Ambarella CEO Admits H.265 and 4K Not Popular

By: John Honovich, Published on Sep 26, 2016

Ambarella is the main chip provider for high-end surveillance cameras driving higher resolution and new CODECs. While Ambarella has been pushing both H.265 and 4K, Ambarella's CEO now admits neither are seeing strong adoption in the West.

In this note, we examine the admission and what this means for the future of the video surveillance market.

********* ** *** **** chip ******** *** ****-*** surveillance ******* ******* ****** resolution *** *** ******. While********* *** **** ******* both *.*** *** **, *********'* *** *** admits ******* *** ****** strong ******** ** *** West.

** **** ****, ** examine *** ********* *** what **** ***** *** the ****** ** *** video ************ ******.

[***************]

H.265 *** *********

*********'* *** **** [**** no ****** *********]:

******* ***** **** [*.***] is *** ******* ** all *** ** *** royalty ******. *** ** China ** ***** ****** that **** ******** ***** well ****** ******* *** a *** ** ****** are ***** **** ** for ******* ******** ***********. So * ***** **** HEVC ********** ** ***** market ****.

**** ******** ******* / *.*** ******** fees ****, ******* **** *** fee *** $*.** ** Western ********* *** ****** and $*.** ** *****. 

** ******* *** **** issues ********* *.*** ******** *** stronger ********* ******* ********* *.***, *** ****** **** supporting / ******** *.*** streams ** *****, *** royalty ******. *** ******* rates *** *** **** significant *** *.***, *** even ** *.*** ********* were **********,  *.*** ***** delivers **** ***** *** more *********** **** **** smart *.***.

******, **** ************* *** not ******** *.*** *******, with *** ** *** * largest ************* (*********, ***** and ****) ******** ***** H.264 *** ** *.*** in *** ****. ***** a *** ****** ****** manufacturers *** ********* *.*** (most ******* *********, ******* and *******), **** ****** a ******** ******** **** limited *** *******.

4K *** *********

***** ***** *** ******** on *.***, *********'* *** said:

** ***** ** *** 4K, ***** ** **** what * ***** *** is **** *********. ** even **** ********* ** much ****** **** *********** full ** *****. ** do *** **** *** trend *** *** ************ IP ******** ****** ** to *** ****** *****, because *** **** ** get **** ********** ** you *** ** [*************] and *** ********** ********** matters *** **** *******. So ** ***** ****** a ******** ****** ******* to ****** ***** ** start ****** **** ********* become **** *******. * think ** ** **** trend. ** ** *****'* seen * ** ***** the ********** ***, *** I ** ******* **** megapixel **** **** **** could ** * ********** part.

** ****** **** *** being *** **** ****** than **, **** *** more ********. *** ****** behind **** ** **** 4MP ******* **** ** cost only ******** **** **** 1080p **** ***** ** ******* are ********* *** **** expensive. ********, **** ********* do *** ******* **** from *** ******** ** resolution **** *** ** 4K, ********** ***** ** limitations ** *** *** low *****.

*** ***/*** ** **** two ** *** **** hyped ******** ************, *.*** and **, *** ****** to ****** * ***** for * *** *****.

Ambarella's **********

**** ** *** ***** for *********, ** ********* ******* on ******* *** ******* edge ** **********, ****** that *** ***** **** adopt **. ** *** extent **** ***** ***** with ***** **********, **** computing ******* ********* ******, the **** ********* *** differentiate ******. ****** ****, Ambarella ** ********** ** GoPro's ******** (***** **** notable ********).

*******, ********* ***** ********** in *** ************ ******** market ****** ** ****** in *** **** ******:

** *** ************ ** ******** ******, ** *********** * ******* ** ******** ** *** ***** **** ** ****** **** ****, ************* **** ********* ******* ** *** ***** ******, *** ** ********** ************* ********.

** * ****-****-**** *****, overall ******** ** *** IP ******** ****** **** modestly **** ************ ******** experiencing * ***** ******* offset ** ****** ****** in *** **** ******** market.

Comments (9)

Undisclosed #1

09/26/16 02:22pm

Interesting article, thanks.

A few comments

H.265 still delivers less value and more operational cost than smart H.264.

H.265 and smart codecs are not necessarily an either/or choice, though.

But in China we start seeing that HEVC standard being well widely adopted and a lot of people are using them in for Chinese internal consumption.

What's the reason that the huge domestic Chinese market is buying h.265 when smart h.264 is available, if not for licensing?

IPVM examined the HEVC / H.265 licenses fees here, finding that the fee was $0.80 in Western countries per camera and $0.40 in China.

I believe this is only HEVC Advance's fee, there is still the MPEG LAs patent pool to contend (or risk ignoring).

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 09/26/16 03:14pm

H.265 and smart codecs are not necessarily an either/or choice, though.

Sure, but once you go to H.265, you need to worry about VMS support and increased client decoding demands. With smart H.264, neither of these are concerns, as you know. Plus, since smart H.264 already massively decreases bandwidth consumption, the incremental savings for smart H.265 are not as meaningful.

What's the reason that the huge domestic Chinese market is buying h.265 when smart h.264 is available, if not for licensing?

Neither of us are experts in the local Chinese market but a few things insiders there have told us:

  • H.265 helps differentiate / block out smaller competitors, so the larger Chinese companies can push major buyers to require it, reducing competition from rivals who can not as quickly / easily obtain H.265
  • The greater prevalence of end-to-end solutions (i.e., cameras and recorders from same manufacturer) reduces the concern of VMSes not supporting it, which is still an issue in the Western open VMS market

Undisclosed Manufacturer #2

In reply to John Honovich | 09/28/16 11:08am

> Plus, since smart H.264 already massively decreases bandwidth consumption, the incremental savings for smart H.265 are not as meaningful.

True, the bitrate drop from "dumb" to "smart" is big for low-complexity scenes for both Smart H.265 and H.264. H.265 has further I-frame reduction that will be handy but most likely not as big a drop as smart vs. dumb in general.

However, in more complex scenes (e.g. subway station, PTZ camera) Smart H.265 could bring meaningful bandwidth savings over Smart H.264. With increasing complexity the difference between Smart H.264 and Smart H.265 will likely move toward the inherent technology advantage of H.265 vs H.264 of ~40-50%. There is no magic here and one can expect the Chinese guys to show this in their promotion.

Most smarts are adaptions to more strongly filter out non-moving areas and IPVM showed that a big Smart H.264 saving comes from increasing the GOP size. This works well for mostly static scenes, but not for scenes with much motion, and many VMSes don't seem to like it and expect one I-frame every second or so.

Hey, that maybe in your next codec test round with Smart H.265 cameras you can test with a busy scene as well.

Jiang Chengyuan

09/28/16 08:40am

What if Smart H.265 can reduce another half bandwidth consumption, will it be competitive?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Jiang Chengyuan | 09/28/16 10:32am

What if Smart H.265 can reduce another half bandwidth consumption, will it be competitive?

It can be competitive if enough VMSes adopt H.265 and the cost / complexity to decode is not too high. Unfortunately, the former is going to take some time to resolve and the latter will likely be an issue for a long time.

Avatar

Jon Dillabaugh

Pro Focus LLC
09/28/16 02:14pm

Is the Chinese adoption of HVEC possibly due to the lower adoption of western VMS products? This is just my interpretation of how I assume Chinese end users connect their IP cams, more to NVRs than VMS servers. So, if that is true, then it is easier to adopt HVEC, because the IP cam and NVR are the same brand. Where in the USA, it seems that we are more likely to use a VMS server.

Please correct me if my assumptions are wrong.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Jon Dillabaugh | 09/28/16 03:54pm

I think you're right about dvr/nvrs.

On the other hand, Milestone, Genetec and Aaxon are supporting h.265.

Still, its somewhat illusory because these are direct drivers written for particular models, so camera coverage is likely to be inconsistent and arbitrary for some time.

Now, if we had an even a draft ONVIF Profile specification for h.265, maybe things would be better, since a single driver could cover a multitude of cameras, but...

Related: Hello H.265, Goodbye ONVIF?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 09/28/16 05:05pm

On the other hand, Milestone, Genetec and Aaxon are supporting h.265.

No.

Milestone will support it shortly, but not yet. And also only for most expensive versions.

Genetec supports it generally but there are still issues with specific cameras, e.g., we have the new Samsung H.265 cameras but they do not work currently with Genetec.

Finally, as you know, since ONVIF does not support H.265, you have to use RTSP (with the limitations of that) or do a proprietary integration which limits cameras supported and increases cost / barriers to support.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to John Honovich | 09/28/16 05:53pm

No.

Right, no Milestone til next quarter. Thanks.

Genetec supports it generally but there are still issues with specific cameras, e.g., we have the new Samsung H.265 cameras but they do not work currently with Genetec.

Finally, as you know, since ONVIF does not support H.265, you have to use RTSP (with the limitations of that) or do a proprietary integration which limits cameras supported and increases cost / barriers to support.

Yes, I do know, as I said:

Still, its somewhat illusory because these are direct drivers written for particular models, so camera coverage is likely to be inconsistent and arbitrary for some time.

Now, if we had an even a draft ONVIF Profile specification for h.265, maybe things would be better, since a single driver could cover a multitude of cameras, but...

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

2020 Video Surveillance Cameras State Of The Market on Jan 03, 2020
Each year, IPVM explains the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and reporting. This...
Vivint Valuation Falls $1.5 Billion on Dec 19, 2019
Residential market struggles continue. Now, Vivint's valuation has fallen $1.5 billion in its impending merger. Inside this note, we examine...
"Good Market, Bad Business Models" - Residential Security on Dec 11, 2019
Industry banker John Mack, at his company's annual event, took aim squarely at the problems in the residential security...
In China, Foreign AI Companies Banned or Disadvantaged, Says Top China AI Company on Aug 28, 2019
Non-China (PRC) companies are prejudiced and unfairly targeted inside of the PRC's booming AI market, which not only denies them revenue inside of...
Stanley Makes "Multi-Million Dollar Investment" Into Banned Hikvision Products on Aug 09, 2019
Just days from the US government ban going into effect, US mega-corporation Stanley has dramatically increased its imports of banned Hikvision...
Vivotek Revenue Soars on Aug 05, 2019
Vivotek's revenue has soared so far in 2019, growing 45%. Inside this note, we examine import records and see who is driving Vivotek's growth...
Video Surveillance History on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to an emerging AI cloud era. The goal of this history is to...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
Hanwha Techwin Dropping Huawei on Jun 06, 2019
Hanwha Techwin is dropping Huawei Hisilicon from all of their products, the company has confirmed to IPVM. Inside this note, we examine Hanwha's...
Vivotek Talks About Taiwan, China, Bans, AI And Business Development on May 10, 2019
Vivotek, Taiwan's biggest manufacturer by revenue, did not have a booth at Taiwan's Secutech 2019 (which we are covering). However,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

FLIR New Coronavirus Prioritized Temperature Screening Camera Examined on Apr 03, 2020
FLIR has announced a new series of thermal cameras "prioritized for entities working to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 virus", the A400/A700...
ADI Branch Burglary on Apr 03, 2020
A security systems distributor branch is an odd target for burglary but that happened this week at ADI's Memphis location. Vehicle Smash &...
YCombinator AI Startup Visual One Tested on Apr 02, 2020
Startup Visual One, backed by Silicon Valley's powerful Y Combinator, aims to be "Your 24/7 Watchman" with advanced analytics and object...
Free IPVM Memberships For The Unemployed on Apr 02, 2020
IPVM is giving 3-month free memberships (regular price $99) for the unemployed, no questions asked. To get it, just contact us, your request...
Dahua Faked Coronavirus Camera Marketing on Apr 01, 2020
Dahua has conducted a coronavirus camera global marketing campaign centered around a faked detection. Now, Dahua has expanded this to the USA,...
Video Surveillance Trends 101 on Apr 01, 2020
This report examines major industry factors and how they could impact video surveillance in the next 5 - 10 years. This is part of our Video...
USA's Seek Scan Thermal Temperature System Examined on Apr 01, 2020
This US company, Seek, located down the road from FLIR and founded by former FLIR employees is offering a thermal temperature system for the...
Terrible Convergint Coronavirus Thermal Camera Recommendation on Apr 01, 2020
A week after Convergint disclosed falling revenue, pay and job cuts, Convergint is touting 'extensive research' that is either grossly incompetent...
The IPVM New Products Online Show April 2020 Opens With 40+ Manufacturers on Mar 31, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce the first New Products Online show, with 40+ manufacturers, to be held April 14 to the 16th, free to IPVM members,...