Axis 4K Tested (P1428E)

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Oct 29, 2014

[UPDATE August 2015: We recently updated firmware on this camera for an upcoming test, from 5.55.5.1 to the new 5.80.1. In doing so, WDR increased significantly, with shadowed areas more visible than previously tested. This October 2014 test has been updated inside.]

Two years ago, Axis declared the megapixel race over.

Now, they are among the first to release a 4K (8.3MP) camera. However, the question is simply: do we really need more pixels?

We bought an Axis P1428-E, to see what advantages and drawbacks it has compared to existing multi-megapixel cameras.

[****** ****** ****: ** recently ******* ******** ** this ****** *** ** upcoming ****, **** *.**.*.* to *** *** *.**.*. In ***** **, *** increased *************, **** ******** areas **** ******* **** previously ******. **** ******* 2014 **** *** **** updated ******.]

*** ***** ***,**** ******** *** ********* race ****.

***, **** *** ***** the ***** ** ******* a ** (*.***) ******. However, *** ******** ** simply: ** ** ****** need**** ******?

** ****** ****** *****-*, ** *** **** advantages *** ********* ** has ******** ** ******** *****-********* cameras.

** ****** ** ******* an ******* ** **,***** ***, *** ****' ******* *** ***** ******* *** *** ** performs ** ******** ****** and ***** ******.

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

**********:

  • ******** ********* ******* ** ******* and ***** **** ***** multi-megapixel ******* ** **** lit **** ******.
  • **** ********** ****** ****** the ***** ** **** than **** ******* (**** vs ****) ******* ******* lower ***** ***** (*** Axis ** ** **:*, compared ** **** **** are * ****** *:*).

*** *****:

  • **** *********** ** ~* lux, **** **** ***** and ******* ***** ****** legible, *** ** ****** details ** **** *******. Both *** ***** *** Bosch ********* *** ******* details ** **** ******* and *****.
  • ** ****** ****** ** ~0.1 ***, ***** **** the ***** *** ***** starlight *** ******* ********* and **** ***** **********.

***:

  • **** *** *********** ******* strong ********* *** ** images ** ******* ********** in **** **** ****** open ****.
  • [******: *** ** *** firmware, *** *********** *** increased ** *** **** area ** *** *** scene, **** *** ******* and ***** ******* ******* in *** *******.]

***** ****:

  • ** ****** *********** ** FPS ** **** **********, compared ** ~** ** most **** ********* *******.

*********:

  • ****** ********* *********** ** all ******* ****** ** our ****** *** ****** scene ** *** * light ****** (****** ** usable ****** **** ******** on *** ~*.***).
  • ******** ***** **** **** 1080p *** ******* **** cameras ** **** ************ scene, ****** ****** **** the ***** ********* *** model **** ************ ** 5 ***.
  • ** ** *** ** the **** ************ *****, bitrates **** ~**% ****** than *** ***** **** Q1615 *** ***** **% ***** than *** ***** *** starlight *****.

*******

*** **** *****-* ******** about$*** *** ******, **** ********* **** ****' own ****-*** **********-* *****(~$*,*** ******) *** ******* ** ******* multi-megapixel ****** **** ** the **** ******* *********** (~$*,*** ******) ** *** ******** ***** ******(~$*** ******)

** **** ** *** first ** ****** ***** readily *********, ** ****** yet ** ******** ** other ** *******.

***************

***** *** ******'* ********** moderate price ***** *** ******* 5MP+ *********, *** **** driver *** ******** **** be *** ** ****, evenly ***** *****.

*** ******* *********** **** be *** ******'* ********** poor *** ***** *********** and *** **** **** WDR ***********. **** ****** weigh ******* ** ** outdoor ****** **** ********** suffer **** **** ******.

*** *** ****** **** image *******, ***** *** / *** ***** ******* like****' *** *****,******** ****** *,**** *** *,******* ******* ***, ***. **** ****** be ****** **** **** only * ****** ******** in ******* *** ****, well, ****** ***** ***** of ***.

Market *********

**** **** ***** ***************, outside ** ********* *********, generally ***** **** ** found ** *** **** ** *** ** HD ********. *** ************* (******** *** ************** *** ******* *********) have **** **** ** address *** ***** *********** above **** ** ***** resolution, ** ** ******* the *** *********** *****.

Physical ********

**** ***** ******* *** physical ************ ** *** P1428-E, * ********** *** outdoor ****** **** ****** for ****.

Narrow ***** ** ****

** ***** ****** *** P1428-E ******* ***** ***** megapixel ******* ** * relatively ****** ***** ** view, ***** **' ****, at ******** ***** ******.

**** *****, ~*****

** **** *****, *** cameras ******* ****** ******* of *** ******* *** due ** **** **** PPF ****** *** ****** lighting. *** ***** *** Arecont ******* *** ******* similar ** ***********, ******* down ** **** * on *** **** *****.

** **** ****** *** cameras *** ***** ******** at **** ***** ***** to *** *** ******** advantages ** *** ** camera. While *** *****-* *** closest ** *** ********* chart, ** ******* *** major ***** ************ ****** in **** *****. *** Axis ***** *** ***** NBN-80052 **** **** ******** desaturated.

*** *****, ~***

** *** *****, ***** 1 ***, *** *****-* only ***** ***** ******* of *** *******. **** the ***** *** ***-***** show ****** *******, ***** the ******* **** ******** no ****** *****.

**** (~*.***)

** ~*.* ***, *** P1428-E ******** **** **** slight ********* ** *** subject *** *****, ***** the ******* ******* ***** produce ** ****** *****. The **** ***** *** Bosch ***-***** ***** ******* some ******* ***** ** the **** *****, ****** subject ******* *** ********.

Wide ***** ** **** 

** ******* *** ********** field ** **** ** about **', ***** ***** strong ****** ********, ~*** lux.

*** **** *****-* *********** the **** ******* ** this ***** **** **** subject ******* *** ********** of *** *****. *******, **** the ****** ********** ** light **** **** **** a ******** ****** ** the *****'* ***** *******, with *** **** *** Q1615 ********* ******* ****** details ** * ******, despite *** ***** **** of *** ** ******.

*** ***** *** ** the ********* ********* ** this ***** *** ** increased *** *** ****** dynamic *****. ** ****, it ******** ********** ****** details ** *** *******, though ***** ***** ** the **** ***** (*/* vs. */* ** *** Axis *****-*).

Wide ******* ***** 

** ****** *** *********** against ****** ******** ******* an **** ******** **** and *** **** **** next ** **, **** here ** *** *****-*:

*** *****-* *** *** worst ********* ** *** WDR **** *****, **** poor ******* ** *** subject ******* ****** *********, while ** *** ********** undetectable ** *** **** area **** ** *** overhead ****. 

Sample ******

***** *** ******** ***** from ***** ****** ******, taken ** **** *********** between *** ** *****-* and ***** *****-********* *******.

**** ************

** **** *****, ******* were ****** ** *** corner ** * **** intersection, ******* ******* *** pedestrian *******. **** ***** was ******** ** ** FPS **** ** ******* frame **** ******, ******* the **** **** ********** of *** *****-*. ******* this ** *** **** Arecont *******'* *** ***** rate ** * ***, which ** ********* ** maintain, ********* *-* ***. ******** **** ***** (***** Windows .***)

******** *******

**** **** ***** ****** performance ** * **** interior *******. *** *** width ** ***** **' at *** *******'* ******** location.******** **** ***** (**** Windows .***)

 

*********

*** *****-* *** *** lowest ********* ** *** camera ****** ** *** indoor **** *****, *** was ****** **** ** the ***** *** ****** measured ** *** **** outdoor ************. **** ** especially ******* ***** ** is ** *** ********** of *** ***** **** Q1615. 

*** ************ ***** ** 5 *** **** ************ standardized ** ***.

************ *********

** * **** ************* scene, *** *****-* ***** ahs *** ****** ******* at * ***. *******, changing ** ** *** ** *** capable ******* (*****-*, *****, and ***-*****) *** *****'* bandwidth ********* ****** *** Q1615, ** ***** **%. It ** ***** ***** than *** ***-*****, *******, which ********* ************ ** **** 15 **/* ** **** scene.

5.80.1 ******** ****** ************

***** ******* *** **** P1428-E *********, ** **** since ******* *** ****** firmware ***, ********* ** the **** ***** *****, the *** ** ** follows:

**** *** ** ********* in *** ***** ********** below, **** *** *** firmware (*.**.*) ** *** left ******** ** *** old ******** (*.**.*.*) ** the *****. *** **** portion ** *** ***** has ******** *************, **** our ******* *** ***** clearly *******.

*******, *** ** ***** an ***** ** ****** areas, **** *** ***** overexposed *** ********* *** our *******'* **** ****** in ********.

Test **********

*** ******* **** ****** using ******* ******** ***** from ******* ***** (************ to */*** ***), ********* (set ** *), *** compression (************ ** ~*** as ***** *****).

*** ******** ******** **** in **** ****:

  • ******* *********: *****
  • **** *****-*: *.**.*.*
  • **** *****: *.**.*.*
  • ***** ***-*****-**: *.**

***** *.*.*.***** *** **** *** recording.

Comments (10)

Howdy! Fine addition to the chart with the expanded eye rows. Along the same lines, I was thinking it might be more than helpful to see a thumbnail of the original uncropped image in the chart, just to show the FOV's. What with all these different aspects and lens options possible... Whaddya think?

Jim:

I guess..all these compared model equipped with vary focol lens so the tester can adjust the FOV to same level to compare, and for bullet type..usually the lens cannot be changed...

Yup, they are probably vari-focal for the reason you state, but if all the sensors aspect ratio (active pixels) is not the same, then they must have different FOV's, I reckon. But of course you can make at least the HFOV's the same, so that the PPF(h) numbers in the closeups jive.

Still I think its good to see the individual FOV's (when different), just because it helps you gander what each camera would get you. In this here other topic about 1280H sensors and what-not, see toward the end where the two actual non-distorted FOV's are shown, one-two. I hadn't realized that the two FOV's were that different because when you size-up the 1280x720 to the 'xtra-wide' version of 1280H, instead of the 4:3, they seem pretty close.

The difference here is that there is no non-standard aspect ratio like 1280H. Cameras are mostly 16:9, with one 4:3 (the Arecont 10MP).

The 16:9 cameras are all set to the same field of view, which is the sample we provide above the comparisons.

They're all set to this within a tight margin. The Arecont AV10115, being a 4:3 resolution, adds to the vertical FOV only, both top and bottom (we center all the cameras vertically so the "horizon" matches).

Because of that, the Arecont's coverage area is larger vertically. Whether 4:3 or 16:9 is "best" is a separate discussion, and a topic we covered elsewhere. We match horizontal field of view because it's the right way to measure relative performance of the same coverage area.

Sir, I do and did agree with you its the right way to set the FOV's for the comparison, here:

But of course you can make at least the HFOV's the same, so that the PPF(h) numbers in the closeups jive.

On the other hand if I was interested in buying the Arecont camera I would sure want to know that what its actual FOV was, wouldn't you? That's all I'm saying.

Back to the Axis: It would seem that this here is a 16:9 physical sensor. Or do you suppose its a 4:3 where 4MP of pixels are always dark?

Weak read levels for this report, not a good sign for 4K.

Last week, in the first 12 hours, Hikvision HDTVI had 600 reads. Yesterday, in the first 12 hours, H.265 chip had 500 reads.

Today, in the first 12 hours, Axis 4K had just 300.

[Btw, first week reads for Axis 4K are on target for ~3,000, far less than HDTVI or H.265 chip.]

This continues a trend we are seeing of weak interest in 4K and softening interest in Axis.

Excellent test Jon, and very clear, usable data. One remark and one question. The remark is that 4K has a premarket reputation for being expensive. Could that help account for the low interest so far? Question. I THOUGHT I had read that 4K is similar to HD in that everything in the system has to be 4K. Or is that just monitors? Could you clear that up a little. By the way, just my naked eye opinion, but the Bosch wins this round.

"I had read that 4K is similar to HD in that everything in the system has to be 4K"

That's a permutation of the argument Do Not Use Cameras With Higher Resolution Than The Monitor Displaying Them.

If the monitor is less than 4K, than you cannot see all the pixels of a 4K camera on screen at once. If the monitor is less than 1080p, you cannot se all the pixels of a 1080p camera, etc.

That said, if there is greater detail / better image quality, that will easily be seen when digitally zooming in, whether it is live or recorded. For example, in the comparison shown above, we have digitally zoomed in so you can 'see' the additional pixels and whether they make a difference.

As this is the first 4K camera model readily available, it cannot yet be compared to other 4K options."

Bosch also released the Dinion Ultra 8000 4K UHd camera.

We asked Bosch multiple times when and if it was shipping (recall they were the first to announce 18 months ago). Everytime for the last year, Bosch would say that another delay occurred. I am no sure if it is shipping yet. We will eventually do a 4K shootout with multiple vendors and will consider testing it then.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Hikvision DeepinView Camera Analytics Tested on May 08, 2019
Hikvision is expanding its 'deep learning' offerings with a new camera series called 'DeepinView' claiming false alarm reduction and improved...
Registration Closed - Spring 2019 IP Networking Course on May 02, 2019
Register now for the Spring 2019 IP Networking course here - Closed. Last chance now.   This is the only networking course designed specifically...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...
Amazon Ring Public Subsidy Program Aims To Dominate Residential Security on May 20, 2019
Amazon dominates market after market. Quitely, but increasingly, they are doing so in residential security, through a combination of significant...
LifeSafety Power NetLink Vulnerabilities And Problematic Response on May 20, 2019
'Power supplies' are not devices that many think about when considering vulnerabilities but as more and more devices go 'online', the risks for...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Inside Look Into Scam Market Research on May 17, 2019
Scam market research has exploded over the last few years becoming the most commonly cited 'statistics' for most industries, despite there clearly...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact