Axis 20MP Q1659 Camera Tested

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jun 13, 2017

Axis has joined the super high resolution camera trend with their Q1659, a 20MP model equipped with Canon's APS-C sensor.

We tested the Q1659 against Axis' current super low light and integrated IR models:

We tested:

  • Daytime image quality
  • Low light (<1lx) color image quality
  • Dark (<0.1lx) monochrome image quality
  • Performance with external IR
  • CPU load issues
  • VMS support
  • Multi-streaming support
  • Bandwidth/smart codecs

And more. See our full results inside.

**** *** ****** *** super **** ********** ****** trend ********* *****, * **** ***** equipped *********'* ***-* ******.

** ****** *** ***** against ****' ************ *** ****************** ** ******:

** ******:

  • ******* ***** *******
  • *** ***** (image *******
  • **** (quality
  • *********** **** ******** **
  • *** **** ******
  • *** *******
  • *****-********* *******
  • *********/***** ******

*** ****. *** *** full ******* ******.

[***************]

Further ******* ****** **

** **** ** **** the ***** ****** **. competitive ***** ****** ****** from ********, ****, ***. in ******** *****.

*******

** *** *****, *** Q1659 ******* *********** *** light *********** ********* **** Axis' ******** ***** *** light *** ********** ** models, **** ******** ***** time ****** *** ****** subject ******* *** ********* at *** ****** ******.

************, ***** *** *****'* ******** were **** ****** **** 1080p ****** (~*.* **/* day / ~** **/* night **. ~* **/* / * **/* ** 1080p), ********* ***** *** not ** ******* ** in **** **** ********** 4K+ ******. *******, **** broken **** ** **/* per *********, *** ***** consumes **** **** ********* per ** **** ***** cameras. 

***** ****** ****** ** CPU **** **** ********** the *****, ** ******* the ****** ****** **** larger ****** ** **** than ******* ***** ****** (~10-20% ** **** *** test ********, ****** *-*% for *****). ******* **** 1-2 ** ***** ******* with ******* ***** ******** cameras ** * ****** may ******** ************** ****** machines ****** *****-********* ** configured. *******, ***** ****** check **** ***** *** supports *****-********* **** **** model, ** ******** ******* Center ********* ** ********* streams, *** ***** ********* only *** ** *** tests (****** ******** ** Genetec *** *********).

Q1659 *******

**** ***** ******* ****** depending ** ***** **** is ****, **** ~$*,*** USD *** *** ****/**.* model ******* ~$*,*** *** the **-*****/**.* ****. 

**** ** * ***** ***** premium **** ******* ***** *** light *** ** ******. Compared ** ******* "*****" imager (~*/*"+) ***** *** light ****** **** ****' own*****(~$*,***) ** ************* ** *****-*(~$*,*** ****), *** ***** starts ** ****** ** the ****.

Physical ********

*** ***** ****** **** itself ** ******* ** an ********* ******* ** other * ****** ******. Aside **** *** ******* different **** *** **** mount, ******** ** *** camera *** ******* ** other *** ******, **** I/O, *****, *** ******* storage. *******, *** ***** also ******** * *** (Small **** ****** *********) slot, ******** ***** ** directly ******* ***** ** the ******.

**** **** **** ****** other **** ***** *******, such ** *** **** VB770 ** ******** ***, the ***** ******** * mechanical ** *** ******, making ** ** *********. 

Significant *** ******

** *** *****, ******* the **** ********** **** stream ******** ** ********* in *** **** ** 8-10% ****** *** *** and ~**% ** ***** when ******* *** ******* noise *********. ***** ********* were ******* ** *** machines (***** *****) *** using **** *********** *** Genetec ******** ****.

**** ******** **** ****** a ******* ***** ****** was *********** *****, ********* a ******** ** * percent.

****** * (******):

  • ******* ** ***
  • ***** **** **-****** *.* GHz
  • **** ***
  • ****** ******* ** ****

****** * (*******):

  • ******* ** ***
  • *** ***-**** *.** ***
  • *** ***
  • ****** ******* ** *** Ti

VMS/Multistreaming *******

** **** **** ** connect *** ***** ** Avigilon, *****, *******, *** Milestone ******* *****. **** that ** ** ********* listed ** ********* **** by ***** *** *******.

************** ******* ** **** thereof ****** ** ***:

  • ******** ******* ******:** ********* ******, **** 20MP ****** ****
  • ***********: **** ****** **** *** ********** stream
  • ******* ******** ****:**** *.*** *** *** MJPEG ******* (***** *****)
  • ********* ********: **** *.*** *** *** MJPEG *******

 

 

Test *****

** ****** *** ***** in ** **** ******* lot/field, ~***' **** *****, shown *****. * **** lens *** ****, ****** the ****** * ~**° angle ** ****:

*** ******** ***** ***** the ********* ****:

Daytime: ******* ******* ** **** ** *****

****** *** ***, ** 60' ********, ******* ** all ******* *** ******, but *** ***** ***** very **** ******* *** to >** *** *** of ***** ******.

******** ******** *** *** width, *** ***** ***** shows *********** ****** ******* of *** *******, ***** only ***** *********/******** ******* are ******* ** *** 1080p ******. *** ***** models ******* **** **** 1 ** *** **** chart ***** *** ***** is ******* ** **** 6/7.

** ~***' ********, ***** subject ******* *** ***** visible, ** **** ** 2-3 ***** ** *** test *****, ***** ** details *** ******* ** the ***** *******, **** detection.

*** **** ** **** at ***', *** ******** distance ******. *** *******'* clothing *** **** ***** are ***********, ** *** 2 ***** ** *** test *****, ** *** Q1659.

Low ***** ***** ****: ****** ******* / ********* 

****, ** ****** ** night **** ******** ****** on ** *** *** cameras ********* ** ***** mode ** *****. ***** levels **** ~*.**** ***** to *** ********, ******** to ~*.** ** ~***'.

** ***** *****, *** test ***** ** ****** out ******** ** *** 1080p ******, **** **** 1-2 ***** *******. *******, subject ******* ** *** Q1659 **** **** ******** than ***** *******, **** recognizable ****** *******.

** ~***' ********, ***** subject ******* *** ******* in *** *****, ***** with ***** *-* ** the **** *****, ***** both ***** ****** ******* detection ****.

*******, ** ~***' ******** (~41PPF), *** ******* ** still ****** ********** ** the *****, *** ******** by ***** ** *** other *******.

Dark ********** ****: ***** ****** *******

** **** ****** **** exterior ****** ***, ******** to ~*.** *** **** the ***** *** ***** in ********** ****, *** IR ******* ** *** P3225 ** **. **** that *** **** *** 3/4 **** ** *** time ** *******, *** only ****** ** ***** in *** ******* ** the *****. 

** ~**', *-* ***** of *** **** ***** are ******* ** *** Q1659, ***** **** *** first **** ** ******* in ******. **** ****** details *** ******* ** the *****, ** **** as *** *******'* ********. The */*" *********** ***** shows ***** ****** ******* of *** *******, ***** the ***** *********** ******** detection ****.

******* **** *** *******, the ***** ******** ***** detection ** *** *******, while ** ** ********* to ****** ** ***** cameras.

*******, ** ***', *** subject ** ********* ** detect ** *** *****, and **** ** ******* noise ** ******.

Added ** ************: ***** ******** *******/*********

****** **** ***** ****** surveillance *******, **** ** the ******** *** ****** or ****'* *****, *** Q1659 ******** * ********* IR *** ******, ****** it ** ********* ** night. ******* ** ****, we ****** *********** ** the ****** ****** **** a****** ***** ** (*** our ****)** *** *** ******** IR ******* ***********.

***** *** **° ****, the ***** *** * ***** of ****/~***'. *** **** below ***** *** ******* illuminated ** **** ******** in *** ***** (** the **** ** *** large ******* ****), *** no ******* *** *********.

** ***** *****, ******* of *** ******* *** clear ** *** *****, with *** ***** ******* to **** *. *** Q1635 ** ****** *** by ****** ************, *** the *****'* ********** ** much ****** **** *** added ******.

******** ********, ******* ** the ******* *** ***** clear ** *** *****, with * ***** ** the **** ***** *******, while **** ********* ** possible ** ***** *******.

*******, ** ~***', *** subject ** ***** ****** detectable ** **** *** Q1659 *** *****, ****** without *******.

Framerate ***********

*** ***** ** ******* to * *** ** its **** **** **********, limited ******** ** **** 4K/12MP ****** ***** **** 30 ** ** ****** as *******.

