Arecont Bandwidth Savings Mode Tested

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Feb 14, 2014

How would like to reduce your storage costs by up to 50% with just a click of a button? That's the promise of Arecont's 'Bandwidth Savings Mode', a new option that slashes bit rate up to half 'with least impact on image quality.'

On the other hand, we are skeptical of such claims as often they are nonsense (e.g., DVTel's super low bandwidth cameras) and now that bandwidth consumption can vary dramatically (see our Advanced Camera Bandwidth Test Results).

However, such savings, if real, can be enormous so we put them to the test with Arecont's 3MP, 5MP and 10MP.

Two fundamental questions are answered:

  • How much bandwidth can I save by using this mode?
  • How does it impact image quality?

We used an indoor test scene:

And a low light scene:

Finally, we tested the cameras outside against moving vehicles:

Here are our the key findings from our test of Arecont's Bandwidth Savings Mode (BSM):

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

  • Turning bandwidth savings mode on resulted in bitrate reductions varying from ~12% to as much as 70% depending on the camera and scene.
  • However, Arecont's average bandwidth with savings mode off was significantly higher than competitive cameras (~10 Mb/s vs. ~3 for competitors in full light). Even with it turned on, bandwidth remained higher, approximately 6 Mb/s, though closer.
  • The big bandwidth savings came in low light, not from 'bandwidth savings mode' but from binning. Binning reduced pixel count by 75% but increased visible image quality and radically reduced bandwidth.
  • With bandwidth savings mode on, in color mode, all cameras desaturated to varying levels. While this resulted in a noticeable reduction in color fidelity, in only one case was a color unrecognizable (bright yellow displayed as white in the AV3116).
  • Some motion blur was introduced on a walking subject indoors with savings mode on. However, vehicles moving at 35+ miles per hour on a nearby road did not display any blur.


Bandwidth savings mode has little value since (1) even with it on, competitor cameras are still frequently lower and (2) it comes with clear desaturation (black and white effect). On the other hand, binning clearly is useful and competitively very rare.

Full Light Comparisons

In our indoor full light scene, bandwidth savings mode reduced bandwidth by about 30% on both the AV3116 and AV10115, while providing a reduction of over 70% in the AV5115. 

Below is a FOV image of our test scene in full light:

To see the impact of bandwidth savings mode on image quality, we began in our typical indoor test scene with a human subject and test chart. In this scene, desaturation is obvious, but there are no ill effects on actual details delivered in either our subject or test chart.

Testing color fidelity with a Macbeth test chart, we can see the full effects of desaturation. While all cameras experienced this, only the AV3116 had severe issues, with bright yellow appearing as white. 

Binning Mode

Aside from Bandwidth Savings Mode, users may further lower bitrate of Arecont cameras by turning binning mode on at night. This cuts resolution by 75% (1024x768 binned vs. 2048x1536 full resolution in the AV3116), improves bandwidth consumption, as well as low light performance. This image comparison from our previous test of the AV3116 shows this improvement in low light performance and bitrate:

Low Light Performance

In low light, we allowed our two day/night cameras to switch to monochrome, while the AV10115 stayed in color mode. Bandwidth reductions here varied from 35-66% with the AV5115 again seeing the most savings.

Note: bandwidth measurements of the AV3116 and 5115 were with binning on:

Below is a FOV image of our test scene in dark:

At ~1 lux, turning BSM dims images slightly but noise is reduced, presumably due to a decrease in gain. This reduces facial detail in the AV5115 and AV10115, where our subject's face is completely black. However, in the AV3116, the reduction in noise improves details of both subject and chart.

Motion Blur

We found that some blurring was introduced on our moving subject when BSM was turned on. This comparison shows these effects in full light, especially notable in the AV3116.

In low light this was also true. Note that all cameras were standardized to 33ms (1/30s) exposure in this scene.

Due to the blurring present indoors, we expected to see the same issues with faster moving objects, so tested the cameras on a nearby road. However, vehicles moving 30-40mph on a nearby road did not display any motion blur. 

Here is the FOV of our outdoor scene:


Notice how with bandwidth savings mode turned "on", the browns and greys have been subdued, turned black, and darkened, and while not completely desaturated, image quality is noticeably worse. As an example, look at the highway sign in both images, and notice how much greener the BSM Off image is compared to the almost black highway sign in the BSM On image.

Competitive Bandwidth Comparison

Bandwidth of the AV3116 is high relative to the average of other 3MP and 1080p WDR cameras. Turning BSM helps, reducing bandwidth to below that of the Sony SNC-VB630 and nearing that of the Avigilon H3 3MP, but it still remains higher than both Bosch and Samsung in this scene (even after factoring in modest differences between a 3MP and 1080p pixel count).

3 reports cite this report:

Video Surveillance Bandwidth Guide on Dec 16, 2016
Bandwidth is one of the most fundamental, complex and overlooked aspects of video surveillance. Many simply assume it is a linear function of...
Testing Axis Zipstream on Apr 13, 2015
Has Axis found its breakthrough differentiator? Can they demand a premium for this? Axis claims Zipstream can "lower bandwidth and storage...
Axis Zipstream Claims Average 50% Savings on Mar 25, 2015
Axis claims that its new Zipstream compression technology can "lower bandwidth and storage requirements by an average 50% or more." That is quite...
Comments (8) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming the "modular design allows for easy installation". We bought and...
IR Surveillance Camera Guide on Feb 06, 2020
Integrated infrared (IR) cameras are everywhere in 2020, but not all IR is created equal, with many differences in coverage, overexposure,...
Color Low Light Mega Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Speco, Sony, Vivotek on Nov 12, 2019
This is the biggest color low light shootout ever, testing 20+ super low light models from 10 manufacturers: Increasingly, each manufacturer...
Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) Guide on Oct 01, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
WDR Camera Mega Shootout 2019 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Sep 04, 2019
This is the biggest WDR Shootout ever, with 23 cameras from 8 manufacturers: We included true multi-exposure WDR and non-WDR models, ranging...
Hikvision 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 02, 2019
With their latest Smart Series 5 cameras, Hikvision is claiming cameras "fully loaded" with "state-of-the-art technology for high performance and...
Hanwha 4K Wisenet P Camera Tested on Jul 30, 2019
Hanwha claims "premium performance" and to "deliver the best in high resolution performance and efficiency" with their Wisenet P series 4K models,...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...

Most Recent Industry Reports

FLIR New Coronavirus Prioritized Temperature Screening Camera Examined on Apr 03, 2020
FLIR has announced a new series of thermal cameras "prioritized for entities working to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 virus", the A400/A700...
ADI Branch Burglary on Apr 03, 2020
A security systems distributor branch is an odd target for burglary but that happened this week at ADI's Memphis location. Vehicle Smash &...
YCombinator AI Startup Visual One Tested on Apr 02, 2020
Startup Visual One, backed by Silicon Valley's powerful Y Combinator, aims to be "Your 24/7 Watchman" with advanced analytics and object...
Free IPVM Memberships For The Unemployed on Apr 02, 2020
IPVM is giving 3-month free memberships (regular price $99) for the unemployed, no questions asked. To get it, just contact us, your request...
Dahua Faked Coronavirus Camera Marketing on Apr 01, 2020
Dahua has conducted a coronavirus camera global marketing campaign centered around a faked detection. Now, Dahua has expanded this to the USA,...
Video Surveillance Trends 101 on Apr 01, 2020
This report examines major industry factors and how they could impact video surveillance in the next 5 - 10 years. This is part of our Video...
USA's Seek Scan Thermal Temperature System Examined on Apr 01, 2020
This US company, Seek, located down the road from FLIR and founded by former FLIR employees is offering a thermal temperature system for the...
Terrible Convergint Coronavirus Thermal Camera Recommendation on Apr 01, 2020
A week after Convergint disclosed falling revenue, pay and job cuts, Convergint is touting 'extensive research' that is either grossly incompetent...
The IPVM New Products Online Show April 2020 Opens With 40+ Manufacturers on Mar 31, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce the first New Products Online show, with 40+ manufacturers, to be held April 14 to the 16th, free to IPVM members,...