *** *** same *********** *****.

*** ***** ** *** *** *** ********* ********, ******* *** ******* compression / ************ ****** ***** **** ***** *******. ****** ******* such ** ****** ** ******** *** **** * ************ ***** of ** *******, ***** *** ********** ** *** ***** **** as ***** *** ******** *** **** **********, *.*., * ************ of **. 

*** ******* ** ***** ********* *********** ****** *** ********* ***** of * ****** ** **** '****' *** '******' ** ******* portions. *** *******, *** ********* **** *** *********** ** * face *** **** *********** ** * ***** ***** **** ** typically **** *** ***** ********* / *******.

*** *** ***** **** **** ********* ** *** ******** *** technology ** ** ******** **** ***** ** *** ***** *** be ******* * **** *********** ******* ****** ********** *******.

Dynamic I ***** Interval - **** ** ****

** ******** ** ********* *********** ***** ** ***** ********, ********* also ******* * ***** ********. *** *******, ** * ***** scene **** ** ******, ** * ***** *** **** ** **** every * ******* ** ****, ***** ** ***** ******* **** occurred ** *** *****. **** ******* ****** *** ***** *** walks *******, *******, *** ****** ******* *** ******** ** * shorter ********, ******* ** * ***** ** **** **** ******. 

**** ******* ** **** *** ********* * "*** *** ****** ************* **** ****** *** **** *** ******* GOP *** **." **** ******** * ***** ** ****** **** very **** * ***** ********* ** *** ***** ******** *** VMS ******* **** ****** ** ******* * ***** ********* *** search *** ********.

Axis **** *** ***** **** ********* *********

** ****' ********* **********, **** *** ***** ****** *** ******** across ********* ******:

*** ************** ** ****:

  • ******** ****, **** *** ****** ***** *****, *** **** ** compress **** **** ******* ******** ******* ****, ******* **** ******* lots ** ******* **** ** ******* *** ****** ******* *******.
  • ***** ****, **** *** ******* *** *****, *** ****** ** compress **** ******* *********** ******* ****, ******* *** ******* *** relatively ***** / **********.
  • ***** **** ********* ** *** **** ****** ** ***** ********* due ** *********** ***** *********, *** *********, ****** *** ******* savings *********. *******, ***: ******* ********* ** *** ***** *** ******: ******** ********* ** ***** ** ****.

Axis ************ ************

****** **** ** ****' ******** ******* **** ******* *********, ******** restraining *** ********* ** *** ***** ****.

********* ** ******* ** **** ******* *************-*, ***** ** ****' ****** ******** ****. *** **** ******** cameras **** *** ** ******** ** ********* *** **** *****, **** ***** *** *** **** *** ******. *******, Axis ** ********* * **** ** *** ** ***** ***, of ******, ********* ******** *** ******.

******** ** ******* ******** ******* **** *** ********* *********** ** scheduled *** ******* ** ***** *, ****. ** **** ** test *** ***** **** **** ** ****. 

Zipstream ** *.***

** *** **** ****** *** *.*** *** ** *** ****** Axis ** ***** ** **** ****. ** **** ***, ********* could *** ** ************ ******* ******* ****** ******* *** *.***, which ** ******* ********* *** **** ****** ********** ********** ****.

**** **** *.*** *** ********* ***** ** '** ** ** savings', **** ******* ** **** ***** **** *.***. ** **** end, ** ********** *** **** ******** *****, '*** ****** ** a *** ***** ***** ***** *** ******* *** ********** ***** of ****** ******** *** ***, **** *** *** **** **** the ***** *** ****/***** *** * ****** ***** - *.***.'

Zipstream ** ******* ***** ****** *** ******* ********* ******* ****

********* ****** **** ************ ***********'* ***** ******, ** **** *********** ****** *********** ** ******* ** *** scene ** ****** *********. ** *** **** ** ***** ******, reductions ** **-**% ** **** *** ****** *** ** ** 50% ** *** *****, **** ***** ** ****' **% *** 90% *********** ** ***** ******. ************, ** *** ******* ****** tested, ******* ********* *********** ******* ***** ****** *** *** ****** than *******, ** ***** ***** ********** **** ******, ********* ******** fairly ****.

*******'* ********* ******* ****, ******* ******* ********* *******, **** *** ****** *********** ** *** as ********* ****, *** ******* ******* **** ******* **** *** scene, ********* ********* *** ******** *** ****** ** ****** *********. We ***** ********* ******* **** **% ** **% ********* ** the *****, *** ******** ***** ******* ****** *** ** **** mode. 

Zipstream ** *********

********* ** *** ******* ******* **** ******** *** ****-*** ** ******* and ***** ***** (**** *** ** *** *********** ** *.***) ******* ***** ********* *********** / ******* *** ******* ***** them. *********’* ***** ******* ************* **** **** “********” **** ****** ****** bitrate ***** *********, **** **** ***** ** ** ** *** as *** - *** **** *** **** ** *****. ********* customers, ** ******, **** ********* ***** *** ***** ********.

*** ********* *********, ***** *** *******, *** **** **** ** our **** ** ****** ********* / ******* ********. ** **** ** **** **** ********* ******* **** *******.

Zipstream ** ***** *** *********

******* ***** ** ********* ****** *** ******* ********* *******. ** that ***, **** *** ** **** ** ******** ********* ** a ****** ** *** * ******* *** ***** *******, ********** the ***** *** / ******** ** **** ******** ** ***** biggest ******* ***********.

Zipstream ********* ******

*** **** ** **** *** ************ ************, ***** ***** **** and ******* *******, **** *** *** ******** ******* ** **** the ****** **** ***** *********** (*.*., ***** *** ***********). ** that ***, ** ***** **** ********* ***** **** ****** ** launch ***** *** *********** ************* / ********* *********. *** ** the *******, ** *********** *** *** *** ***** ** ****** after *******, ***** ******* **** * ********** *********** *********.

**********, ******, * *********** ******* ** *********'* ****** **** ** based ** *** **** ** *** ****** ******** ********* ******* sacrificing *******. ** ****** ** **** *** **** ***** **** new ******** ** ******** ** ***** ****.

Comments (22)

Hi Ethan, thank you for a very interesting report. I will be very interested in reading IPVM's test report of bandwidth savings and image quality when the Axis Zipstream feature is released.

I wonder what would happen if Axis used their Zipstream feature in combination with H.265 compression? I'm a little surprised they aren't implementing both technologies now rather than waiting another year to support H.265. It would have put Axis in a better competitive position with Dahua who have recently started to trickle out H.265 devices. It will be interesting to see how the technologies compare as these two companies roll out their new products.

Axis has already stated that Zipstream can be used with H.265. The real question is when Axis releases H.265? Is it next month? next year?

Btw, has Dahua formally announced any H.265 camera? I can believe it's coming, I just had not seen a camera one.

While giving some existing Axis camera owners a firmware update to add the Zipstream feature is a welcome idea, releasing new Zipstream cameras without H.265 suggests one or more of the following to me:
• H.265 chips could be too buggy and not ready to unleash on the world.
• short-sighted not to have added H.265.
• lack of engineering capacity and/or capability to implement both Zipstream and H.265.
• cynical upgrade cycle, i.e. if you buy a H.264 Zipstream camera now and want H.265, you'll have to buy another model of camera when it is released by Axis.

Without having seen any independent test results, it appears that Zipstream is a desirable development which should have helped Axis differentiate its cameras from competing offerings. However I suspect the emerging rollout of H.265 devices may significantly counter or crush the Zipstream advantage. As you say, the real question is when Axis will release H.265? Another question is how good will the new H.265 devices perform from other manufacturers? It's going to be an exciting year!

I saw a Dahua H.265 NVR last week following the announcement of two H.265 NVRs on their website. I haven't seen any Dahua H.265 cameras or heard of any formal announcements yet.

Yes, they also have some H.265 NVRs.

Normally, a single compression level is applied to an entire video stream.

Won't a camera set to CBR dynamically change the compression level?

The key difference is that, with CBR, the same level is applied to the whole scene.

For example, 1080p 30fps camera set to 1Mb/s CBR:

(a) white wall, no motion, quantization for the whole scene/stream might be set to 27

(b) white wall, face appears on half the FoV/camera, quantization for the whole scene/stream might go to 38, even if half of the scene is still a motionless white wall.

By contrast, what Zipstream and other dynamic region compression technologies are claiming is that they would set quantization of say 27 for the part with the face but 38 for the other part of the white wall.

Thanks, my bad.

So Zipstream is dynamically changing the q in the spatial dimension and CBR in the temporal.

When tested, would it be a good idea to compare it to what Panasonic can achieve with their VIQS ?

We tried VIQS a year or two ago, the bandwidth difference savings was in the range of 10 - 20%, which is fairly negligible. Ergo, we had not pursued or considered it since. If Panasonic believes it has improved significantly, we'd consider testing it again.

John, I'm struggling to find the test. Can you give me the link ?

We didn't publish it, again because it wasn't a very significant result and Panasonic has not marketed it that hard.

Another question would be how this and other compressions impact the recording server CPU. There are differences in CPU usage between Baseline, Main, and High profiles in H.264, so I would think it would be different on Zipstream also. How will this negatively impact a limit on maximum number of recorded cameras on an existing recorder? When designing a system, we now not only have to take into account bandwidth and storage, but compression and profile that will be used on each camera to make sure the recorder being spec'd can handle the load and if required, allow for an x factor of expansion. It keeps getting trickier.

We will test client / server side load. From what Axis claims and what we can see, most, if not all of the incremental load is on the camera side.

This is a great strategy and I’m glad Axis is commercializing it. We did quite a bit of work on something similar in our lab and I recall seeing another [VENDOR] demo that clearly showed object segmentation with the background at a different frame rate than the moving foreground objects. Using a different Q-value for background is a clear win since the static portions of the scene should compress quite well. And treating the background/foreground with different GOP structures is much like using a different frame rate—also very effective.

