Awards Benefit Manufacturers -- Not Users

Author: John Honovich, Published on Sep 05, 2009

Awards assist manufacturers in selling products rather than identifying the best solutions for user's needs.

This is a growing concern as the number of awards are increasing substantially. This month [September 2009], both ASIS and Security Products jump into the awards game.

General Problems with Awards

A number of important problems with awards should be recognized:

  • Judging criteria is vague or non-existent (judges can choose whatever they think is 'best')
  • No testing of the actual products are performed
  • Information used to judge is limited to data sheets and marketing materials
  • Entrance is often constrained to those willing to pay the fees or buy a booth at the exhibit
  • No information is ever provided on why the awardee won and the other participants did not
ASIS Accolades
 
ASIS promotes its new Accolodes award program as "an incredible marketing opportunity that will give [vendor's] valuable exposure and recognition."
 
Vendors submit basic product information and answer 4 questions. Judges review the submissions and then pick winners.
 
While the submission fee is only $250 USD, only exhibitors may enter (which usually a minimum of $8,000 USD for a booth) [see entrance rules].
 
ASIS states this benefits security professionals by helping them identify new and innovative offerings. Certainly, the mission of ASIS is to increase "the effectiveness and productivity of security professionals." However, how does limiting awards to only exhibitors help security professionals?
 
And why did ASIS choose BRS Labs - a company that has zero public proof of their extremely difficult claims?
 
And where is the public explanation of why these companies were selected and others were not? Just a list of companies? Would not security professionals benefit from greater information and details on strengths and weaknesses?
 
Security Product Magazine Awards
 
Security Products is running a "Product of the Year" awards program. In this program, there are 7 award categories [see entrance form]. [Update 9/16: An earlier version stated that there were 43 categories based on an e-mail I received from Security Products. In a new message, Security Products states there are only 7].
 
The Security Prodcut "awards will be given at the discretion of the judges" without any criteria provided.
 
In its media kit, Security Products clearly states their objective is to be, "the marketing partner that [vendors] can depend on to help generate leads and increase sales." With so many awards and such little objective criteria, this program accomplishes that.
 
Integrators and Users Must Speak Out
 
These programs exist because they can take advantage of the trust that people have in the honesty of others.
 
If each of you raises questions or objections when manufacturers brag about these awards, these awards will go away. Nothing motivates manufacturers more than the fear of losing business. 
 
We Need Meaningful Awards
 
Awards can be useful if they measure criteria that are meaningful to users. For instance, best camera in low light (measured at a specific lux level, F stop, object reflexivity, etc.) or best tripwire detection (measured based on FAR, FRR, ROC, etc. in specific weather, lighting and environmental condiitons).
 
Measure what's meaningful and publish the details so everyone can see and verify.
 
Until we do this, we are basically choosing the fastest swimmer by looking at photos of people in their underwear.

1 report cite this report:

Riskiest Companies 2009 - BRS Labs and TimeSight on Sep 09, 2009
BRS Labs and TimeSight are likely the riskiest video surveillance companies. With extensive marketing campaigns and multiple awards received from...

Related Reports

Panasonic Unified Surveillance Strategy Analyzed on Nov 17, 2017
Panasonic is now a "Unified Surveillance" offering, as their ASIS 2017 booth proclaimed: Looking to make a comeback in the security industry,...
Dahua Forbes 'Next Web Crisis' Vulnerability Dispute on Nov 16, 2017
The buffer overflow vulnerability in Dahua products is not in dispute, in fact we covered it when it was first published. What is in dispute is...
Hikvision China Criticizes The WSJ on Nov 15, 2017
Hikvision, through the Chinese government's authoritative news service, has criticized the WSJ investigation into Hikvision. In this...
WSJ Investigates Hikvision on Nov 13, 2017
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) has released a detailed investigation into Hikvision's government ownership and cybersecurity problems, hitting the...
Honeywell Crowdfunding Bombs on Nov 08, 2017
100,000+ employees and $40,000,000,000 in annual revenue. That's Honeywell. ~200 backers and ~$67,000 in funding in a week. That's Honeywell...
Dahua USA Removes Head of Marketing on Nov 06, 2017
Dahua USA's marketing and just their overall business organization has been a mess. These guys could not sell life jackets on the Titanic. But,...
Ingram Micro: The Blind Lead The Blind on Nov 02, 2017
Ingram Micro, as a huge as they are overall, with $40+ billion in annual sales, has never been a force in physical security, despite, or perhaps...
The Milestone Personal Demo Marketing Campaign on Oct 30, 2017
Waste of money or emarketing innovation? In a program being heavily promoted on their social media channels Milestone is offering to...
Hikvision Admits Backdoor 'PR Issue' on Oct 24, 2017
Hikvision is admitting a problem. The backdoor itself is evidently not the problem for them. The problem, according to Hikvision, is a public...
Long Time Industry Exec Leads New Security Franchise Offering on Oct 12, 2017
John Nemerofsky previously built and sold a $150 million dollar integration business, and then was VP of Niscayah from its spinout of Securitas,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Panasonic Unified Surveillance Strategy Analyzed on Nov 17, 2017
Panasonic is now a "Unified Surveillance" offering, as their ASIS 2017 booth proclaimed: Looking to make a comeback in the security industry,...
Amazon Cloud Cam Is Poor (Tested) on Nov 17, 2017
Retail behemoth Amazon has entered the surveillance market with the Amazon Cloud Cam, the eyes of its just-announced Amazon Key delivery...
Nest Secure Alarm System Tested on Nov 16, 2017
Google's expansion continues, this time into home security with their Nest subsidiary's move into alarm systems. They paid more than a...
Dahua Forbes 'Next Web Crisis' Vulnerability Dispute on Nov 16, 2017
The buffer overflow vulnerability in Dahua products is not in dispute, in fact we covered it when it was first published. What is in dispute is...
Isonas Cofounders Split, Launch Partner/Competitor on Nov 16, 2017
Breaking up is hard to do, especially when door access security is at stake. But that is exactly what has happened at Isonas. Senior employees...
Hikvision China Criticizes The WSJ on Nov 15, 2017
Hikvision, through the Chinese government's authoritative news service, has criticized the WSJ investigation into Hikvision. In this...
Axis Commits To Long-Term Firmware Support on Nov 15, 2017
With the rise of cyber security awareness, and a general increase in hardware reliability, "software warranties" may prove more valuable than...
Hikvision NVR 4.0 Improvements Tested on Nov 14, 2017
Hikvision has released firmware version 4.0 for select NVRs, touting two years of research and development, and claiming "the new generation GUI...
Vivotek Remote Stack Overflow Vulnerability on Nov 14, 2017
A stack overflow vulnerability in Vivotek cameras has been discovered by bashis, the security researcher who has also found vulnerabilities in...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact