Axis Video Analytics Are Weak

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Oct 05, 2015

For more than a decade, video analytics has frustrated and disappointed users.

Now, Axis has released their own "series of robust video analytics applications" that they call Guard Suite [link no longer available]. Unfortunately, IPVM's testing shows that Axis' video analytics are weak. We tested both the Q1615 and the P1428E with the motion and fence applications ($149 MSRP each but free 30-day trial applications are available here [link no longer available]).

*** **** **** * decade, ***** ********* *** frustrated *** ************ *****.

***, **** *** ******** ***** own "****** ** ****** ***** analytics ************" **** **** call ***** ***** [**** no ****** *********]. *************, IPVM's ******* ***** **** Axis' ***** ********* *** weak. ** ****** **** the ***** *** *** P1428E **** *** ****** and ***** ************ ($*** MSRP **** *** **** 30-day ***** ************ *** available **** [**** ** longer *********]).

** ** ************* *** surprising ***** **** ******* quality ***** *** ****** R&D ******.

[***************]

*********

******** ** ****' ******** effort,*** *, **** ***** ***** sources **** **** ******* or **********. ** *** tests, ***** ***** *** not ******** ******* ******, birds, ** **** ** *******, occasional ******** ** *** 3. 

** **** ***, ******** size, **********-****, **** *** weather, ********** ******** ****** slowly **** ***** ***** should work ********** *** ********.

*********

**** ***** ***** ** dumb.

***** ******* *** ** the ******, *** **** Guard ***** ********* ** reliably ****** ***-***** **********. **** modest **** ***** **********, false ********* *** ***** negatives ****** *********** **** Guard ***** ********** ** recognize **** ** * real ***** ** ******, wires, *******, ***. ***** problems *** *** **** severe ************ (******)******** ******* (******).

*********** *** **** ** intelligence is * ********** ***** process **** ***** ******** controls ** ******* **** might **** ********** *** this, ****** ********, ***** largely ******* **** *************, and ***** ******* **** provides ************* ***** *** calibration ** ******* ***********.

Market ****** / ***************

** *** *** **** Guard ***** ****** *** use ** ** ****** indoor ****** ** ****** in ** ***** *** week ** ******* ** the ***** ******** *** plan ** *** **. Despite ****' ****** ******, Guard ***** ** *** 'robust'.

** ****** *********** ***** this ** ** ********** by *** **** *********** and *** ********* ** overcome **. ** ** not *** **** ***** widely ****, ******* **** to ******** ** ***** on *** ***** ******** apps.

Performance ******

** **** ******* ** ***** down *** *** ****** impacting **** ***** ***** performance, ********* ***** ***** issues, ****** ***********, *** more, ** **** *****:


***** *********** 

****' *********, **** *** 3 ****** **, ****** from ******** ***** *********** from *****, ********, *******, and ***** **********. ** the ***** *****, *** brush ** *** ***** side ** *** *** is **** ** ******* by *** ******, ******* calibrating *** **** *** perspective. **** ******** ** far ** ** ************ cause ***** *********** ** the ******** **** ** the *****. 

***** *********, **** ** Avigilon *** ******* *** not ********** ***** ******** activations.

****** *********** 

** *** *******, ******** crossing * ******** ***** Axis ***** ***** **** often *** ********. ** the ***** *****, *** camera ****** **** *** detect *** ******* ** an ****** ***** ** is **** *** ****. Avigilon's *** ****** *** 100% ******** ***** **** same *****.

** ******* ******, **** was **** *****, **** Axis ******* ******* **** than **% ** *** time, ***** ******** *** successful >**%. ** *** example *****, ******* *** subject ***** **** ** an ****** ***** ** running, *** ****** ***** to ****** *** **** he ****** ******.

**** **** ** ***** FOVs, **** **** **** to ****** *** ******* as * ***** ******, tripwire *********** ****** **** not ** ****** ** *** examples *****. *******, **** still *** ******* ********* running ********, ******* **** about **% ** *** time.

** *****, ****** ********** at ****** ****** **** frequent, ** ****, **** with *** ******* ** well ***** ****** ******** areas ** *** *****, reviewed ** **** *****:

********* *****

***** * ~**° ********** field ** ****, ***** Suite ********* **** ******** at * ******* ***** of ***** ***' ***** *** 1080p ***** ****** *** day. **** ** ***** **% less ******** **** *** Avigilon *** ******, ***** covered ~***' ****.