** ** ******* ** the ******* ** **** framerate, ** *** ** the ****** ** * busy ****. *** ***** SUV ******** **** *** right, ********* ~** ***, moves ~**' ******* **** frame. ** ********, ** a ** *** ******, the ******* ***** **** only **** **** **' per *****, ********* **** more ******** ****** **** the **** ****.

**** * ******* ******* across *** ***** ** view, ** ***** ***** 2.5' **** *****. ** a ** *** ******, he ***** **** **** a *** ******. 

Sample *****

********** ******* *** ******** day *** ***** ***** of *** ***** ** its **** ** ********* resolution ** ****~*** ** .*** ****, ******* *** ******* walking **** ~***' ** the ****** ********.

Bandwidth **********

*** *****'* ******** **** ****** than ***** ******* ******, with ******** ** **** 10 **/* ** *****, but *** ***** ******* compared ** ** *** higher ********** ******* ** past ***** (***** ** Mb/s+). ** **** ** cover **** ** ******** shootouts ******* *********** ***** imager ******.

**** **** *** ******* in **** **** **************** *. ******* **** *** to ********* **** **** Dynamic *** *** ** 1200.

**** ****** **** ** bitrate *** *********, *** Q1659 ** *** ****** camera ****** ** ***, coming ** **-**% ***** than *** ***** ******.

Test **********

  • **** *****:*.**.*
  • **** *****:*.**.*.*
  • **** *****-*** ****:*.**.*

Comments (18)

Nice evaluation.  Good performance! 

It would be very interesting to see how it compares against the other brands.

Agreed! And we will be testing it against others in reports coming up. We are in the process of organizing those tests now.

I would really like to see depth of field also tested at various f-stops. I have found DoF to be a huge issue with these large sensor cameras. To compensate for the lack of day/night in the competing brands a low f-stop (at least f2.8 or not down to f1.4) is necessary but as a result you loose your DoF. Even better would be an IPVM DoF calculator:)

This is more of an issue with full frame sensors than APC-C sensors.  I have had DoF issues when using the Avigilon 30MP cameras compared to the 8MP and 16MP.  We have done shots where with the 30MP we could not get the whole image in focus but the issues went away with the 16MP and 8MP.

Across the board it is a very competitive product.  The bandwidth utilization will compare very favorably simply due to the smart codec.

Thanks Ethan!  Nice job.

VB770 vs Q1659. Test a train passing in the night at about 100 feet away and as low lux as you can find out in the country. Make sure your ISO are set the same.

Great test - can't wait to see it against the other high MP options!

As said this one against the Sony VB770 would be very interesting.

Great write up.

 

Sounds like a pretty significant load on the VMS. I'd be interested in understanding what the VMS impact is with multiple being viewed simultaneously on the client PC spec you have outlined above. How many can be viewed, etc.? What's the driving factor behind the high CPU uptick? Is that the load from server side motion processing or something else?

The CPU load measured is on the client side, not server. Exacq doesn't do server side motion, and it was turned off in Genetec. 

On the server side, CPU usage didn't spike abnormally. Load on both VMSes was simply a function of throughput, as with lower resolution models. We did not test server side motion load, but that's a good thought. Usually that processing is done on a substream, regardless.

Was the Intel equipped client utilizing Intel's Quick sync on the Mobo? I know this has to be turned on in the BIOS when also utilizing with a discreet graphics card.  I know Milestone's client is supposed to utilize it and I think Genetec does as well.  This might bring down the CPU load.

Good question! We did not test with Quick Sync, since the machines both have discrete NVidia cards. But I can check that when we put the camera up for testing again.

Thank you for the informative report,

We would like to see and know more about the user experience with this camera from an operational prospective when you have 50 plus cameras connected to a VMS and displayed on a video wall.

In an operational environment things go fast, zooming in and out, doing live and playback at the same time, exporting clips, panning left and right to track an individual, all while you have 50 plus cameras displayed on the video wall .

I also appreciate the bandwidth saving graphs you shared with us by using  Zip stream, what type of activity was the camera recording for these tests? We would like to know if this can be applied in an environment where there is is constant activity: like stadium or airport, etc.. will be interesting to see how useful Zip stream will be there.  

 

I think this is a more realistic shot and bandwidth that you will see from this camera in the real world.   ~19 Mbps  20MP Zipstream High and Dynamic GOP 120 at 8FPS

Stadiums and Airports would be higher as the FOV would be more complex than this shot. 

He is a link to the full 20MP image. 

 

 

 

Hello,

I'd also suggest to add the 4K mode as well, where it delivers the full 25fps - I think this might be more often used than the full-blown 20MP mode.

I didn't understand why to do a comparison between 4K, 20MP and 1080p cameras.. is almost like to compare bananas and watermelons, does not make sense. I think the right Axis camera to be compared with Dahua HF8835F is P1368, dont you think?
Of course the 20MP sensor camera will perform worst in dark and will generate a biger net troughput.

I would like to see a Axis Q1659 vs Avigilon 24L-H4PRO-B super hight resolution cameras comparison. It would be interesting.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming the "modular design allows for easy installation". We bought and...
IR Surveillance Camera Guide on Feb 06, 2020
Integrated infrared (IR) cameras are everywhere in 2020, but not all IR is created equal, with many differences in coverage, overexposure,...
Axis Next Gen P32 Camera Tested (P3245-LVE) on Dec 18, 2019
Axis has released the next generation of their widely used P32 camera series, now with their current ARTPEC-7 chip, claiming their imaging...
Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) Guide on Oct 01, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Hikvision 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 02, 2019
With their latest Smart Series 5 cameras, Hikvision is claiming cameras "fully loaded" with "state-of-the-art technology for high performance and...
Hanwha 4K Wisenet P Camera Tested on Jul 30, 2019
Hanwha claims "premium performance" and to "deliver the best in high resolution performance and efficiency" with their Wisenet P series 4K models,...
Avigilon 32MP and 12MP H4 Multisensor Cameras Tested on Jun 11, 2019
Avigilon has released their H4 Multi-Sensor line of cameras claiming "broad scene coverage and high image detail" We bought and tested the...
Vivotek 20MP Multi-Imager Tested on May 30, 2019
Vivotek has released their latest repositionable multi-imager camera, the MA9321-EHTV, a 20 MP model claiming "Supreme Night Visibility", "Optimal...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...

Most Recent Industry Reports

USA ICI Elevated Skin Temperature Detectors Examined on Apr 06, 2020
Infrared Cameras, Inc. (ICI) is aiming to help slow the spread of COVID-19 with "pinpoint accurate skin temperature measurement" using their...
Trade Groups Request NDAA Blacklist Delay Citing Coronavirus on Apr 06, 2020
Two trade groups representing government contractors have asked Congress to delay implementation of the NDAA's 'blacklist' clause from this August...
Coronavirus Hits Manufacturers, Standing Now, Worse To Come on Apr 06, 2020
Coronavirus is hitting security manufacturers, though overall modestly for now, with worse expected to come, new IPVM survey results...
FLIR New Coronavirus Prioritized Temperature Screening Camera Examined on Apr 03, 2020
FLIR has announced a new series of thermal cameras "prioritized for entities working to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 virus", the A400/A700...
ADI Branch Burglary on Apr 03, 2020
A security systems distributor branch is an odd target for burglary but that happened this week at ADI's Memphis location. Vehicle Smash &amp;...
Hikvision And Dahua Now Blocked From Conforming ONVIF Products on Apr 03, 2020
Dahua and Hikvision, sanctioned for human rights abuses, are now blocked from submitting products for ONVIF conformance, a blow to the mega China...
YCombinator AI Startup Visual One Tested on Apr 02, 2020
Startup Visual One, backed by Silicon Valley's powerful Y Combinator, aims to be "Your 24/7 Watchman" with advanced analytics and object...
Free IPVM Memberships For The Unemployed on Apr 02, 2020
IPVM is giving 3-month free memberships (regular price $99) for the unemployed, no questions asked. To get it, just contact us, your request...
Dahua Faked Coronavirus Camera Marketing on Apr 01, 2020
Dahua has conducted a coronavirus camera global marketing campaign centered around a faked detection. Now, Dahua has expanded this to the USA,...
Video Surveillance Trends 101 on Apr 01, 2020
This report examines major industry factors and how they could impact video surveillance in the next 5 - 10 years. This is part of our Video...