Axis Beats Patent Troll

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Jun 05, 2013

Axis has beaten one of the biggest and most powerful patent trolls, landing an important victory for the surveillance industry. Two years ago, Walker Digital filed suits against Axis and other security manufacturers. Now, the key 1998 patent that provided the foundation for the suit has been overturned by the US government, according to the decision obtained by IPVM and the case has been dismissed.

This helps all manufacturers (and by extension integrators and users) as entities like Digital Walker seek to extract licenses across industries for fundamental functions.

Much of Walker Digital's case hinged on the 1998 patent (6720990) as it was the predecessor to the other patents in the case. Unfortunately, most parties being sued settled with the company before the patent office determination was made. 

Here is a breakdown of what happened with the manufacturers sued:

Tyco 

Court records show that the case against Tyco was dismissed in 2012. Counsel for Tyco says there was an agreement between the two parties. “There was a licensing agreement, but beyond that it’s confidential,” a company lawyer said by phone.

OnSSI

OnSSI entered into a licensing agreement with Walker Digital, according to court documents and confirmed by its lawyers.

Axis

Axis was the only company in this suit to leave the case without any kind of a settlement with Walker Digital. The two parties agreed to dismiss the case in February after Axis challenged the patents at the U.S. Patent and Trademark office.

"The case was dismissed with prejudice," Axis says. "While that usually means a settlement, the plaintiff (Walker Digital) had major setbacks in that two of the patents have been declared invalid by USPTO after a reexamination requested by Axis." Axis originally filed the request last April. 

Note: The entire record of the reexamination can be found on the USPTO's Patent Application Information Retrieval system using the case's control number: 90/020,001. 

Other Companies

In 2011, Walker Digital also sued ADT, Westec and Iveda Solutions over several remote monitoring patents.  

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

  • Claims against ADT and Westec were voluntarily dismissed by both parties. 
  • According to financial documents from Iveda, it paid a one time legal fee to settle the case [link no longer available] and entered into a licensing agreement with Walker Digital. The company would not disclose the terms of the agreement.

Major Patent Overturned 

Patent 6720990: According to patent office documents dated May 29, 2013, all 44 claims of this patent were rejected, and the patent was declared invalid. 

Patent 7593033: All 18 of the claims in this patent were reexamined and all were rejected, according to USPTO documents from March.

Patent 7817182: Walker Digital requested a reexamination of this patent and the request was denied for failure to meet certain requirements.

Patent 7605840: Last October, this patent was reexamined by the USPTO and was upheld. 

White House Actions 

The US government is now taking action against what many are calling the 'patent crisis' - a threat impacting a broad range of technologies. We recommend reading the full White House June 2013 Report on Patents and Innovation [link no longer available] for the government's extensive analysis and proposed actions.

There are 2 key elements involved that can impact surveillance:

  • Stopping patent trolls from 'hiding'
  • Stopping patents are that overly broad / vague

The Canatelo case is an excellent example of a mysterious company suing many surveillance manufacturers. Even after our investigation, the best we can tell is the company is based in a non-existent unit in a beachfront residential condominium in Puerto Rico.

However, even more important is the efforts to cut down on overly broad / vague patent claims, which repeatedly are the cause of ridiculous issues - whether its patents that cover all of remote video monitoring or sending emails on motion detection or tripwires or any type of calibration, etc.

The White House explicitly calls out this risk:

 "Functional claiming involves claiming exclusive rights over any device that performs a given function, regardless of how that function is performed. Functional language can therefore lead to very broad and/or vague claims. These problems are especially acute for software patents."

That's exactly the issue that patent lawsuit after lawsuit in surveillance rests on - claims so broad (and typically obvious even at the time of 'invention') that everyone falls under it.

They draw out an important distinction:

"PAEs take advantage of uncertainty about the scope or validity of patent claims, especially in software related patents because of the relative novelty of the technology and because it has been difficult to separate the “function” of the software (e.g. to produce a medical image) from the “means” by which that function is accomplished."

