Axis Video Analytics Are Weak

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Oct 05, 2015

For more than a decade, video analytics has frustrated and disappointed users.

Now, Axis has released their own "series of robust video analytics applications" that they call Guard Suite. Unfortunately, IPVM's testing shows that Axis' video analytics are weak. We tested both the Q1615 and the P1428E with the motion and fence applications ($149 MSRP each but free 30-day trial applications are available here).

*** **** **** * decade, ***** ********* *** frustrated *** ************ *****.

***, **** *** ******** ***** own "****** ** ****** ***** analytics ************" **** **** call***** *****. *************, ****'* ******* shows **** ****' ***** analytics *** ****. ** tested **** *** ***** and *** ****** **** the ****** *** ***** applications ($*** **** **** but **** **-*** ***** applications ************ ****).

** ** ************* *** surprising ***** **** ******* quality ***** *** ****** R&D ******.

[***************]

*********

******** ** ****' ******** effort,*** *, **** ***** ***** sources **** **** ******* or **********. ** *** tests, ***** ***** *** not ******** ******* ******, birds, ** **** ** *******, occasional ******** ** *** 3. 

** **** ***, ******** size, **********-****, **** *** weather, ********** ******** ****** slowly **** ***** ***** should work ********** *** ********.

*********

**** ***** ***** ** dumb.

***** ******* *** ** the ******, *** **** Guard ***** ********* ** reliably ****** ***-***** **********. **** modest **** ***** **********, false ********* *** ***** negatives ****** *********** **** Guard ***** ********** ** recognize **** ** * real ***** ** ******, wires, *******, ***. ***** problems *** *** **** severe ************ (******)******** ******* (******).

*********** *** **** ** intelligence is * ********** ***** process **** ***** ******** controls ** ******* **** might **** ********** *** this, ****** ********, ***** largely ******* **** *************, and ***** ******* **** provides ************* ***** *** calibration ** ******* ***********.

Market ****** / ***************

** *** *** **** Guard ***** ****** *** use ** ** ****** indoor ****** ** ****** in ** ***** *** week ** ******* ** the ***** ******** *** plan ** *** **. Despite ****' ****** ******, Guard ***** ** *** 'robust'.

** ****** *********** ***** this ** ** ********** by *** **** *********** and *** ********* ** overcome **. ** ** not *** **** ***** widely ****, ******* **** to ******** ** ***** on *** ***** ******** apps.

Performance ******

** **** ******* ** ***** down *** *** ****** impacting **** ***** ***** performance, ********* ***** ***** issues, ****** ***********, *** more, ** **** *****:


***** *********** 

****' *********, **** *** 3 ****** **, ****** from ******** ***** *********** from *****, ********, *******, and ***** **********. ** the ***** *****, *** brush ** *** ***** side ** *** *** is **** ** ******* by *** ******, ******* calibrating *** **** *** perspective. **** ******** ** far ** ** ************ cause ***** *********** ** the ******** **** ** the *****. 

***** *********, **** ** Avigilon *** ******* *** not ********** ***** ******** activations.

****** *********** 

** *** *******, ******** crossing * ******** ***** Axis ***** ***** **** often *** ********. ** the ***** *****, *** camera ****** **** *** detect *** ******* ** an ****** ***** ** is **** *** ****. Avigilon's *** ****** *** 100% ******** ***** **** same *****.

** ******* ******, **** was **** *****, **** Axis ******* ******* **** than **% ** *** time, ***** ******** *** successful >**%. ** *** example *****, ******* *** subject ***** **** ** an ****** ***** ** running, *** ****** ***** to ****** *** **** he ****** ******.

**** **** ** ***** FOVs, **** **** **** to ****** *** ******* as * ***** ******, tripwire *********** ****** **** not ** ****** ** *** examples *****. *******, **** still *** ******* ********* running ********, ******* **** about **% ** *** time.

** *****, ****** ********** at ****** ****** **** frequent, ** ****, **** with *** ******* ** well ***** ****** ******** areas ** *** *****, reviewed ** **** *****:

********* *****

***** * ~**° ********** field ** ****, ***** Suite ********* **** ******** at * ******* ***** of ***** ***' ***** *** 1080p ***** ****** *** day. **** ** ***** **% less ******** **** *** Avigilon *** ******, ***** covered ~***' ****.

**** **** **** ** the ******* ***** ******** detection *** ******** (>**%). Beyond ****, ******** ** normal ******* ****** *** **** frequently ******, ****** ********* spotty.

Setup *** ***********

**** ***** ***** ********** perspective *********** *** ***** ** their ******** ************, **** as *** *, ******** to ****** ********* ******** and ****** **** ** measuring ******* ** *** FOV.

**** ******** ******* ******** on **** *******, **** instructing ***** ** *** measurements "** ********* ********* from *** ******."

******** ** *****

******** ** *****, ***** also ******** *********** (******** does ***), ***** *** several *** *********** ** this *******:

  • ** ******* ****/***** ***** window:****' *********** ************ *** performed ** * ***** window, **** ** ****** to ********* **** ** enlarge *** ****** ** more ********** ******* ******** as ** ***** (**** A ** *** ***** below). **** *** **** it ********* ** ****** measurements ** *** ***** top *** ****** ** an ******, ******** ********.
  • ***** ********* ** ********:**** **** * **** to ******* *******, **** a ***** *** ** either *** ***** ********* size, ***** *** ******* the **** ** *** object ***** ********. ***** uses * ******* * shape (**** * *****) to ******* *** ****** scroll ***** ********** ** size, ****** ** ****** to ****** ** *** top *** ****** ** an ******.
  • ** ******** ***********:**** ******** **** ****** of *******, *** ******** calibration ***** ** ***** (and *****'* ****** *** releases). (**** * ** image *****)
  • ** ******* ****:***** ******** * ******* marker ***** ** **** to ****** ****** *********** of *** ******, ** well ** ******* ******* in *** ***. **** does ***.

************, **** ******** ** visual ************ ***** ** check *** ******** ** measurements, **** ** ****** or ********, ** ****** measurements *** ********. ***** and ***** **** ******* this *******.

*******, **** ******** ** maximum **** ******** ** vehicle **. ***** **************. All ******* *** ********, regardless ** ****/*****.

*********** *************

** *** ***** ***** we *********** *** **** calibration ******* *** *** issues ***** *****:

VMS ***********

*********, **** ***** ***** is ******* ** ****** integration *** *** ****** or ***** ***** ****. It ** ****** **** integrations **** ** ******** in *** **** *** months, **** **** *******:

"**** ***** ***** **** be ********* ** **** ****** ******* *** ******* *** ********* Genetec *** ******* ******* through **** *******’ ***** stream, ***** ********* ******* will ******* ****** ***********. Support ** ******* ****., Exacq ************ *** ***** is ******* ** ** available ** *** *** of ****."

** ** ***, ***** may ******* ***** ****** by ********** **** ** the ***** *** ****** in *** ******, ** seen ** *** *** of *** ****** *****. Users *** *** * motion **** ** ********* motion **** ** *** area ***** **** **** appears, *********** ******** ** the ******** ****:

***** *** **** **** TCP ****** ************* **** the ****** ** ***** which ****** ****. **** is ************ ** *** video ***** ***** ***** the *********** ** ***** Suite **** *****, **** event **** ********** *** ********** overlaid **** **** *****.

Comments (9)

Use digital barriers on a Axis - UK iLids approved. IMHO it just works :)

The analytics developed by Axis was informed to target a low-end segment of VCA, although a step up from their VMD and simple cross-line it was not to become a high-end VCA (yet at least). The argument was not to compromise their open platform by competing with the 3rd party higher-end VCA solutions that can run on their cameras.

What I'm a little bit surprised about is the price, I had anticipated that they were going to offer this for a much lower cost, more in line with their previous Cross Line Detection.

I think it is dangerous to offer analytics for a 'low-end segment of VCA'. It is very hard to determine how poorly the analytics will work in different scenarios, which makes it likely that they are deployed in conditions they cannot handle well, which makes customers frustrated and causes integrators to lose lots of money troubleshooting / trying to optimize.

Axis lead marketing claims for Guard Suite is "Robust and reliable indoor and outdoor detection" that "Protect and detect around the clock". If they really wanted it to be 'low-end', then they should have avoided such claims. As is, they have set expectations that they cannot meet.

Yes, unfortunately marketing talk will almost always over-sell products.

