Axis Open VMS (Axis Camera Station 5) Tested

By Ethan Ace, Published Mar 14, 2016, 12:00am EDT

Axis has launched an open VMS, with its new ACS5. What has historically been an Axis only offering is now suddenly a potential competitor to the many open VMSes in the market, including its corporate sibling Milestone.

But how well does it work? We downloaded ACS5 and the free trial license to try it out.

Here is a quick peek showing 4 manufacturers running inside ACS5:

Inside, we examine the 3 key strengths and 5 key weaknesses of ACS5.

Key ********

*** *** ********* ********:

  • ***** ***** ****** *********** was ***** ** *** tests *** *** ****** compatibility ****, ****** **** some ***************, ******.
  • ********** ** **** ******* was ****** *** ****, allowing ******** ******* *** integration
  • ****** ******* **********, ******** in ****, *** ****** and ******.

*** *** ********** ********:

  • ** *** ******* *** third ***** *******, ********** recording ****. **** **** adding ***** ***** *** support ** * **** priority *** **** *******.
  • *** *** ********* ******* works ****, *** ** not ***** *** ******* up **** **** ******** VMSes.
  • ********** **** / ****** management ** *********. ****** Axis ******** ********** ***** from ******** *******, ******** that ** ***********.
  • ********* ******* ** *********. Though ******** ******* *** be ******** **************, ********* they ****** ** ****** back *************.
  • ** ***** ****** ******. While **** ***** ** not ******* ****, ****' own****** ********* **** *** does **** ****. **** **** ****** this ** * **** priority *** **** *******.

Pricing **** ** ***** *****

*** *** *** * types ** *********. ***** is ********* **** ******* ******** **** *** (ACS5)******:

  • **** ******** *** *** Axis ******* *** **** up ** ** *******. MSRP ** $** *** per ******.
  • ********* ******** *** *** any *** **** ****** and *** *** ******* over ** *******. **** is $*** *** *** device.
  • ****** ***** ** ***** on ***** ******* ** a ******, *.*., ** you **** *** **** cameras ****** ** ******* connected ** * ****** client, **** ***** ******* 32 **** *** *** higher ****** ********* ********.
  • ** ********* / ****** / *********** ****, ** before, *** ****** ******** (ACS6, ***.) *** ******* an ******* ***.

Competitive ******

***** ***, **** ** 3rd ***** *** *******, ACS5 **** ********* ** for ***** *** **** all **** *** **** need ** *** ** a *** *** ***** cameras. *******, **** **** adds **** *** ***** remote ******, ** ******* that **** **** ** a ********, *** ************ competitor, ** **** ***** like ***** *** *********.

Solid ***** ***** ****** ***** ***********

*** ***** ***** ******* attempted (* ****** **** 5 *************) ****** ******* issues ** *** *, with ************* ** ********* and ********** *********** ********, and ***** ************ ********.

No ***** ***** ***

*** * **** *** support ***** ****** ********* on ***** ***** *******. Camera **** *** ** supported ** **** ******* only.

**** ***** **** ***-**** models *** ******* ** continuous ********* ****, * significant **********, ** **** VMSes ******* **** **** of ****** ********* (****** or ****** ****) *** many/most ***** ***** *******.

Device ************* **** ******

**** ****** ************* ********** ************* **** ****. Users ***** *** ******'* IP ******* *** ***********, and ***** ************* ***** are ***, *********** ********** of *.*** *** ***** streaming, *****, *** ***** configuration (***/**********). **** ********* that ******* **** ** ONVIF ******* * **********, but *** ****** ** not, *** **** *** use *** **** ******* S **** *** ***** party ************, ****** **** basic ****** *** *********.

************ *******

******* ********, *****, ****/*****, Hikvision, *** ****, ******* were ************, **** **** cameras ******* *** **** failing, *** ******* ******** upon ******, ******* ******** any ***** ********.