Object Video's position on calibration - that their patent covers all calibration - manual and automatic - is an excellent example here of this problem.

Finally, and importantly, the White House notes the overall lose to society referencing a study:

"During the years they were being sued for patent infringement ... companies ceased all innovation in that technology, causing sales to fall by one-third compared ... the financial reward received by winning PAEs amounted to less than 10% of the share value lost by defendant firms, suggesting that the suits result in considerable lost value to society from forgone technology transfer and commercialization of patented technology"

Technologies like video analytics certainly had enough problems, even before the OV lawsuits, but innovation and new entrants have nearly ground to a halt. Add this to the need now to pay OV a couple of dollars per analytics enabled camera for the next decade or two, and it gets even worse.

What's Next

It's great to see that Axis used their muscle to fight back against this but the evidence of the case shows that defendant manufacturers did not effectively coordinate.

The good news is that finally the US government may be getting serious about helping real manufacturers fight back against patent trolls. Nonetheless, the manufacturers really need to join forces against a very serious and common threat. 

Comments (18) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Arcules CEO Retracts False GDPR Claim + Dahua and Milestone Claims Examined on Dec 03, 2019
Arcules CEO has retracted a false claim about his organization being a "fully compliant GDPR company" after IPVM reporting (Arcules CEO Threatens...
France Declares School Facial Recognition Illegal Due to GDPR on Oct 31, 2019
France is the latest European country to effectively prohibit facial recognition as a school access control solution, even with the consent of...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
Cisco Settles False Claims Act Suit For Video Surveillance Vulnerabilities on Aug 01, 2019
Cisco entered the video surveillance market in 2007 and suffered for many years through a variety of its own errors and arrogance. The conclusion...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
First Video Surveillance GDPR Fine In France on Jul 08, 2019
The French government has imposed a sizeable fine on a small business for violating the GDPR after it constantly filmed employees without informing...
Nortek and SDS Fight Over Failed Settlement on Jun 05, 2019
Distributor SDS said they reached a deal with Nortek but Nortek says no settlement was reached and the suit is still on. In this post, based on...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Pivot3 Mass Layoffs on Mar 27, 2020
Pivot3 has conducted mass layoffs, the culmination of grand hopes, a quarter of a billion dollars in VC funding, and multiple failures to gain...
Athena CEO Criticizes 'Deplorable' 'Nitpicking', IPVM Refutes on Mar 27, 2020
Athena Security's CEO Lisa Falzone has strongly objected to IPVM's reporting on Athena, calling it 'deplorable' and repeatedly criticizing IPVM's...
Hikvision Admits Sanctions Harming Its Financial Performance on Mar 27, 2020
While Hikvision initially downplayed being sanctioned for human rights abuses, the company is now admitting a significant impact in a new PRC...
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30 series cameras, claiming to deliver "sharp video quality even in poor...
Coronavirus Shuts Down ADT Door Knockers on Mar 26, 2020
Coronavirus has another victim - this time, alarm giant ADT has stopped all door to door sales. Door knockers are a critical but controversial...
Access Control Course Spring 2020 - Save $50 Last Day on Mar 26, 2020
Register Now - Spring 2020 Access Control Course. Today, March 26th is the last day to save $50. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access...
Convergint Coronavirus Cuts on Mar 25, 2020
One of the world's largest security integrators, Convergint, has made a major move to handle the impact of coronavirus, with cuts across the...
VSaaS 101 on Mar 25, 2020
Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS) is the common industry term for cloud video. But what does it mean? How does it all work? Inside this...
TVT / InVid Facial Recognition Tested on Mar 25, 2020
Facial recognition is frequently sold for thousands of dollars per channel but some China manufacturers are offering full facial recognition...
IPVM Launches On-Demand Courses on Mar 24, 2020
For nearly a decade, IPVM has been a leader in online live courses. Now, we have added on-demand versions for all courses. The same course...