Amazon's "Dangerous New Face Recognition Technology" Says ACLU

By: John Honovich, Published on May 23, 2018

The ACLU has caused a stir, with a new report Amazon Teams Up With Law Enforcement to Deploy Dangerous New Face Recognition Technology, explaining:

Powered by artificial intelligence, Rekognition can identify, track, and analyze people in real time and recognize up to 100 people in a single image. It can quickly scan information it collects against databases featuring tens of millions of faces, according to Amazon...

With Rekognition, a government can now build a system to automate the identification and tracking of anyone.

Most importantly, the ACLU requested and received 147-pages of information on Amazon's interaction with US government entities. Based on that evidence, our conclusion is that Amazon is having success with greater potential for mugshot comparisons but much more challenges for 'real time' facial recognition. Inside this note, we share our review of that 147-page file, calling out the most notable passages and what that reveals about Amazon's progress, or lack thereof, in facial recognition.

Missing *****

*** **** ********, ***-******* ***** in *** **** ** that ****** ****** ** Simpson ** **** ******:

**** ** **** ** example ** ********** ******, who ***** ** *** on *** ** ******'****************** *********** *******.

** *** *** * user ** *** **********, the **** ** ******** should ** **********. *** if *** *** *** ACLU, *** *** ****** to **** ** **** afraid ** *** ***** liberties ************ ** ***** mismatches, ******, **********, ****** officers *** *** **** man ** *** ** Simpson.

Best *** **** *********

*** **** ********** ******, however, ** *** *********, clearest **** *** *** service, ** ** ******** explains *** ********:

Cheap *** ******* ***** ***********

****** *********** ******* **** photos ** *** ***** as **** ******* **** been ************ ********* *** years. *******, *** **** that ** ** ** inexpensive ** *** *** few ******* ******* *** month (*.*., '$* * month ** ****') ** disprutive economically.

Not ****-**** 

*** ***** ********** ****** makes *****, **** ******'* marketing *** *** ****'* fears, ** **** ***** searches '****** ******* ** less **** ** *******'. While **** ** ********* compared ** ***** **** manually, ** ** **** slow *** *** ********* and ***** ** ****-**** alerting.

Problem ***** ******

********** ****** ******** **** they *** ** *** and *** ******** **** have ***** ****:

Built ** *** ** ******

*** ********** ****** ******** explains *** ** ***** it ** *** ** the*********** ******* / ***:

**** ** *** * normal ****, ** *** employee ******** ** ********** did *********** ** **** and *** **** **** recognition *** ** *** own '**** ****':

**** ******* *** *** success **** **** ***** on *** ***** ****, video **** ******** *****:

Orlando ****-**** ****** ************ *********

**** ***** ** **** impressive ********** *** **** troubling *** ******* ** the ****'* ****** ***** Amazon's ***** ** *******, where *** **** ********:

*********** **** ************ ** now ********* ****** ******* in ****-****, ********* ** ******, ******** *** ******* to ****** *** “****** of ********” ** ******* rolls ** **** “******* all **** *** ****.”

*** ******* ** **** the **** ***** ** Amazon ******** ***** *** [link ** ****** *********], who ** ******** ****** to ****** *** ******* the ****** **** *** following ***** ****:

***** *** **** **** ***** claims, ** *** ********* or ***** ********. *** one, *** ********** ****** **** cites * ~ **-****** processing ****, *** **** our ********** **** ****** cloud *******, **** *** not ***** ** '****-****' (where ****-**** ***** **** a ****** ** ***).

********, ******* ***************** ***** ****** ** the ***:

*** *** *** ***** of ****** *******, ***** having ******* *********** ** Orlando *** ******* ********** any ** *** ****-**** or *** **** *** city **********.

****, *** *** *****, even ** *** *********, given *** ****** ** processing ******** *** *** certain ******** ******** **** would ***** ******** **** at *****, **** ** more **** **** *******.

ACLU ***** ** *********** **** *** ******** ** ****** ******

**** *****, ** ***** the **** *** ****** the ****** ****** ********** these ******** ** *** government *** *** ********* risks ** **** **********. However, *** **** ***** more ******** **** *** trade *********, ****** *********** in *******. ******** ***** overstated ********* ***** * ************ company *****, *** **** accepts **. ***** **** are ****** ******** *** do *** ********** *** the ********** *****, ** maybe **** ***** **** magnify *** ********* ***** and ****** ** *** problem, **** ** *** technology ** *** **** where **** ****** ** to **.

Outlook ***** - ********* ** ********

*** ********** ****** *** case ** * **** good ******* ** * low-cost *** ** *** technology ** ******* **** a ****** ******* ** scanning *** ********. ** expect **** ** ******** to ******.

*******, *** ****-**** '*** over *** ****' *** of ****** *********** ** much **** ***********, ** these ********* **** **********. 

Comments (19)

Undisclosed End User #1

05/23/18 06:46pm

Give us sex offender databases with booking photos and let's have our school security cameras go to work!

