Axis, Canon and the Hedge Fund

By: John Honovich, Published on Apr 28, 2015

Canon 'owns' Axis. However, a hedge fund is causing pains for the companies as it attempts to profiteer from the technicalities of closing the acquisition and delisting Axis.

In this note, we explain what Canon has already acquired, and why Canon is trapped and must close the deal, even if dragged out.

***** '****' ****. *******, a ***** **** ** causing ***** *** *** companies ** ** ******** to ********* **** *** technicalities ** ******* *** acquisition *** ********* ****.

** **** ****, ** explain **** ***** *** already ********, *** *** Canon ** ******* *** **** close *** ****, **** if ******* ***.

[***************]

The ***** **** ******

* $** ******* ***** ****,******* **********, ****** **** * way ** **** * short **** ******. ******* say **** **** ******** 10.9% ** **** *****.

Canon ** **%

*******, ******** ************* **** ******* ******** 84% ** **** *****, so **** **** *** more **** * ******** of **** ******.

*** ******* ** **** they **** **% ** use * ******** '******* ***' ********* ** ******* the ********* ****** *** Elliott *** **.*%, ******** this.

Deal ***** ** ******

******* ***** **** ***** from ****, *** *** Canon / **** **** is ****** ********* ***** to ******.

**** *** *** *********:

***** ********

**** ** ***** *** technically **** ***, ***** they ******* ***** **%, selling ***** ****** ***** cause * ***** ******* million *** **** ***********, as *** ***** ***** would **** **** **** to ***-***** ****** ** worse, ** ***** **% lower **** **** **** are *** (******* ** Canon's **% ******* *****).

******* **** **** ****

******** ** *** ***** (and *** ******) ** spend $*+ ******* ****, as * **% ******* (for *** ******* $*.* billion *****) ** ******* an ********** ***** (** not ********** *** * company **** ~$*** ******* annual ******* ***** ******).

**** ****** *** **** Complications

***** ** ** *********** impossible *** ***** ** just **** **** *** highly ******** **** ******* will *** **** ****, the **** ** ***** to *****. ******* ** takes **** ****, ******* Elliott ***** * ****** but ***** ** ** other ****** *********** **** for ***** ** ******** the **** ****.

Comments (10)

Ouch... Talk about a squeeze play. I guess it proves that there's always an 'angle' to make a buck on any deal.

It's the financial equivalent of those who squat on domain names.

Talk about a Bluebird sale! I'm drooling over the commission somebody is about to make. And what a blunder on Canon's side to not see this in advance! They could have gone to Elliott a long time ago and got those shares first. (Or maybe they did? That would be even more interesting!)

Canon is used to the old "squeeze the squeezer" tactic, and may have hoped to prevent it, but certainly considered it. You may recall we discussed an earlier Canon acquisition, Oce, back when the tender offer was made. In that deal, a fund had also refused to sell, causing the closing to be delayed for 4 years!

During that time Canon still apparently ran Oce, and once they finally came to terms, the deal closed.

@Bob, even assuming Elliot had many or most of its shares before the tender offer was made, which is unclear, Elliot would not have had to sell them. Nor could Canon have just started buying up Axis on the sly in preparation for the tender either, as at every 5% increase in ownership of a public company in Sweden has to be reported.

One side effect is that Axis may not be allowed to delist until Canon gets the 90%, according to this Swedish attorney.

This means that Axis could continue to report their financials publicly in the interim.

Richard Berger of Canon Global had this to say recently:

With the settlement on April 15 for the 75.46 percent of the shares that had been acquired following the initial acceptance period, which concluded on April 1, Axis has already become a Canon subsidiary. While it would have been preferable to obtain 100 percent of the shares, having a minority of the shares owned by other parties does not pose an obstacle to our strategy going forward... [The] synergies are not affected by costs but rather lie in the opportunities going forward, we are confident that we will be able to realize the synergies of the deal.

What a weird move by the hedge fund.

Now that Canon controls Axis (85% of shares), they have cancelled Axis' traditional periodic dividend payment to shareholders.

However, Elliott submitted a proposal to disperse ~98% of profits as a dividend. Obviously, this is not going to happen since Canon controls the board / shares.

However, Elliott submitted a proposal to disperse ~98% of profits as a dividend.

Elliot is looking for the highest short-term return, hence highest dividend. Anyway they are not asking for any bigger dividend than Axis board already had twice announced. They announced it even after the tender offer announcement and said that it would reduce the offer price that Canon would pay by the same amount.

I'm not sure I'm following your 98% number, how did you derive it?

I understand Elliott's motivation but it's a little like me asking for you to buy me a Tesla. I guess I can ask but the chance of you saying yes is nil, correct?

As for 98%, Elliott proposed, "a dividend of SEK 6.00 per share shall be paid to shareholders - SEK 416,767,500, to be carried forward - SEK 5,937,306"

...but it's a little like me asking for you to buy me a Tesla.

If you can afford $0.40 kW/h, you can afford the car. :)

I agree with your math but what do you make of this? They are showing 2014 as a 5.50 krona dividend, not 6.00. Mind you this is pre-Elliot.

Yet they never seem to be anywhere near the 33% mark in recent history.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact