Avigilon Wastes $39 Million on Stock Buyback

By: John Honovich, Published on Jul 14, 2015

Avigilon is investing - in their own stock.

Over the past 2 months, Avigilon has spent nearly $40 million buying back their own stock.

In this note, we examine:

  • How they have 'profited' $22 million doing this
  • Why they undertook this endeavor
  • How this impacts their future growth plans

******** ** ********* - in ***** *** *****.

**** *** **** * months, ******** *** ***** nearly $** ******* ****** back ***** *** *****.

** **** ****, ** examine:

  • *** **** **** '********' $22 ******* ***** ****
  • *** **** ********* **** endeavor
  • *** **** ******* ***** future ****** *****

[***************]

Profited $**+ *******

** ****,******** ****** $*** *********** *********, ******* **** shares ** $** ****. Now, ******** ****** *.* million ****** **** ****** investors ** ** ******* price ** $**.** *** share, ********** **** $** of '******' *** ***** and * ***** ** more **** $** *******.

** ******, ** *******, Avigilon's ***** *********, ******** this ***********. ***********, ****** money *** ** ***'* investors ** * **** long-term ********.

*******, ** ******** ** making ***** *** ****, Avigilon *** ******* *** number ** ****** *********, which *********** ******** ******** per ***** **** ** total ******* ****** *** same.

But ****** *****

*******, *** ***** ** trading ** ~$**.** ** November ****, ***** **% lower **** **** **** bought *** ****** ** the ******. **** *** further ***** ***** *******, the ********* *** *** stop *** **** *** Avigilon *** *** **** funds *** ********* ** other ********.

Why **** ********* ****

******** ** ******** **** against ***** ******* ***** price. **** **** ******* the ***** ***** *** under $**, **** **** stopped *** *** *** to *** ** ******* requirements, *** ***** *** ~$18.50. *****, *** ***** is ~$**.**, ** ***** in *** ***** ******* below:

** *** ******** ****, it ********* *** ****** stabilize *** *****.

Growth ******

******** *** $** ******* in ****, ** ****** ** ** ****. *******, ******** ********** * $*** ******* credit *************** **** ****, ****** $80 ****** ******* **** to **** *** *********** purchase.

*** ~$** ******* ********* cuts *********** **** ***** former '********' *** ****** future ***********. ****, ***** the ******* ** ***** price *********** ********** ******, ******* *** ****** would ** **********.

Q2 *******

**** ** *** ********'* Q2 *******. ***** **** they ***** ~$** ******* buying **** ***** *****, they ****** *** * great ******* ** **** they **** ******* ***** share ***** *******.

****** - ** ******* moderately ************ *********. ***: ******** **** ******* ******** - ** ****

Comments (10)

Undisclosed #1

07/14/15 03:39pm

Given that they spent ~$40 million buying back their stock, they likely had a great quarter...

You know, of course that if they bought the stock back because they knew they were going to have a 'great' quarter, as you seem to imply, it would likely be considered insider trading and therefore illegal?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 07/14/15 03:44pm

That's not my understanding especially since the rules prohibit buy backs before the end of the quarter (when a company would know for sure what the exact numbers were).

There's nothing here that I understand violate any rules.

I am simply saying that committing to such a purchase implies that they are confident that results are going to be good. But who knows, maybe they are trying to buy time. We'll see when the results are announced.

I would personally be surprised if the numbers were not much better than last quarter, given this initiative.

Eric Fleming Bonilha

In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 07/30/15 02:30pm

Well.. I guess that they definitely knew they would have a great quarter... So.. is this an Insider Trading?

http://avigilon.com/press-tools/press-releases/avigilon-corporation-reports-record-second-quarter-2015-results?hootPostID=70f6ddf01e68dc263415a5ddd72cc1d4

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Eric Fleming Bonilha | 07/30/15 02:32pm

No, not insider trading at all.

Also, stock price is down this morning after the results were released, so evidently not that great of a quarter.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to John Honovich | 07/30/15 03:06pm

Apparently they missed the street earnings estimate by a nickel...

But this is a good example of where they certainly could have gotten in trouble had they decided to buy at the precise moment they did because of knowledge that wasn't public yet.

Something like the patent enforcement program being announced...

Itamar Kerbel

07/15/15 06:02am

A company that buys back it stock is simply stating that it belives that the stock is undervalued.

If they have a great quarter it says that they are right.

Undisclosed #1

07/16/15 05:31pm

That's not my understanding especially since the rules prohibit buy backs before the end of the quarter (when a company would know for sure what the exact numbers were).

Do you know exactly what day the trading was stopped because of the coming end of the quarter? IMHO, it would appear that it didn't stop until at least the opening bell of the 29th of June.

Here's why:

2,100,000 - 360,000 = 1,740,000 (Total shares sold minus shares sold by 5/21)

17,740,000 / 66,726 = 26 days (Shares to sell / max. daily volume)

There are only 28 trading days between 5/22 and 7/1 (exclusive).

28 - 26 = 2 days.

IMHO, June 29 is therefore the earliest date they could have stopped, and that's assuming were able to trade the absolute maximum everyday since May 21.

Do you agree and/or do you have any detail regarding the schedule of the 2.1 million shares?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 07/16/15 05:40pm

Yes, I reviewed the schedule of buybacks - last day in June they bought was June 22nd.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to John Honovich | 07/16/15 05:43pm

Is that a public document/can you share?

I'm curious if they exceeded the supposed daily limit or if one of my numbers is wrong.

Undisclosed #1

07/17/15 06:23pm

FWIW, it's unlikely that they stopped when they did because of end of the quarter blackout requirements for two reasons.

  1. End of quarter blackouts for the TSX typically extend from 1 week after the end of the quarter to 1 day after results are reported.
  2. They were permitted to buy even during blackout periods using their designated broker thru pre-determined programmatic trades which may take weeks to execute and are generally irrevocable.

They are of course not allowed to buy, nor create a programmatic broker buy, while in possession of any non-public material information.

Therefore assuming that these rules were followed, the fact that they bought $40 million at this point should not indicate a better quarter than the street is already expecting.

But I like you am expecting a 'great quarter'.

On another note it appears that they may be able to exceed their 66K volume restriction once a week with block trading. If you have the dailiy volumes in front of you, you may be able to check that.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Vivint Valuation Falls $1.5 Billion on Dec 19, 2019
Residential market struggles continue. Now, Vivint's valuation has fallen $1.5 billion in its impending merger. Inside this note, we examine...
Resideo CEO To Step Down on Dec 03, 2019
Resideo's CEO, Mike Nefkins, is stepping down, just 18 months after being brought in to lead the now plagued spin-out. Inside this note, we...
NetPosa Revenue Plunges 90% on Nov 04, 2019
Revenue for China's long-time largest VMS provider NetPosa plunged 90% in the latest quarter, adding to the firm's serious financial...
Resideo Stock Plunges 37%, CFO Ousted on Oct 23, 2019
The horrible year for the ADI / Honeywell Home spinout, Resideo, just got worse, with their stock plunging another 37% today. Not even a year...
Knightscope Sells Just 1 Net New Robot In 6 Months on Oct 04, 2019
For the first half of 2019, US government records show that Knightscope has sold just 1 net new robots ('machines-in-network'), inching up from 52...
Genetec Beats Milestone For IHS #1 on Jun 21, 2019
For years, Milestone has touted that they are the #1 VMS. Now, Genetec has beaten them in IHS rankings. But what is this? Even other manufacturers...
OpenALPR Doubles Prices on Jun 06, 2019
There is no 'race to the bottom' in cloud / AI video surveillance. In May, Verkada increased their prices. Now, OpenALPR is doing the same with a...
Knightscope Adds Just 2 Total Customers In Past Year, Yet Raising Money at $300 Million Valuation on May 02, 2019
This is no longer funny. While Knightscope has laughed it up promoting robot selfies, joking about a 'suicidal robot', the man who attacked a...
Verkada Gets Half Billion Dollar Valuation on Apr 26, 2019
Last week, when we profiled Verkada (The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada), we predicted they would raise $40...
Brinks Home Security / ASCMA Risks Bankruptcy on Apr 08, 2019
ASCMA, aka MONI, aka Brinks Home Security has issued a warning in their most recent financials that they risk bankruptcy. In this note, based on...

Most Recent Industry Reports

IPVM's 12th Anniversary - Thank You! on Apr 07, 2020
IPVM is proud to celebrate it's 12 anniversary expanding our commitment to providing the industry independent and objective information on video...
Mobotix Thermal Body Temperature Detection Examined on Apr 07, 2020
Mobotix has jumped into the Coronavirus temperature detection market, but how do they compare to thermal incumbents like FLIR or ICI who have been...
Verkada Coronavirus Response: Free Temp Systems For Government and Health Care on Apr 07, 2020
Verkada has built a reputation on giving away things for free - free Yeti Tumblers, free trial cameras and now free temporary systems for...
Hikvision USA Refuses, Dahua USA Drives Forward With "Coronavirus Cameras" on Apr 07, 2020
Both have been federally banned, both sanctioned for human rights abuses but only one - Dahua - is taking aim at the booming "coronavirus cameras"...
China Surveillance Vulnerabilities Being Used To Attack China, Says China on Apr 07, 2020
While China video surveillance vulnerabilities have been much debated in the West in the past few years, China is now saying those vulnerabilities...
USA ICI Elevated Skin Temperature Detectors Examined on Apr 06, 2020
Infrared Cameras, Inc. (ICI) is aiming to help slow the spread of COVID-19 with "pinpoint accurate skin temperature measurement" using their...
Trade Groups Request NDAA Blacklist Delay Citing Coronavirus on Apr 06, 2020
Two trade groups representing government contractors have asked Congress to delay implementation of the NDAA's 'blacklist' clause from this August...
Coronavirus Hits Manufacturers, Standing Now, Worse To Come on Apr 06, 2020
Coronavirus is hitting security manufacturers, though overall modestly for now, with worse expected to come, new IPVM survey results...
FLIR New Coronavirus Prioritized Temperature Screening Camera Examined on Apr 03, 2020
FLIR has announced a new series of thermal cameras "prioritized for entities working to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 virus", the A400/A700...
ADI Branch Burglary on Apr 03, 2020
A security systems distributor branch is an odd target for burglary but that happened this week at ADI's Memphis location. Vehicle Smash &...