One drawback can be subtle artifacts surrounding the moving foreground objects that don’t quite mesh with the background in all frames. But I feel like that tends to be an acceptable tradeoff in our industry (in contrast to entertainment—which is what a lot of the compression technology is geared towards). To me that opens interesting philosophical doors regarding applications and use cases of surveillance video and the trade offs involved for what might be possible over very low bit rates and to optimize storage—constraints that the entertainment industry doesn’t tend to wrestle with as much.

Of course the math involved in object segmentation and background subtraction is computationally expensive and it happens right behind the imager. And a good implementation requires close coordination with the compression hardware. So a hardware based implementation makes sense.

The relationship of this to H264/H265 can be distinct. My impression is this strategy effectively filters noise out of the static background so you’re sending what is mostly the same picture to the compressor every frame. Thus the resulting bit rates are low. But the magic happens “before” the compression. So compatibility with H264/H265 is preserved in the output. To answer the question of why aren’t they doing this with H265 might be because H265 decoders are still not widely available in our market and simply aren’t ready yet. In other words, this can give big wins even within H264, and the industry isn’t ready for H265 anyway..

Axis has added a teaser 30 second Zipstream demo video:

Hi Ethan and John.

As I remember Hikvision also claims a sort of bandwith saving. They call it "Smart ROI" http://www.cips.az/2015/?p=news__read&t=exhibitors&q=5&l=en

This reminds me of something we did back in the day at Cernium, circa 2005. The I-frames were encoded at a lower resolution than the P-frames. If you looked closely, targets were moving within a "bubble" of higher resolution. It worked well but looked weird. Customers that noticed were troubled to learn that every video frame was not a complete picture. While this is normal to us, most of our customers don't understand that. Making it obvious to them was a huge mistake.

Does anyone still have "court admissability" issues with compressed video. I remember when MPEG4 or H.264 came out and some people claimed that it wouldn't be admissable in court because of the compression technology. Of course, those same people said that MJPEG was OK - which is also compressed, just not inter-frame referenced compression.

I would think that those that fought against H.264 would hate the fact that the camera is manipulating the video, possibly leading to court issues...

No, and I have never heard of anyone who actually did have _real_ court issues.

Mostly this was fear combined with vendor hype. Remember Avigilon before they dumped JPEG2000?

I did find this:

Grant Fredericks, a well-known, well-respected video evidence expert, in a response to my email on this topic, had the following comments:

"...cases concerning the issue of inadmissibility of MPEG video are based on myth, not reality. Although experts have a number of legitimate concerns about MPEG (either MPEG 1, 2, 4, and in all their levels and forms), no one can state that MPEG is an unreliable format" (Goldstein, 2009).

Reference

Goldstein, E. (2009, April 30). The admissibility of MPEG encoded video. Canadian Security.

The admissibility of MPEG encoded video.

Thanks John, prompt as usual.

See you in Vegas - I'm getting one of those lanyards ;-).

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
Network Optix Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 11, 2019
Network Optix is arguably the last new VMS. Founded in 2010, more than a decade after most client/server VMS offerings, the company has become a...
BCDVideo Expansion And Switch From HP To Dell Examined on Mar 11, 2019
BCDVideo says they have more than tripled revenue in the past 5 years and are continuing to grow, powered most recently by switching their lead...
Arcules Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 08, 2019
Arcules has amazing advantages. Tens of millions of funding from Canon. Unlimited access to Milestone's source code (see our test results). But...
Genetec Declares "Lead With Synergis" Access Control on Mar 04, 2019
Genetec started with and is best known for its video management software. However, the company is now imploring its partners to lead with Synergis,...
Salient CompleteView 20/20 VMS Tested on Feb 27, 2019
In IPVM's last test of Salient 3 years ago, we found various problems and deficiencies. Now, Salient says their new CompleteView 20/20 "unified...
BluB0x Company Profile on Feb 20, 2019
BluB0x has doubled in revenue every year since its founding in 2013, according to CEO Patrick Barry. We originally reported on them in 2015. At the...
Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Sales Cuts At Rasilient on Feb 19, 2019
Over the past 2 years, video surveillance storage specialist Rasilient has expanded its workforce significantly, aiming to build its own branded...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Eagle Eye Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 21, 2019
Eagle Eye has been the biggest spender in the cloud VMS market including (via their owner) acquiring Brivo for $50 million and CameraManager from...
Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...
Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Insurance Startup Coalition Profile on Mar 20, 2019
Many industry people believe cybersecurity insurance is not worth it, as the voting and debate in our Cybersecurity Insurance For Security...
Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Top Metrics For Ensuring Integrator Profitability - Statistics on Mar 20, 2019
How do integrators ensure the profitability of their projects? As part of our profitability study, 100+ integrators answered the following...
Avigilon Launches 'Renewed Products Program' on Mar 19, 2019
There are lots of 'pre-owned' cars but pre-owned IP cameras? While such programs are common in other industries, in video surveillance, they are...
Hanwha Tax Evasion Probe, Camera Division Implicated on Mar 19, 2019
A Hanwha group subsidiary was raided as part of a tax evasion probe. While a Korean news media report listed the raided entity as 'Hanwha...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact