Avigilon Wastes $39 Million on Stock Buyback

By: John Honovich, Published on Jul 14, 2015

Avigilon is investing - in their own stock.

Over the past 2 months, Avigilon has spent nearly $40 million buying back their own stock.

In this note, we examine:

  • How they have 'profited' $22 million doing this
  • Why they undertook this endeavor
  • How this impacts their future growth plans

******** ** ********* - in ***** *** *****.

**** *** **** * months, ******** *** ***** nearly $** ******* ****** back ***** *** *****.

** **** ****, ** examine:

  • *** **** **** '********' $22 ******* ***** ****
  • *** **** ********* **** endeavor
  • *** **** ******* ***** future ****** *****

[***************]

Profited $**+ *******

** ****,******** ****** $*** *********** *********, ******* **** shares ** $** ****. Now, ******** ****** *.* million ****** **** ****** investors ** ** ******* price ** $**.** *** share, ********** **** $** of '******' *** ***** and * ***** ** more **** $** *******.

** ******, ** *******, Avigilon's ***** *********, ******** this ***********. ***********, ****** money *** ** ***'* investors ** * **** long-term ********.

*******, ** ******** ** making ***** *** ****, Avigilon *** ******* *** number ** ****** *********, which *********** ******** ******** per ***** **** ** total ******* ****** *** same.

But ****** *****

*******, *** ***** ** trading ** ~$**.** ** November ****, ***** **% lower **** **** **** bought *** ****** ** the ******. **** *** further ***** ***** *******, the ********* *** *** stop *** **** *** Avigilon *** *** **** funds *** ********* ** other ********.

Why **** ********* ****

******** ** ******** **** against ***** ******* ***** price. **** **** ******* the ***** ***** *** under $**, **** **** stopped *** *** *** to *** ** ******* requirements, *** ***** *** ~$18.50. *****, *** ***** is ~$**.**, ** ***** in *** ***** ******* below:

** *** ******** ****, it ********* *** ****** stabilize *** *****.

Growth ******

******** *** $** ******* in ****, ** ****** ** ** ****. *******, ******** ********** * $*** ******* credit *************** **** ****, ****** $80 ****** ******* **** to **** *** *********** purchase.

*** ~$** ******* ********* cuts *********** **** ***** former '********' *** ****** future ***********. ****, ***** the ******* ** ***** price *********** ********** ******, ******* *** ****** would ** **********.

Q2 *******

**** ** *** ********'* Q2 *******. ***** **** they ***** ~$** ******* buying **** ***** *****, they ****** *** * great ******* ** **** they **** ******* ***** share ***** *******.

****** - ** ******* moderately ************ *********. ***: ******** **** ******* ******** - ** ****

Comments (10)

Given that they spent ~$40 million buying back their stock, they likely had a great quarter...

You know, of course that if they bought the stock back because they knew they were going to have a 'great' quarter, as you seem to imply, it would likely be considered insider trading and therefore illegal?

That's not my understanding especially since the rules prohibit buy backs before the end of the quarter (when a company would know for sure what the exact numbers were).

There's nothing here that I understand violate any rules.

I am simply saying that committing to such a purchase implies that they are confident that results are going to be good. But who knows, maybe they are trying to buy time. We'll see when the results are announced.

I would personally be surprised if the numbers were not much better than last quarter, given this initiative.

Well.. I guess that they definitely knew they would have a great quarter... So.. is this an Insider Trading?

http://avigilon.com/press-tools/press-releases/avigilon-corporation-reports-record-second-quarter-2015-results?hootPostID=70f6ddf01e68dc263415a5ddd72cc1d4

No, not insider trading at all.

Also, stock price is down this morning after the results were released, so evidently not that great of a quarter.

Apparently they missed the street earnings estimate by a nickel...

But this is a good example of where they certainly could have gotten in trouble had they decided to buy at the precise moment they did because of knowledge that wasn't public yet.

Something like the patent enforcement program being announced...

A company that buys back it stock is simply stating that it belives that the stock is undervalued.

If they have a great quarter it says that they are right.

That's not my understanding especially since the rules prohibit buy backs before the end of the quarter (when a company would know for sure what the exact numbers were).

Do you know exactly what day the trading was stopped because of the coming end of the quarter? IMHO, it would appear that it didn't stop until at least the opening bell of the 29th of June.

Here's why:

2,100,000 - 360,000 = 1,740,000 (Total shares sold minus shares sold by 5/21)

17,740,000 / 66,726 = 26 days (Shares to sell / max. daily volume)

There are only 28 trading days between 5/22 and 7/1 (exclusive).

28 - 26 = 2 days.

IMHO, June 29 is therefore the earliest date they could have stopped, and that's assuming were able to trade the absolute maximum everyday since May 21.

Do you agree and/or do you have any detail regarding the schedule of the 2.1 million shares?

Yes, I reviewed the schedule of buybacks - last day in June they bought was June 22nd.

Is that a public document/can you share?

I'm curious if they exceeded the supposed daily limit or if one of my numbers is wrong.

FWIW, it's unlikely that they stopped when they did because of end of the quarter blackout requirements for two reasons.

  1. End of quarter blackouts for the TSX typically extend from 1 week after the end of the quarter to 1 day after results are reported.
  2. They were permitted to buy even during blackout periods using their designated broker thru pre-determined programmatic trades which may take weeks to execute and are generally irrevocable.

They are of course not allowed to buy, nor create a programmatic broker buy, while in possession of any non-public material information.

Therefore assuming that these rules were followed, the fact that they bought $40 million at this point should not indicate a better quarter than the street is already expecting.

But I like you am expecting a 'great quarter'.

On another note it appears that they may be able to exceed their 66K volume restriction once a week with block trading. If you have the dailiy volumes in front of you, you may be able to check that.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Uniview Prime Series 4K Camera Tested on Sep 18, 2019
Is the new Uniview 'Prime' better than the more expensive existing Uniview 'Pro'? In August, IPVM tested Uniview 4K 'Pro' but members advocated...
US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Manufacturers Unhappy With Weak ASIS GSX 2019 And 2020 Shift on Sep 16, 2019
Manufacturers were generally unhappy with ASIS GSX, both for weak 2019 booth traffic and a scheduling shift for the 2020 show, according to a new...
How Cobalt Robotics May Disrupt Security on Sep 13, 2019
While security robots have largely become a joke over the last few years, one organization, Cobalt Robotics, has raised $50+ million from top US...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...