*** *******, ** ****** the ******** *.**-**-**, ***** fully ****** *** *****, shown ** **********. *******, running *** **** * second ****, *** ****** failed ***** *****. ******* a ***** ****, ** passed **** *****.

***** *** *** **** common *******, * ********** minor ******* ***** *** rarity ** ***** *********/*********. Only * ****** ******, the ********* **-*********-* ****** video ********* ***** (*****). However, **** ****** ****** fine ** *** **** added.

Strong **** ****** **********

*** ****** ****** ********** for *** ** *** Axis *******, **** *** Axis ****** ********** ********* integrated ******** **** *** client. **** ****** ***** to ******* ********, ******* ACAP ************, *** ********* cameras ** **** ******** from *** ******. ***** functions *** *** ********* in ***** ***** *******. Note **** ************* **** the **** *********** ***********, instead ** ****** ********, which *** ** ********* for ****** *****.

******* ** *** ********** interface, ***** ************* ******* are *********, **** ** brightness, ********, ***, ***., in ******** ** ***/**********/*********** available *** *** *******.

** ****** ***** ******** in **** *****:

Improved ****** ********* **********

*** * **** * licensing ****** ******* ***** users *** ****** ***** systems' ********, *** ******, and *** ********** ****** channels ******* ******* ** visit *** **** ** access *** ****** ********. Licenses *** ********* *** automatically ****** ** *** server *** *** ********. For ***** ******* ******** access, ***** *** ******** a ******* **** ***** can ** ******** ** the ******.

** **** **** ****** in *** ***** *****:

New ********* ** ****** ******* ** ***********

****' *** ********* ******* allows ***** ** ****** click *** **** ******* archived *****, ******* ** requiring **** ** **** back/forward ** ******* ****** or ***** ** ******** points ** *** ********. This ** *** ** ACS, *** ****** ** most ***** *****.

Export ******* *********

*** * ******* ***** in **** .*** ****** only, ******* * *********** player. ******** ******* *** be ******** ** *** time, *** ******* * proprietary/multi-camera ******. * ******** is ******* ********** *** clips ********, *** **** are ****** **** ************, not **************.

Enterprise **** / ****** ********** *********

******** *** * ********* may ** ****** *** configured **** *** ****** instance, *** **** ******** are *** ****** *********. In ***** ** *** up ******** *******, ***** export * ************* **** from * ********** ******, and ****** ** ** the ****. ******** ** not ****** ****** *** user ***** ***** ** a ******* ********.

No ***** *********

****** *** ***** ********** found ** *********** **** ****** ********* release, *** * ******** manual **** ********** ** remotely *******, ****** *** client ** ****** *** (new **** *** *). Users **** ******** ***** the ** ******* ** host **** ** **** server **** **** ** connect **. ** ********,**** ****** ********* ******* *** ***** ** a ****'* **** *******, allowing **** ** *** in ******** ******* ****** setup.

Server ****/*** *****

*** ***** ** *** Axis ****** ******* ******* itself *** ***, ~*-*% on ** ** *.* GHz, **** *** ** and * ***** ******* in ***. **** ***** remained ****** ********** ********** of *******/********** ** ***.

**** ****** ******** ******** decoding ** *** *, but ** *** *****, we *** ** ********** with *** ******** ** or ***. ** **** reached *** ** **** for *******.

Comments (13)

Avatar

Ari Erenthal

Chesapeake & Midlantic
03/14/16 03:13pm

Why even bother releasing without third party VMD now? Either wait until VMD works, or release as is but make the announcement at ISC West. If they would have waited, it probably would have been the big announcement at ISC.

Agree
Disagree: 2
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Ari Erenthal | 03/14/16 04:48pm

"Why even bother releasing without third party VMD now?"

Getting ONVIF based VMD to work consistently is a minefield (see ONVIF test results) so that could have been a factor.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Ari Erenthal

Chesapeake & Midlantic
In reply to John Honovich | 03/14/16 06:14pm

No, I get that, I'm asking why they didn't wait to launch or announce it as ISC, in just a few weeks.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Brian Karas

IPVM | In reply to Ari Erenthal | 03/14/16 06:48pm

IMO, if you're going to wait for ISC West to drop a product announcement it should be HUGE.

