Amazon Rekognition Facial Detection Tested

IT
IPVM Team
•Published Dec 03, 2018 13:48 PM

******'* *********** ******* *** ********* ************, that ** ********, ***** ** * significant ******* **** ************ ****** *********.

amazon recognition

** **********,****** ******:

****** *********** *** *** ****** ** percent **** ***** – **** ***** have **** ********** ****** – ** images **** **** **** ** *** most *********** ********** ********* *******... ***** aspects ***** *******pose ********** caused by head movement and/or camera movements, ************ ** ********** ** ********** ******* (such ** ***** ******* ** ****, hair, ** ***** ** ******* ****** in *** **********),illumination ********** (such as low contrast and shadows), bright lighting that leads to washed out faces, low ******* and resolution that leads to noisy *** ****** *****, and distortion from cameras and lenses themselves. [emphasis added]

**** ********* * ******* ** ***+ 3-second ***** *****:

facial detection dataset 2

***** ***** *** **** ****** * number ** ****** ****-***** *********:

  • *** ***** (*** ***)
  • *** ***** (* ***)
  • **** **** (**** *° ** **°)
  • **** **** (**** *° ** **°)

** ******** ******* ************ (**** ** 200 ***, **° **** ****, **° down **** ** * ***, **° side ****, **° **** ****, ***.).

** **** *** ***** ** ***** 100+ ***** ****** ****** ********* **********:

  • ****
  • ***
  • ******** (************ *** ****-*********-******-**** ***** ** Intel ** *** ****** * ***** expanded ******** *** **** ****)
  • ****** ***********

******, ** ******* **** ******* *** key ********* ** ***********.

Key ********

****** *********** ****** ********* ******** *** far ****** **** *** ****** ****** including ****** ** **** ** ********:

facial detection overall accuracy

*** ****** *** ********* ***** '***' but **** ** *** ******** ** used **** ***** ****, ********* *** lightning *** *** ******.

*** *******, **** ** ******* *** scores ** *** ********** ****, **** for ****** ***********, ***** *********** ** performance ******* *** *******:

rekognition accuracy segmented

**** ******* *** *** ****** ****** lighting ***, **** '****' ***** *********** at ****** **% ***** *** ***** performance ** ***** **%.

***** *********** *** ********* ** ****** detection ********, ** ***, *** *** away, *** *******, ** *** ****** of ********* ****** ******** *** **** running ** ** **:

facial detection fps

*********** ** **** ****** **** *** chart ******** ** *** *********** ***** service ******** *** ***** ** ** sent ***** ** *** ***** *** other ******** *** ** **** ******* / ** *** **** / ***** the ****** **. ** ******* ***** measurement ******* ** *** ***** ******* of **** ******.

********

*****, ** ******* ** ***% ******** for ****** ***********, ***** ** ****** strong *********** *** **** ** **° down *** **° **** **** **** the ******:

[video-to-gif output image]

****, ** ******* ** **% ******** (meaning ~* *** ** ** ****** correctly ******* * ****) *** ****** Rekognition, ****** * ***** ********* ** steep **** *** **** **** **** the *******'* **** ****:

*** ***** ******, ** *****, **** much **** *********** **** *** ***********. For *******, **** * *** ** every * ****** *** * **** accurately ******** ****** **** * ***** angle *** *** ****** / ********:

*******, *** ** *** *** **** performances *** *********** *** ** **** test ********, ****** *** *****, *** subject ****** ******** ******* *** ****** but ***** **** *** *** ******** at ***:

Accuracy ***********

*** ******** ****** **** ** ************** and * **************. *********** **** ********* evaluation **** * ****** ******"**** ******* *********" (***), ***** ******** ***********-**-******* ** ****** face ********* ******** ************** ** ****** **** ********-*** ******* (something ****** "************ **** *****" ** IoU) *** ******* **** *** ********* captured * ****. ** ****'* ***** library, **** **** ****** *** *** face (***** ***** *** * ****, and ***** ** **** ***). ***** that, ** *** *** * ****** heuristic *** ********: ** *** **** frames *** * **** ******** (******** / *****-***** = ********). **** ** not *******: ** **********, ** **** not ******* *** ***** ********* (* face ** ******** ***********, **** ** the **** ** ** *** *******'* shirt). **** ******* ****** - ** we ***** **** *** *********. ** allows ** **** ******* **** ********** (lux, *****, ***) ******* ****** ** label ******** ***** *** ***** ***** of *** *******.

FPS ***********

*** ******* **** ****** **** *** Rekognition ***:

  1. ****** *** ***** ** ****** **
  2. ***** *** *****
  3. ***** *********** (******** ** ** *** S3 ****, *********** *****->***********)
  4. **** *** *****, ********* ***

* **** ****** ******** *** ************ would ** ** ****** ****** ******** via*******->***********. **** ***** *** *** ********** overhead ** * *****-**-***** *****, ***** our ***** ***** *** ********** ******** from *** *** *********** ********. ** such, *** *** ***********, ******* **** low, ***** ** **** *****.

***** ** **** ************, **** ** a ***** ***** ******* ***********, ** others ** *** ** * *******. For *******, *** *** *** ***-***** hardware *** ****** ******* ***********. *** other ****** ** **** ******* *** on ****** * ** ***** ** devices (****-***) *******, ** **** *********** trade-off ** *********-*********. ************, *********** ** a ******* *******, ***** *********** * model (**** ********'* ****-******-****) ***** **** configuration *** *****. ** ***** ****-**** performance **** *********** ** ******** (****: we *** ***** ************* ** **** is ********), *** ***-****-**** ************, *********** could ** ***** ******.

*******

*** * ****-**** ***** ************ ***********,*********** ************ ** ***** **** *** *** other ************ ***** **** ********** ***** processing ** ******, ** ***** ** far **** ********** **** **-**** **********. For *******, *********** ******* *** **-**** (N. ********) ** $*.** *** * min ** **** ****** ***** ********. Even **** **** **% ******** ** analyze (*.*., *,*** ******* ** * month), *** ******* **** ***** ** ~$50 (*,*** * **% * $*.**) just *** *** **** *********.

** *** ***** ****,****** *********** ****** ******* ***************** ****** ***********, ****** ******** (***, gender, *******), ****** *** ********** *********, etc. **** **** ********* ******** ****** do *** **** ** ***** ** likely ** ******** ** ******* **** their ***********.

********

**** ** *** *** ** ****'* new ****** ** **** ******** *****, starting ********** ********* ******,***** ****** ******* ***** * / Movidius ** ******* *** ****. ** *** ******** a ******* ** *** ***** ** the ******** ******. *** ********, ******** or *********, ****** *** ** *** comments.

Comments (8)
JH
John Honovich
•Dec 03, 2018
IPVM

For those of you interested in the fundamentals, check out our new class next week:

deep learning webinar2

Tyler will be explaining fundamentals as part of our parallel effort to provide comprehensive training and education, in addition to our ongoing tests.

(4)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #1
•Dec 03, 2018

Was any testing done running the algorithms with IR nightvision on? Most cameras would switch to IR nightvision (if they have the option) at 1 lux

(1)
(1)
JH
John Honovich
•Dec 03, 2018
IPVM
In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

We did not do any IR versions but we will try some in future tests.

MD
Matthew Del Salto
•Dec 03, 2018
Hudson Security

Just wait until they integrate it with Ring if they haven't already.

(1)
U
Undisclosed #2
•Dec 03, 2018

Is there any way you can post all of your raw video used in the tests for IPVM users to download and run thru their own Analytics systems?

(2)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #3
•Dec 03, 2018
In reply to Undisclosed #2

I think this would be a really great way to compare products.

(1)
JH
John Honovich
•Dec 03, 2018
IPVM
In reply to Undisclosed #2

We might release the dataset but have not decided yet.

(1)
U
Undisclosed #4
•Apr 08, 2020

Even with just 10% activity to analyze (i.e., 4,380 minutes in a month), the monthly cost would be ~$50 (4,380 x 10% x $0.12) just for the face analytics.

Aren't you considering the "10%" factor twice in this calculation? 4,380 minutes itself is 10% of total minutes in a month.

(1)