Arecont Bandwidth Savings Mode Tested

By Ethan Ace, Published on Feb 14, 2014

How would like to reduce your storage costs by up to 50% with just a click of a button? That's the promise of Arecont's 'Bandwidth Savings Mode', a new option that slashes bit rate up to half 'with least impact on image quality.'

On the other hand, we are skeptical of such claims as often they are nonsense (e.g., DVTel's super low bandwidth cameras) and now that bandwidth consumption can vary dramatically (see our Advanced Camera Bandwidth Test Results).

However, such savings, if real, can be enormous so we put them to the test with Arecont's 3MP, 5MP and 10MP.

Two fundamental questions are answered:

  • How much bandwidth can I save by using this mode?
  • How does it impact image quality?

We used an indoor test scene:

And a low light scene:

Finally, we tested the cameras outside against moving vehicles:

Here are our the key findings from our test of Arecont's Bandwidth Savings Mode (BSM):

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

  • Turning bandwidth savings mode on resulted in bitrate reductions varying from ~12% to as much as 70% depending on the camera and scene.
  • However, Arecont's average bandwidth with savings mode off was significantly higher than competitive cameras (~10 Mb/s vs. ~3 for competitors in full light). Even with it turned on, bandwidth remained higher, approximately 6 Mb/s, though closer.
  • The big bandwidth savings came in low light, not from 'bandwidth savings mode' but from binning. Binning reduced pixel count by 75% but increased visible image quality and radically reduced bandwidth.
  • With bandwidth savings mode on, in color mode, all cameras desaturated to varying levels. While this resulted in a noticeable reduction in color fidelity, in only one case was a color unrecognizable (bright yellow displayed as white in the AV3116).
  • Some motion blur was introduced on a walking subject indoors with savings mode on. However, vehicles moving at 35+ miles per hour on a nearby road did not display any blur.


Bandwidth savings mode has little value since (1) even with it on, competitor cameras are still frequently lower and (2) it comes with clear desaturation (black and white effect). On the other hand, binning clearly is useful and competitively very rare.

Full Light Comparisons

In our indoor full light scene, bandwidth savings mode reduced bandwidth by about 30% on both the AV3116 and AV10115, while providing a reduction of over 70% in the AV5115. 

Below is a FOV image of our test scene in full light:

To see the impact of bandwidth savings mode on image quality, we began in our typical indoor test scene with a human subject and test chart. In this scene, desaturation is obvious, but there are no ill effects on actual details delivered in either our subject or test chart.

Testing color fidelity with a Macbeth test chart, we can see the full effects of desaturation. While all cameras experienced this, only the AV3116 had severe issues, with bright yellow appearing as white. 

Binning Mode

Aside from Bandwidth Savings Mode, users may further lower bitrate of Arecont cameras by turning binning mode on at night. This cuts resolution by 75% (1024x768 binned vs. 2048x1536 full resolution in the AV3116), improves bandwidth consumption, as well as low light performance. This image comparison from our previous test of the AV3116 shows this improvement in low light performance and bitrate:

Low Light Performance

In low light, we allowed our two day/night cameras to switch to monochrome, while the AV10115 stayed in color mode. Bandwidth reductions here varied from 35-66% with the AV5115 again seeing the most savings.

Note: bandwidth measurements of the AV3116 and 5115 were with binning on:

Below is a FOV image of our test scene in dark:

At ~1 lux, turning BSM dims images slightly but noise is reduced, presumably due to a decrease in gain. This reduces facial detail in the AV5115 and AV10115, where our subject's face is completely black. However, in the AV3116, the reduction in noise improves details of both subject and chart.

Motion Blur

We found that some blurring was introduced on our moving subject when BSM was turned on. This comparison shows these effects in full light, especially notable in the AV3116.

In low light this was also true. Note that all cameras were standardized to 33ms (1/30s) exposure in this scene.

Due to the blurring present indoors, we expected to see the same issues with faster moving objects, so tested the cameras on a nearby road. However, vehicles moving 30-40mph on a nearby road did not display any motion blur. 

Here is the FOV of our outdoor scene:


Notice how with bandwidth savings mode turned "on", the browns and greys have been subdued, turned black, and darkened, and while not completely desaturated, image quality is noticeably worse. As an example, look at the highway sign in both images, and notice how much greener the BSM Off image is compared to the almost black highway sign in the BSM On image.

Competitive Bandwidth Comparison

Bandwidth of the AV3116 is high relative to the average of other 3MP and 1080p WDR cameras. Turning BSM helps, reducing bandwidth to below that of the Sony SNC-VB630 and nearing that of the Avigilon H3 3MP, but it still remains higher than both Bosch and Samsung in this scene (even after factoring in modest differences between a 3MP and 1080p pixel count).

3 reports cite this report:

Video Surveillance Bandwidth Guide on Dec 16, 2016
Bandwidth is one of the most fundamental, complex and overlooked aspects of...
Testing Axis Zipstream on Apr 13, 2015
Has Axis found its breakthrough differentiator? Can they demand a premium for...
Axis Zipstream Claims Average 50% Savings on Mar 25, 2015
Axis claims that its new Zipstream compression technology can "lower...
Comments (8) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video...
Quantum Dots Potential for Surveillance Cameras Explained on Sep 08, 2020
Quantum dots are starting to be used in TVs for better images, but how will...
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
Verkada 2020 Cameras Image Quality Test on Oct 06, 2020
Verkada's first-generation cameras suffered from numerous video quality...
YOLOv5 Released Amidst Controversy on Jul 27, 2020
YOLO has gained significant attention within video surveillance for its...
Breaking Into A Facility Using Canned Air Tested on Jan 28, 2020
Access control is supposed to make doors more secure, but a $5 can of...
HID Releases Lower-Cost Signo Readers on Mar 06, 2020
HID Global is releasing a new line of readers called Signo they claim read...
Vehicle & Long Range Access Reader Tutorial on Jan 21, 2020
One of the classic challenges for access control are parking lots and...
Dedicated Vs Converged IP Video Networks Statistics 2020 on Sep 10, 2020
Running one's video system on a converged network with other devices can save...
Uniview Color Low Light Camera Tested Vs Hikvision ColorVu on Jan 07, 2020
Hikvision has been marketing ColorVu aggressively. Now, Hikvision domestic...
Camera Calculator V3.1 Release Improves User Experience on Oct 17, 2019
IPVM has released a new version of our Camera Calculator, V3.1, with...
Costar Technologies / Arecont H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 16, 2020
Costar's financial results have been hit by the coronavirus with the company...
Drain Wire For Access Control Reader Tutorial on Sep 23, 2020
An easy-to-miss cabling specification plays a key role in access control, yet...
Remote Network Access for Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 27, 2020
Remotely accessing surveillance systems is key in 2020, with more and more...

Recent Reports

Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...
Dahua Revenue Grows But Profits Down, Cause Unclear on Oct 20, 2020
While Dahua's overall revenue was up more than 12% in Q3 2020, a significant...
Illegal Hikvision Fever Screening Touted In Australia, Government Investigating, Temperature References Deleted on Oct 20, 2020
The Australian government told IPVM that they are investigating a Hikvision...
Panasonic Presents i-PRO Cameras and Video Analytics on Oct 19, 2020
Panasonic presented its i-PRO X-Series cameras and AI video analytics at the...
Augmented Reality (AR) Cameras From Hikvision and Dahua Examined on Oct 19, 2020
Hikvision, Dahua, and other China companies are marketing augmented reality...
18 TB Video Surveillance Drives (WD and Seagate) on Oct 19, 2020
Both Seagate and Western Digital recently announced 18TB hard drives...
Watrix Gait Recognition Profile on Oct 16, 2020
Watrix is the world's only gait recognition surveillance provider IPVM has...
Intel Presents Edge-to-Cloud Ecosystem for Video Analytics on Oct 16, 2020
Intel presented its processors and software toolkit for computer vision at...
Microsoft Azure Presents Live Video Analytics on Oct 15, 2020
Microsoft Azure presented its Live Video Analytics offering at the September...
Worst Manufacturer Technical Support 2020 on Oct 15, 2020
4 manufacturers stood out as providing the worst technical support to ~200...
Clorox Announces, Then Pulls, Fever Camera on Oct 15, 2020
For almost one week, Clorox was marketing fever cameras. The booming...
Faulty Hikvision Fever Cam Setup at Mexico City Basilica and Cathedral on Oct 14, 2020
Donated Hikvision fever cameras (claiming screening of 1,800 people/min. with...
Directory of 211 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Oct 14, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...