As for targeting the low-end, that's what they did with the Cross Line (in my opinion). It seemed to perform rather well compared to its competitors in the tests you performed. But I guess their marketing language wasn't as bold then.

http://ipvm.com/report/analytics-rain-axis-bosch-sony

http://ipvm.com/report/camera-analytics-tested

I would personally be extremely reluctant to use the Axis Cross Line in any outdoor environment since the consequences of missed alarms and a high false alarm rate would be devastating to our costs and brand value.

It will however be interesting to see how well the new Axis analytics perform. Hopefully it is a step up from the old Cross Line and you seemed to think that it at least reduced the false-alarm rate somewhat compared to VMD 3.0. Perhaps it can perform good enough in ideal, sterile environments (as you mentioned in the test).

If you have time for it, it would be interesting to see how the latest Bosch-analytics compares with the new Axis as the latest Bosch should be much better than the old.

Similarly to the Bosch analytics (as well as just about any other VCA on the market that is actively developed), I think we'll see improved performance over time with the new Axis solution, the question is when (or if) it will be a good enough to use in non-ideal scenarios as well and whether it will be enough to be competitive towards the other camera manufacturers. Only time will tell...

Axis Crossline definitely had more false alert issues than you see in Guard Suite. I recall headlights, shadows, and blowing leaves being bigger issues than even what you see here. Guard Suite is at least far less susceptible to the headlights/shadows.

That being said, Crossline also didn't seem to have the same rate of missed objects that Guard Suite does. That's likely because it detected everything as an object, like debris/headlights/shadows, so it was less choosy and less likely to drop an object once detected.

I would love to see an on-board analytic shoot between Pelco, Axis, Samsung, Bosch etc..

The placement of bars for calibration in you tests (see the "Axis Perspective Calibration" Figure) is certainly wrong because bars should be normal to the ground plane. Otherwise the data essential for calibration will be inaccurate. This is best seen with bars 1 and 2 drawn over the two cars. The bars should go along the front door vertical edge (which is not at all "vertical" in the picture).

I don't know if Axis has made a note of this fact in its manual but no calibration is possible with bars drawn at random.

The bars are not drawn at random. The bars you see on the cars were drawn along the door line from the roof to the ground as you point out. However, Axis snaps the lines to vertical after they're drawn, but they remain the same length. I measured the cars those lines were drawn on, as well, to be accurate.

The cars themselves don't appear level due to the angle of view. The FOV overall is level, though, as you can see the poles in the background are vertical.

Also, this scene was later recalibrated when I moved cameras back to this point for further testing.

For reference, Axis gives little guidance as to what is right/wrong in this calibration, nor any best practice in their manual.

Thanks for your clarification. Really strange that Axis "snaps" the bars to vertical... No way to double check the bars had been drawn correctly.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Video Analytics

Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
Verkada People And Face Analytics Tested on Aug 16, 2019
This week, Verkada released "People Analytics", including face analytics that they describe is a "game-changing feature" that "pushes the...
Dahua Analytics+ Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Dahua's analytics have performed poorly in past shootouts. But now, they claim their new Analytics+ "algorithms significantly improve accuracy and...
Honeywell Speaks On NDAA Ban, New Non-Banned Cameras and Cybersecurity on Aug 06, 2019
For years, Honeywell has depended on Dahua, a company with a poor cybersecurity track record and now banned by the US NDAA, for the development and...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to ab emerging AI cloud era.  The goal of this history is to...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Ivideon Russian VSaaS Profile on Jun 27, 2019
Ivideon was an early VSaaS entrant, initially focusing on the consumer market, claiming massive growth to IPVM in 2014. We spoke to Ivideon, to...
Directory of 60 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...

Most Recent Industry Reports

TMA Apologizes to Amazon / Ring on Aug 23, 2019
Not only is Amazon / Ring making major incursions into the residential security market, the organization representing the biggest incumbents, The...
China Dahua Replaces Their Software With US Pepper on Aug 22, 2019
What does a US government banned company do to improve its security positioning in the US? Well, Dahua is unveiling a novel solution, partnering...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
JCI Sues Wyze on Aug 21, 2019
The mega manufacturer / integrator JCI has sued the fast-growing $20 camera Seattle startup Wyze. Inside this note: Share the court...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact