Arecont Favorability Results 2017

By: John Honovich, Published on Jan 25, 2017

Given Arecont is 3 time defending integrator choice for worst camera manufacturer, it should be little surprise they had the lowest score in the integrator Favorability series.

Integrators detailed why they dislike Arecont, and comments indicate that while Arecont have won some battles improving product perception, they are still losing the overall war.

***** ******* ** * **** defending ********** ****** *** ***** camera ************, ** ****** ** little surprise **** *** *** lowest ***** ** *** integrator Favorability ******.

*********** ******** *** **** dislike *******, *** ******** indicate **** ***** ******* have *** **** ******* improving ******* **********, **** are ***** ****** *** overall ***.

[***************]

Arecont *******

******* *** *** ******* negative **********, *** *** lowest ******* ***** (* factor ** ******** **. negative *****):

*** ******* *** **** were ******* ** ******** integrator ******** ** *******: poor ******* ******* *** reliability ******.

Failure *****

***** **** ****** ******* cameras ***** **** ******* of ******* ******** *** quality ******, ******* ************* are ********* ********* ** having ******, ***** ******** in *** ******* ******. Here, ******* ******** *******, with *********** ********* * variety ** ******* ********, both ** ***-**-*** ******* and ********* *******.

  • "*. ******* ***** *** high *** ***** ** the ***** ***** ********. There *** **** ** major ******* ** ******* these *****. *. ******* seem ** ** ************ / *** *** ********** (low ********* ************, **** bitrates / ****** *********** bitrate *********) *. *** our ********* **** ********* them ****** *** **** 5 ***** **** ***** on *** **** ******** opinions ** ****."
  • "****** ** **** *********** problems."
  • "**********. ******* ** **** when **** ****, *** the ******* **** ** high ******** ** ***** brands."
  • "* **** * **/** opinion ** *******. ***** quality ** **** **** once * ****** ** set **. * **** had ******** ** *** past **** *** *** up ******* ******. *** failure **** ** ***** cameras *** *** **** in ** *******, ** well."
  • "*** ******** **** *************, faulty ******* *** ** send ****. ****** *** much ****."
  • "***** ********** ** *****. Most ** *** ****, reputations *** ******. * do **** ********* **** swear ** ****, *** most ***** ** ****. Their ******** ** **** a **** **** ** return ***** ** ******* out ** ** ******."
  • "**** **** **** **** little, *** **** * first ******* **** * cameras *** ******* *** (20%)"
  • "**** ********** **** *******. Poor ****** *******, **** product ************* *** ********* support. ***** ******* *** unreliable ***********. **** ******* all ******* ********* ** previous ***** *** * few."
  • "** **** ********* ***** 30 ** *** ***** sensor ****, ***** ******. We **** *** ** replace ** ***** **** and **** *** ********* service *****. ** **** not **** **** *** longer."
  • "**** ********, ********** ******** but **** *** * poor ********** **** ********* failure *** ******* **** software."
  • "** **** **** **** in *** ****. ** have *** *********** ******** out ** *** *** and ******* ***** ***** a *** ******. ***** issues ** **** *** is ********* *** ********* on ******** *******."
  • "***** **** *** *********** specs, ******* ******** ***: 1) **********. *** **** DOAs. *) ** * camera *****, ***** ** often, ******* ** ******** or ******** ********* ***** years. *) **** ******* usually ****** **'* * VMS *******. *) ********* they **** **** ****** the **** **** ********* can *** ***** *** Arecont ***** ** ***** the ******** **** **** they ******* ** ** the ***********."
  • "******** **** ***** ** products. ******* ******* ******* in *** ***** ** learn **** **** ************ incorrectly. ******* **** ****** replacements *** ***** ** no ************ *** *** lost **** *** ***** which ** ***** ** make *** *****. **** has ****** ******* ** our **** *** **** us **'* ** ********* of ******* ** ***** lost ** ******** *** to ******** *********** ****."
  • "** **** *** * higher ******* **** **** the ***** ** ****** with ******* ******* **** with ***** ****** ** use. ***** **** ****, they **** * **** selection ** ******** *** the ***** ******* ** great." 

Product *******

*** *** *********** ******** outright ********, *** **** others ***** ******* ****** that ******** ** ******* performance ** ******* ****** that *** ** ******** feedback.

  • "**** ******** ****** ******* quality ******* ****** (****** showing ******* ******, ***.)"
  • "****: **** **'** ******* replaced *** ******** ** Arecont ******* ** ********* installed. *******: **** **, poor **** *******, **** sales *******."
  • "**** **** ***** *******, but *** *********** ****** continue ** *** * bad ***** ** *** mouths ******* ** ****** other, **** ******** *********."
  • "** *** ****** ** Arecont * ****** ** years *** ******* ** BAD ******* ******. **** not **** **** ** about * *****. *** a *** ****** ***** customer ******** ** *** Arecont ** * ******* in ***** ** *** protest. ** ******, *** got ** ******* ** that ** ***** ****** extra ** * *&* basis ** ****** *** Arecont ******** ******. **** ended ** ****** ** over $*** ** ****** due ** ******* ******** during *** ***** * months ***** ************."
  • "*** *** **** *********. Not ********* **** *******."
  • "******* ******* *** ******** from ******** ***** *** still ****. ** *** used ** *** ******* levels ** ****, ****, Panasonic *** ******* **** not ******* **. ** have * ****** ** customers *** **** *** Arecont, *** ** ** were *** *** **** we ***** *** *** it ** ***."
  • "******* *** **** ***** quality, *** ** ******** to ******* *** ** quality ******* ******."
  • "** ******* **** **** our **** * *** years *** ******* ** the **** ******* *** tech ******* ******. ** would **** ****** ** get **** ******* ****** resolved. *** **** ********* on **** ** *** cameras ***** ***** ***** and ******** *** ******** was * **** *********."
  • "***** ** **** *** There ****** ***** ** be ** ************ ** focusing ***** ********** *** electronically **** **** ****** better ***** **** *** US *****."
  • "**** *** ********** **** multi ****** **********. *** rep *** *******. *** channel *** ************."
  • "** ******* ***** ******* heavily ******* ***** ***. Then ******* ****** ********* and ** *** *** many ********. ** **** never ****** ****. *** only **** ** **** consider ******* ** *** multi-imager *** ** ***."
  • "******* ******** **** *** multi-head *******. **** ** communication *** *** ******* problem. **** *** ***** the **** ** *** everything ** * ****** enclosure."
    • "**** ******* *******. **** low ***** *******. ******** they **** * **** looking ******** *** ********. It **** ***** **** they ****** *******."
  • "**** ** ******* *******. Their ******** *** *** highest ******* **** *** of *** ***** ******* we **** ** **** dealt **. **** **** don't **** **** **** competitive *** ***** ***** of *******. "
  • "** *****-******, ***** **** is *** ***."
  • "**** * ***** **** in *** ***, * feel **** **** **************."
  • "****** **** **** **** the ***** * **** had **** *** ****** with ****...**** ***** **** their **** ***** ***** and *** ********* ** other ***** ****** ***** makes **** **** **********...* do *** *** ***** standard ** *******."
  • "*'** **** ********** **** one ******* ***** ****** camera. ** ****'* * terrible ******, *** * was ************ *** ******** I've ****** ** **** has **** ********** *****'* have ***** ****** ** say."
  • "** *** * ******* where ** *** ********* difficult ** ****** * good ****** *** ********* lighting ********* - ** was ****** **********, ***** ch ****'* **** ** the **** **********. **** then ** ***, ***** is **** **** *********** with ****** ******** ** better ******."

Down, *** *** ***

***** **** **** *********** comments *** *******, *********** giving **** * ****** chance, ** ****** ******** expereinces. 

  • "**** ** ***** ****** solutions ****** ** **********."
  • "* *** ******* ********** where * **** ************** images. **** **** **** good ******* *** ********** price. **** * **** "Sorroundvideo" *******, **** *** good ****** ** *** need ** *** *** and *** ***** *****."
  • "** *** ****, ******* had ******* *** ********* issues. **** * *** a *** *****, * tend ** **** **** from * ******* *** a *****. ********, ** have ******* ***** **** of *** *****-****** ******* from *******. ** **** allowed *** *** *********/******* requirements. * **** **** the ******* **** **** and ***** ** ** the ******* **********. ** so, ** **** ***** using **** *******."
  • "*****: **** ***** *******. Multisensor ******* ******* *** game, *** *** ********** to *******. ********** *****-***** for ********. ********: ****** quality -- **** *** some ******, ******** **** one ********. ********* ** a *** ******. ******** bandwidth ****."
  • "******** ** *** **** they **** *** ****** with ******* ********** ****** things *** ******* **** well. **** *** **** active ** ****** ****** things ***** **** *** integrations."

Lack ** **********

******* *** *** **** industry-leading ********, ***** *** ***** *.*** MP ****** ********, *** *** ***** with quad-sensor ** *******. *******, integrators **** ***** ** comment **** ******* ** no ****** **** ** an *********. **** **** companies *** ******** *****-****** products, *** ******* ***** so **** ** *** smart ***** ****, ****** perception ** ****** ****** offerings ***** ** * significant ****.

  • "******* ** **** *******. An **** *** ** the ********** **** ** the ********."
  • "**** ** ***** *** after ***** ******* ** the ****** ** *** primary ******* ***** ******* Arecont ******* *** ** the *** ** **** the ******* ***'* ***** any ******** ******* **** others ***'*."
  • "**'* **** ****** ***** I ****** ******* *** I ** *** ****** off ** ***** ******** negative ******* *** ***** products *** ** ****** ahead ** *********** ** multi-sensor ******* ** **** functionality *** *******"
  • "** **** ***** **** Arecont ******* ******* ***** to ** ****** **** the ***** ******* *** there. ***** ****** ** the ******* ** **'* just *** ******* ** have *** ***** **** of."
  • "* ***'* ****** **** anything ***** *******. ***** imaging ** *** ***********, their ***** *****'* **** to ** ***********, *** their ********** *** ***. We've *** ******** **** quality ** *** ****, and ** *****'* *** any ****** (**********, *****, added *****) ** **-******** them ***** ****."

Outlook *** *******

******* ************ ********* **** product ******* ****** *** negative ******** **** **** integrators. ** ******** ***** their **** ********* *** ***** near ******** ** *****-****** cameras, *** *** ****** of ***** ******** ** certain ************. *******, **** multi-sensor ******* ******** **** of ***** ***** ************* portfolio, ******* ** ****** a *********** ********* ****. The ******* **** ***** to ******* ******* ***-***** performance, *** **** *** a ***** ***** ** the ******** ** ***** portfolio **** ** ***** up ** ******* *********. Unlike ***** ************* **** use ******** **** ***** players **** ********* ** HiSilicon, ***** **** *** get * **** ******* of ***** ************ **** the *******, *******'* **** approach ******** **** ** develop ********** ** *****.

*** ***** *******, ** expect ******* ** ******** to ******** ** *** market, ***** ** ********* another ******-******** ******* **** has *** **** ****** their *****-****** ********* *******.

Comments (8)

I think Arecont does continue to innovate. Once other people starting releasing 180 multisensor cameras, they came out with the Omni. First the multi-sensors did not have remote focus, now they do. Then they released the Flex and the Duo series. They've had a pretty robust line of micro form factors for awhile now and lots of options for "inbetween" sizes like 3MP and 5MP and 10MP.

Maybe that's the problem. More dollars go into designing new stuff and the product quality side looses out because of not enough funding. I wonder how many integrators thought, "They didn't work well before, but now they have this new neat camera, and maybe because it's new they improved the quality this time." Quality fails, they are out of favor again, release next toy to regain interest, rinse and repeat.

I think Arecont does continue to innovate... First the multi-sensors did not have remote focus, now they do. Then they released the Flex and the Duo series.

#1, that is a good point and I agree with you about the innovation within multi-imagers.

I think the challenge for Arecont is that there's only so far innovation within multi-imagers will take them with. Multi-imagers are a good niche but will always be a niche product as for cost reasons or application / design choices, single imagers will remain the most common choice.

The other issue is the ill-will Arecont has brought upon itself. A story on that. An integrator was asking me about using the Axis Q3709 and I told him that we tested it and found it performed poorly. I actually suggested he consider Arecont but he flat shut me down because of his own past poor experiences with Arecont.

I have used Arecont 180 and 360's on several jobs. Some in critical infrastructure applications. I saw them as the "Panoramic Pioneers" a few years ago, but lately have been discouraged by the continuity of the picture across the imaging sensors. The browser interface seems archaic and the menu screens for the different options actually impedes viewing of the live image. Additionally, when compared to other products like Pelco, their scene stitching is almost laughable, despite being able to adjust the "sensors" through software.

They have always seemed to work out-of-the-box for me, but Arecont seems content with what was good a few years ago being passable now. I do not see major innovation.

Low frame rates, I can handle, it is part-and-parcel with high-resolution cameras, especially in the panoramic line. 

John Honovich:

Would you and the IPVM staff ever consider doing a "teardown" of some cameras, similar to what iFixit does when a new iPhone is released?

 

I have a suspicion that Arecont uses extremely underpowered image processing chips in their cameras, leading to poor framerate/bitrate control. 

 

I think it would be fun to round up several similar cameras from varying manufacturers, crack them open, and try to identify the chipsets contained inside. 

 

I suspect we'll see some manufacturers using some very old, cheap, and underpowered imaging chipsets in their surveillance cameras. Might be fun to look at the wholesale price of these chips and do a cost comparison (i.e. which camera has the most powerful imaging chips, for the cheapest prices).

I'm sure there would be some dealers willing to donate out-of-warranty or non-returnable cameras for that venture if specific models were requested. A camera that took a lightning hit or water damage might have enough parts intact for close examination.

We actually have planned to do this and started some teardowns. It's on my list of things to do, but other reports have taken priority. It's still coming, just not 100% sure when it'll be released.

I find it completely absurd and unreasonable that Arecont cams aren't capable of providing a secondary stream -- you can get either full or half size, that's it.  You can request the rez of the stream you want, but the camera doesn't scale -- it will just take a portion of the field of view corresponding to your X by Y rez request.  A 12MP camera even at half size will overwhelm many embedded display devices, such as automation system touchpanels.

I have made multiple attempts to contact someone from Arecont in an attempt to help me better understand their technology of the multi-imager cameras. My requests have been unanswered through their website email and BOTH the Director of Federal Programs & Mid-Atlantic and the Regional Sales Director - Mid Atlantic & Southeast.  I will be recommending to the Government agency I support to use a different, more responsive manufacturer.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Camera Resolution Usage Statistics 2020 on Mar 12, 2020
The average resolution used, for new cameras, is now 4MP, according to new IPVM statistics, continuing the rise that we have mapped from 2014,...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2020 on Jan 20, 2020
The past 2 years of US bans and sanctions have shaken the video surveillance industry but what impact would this have on integrators' favorite...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
Ranking Manufacturer Favorability 2019 on May 06, 2019
24 manufacturer's favorability was ranked based on 170+ integrators feedback. Voting plus in-depth comments revealed insights on which brands were...
Top Hikvision Proponent Nelly's "GoSwift" Elsewhere on May 03, 2019
Sean Nelson [link no longer available] of Nelly's Security has made a name for himself and his company as a proponent of Hikvision, such as this...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
Dahua Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 01, 2019
Dahua favorability declined, in IPVM's 2019 integrator favorability series, driven by their backdoors, resulting in mass hacking and US government...
Panasonic Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 27, 2019
Panasonic favorability declined, as the company struggled to find its way amidst a changing market and its ill-timed decision to become a Dahua...
Lenel Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 26, 2019
The positive news for Lenel is that integrators do not dislike them as much as they used to.  The negative news for Lenel is that integrators...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Pivot3 Mass Layoffs on Mar 27, 2020
Pivot3 has conducted mass layoffs, the culmination of grand hopes, a quarter of a billion dollars in VC funding, and multiple failures to gain...
Athena CEO Criticizes 'Deplorable' 'Nitpicking', IPVM Refutes on Mar 27, 2020
Athena Security's CEO Lisa Falzone has strongly objected to IPVM's reporting on Athena, calling it 'deplorable' and repeatedly criticizing IPVM's...
Hikvision Admits Sanctions Harming Its Financial Performance on Mar 27, 2020
While Hikvision initially downplayed being sanctioned for human rights abuses, the company is now admitting a significant impact in a new PRC...
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30 series cameras, claiming to deliver "sharp video quality even in poor...
Coronavirus Shuts Down ADT Door Knockers on Mar 26, 2020
Coronavirus has another victim - this time, alarm giant ADT has stopped all door to door sales. Door knockers are a critical but controversial...
Access Control Course Spring 2020 - Save $50 Last Day on Mar 26, 2020
Register Now - Spring 2020 Access Control Course. Today, March 26th is the last day to save $50. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access...
Convergint Coronavirus Cuts on Mar 25, 2020
One of the world's largest security integrators, Convergint, has made a major move to handle the impact of coronavirus, with cuts across the...
VSaaS 101 on Mar 25, 2020
Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS) is the common industry term for cloud video. But what does it mean? How does it all work? Inside this...
TVT / InVid Facial Recognition Tested on Mar 25, 2020
Facial recognition is frequently sold for thousands of dollars per channel but some China manufacturers are offering full facial recognition...
IPVM Launches On-Demand Courses on Mar 24, 2020
For nearly a decade, IPVM has been a leader in online live courses. Now, we have added on-demand versions for all courses. The same course...