**** **** **** ** the ******* ***** ******** detection *** ******** (>**%). Beyond ****, ******** ** normal ******* ****** *** **** frequently ******, ****** ********* spotty.

Setup *** ***********

**** ***** ***** ********** perspective *********** *** ***** ** their ******** ************, **** as *** *, ******** to ****** ********* ******** and ****** **** ** measuring ******* ** *** FOV.

**** ******** ******* ******** on **** *******, **** instructing ***** ** *** measurements "** ********* ********* from *** ******."

******** ** *****

******** ** *****, ***** also ******** *********** (******** does ***), ***** *** several *** *********** ** this *******:

  • ** ******* ****/***** ***** window:****' *********** ************ *** performed ** * ***** window, **** ** ****** to ********* **** ** enlarge *** ****** ** more ********** ******* ******** as ** ***** (**** A ** *** ***** below). **** *** **** it ********* ** ****** measurements ** *** ***** top *** ****** ** an ******, ******** ********.
  • ***** ********* ** ********:**** **** * **** to ******* *******, **** a ***** *** ** either *** ***** ********* size, ***** *** ******* the **** ** *** object ***** ********. ***** uses * ******* * shape (**** * *****) to ******* *** ****** scroll ***** ********** ** size, ****** ** ****** to ****** ** *** top *** ****** ** an ******.
  • ** ******** ***********:**** ******** **** ****** of *******, *** ******** calibration ***** ** ***** (and *****'* ****** *** releases). (**** * ** image *****)
  • ** ******* ****:***** ******** * ******* marker ***** ** **** to ****** ****** *********** of *** ******, ** well ** ******* ******* in *** ***. **** does ***.

************, **** ******** ** visual ************ ***** ** check *** ******** ** measurements, **** ** ****** or ********, ** ****** measurements *** ********. ***** and ***** **** ******* this *******.

*******, **** ******** ** maximum **** ******** ** vehicle **. ***** **************. All ******* *** ********, regardless ** ****/*****.

*********** *************

** *** ***** ***** we *********** *** **** calibration ******* *** *** issues ***** *****:

VMS ***********

*********, **** ***** ***** is ******* ** ****** integration *** *** ****** or ***** ***** ****. It ** ****** **** integrations **** ** ******** in *** **** *** months, **** **** *******:

"**** ***** ***** **** be ********* ** **** ****** ******* *** ******* *** ********* Genetec *** ******* ******* through **** *******’ ***** stream, ***** ********* ******* will ******* ****** ***********. Support ** ******* ****., Exacq ************ *** ***** is ******* ** ** available ** *** *** of ****."

** ** ***, ***** may ******* ***** ****** by ********** **** ** the ***** *** ****** in *** ******, ** seen ** *** *** of *** ****** *****. Users *** *** * motion **** ** ********* motion **** ** *** area ***** **** **** appears, *********** ******** ** the ******** ****:

***** *** **** **** TCP ****** ************* **** the ****** ** ***** which ****** ****. **** is ************ ** *** video ***** ***** ***** the *********** ** ***** Suite **** *****, **** event **** ********** *** ********** overlaid **** **** *****.

Comments (9)

Use digital barriers on a Axis - UK iLids approved. IMHO it just works :)

The analytics developed by Axis was informed to target a low-end segment of VCA, although a step up from their VMD and simple cross-line it was not to become a high-end VCA (yet at least). The argument was not to compromise their open platform by competing with the 3rd party higher-end VCA solutions that can run on their cameras.

What I'm a little bit surprised about is the price, I had anticipated that they were going to offer this for a much lower cost, more in line with their previous Cross Line Detection.

I think it is dangerous to offer analytics for a 'low-end segment of VCA'. It is very hard to determine how poorly the analytics will work in different scenarios, which makes it likely that they are deployed in conditions they cannot handle well, which makes customers frustrated and causes integrators to lose lots of money troubleshooting / trying to optimize.

Axis lead marketing claims for Guard Suite is "Robust and reliable indoor and outdoor detection" that "Protect and detect around the clock". If they really wanted it to be 'low-end', then they should have avoided such claims. As is, they have set expectations that they cannot meet.

Yes, unfortunately marketing talk will almost always over-sell products.

As for targeting the low-end, that's what they did with the Cross Line (in my opinion). It seemed to perform rather well compared to its competitors in the tests you performed. But I guess their marketing language wasn't as bold then.

http://ipvm.com/report/analytics-rain-axis-bosch-sony

http://ipvm.com/report/camera-analytics-tested

I would personally be extremely reluctant to use the Axis Cross Line in any outdoor environment since the consequences of missed alarms and a high false alarm rate would be devastating to our costs and brand value.

It will however be interesting to see how well the new Axis analytics perform. Hopefully it is a step up from the old Cross Line and you seemed to think that it at least reduced the false-alarm rate somewhat compared to VMD 3.0. Perhaps it can perform good enough in ideal, sterile environments (as you mentioned in the test).

If you have time for it, it would be interesting to see how the latest Bosch-analytics compares with the new Axis as the latest Bosch should be much better than the old.

Similarly to the Bosch analytics (as well as just about any other VCA on the market that is actively developed), I think we'll see improved performance over time with the new Axis solution, the question is when (or if) it will be a good enough to use in non-ideal scenarios as well and whether it will be enough to be competitive towards the other camera manufacturers. Only time will tell...

Axis Crossline definitely had more false alert issues than you see in Guard Suite. I recall headlights, shadows, and blowing leaves being bigger issues than even what you see here. Guard Suite is at least far less susceptible to the headlights/shadows.

That being said, Crossline also didn't seem to have the same rate of missed objects that Guard Suite does. That's likely because it detected everything as an object, like debris/headlights/shadows, so it was less choosy and less likely to drop an object once detected.

I would love to see an on-board analytic shoot between Pelco, Axis, Samsung, Bosch etc..

The placement of bars for calibration in you tests (see the "Axis Perspective Calibration" Figure) is certainly wrong because bars should be normal to the ground plane. Otherwise the data essential for calibration will be inaccurate. This is best seen with bars 1 and 2 drawn over the two cars. The bars should go along the front door vertical edge (which is not at all "vertical" in the picture).

I don't know if Axis has made a note of this fact in its manual but no calibration is possible with bars drawn at random.

The bars are not drawn at random. The bars you see on the cars were drawn along the door line from the roof to the ground as you point out. However, Axis snaps the lines to vertical after they're drawn, but they remain the same length. I measured the cars those lines were drawn on, as well, to be accurate.

The cars themselves don't appear level due to the angle of view. The FOV overall is level, though, as you can see the poles in the background are vertical.

Also, this scene was later recalibrated when I moved cameras back to this point for further testing.

For reference, Axis gives little guidance as to what is right/wrong in this calibration, nor any best practice in their manual.

Thanks for your clarification. Really strange that Axis "snaps" the bars to vertical... No way to double check the bars had been drawn correctly.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,366 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how much are integrators selling them? 220 integrators answered the...
IP Camera Browser Support: Who's Broken / Who Works on Dec 10, 2019
For many years, IP cameras depended on ActiveX control, whose security flaws have been known for more than a decade. The good news is that this is...
Verkada Favorability Results 2019 on May 29, 2019
Verkada has taken the industry by storm with the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever and a half billion dollar valuation....
Hikvision Silent on "Bad Architectural Practices" Cybersecurity Report on Nov 14, 2018
A 'significant vulnerability was found in Hikvision cameras' by VDOO, a startup cybersecurity specialist. Hikvision has fixed the specific...
Cloud Video Storage Usage 2018 on Oct 31, 2018
Storing email and documents in the cloud have long been common, with on-site email or file servers increasingly eliminated. However, what about...
Axis Guard Suite Video Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2018
In 2015, we declared Axis' Guard Suite analytics "weak", with missed detections and false alerts common. But after nearly 3 years and a 2.0 version...
Failed Retail Video Analytics Startup Analyzed on Dec 19, 2017
Most manufacturers in this industry try hard to cover up failure. But an industry startup backed by Silicon Valley's most prestigious accelerator...
Hikvision Upgrade Breaks ONVIF VMS Integration on Oct 31, 2017
Hikvision IP cameras using ONVIF for VMS integration will break when upgrading to Hikvision new 5.5 firmware, IPVM testing has verified. This...
PTZ Usage Declines 2017 - Statistics on Jul 03, 2017
PTZ usage is declining, now at ~6% of all cameras integrator use, down from ~10% of cameras used in 2014, according to new IPVM...
Remote Access (DDNS vs P2P vs VPN) Usage Statistics 2017 on Mar 30, 2017
Cyber security concerns are escalating, even in the video surveillance industry which has historically lagged in its attention here. A key...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...