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed End User #1 | 05/23/18 08:02pm

Not sure if you are serious or not but I think that application could be problematic. 

Considerations:

- How often does someone on the sex offender database go to a given school? Guess. The rarer it is, the more likely the ratio of false positives is terrible (i.e., people matched as sex offenders who are not to actual sex offenders).

- The delay in getting back matches from the system. You have to analyze the video stream for faces, get the faces, send them to Amazon, wait for Amazon to return a match. By that time, the person may have moved quite far.

- Then you need an operator who is going to review each of these alerts (which returns to the problem of pt 1 above).

Undisclosed End User #1

In reply to John Honovich | 05/23/18 08:21pm

The problem is we don't know how often a sex offender visits a school. (side note: we are discussing a visitor management system that will do the check, but government doesn't more very quickly so I don't know what year this will happen. Additionally, some administrators seem uncomfortable with any type of check). 

I agree and realize that this system isn't ready for most applications, yet. The ACLU is overreacting, for now.   

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed End User #1 | 05/23/18 08:26pm

Curious - what visitor management system is including facial recognition / criminal / sex offender check in their offering? I could see the value, also since you are taking a picture of the person right in front of you, the quality would be better.

Undisclosed End User #1

In reply to John Honovich | 05/23/18 08:36pm

The visitor management system I'm most familiar with is School Gate Guardian. 

For clarification, it doesn't use facial recognition, rather subscription-based and end-user maintained databases. Upon entry, your ID is scanned, and it looks for a database match.

It also uses your ID info to print a temporary sticker-badge with the photo from your ID.

Many school districts think a paper sign-in sheet is adequate for visitor tracking. I do not.

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to John Honovich | 05/23/18 08:41pm

EasyLobby also has a sex offender screening service which searches all 50 state databases based on ID. But it doesn't have facial recognition, either.

Avatar

Lynn Harold

In reply to John Honovich | 05/24/18 11:05pm

A few years ago, I did an implementation at a private school with HID Easy Lobby and tied in the sex offender database.  It used the person's name and DOB to match against the registry (we were scanning driver's licenses to register visitors).  I actually got a hit on Day 1 - just a coincidence that a contractor had the same name and DOB as someone on the registry, but was clearly not the same person.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Lynn Harold | 05/24/18 11:29pm

Lynn, thanks!

just a coincidence that a contractor had the same name and DOB as someone on the registry

What a nightmare for that person, not simply that incident but the thought that it might happen regularly for him. 

Slava H

05/23/18 09:13pm

Thank for such a comprehensive overview John. Very helpful, please keep up the good work. 

This $6 fees is a strange number - seems like Orlando Police obtained this price by using not GovCloud (which is 332.95$ charge) but regular UsWest (Oregon) AWS Recognition service. 

 

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Slava H | 05/23/18 09:41pm

Slava, thanks! The $6 claim comes from Washington, not Orlando. I am not sure what Orlando did there.

Related, for those curious on the $332.95 charge, from page 25:

The above says 277,461 images. That sounds like a lot but, for comparison, there are 10x the number of seconds in a month (i.e., 2,628,000 seconds in a month), so even a single camera only sending 1 image every 10 seconds would generate this.

Slava H

In reply to John Honovich | 05/24/18 12:29am

Hi John, you are right.

Yes, 332$ charge seems to be for GovCloud images, while 3$ for regular US West recognition cloud storage and 2.7$ for US West recognition processing (magic 6$ number).

So i was curious how come in report they wrote about 6$ monthly charge. I don't think public sector can use any other cloud except GovCloud. 

And yes, in regards to amount images one need to process. If we want to  process every 1sec IFrame it would cost 3k$ per camera for GovCloud and 2.6k for regular AWS cloud recognition service. This is just a processing fees of recognition service.

One could say that simple optimization strategy would be to use some kind of motion/face detection to minimize face analytics processing. Public cameras in crowded places would need to be processed 24/7 thought.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Slava H | 05/24/18 12:58am

I don't know about the government cloud options but I think the $332.95 is the one time charge for uploading the original mugshot database.

Slava H

05/24/18 07:12pm

Yes, you are right John.

332$ charge is for storage for GovCloud since its price is 1.2$ per 1000 image sin comparison to 0.01$ for 1000 images for regular cloud region.

Paul Shah

06/27/18 05:40pm

Orlando Police End Test Of Amazon's Real-Time Facial 'Rekognition' System

 

 

Undisclosed #2

06/27/18 11:58pm

There is no avoiding this as it is our future. AI technology will evolve and become so useful the bad guy will not be able to go anywhere.

Stop freaking out /tinfoil hat.

I just can't wait for my Alexa phone!

Avatar

Sean Patton

IPVM | 07/12/18 06:44pm

Orlando PD is extending its test of Amazon 'Rekognition'

 

 

Michael Miller

07/26/18 09:56pm

Amazon's Face Recognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress with Mugshots.

Undisclosed #3

12/14/18 09:16am

Update: ACLU worried about integration of Rekognition and Ring after reviewing Amazon patent

John Honovich

IPVM | 07/24/19 08:21pm

Update: Orlando cancels Amazon Rekognition program, capping 15 months of glitches and controversy | Orlando Weekly exclusive, citing upstream bandwidth issues sending video to AWS:

"We haven't even established a stream today. We're talking about more than a year later," Rosa Akhtarkhavari, Orlando's chief information officer, said in an interview with Orlando Weekly during the second pilot. "We have not, today, established a reliable stream." 

Akhtarkhavari, Orlando's technology czar who spearheaded the pilot, said bandwidth issues prevented city staff from running the powerful software in conjunction with any more than one camera — and sometimes that signal wouldn't work as expected. "We've never gotten to the point to test images," she said. 

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

Startup Solink $17 Million USD Fund Raise Expands To Mass Market on Jun 24, 2020
Solink has raised ~$17 million USD, a sizeable round for the company that...
Video Surveillance 101 Book Released on Jul 07, 2020
IPVM's unique introduction to video surveillance series is now available as a...
30 Million Criminal Face Database Tested (Captis Intelligence) on Apr 27, 2020
30 million criminal mugshots are now available for facial recognition...
Startup Visual One Presents Object Detection and Smart Search on Aug 26, 2020
Visual One, a Y Combinator backed startup led by a PhD in machine learning...
Face Shields Impact On Temperature Measurement And Mask Detection on Jul 27, 2020
First, the use of face masks, and now, plastic face shields are rising...
This YouTuber is Now Selling ThermoHealth Temperature Screening on Jul 29, 2020
An enterprising 20-year old is mass marketing medical devices on Facebook and...
Axxon Presents VMS 4.4 and AI Behavior Analytics on May 20, 2020
AxxonSoft presented its VMS 4.4 and AI behavior analytics at the April 2020...
ADI Adds Lockers on Mar 20, 2020
Locker delivery is a growing trend, spurred by Amazon. Now, ADI has added...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI object recognition and mask detection offering...
Alcatraz Presents Face Recognition Access Control on Jun 11, 2020
Alcatraz presented its AI facial recognition access reader at the May 2020...
Ivy League Grads Present Percepta Shoplifting Detection on Jun 17, 2020
Ivy League graduates of the University of Pennsylvania presented their...
AndroVideo Presents Edge AI Face Recognition Cameras on Jun 26, 2020
AndroVideo presented its AI at the edge face recognition cameras at the May...
Deep Sentinel Presents Crime Response For Business on Jun 11, 2020
Deep Sentinel presented its anti-intrusion and live response for home and...
Startup Monitoreal Presents Home Object Detection AI on Aug 24, 2020
Monitoreal presented its on-premise only object detection AI at the 2020 IPVM...
Defendry Presents AI Active Shooter Security System on Jul 14, 2020
Defendry presented its Active Shooter security system at the May 2020 IPVM...

Recent Reports

Mobile Access Control Usage Statistics 2020 on Sep 21, 2020
Most smartphones can be used as access control credentials, but how...
Axis Compares Fever Camera Sellers to 9/11 on Sep 18, 2020
Axis Communications, the West's largest surveillance camera manufacturer, has...
Chilean Official Investigated for Motorola And Hikvision Contracts on Sep 17, 2020
A corruption investigation is underway in Chile after a crime prevention...
Huawei HiSilicon Production Shut Down on Sep 17, 2020
Huawei HiSilicon chips are no longer being manufactured or supplied to...
Virtual ISC West and GSX+ Exhibiting Contrasted on Sep 17, 2020
Both ISC West and ASIS GSX are going virtual this year, just weeks apart, but...
X.Labs Sues FLIR on Sep 16, 2020
X.Labs, the maker of Feevr, has sued FLIR, the publicly traded thermal...
Video Surveillance 101 September Course - Last Chance on Sep 16, 2020
Today is the last chance to sign up for the Fall Video Surveillance 101...
No Blackbody Mistake, Half Million Dollar, Hikvision Fever Camera System in Georgia on Sep 16, 2020
A Georgia school district touted buying Hikvision fever screening "about...
Costar Technologies / Arecont H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 16, 2020
Costar's financial results have been hit by the coronavirus with the company...
Startup Cawamo Presents Live Alerts With Edge AI and Cloud VMS on Sep 15, 2020
Cawamo, an Israeli edge-to-cloud analytics and VMS startup, presented its...
Favorite Access Control Credentials 2020 on Sep 15, 2020
Credential choice is more debated than ever, with hacking risk for 125kHz and...
Dangerous Hikvision Fever Screening Marketing In Africa on Sep 15, 2020
A multi-national African Hikvision distributor is marketing dangerously...
New Products Show Fall 2020 Announced - Register Now on Sep 14, 2020
IPVM's sixth online show will feature New Products from over 25...
Hanwha 8K / 33MP Camera Tested on Sep 14, 2020
Hanwha Techwin has released an 8K / 33MP resolution camera, the TNB-9000 with...