This is really incremental to something Axis has had for a while. It's noteworthy, but it's not enough to drown out the rest of the noise at ISC West. As Itamar noted, the price itself isn't really fantastic for the feature set you get.

Many people go to ISC West with a game plan of what they want to see. As a manufacturer you're better off (IMO) getting releases like this out earlier. Give people time to digest it, give people time to think about it relative to other options, and then at the show you can have a more in-depth conversation with an informed person.

For Axis, an ISC West level announcement would be them doing a 32MP camera to rival Avigilon's 30MP. You know Avigilon is going to have a lot of their messaging at ISC West revolving around the 7K camera, so Axis could throw their competitor off their game by making an announcement like that AT the show.

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #1

IPVMU Certified | In reply to Brian Karas | 03/14/16 09:04pm

For Axis, an ISC West level announcement would be them doing a 32MP camera

That would ship 32M later...

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Itamar Kerbel

03/14/16 03:23pm

I'm not sure what the strategy is. It feels like with 80$ per device is too expensive for what you get.

I'm guessing that things will improve over time but the price is too close to milestone essential license.

I understand that both MS and AX want to keep the appearance of an independent companies but I think the better strategy is keep being open but base your products on milestone at this stage.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Itamar Kerbel | 03/14/16 04:47pm

"It feels like with 80$ per device is too expensive for what you get."

My guess is that the price is a 'feature', not a 'bug'. In other words, Axis may have set that price to limit the competitive threat of ACS to third parties. Imagine if they gave away ACS for Axis cameras? That would be highly disruptive to their partner relationships.

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed #1

IPVMU Certified | 03/14/16 07:04pm

Imagine if they gave away ACS for Axis cameras?

Imagine if Milestone gave away a camera with every license. :)

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Undisclosed Integrator #2

03/14/16 07:36pm

Ask the customer what features they feel are most needed that they are willing to pay for. Then compare those comments with one of the no license fee manufacturers. I bet most do not give a hoot about half the stuff and if they knew they could RECORD, PUSH to the CLOUD, and VIEW LIVE for free they would do it for FREE.

Agree
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Luis Carmona

IPVMU Certified | 05/09/16 11:58am

Was there an example video of the user basics I might have missed? Here is how what the start interface looks like... Here is how to bring up and change cameras... Here is how to change or choose your layout... Here is how to playback/rewind/jump to previous date and time in video ... Here is how to get to the Event List (if any)...

As for the software, it seems very behind established players in similar price ranges like DW Spectrum/NXWitness, Exacq Start and Pro, MS Essential (alreayd mentioned), etc. I guess their long term play is for people who want all Axis at the small to mid level installations...?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Luis Carmona | 05/09/16 12:49pm

What specifically makes you think it is 'very behind established players in similar price ranges'?

We did not record basic videos as we focused on what's new as the basics remain the same from previous versions of ACS.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Luis Carmona

IPVMU Certified | In reply to John Honovich | 05/09/16 02:40pm

I think the lack of camera side motion detection, the lack of multiview export, and the other players just seem to have more established 3rd party camera support. I'm not saying they can't catch up quickly if they want to. But my jaded view is while many manufacturers say they'll do this or that soon, it usually takes a long time.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Sean Patton

IPVM | 01/31/20 03:07pm

We reviewed the last few year's releases of Axis Camera Station, a client UX refresh and Manual Video Redaction being the primary significant changes, while overall the majority of new features have been incremental configuration changes (e.g. camera password management updates), minor UX updates (e.g. Touchscreen actions enabled, 3rd party fisheye dewarp) and bug fixes.

We have decided not to test currently but might in the future if Axis substantially improves ACS.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,956 reports, 927 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports